Rating History
Dissemination Date Long-Term Rating Short-Term Rating Outlook Action Rating Watch
08-Apr-25 A- A2 Stable Maintain YES
08-Apr-24 A- A2 Stable Maintain YES
11-Apr-23 A- A2 Stable Maintain YES
13-Apr-22 A- A2 Stable Upgrade -
30-Apr-21 BBB+ A2 Stable Maintain YES
About the Entity

Shazad Textile Mills Limited ('Shahzad Textile' and “the Company”) commenced operations in 1979 as a public limited company. The Company manufactures ring-spun cotton and synthetic blended yarns, with a total installed capacity of 70,428 spindles and 197 knitting machines. Mr. Imran Aslam along with other family members, collectively owns the majority stake (~78.55%) in the Company. The remaining shareholding is held by corporates & related parties (~5.67%), and ~15.78% is held by numerous individuals and institutions. The Board is chaired by Mr. Mian Parvez Aslam. Mr. Imran Aslam heads the Company as the CEO. He is supported by an experienced management team.

Rating Rationale

Pakistan's spinning industry comprises ~368 dedicated spinning units with an estimated size of ~PKR 895bln and ~13.4mln spindles installed as of FY24. The projected cotton production estimate is revised and forecasted to be ~10.9mln bales, and as of 3MFY25, the production has reached up to ~1.4mln bales, which is ~12.8% of the projected production. During FY24, better local raw cotton yield supplemented the industry for import substitution, with domestic production of ~8.4mln bales constituting ~75.5% of the total supply. In comparison, imports shrank to ~10.8% (~1.2mln bales). In FY25, the transition from the final tax regime to the normal tax regime is set to impact the profitability matrix of export-oriented units, with a 29% tax on profits and a super tax of up to 10%. The consistent decline in policy rates, along with the anticipation of further reductions, is expected to provide a cushion to the industry.
Shahzad Textile Mills Limited ('Shahzad Textile' and 'the Company') has an adequate market presence in specialty yarn, offering a range of products including ring-spun yarn and synthetic blended yarn. Over the years, the Company has enhanced its business profile by successfully diversifying into the value-added socks segment. Shahzad Textile remains focused on building long-standing customer relations, both in the local and international markets. During FY24, the Company experienced an increase in its topline, attributed to both volumetric and value-driven growth. However, faced pressure from increased cotton prices due to high inflation. This, along with substantial rupee depreciation and a surge in energy costs, led to a negative net return. However, lately, as policy rates have reduced along with controlled inflation, the Company's business risk profile, including margins, is expected to gradually pick up. The management envisions operating the socks segment at an optimal capacity and generating solid returns, going forward. This, if managed well, is expected to support the Company's overall performance. On the financial risk front, the Company reaps the benefit of a low-leveraged capital structure. The absolute quantum of equity is low, however, the sponsors have given additional interest free loan to the Company. The coverages remain stretched with adequate working capital management. The ratings have been assigned a 'Watch' due to the continued pressure from increasing electricity costs and resultant losses incurred. Nonetheless, strong acumen and demonstrated financial support from the sponsors bode well for the Company.

Key Rating Drivers

The ratings are dependent upon the management's ability to improve the margins, profitability, and financial profile of the Company. This includes avoiding any asset-liability mismatch that may arise and effectively managing its position in a competitive segment. Any further deterioration in debt coverages and/or subdued profitability will have a negative impact on ratings.

Profile
Legal Structure

Shahzad Textile Mills Limited ('Shahzad Textile' and 'the Company') is a public listed company incorporated in 1979 under the Companies Ordinance 1984 (now called the Companies Act 2017).


Background

Late Mian M. Aslam entered in the business arena by setting up spinning units and a jute mill. M. Aslam also held stakes in textile and other ventures operating under the umbrella of Sargodha Group. Later, as the ownership split, Shahzad Textile, Shaheen Cotton (that was later merged with and into the Company) and Sagodha Jute Mills was handed over to Mian Parvez Aslam and passed on to his son (third generation) Mian Imran Aslam.  


