Rating History
Dissemination Date Long-Term Rating Short-Term Rating Outlook Action Rating Watch
27-Dec-24 A- A2 Stable Maintain -
29-Dec-23 A- A2 Stable Maintain -
30-Dec-22 A- A2 Stable Maintain -
04-Aug-22 A- A2 Stable Upgrade -
04-Aug-21 BBB+ A2 Stable Maintain -
About the Entity

Interwood Mobel (Private) Limited, founded by Mr. Farooq Ahmed Malik in 1974, has over four decades of experience in manufacturing and selling furniture and allied items. The Company operates through five retail outlets in Karachi (1), Lahore (2), and Islamabad (2), with additional dealer networks in other cities. Major shareholding (~99.9%) lies with the Farooq Family: Mr. Farooq Ahmed Malik and Mrs. Ghazala Farooq own ~17% and ~16%, respectively, while their sons, Mr. Omar Farooq and Mr. Ali Farooq, each own ~33%. The remaining ~0.1% is held by close relatives. The Company is led by the CEO Mr. Omar Farooq, supported by a professional management team.

Rating Rationale

Interwood Mobel (Private) Limited (‘Interwood Mobel’ or ‘the Company’) is engaged in the manufacturing & sale of a wide range of home, offices, kitchens, doors, wardrobes, flooring, accessories and bespoke furniture. The ratings reflect the Company’s strong brand equity and long-established presence in Pakistan’s furniture and fixture industry. High competition subsists in the domestic market driven by unstructured and unregulated players, while organized segments primarily target high-end customers. Interwood Mobel procures safe and good quality imported wood to secure reliability and durability of its furniture. From wood seasoning and processing, to robotic painting, polishing, crafting and finishing, the Company’s factory is a marvel of innovation & technology to achieve mass production capability, operational efficiency and reduce overheads. The Company has been successful in evolving its business portfolio and enjoys a healthy mix between retail and corporate sales. The assigned ratings reflect the Company’s state-of-the-art facilities, national footprint, brand value, and large-scale projects. Interwood Mobel’s performance is closely tied to the real estate sector, given its significant corporate clientele. In FY24, local furniture market demand declined, primarily due to a downturn in the real estate sector. This was driven by challenging conditions in the construction, steel, and cement industries, alongside uncertain foreign exchange reserves, higher policy interest rates to curb inflation, and reduced purchasing power. As a result, the Company’s topline witnessed modest growth of ~2.4% in FY24, primarily due to price inflation. Consequently, margins improved; however, profit before tax (PBT) declined due to increased finance costs. The improvement in net profit margins was mainly due to favorable tax adjustments, which offset some of the negative impacts of the increased finance costs. However, the Company’s diverse segment mix and extensive product line position it well for a competitive edge. Looking ahead, management is diligently working to enhance revenues and margins by securing new contracts. The Company’s financial risk profile is considered adequate, marked by modest coverages, an adequate working capital cycle, and satisfactory cash flows. The capital structure is moderately leveraged, mainly comprising short-term borrowings (STBs). With a highly experienced management team and strong internal controls, the Company has implemented effective risk mitigation measures. However, implementation of good governance structure is required to ensure compliance at all levels and smooth running of operations.

Key Rating Drivers

The ratings are dependent on the Company’s ability to sustain its industry-leading position while consistently growing in a dynamic business environment. Sustained revenue growth, robust profit margins, and prudent financial performance as depicted in Company’s financial projections shall remain imperative. Meanwhile, enhancing the financial profile through effective working capital management and strong coverage ratios will be crucial.

Profile
Legal Structure

Interwood Mobel (Private) Limited, hereinafter referred to as ‘Interwood Mobel’ or ‘the Company’, is a private limited company incorporated under the Companies Ordinance, 1984 (now the Companies Act, 2017). The Company’s registered office is located at Building No.43-C Bukhari Commercial Lane No.11, Phase-VI, DHA, Karachi.

