Rating History
Dissemination Date Long-Term Rating Short-Term Rating Outlook Action Rating Watch
04-Apr-25 A- A2 Stable Maintain YES
05-Apr-24 A- A2 Stable Maintain -
05-Apr-23 A- A2 Stable Maintain -
05-Apr-22 A- A2 Stable Maintain -
07-Apr-21 A- A2 Stable Maintain -
About the Entity

Mirpurkhas Sugar Mills Limited, incorporated in 1964, is a public listed company. The Company has a crushing capacity of 12,500 TCD with its mill located in Mirpurkhas, Sindh. Also, the company's paper and board business segment has the production capacity of 250 tons per day. Major shareholding lies with the Ghulam Faruque Group through Faruque Pvt. Limited and its associated companies (49.28%), Sponsors of the Company (0.87%), Banks, DFIs, NBFIs and others (9.37%), Insurance Companies (1.79%), Modarabas (8.09%) and General Public (30.6%).

Rating Rationale

The ratings reflect Mirpurkhas Sugar Mills Ltd.'s ('MSML' or 'the Company') strong standing in the market, which is attributed to its established position and its affiliation with the leading group - Ghulam Faruque Group. This association likely contributes to Mirpurkhas' stability and credibility within the industry. The ratings take into account MSML's varied revenue sources stemming from the sale of sugar, molasses, bagasse, and paper. Also, the Company entered into a joint venture with Mehran and Faran Sugar Mills Limited and established Unicol Limited - a leading ethanol producer. This helped the Company to mitigate the effects of the sugar industry's volatility and enhanced the Company's profitability. Mirpurkhas Sugar Mills' market risks stem from fluctuating sugarcane yields and volatile raw material prices, impacting operational certainty. This, in turn, impacts profit margins, leading to net losses. Due to the surplus stocks, the government has allowed the sugar millers to export ~0.79 million MT, ensuring liquidity relief for the industry. With the government's shift to deregulated pricing of sugarcane, the cost of goods sold is expected to decline moving forward, as prices are determined by market forces rather than fixed regulations. This transition to a market-driven pricing model will likely lead to more competitive pricing, encouraging efficiency and cost reduction across industries. In FY24, the Company achieved a ~54% increase in topline revenue, with ~67% of contributions from the sugar division and ~33% from the paper division. However, profitability remained under strain. Gross profit margins experienced a sharp contraction, declining by ~10.7% during MY24, primarily attributable to elevated sugarcane procurement costs. Consequently, operating profit margins also mirrored the same effect due to increased operating expenses. Additionally, the Company reported a net loss of ~19%, largely attributed to a substantial increase in finance costs. Furthermore, the Company's financial performance was adversely affected by a share of loss from Unicol Limited, amounting to PKR ~652mln, further contributing to the overall net loss. This rise in finance cost also led to a deterioration in debt coverage ratios, making it more challenging for the management. The Company remains compliant with all obligations, and management anticipates improved performance. MSML's efforts to streamline inventory are commendable, yet the substantial increase in receivable days suggests a need for closer scrutiny of their credit and collection practices. While overall working capital improved marginally, addressing the lengthening receivable cycle in paper sales could unlock further financial flexibility. The rating watch assigns reflect the losses of MSML and the share of loss from “JV” Unicol Limited. The Company performance will be analyzed in the upcoming quarters and, appropriate rating action will be taken in due course of time.

Key Rating Drivers

The ratings are dependent on the Company’s ability to improve profitability while strengthening coverage ratios. Prudent debt management and efficient working capital management, to eliminate any mismatch, is critical.

Profile
Legal Structure

Mirpurkhas Sugar Mill Limited (the Company) is a public listed Company and listed on Pakistan Stock Exchange.


Background

The Company was incorporated on May 27, 1964 and started its operations in 1965 with a crushing capacity of 1,500 TCD. Over the years, through frequent BMR and capacity enhancements, crushing capacity has been enhanced to 12,500 TCD. The Company's mill is located at Umerkot Road, Mirpurkhas, Sindh. Meanwhile the head office is based in Karachi. The Company also commenced corporate farming in 2012.


