Rating History
Dissemination Date Long-Term Rating Short-Term Rating Outlook Action Rating Watch
04-Apr-25 BBB+ A2 Stable Maintain -
05-Apr-24 BBB+ A2 Stable Maintain -
05-Apr-23 BBB+ A2 Stable Maintain -
05-Apr-22 BBB+ A2 Stable Maintain -
24-Sep-21 BBB+ A2 Stable Maintain -
About the Entity

Jauharabad Sugar Mills Limited is a public limited company, listed on Pakistan Stock Exchange since 1973. The Company was acquired from Saigol Group in Oct-13 by Cane Processing (Pvt.)Limited. Lately, the Company has increased its operational crushing unit, to 9,500 TCD. The Company is engaged in the manufacturing and sale of refined sugar and its by-products; molasses and bagasse. Jauharabad is majorly owned by a Holding Company - Cane Processing (Pvt.) Limited (~64%) -and individuals of Latif family (~9%). While the Company has a free float of ~34%. The Company's Board is Chaired by Mr. M. Aamir Beg.

Rating Rationale

The assigned ratings affirm Jauharabad Sugar Mills Limited (JSML) as a strong player in Pakistan’s sugar sector. The management pays continuous attention to enhance efficiencies through BMR. The Sponsors' business acumen and support (in the form of loan) remain beneficial for the Company. The market risk Company may face includes fluctuations in sugarcane yields and quality, influenced by agronomic conditions and cyclical variations in crop production. Additionally, raw material price volatility further accentuates operational uncertainty, necessitating supply chain, and cost management. This, in turn, impacts profit margins, leading to net losses. Due to the surplus stocks, the government has allowed the sugar millers to export ~0.79 million MT, ensuring liquidity relief for the industry. With the government's shift to deregulated pricing of sugarcane, the cost of goods sold is expected to decline moving forward, as prices are determined by market forces rather than fixed regulations. This transition to a market-driven pricing model will likely lead to more competitive pricing, encouraging efficiency and cost reduction across industries.
On the financial profile side, JSML derives its revenue from sugar (~98% local market and ~2% export market). During MY24, the Company’s topline has reflected an incline of ~15% YoY, primarily due to increased sugar prices and sales volume. Sugar exports also provided a cushion for sustaining growth. Profitability metrics showed an eroding performance, as gross margin declined by ~18% due to the high procurement cost of sugar cane. Similarly, the operating margin also mirrored the same effect and decline resulting from high operating expenses. JSML achieved profitability during a period when most other sugar companies of a similar scale reported losses. However, net margins were compressed as a result of a decline in net income driven by increased financing expenses in the context of a high-interest-rate environment which needs to be improved in order to compete with industry peers with similar footing. On the other side, Net working days remained elevated due to the accumulation of finished stock. Leverage indicators remain moderate, primarily due to the company's reliance on short-term borrowing and pure equity i.e. PKR ~1.7bln (excluding revaluation of PKR ~6.2bln). Anchored by the Latif family’s strategic oversight, the leadership team leverages decades of expertise to steer the Company through evolving industry dynamics.

Key Rating Drivers

The ratings are dependent upon the management’s ability to sustain business margins, while improving the financial risk profile. Creating diversity in the revenue stream will enhance the Company's profitability. Any significant deterioration in the Company’s margins and/or coverages would have a negative impact on the ratings.

Profile
Legal Structure

Jauharabad Sugar Mills Limited ('Jauharabad Sugar' or 'the Company') was incorporated as a public limited company and is listed on the Pakistan Stock Exchange since 1973.


Background

The Company was established on build, operate and transfer (BOT) contract by Pakistan Industrial Development Corporation (PIDC) in collaboration with Thal Development Authority (TDA). In 1955, Saigol Group acquired the contract and named the Company, Kohinoor Sugar Mills Limited. In Oct 2013, Cane Processing (Pvt.) Ltd. acquired major stakes (~64%) of Kohinoor Sugar Mills and rename it to Jauharabad Sugar.


