Rating History
Dissemination Date Long-Term Rating Short-Term Rating Outlook Action Rating Watch
30-Nov-24 A A1 Stable Maintain -
01-Dec-23 A A1 Stable Initial -
About the Entity

Tandlianwala Sugar Mills Limited commenced operations in Nov-92. The company is engaged in the manufacturing and sale of Refined Sugar, Ethanol, and CO2. The company is majorly owned by Akhtar Family. The overall control of the company vests in seven-member Board of Directors (BoD), including the CEO. The installed capacities are | Sugar - crushing at 48,500 TCD | Distillery to produce 265,000 liters of EPD | CO2. TSML plants are located at Faisalabad, DIK and Muzaffargarh, Punjab.

Rating Rationale

The assigned ratings affirm Tandlianwala Sugar Mills Limited (TSML) as a strong player in Pakistan’s sugar, ethanol, and CO2 sectors, leveraging an integrated operational model. The assigned ratings also factor in the moderate business risk profile inherent to Pakistan's sugar industry, shaped by its relatively low susceptibility to economic cyclicality yet pronounced exposure to seasonal and climatic volatilities. Key risk drivers include fluctuations in sugarcane yields and quality, influenced by agronomic conditions and cyclical variations in crop production. Government-mandated sugarcane support prices, also weigh on millers’ profitability. Additionally, raw material price volatility further accentuates operational uncertainty, necessitating adept supply chain and cost management. The competitive landscape, while fragmented with numerous players, is characterized by medium-to-low competitive intensity, underpinned by the indispensable nature of sugar in consumer staples. The sector's low substitution risk also fortifies demand stability. The MY24 season, while recovering from the aftermath of devastating floods that reduced cultivation by ~4.7%, is expected to deliver ~7 million MT of sugar, signaling resilience in the face of adversity. Due to the surplus stocks, the government has allowed the sugar millers to export ~0.79 million MT, ensuring liquidity relief for the industry. On the financial profile side, TSML’s strategically diversified revenue mix of 70% from sugar, 29% from ethanol, and 1% from CO2 fortifies its resilience against sectoral cyclicality. During 9MMY24, TSML’s topline has reflected an ~8.6% YoY decline primarily due to reduced ethanol exports. Despite this, sugar sales showed resilience with a 5% YoY increase, driven by domestic demand and pricing strength. Profitability metrics were mixed, with gross margins rising backed by effective procurement while net margins compressed to due to higher financing costs in a high-interest-rate environment. TSML's significant asset base of PKR 46.6 billion, coupled with equity of PKR 13.6 billion, underscores its financial stability and capacity for sustained growth. On the other side, leverage indicators continue to remain elevated on account of higher utilization of short-term borrowing. TSML upholds a prudently managed financial profile, characterized by moderate leverage that supports operational stability and growth potential. Governance and management continue to be critical strengths for TSML. Anchored by the Akhtar family’s strategic oversight, the leadership team leverages decades of expertise to steer the Company through evolving industry dynamics.

Key Rating Drivers

The ratings are contingent upon TSML's ability to maintain its market leadership, sustain business volumes, and preserve healthy margins while achieving optimal utilization of production capacities. Equally critical is the disciplined management of working capital to ensure liquidity buffers. In the prevailing challenging economic landscape, characterized by demand-side pressures, TSML’s relative performance against industry peers will remain a key determinant of its creditworthiness.

Profile
Legal Structure

Tandlianwala Sugar Mills Limited (TSML or ‘the Company’) is a publicly listed entity, incorporated in November 1998. Recognized as a prominent player in Pakistan’s sugar, ethanol, and carbon dioxide sectors, TSML has consistently demonstrated industry leadership. Having commenced production of its first refined sugar in 1992, the Company has since pursued a strategy of continuous expansion, solidifying its position as a key contributor to the country’s agro-industrial landscape.