Background

Interwood Mobel (Private) Limited was founded by Mr. Farooq Ahmed Malik and began operations in 1974 with a modest workshop in Lahore. Over the years, the Company has significantly expanded its operations by investing in state-of-the-art machinery and automating production lines, ensuring high-quality manufacturing processes and efficiency. Initially, the Company’s primary focus was on accepting and executing contractual jobs, which helped establish its reputation for reliability and excellence in the industry. However, since 2002, Interwood Mobel has successfully diversified its business profile by entering the retail market. This strategic shift has allowed the Company to reach a broader customer base, strengthen its brand presence, and drive sustained growth. Today, Interwood Mobel stands as a leader in the furniture and interior solutions industry, known for its innovative designs, quality craftsmanship, and customer-centric approach.

Operations

The Company is actively involved in the manufacture and sale of high-quality furniture and allied items. The head office and production facility are strategically consolidated at a single location on Sultan Mehmood Road, Lahore, ensuring streamlined operations and efficient management. Interwood Mobel operates one company-owned retail outlet in Karachi and four rented outlets strategically located in key cities, including two in Lahore and two in Islamabad. These outlets serve as prime touchpoints for direct consumer engagement and brand visibility. In addition to its own retail outlets, Interwood Mobel has successfully established a robust presence in other major cities such as Multan, Hyderabad, and Quetta through an extensive dealer network. This network enables the Company to reach a broader customer base and cater to diverse market needs both locally and globally. Through continuous investment in state-of-the-art technology and production processes, Interwood Mobel maintains high standards of craftsmanship and design, ensuring that every product meets the expectations of its discerning clientele.

Ownership
Ownership Structure

The majority shareholding of Interwood Mobel (Private) Limited, ~99.9%, is held by the Farooq family. Mr. Farooq Ahmed, the Founder, owns ~17%, while his wife, Ms. Ghazala Farooq, holds ~16%. Their sons, Mr. Omar Farooq and Mr. Ali Farooq, each own ~33% of the Company’s shareholding. The remaining shareholding, roughly 0.1%, is distributed among other close relatives of the family.

Table 1: Ownership Structure
Stability

The ownership structure of Interwood Mobel (Pvt.) Limited is regarded as stable, with no anticipated changes in the near future. This stability is a result of the significant involvement of the Farooq family, who hold nearly all of the Company’s shares. The family’s deep-rooted commitment to the business ensures that the strategic vision and operational goals remain consistent.

Business Acumen

The sponsors of Interwood Mobel (Private) Limited are recognized for their strong business acumen, backed by more than forty years of extensive industry knowledge. Their long-standing presence and remarkable positioning in the furniture and interior solutions industry have been pivotal to the Company’s success.

Financial Strength

Given that, Interwood Mobel is a standalone entity, its financial strength is primarily evaluated based on the financial profiles of its sponsors and their demonstrated willingness to support the business. The sponsors are considered to possess adequate financial resources and have consistently shown a strong commitment to underpinning the Company’s financial stability.

Governance
Board Structure

The Board of Directors of the Company consists of four members, including the Chairman and three executive directors. The board is entirely dominated by the sponsoring family, which signifies a lack of independent oversight. This concentration of control within the family can limit the diversity of perspectives and independent judgment necessary for robust governance.

Members’ Profile

The Company’s members boast strong profiles, characterized by significant technical expertise and specialization in various domains, including production, retail, and furniture manufacturing. Their combined experience and knowledge enable the Company to excel in its operations and maintain high standards of quality and innovation.

Board Effectiveness

The Board has established an Audit Committee to enhance governance and oversight. This committee comprises four members who bring diverse expertise and perspectives to their roles. The Audit Committee meets bi-annually to review the Company’s financial reporting, internal controls, and risk management processes. To enhance board effectiveness and governance practices, it would be beneficial to introduce independent directors who can provide impartial oversight and bring varied expertise to the table. Such a move would not only strengthen the governance framework but also improve decision-making processes, risk management, and strategic planning, ultimately leading to enhanced accountability and sustainable growth for the Company.