Operations

The Company’s operations are divided into two segments, i.e. Sugar Segment, Paper and Board Segment. The sugar plant of the Company operated for 97 days during MY24 (MY23: 87 days). Total sugarcane crushed was 616,102MT during MY24 (MY23: 562,641MT). Whereas total sugar produced was 66,101MT during MY24 (MY23: 59,325MT). Following this, the recovery rate during MY24 stood at 10.73% (MY23: 10.55%). For Paper and Board division, the Company has the production capacity of 250MT paper per day. It was also told that the plant produced 31,968 tons of paper in 2023-24, compared to last year, which was 17,959 tons. The Company has also 33.33% ownership stake in  Unicol Limited,  a joint venture between Faran Sugar Mills Limited and Mehran Sugar Mills Limited. Unicol’s ownership is divided equally among the three stake holders.


Ownership
Ownership Structure

Major shareholding lies with the Faruque Group through Faruque Pvt. Limited and its associated companies (49.28%), Sponsors of the Company (0.87%), Banks, DFIs, NBFIs and others (9.37%), Insurance Companies (1.79%), Modarabas (8.09%) and General Public (30.6%).


Stability

The Group's long-term vision is supported by a multi-generational management approach, with the third generation actively involved and the fourth generation being strategically introduced at various business and operational levels. This is further reinforced by a well-defined holding Company structure that fosters a shared understanding and clearly defined interests among the family sponsors, ensuring sustained and stable leadership.


Business Acumen

The Company is a part of Ghulam Faruque Group and is one of its first ventures. The Group was founded by Mr. Ghulam Faruque in 1964 through the establishment of Faruque (Private) Limited, the Parent Company. Over the years, the Group has established a strong foothold in various industries across Pakistan. After the demise of Mr. Faruque, operations of group companies were taken over by his five sons, who gradually expanded the business to where it stands today. The Group, through its established entities, and various subsidiaries, holds a notable position in the industries of cement, sugar, packaging, ethanol, software solution, power, air conditioning and FMCG, among others.


Financial Strength

The Company derives financial strength from Ghulam Faruque Group, which houses well-known entities, such as Cherat Cement Company Ltd., Cherat Packaging Ltd., Unicol Ltd., Unienergy Ltd. Faruque (Pvt.) Ltd., Greaves Pakistan (Pvt.) Ltd., Greaves Airconditioning (Pvt.) Ltd., Greaves Engineering Services (Pvt.) Ltd., Greaves CNG (PVT.) Ltd., and Zenosoft (Pvt.) Ltd. The Group's commitment to contingency planning ensures the Company has access to necessary financial support during times of financial challenge.


Governance
Board Structure

The Company’s Board of Directors comprises seven members, including the Chairman, three Non-Executive Directors including a female director, two Executive Directors and two Independent Directors, one of whom is a representative of NIT.


Members’ Profile

Members of the Company possess a diversified background. Mr. Arif Faruque is the chairman of board and also CEO of Faruque (Pvt.) Limited. He is on the Board of Directors of Cherat Packaging Ltd. and Cherat Cement Company Ltd. Besides the above, he is also a member of the Board of Governors of Lahore University of Management Sciences (LUMS).


Board Effectiveness

The Board maintains effective oversight through Board Audit Committee and HR & Remuneration Committee. High frequency of Board of Directors & Committees' meetings bodes well for the Company.


Financial Transparency

Kreston Hyder Bhimji & Co. Chartered Accountants, has expressed an unqualified opinion on the financial reports for the Company for the year ending in Sept-24. The firm is classified under category ‘A’ by the SBP and holds a satisfactory QCR rating.


Management
Organizational Structure

The Company functions through ten departments, encompassing finance, sales, marketing, procurement, and internal audit, among others. All department heads report to the COO, who concurrently serves as the CFO. However, the heads of Internal Audit and HR report administratively to the CEO and functionally to the Board Audit Committee and Board HR & Remuneration Committee, respectively


Management Team

Management comprises experienced individuals. The CEO, Mr. Aslam Faruque has experience of above 4 decades. He also serves as the CEO of Unicol Ltd., a joint venture distillery project. He is ably supported by COO & CFO - Mr. Wasif Khalid, having an experience of above 2 decades.


