Rating History
Dissemination Date Long-Term Rating Short-Term Rating Outlook Action Rating Watch
09-Apr-25 A+ A1 Stable Maintain -
09-Apr-24 A+ A1 Stable Maintain -
10-Apr-23 A+ A1 Stable Maintain -
11-Apr-22 A+ A1 Stable Maintain -
12-Apr-21 A+ A1 Stable Maintain -
About the Entity

Al-Abbas Sugar Mills Limited was incorporated in May-91 and is listed on the PSX. The Company has diversified businesses of sugar, ethanol and storage tank terminal. The installed capacities are a) Sugar - crushing at 8,500 TCD, b) Distillery to produce 170,000liters of ethanol per day, and c) Storage tank terminal with a capacity of 22,850 M.T per month. Majority (~58%) of Al-Abbas Sugar's shareholding lies with Haji Ghani Group, which enjoys strong presence on the Board and has management control. Jahangir Siddiqui (JS) Group (~29%) is the other major shareholder. Mr. Muhammad Suleman Chawla is the Chairman of the Board, whereas, Mr. Asim Ghani serves as the Company's Chief Executive

Rating Rationale

The assigned ratings affirm Al-Abbas Sugar Mills Limited (AASML) as a strong player in Pakistan’s sugar and ethanol sectors. The assigned ratings also factor in diversified revenue streams emanating from sugar, ethanol, and storage facilities. Storage tank terminals provide an additional cushion to cashflows. This provides a competitive advantage to the Company mitigating volatility and industry-specific risks. Moreover, a strong governance framework bodes well for the Company. The market risk Company may face includes fluctuations in sugarcane yields and quality, influenced by agronomic conditions and cyclical variations in crop production. Additionally, raw material price volatility further accentuates operational uncertainty, necessitating supply chain, and cost management. This, in turn, impacts profit margins, leading to net losses. Due to the surplus stocks, the government has allowed the sugar millers to export ~0.79 million MT, ensuring liquidity relief for the industry. With the government's shift to deregulated pricing of sugarcane, the cost of goods sold is expected to decline moving forward, as prices are determined by market forces rather than fixed regulations. This transition to a market driven pricing model will likely lead to more competitive pricing, encouraging efficiency and cost reduction across industries. On the financial profile side, AASML’s strategically diversified revenue mix of 69% from ethanol, 29.3% from sugar, and 1.7% from other reportable segments. Major revenue is derived from ethanol (~98% export market) and from sugar (~4% export and ~96% local market). During MY24, the Company’s topline recorded an increase of ~13.3%, driven primarily by higher sugar and ethanol prices, along with increased sales volume. Sugar exports also provided a cushion for sustaining growth. Profitability metrics showed an eroding performance, as gross margin declined by ~35% due to the high procurement cost of sugar cane. Similarly, the operating margin also mirrored the same effect and decline resulting from high operating expenses. Meanwhile, net margins were also compressed by ~63% as a result of a decline in net income driven by increased financing expenses in the context of a high-interest-rate environment. However, AASML recorded profits in a period when most other sugar companies of a similar scale recorded losses. On the other side, Net working days remained elevated due to the accumulation of finished stock. Leverage indicators remain moderate, primarily due to the Company's reliance on short-term borrowing constituting ~99% of the total debt. Anchored by the Haji Ghani family’s strategic oversight, the leadership team leverages decades of expertise to steer the Company through evolving industry dynamics.

Key Rating Drivers

The ratings are dependent on the Company's ability to sustain margins with healthy coverages while maintaining necessary cushion and discipline in working capital management. Significant deterioration of relationship among shareholders leading to adverse impact on the Company's profile and/or excessive borrowings deteriorating the coverages will impact the ratings.

Profile
Legal Structure

Al-Abbas Sugar Mills Limited (‘Al-Abbas Sugar’ or ‘the Company’) is a public listed company, incorporated in May 1991.