Background

Tandlianwala Sugar Mills Limited (TSML) commenced its journey in 1992 with the production of its first refined sugar, setting the foundation for a series of strategic expansions. The Company established its first sugar mill in Faisalabad, with an initial crushing capacity of 12,500 TCD, followed by a second mill in Dera Ismail Khan (DIK) and a third in Muzaffargarh, each with a crushing capacity of 16,000 TCD. Further diversifying its operations, TSML inaugurated its first distillery in Faisalabad in 2008, with a daily production capacity of 125,000 liters, and a second distillery in Muzaffargarh in 2013, boasting a capacity of 140,000 liters per day. Additionally, Unit 1 is equipped with a CO2 plant, underscoring the Company’s commitment to integrated, multi-faceted growth within the sector.

Operations

Tandlianwala Sugar Mills Limited (TSML) operates from its corporate headquarters in Lahore, with key production facilities located in Faisalabad, Dera Ismail Khan, and Muzaffargarh. The Company boasts a total crushing capacity of 48,500 TCD, supported by distilleries capable of producing a combined total of 265,000 liters of ethanol daily. In the most recent marketing year (MY24), TSML experienced a modest decline in sugar production, with output reaching 332,388 M.T, down from 333,663 M.T in MY23, yielding a recovery rate of 9.12%. Furthermore, TSML’s operational capabilities are enhanced by a fleet of six storage tanks, which collectively offer a monthly storage capacity of 15,600 MT, facilitating the secure storage of ethanol and petroleum products.

Ownership
Ownership Structure

The majority ownership of Tandlianwala Sugar Mills Limited (TSML) is held by the Akhtar Group and its associated family members, including the Directors, CEO, their spouses, and minor children, who collectively control approximately 84% of the Company’s shares. Banks and financial institutions hold a marginal stake of around 0.16%, while the local public owns approximately 16%. Additionally, 5% of the Company’s shares are classified as free float, contributing to the liquidity and market presence of TSML.

Stability

Tandlianwala Sugar Mills Limited (TSML) enjoys a strong and stable ownership structure, with the Akhtar family holding the majority of controlling interests. This consolidated control ensures continuity in governance and strategic decision-making, fostering a stable operational environment. The Company’s ownership is viewed as resilient, with the Akhtar family’s long-term commitment serving as a key pillar of its ongoing stability and growth.

Business Acumen

The Akhtar family, as the sponsors of Tandlianwala Sugar Mills Limited (TSML), brings a wealth of experience and a proven track record of success across a diverse portfolio of large-scale manufacturing enterprises in Pakistan. Akbar Akhtar Khan, with over two decades of leadership excellence, has played a pivotal role in steering TSML to its current stature. In addition to his leadership at TSML, he serves as the Managing Director of Superior Textile Mills Ltd., further underscoring his extensive expertise in managing and growing industrial operations at a strategic level.

Financial Strength

As of 9MMY24, Tandlianwala Sugar Mills Limited (TSML) demonstrates strong financial resilience, with a substantial asset base of approximately PKR 46.6 billion and a robust equity base of around PKR 13.6 billion. This solid financial position not only underscores the Company's stability but also highlights its capacity for future expansion and strategic investments. The significant equity base provides a cushion against market fluctuations, while the sizeable asset base reflects the value of TSML’s operational infrastructure and long-term growth potential. This financial strength positions the Company well to navigate industry challenges and capitalize on emerging opportunities.

Governance
Board Structure

The Company’s Board of Directors (BoD) consists of two Executive Directors and five Non-Executive Directors. The current composition highlights a need for enhanced independent oversight and greater diversity to strengthen the governance framework. The Board is chaired by a Non-Executive Director and is predominantly influenced by the Akhtar Family, with six Nominee Directors.

Members’ Profile

The Board of Directors of Tandlianwala Sugar Mills Limited (TSML) is predominantly composed of members from the sponsoring Akhtar family, ensuring a strong familial presence in governance. However, the Board’s expertise is complemented by a well-balanced mix of professionals with significant experience in the sugar industry, along with experts in business, finance, and legal matters. Mr. Ghazi Akhtar Khan, the Chairman of the Board, brings invaluable experience in both the sugar and banking sectors. In addition to his leadership at TSML, Mr. Khan serves as President of Lotte Akhtar Beverages (LTAB). His extensive background includes a senior management role in the International Banking Division of Toronto Dominion Bank (now TD Bank) and a managerial position at Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co. (now KPMG) in Toronto, Canada. Mr. Khan is a Member of the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants and holds a Bachelor of Commerce (Honors) degree from the University of Toronto, Canada. His diverse expertise and global experience significantly enhance the Board’s strategic oversight and decision-making capabilities.