Operations

The Company operates three spinning units with a current capacity of 70,428 spindles. Unit #1 focuses on PV yarn, while Unit #2 produces polyester cotton yarn. Unit #3 has been replaced with a sock manufacturing unit housing 197 knitting machines. The Company requires ~4.7MW of energy, which is met through a mix of ~8.9MW of renewable (solar) and LESCO's connection (sanctioned limit: 7.2MW).


Ownership
Ownership Structure

Mr. Imran Aslam along with other family members owns the majority (~78.55%) stakes in the Company. ~5.67% of the shareholding in the Company is held by corporates. The remaining ~15.78% is distributed among local and foreign investors and institutions.


Stability

The fourth generation of the Aslam family has joined the business. Although, there is no formal succession plan but the shareholding and operational roles are equally divided between the sponsors, Mr. Imran Aslam and Mr. Irfan Aslam.


Business Acumen

The sponsors hold decades of related experience and have witnessed numerpous business cycles. This bodes well for the overall decision making process for the Company. 


Financial Strength

Mr. Imran Aslam holds ~28% shareholding in Sargodha Jute Mills Limited. Other than that, on a personal level, he is an active investor in real estate and the stock market. This portrays adequate financial muscles of sponsors to support the Company, if the need arises.


Governance
Board Structure

The overall control of the Company vests in a seven-member Board. The Board comprises two Executive Directors, three Non-Executive Directors, and two Independent Directors, including a Female Director. The Board holds independence and gender diversity that benefits the decision making process.


Members’ Profile

Mian Parvez Aslam, the Chairman, carries with him over four decades of experience and has been associated with the Board since inception. He looks after the policies and other operational issues of the Company and guides his valuable experience in times of need.


Board Effectiveness

The Board is assissted by two committees: Audit and HR & Remuneration Committee (HR&R). The Audit Committee meets quarterly to approve financial statements prior to Board meetings. HR&R meets at least once in a financial year and may meet more often if requested by the Board. Meanwhile, the Director's attendance has remained strong and meeting minutes have been formally recorded.


Financial Transparency

The External Auditors of the Company, M/S. Crowe Hussain Chaudhury & Co., Chartered Accountants, an 'A' category QCR-rated firm, has expressed an unqualified opinion on financial statements for the period ended FY24.


Management
Organizational Structure

The Company's organizational structure is divided into two main divisions: Head Office and Mills. All departmental Heads report directly to the CEO, who then reports to the BoD. However, the Head of Internal Audit and HR reports administratively to the CEO and finctionally to the respective Board Committee. 


Management Team

Mr. Imran Aslam heads the Company as the CEO. He is supported by a team of experienced professionals, including Mr. Imran Haider, who is the CFO of the Company. Mr. Imran Haider has been associated with the Company for almost a decade while having an overall two decades of experience. The senior management has over a decade of relevant experience with a long association with the Company.


Effectiveness

Management's decision making process is managed through monthly meetings of all departmental Heads. Performance reviews of all units are conducted during these discussions. However. there is no formal management committe in place.


MIS

The Company has in place oracle Oracle-based local ERP system by the name of Wizmen. The Company maintains adequate IT infrastructure and related controls.


Control Environment

The Company places emphasis on the sustainable quality of yarn. For this, it is compliant with the latest version of ISO 9001-2008 Certification. The Company has placed an in-house internal audit funtion to monitor the policy formation and implementation process. This bodes well for the Company.