Effectiveness

The Board maintains effective oversight through Board Audit Committee and HR & Remuneration Committee. The frequent meetings of the Board of Directors and its Committees are indicative of a proactive approach, contributing positively to the Company's governance.


MIS

The Company implemented SAP in 2010 and upgraded to SAP HANA in 2024. Production, sales and financial reports are submitted to the senior management periodically.


Control Environment

In order to ensure operational efficiency, the Company has setup an effective internal audit function. The department conducts regular reviews to monitor effectiveness of operations while identifying potential areas of improvements.


Business Risk
Industry Dynamics

Pakistan’s sugar industry stands as the second-largest Agro-based sector in the country, comprising approximately 91 mills with an annual crushing capacity of 80-90 million MT. Despite its scale, the industry faces persistent challenges, particularly due to the Government-regulated sugarcane support prices, which are set based on farmers’ costs and often constrain millers' profitability. In MY24, sugar production was recorded at 6.76 million MT. Despite that sugarcane production declined by 6.25% in MY24, due to better weather conditions overall sugar production was slightly higher. Excess sugar production over consumption and opening carryover stock of sugar, to manage the surplus inventory, the Government permitted the export of 0.790 million MT of sugar, offering some relief to the industry industry to reduce the impact of these setbacks, sugar production is estimated to reduce by 10-15% due to non-availability of irrigation water across Pakistan , this will create a new equilibrium for sugar prices due to demand and supply position against the national consumption of sugar.


Relative Position

The Company held ~0.9% share in total sugar production of the country and holds a relatively low market share. Additionally, it is expanding its presence in the paper and board segment.


Revenues

The Company's MY24 financial performance presents a pronounced dichotomy between revenue expansion and profitability. Despite a 54% topline surge to PKR 12 billion, driven predominantly by sugar sales constituting 67% of revenue, a substantial PKR 2 billion net loss was realized including loss of PKR 652 million shared by Unicol Limited, a stark contrast to the prior year's PKR 839 million profit. This financial deterioration is primarily attributable to a depressed sugar and paper sale prices coupled with significant escalation in sugarcane costs, OCC materials both import and local, impacting the cost of goods sold, and a concurrent surge in finance costs to PKR 1.8 billion due to higher discounting rates, indicative of heightened debt servicing obligations. Furthermore,  paper division incurred a loss at the Profit Before Interest and Taxes (PBIT) level due to elevated cost of sales, a consequence of its developmental stage, effectively offsetting any potential profitability from the core sugar segment and exacerbating the overall financial deficit. Consequently, despite a marginal 0.9% market share in national sugar production and substantial revenue growth, the Company's inability to translate these gains into profitability underscores fundamental operational vulnerabilities. Strategic imperatives necessitate effective management of escalating input costs, rigorous financial restructuring to address burgeoning finance costs, and targeted initiatives to enhance market share. Concurrently, a focused approach to optimizing the paper division's cost structure and operational efficiency is crucial to mitigate its negative impact and contribute to overall financial stabilization and long-term sustainability.


Margins

The Company's MY24 financial performance demonstrates a significant and concerning erosion of profitability across all key margin metrics. Gross profit margins plummeted from 17.5% to 6.8%, directly reflecting the substantial impact of rising sugarcane costs on the Company's core operational efficiency. While operating profit margins appear to have decreased from 11.9% in MY23 to 2.0% in MY24, this apparent improvement is deceptive, as it is largely negated by the substantial increase in finance costs and operating expenses, which are factored in below the operating profit line. Critically, net profit margins deteriorated dramatically, shifting from a positive 10.8% in MY23 to a significant negative 18.6% in MY24. This drastic reversal underscores the Company's vulnerability to escalating input costs, burgeoning finance costs, and increased operating expenses, demanding immediate and comprehensive strategic interventions to restore profitability and ensure long-term financial stability.