Operations

Jauharabad Sugar is engaged in the manufacturing and sale of sugar and its by-products molasses, bagasse, and mud. The Company has two sugarcane crushing units, named Line-I and Line-II with a combined sugarcane crushing capacity of 12,500 MT per day. Line I has a sugarcane-crushing capacity of 3,000 MT per day. However, it’s currently not operational. While the Company’s Line-II can crush 9,500 MT enhanced from 7,500 of sugarcane per day. In terms of production performance, Jauharabad recorded sugar production of 64,873 MT during the fiscal year MY24. This marks an increase of ~1% compared to the 64,197 MT produced in MY23, demonstrating a steady improvement in operational efficiency and output. The mill’s capacity utilization remained at ~77% during MY24. The Company operated for 89 crushing days during the year, which is indicative of an efficient operational period. Additionally, the sugar recovery rate, which measures the amount of sugar extracted from the sugar cane, remains stable at ~9.85% in MY24. This improvement in recovery rate can largely be attributed to favorable moisture content in the sugar cane crop, which enhances the efficiency of the extraction process and leads to a higher yield of sugar from the raw material.


Ownership
Ownership Structure

The Company’s majority ownership rests with Cane Processing, a holding company that holds 64% of the shares, while 9% is owned by individuals from the Latif family. Institutional investors, including NIT and ICP, collectively hold 3% of the shares. The remaining 35% constitutes the Company’s free float, allowing for public trading and investor participation. Cane Processing, the principal shareholder, is predominantly controlled by Mrs. Ghazala Amjad, who owns a 99% stake, giving her significant influence over the Company’s strategic direction and decision-making.




Stability

The presence of a holding Company enhances stability by providing long-term strategic direction and financial security. Transferring the entire family stake to the holding company would further consolidate ownership, streamline decision-making, and reinforce the company's structural integrity, ensuring sustained growth and operational efficiency.


Business Acumen

The sponsoring family has a long-standing history in the business world. Mother of Mr. Ahsan Latif (JSML’s Chief Operating Officer), Mrs. Ghazala Amjad hails from the sponsoring family of Kohat Cement. Mr. Ahmad Latif, younger brother of Mr. Ahsan Latif, owns two LPG businesses – named Synergy and Awami.


Financial Strength

The company is primarily owned by Cane Processing, which serves as a strong financial backbone. The sponsors possess sufficient financial strength to support the Company in times of distress, ensuring stability, continuity, and resilience against market fluctuations.


Governance
Board Structure

The Company's Board comprises two Executive Directors, three Independent Directors, and two Non-Executive Directors nominated by Cane Processing. The Board is chaired by an Independent Director, ensuring balanced governance and oversight. Its composition, which emphasizes independence and diverse expertise, strengthens decision-making and enhances strategic direction.


Members’ Profile

The Board's Chairman, Mr. M. Aamir Beg is associated with the Company for 7 years and has a thirty seven years of practical experience in the fields of Marketing and new projects development. He is a qualified M.B.A from Liverpool University, England in 1981. Mr. Ghias-ul-Hasan, Non-executive Director/ CPL Nominee, is an entrepreneur with forty four years’ experience, has led number of businesses in Pakistan including Manufacturing, Trading and Advertising. His work experience and Managerial ability is one of the key success factors for the Company. The Board's experience and skillset is the key success factors for the Company.


Board Effectiveness

During MY24, the Board met four times, with majority attendance, maintaining well documented minutes. The Board has two subcommittees: Audit Committee (met 4 times during MY23) and HR & Remuneration Committee (met once during MY24).


Financial Transparency

External auditors, UHY Hassan Naeem & Company, Chartered Accountants, have expressed an unqualified opinion on the financial statements of MY24. The firm has been QCR rated and is in Category 'A' of SBP panel.