Financial Transparency

Reanda Haroon Zakaria Aamir Salman Rizwan & Co., Chartered Accountants, serve as the external auditors for the Company. This esteemed firm holds a QCR rating from ICAP and is classified under category 'B' by the State Bank of Pakistan (SBP), reflecting their high standards and credibility. For the period ended June 30th, 2024, the auditors expressed an unqualified audit opinion on the Company’s financial statements. This signifies that the financial statements fairly and accurately represent the Company’s financial position in accordance with the applicable accounting standards.

Management
Organizational Structure

The organizational structure of Interwood Mobel (Private) Limited is meticulously defined across eight key departments: Operations, Sales & Marketing, Accounts, Internal Audit, and others. Each of these departments, with the exception of Internal Audit, reports directly to the Chief Executive Officer (CEO), ensuring a streamlined and cohesive management approach. The Internal Audit department operates independently, providing unbiased oversight and ensuring compliance with internal controls and regulations. The General Manager of Operations oversees several critical functions, including supply chain management, pre-production, production, plant maintenance, and information technology. This centralized leadership within the operations domain enhances efficiency and ensures that all production-related activities are well-coordinated and aligned with the Company's strategic objectives. However, the positions of Chief Financial Officer (CFO) and Chief Operating Officer (COO) remain unfilled. It is recommended to include professional and experienced resources in these roles to further strengthen the Company’s management structure and support its growth ambitions.

Chart 1: Organogram
Management Team

The management team at Interwood Mobel (Private) Limited is composed of highly experienced individuals, each representing a diverse and robust skill set. Mr. Omar Farooq, the Chief Executive Officer, holds a BSc in Furniture Design and Manufacturing and has been a dedicated member of the Company for the past 25 years. His extensive knowledge and expertise in furniture design and manufacturing have been instrumental in driving the Company’s innovation and growth. Mr. Omar Farooq is ably supported by a professional management team that brings a wealth of experience and specialized skills to the table. This team includes experts in various fields such as operations, finance, marketing, and human resources, ensuring that all aspects of the Company’s operations are managed efficiently and effectively. The team’s collaborative approach and commitment to excellence have been key factors in the Company’s sustained success and ability to adapt to market changes.

Effectiveness

To ensure efficient operations, Interwood Mobel (Private) Limited has established three key management committees: the Procurement Committee, the Supply Chain Committee, and the Human Resources Committee. Each of these committees is chaired by the Chief Executive Officer, ensuring strategic alignment and cohesive decision-making across all facets of the organization. The committees are composed of relevant department heads, bringing together specialized expertise and fostering collaborative leadership.

MIS

In 2017, the Company implemented SAP Business One as its Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system. This advanced ERP solution significantly enhances the flow of information across the organization, ensuring seamless communication and data integration. Additionally, it facilitates the efficient generation of reports required by management, enabling informed decision-making and strategic planning. The deployment of SAP Business One underscores the Company’s commitment to leveraging cutting-edge technology to drive operational excellence and continuous improvement.

Control Environment

The Company has established a robust control environment, supported by its Internal Audit and Health, Safety, and Environment (HSE) departments. The Internal Audit department conducts a variety of tests and activities to identify potential vulnerabilities and implement corrective measures. These activities are performed on a monthly basis across the Company’s factories and showrooms throughout Pakistan. The HSE department works diligently to safeguard the Company’s operations from uncertainties and mitigate risks associated with operational, environmental, and financial factors. This rigorous approach ensures that the Company’s processes are continuously monitored and enhanced, thereby protecting assets and maintaining high standards of compliance and governance. The comprehensive efforts of the Internal Audit and HSE departments highlight the Company’s commitment to maintaining a secure and efficient operational environment.