Sustainability

High sugar price in the local market and robust demand of ethanol in the export market during tends to bode well for the Company, going forward. However, the Company is exposed to volatility and ensuing challenges in the sugar sector. On the other hand, the Company has successfully started commercial operations of its paper division from May 12, 2023 with the installed capacity of 250 tons' paper per day. To reduce its paper business cost of goods manufactured, the company has announced in December 24 to install a biomass pulping project with cost of Rs. 500 million, with a completion time of 16 months.


Financial Risk
Working capital

The Company’s working capital management is largely a function of its inventory. An inherent stress is faced by the Company due to seasonality in the crushing cycle. The Company's working capital dynamics in MY24 present a mixed picture. While certain operational efficiencies were achieved, others experienced deterioration. Specifically, inventory management demonstrated improvement, with average inventory days reducing from 89 to 70 days, indicating enhanced inventory turnover and potentially more efficient production or sales processes. Conversely, trade receivable days lengthened from 18 to 32 days, suggesting a potential increase in credit terms extended to customers or challenges in collections, which could impact cash flow. Consequently, gross working capital days decreased marginally from 108 to 102 days, reflecting the combined effect of improved inventory days and worsened receivable days. Trade payable days remained relatively stable, increasing slightly from 9 to 10 days. Ultimately, net working capital days showed a modest improvement, decreasing from 99 to 92 days. However, the significant deterioration in trade receivable days warrants careful attention, as it could signal underlying issues with credit management and potentially strain the Company's liquidity. While overall working capital efficiency improved slightly, the lengthening receivable cycle requires strategic review and potential corrective action to ensure sustainable cash flow management.


Coverages

The Company's financial risk profile deteriorated significantly in MY24, as evidenced by a substantial decline in key coverage ratios. Funds from Current Financial Operations (FCFO) decreased sharply to PKR 494 million from PKR 1,057 million in MY23, while finance costs surged to PKR 1.8 billion from PKR 1.1 billion. Consequently, the FCFO to finance cost coverage ratio plummeted to 0.3x from 0.9x, indicating a diminished capacity to service debt obligations. Furthermore, total coverage, reflecting the ability to cover all fixed charges, also deteriorated markedly to 0.1x from 0.3x. This drastic reduction in coverage ratios signals a heightened financial risk, reflecting the Company's reduced ability to meet its financial commitments due to declining operating cash flows and escalating finance costs, necessitating urgent financial restructuring to mitigate potential liquidity and solvency issues.


Capitalization

The Company's capital structure exhibits a heightened level of financial leverage, as evidenced by a substantial increase in the debt-to-equity ratio from 66% in MY23 to 78% in MY24. This notable escalation is primarily attributed to a significant expansion in the Company's borrowing activities, with total borrowings rising from PKR 7,754 million to PKR 8,923 million. This increased reliance on debt financing signifies a heightened financial risk profile, potentially exposing the Company to increased interest rate sensitivity and a greater vulnerability to financial distress in the event of adverse market conditions or operational challenges. The elevated leverage necessitates a strategic review of the Company's capital structure and a careful assessment of its ability to service the increased debt load, emphasizing the need for robust cash flow management and potential debt restructuring initiatives.


 
 