Management
Organizational Structure

The Company operates through eight key divisions: Mill, Operations, Power, Cane, Marketing, Human Resources, Internal Audit, and Finance. All functional heads report directly to the Chief Operating Officer (COO), who, in turn, reports to the Chief Executive Officer (CEO). However, to ensure independent oversight, the Head of Internal Audit reports functionally to the Board Audit Committee while maintaining an administrative reporting line to the CEO. This structure promotes operational efficiency, accountability, and robust internal controls.


Management Team

Mr. Syed Anwar Hussain Shahid, the CEO, a renowned Sugar Technologist having a vast experience of forty one years in the erection and commissioning sugar plants, Technical Supervision indecision about plant expansion, equipment selection and project exposure. He is associated with the Company since 2021. He is responsible for overseeing technical matters of JSML sugar operations. Mr. Ahsan Latif, the COO, has work experience of 24 years and is associated with the Company since 2013. The management team has substantial experience in the relevant domain.


Effectiveness

The Company’s management ensures operational effectiveness through a Management Committee, which includes the heads of all divisions. Daily coordination meetings are conducted to facilitate communication, align strategies, and address key operational matters. The minutes of these meetings are systematically documented and circulated to ensure accountability, track progress, and follow up on action items, fostering a structured and efficient decision-making process.


MIS

The Company uses ERP system which is updated on real time basis and generates 15 reports to assist the top management in monitoring and evaluating the performance.


Control Environment

The Internal Audit function is co-sourced with KPMG, ensuring a robust and independent review process. This function plays a vital role in providing support, guidance, and oversight for the internally established Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs). Additionally, KPMG conducts gap analyses of existing systems and policies, identifying areas for improvement and ensuring compliance with best practices, thereby strengthening the company’s internal controls and risk management framework.


Business Risk
Industry Dynamics

Pakistan’s sugar industry stands as the second-largest agro-based sector in the country, comprising approximately90 mills with an annual crushing capacity of 80-90 million MT. Despite its scale, the industry faces persistentchallenges, particularly due to the Government-regulated sugarcane support prices, which are set based onfarmer’s costs and often constrain millers' profitability. In MY23, sugar production declined by approximately 15%,reaching 6.7million MT, primarily due to the devastating floods that damaged standing crops and reduced therecovery rate. To manage the surplus inventory, the Government permitted the export of 0.5 million MT of sugar,offering some relief to the industry. The current MY24 season also reflects the lingering effects of flash floods, with a 4.7% loss in cultivated area. Despite these setbacks, sugar production is estimated to recover slightly toaround 7 million MT. The Government’s continued support for exports is expected to provide a much-needed boostto millers, helping them navigate challenging industry dynamics and mitigate financial pressures.


Relative Position

The Company contributed approximately ~0.955% to the total production of sugar produced in Pakistan.


Revenues

The Company generates revenue by selling refined sugar in the local markets (~97%) the export market (~3%). Sale of molasses (~12.3%), bagasse (~1.4%), and mud (~0.14%) also account for the Company’s total turnover. During MY24, the Company's topline increased by ~15.4%, reporting to PKR 7.9 billion compared to PKR 6.9 billion in the corresponding period of the previous year MY23. This growth was driven by an increase in the sale price per kg, which rose from PKR 91/kg in MY23 to PKR 112/kg in MY24. Looking ahead, revenue stability is anticipated, underpinned by resilient local market demand for sugar. Additionally, the Company's financial performance improved due to sugar exports, amounting to PKR 242mln, which contributed positively to its results.


Margins

The Company's profitability margins reflect a deteriorated performance during MY24. The gross profit margin fell to ~12.6% (MY23: ~15.5%). This decline was primarily driven by a substantial increase in the procurement cost of sugarcane, which had a direct negative impact on the cost of production. Higher sugarcane costs reduced the overall margin from the core business operations, making it more difficult to sustain profitability at the same levels as in the previous year. This translated into a shrinking Operating profit margin (~9.3%, down from ~12%). Moreover, during MY24, the net profit margin contracted to 0.02% from ~3.1%. This decline is primarily attributed to a decline in the net income during the year. Additionally, the decline is primarily attributed to a substantial increase in finance costs, which rose to ~69.4%, reflecting the impact of elevated borrowing costs in a high-interest-rate environment.