Business Risk
Industry Dynamics

In FY24, Pakistan’s nominal GDP was ~PKR 99.5 trillion (FY23: PKR 79.6 trillion), with real terms growth of ~2.52% year-over-year (YoY) (FY23: ~-0.22% growth). Industrial activities contributed ~17.8% (FY23: ~18.4%) to the GDP, while manufacturing activities accounted for ~12.0% (FY23: ~11.9%) of the total GDP. The Furniture sector, classified as a Large-Scale Manufacturing (LSM) industrial component, had a weight of around 0.51% in the Quantum Index of Manufacturing (QIM) in FY24. The sector experienced a significant increase of ~23.1% YoY during 9MFY24. The furniture industry in Pakistan is predominantly unstructured, with numerous small to medium-sized players creating a highly competitive environment with many unregulated entities. This intense competition among informal players results in a dynamic yet challenging market landscape. Local demand is met through both local production and imports, with demand linked to consumers' disposable income and replacement or new orders from businesses for office furniture. As of June 2024, average inflation stood at ~23.4% (SPLY: ~29.4%), while in the first four months of FY25, it was recorded at ~8.7% (SPLY: ~28.5%). With decreasing inflation levels and a policy rate reduction to ~15% in November 2024, revenues are expected to increase. Lower finance costs and a stable currency could also lead to higher margins. The organized segment of the sector primarily consists of players targeting high-end customers. These companies have strong brand identities and operate large retail outlet chains. Prominent players include Interwood Mobel, Habitt Furniture, National Furniture, and Chen One. These companies cater to the premium market, offering a range of high-quality, sophisticated furniture products linked to the real estate sector. In FY24, the decline in the real estate sector posed challenges for high-end furniture manufacturers. Overall, the sector is expected to perform well in FY25 with a recovery in the real estate sector, due to increasing export potential, decreasing reliance on imported furniture, declining interest rates, and inflation. However, the supply of wood could become a problem for producers due to Pakistan’s low forest cover and increased regulations to preserve trees.

Chart 2: Sector Contribution in GDP %
Relative Position

Interwood Mobel (Private) Limited maintains a formidable position in the market, bolstered by its state-of-the-art production plant and exceptional manufacturing capabilities. This advanced infrastructure enables the Company to consistently deliver high-quality products, reinforcing its reputation for excellence. While Interwood Mobel does not face direct competition from any single entity, it encounters area-specific and product-specific competition from a myriad of small to medium-sized players. These competitors, although numerous, struggle to match the scale and sophistication of Interwood Mobel’s operations. This distinctive competitive advantage allows Interwood Mobel to remain a leading force in the industry, continually setting benchmarks for quality and innovation.

Revenues

The Company generates its revenues from five main product categories: office furniture, home furniture, kitchens, wardrobes, doors, and others. The revenue stream is fairly concentrated, with office and home furniture accounting for the majority of sales. Currently, office furniture is the major contributor, representing ~40% of the revenue followed by home furniture at ~23%, Doors at ~14.49% and others. According to the management accounts for FY24, the Company’s top line reached ~PKR 4,932mln (FY23: ~PKR 4,818mln), reflecting a modest growth of ~2.4% YoY. The retail section once again emerged as the primary contributor, followed by corporate sector and then dealers.

Table 2: Category-Wise Revenue Composition
Margins

In FY24, the Company’s gross margin slightly increased to ~38.3% from ~36.6% in FY23, primarily driven by inflated prices. The operating margin also saw an uptick, reaching ~22.9% in FY24 compared to ~18.8% in the previous fiscal year, reflecting enhanced operational efficiency and cost management. However, the Company’s profit before tax declined in FY24 compared to the prior year, largely due to increased finance costs. This decline underscores the impact of the higher cost of borrowings on the Company’s overall profitability. Despite this, the net profit margin showed an improvement, rising to ~4.1% in FY24 from ~2.3% in FY23. This improvement was mainly attributed to favorable tax adjustments, which offset some of the negative impacts of the increased finance costs. Going forward, sustaining these improved margins will be critical for the Company’s financial health.

