Rating History
Dissemination Date Long-Term Rating Short-Term Rating Outlook Action Rating Watch
27-Jan-25 A- A2 Stable Maintain -
27-Jan-24 A- A2 Stable Maintain -
27-Jan-23 A- A2 Stable Maintain -
27-Jan-22 A- A2 Stable Initial -
About the Entity

KAM International, incorporated on August 7, 1996, operates as a sole proprietorship. It has an integrated network comprising weaving, printing, dyeing, finishing, cutting and stitching units. The owner, Mr. Shoaib Majeed brings with him over twenty-five years of experience. The CEO, Mr. Rayyan Ahmed is accompanied by a team of seasoned professionals.

Rating Rationale

The ratings of KAM International emanate from the sponsor's business profile encompassing all aspects of the textile value chain. KAM International is a business venture of Mekotex Group, with three other entities operating under its umbrella: Mekotex (Pvt). Limited, Meko Denim Mills (Pvt). Limited and Meko Textile (Pvt). Limited. This structure enables them to manage volatility in the respective industry. KAM International exports home textile products to Europe and the USA, including bed sheets, quilts, pillow covers, cushions, and bedding sets. These products are designed to meet international customer’s specific requirements and quality standards. This production mechanism is supplemented by an annual production capacity of ~39.6mln meters of fabric, ~12.0mln meters of printed fabric, and ~14.0mln pieces of garments. On the strategic side, the management intends to venture into the towel segment in the coming years driven by a higher potential for margins and opportunity to diversify its income stream. During FY24, the topline reflected a robust increase at PKR 12.2bln (FY23: PKR 8.7bln); dominated by the export sales with a major contribution of ~95.5%. Bed sheet is the foremost product in terms of product pricing and quantity. The escalated raw material prices and the surge in finishing charges squeezed the GP margin. However, the self-sufficiency in meeting energy requirements was accompanied by an 8-megawatt power generation boiler. The elevated operating expenses coupled with magnified finance cost has diluted the profitability matrix (FY24: PKR 580mln; FY23: PKR 1.6bln). The financial risk profile of KAM International is considered adequate with a leveraged capital structure and a gradual improvement in working capital management. Over the years, the consistent withdrawal of funds from the retained earnings to support the expansion at the group level has caused the depletion in the equity levels. The establishment of a corporatization structure will augment the ownership profile and governance framework. The country's textile exports reached USD 16.7bln in FY24, a slight increase from USD 16.5bln in the previous year, reflecting a growth of 0.93% YoY. The highest contribution came from the composite and garments segment at USD 9.1bln, followed by the weaving segment at USD 6.5bln and the spinning segment at USD 1.0bln. During 5MFY25, the textile exports stood at USD 7.6bln. In FY25, the transition from the final tax regime to the normal tax regime is set to impact the profitability matrix of export-oriented units, with a 29% tax on profits and a super tax of up to 10%. The consistent decline in policy rates over the last two quarters, along with the anticipation of further reductions, is expected to provide a cushion in the financial metrics of the industry.

Key Rating Drivers

The ratings are dependent upon the sustainable growth in business volumes while maintaining the profitability matrix at an optimal level. The improvement in coverages and generation of sufficient cashflows from core operations remain critical. Adherence to the debt matrix at an optimal level is a prerequisite for assigned ratings.

Profile
Legal Structure

KAM International was founded as a sole proprietorship on August 7, 1996.


Background

It is a strategic venture of the sponsor of Mekotex Group, established on January 21, 2021, marking a significant milestone with the launch of its home textile business. This expansion underscores the Group's dedication to broadening its influence and fostering growth within the local textile industry. Founded in 1979 by the late Mr. Abdul Majid Qasim, the Mekotex Group has built a renowned legacy of excellence in the textile sector. Throughout its evolution, the Group has flourished under the visionary leadership of Mr. Abdul Majid and his sons—Mr. Khalid Majeed, Mr. Shoaib Majeed, and the late Mr. Ashraf Majeed—whose combined efforts have been instrumental in guiding the Group toward continued success and sustainable growth.