Background

The company began its journey with the manufacturing and sale of white refined sugar, commencing commercial operations in December 1993. Expanding its business portfolio, the company established its first distillery plant (Unit I) in 2000, followed by a second unit (Unit II) in 2004, enhancing its ethanol production capacity. To further strengthen its supply chain and operational efficiency, the company later developed storage terminals, ensuring better inventory management and logistical support.


Operations

The Company's has a rated crushing capacity stands at 8,500 TCD and the distilleries have a combined capacity to produce 170,000 liters of Ethanol per day (Unit I: 85,000 Liters; Unit II: 85,000 Liters). The Company has diversified businesses and operates in two different locations at Mirpurkhas and Dhabeji in Sindh. The businesses include a) Sugar, b) Ethanol c) Chemicals and Alloys and d) Tank Terminal. In terms of production performance, Al-Abbas sugar recorded sugar production of 50,184 MT during the fiscal year MY24. This marks an increase of ~18% compared to the 42,175 MT produced in MY23, demonstrating a steady improvement in operational efficiency and output. The Company operated for 83 crushing days during the year, which is indicative of an efficient operational period. Additionally, the sugar recovery rate, which measures the amount of sugar extracted from the sugar cane, remains stable at ~10.26% in MY24. This improvement in recovery rate can largely be attributed to favorable moisture content in the sugar cane crop, which enhances the efficiency of the extraction process and leads to a higher yield of sugar from the raw material. The ethanol segment recorded the production of 43,603 MT ~3.6% lower than 45,250 MT as compared to previous year. The Company also operates 12 tanks, having a combined storage capacity of 22,850 MT per month to store ethanol and petroleum products.


Ownership
Ownership Structure

The majority shareholding in the company is held by the Haji Ghani family and its associates, who own 33%, followed by the Jahangir Siddiqui (JS) Group with 29%. Additionally, 10% of the Company’s shares are publicly traded, contributing to market liquidity and investor participation.


Stability

The two major shareholders of the Company are involved in a long standing dispute since 2013. Legal proceedings in this regard are being carried out in Sindh High Court and outcome is pending. However, the management believes that the case will be decided in the favor of the Company


Business Acumen

The sponsors, Haji Ghani Group, have a strong and established business track record. Mr. Haji Abdul Ghani brings extensive experience, having chaired the Boards of various brokerage firms and previously serving as the Vice Chairman of the Pakistan Stock Exchange. Additionally, the Haji Ghani Group has a diversified business background, with prior involvement in the cement sector, further demonstrating its expertise in managing and expanding industrial ventures.




Financial Strength

The Company is the flagship entity of Haji Ghani Group and has maintained stable profits over the years supported by a sufficient equity base of PKR 8bln as at Sep-24. Moreover, the group serves as a strong financial backbone. The sponsors possess sufficient financial strength to support the Company in times of distress, ensuring stability, continuity, and resilience against market fluctuations.


Governance
Board Structure

The Board of Directors (BoD) consists of nine members, including one Executive Director and three Non-Executive Directors. It also includes three Independent Directors and two Female Directors, ensuring diversity and governance balance. The BoD is chaired by a Non-Executive Director and is predominantly influenced by the Haji Ghani Family, which holds a strong presence through five Nominee Directors.


Members’ Profile

The Board of Directors (BoD) comprises highly experienced members with strong professional backgrounds, specializing in financial services as well as the sugar and ethanol industries. Their collective expertise enhances strategic decision-making and corporate governance. Mr. Muhammad Suleman Chawla currently serves as the Chairman of the BoD, providing leadership and oversight to the board’s functions.  


Board Effectiveness

The Board of Directors (BoD) is supported by three key committees: the Audit Committee, the HR & Remuneration Committee, and the Risk Management Committee. Mr. Haroon Askari, an Independent Director, chairs both the Audit and HR & Remuneration Committees, ensuring transparency and effective governance. Meanwhile, the Risk Management Committee is chaired by Mr. Salman Hussain Chawala, also an Independent Director, overseeing risk assessment and mitigation strategies to safeguard the company's financial and operational stability.