Graph 1: Revenue Margins
Sustainability

Interwood is Pakistan’s leading furniture store, specializing in producing modern furniture using high-tech manufacturing techniques that make it affordable for all segments of society. The Company is dedicated to continuously raising the standards of design, durability, and quality, ensuring it delivers optimal products. With decades of experience in the furniture industry, Interwood provides affordable wooden furniture at the best prices in Pakistan. Looking ahead, Interwood will continue to focus on large-scale projects for luxury buildings and corporate clients to drive revenue growth. Additionally, the Company is consistently working to enhance its e-commerce capabilities to better serve the growing online market.

Financial Risk
Working capital

Interwood Mobel’s working capital is primarily driven by its inventory levels, which are maintained to meet customer demand. In FY24, the Company’s inventory days increased to ~333 days, up from ~304 days in FY23. This indicates a longer period for inventory turnover, which may impact liquidity. The Company benefits from advance payments from customers, resulting in trade receivable days standing at roughly 54 days in FY24, compared to ~51 days in FY23. This positive cash flow aspect helps in managing operational costs more effectively. Consequently, the gross working capital days extended to ~387 days in FY24, from about 355 days in the previous year. On the other hand, the Company’s trade payable days also increased, reaching ~67 days in FY24, up from ~58 days in FY23. As a result, the net working capital days stood at ~320 days in FY24, compared to ~296 days in the prior fiscal year. This increase signifies a higher amount of capital tied up in the operational cycle, which can affect the Company’s liquidity and operational efficiency. Additionally, Interwood Mobel’s short-term trade leverage increased to ~18.0% in FY24, from ~12.3% in FY23, indicating sufficient capacity to secure further borrowings for working capital requirements.

Graph 2: Working Capital Cycle
Coverages

During FY24, Interwood Mobel reported an increase in Free Cash Flow from Operations (FCFO) to ~PKR 1,429mln, up from ~PKR 1,160mln in FY23. This growth was primarily driven by a reduction in taxes. However, finance costs rose significantly to ~PKR 980mln in FY24, compared to ~PKR 734mln in the previous fiscal year, due to increased total borrowings. As a result, the interest coverage ratio again experienced a modest decline to 1.5x in FY24 from 1.6x in FY23 (FY22: 2.4x). Meanwhile, the debt coverage ratio remained stable at 0.9x in FY24, consistent with FY23 (FY22: 1.0). The stability in the debt coverage ratio highlights the Company’s capacity of timely repayment of financial obligations, although the decline in the interest coverage ratio suggests a need for more effective leverage management.

Graph 3: Coverages
Capitalization

In FY24, Interwood Mobel’s leveraging increased, with the leverage ratio rising to ~35.3% from ~32.7% in FY23. This increase reflects a rise in total borrowings, which amounted to ~PKR 4,301mln in FY24, up from ~PKR 3,731mln in the previous fiscal year. The uptick in leverage was driven by both short-term and long-term borrowings to meet working capital requirements and complete large-scale projects, with short-term borrowings constituting ~68% of the total borrowings. This shift underscores the Company’s strategic approach to financing its operations and growth initiatives while maintaining a balanced capital structure.

Graph 4: Capital Structure
 
 