Board Effectiveness

The Board of Directors (BoD) of Tandlianwala Sugar Mills Limited (TSML) is supported by four key committees: the Audit Committee, the HR & Remuneration Committee, the Risk Management Committee, and the Nomination Committee. Mr. Humayun Akhtar, a Non-Executive Director, effectively chairs both the Audit and HR & Remuneration Committees, bringing valuable oversight to these critical areas. The responsibilities related to the Risk Management and Nomination Committees are handled directly at the Board level, ensuring a strategic and comprehensive approach to governance. The minutes of all committee meetings are meticulously maintained, ensuring transparency and a thorough record of discussions and decisions for future reference. This structured committee framework reinforces the Board’s effectiveness in monitoring, guiding, and steering the Company towards its long-term objectives.

Financial Transparency

Tandlianwala Sugar Mills Limited (TSML) upholds a high standard of financial transparency through the appointment of UHY Hassan Naeem & Co. Chartered Accountants as its external auditors. The firm holds a satisfactory Quality Control Review (QCR) rating, and is on SBP's A category list, reflecting its credibility and professional competence. For the financial year ending September 2023, UHY Hassan Naeem & Co. issued an unqualified opinion on the Company’s financial statements, further reinforcing the accuracy, reliability, and integrity of TSML’s financial reporting.

Management
Organizational Structure

Tandlianwala Sugar Mills Limited (TSML) operates with a well-defined organizational structure, where each department is led by a department head who reports directly to the CEO. The six key departments within the Company are Banking & Finance, Operations, Control & Maintenance (OC&M), New Projects, Sales & Trading (S&T), IT Accounts & Tax, and Export & Audit. All functional heads provide direct reports to the CEO, who is responsible for making strategic decisions. This streamlined structure, while effective in ensuring operational efficiency, also underscores the potential key-man risk, as the CEO plays a central role in the Company's decision-making and overall management.

Management Team

Mr. Akbar Khan, the CEO of Tandlianwala Sugar Mills Limited (TSML), has been with the Company for over 3 decades. He holds a Bachelor of Science in Business with a focus on Accounting and Finance from Wright State University, USA, as well as a Master’s in Business Administration from Ball State University, USA. Before returning to Pakistan, Mr. Khan served as the Chief Auditor at a respected accounting firm in the United States for five years. His extensive experience and leadership have been integral to TSML’s growth and success. The management team at TSML boasts long tenures within the Company, bringing a wealth of experience in both the sugar industry and their respective fields. Mr. Ahmad Jehanzeb Khan, the Chief Financial Officer (CFO), has been with the Company for 32 years, further strengthening the leadership team’s deep-rooted expertise in the industry and financial management. This continuity and seasoned leadership underscore the team’s capability to navigate the complexities of the business and drive TSML’s strategic objectives.

Effectiveness

This long-standing association fosters a deep understanding of the Company’s operations and the sugar industry, allowing for well-informed decision-making and a consistent approach to driving growth and profitability. The synergy between the leadership and their collective experience in the sugar industry, finance, and operations is a testament to the team’s capability to navigate challenges and capitalize on emerging opportunities, ensuring the continued success of TSML.

MIS

TSML leverages an in-house developed business management software suite to streamline and optimize day-to-day operations. The bespoke ERP applications cover critical functions such as Finance, Procurement, Human Resources, Production, Sales, Laboratory Analysis, and Automation, ensuring comprehensive oversight and integration across all departments. The system is continuously updated to meet evolving business needs, with enhancements and maintenance managed by a dedicated Development Team. This proactive approach to MIS enables TSML to maintain operational efficiency, improve decision-making through accurate data insights, and adapt swiftly to industry demands.

Control Environment

Tandlianwala Sugar Mills Limited (TSML) maintains a strong control environment to ensure operational efficiency and compliance with established policies and procedures. The Company has instituted a dedicated internal audit function tasked with implementing, monitoring, and evaluating its control framework. The internal audit department conducts quarterly evaluations to assess the effectiveness of processes and adherence to regulatory and organizational standards. Its findings and recommendations are directly reported to the Audit Committee, reinforcing a culture of accountability and continuous improvement. This proactive approach to internal controls underscores TSML's commitment to governance and operational excellence.