Financial Transparency

BDO Ebrahim & Co. Chartered Accountants as Company's external auditors. The firm is classified in category ‘A’ of SBP and have a satisfactory QCR rating. They have expressed an unqualified opinion on the financial statements for the year ending in Sep-24.


Management
Organizational Structure

Al-Abbas Sugar has a well-defined organizational structure, ensuring efficient management and clear reporting lines. Department heads report directly to the CEO, facilitating streamlined decision-making and accountability. The company operates through five key departments: Finance, Administration & Human Resources, Procurement & Purchase, Audit, and Plant Operations, each playing a crucial role in maintaining operational efficiency and business growth.


Management Team

Mr. Asim Ghani has been serving as the CEO since December 2017. Prior to this role, he oversaw the operational aspects of Al-Abbas as an Executive Director and has been associated with the company for 23 years, bringing extensive industry experience and leadership. Similarly, Mr. Samir Hajani, the Chief Financial Officer, has been with the company for the past 11 years, contributing to its financial stability and strategic growth. The long-standing association of the senior management ensures policy consistency, operational continuity, and a strengthened management structure.


Effectiveness

The long association of the Company’s senior management ensures consistency in overall policies and strengthens the management structure.


MIS

The Company has deployed Oracle R-12 as its ERP system, enabling it to generate various reports for effective management and decision making.


Control Environment

The Internal Audit Department upholds compliance and operational efficiency by conducting quarterly evaluations to assess risks, controls, and adherence to policies. The findings are reported to the Audit Committee, ensuring transparency, accountability, and continuous improvement in governance and internal processes.


Business Risk
Industry Dynamics

Pakistan’s sugar industry stands as the second-largest agro-based sector in the country, comprising approximately90 mills with an annual crushing capacity of 80-90 million MT. Despite its scale, the industry faces persistentchallenges, particularly due to the Government-regulated sugarcane support prices, which are set based onfarmer’s costs and often constrain millers' profitability. In MY23, sugar production declined by approximately 15%,reaching 6.7million MT, primarily due to the devastating floods that damaged standing crops and reduced therecovery rate. To manage the surplus inventory, the Government permitted the export of 0.5 million MT of sugar,offering some relief to the industry. The current MY24 season also reflects the lingering effects of flash floods, with a 4.7% loss in cultivated area. Despite these setbacks, sugar production is estimated to recover slightly toaround 7 million MT. The Government’s continued support for exports is expected to provide a much-needed boostto millers, helping them navigate challenging industry dynamics and mitigate financial pressures.


Relative Position

Owing to numerous industry players, companies relatively have low market share. Al-Abbas Sugar contributes ~ 0.7% to the total sugar production and~ 6% to the total ethanol production of Pakistan.


Revenues

The Company generates revenue by manufacturing and selling sugar (~28%) and ethanol (~72%). A geographical split of revenue indicates that ~30% is generated from the local market, while the remaining ~70% originates from exports. During MY24, the Company's total topline increased by ~13%, reporting to PKR 16 billion compared to PKR 14 billion in the corresponding period of the previous year MY23. Out of this revenue from sugar recorded at PKR 4.2bln (MY23: PKR 3.8bln) and revenue from ethanol recorded at PKR 11bln (MY23: PKR 10.2bln) This growth was driven by an increase in the sale price per kg, which rose from PKR 91/kg in MY23 to PKR 112/kg in MY24. Looking ahead, revenue stability is anticipated, underpinned by resilient local market demand for sugar. Additionally, the Company's financial performance improved due to sugar exports, amounting to PKR 11,440mln, which contributed positively to its results.


Margins

The Company's profitability margins reflect a deteriorated performance during MY24. The gross profit margin fell to ~21.9% (MY23: ~34.1%). This decline was primarily driven by a substantial increase in the procurement cost of sugarcane, which had a direct negative impact on the cost of production. Higher sugarcane costs reduced the overall margin from the core business operations, making it more difficult to sustain profitability at the same levels as in the previous year. This translated into a shrinking Operating profit margin (~13.4%, down from ~30.2%). Moreover, during MY24, the net profit margin contracted to 9.4% from ~25.3%. This decline is primarily attributed to a decline in the net income during the year. Additionally, the decline is primarily attributed to a substantial increase in finance costs, which rose to ~36.8%, reflecting the impact of elevated borrowing costs in a high-interest-rate environment.