Apr-25

www.pacra.com


Dec-24
3M
Sep-24
12M
Sep-23
12M
Sep-22
12M
A. BALANCE SHEET
1. Non-Current Assets 6,892 6,849 6,852 5,839
2. Investments 804 468 31 2
3. Related Party Exposure 1,453 1,437 2,385 1,723
4. Current Assets 5,951 5,029 4,556 2,661
a. Inventories 2,742 2,181 2,408 1,405
b. Trade Receivables 1,750 1,422 668 113
5. Total Assets 15,100 13,783 13,824 10,224
6. Current Liabilities 1,947 1,716 1,359 1,478
a. Trade Payables 447 353 286 89
7. Borrowings 9,718 8,923 7,754 5,160
8. Related Party Exposure 0 0 0 0
9. Non-Current Liabilities 651 647 619 475
10. Net Assets 2,784 2,497 4,092 3,111
11. Shareholders' Equity 2,784 2,497 4,092 3,111
B. INCOME STATEMENT
1. Sales 3,193 11,970 7,779 4,833
a. Cost of Good Sold (2,747) (11,150) (6,416) (4,355)
2. Gross Profit 446 820 1,363 478
a. Operating Expenses (197) (584) (435) (247)
3. Operating Profit 249 236 928 231
a. Non Operating Income or (Expense) 25 (639) 1,250 498
4. Profit or (Loss) before Interest and Tax 274 (403) 2,178 729
a. Total Finance Cost (290) (1,858) (1,124) (429)
b. Taxation (44) 40 (215) (96)
6. Net Income Or (Loss) (60) (2,221) 839 204
C. CASH FLOW STATEMENT
a. Free Cash Flows from Operations (FCFO) 298 494 1,057 408
b. Net Cash from Operating Activities before Working Capital Changes (108) (1,364) 445 453
c. Changes in Working Capital (541) (84) (1,803) (550)
1. Net Cash provided by Operating Activities (649) (1,447) (1,357) (98)
2. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Investing Activities (120) (188) (1,216) (1,612)
3. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Financing Activities 777 1,655 2,589 1,694
4. Net Cash generated or (Used) during the period 8 20 15 (16)
D. RATIO ANALYSIS
1. Performance
a. Sales Growth (for the period) 6.7% 53.9% 61.0% 25.2%
b. Gross Profit Margin 14.0% 6.8% 17.5% 9.9%
c. Net Profit Margin -1.9% -18.6% 10.8% 4.2%
d. Cash Conversion Efficiency (FCFO adjusted for Working Capital/Sales) -7.6% 3.4% -9.6% -3.0%
e. Return on Equity [ Net Profit Margin * Asset Turnover * (Total Assets/Shareholders' Equity )] -9.0% -67.4% 23.3% 6.4%
2. Working Capital Management
a. Gross Working Capital (Average Days) 116 102 108 97
b. Net Working Capital (Average Days) 104 92 99 90
c. Current Ratio (Current Assets / Current Liabilities) 3.1 2.9 3.4 1.8
3. Coverages
a. EBITDA / Finance Cost 1.2 0.4 1.1 1.0
b. FCFO / Finance Cost+CMLTB+Excess STB 0.3 0.1 0.3 0.2
c. Debt Payback (Total Borrowings+Excess STB) / (FCFO-Finance Cost) 113.8 -3.8 -71.0 -206.7
4. Capital Structure
a. Total Borrowings / (Total Borrowings+Shareholders' Equity) 77.7% 78.1% 65.5% 62.4%
b. Interest or Markup Payable (Days) 62.6 66.3 124.3 142.0
c. Entity Average Borrowing Rate 11.6% 19.4% 14.6% 8.2%