Business Risk
Industry Dynamics

Pakistan’s sugar industry stands as the second-largest agro-based sector in the country, comprising approximately 90 mills with an annual crushing capacity of 80-90 million MT. Despite its scale, the industry faces persistent challenges, particularly due to the Government-regulated sugarcane support prices, which are set based on farmers’ costs and often constrain millers' profitability. In MY23, sugar production declined by approximately 15%, reaching 6.7 million MT, primarily due to the devastating floods that damaged standing crops and reduced the recovery rate. To manage the surplus inventory, the Government permitted the export of 0.5 million MT of sugar, offering some relief to the industry. The current MY24 season also reflects the lingering effects of flash floods, with a 4.7% loss in cultivated area. Despite these setbacks, sugar production is estimated to recover slightly to around 7 million MT. The Government’s continued support for exports is expected to provide a much-needed boost to millers, helping them navigate challenging industry dynamics and mitigate financial pressures.

Relative Position

Owing to numerous industry players, companies relatively have good market share. Tandlianwala Sugar Mill contributes ~ 5% to the total sugar production of Pakistan

Revenues

The Company derives its revenue from a diversified portfolio of products, primarily sugar (~70%), ethanol (~29%), and Top Gas (~1%). A geographical split of revenue indicates that approximately 70% is generated from the local market, while the remaining 30% originates from exports. During the first nine months of MY24 (9MMY24), the Company's topline contracted by 8.6%, declining to PKR 32 billion compared to PKR 35 billion in the corresponding period of the previous year (9MMY23). This decline is primarily attributable to a volumetric reduction in ethanol exports. Conversely, sugar sales exhibited a 5% increase year-on-year, mitigating the impact of ethanol's lower export volumes. Furthermore, favorable price dynamics for both sugar and ethanol provided support to overall revenue generation, partially offsetting the decline in volumes. Looking ahead, revenue stability is anticipated, underpinned by resilient local market demand for sugar and ethanol and the potential for improved export conditions. The Company's ability to sustain pricing power and optimize its product mix across domestic and international markets will be critical in maintaining its topline trajectory amidst evolving industry dynamics.

Margins

The Company's profitability margins reflect a mixed performance during 9MMY24, with an improvement in operational efficiencies but persistent pressures on the bottom line. Gross Profit Margin rose to 16% (9MMY23: 13%), driven by improved pricing dynamics in sugar and ethanol. This translated into enhanced Operating Profit Margin (13%, up from 10%) and PBIT Margin (13%, up from 10%), underscoring the Company’s ability to manage production costs effectively while benefiting from favorable market conditions. However, Net Profit Margin contracted to 3% from 4% in 9MMY23. This decline is primarily attributed to a substantial increase in finance costs, which rose to 8% of sales (9MMY23: 5%), reflecting the impact of elevated borrowing costs in a high-interest-rate environment. Additionally, the Effective Tax Rate increased to 27% (9MMY23: 25%), further weighing on net profitability. The Company demonstrated improved operational cash generation, as evidenced by a Cash Conversion Efficiency of 11% (9MMY23: 10%). However, when adjusted for working capital changes, the Cash Conversion Efficiency turned negative (-25%), highlighting the challenges posed by elevated working capital requirements during the period. Overall, the improved operational margins and steady EBITDA generation provide a sound foundation for the Company’s creditworthiness.