Dec-24

www.pacra.com


Jun-24
12M
Jun-23
12M
Jun-22
12M
A. BALANCE SHEET
1. Non-Current Assets 11,111 11,203 7,367
2. Investments 0 0 0
3. Related Party Exposure 5 36 156
4. Current Assets 6,352 5,595 5,015
a. Inventories 4,748 4,258 3,764
b. Trade Receivables 763 692 645
5. Total Assets 17,468 16,834 12,538
6. Current Liabilities 2,317 2,336 1,780
a. Trade Payables 869 945 590
7. Borrowings 4,301 3,731 4,207
8. Related Party Exposure 224 200 233
9. Non-Current Liabilities 2,329 2,474 1,192
10. Net Assets 8,298 8,094 5,125
11. Shareholders' Equity 8,298 8,094 5,125
B. INCOME STATEMENT
1. Sales 4,932 4,818 4,166
a. Cost of Good Sold (3,043) (3,057) (2,655)
2. Gross Profit 1,890 1,761 1,511
a. Operating Expenses (762) (855) (737)
3. Operating Profit 1,128 907 774
a. Non Operating Income or (Expense) 33 69 9
4. Profit or (Loss) before Interest and Tax 1,160 976 783
a. Total Finance Cost (980) (734) (477)
b. Taxation 24 (132) (96)
6. Net Income Or (Loss) 204 110 210
C. CASH FLOW STATEMENT
a. Free Cash Flows from Operations (FCFO) 1,429 1,160 1,094
b. Net Cash from Operating Activities before Working Capital Changes 548 522 651
c. Changes in Working Capital (808) (45) (692)
1. Net Cash provided by Operating Activities (259) 478 (41)
2. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Investing Activities (248) (11) (253)
3. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Financing Activities 545 (458) 287
4. Net Cash generated or (Used) during the period 38 9 (7)
D. RATIO ANALYSIS
1. Performance
a. Sales Growth (for the period) 2.4% 15.7% 14.3%
b. Gross Profit Margin 38.3% 36.6% 36.3%
c. Net Profit Margin 4.1% 2.3% 5.0%
d. Cash Conversion Efficiency (FCFO adjusted for Working Capital/Sales) 12.6% 23.1% 9.7%
e. Return on Equity [ Net Profit Margin * Asset Turnover * (Total Assets/Shareholders' Equity )] 2.5% 1.7% 4.1%
2. Working Capital Management
a. Gross Working Capital (Average Days) 387 355 344
b. Net Working Capital (Average Days) 320 296 291
c. Current Ratio (Current Assets / Current Liabilities) 2.7 2.4 2.8
3. Coverages
a. EBITDA / Finance Cost 1.6 2.0 2.6
b. FCFO / Finance Cost+CMLTB+Excess STB 0.9 0.9 1.0
c. Debt Payback (Total Borrowings+Excess STB) / (FCFO-Finance Cost) 3.3 3.1 3.0
4. Capital Structure
a. Total Borrowings / (Total Borrowings+Shareholders' Equity) 35.3% 32.7% 46.4%
b. Interest or Markup Payable (Days) 95.1 95.9 91.7
c. Entity Average Borrowing Rate 22.2% 17.0% 10.5%