Business Risk
Industry Dynamics

Pakistan's spinning industry is highly fragmented and consists of ~368 dedicated spinning units with an estimated size of ~PKR 895bln and ~13.4mln spindles installed as of FY24. The projected cotton production estimate is revised and forecasted to be ~10.9mln bales, and as of 3MFY25, the production has reached up to ~1.4mln bales, which is ~12.8% of the projected production. During FY24, better local raw cotton yield supplemented the industry for import substitution, with domestic production of ~8.4mln bales constituting ~75.5% of the total supply. In comparison, imports shrunk to ~10.8% of the total supply (~1.2mln bales). In FY25, the transition from the final tax regime to the normal tax regime is set to impact the profitability matrix of export-oriented units, with a 29% tax on profits and a super tax of up to 10%. The consistent decline in policy rates over the last two quarters, along with the anticipation of further reductions, is expected to provide a cushion in the financial metrics of the industry.


Relative Position

During FY24, the Company’s Yarn production capacity stood at ~41,733 MT with the production amounting to ~36,047 MT at a utilization of ~86.4%. Similarly, the Company’s production capacity of Socks stood at ~28.8mln pairs, with the production amounting to ~14.6mln pairs at a utilization of ~50.7%. Consequently, when considered independently, the Company holds a minimal presence in the local market, accounting for just ~1.5% of the market share based on yarn production.


Revenues

During FY24, the Company experienced an increase in revenue, rising by ~31.15% to ~PKR 11,015mln, predominantly due to value-driven growth. (FY23: ~PKR 8,399mln). The increase in revenue resulted primarily from the local sale of Yarn and the export of Socks. Yarn sales constituted most of the Company's revenue, accounting for ~90% of the total, and export revenue contributed ~10% to the total revenue. During 6MFY25, the Company's revenue increased by ~10.54%, reaching ~PKR 5,464mln compared to ~PKR 4,943mln during 6MFY24. Similarly, during 6MFY25, the Company sold most of its inventory locally, with export sales contributing ~13.44%.


Margins

During FY24, the Company encountered an improvement in the gross margin to ~4.7% from ~2.8% during FY23. This incline was primarily attributed to the significant increase in sales which outperformed the increase in cost of goods sold. Consequently, the Company's operating margins increased to ~0.8% from ~ -2.0% during FY23. This trickle-down effect impacted the Company’s net profitability during FY24, resulting in a loss of ~PKR 99mln, a significant improvement from the loss of ~PKR 269mln recorded in FY23. This upward trend in profitability culminated in a negative net margin of ~ -0.9% compared to the net margin of ~3.2% during FY23. During 6MFY25, the Company experienced an incline in its gross margin, which increased to ~5.0% from ~4.3% during 6MFY24. This improvement in gross margin led to an operating margin of ~0.5%, compared to ~0.0% in 6MFY24. As a result, the Company recorded a net margin of ~-0.3% due to a net loss of ~PKR 19mln, in contrast to a loss of ~PKR 90mln during 6MFY24.


Sustainability

The Company is planning to enhance penetration in current export avenues. The management has deferred the expansion plan of socks segments from 197 to 300 knitting machines, costing around PKR 400mln, and envisions to operate the already installed capaicty of the socks segment at an optimal capacity, going forward. This, if managed well, is expected to support the Company's overall performance. Moreover, as policy rates have reduced along with controlled inflation, the Company's business risk profile, including margins, may gradually pick up.


Financial Risk
Working capital

The Company meets its working capital requirements primarily through internally generated cash flow and short-term borrowing. As of FY24, the net working capital cycle days decreased to ~28 days (FY23: ~42 days). This reduction was attributed to reduced inventory days (FY24: ~24 days, FY23: ~32 days) and trade receivable days (FY24: ~9 days, FY23: ~15 days), highlighting effective inventory management and quicker receivable collection. On the other hand, trade payable days remained stable ~5 days over the period. As of 6MFY25, the net working capital cycle days increased to ~35 days, compared to ~32 days at 6MFY24. This increase was primarily attributed to an increase in inventory days to ~33 days from ~29 days at 6MFY24. Trade receivable days remained stable at ~9 days over the period, with trade payable days increasing slightly to ~7 days (6MFY24: ~5 days). Additionally, the Company's trade assets are reporting an incline over the period with an increase of ~17% to ~PKR 1,474mln, up from ~PKR 1,263mln in FY23, with this trend continuing over the half year (6MFY25: ~PKR 1,976mln, 6MFY24: ~PKR 1,448mln). Moreover, the short-term trade leverage decreased to ~44.7% from ~56.4% in FY23. This indicates the Company's effective management of its working capital and trade assets to support its operational needs and financial stability.