Sustainability

Going forward, the Company aims to capitalize on the benefits of its recently installed 14.44 MW bagasse-based power plant, bringing the total power generation capacity, including the existing 7 MW plant, to 21.44 MW.


Financial Risk
Working capital

The Company’s working capital management has shown signs of operational inefficiencies during MY24. Inventories witnessed an increase, averaging 101 days compared to 82 days in MY23, driven by high levels of finished goods. Trade receivables remain negligible at 1 day on average, underscoring the Company’s efficient receivables collection practices. However, trade payables averaged 6 days, from 7 days in MY23, indicating improved utilization of supplier credit. Despite this, the Gross Working Capital cycle lengthened to 102 days (MY23: 82 days), resulting in a Net Working Capital cycle of 88 days compared to 77 days in the previous period. Leverage indicators present a stable picture, with Short-Term Total Leverage remaining neutral at -0.8% (MY23: 2.8%) and Short-Term Trade Leverage recorded to -16.5% from -16%, reflecting less dependency on short-term trade credit. Going Forward, the working capital cycle is expected to improve due to the efficient selling of stock through export.


Coverages

The Company's coverage indicators reflect a mixed performance during MY24, highlighting challenges in its financial risk profile. The EBITDA-to-Finance Cost ratio has declined to 1.3x (MY23: 2.1x), signaling a reduced capacity to cover finance costs through operational earnings. Similarly, the FCFO-to-Finance Cost ratio has weakened to 1.1x from 1.9x, indicating tighter cash flow coverage of financial obligations. Debt repayment timelines have lengthened (12.2x from 1.8x) due to weaker cash flow generation, highlighting the need for improved financial efficiency. Going forward, coverages are expected to ease resulting due to lower finance cost.


Capitalization

JSML maintains a low-leveraged capital structure, which is a good sign in comparison to other industry players, with a debt-to-equity ratio standing at ~33.9% in MY24 (MY23: ~21.2%). The Company's debt consists of short-term borrowings, constituting ~99%, and long term borrowing, constituting lease liabilities of ~1% of the total debt. In MY24, the total debt of the Company stood at PKR 2,848mln due to increased utilization for running finance for working capital purposes and repayment of loan. The equity base of the Company stood at ~PKR 7,958mln (MY23: ~PKR 7,990mln).


 
 