Sustainability

The Company’s future performance will primarily hinge on the sugar division and the evolving dynamics of the sugar industry. This segment remains a key revenue driver, and its stability will be critical to the Company’s overall financial health. Meanwhile, the ethanol division is expected to maintain its steady performance, supported by consistent demand and pricing trends.High prices in the international market and opportunities for sugar exports are anticipated to support the Company’s topline growth. However, achieving sustainable profitability will require a strategic focus on reducing the leverage structure. Lowering debt levels will not only alleviate the burden of finance costs but also enhance net margins, further strengthening the Company’s financial resilience

Financial Risk
Working capital

The Company’s working capital management has shown signs of increased operational inefficiencies during 9MMY24. Inventories witnessed a sharp rise, averaging 111 days compared to 75 days in 9MMY23, driven by higher levels of both raw materials (32 days vs. 21 days) and finished goods (79 days vs. 54 days). This increase reflects extended stockholding periods, which could tie up liquidity and strain cash flows if not managed effectively. Trade receivables remain negligible at less than a day on average, underscoring the Company’s efficient receivables collection practices. However, trade payables averaged 7 days, a notable increase from 2 days in 9MMY23, indicating improved utilization of supplier credit. Despite this, the Gross Working Capital cycle lengthened to 111 days (9MMY23: 75 days), resulting in a higher Net Working Capital cycle of 103 days compared to 73 days in the previous period. Leverage indicators present a stable picture, with Short-Term Total Leverage remaining neutral at 0% (9MMY23: -5%) and Short-Term Trade Leverage improving to -6% from -13%, reflecting reduced dependency on short-term trade credit. Additionally, the Current Ratio improved to 2.42x (9MMY23: 1.97x), indicating adequate coverage of short-term liabilities through current assets. While the Company’s liquidity position remains strong, as reflected in its current ratio, the elongation of the working capital cycle and higher inventory levels could weigh on operational efficiency and cash flow management. Tightening inventory controls and optimizing the working capital cycle will be critical in mitigating financial risks and sustaining the Company’s financial stability.

Coverages

The Company's coverage indicators reflect a mixed performance during 9MMY24, highlighting challenges in its financial risk profile. The EBITDA-to-Finance Cost ratio has declined to 1.74x (9MMY23: 2.27x), signaling a reduced capacity to cover finance costs through operational earnings. Similarly, the FCFO-to-Finance Cost ratio has weakened to 1.26x from 1.87x, indicating tighter cash flow coverage of financial obligations.Over the past three years, operational cash flow growth has remained minimal, emphasizing the importance of consistent enhancements in cash flow generation to reinforce liquidity. The Company has maintained moderate coverage of its total financing obligations, though challenges persist in its ability to generate sufficient cash to address these commitments effectively. Debt repayment timelines have lengthened due to weaker cash flow generation, highlighting the need for improved financial efficiency. Additionally, liquidity pressures remain evident, reflecting the necessity for stronger cash flow management and better utilization of liquid resources to meet short-term financial obligations. While the current coverage levels are sufficient to meet immediate needs, sustained improvements in operational performance and cash flow stability are critical to mitigating financial risks and preserving the Company's credit standing.

Capitalization

The Company's capitalization structure reflects a moderately high reliance on debt financing, with total borrowings constituting 69% of the capital structure in 9MMY24, up from 65% in the previous period. This increase indicates a growing leverage position, which could heighten financial vulnerability if not managed prudently. Short-term borrowings account for a significant 82% of the total borrowings, rising from 70% in 9MMY23. This shift towards short-term funding increases refinancing risk and underscores the importance of diversifying the debt profile to ensure long-term financial stability. Interest or markup payable days have improved, decreasing to approximately 65 days from 94 days in the corresponding period, signaling better payment discipline. Additionally, the slight positive spread over KIBOR reflects relatively favorable borrowing terms, marking an improvement from the negative spread in 9MMY23.The Company's capitalization profile, while currently manageable, would benefit from strategic deleveraging and a shift toward a more balanced funding mix.

 
 