Coverages

In FY24, the Company's FCFO improved to ~PKR 62mln (FY23: ~-PKR 168mln) due to a profit before tax of ~PKR 82mln as compared to a loss before tax of ~PKR 188mln as of FY23. Similarly, the interest coverage improved to ~0.3x (FY23: ~-1.3x), mainly attributable to positive FCFO. The Company's debt coverage also improved to ~0.2x (FY23: ~-0.5x). As of 6MFY25, the FCFO of the Company declined to ~24mln (6MFY24: ~32mln) attributable to increased tax paid (6MFY25: ~PKR 100mln, 6MFY24: 47mln). Consequently, the interest coverage decreased slightly to ~0.3x (6MFY24: ~-0.4x) with the debt coverage declining to ~0.1x (6MFY24: ~-0.2x)


Capitalization

The Company maintains a low-leveraged capital structure. As of FY24, the Company reported a slightly lower debt-to-capital ratio of ~21.2% (FY23: ~22.4%) due to an increase of ~10.5% in the Company’s equity (FY24: ~PKR 3,327mln, FY23: ~PKR 3,011mln) primarily caused by revaluation gain (FY24: ~PKR 1,245mln, FY23: ~PKR 838mln). On the other hand, as of 6MFY25, the Company reported a leverage ratio of ~27.4% (6MFY24: ~25.9%), with the total borrowings increasing to ~PKR 1,247mln (6MFY24: ~PKR 1,022mln). The Company's borrowing portfolio primarily consists of short-term borrowings (~70.6%) with long-term borrowings and current maturity of long-term debt, each constituting ~14.7% of the borrowing portfolio. Lastly, the Company's equity increased to ~PKR 3,327mln (FY23: ~PKR 3,011mln) due to revaluation gain inflating the reserves to ~PKR 1,245mln (FY23: ~PKR 838mln). As of 6MFY25, the Company's equity was reported at ~PKR 3,308mln.


 
 