Apr-25

www.pacra.com


Dec-24
3M
Sep-24
12M
Sep-23
12M
Sep-22
12M
A. BALANCE SHEET
1. Non-Current Assets 10,272 10,278 9,818 9,517
2. Investments 115 15 15 19
3. Related Party Exposure 0 0 0 0
4. Current Assets 3,820 4,052 2,404 2,264
a. Inventories 2,029 2,902 1,525 1,573
b. Trade Receivables 403 53 6 6
5. Total Assets 14,208 14,344 12,237 11,801
6. Current Liabilities 1,083 1,398 1,075 855
a. Trade Payables 400 516 122 75
7. Borrowings 2,848 2,704 1,279 1,170
8. Related Party Exposure 1,384 1,384 875 909
9. Non-Current Liabilities 887 901 1,018 1,054
10. Net Assets 8,005 7,958 7,990 7,812
11. Shareholders' Equity 8,005 7,958 7,990 7,812
B. INCOME STATEMENT
1. Sales 2,767 7,996 6,926 5,180
a. Cost of Good Sold (2,581) (6,987) (5,852) (4,352)
2. Gross Profit 187 1,009 1,074 829
a. Operating Expenses (59) (262) (241) (220)
3. Operating Profit 127 747 833 609
a. Non Operating Income or (Expense) (5) 168 (6) (4)
4. Profit or (Loss) before Interest and Tax 123 916 826 605
a. Total Finance Cost (57) (949) (560) (334)
b. Taxation (19) 35 (54) (143)
6. Net Income Or (Loss) 47 2 212 128
C. CASH FLOW STATEMENT
a. Free Cash Flows from Operations (FCFO) 192 1,054 1,039 701
b. Net Cash from Operating Activities before Working Capital Changes 54 125 520 424
c. Changes in Working Capital 4 (1,118) 88 (1,036)
1. Net Cash provided by Operating Activities 58 (993) 608 (612)
2. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Investing Activities (75) (765) (603) (344)
3. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Financing Activities (0) 473 (83) (44)
4. Net Cash generated or (Used) during the period (17) (1,285) (78) (999)
D. RATIO ANALYSIS
1. Performance
a. Sales Growth (for the period) 38.4% 15.5% 33.7% 5.2%
b. Gross Profit Margin 6.7% 12.6% 15.5% 16.0%
c. Net Profit Margin 1.7% 0.0% 3.1% 2.5%
d. Cash Conversion Efficiency (FCFO adjusted for Working Capital/Sales) 7.1% -0.8% 16.3% -6.5%
e. Return on Equity [ Net Profit Margin * Asset Turnover * (Total Assets/Shareholders' Equity )] 2.4% 0.0% 2.7% 2.1%
2. Working Capital Management
a. Gross Working Capital (Average Days) 89 102 82 59
b. Net Working Capital (Average Days) 74 88 77 55
c. Current Ratio (Current Assets / Current Liabilities) 3.5 2.9 2.2 2.6
3. Coverages
a. EBITDA / Finance Cost 3.6 1.3 2.1 2.4
b. FCFO / Finance Cost+CMLTB+Excess STB 3.4 1.1 1.9 2.1
c. Debt Payback (Total Borrowings+Excess STB) / (FCFO-Finance Cost) 2.5 12.2 1.8 2.4
4. Capital Structure
a. Total Borrowings / (Total Borrowings+Shareholders' Equity) 34.6% 33.9% 21.2% 21.0%
b. Interest or Markup Payable (Days) 59.1 45.9 66.4 67.5
c. Entity Average Borrowing Rate 4.2% 19.0% 16.0% 11.7%