Operations

Its operational infrastructure includes weaving, printing, and stitching with 268 air-jet looms and 400 stitching machines. The stitching unit has an annual production capacity of approximately 13 million garments. The registered office of Kam International is located at Hub River Road, Sindh Industrial Trading Estate, Karachi, serving as a central hub for its operations. Specializing in the manufacturing and export of high-quality home textile articles, it offers an extensive range of products, including bed sheets, pillow covers, and complete bedding sets, catering to both retailers and end consumers. To ensure seamless and efficient production, the Mekotex Group operates with an 8-megawatt power generation boiler, which caters to the energy needs of KAM International and maintains uninterrupted operations.




Ownership
Ownership Structure

KAM International is a sole proprietorship owned exclusively by Mr. Shoaib Majeed, who is responsible for managing its operations and guiding its strategic direction.


Stability

As a sole proprietorship, KAM International lacks a shareholding agreement or a formal succession plan which poses potential challenges to its long-term stability, however, the sponsor's extensive track record of over two decades instills confidence, providing a foundation for continued success and growth.


Business Acumen

The sponsoring family has a longstanding presence in Pakistan through Mekotex Group, with a proven track record of growth and resilience in the local industry, demonstrated by its transition from a single Company, Mekotex (Pvt). Limited to an established group. Throughout various macroeconomic cycles, the sponsors have navigated volatility while maintaining steady growth. Over the years, the Group has built significant expertise in the textile and garment sector, fostering enduring relationships with numerous international customers which is expected to drive the Group’s success and expansion.


Financial Strength

KAM International derives its financial strength from the sponsor's presence across all segments of the textile value chain. In addition to KAM International, the sponsors operate with three other companies in the respective industry: Mekotex (Private) Limited, Meko Denim Mills (Private) Limited, and Meko Textile (Private) Limited.



Governance
Board Structure

KAM International currently has no formal board due to its legal structure. However, establishing a formal board would enhance the governance framework, promoting stronger oversight and strategic decision-making.


Members’ Profile

Mr. Shoaib Majeed, the owner of KAM International, holds a degree in Business Administration and plays a key role in managing various aspects of the family business. His hands-on leadership approach has been instrumental in driving the notable growth. With extensive expertise in the textile industry, he holds a directorship position at the flagship Company of the Mekotex Group.



Board Effectiveness

Due to the absence of a formal board, the CEO exercises centralized control over all operational decisions, directly overseeing and managing activities.


Financial Transparency

To align with the standards of transparency, M. Saleem Associates Chartered Accountants have been appointed as the external auditors. They expressed an unqualified opinion on the financial statements of KAM International for the year ended June 30th, 2023. The audit for the fiscal year 2024 is underway and it is expected to culminate by the end of February 2025.


Management
Organizational Structure

KAM International has established a lean organizational structure to ensure efficient execution of operations. The overall functions are divided into several key departments, including: (i) Finance & Commercial (F&C), (ii) Marketing, (iii) Technical, (iv) Production, (v) Information Technology, and (vi) HR, Administration, and Procurement. All departments report directly to the CEO.


Management Team

Mr. Rayyan Ahmed Ashraf, the Chief Executive Officer, brings with him seven years of professional experience in the textile industry. He holds a Bachelor of Arts (Honors) degree, which has provided him with a strong academic foundation and valuable skills that have contributed to his success in the leadership role.


Effectiveness

Management meetings are held regularly to review progress, address operational challenges, and proactively resolve any issues that may arise. These meetings serve as a platform for discussing key departmental concerns and ensuring a smooth flow of operations across functions.



MIS

For comprehensive business reporting, management has implemented an Oracle-based ERP system. This fully integrated IT system connects all major departments, from production to dispatch, enabling efficient management of financials, supply chain, and manufacturing processes.


Control Environment

KAM International utilizes management systems as their mechanism for ensuring control. There is clear evidence that these systems are being audited and certified externally. Examples include ISO 14001:2004 Environmental Management System, STeP-OEKO TEX, GOTS – Global Organic Textile Standards, Made in Green – OEKO TEX & Better Cotton Index certifications. KAM International has no formal in-house internal audit department. 