Sustainability

Going forward, the Company performance will largely depend on the sugar division, and its industry dynamics. Meanwhile, the Company is expected to continue it’s stable performance in ethanol division.


Financial Risk
Working capital

The Company’s working capital management has shown signs of operational inefficiencies during MY24. Inventories witnessed an increase, averaging 98 days compared to 87 days in MY23, driven by high levels of finished goods. Trade receivables remain negligible at 10 day on average, underscoring the Company’s efficient receivables collection practices. However, trade payables averaged 24 days, from 26 days in MY23, indicating adequate utilization of supplier credit. Despite this, the Gross Working Capital cycle lengthened to 108 days (MY23: 96 days), resulting in a Net Working Capital cycle of 84 days compared to 70 days in the previous period. Leverage indicators present a stable picture, with Short-Term Total Leverage remaining neutral at 62% (MY23: 51%) and Short-Term Trade Leverage recorded to 58% from 35%, reflecting more room to borrow against trade assets. Going Forward, the working capital cycle is expected to improve due to the efficient selling of stock through export.


Coverages

The Company's coverage indicators reflect a mixed performance during MY24, highlighting challenges in its financial risk profile. The EBITDA-to-Finance Cost ratio has declined to 4.8x (MY23: 12.5x), signaling a reduced capacity to cover finance costs through operational earnings. Similarly, the FCFO-to-Finance Cost ratio has weakened to 3.7x from 11.4x, indicating tighter cash flow coverage of financial obligations. Debt repayment timelines remains (0.0x from 0.0x) reflecting Company’s ability to timely payoff its obligations. Going forward, coverages are expected to ease resulting due to lower finance cost.


Capitalization

Al-Abbas Sugar Mills maintains a low-leveraged capital structure, which is a good sign in comparison to other industry players, with a debt-to-equity ratio standing at ~24.4% in MY24 (MY23: ~28.5%). The Company's debt consists of short-term borrowings, constituting ~99%, and long term borrowing, constituting lease liabilities of ~1% of the total debt. In MY24, the total debt of the Company stood at PKR 2,584mln due to increased utilization for running finance for working capital purposes and repayment of loan. The equity base of the Company stood at ~PKR 8,001mln (MY23: ~PKR 6,923mln).


 
 