Dec-24

www.pacra.com

Dec-24

www.pacra.com

  1. Rating Team Statements
    1. Rating is just an opinion about the creditworthiness of the entity and does not constitute a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell any security of the entity rated or to buy, hold, or sell the security rated, as the case may be. (Chapter III; 14-3-(x))
    2. Conflict of Interest
      1. The Rating Team or any of their family members have no interest in this rating (Chapter III; 12-2-(j))
      2. PACRA, the analysts involved in the rating process, and members of its rating committee and their family members do not have any conflict of interest relating to the rating done by them (Chapter III; 12-2-(e) & (k))
      3. The analyst is not a substantial shareholder of the customer being rated by PACRA [Annexure F; d-(ii)]
      4. Explanation: for the purpose of the above clause, the term "family members" shall include only those family members who are dependent on the analyst and members of the rating committee.
  2. Restrictions
    1. No director, officer, or employee of PACRA communicates the information acquired by him for use for rating purposes to any other person, except where required under law to do so. (Chapter III; 10-(5))
    2. PACRA does not disclose or discuss with outside parties or make improper use of the non-public information which has come to its knowledge during a business relationship with the customer. (Chapter III; 10-7-(d))
    3. PACRA does not make proposals or recommendations regarding the activities of rated entities that could impact a credit rating of the entity subject to rating. (Chapter III; 10-7-(k))
  3. Conduct of Business
    1. PACRA fulfills its obligations in a fair, efficient, transparent, and ethical manner and renders high standards of services in performing its functions and obligations. (Chapter III; 11-A-(a))
    2. PACRA uses due care in the preparation of this Rating Report. Our information has been obtained from sources we consider to be reliable, but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. PACRA does not, in every instance, independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing this Rating Report. (Clause 11-(A)(p))
    3. PACRA prohibits its employees and analysts from soliciting money, gifts, or favors from anyone with whom PACRA conducts business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(q))
    4. PACRA ensures before the commencement of the rating process that an analyst or employee has not had a recent employment or other significant business or personal relationship with the rated entity that may cause or may be perceived as causing a conflict of interest. (Chapter III; 11-A-(r))
    5. PACRA maintains the principle of integrity in seeking rating business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(u))
    6. PACRA promptly investigates in the event of misconduct or a breach of the policies, procedures, and controls, and takes appropriate steps to rectify any weaknesses to prevent any recurrence, along with suitable punitive action against the responsible employee(s). (Chapter III; 11-B-(m))
  4. Independence & Conflict of Interest
    1. PACRA receives compensation from the entity being rated or any third party for the rating services it offers. The receipt of this compensation has no influence on PACRA’s opinions or other analytical processes. In all instances, PACRA is committed to preserving the objectivity, integrity, and independence of its ratings. Our relationship is governed by two distinct mandates: i) rating mandate - signed with the entity being rated or issuer of the debt instrument, and ii) fee mandate - signed with the payer, which can be different from the entity.
    2. PACRA does not provide consultancy/advisory services or other services to any of its customers or their associated companies and associated undertakings that are being rated or have been rated by it during the preceding three years, unless it has an adequate mechanism in place ensuring that the provision of such services does not lead to a conflict of interest situation with its rating activities. (Chapter III; 12-2-(d))
    3. PACRA discloses that no shareholder directly or indirectly holding 10% or more of the share capital of PACRA also holds directly or indirectly 10% or more of the share capital of the entity which is subject to rating or the entity which issued the instrument subject to rating by PACRA. (Chapter III; 12-2-(f))
    4. PACRA ensures that the rating assigned to an entity or instrument is not affected by the existence of a business relationship between PACRA and the entity or any other party, or the non-existence of such a relationship. (Chapter III; 12-2-(i))
    5. PACRA ensures that the analysts or any of their family members shall not buy, sell, or engage in any transaction in any security which falls in the analyst’s area of primary analytical responsibility. This clause, however, does not apply to investments in securities through collective investment schemes. (Chapter III; 12-2-(l))
    6. PACRA has established policies and procedures governing investments and trading in securities by its employees and for monitoring the same to prevent insider trading, market manipulation, or any other market abuse. (Chapter III; 11-B-(g))
  5. Monitoring and Review
    1. PACRA monitors all the outstanding ratings continuously, and any potential change therein due to any event associated with the issuer, the security arrangement, the industry, etc., is disseminated to the market immediately and in an effective manner after appropriate consultation with the entity/issuer. (Chapter III; 17-(a))
    2. PACRA reviews all the outstanding ratings periodically on an annual basis. Provided that public dissemination of annual review and in an instance of change in rating will be made. (Chapter III; 17-(b))
    3. PACRA initiates an immediate review of the outstanding rating upon becoming aware of any information that may reasonably be expected to result in downgrading of the rating. (Chapter III; 17-(c))
    4. PACRA engages with the issuer and the debt securities trustee to remain updated on all information pertaining to the rating of the entity/instrument. (Chapter III; 17-(d))
  6. Probability of Default
    1. PACRA’s Rating Scale reflects the expectation of credit risk. The highest rating has the lowest relative likelihood of default (i.e., probability). PACRA’s transition studies capture the historical performance behavior of a specific rating notch. Transition behavior of the assigned rating can be obtained from PACRA’s Transition Study available at our website. (www.pacra.com) However, the actual transition of rating may not follow the pattern observed in the past. (Chapter III; 14-3(f)(vii))
  7. Proprietary Information
    1. All information contained herein is considered proprietary by PACRA. Hence, none of the information in this document can be copied or otherwise reproduced, stored, or disseminated in whole or in part in any form or by any means whatsoever by any person without PACRA’s prior written consent.

Dec-24

www.pacra.com