Business Risk
Industry Dynamics

The country's textile exports reached USD 16.7bln in FY24, a slight increase from USD 16.5bln in the previous year, reflecting a growth of 0.93% YoY. The highest contribution came from the composite and garments segment at USD 9.1bln, followed by the weaving segment at USD 6.5bln and the spinning segment at USD 1.0bln. During 5MFY25, the textile exports stood at USD 7.6bln. In FY25, the transition from the final tax regime to the normal tax regime is set to impact the profitability matrix of export-oriented units, with a 29% tax on profits and a super tax of up to 10%. The consistent decline in policy rates over the last two quarters, along with the anticipation of further reductions, is expected to provide a cushion in the financial metrics of the industry.


Relative Position

KAM International has an adequate positioning on a standalone basis and is considered a middle-tier player in the respective industry.


Revenues

The revenue base is predominantly vested in the sale of home textile articles. During FY24, the top line experienced an upswing, reaching PKR 12.2bln (FY23: PKR 8.7bln), primarily due to a sizeable increase in export sales driven by a healthy increase in the sales volumes, which account for approximately 95.5% of the revenue, whereas local sales make up around 4.5%. KAM International enjoys a stable customer base in the international market accompanied by direct and indirect exports. The client concentration risk is considered moderate attributed to the long-term association of the stable entities with the sponsoring group.


Margins

During FY24, the gross profit margin declined to 16.1% (FY23: 26.8%) attributed to the expensive procurement of fabric. The raw material-to-sales ratio increased to 55.5% (FY23: 49.1%), while its energy cost-to-sales ratio remained notably lower than industry peers, thereby supporting a more efficient and balanced performance in its core operations. PBIT exhibited a dilution at PKR 1.1bln (FY23: PKR 2.0bln) driven by a sizeable increase in operating expenses at PKR 820mln (FY23: PKR 287mln), concomitant with the inflationary trends. The extensive working capital requirements magnified the borrowing cost at PKR 445mln (FY23: PKR 302mln). Consequently, the bottom line witnesses a dip clocking at PKR 580mln (FY23: PKR 1.6bln), with a net profit margin of 4.7% (FY23: 18.9%).


Sustainability

Management intends to enhance its international presence by leveraging parental strength and onboarding new customers. However, the impact and trend of withdrawals from KAM International's retained earnings on its equity levels need to be observed in the upcoming quarters. Management plans to utilize these funds to support and establish other group business ventures.


Financial Risk
Working capital

The working capital cycle of KAM International is a function of inventory days and trade receivables days for which it relies on internally generated cash flows and short-term borrowings. During FY24, the cash conversion cycle reflected an improvement at 88 days (FY23: 164 days) attributed to an optimization of the inventory cycle (FY24: 84 days; FY23: 153 days) and the trade receivables cycle (FY24: 45 days; FY23: 73 days), demonstrating the earlier recovery of payments from the customers. KAM International has no room to borrow as the short-term trade leverage was recorded negatively at 23.0% (FY23: 43.5%).


Coverages

The dilution in PBT ultimately impacted the Free Cash Flows from Operations (FCFO) reported at PKR 622mln (FY23: PKR 1.7bln) reflecting moderate internal cash flows. The expensive borrowings coupled with a dip in FCFO led to a sharp decrease in the interest coverage (FY24: 1.4x, FY23: 7.5x). Looking ahead, the improvement in the coverages remains essential.


Capitalization

The debt profile of KAM International comprises short-term borrowings (STBs), which include an Export Refinance Scheme (ERF) provided by the State Bank of Pakistan (SBP) as well as conventional debt. It has maintained a leveraged capital structure mainly dominated by the STBs to meet the extensive working capital requirements. During FY24, the total leveraging rose slightly to 48.3%, compared to 35.3% as of FY23. However, the total equity exhibited a dip at PKR 2.1bln, as the sponsors withdrew PKR 2.0bln to finance the expansion project in the group Company.