Apr-25

www.pacra.com


Dec-24
3M
Sep-24
12M
Sep-23
12M
Sep-22
12M
A. BALANCE SHEET
1. Non-Current Assets 1,422 1,435 1,466 1,491
2. Investments 4,382 1,343 2,769 1,788
3. Related Party Exposure 0 0 0 0
4. Current Assets 6,969 9,368 8,211 6,092
a. Inventories 3,508 5,024 3,839 3,103
b. Trade Receivables 542 641 253 457
5. Total Assets 12,773 12,147 12,446 9,371
6. Current Liabilities 2,035 1,496 2,632 1,761
a. Trade Payables 1,451 1,066 1,090 1,011
7. Borrowings 2,455 2,584 2,763 2,984
8. Related Party Exposure 0 0 0 0
9. Non-Current Liabilities 66 64 127 20
10. Net Assets 8,217 8,002 6,923 4,606
11. Shareholders' Equity 8,217 8,001 6,923 4,606
B. INCOME STATEMENT
1. Sales 4,774 16,508 14,569 10,362
a. Cost of Good Sold (4,350) (12,896) (9,594) (8,023)
2. Gross Profit 424 3,612 4,975 2,339
a. Operating Expenses (169) (1,392) (571) (378)
3. Operating Profit 255 2,219 4,404 1,961
a. Non Operating Income or (Expense) 77 70 (21) 259
4. Profit or (Loss) before Interest and Tax 332 2,289 4,382 2,220
a. Total Finance Cost (84) (509) (378) (169)
b. Taxation (84) (230) (320) (137)
6. Net Income Or (Loss) 164 1,551 3,685 1,914
C. CASH FLOW STATEMENT
a. Free Cash Flows from Operations (FCFO) 222 1,863 4,147 1,866
b. Net Cash from Operating Activities before Working Capital Changes 168 1,482 3,985 1,783
c. Changes in Working Capital 2,991 (2,171) (1,311) (1,407)
1. Net Cash provided by Operating Activities 3,160 (690) 2,674 376
2. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Investing Activities (2,877) 1,430 (1,061) (566)
3. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Financing Activities (131) (723) (1,609) 193
4. Net Cash generated or (Used) during the period 152 18 4 3
D. RATIO ANALYSIS
1. Performance
a. Sales Growth (for the period) 15.7% 13.3% 40.6% 40.4%
b. Gross Profit Margin 8.9% 21.9% 34.1% 22.6%
c. Net Profit Margin 3.4% 9.4% 25.3% 18.5%
d. Cash Conversion Efficiency (FCFO adjusted for Working Capital/Sales) 67.3% -1.9% 19.5% 4.4%
e. Return on Equity [ Net Profit Margin * Asset Turnover * (Total Assets/Shareholders' Equity )] 8.1% 20.8% 63.9% 48.0%
2. Working Capital Management
a. Gross Working Capital (Average Days) 93 108 96 104
b. Net Working Capital (Average Days) 69 84 70 69
c. Current Ratio (Current Assets / Current Liabilities) 3.4 6.3 3.1 3.5
3. Coverages
a. EBITDA / Finance Cost 3.8 4.8 12.5 13.4
b. FCFO / Finance Cost+CMLTB+Excess STB 2.6 3.7 11.2 9.8
c. Debt Payback (Total Borrowings+Excess STB) / (FCFO-Finance Cost) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
4. Capital Structure
a. Total Borrowings / (Total Borrowings+Shareholders' Equity) 23.0% 24.4% 28.5% 39.3%
b. Interest or Markup Payable (Days) 50.9 11.3 49.6 55.0
c. Entity Average Borrowing Rate 12.3% 18.2% 12.6% 5.4%