Nov-24

www.pacra.com


Jun-24
9M
Sep-23
12M
Sep-22
12M
A. BALANCE SHEET
1. Non-Current Assets 15,005 15,262 15,540
2. Investments 0 0 0
3. Related Party Exposure 0 0 0
4. Current Assets 31,657 15,545 16,358
a. Inventories 20,950 5,131 7,959
b. Trade Receivables 20 4 18
5. Total Assets 46,662 30,807 31,898
6. Current Liabilities 13,067 7,814 8,356
a. Trade Payables 1,115 618 197
7. Borrowings 19,088 9,509 11,700
8. Related Party Exposure 0 0 0
9. Non-Current Liabilities 886 886 776
10. Net Assets 13,620 12,598 11,066
11. Shareholders' Equity 13,620 12,598 11,066
B. INCOME STATEMENT
1. Sales 32,246 42,290 32,300
a. Cost of Good Sold (27,221) (36,617) (28,537)
2. Gross Profit 5,025 5,673 3,763
a. Operating Expenses (849) (1,223) (1,098)
3. Operating Profit 4,176 4,450 2,665
a. Non Operating Income or (Expense) (19) 158 0
4. Profit or (Loss) before Interest and Tax 4,156 4,608 2,666
a. Total Finance Cost (2,753) (2,459) (1,677)
b. Taxation (381) (640) (471)
6. Net Income Or (Loss) 1,022 1,509 518
C. CASH FLOW STATEMENT
a. Free Cash Flows from Operations (FCFO) 3,444 5,091 2,984
b. Net Cash from Operating Activities before Working Capital Changes 1,531 2,561 1,511
c. Changes in Working Capital (11,590) 465 (722)
1. Net Cash provided by Operating Activities (10,059) 3,026 789
2. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Investing Activities (266) (55) (233)
3. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Financing Activities 9,579 (2,606) (13)
4. Net Cash generated or (Used) during the period (745) 365 543
D. RATIO ANALYSIS
1. Performance
a. Sales Growth (for the period) 1.7% 30.9% 19.1%
b. Gross Profit Margin 15.6% 13.4% 11.7%
c. Net Profit Margin 3.2% 3.6% 1.6%
d. Cash Conversion Efficiency (FCFO adjusted for Working Capital/Sales) -25.3% 13.1% 7.0%
e. Return on Equity [ Net Profit Margin * Asset Turnover * (Total Assets/Shareholders' Equity )] 10.4% 12.8% 4.8%
2. Working Capital Management
a. Gross Working Capital (Average Days) 111 57 81
b. Net Working Capital (Average Days) 103 53 77
c. Current Ratio (Current Assets / Current Liabilities) 2.4 2.0 2.0
3. Coverages
a. EBITDA / Finance Cost 1.7 2.3 2.2
b. FCFO / Finance Cost+CMLTB+Excess STB 1.2 1.3 0.6
c. Debt Payback (Total Borrowings+Excess STB) / (FCFO-Finance Cost) 0.5 0.7 2.7
4. Capital Structure
a. Total Borrowings / (Total Borrowings+Shareholders' Equity) 58.4% 43.0% 51.4%
b. Interest or Markup Payable (Days) 64.9 53.6 98.3
c. Entity Average Borrowing Rate 23.9% 21.9% 12.2%