 
 

Jan-25

www.pacra.com


Jun-24
12M
Jun-23
12M
Jun-22
12M
A. BALANCE SHEET
1. Non-Current Assets 903 846 806
2. Investments 0 0 0
3. Related Party Exposure 0 0 0
4. Current Assets 4,625 6,183 6,663
a. Inventories 2,310 3,356 4,021
b. Trade Receivables 1,353 1,713 1,794
5. Total Assets 5,528 7,028 7,469
6. Current Liabilities 1,467 1,582 1,568
a. Trade Payables 1,326 1,486 1,485
7. Borrowings 1,960 1,920 2,971
8. Related Party Exposure 0 0 0
9. Non-Current Liabilities 0 0 0
10. Net Assets 2,100 3,526 2,931
11. Shareholders' Equity 2,100 3,526 2,931
B. INCOME STATEMENT
1. Sales 12,296 8,785 10,687
a. Cost of Good Sold (10,320) (6,430) (8,430)
2. Gross Profit 1,976 2,355 2,257
a. Operating Expenses (820) (287) (339)
3. Operating Profit 1,156 2,068 1,918
a. Non Operating Income or (Expense) 0 0 0
4. Profit or (Loss) before Interest and Tax 1,156 2,068 1,918
a. Total Finance Cost (445) (302) (206)
b. Taxation (131) (103) (102)
6. Net Income Or (Loss) 580 1,663 1,610
C. CASH FLOW STATEMENT
a. Free Cash Flows from Operations (FCFO) 622 1,707 1,647
b. Net Cash from Operating Activities before Working Capital Changes (1,452) 1,707 1,647
c. Changes in Working Capital 1,652 (485) 1,068
1. Net Cash provided by Operating Activities 199 1,222 2,715
2. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Investing Activities (30) (83) (45)
3. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Financing Activities 0 (1,068) (2,670)
4. Net Cash generated or (Used) during the period 169 71 (0)
D. RATIO ANALYSIS
1. Performance
a. Sales Growth (for the period) 40.0% -17.8% 3.1%
b. Gross Profit Margin 16.1% 26.8% 21.1%
c. Net Profit Margin 4.7% 18.9% 15.1%
d. Cash Conversion Efficiency (FCFO adjusted for Working Capital/Sales) 18.5% 13.9% 25.4%
e. Return on Equity [ Net Profit Margin * Asset Turnover * (Total Assets/Shareholders' Equity )] 20.6% 51.5% 46.5%
2. Working Capital Management
a. Gross Working Capital (Average Days) 130 226 189
b. Net Working Capital (Average Days) 88 164 148
c. Current Ratio (Current Assets / Current Liabilities) 3.2 3.9 4.3
3. Coverages
a. EBITDA / Finance Cost 1.7 8.0 15.8
b. FCFO / Finance Cost+CMLTB+Excess STB 1.4 7.5 14.8
c. Debt Payback (Total Borrowings+Excess STB) / (FCFO-Finance Cost) 0.0 0.0 0.0
4. Capital Structure
a. Total Borrowings / (Total Borrowings+Shareholders' Equity) 48.3% 35.3% 50.3%
b. Interest or Markup Payable (Days) 0.0 0.0 0.0
c. Entity Average Borrowing Rate 23.3% 9.8% 4.5%