Apr-25

www.pacra.com


Dec-24
6M
Jun-24
12M
Jun-23
12M
Jun-22
12M
A. BALANCE SHEET
1. Non-Current Assets 2,748 2,795 2,480 2,559
2. Investments 299 145 129 122
3. Related Party Exposure 927 917 859 658
4. Current Assets 2,578 2,013 1,677 1,967
a. Inventories 1,201 755 689 795
b. Trade Receivables 230 302 235 447
5. Total Assets 6,553 5,870 5,145 5,307
6. Current Liabilities 1,239 889 877 726
a. Trade Payables 249 157 133 90
7. Borrowings 1,247 893 868 933
8. Related Party Exposure 321 321 0 0
9. Non-Current Liabilities 438 441 390 504
10. Net Assets 3,308 3,327 3,011 3,144
11. Shareholders' Equity 3,308 3,327 3,011 3,144
B. INCOME STATEMENT
1. Sales 5,464 11,015 8,399 9,383
a. Cost of Good Sold (5,190) (10,497) (8,164) (8,308)
2. Gross Profit 274 517 234 1,074
a. Operating Expenses (245) (432) (402) (459)
3. Operating Profit 28 86 (168) 615
a. Non Operating Income or (Expense) 91 189 116 84
4. Profit or (Loss) before Interest and Tax 120 275 (52) 699
a. Total Finance Cost (75) (193) (136) (100)
b. Taxation (64) (181) (81) (221)
6. Net Income Or (Loss) (19) (99) (269) 377
C. CASH FLOW STATEMENT
a. Free Cash Flows from Operations (FCFO) 24 62 (168) 590
b. Net Cash from Operating Activities before Working Capital Changes (41) (117) (287) 514
c. Changes in Working Capital (165) (100) 315 (344)
1. Net Cash provided by Operating Activities (207) (217) 28 169
2. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Investing Activities (142) 12 (42) (276)
3. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Financing Activities 354 346 (61) 102
4. Net Cash generated or (Used) during the period 6 141 (75) (5)
D. RATIO ANALYSIS
1. Performance
a. Sales Growth (for the period) -0.8% 31.1% -10.5% 35.5%
b. Gross Profit Margin 5.0% 4.7% 2.8% 11.5%
c. Net Profit Margin -0.3% -0.9% -3.2% 4.0%
d. Cash Conversion Efficiency (FCFO adjusted for Working Capital/Sales) -2.6% -0.3% 1.8% 2.6%
e. Return on Equity [ Net Profit Margin * Asset Turnover * (Total Assets/Shareholders' Equity )] -1.1% -3.1% -8.7% 12.7%
2. Working Capital Management
a. Gross Working Capital (Average Days) 42 33 47 42
b. Net Working Capital (Average Days) 35 28 42 39
c. Current Ratio (Current Assets / Current Liabilities) 2.1 2.3 1.9 2.7
3. Coverages
a. EBITDA / Finance Cost 1.9 1.7 0.3 9.4
b. FCFO / Finance Cost+CMLTB+Excess STB 0.1 0.2 -0.5 2.2
c. Debt Payback (Total Borrowings+Excess STB) / (FCFO-Finance Cost) -3.9 -3.4 -1.6 1.1
4. Capital Structure
a. Total Borrowings / (Total Borrowings+Shareholders' Equity) 27.4% 21.2% 22.4% 22.9%
b. Interest or Markup Payable (Days) 85.8 70.8 97.6 114.6
c. Entity Average Borrowing Rate 13.2% 18.3% 12.7% 7.4%