Nov-24

www.pacra.com

Nov-24

www.pacra.com

  1. Rating Team Statements
    1. Rating is just an opinion about the creditworthiness of the entity and does not constitute a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell any security of the entity rated or to buy, hold, or sell the security rated, as the case may be. (Chapter III; 14-3-(x))
    2. Conflict of Interest
      1. The Rating Team or any of their family members have no interest in this rating (Chapter III; 12-2-(j))
      2. PACRA, the analysts involved in the rating process, and members of its rating committee and their family members do not have any conflict of interest relating to the rating done by them (Chapter III; 12-2-(e) & (k))
      3. The analyst is not a substantial shareholder of the customer being rated by PACRA [Annexure F; d-(ii)]
      4. Explanation: for the purpose of the above clause, the term "family members" shall include only those family members who are dependent on the analyst and members of the rating committee.
  2. Restrictions
    1. No director, officer, or employee of PACRA communicates the information acquired by him for use for rating purposes to any other person, except where required under law to do so. (Chapter III; 10-(5))
    2. PACRA does not disclose or discuss with outside parties or make improper use of the non-public information which has come to its knowledge during a business relationship with the customer. (Chapter III; 10-7-(d))
    3. PACRA does not make proposals or recommendations regarding the activities of rated entities that could impact a credit rating of the entity subject to rating. (Chapter III; 10-7-(k))
  3. Conduct of Business
    1. PACRA fulfills its obligations in a fair, efficient, transparent, and ethical manner and renders high standards of services in performing its functions and obligations. (Chapter III; 11-A-(a))
    2. PACRA uses due care in the preparation of this Rating Report. Our information has been obtained from sources we consider to be reliable, but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. PACRA does not, in every instance, independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing this Rating Report. (Clause 11-(A)(p))
    3. PACRA prohibits its employees and analysts from soliciting money, gifts, or favors from anyone with whom PACRA conducts business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(q))
    4. PACRA ensures before the commencement of the rating process that an analyst or employee has not had a recent employment or other significant business or personal relationship with the rated entity that may cause or may be perceived as causing a conflict of interest. (Chapter III; 11-A-(r))
    5. PACRA maintains the principle of integrity in seeking rating business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(u))
    6. PACRA promptly investigates in the event of misconduct or a breach of the policies, procedures, and controls, and takes appropriate steps to rectify any weaknesses to prevent any recurrence, along with suitable punitive action against the responsible employee(s). (Chapter III; 11-B-(m))
  4. Independence & Conflict of Interest
    1. PACRA receives compensation from the entity being rated or any third party for the rating services it offers. The receipt of this compensation has no influence on PACRA’s opinions or other analytical processes. In all instances, PACRA is committed to preserving the objectivity, integrity, and independence of its ratings. Our relationship is governed by two distinct mandates: i) rating mandate - signed with the entity being rated or issuer of the debt instrument, and ii) fee mandate - signed with the payer, which can be different from the entity.
    2. PACRA does not provide consultancy/advisory services or other services to any of its customers or their associated companies and associated undertakings that are being rated or have been rated by it during the preceding three years, unless it has an adequate mechanism in place ensuring that the provision of such services does not lead to a conflict of interest situation with its rating activities. (Chapter III; 12-2-(d))
    3. PACRA discloses that no shareholder directly or indirectly holding 10% or more of the share capital of PACRA also holds directly or indirectly 10% or more of the share capital of the entity which is subject to rating or the entity which issued the instrument subject to rating by PACRA. (Chapter III; 12-2-(f))
    4. PACRA ensures that the rating assigned to an entity or instrument is not affected by the existence of a business relationship between PACRA and the entity or any other party, or the non-existence of such a relationship. (Chapter III; 12-2-(i))
    5. PACRA ensures that the analysts or any of their family members shall not buy, sell, or engage in any transaction in any security which falls in the analyst’s area of primary analytical responsibility. This clause, however, does not apply to investments in securities through collective investment schemes. (Chapter III; 12-2-(l))
    6. PACRA has established policies and procedures governing investments and trading in securities by its employees and for monitoring the same to prevent insider trading, market manipulation, or any other market abuse. (Chapter III; 11-B-(g))
  5. Monitoring and Review
    1. PACRA monitors all the outstanding ratings continuously, and any potential change therein due to any event associated with the issuer, the security arrangement, the industry, etc., is disseminated to the market immediately and in an effective manner after appropriate consultation with the entity/issuer. (Chapter III; 17-(a))
    2. PACRA reviews all the outstanding ratings periodically on an annual basis. Provided that public dissemination of annual review and in an instance of change in rating will be made. (Chapter III; 17-(b))
    3. PACRA initiates an immediate review of the outstanding rating upon becoming aware of any information that may reasonably be expected to result in downgrading of the rating. (Chapter III; 17-(c))
    4. PACRA engages with the issuer and the debt securities trustee to remain updated on all information pertaining to the rating of the entity/instrument. (Chapter III; 17-(d))
  6. Probability of Default
    1. PACRA’s Rating Scale reflects the expectation of credit risk. The highest rating has the lowest relative likelihood of default (i.e., probability). PACRA’s transition studies capture the historical performance behavior of a specific rating notch. Transition behavior of the assigned rating can be obtained from PACRA’s Transition Study available at our website. (www.pacra.com) However, the actual transition of rating may not follow the pattern observed in the past. (Chapter III; 14-3(f)(vii))
  7. Proprietary Information
    1. All information contained herein is considered proprietary by PACRA. Hence, none of the information in this document can be copied or otherwise reproduced, stored, or disseminated in whole or in part in any form or by any means whatsoever by any person without PACRA’s prior written consent.

Nov-24

www.pacra.com