Apr-25

www.pacra.com

Apr-25

www.pacra.com

  1. Rating Team Statements
    1. Rating is just an opinion about the creditworthiness of the entity and does not constitute a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell any security of the entity rated or to buy, hold, or sell the security rated, as the case may be. (Chapter III; 14-3-(x))
    2. Conflict of Interest
      1. The Rating Team or any of their family members have no interest in this rating (Chapter III; 12-2-(j))
      2. PACRA, the analysts involved in the rating process, and members of its rating committee and their family members do not have any conflict of interest relating to the rating done by them (Chapter III; 12-2-(e) & (k))
      3. The analyst is not a substantial shareholder of the customer being rated by PACRA [Annexure F; d-(ii)]
      4. Explanation: for the purpose of the above clause, the term "family members" shall include only those family members who are dependent on the analyst and members of the rating committee.
  2. Restrictions
    1. No director, officer, or employee of PACRA communicates the information acquired by him for use for rating purposes to any other person, except where required under law to do so. (Chapter III; 10-(5))
    2. PACRA does not disclose or discuss with outside parties or make improper use of the non-public information which has come to its knowledge during a business relationship with the customer. (Chapter III; 10-7-(d))
    3. PACRA does not make proposals or recommendations regarding the activities of rated entities that could impact a credit rating of the entity subject to rating. (Chapter III; 10-7-(k))
  3. Conduct of Business
    1. PACRA fulfills its obligations in a fair, efficient, transparent, and ethical manner and renders high standards of services in performing its functions and obligations. (Chapter III; 11-A-(a))
    2. PACRA uses due care in the preparation of this Rating Report. Our information has been obtained from sources we consider to be reliable, but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. PACRA does not, in every instance, independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing this Rating Report. (Clause 11-(A)(p))
    3. PACRA prohibits its employees and analysts from soliciting money, gifts, or favors from anyone with whom PACRA conducts business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(q))
    4. PACRA ensures before the commencement of the rating process that an analyst or employee has not had a recent employment or other significant business or personal relationship with the rated entity that may cause or may be perceived as causing a conflict of interest. (Chapter III; 11-A-(r))
    5. PACRA maintains the principle of integrity in seeking rating business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(u))
    6. PACRA promptly investigates in the event of misconduct or a breach of the policies, procedures, and controls, and takes appropriate steps to rectify any weaknesses to prevent any recurrence, along with suitable punitive action against the responsible employee(s). (Chapter III; 11-B-(m))
  4. Independence & Conflict of Interest
    1. PACRA receives compensation from the entity being rated or any third party for the rating services it offers. The receipt of this compensation has no influence on PACRA’s opinions or other analytical processes. In all instances, PACRA is committed to preserving the objectivity, integrity, and independence of its ratings. Our relationship is governed by two distinct mandates: i) rating mandate - signed with the entity being rated or issuer of the debt instrument, and ii) fee mandate - signed with the payer, which can be different from the entity.
    2. PACRA does not provide consultancy/advisory services or other services to any of its customers or their associated companies and associated undertakings that are being rated or have been rated by it during the preceding three years, unless it has an adequate mechanism in place ensuring that the provision of such services does not lead to a conflict of interest situation with its rating activities. (Chapter III; 12-2-(d))
    3. PACRA discloses that no shareholder directly or indirectly holding 10% or more of the share capital of PACRA also holds directly or indirectly 10% or more of the share capital of the entity which is subject to rating or the entity which issued the instrument subject to rating by PACRA. (Chapter III; 12-2-(f))
    4. PACRA ensures that the rating assigned to an entity or instrument is not affected by the existence of a business relationship between PACRA and the entity or any other party, or the non-existence of such a relationship. (Chapter III; 12-2-(i))
    5. PACRA ensures that the analysts or any of their family members shall not buy, sell, or engage in any transaction in any security which falls in the analyst’s area of primary analytical responsibility. This clause, however, does not apply to investments in securities through collective investment schemes. (Chapter III; 12-2-(l))
    6. PACRA has established policies and procedures governing investments and trading in securities by its employees and for monitoring the same to prevent insider trading, market manipulation, or any other market abuse. (Chapter III; 11-B-(g))
  5. Monitoring and Review
    1. PACRA monitors all the outstanding ratings continuously, and any potential change therein due to any event associated with the issuer, the security arrangement, the industry, etc., is disseminated to the market immediately and in an effective manner after appropriate consultation with the entity/issuer. (Chapter III; 17-(a))
    2. PACRA reviews all the outstanding ratings periodically on an annual basis. Provided that public dissemination of annual review and in an instance of change in rating will be made. (Chapter III; 17-(b))
    3. PACRA initiates an immediate review of the outstanding rating upon becoming aware of any information that may reasonably be expected to result in downgrading of the rating. (Chapter III; 17-(c))
    4. PACRA engages with the issuer and the debt securities trustee to remain updated on all information pertaining to the rating of the entity/instrument. (Chapter III; 17-(d))
  6. Probability of Default
    1. PACRA’s Rating Scale reflects the expectation of credit risk. The highest rating has the lowest relative likelihood of default (i.e., probability). PACRA’s transition studies capture the historical performance behavior of a specific rating notch. Transition behavior of the assigned rating can be obtained from PACRA’s Transition Study available at our website. (www.pacra.com) However, the actual transition of rating may not follow the pattern observed in the past. (Chapter III; 14-3(f)(vii))
  7. Proprietary Information
    1. All information contained herein is considered proprietary by PACRA. Hence, none of the information in this document can be copied or otherwise reproduced, stored, or disseminated in whole or in part in any form or by any means whatsoever by any person without PACRA’s prior written consent.

Apr-25

www.pacra.com