Apr-25

www.pacra.com

Apr-25

www.pacra.com

  1. Rating Team Statements
    1. Rating is just an opinion about the creditworthiness of the entity and does not constitute a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell any security of the entity rated or to buy, hold, or sell the security rated, as the case may be. (Chapter III; 14-3-(x))
    2. Conflict of Interest
      1. The Rating Team or any of their family members have no interest in this rating (Chapter III; 12-2-(j))
      2. PACRA, the analysts involved in the rating process, and members of its rating committee and their family members do not have any conflict of interest relating to the rating done by them (Chapter III; 12-2-(e) & (k))
      3. The analyst is not a substantial shareholder of the customer being rated by PACRA [Annexure F; d-(ii)]
      4. Explanation: for the purpose of the above clause, the term "family members" shall include only those family members who are dependent on the analyst and members of the rating committee.
  2. Restrictions
    1. No director, officer, or employee of PACRA communicates the information acquired by him for use for rating purposes to any other person, except where required under law to do so. (Chapter III; 10-(5))
    2. PACRA does not disclose or discuss with outside parties or make improper use of the non-public information which has come to its knowledge during a business relationship with the customer. (Chapter III; 10-7-(d))
    3. PACRA does not make proposals or recommendations regarding the activities of rated entities that could impact a credit rating of the entity subject to rating. (Chapter III; 10-7-(k))
  3. Conduct of Business
    1. PACRA fulfills its obligations in a fair, efficient, transparent, and ethical manner and renders high standards of services in performing its functions and obligations. (Chapter III; 11-A-(a))
    2. PACRA uses due care in the preparation of this Rating Report. Our information has been obtained from sources we consider to be reliable, but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. PACRA does not, in every instance, independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing this Rating Report. (Clause 11-(A)(p))
    3. PACRA prohibits its employees and analysts from soliciting money, gifts, or favors from anyone with whom PACRA conducts business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(q))
    4. PACRA ensures before the commencement of the rating process that an analyst or employee has not had a recent employment or other significant business or personal relationship with the rated entity that may cause or may be perceived as causing a conflict of interest. (Chapter III; 11-A-(r))
    5. PACRA maintains the principle of integrity in seeking rating business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(u))
    6. PACRA promptly investigates in the event of misconduct or a breach of the policies, procedures, and controls, and takes appropriate steps to rectify any weaknesses to prevent any recurrence, along with suitable punitive action against the responsible employee(s). (Chapter III; 11-B-(m))
  4. Independence & Conflict of Interest
    1. PACRA receives compensation from the entity being rated or any third party for the rating services it offers. The receipt of this compensation has no influence on PACRA’s opinions or other analytical processes. In all instances, PACRA is committed to preserving the objectivity, integrity, and independence of its ratings. Our relationship is governed by two distinct mandates: i) rating mandate - signed with the entity being rated or issuer of the debt instrument, and ii) fee mandate - signed with the payer, which can be different from the entity.
    2. PACRA does not provide consultancy/advisory services or other services to any of its customers or their associated companies and associated undertakings that are being rated or have been rated by it during the preceding three years, unless it has an adequate mechanism in place ensuring that the provision of such services does not lead to a conflict of interest situation with its rating activities. (Chapter III; 12-2-(d))
    3. PACRA discloses that no shareholder directly or indirectly holding 10% or more of the share capital of PACRA also holds directly or indirectly 10% or more of the share capital of the entity which is subject to rating or the entity which issued the instrument subject to rating by PACRA. (Chapter III; 12-2-(f))
    4. PACRA ensures that the rating assigned to an entity or instrument is not affected by the existence of a business relationship between PACRA and the entity or any other party, or the non-existence of such a relationship. (Chapter III; 12-2-(i))
    5. PACRA ensures that the analysts or any of their family members shall not buy, sell, or engage in any transaction in any security which falls in the analyst’s area of primary analytical responsibility. This clause, however, does not apply to investments in securities through collective investment schemes. (Chapter III; 12-2-(l))
    6. PACRA has established policies and procedures governing investments and trading in securities by its employees and for monitoring the same to prevent insider trading, market manipulation, or any other market abuse. (Chapter III; 11-B-(g))
  5. Monitoring and Review
    1. PACRA monitors all the outstanding ratings continuously, and any potential change therein due to any event associated with the issuer, the security arrangement, the industry, etc., is disseminated to the market immediately and in an effective manner after appropriate consultation with the entity/issuer. (Chapter III; 17-(a))
    2. PACRA reviews all the outstanding ratings periodically on an annual basis. Provided that public dissemination of annual review and in an instance of change in rating will be made. (Chapter III; 17-(b))
    3. PACRA initiates an immediate review of the outstanding rating upon becoming aware of any information that may reasonably be expected to result in downgrading of the rating. (Chapter III; 17-(c))
    4. PACRA engages with the issuer and the debt securities trustee to remain updated on all information pertaining to the rating of the entity/instrument. (Chapter III; 17-(d))
  6. Probability of Default
    1. PACRA’s Rating Scale reflects the expectation of credit risk. The highest rating has the lowest relative likelihood of default (i.e., probability). PACRA’s transition studies capture the historical performance behavior of a specific rating notch. Transition behavior of the assigned rating can be obtained from PACRA’s Transition Study available at our website. (www.pacra.com) However, the actual transition of rating may not follow the pattern observed in the past. (Chapter III; 14-3(f)(vii))
  7. Proprietary Information
    1. All information contained herein is considered proprietary by PACRA. Hence, none of the information in this document can be copied or otherwise reproduced, stored, or disseminated in whole or in part in any form or by any means whatsoever by any person without PACRA’s prior written consent.

Apr-25

www.pacra.com