Jan-25

www.pacra.com

Jan-25

www.pacra.com

  1. Rating Team Statements
    1. Rating is just an opinion about the creditworthiness of the entity and does not constitute a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell any security of the entity rated or to buy, hold, or sell the security rated, as the case may be. (Chapter III; 14-3-(x))
    2. Conflict of Interest
      1. The Rating Team or any of their family members have no interest in this rating (Chapter III; 12-2-(j))
      2. PACRA, the analysts involved in the rating process, and members of its rating committee and their family members do not have any conflict of interest relating to the rating done by them (Chapter III; 12-2-(e) & (k))
      3. The analyst is not a substantial shareholder of the customer being rated by PACRA [Annexure F; d-(ii)]
      4. Explanation: for the purpose of the above clause, the term "family members" shall include only those family members who are dependent on the analyst and members of the rating committee.
  2. Restrictions
    1. No director, officer, or employee of PACRA communicates the information acquired by him for use for rating purposes to any other person, except where required under law to do so. (Chapter III; 10-(5))
    2. PACRA does not disclose or discuss with outside parties or make improper use of the non-public information which has come to its knowledge during a business relationship with the customer. (Chapter III; 10-7-(d))
    3. PACRA does not make proposals or recommendations regarding the activities of rated entities that could impact a credit rating of the entity subject to rating. (Chapter III; 10-7-(k))
  3. Conduct of Business
    1. PACRA fulfills its obligations in a fair, efficient, transparent, and ethical manner and renders high standards of services in performing its functions and obligations. (Chapter III; 11-A-(a))
    2. PACRA uses due care in the preparation of this Rating Report. Our information has been obtained from sources we consider to be reliable, but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. PACRA does not, in every instance, independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing this Rating Report. (Clause 11-(A)(p))
    3. PACRA prohibits its employees and analysts from soliciting money, gifts, or favors from anyone with whom PACRA conducts business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(q))
    4. PACRA ensures before the commencement of the rating process that an analyst or employee has not had a recent employment or other significant business or personal relationship with the rated entity that may cause or may be perceived as causing a conflict of interest. (Chapter III; 11-A-(r))
    5. PACRA maintains the principle of integrity in seeking rating business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(u))
    6. PACRA promptly investigates in the event of misconduct or a breach of the policies, procedures, and controls, and takes appropriate steps to rectify any weaknesses to prevent any recurrence, along with suitable punitive action against the responsible employee(s). (Chapter III; 11-B-(m))
  4. Independence & Conflict of Interest
    1. PACRA receives compensation from the entity being rated or any third party for the rating services it offers. The receipt of this compensation has no influence on PACRA’s opinions or other analytical processes. In all instances, PACRA is committed to preserving the objectivity, integrity, and independence of its ratings. Our relationship is governed by two distinct mandates: i) rating mandate - signed with the entity being rated or issuer of the debt instrument, and ii) fee mandate - signed with the payer, which can be different from the entity.
    2. PACRA does not provide consultancy/advisory services or other services to any of its customers or their associated companies and associated undertakings that are being rated or have been rated by it during the preceding three years, unless it has an adequate mechanism in place ensuring that the provision of such services does not lead to a conflict of interest situation with its rating activities. (Chapter III; 12-2-(d))
    3. PACRA discloses that no shareholder directly or indirectly holding 10% or more of the share capital of PACRA also holds directly or indirectly 10% or more of the share capital of the entity which is subject to rating or the entity which issued the instrument subject to rating by PACRA. (Chapter III; 12-2-(f))
    4. PACRA ensures that the rating assigned to an entity or instrument is not affected by the existence of a business relationship between PACRA and the entity or any other party, or the non-existence of such a relationship. (Chapter III; 12-2-(i))
    5. PACRA ensures that the analysts or any of their family members shall not buy, sell, or engage in any transaction in any security which falls in the analyst’s area of primary analytical responsibility. This clause, however, does not apply to investments in securities through collective investment schemes. (Chapter III; 12-2-(l))
    6. PACRA has established policies and procedures governing investments and trading in securities by its employees and for monitoring the same to prevent insider trading, market manipulation, or any other market abuse. (Chapter III; 11-B-(g))
  5. Monitoring and Review
    1. PACRA monitors all the outstanding ratings continuously, and any potential change therein due to any event associated with the issuer, the security arrangement, the industry, etc., is disseminated to the market immediately and in an effective manner after appropriate consultation with the entity/issuer. (Chapter III; 17-(a))
    2. PACRA reviews all the outstanding ratings periodically on an annual basis. Provided that public dissemination of annual review and in an instance of change in rating will be made. (Chapter III; 17-(b))
    3. PACRA initiates an immediate review of the outstanding rating upon becoming aware of any information that may reasonably be expected to result in downgrading of the rating. (Chapter III; 17-(c))
    4. PACRA engages with the issuer and the debt securities trustee to remain updated on all information pertaining to the rating of the entity/instrument. (Chapter III; 17-(d))
  6. Probability of Default
    1. PACRA’s Rating Scale reflects the expectation of credit risk. The highest rating has the lowest relative likelihood of default (i.e., probability). PACRA’s transition studies capture the historical performance behavior of a specific rating notch. Transition behavior of the assigned rating can be obtained from PACRA’s Transition Study available at our website. (www.pacra.com) However, the actual transition of rating may not follow the pattern observed in the past. (Chapter III; 14-3(f)(vii))
  7. Proprietary Information
    1. All information contained herein is considered proprietary by PACRA. Hence, none of the information in this document can be copied or otherwise reproduced, stored, or disseminated in whole or in part in any form or by any means whatsoever by any person without PACRA’s prior written consent.

Jan-25

www.pacra.com