Apr-25

www.pacra.com

Apr-25

www.pacra.com

  1. Rating Team Statements
    1. Rating is just an opinion about the creditworthiness of the entity and does not constitute a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell any security of the entity rated or to buy, hold, or sell the security rated, as the case may be. (Chapter III; 14-3-(x))
    2. Conflict of Interest
      1. The Rating Team or any of their family members have no interest in this rating (Chapter III; 12-2-(j))
      2. PACRA, the analysts involved in the rating process, and members of its rating committee and their family members do not have any conflict of interest relating to the rating done by them (Chapter III; 12-2-(e) & (k))
      3. The analyst is not a substantial shareholder of the customer being rated by PACRA [Annexure F; d-(ii)]
      4. Explanation: for the purpose of the above clause, the term "family members" shall include only those family members who are dependent on the analyst and members of the rating committee.
  2. Restrictions
    1. No director, officer, or employee of PACRA communicates the information acquired by him for use for rating purposes to any other person, except where required under law to do so. (Chapter III; 10-(5))
    2. PACRA does not disclose or discuss with outside parties or make improper use of the non-public information which has come to its knowledge during a business relationship with the customer. (Chapter III; 10-7-(d))
    3. PACRA does not make proposals or recommendations regarding the activities of rated entities that could impact a credit rating of the entity subject to rating. (Chapter III; 10-7-(k))
  3. Conduct of Business
    1. PACRA fulfills its obligations in a fair, efficient, transparent, and ethical manner and renders high standards of services in performing its functions and obligations. (Chapter III; 11-A-(a))
    2. PACRA uses due care in the preparation of this Rating Report. Our information has been obtained from sources we consider to be reliable, but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. PACRA does not, in every instance, independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing this Rating Report. (Clause 11-(A)(p))
    3. PACRA prohibits its employees and analysts from soliciting money, gifts, or favors from anyone with whom PACRA conducts business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(q))
    4. PACRA ensures before the commencement of the rating process that an analyst or employee has not had a recent employment or other significant business or personal relationship with the rated entity that may cause or may be perceived as causing a conflict of interest. (Chapter III; 11-A-(r))
    5. PACRA maintains the principle of integrity in seeking rating business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(u))
    6. PACRA promptly investigates in the event of misconduct or a breach of the policies, procedures, and controls, and takes appropriate steps to rectify any weaknesses to prevent any recurrence, along with suitable punitive action against the responsible employee(s). (Chapter III; 11-B-(m))
  4. Independence & Conflict of Interest
    1. PACRA receives compensation from the entity being rated or any third party for the rating services it offers. The receipt of this compensation has no influence on PACRA’s opinions or other analytical processes. In all instances, PACRA is committed to preserving the objectivity, integrity, and independence of its ratings. Our relationship is governed by two distinct mandates: i) rating mandate - signed with the entity being rated or issuer of the debt instrument, and ii) fee mandate - signed with the payer, which can be different from the entity.
    2. PACRA does not provide consultancy/advisory services or other services to any of its customers or their associated companies and associated undertakings that are being rated or have been rated by it during the preceding three years, unless it has an adequate mechanism in place ensuring that the provision of such services does not lead to a conflict of interest situation with its rating activities. (Chapter III; 12-2-(d))
    3. PACRA discloses that no shareholder directly or indirectly holding 10% or more of the share capital of PACRA also holds directly or indirectly 10% or more of the share capital of the entity which is subject to rating or the entity which issued the instrument subject to rating by PACRA. (Chapter III; 12-2-(f))
    4. PACRA ensures that the rating assigned to an entity or instrument is not affected by the existence of a business relationship between PACRA and the entity or any other party, or the non-existence of such a relationship. (Chapter III; 12-2-(i))
    5. PACRA ensures that the analysts or any of their family members shall not buy, sell, or engage in any transaction in any security which falls in the analyst’s area of primary analytical responsibility. This clause, however, does not apply to investments in securities through collective investment schemes. (Chapter III; 12-2-(l))
    6. PACRA has established policies and procedures governing investments and trading in securities by its employees and for monitoring the same to prevent insider trading, market manipulation, or any other market abuse. (Chapter III; 11-B-(g))
  5. Monitoring and Review
    1. PACRA monitors all the outstanding ratings continuously, and any potential change therein due to any event associated with the issuer, the security arrangement, the industry, etc., is disseminated to the market immediately and in an effective manner after appropriate consultation with the entity/issuer. (Chapter III; 17-(a))
    2. PACRA reviews all the outstanding ratings periodically on an annual basis. Provided that public dissemination of annual review and in an instance of change in rating will be made. (Chapter III; 17-(b))
    3. PACRA initiates an immediate review of the outstanding rating upon becoming aware of any information that may reasonably be expected to result in downgrading of the rating. (Chapter III; 17-(c))
    4. PACRA engages with the issuer and the debt securities trustee to remain updated on all information pertaining to the rating of the entity/instrument. (Chapter III; 17-(d))
  6. Probability of Default
    1. PACRA’s Rating Scale reflects the expectation of credit risk. The highest rating has the lowest relative likelihood of default (i.e., probability). PACRA’s transition studies capture the historical performance behavior of a specific rating notch. Transition behavior of the assigned rating can be obtained from PACRA’s Transition Study available at our website. (www.pacra.com) However, the actual transition of rating may not follow the pattern observed in the past. (Chapter III; 14-3(f)(vii))
  7. Proprietary Information
    1. All information contained herein is considered proprietary by PACRA. Hence, none of the information in this document can be copied or otherwise reproduced, stored, or disseminated in whole or in part in any form or by any means whatsoever by any person without PACRA’s prior written consent.

Apr-25

www.pacra.com