Apr-25

www.pacra.com

Apr-25

www.pacra.com

  1. Rating Team Statements
    1. Rating is just an opinion about the creditworthiness of the entity and does not constitute a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell any security of the entity rated or to buy, hold, or sell the security rated, as the case may be. (Chapter III; 14-3-(x))
    2. Conflict of Interest
      1. The Rating Team or any of their family members have no interest in this rating (Chapter III; 12-2-(j))
      2. PACRA, the analysts involved in the rating process, and members of its rating committee and their family members do not have any conflict of interest relating to the rating done by them (Chapter III; 12-2-(e) & (k))
      3. The analyst is not a substantial shareholder of the customer being rated by PACRA [Annexure F; d-(ii)]
      4. Explanation: for the purpose of the above clause, the term "family members" shall include only those family members who are dependent on the analyst and members of the rating committee.
  2. Restrictions
    1. No director, officer, or employee of PACRA communicates the information acquired by him for use for rating purposes to any other person, except where required under law to do so. (Chapter III; 10-(5))
    2. PACRA does not disclose or discuss with outside parties or make improper use of the non-public information which has come to its knowledge during a business relationship with the customer. (Chapter III; 10-7-(d))
    3. PACRA does not make proposals or recommendations regarding the activities of rated entities that could impact a credit rating of the entity subject to rating. (Chapter III; 10-7-(k))
  3. Conduct of Business
    1. PACRA fulfills its obligations in a fair, efficient, transparent, and ethical manner and renders high standards of services in performing its functions and obligations. (Chapter III; 11-A-(a))
    2. PACRA uses due care in the preparation of this Rating Report. Our information has been obtained from sources we consider to be reliable, but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. PACRA does not, in every instance, independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing this Rating Report. (Clause 11-(A)(p))
    3. PACRA prohibits its employees and analysts from soliciting money, gifts, or favors from anyone with whom PACRA conducts business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(q))
    4. PACRA ensures before the commencement of the rating process that an analyst or employee has not had a recent employment or other significant business or personal relationship with the rated entity that may cause or may be perceived as causing a conflict of interest. (Chapter III; 11-A-(r))
    5. PACRA maintains the principle of integrity in seeking rating business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(u))
    6. PACRA promptly investigates in the event of misconduct or a breach of the policies, procedures, and controls, and takes appropriate steps to rectify any weaknesses to prevent any recurrence, along with suitable punitive action against the responsible employee(s). (Chapter III; 11-B-(m))
  4. Independence & Conflict of Interest
    1. PACRA receives compensation from the entity being rated or any third party for the rating services it offers. The receipt of this compensation has no influence on PACRA’s opinions or other analytical processes. In all instances, PACRA is committed to preserving the objectivity, integrity, and independence of its ratings. Our relationship is governed by two distinct mandates: i) rating mandate - signed with the entity being rated or issuer of the debt instrument, and ii) fee mandate - signed with the payer, which can be different from the entity.
    2. PACRA does not provide consultancy/advisory services or other services to any of its customers or their associated companies and associated undertakings that are being rated or have been rated by it during the preceding three years, unless it has an adequate mechanism in place ensuring that the provision of such services does not lead to a conflict of interest situation with its rating activities. (Chapter III; 12-2-(d))
    3. PACRA discloses that no shareholder directly or indirectly holding 10% or more of the share capital of PACRA also holds directly or indirectly 10% or more of the share capital of the entity which is subject to rating or the entity which issued the instrument subject to rating by PACRA. (Chapter III; 12-2-(f))
    4. PACRA ensures that the rating assigned to an entity or instrument is not affected by the existence of a business relationship between PACRA and the entity or any other party, or the non-existence of such a relationship. (Chapter III; 12-2-(i))
    5. PACRA ensures that the analysts or any of their family members shall not buy, sell, or engage in any transaction in any security which falls in the analyst’s area of primary analytical responsibility. This clause, however, does not apply to investments in securities through collective investment schemes. (Chapter III; 12-2-(l))
    6. PACRA has established policies and procedures governing investments and trading in securities by its employees and for monitoring the same to prevent insider trading, market manipulation, or any other market abuse. (Chapter III; 11-B-(g))
  5. Monitoring and Review
    1. PACRA monitors all the outstanding ratings continuously, and any potential change therein due to any event associated with the issuer, the security arrangement, the industry, etc., is disseminated to the market immediately and in an effective manner after appropriate consultation with the entity/issuer. (Chapter III; 17-(a))
    2. PACRA reviews all the outstanding ratings periodically on an annual basis. Provided that public dissemination of annual review and in an instance of change in rating will be made. (Chapter III; 17-(b))
    3. PACRA initiates an immediate review of the outstanding rating upon becoming aware of any information that may reasonably be expected to result in downgrading of the rating. (Chapter III; 17-(c))
    4. PACRA engages with the issuer and the debt securities trustee to remain updated on all information pertaining to the rating of the entity/instrument. (Chapter III; 17-(d))
  6. Probability of Default
    1. PACRA’s Rating Scale reflects the expectation of credit risk. The highest rating has the lowest relative likelihood of default (i.e., probability). PACRA’s transition studies capture the historical performance behavior of a specific rating notch. Transition behavior of the assigned rating can be obtained from PACRA’s Transition Study available at our website. (www.pacra.com) However, the actual transition of rating may not follow the pattern observed in the past. (Chapter III; 14-3(f)(vii))
  7. Proprietary Information
    1. All information contained herein is considered proprietary by PACRA. Hence, none of the information in this document can be copied or otherwise reproduced, stored, or disseminated in whole or in part in any form or by any means whatsoever by any person without PACRA’s prior written consent.

Apr-25

www.pacra.com