Rating History
Dissemination Date Long-Term Rating Short-Term Rating Outlook Action Rating Watch
15-Oct-26 A+ A1 Stable Maintain -
15-Oct-25 A+ A1 Stable Maintain -
15-Oct-24 A+ A1 Stable Maintain -
16-Oct-23 A+ A1 Stable Maintain -
21-Oct-22 A+ A1 Stable Maintain -
About the Entity

Mughal Iron & Steel Industries Limited, a public limited company incorporated in 2010, is primarily engaged in the manufacturing and sale of mild steel products related to ferrous segments. Mughal operates with a melting capacity of 590,000M.T., rerolling capacity of 630,000M.T., and non-ferrous recycling capacity of 90,000M.T. Currently, a seven-member BoD is monitoring the overall functioning under the chairmanship of Mr. Mirza Javed Iqbal. Mr. Khurram Javaid serves as the CEO and is the driving force behind the Company.

Rating Rationale

Mughal Iron & Steel Industries Limited ("Mughal" or "the Company") is a prominent player in the steel industry. During FY26, the sector operated in a two-phased environment: macroeconomic stabilization and easing financial conditions supported business activity for most of the year, while renewed inflationary and heightened geopolitical uncertainty tempered momentum in the latter part. The sector continues to face reliance on imported raw materials, elevated energy costs and regulatory changes, although the country's structural housing and infrastructure requirements continue to underpin steel demand. Against this, Mughal strengthened its position in the domestic ferrous segment, where sales volumes increased, supported by higher production at its melting furnaces and rolling mills, with capacity utilization improving to around 59% and 52%, respectively (FY25: 51% and 48%). Major works on the balancing, modernization and replacement (BMR) of its bar re-rolling mill have been completed, and the upgraded mill is expected to enhance operational efficiency and product flexibility. The non-ferrous segment was temporarily suspended in view of volatility in international commodity markets and associated risks, resulting in lower export volumes. Consequently, net sales moderated to PKR 77.958bln in FY26 (FY25: PKR 89.414bln), mainly due to lower average selling prices and reduced exports, with the ferrous segment contributing around 91.5% of revenue. Despite the lower topline, the gross margin improved to 11.1% (FY25: 9.1%) on a favorable sales mix, operational efficiencies and disciplined inventory management, while the net margin rose to 3.2% (FY25: 1.08%) as finance costs eased amid the declining interest rate environment. Working capital management remained sound, supported by a strong liquidity position. Borrowings rose to PKR 38.068bln (FY25: PKR 28.014bln), mainly on account of fresh long-term financing for permanent working capital and the BMR of the bar re-rolling mill, taking leveraging to 51.2% (FY25: 49.3%). Subsequent to the year end, the Company’s subsidiary achieved the Commercial Operation Date (COD) of the main 31.50 MW turbine of its 36.50 MW captive hybrid power plant with effect from August 31, 2026; as a captive source of power, the plant is expected to reduce energy costs and further strengthen operational efficiency.

Key Rating Drivers

The ratings remain dependent on the Company's ability to sustain its business profile amid evolving sector conditions, including the regulatory environment, demand trends in the housing and infrastructure sectors, and movements in raw material prices and energy costs. As per management, the non-ferrous segment has been suspended on a temporary basis, and any resumption, given its relatively higher-margin contribution, will be monitored for its impact on the topline and profitability. Maintaining the improvement in overall revenues and margins, together with timely servicing of the higher debt, remains important. Sustained working capital discipline, particularly receivable collection, the successful commissioning of the BMR project and a reliable energy supply from its hybrid captive power plant are also key considerations.

Profile
Legal Structure

Mughal Iron & Steel Industries Limited (“MISIL” or “the Company”) was incorporated in Pakistan as a public limited company in 2010 and was listed on the Pakistan Stock Exchange in March 2015, under the Engineering sector. The Company’s registered office is located in Lahore, while its manufacturing facility is situated at 17 KM Sheikhupura Road, Kot Abdul Malik.


Background

MISIL traces its roots to “Mughal Steel”, a partnership concern established over six decades ago and managed by the Company’s major sponsors. In 2010, the business was restructured and incorporated as a public limited company to achieve better governance, transparency, and growth prospects. The Company was subsequently listed on the PSX in March 2015 under the Engineering sector. Over the years, MISIL has evolved into a fully integrated manufacturer in the ferrous segment, producing a wide range of steel products, while also diversifying into non-ferrous offerings such as copper and aluminum. The Company primarily caters to the domestic housing sector (urban and rural), and the large infrastructure projects.


Operations

MISIL's operations are comprised of two segments: ferrous and non-ferrous. The ferrous segment is the principal line of business and contributes the majority of revenues. Over time, the Company has developed a broad product portfolio within this segment, including billets, girders, T-Iron, rebars, and other steel products, enabling it to serve the diverse needs of the housing, industrial, and infrastructure sectors. The non-ferrous segment, though relatively smaller in scale, primarily comprises copper and aluminum ingots and has historically supported profitability through export proceeds, particularly from sales to China. However, operations of this segment are currently suspended on a temporary basis, leaving the ferrous segment as the sole operating segment.


Ownership
Ownership Structure

The Sponsor family holds a controlling stake (around ~75.3%) with the remaining ownership distributed among financial institutions and the general public. As of June 30, 2026, the Company’s ordinary shareholding was concentrated with Directors/CEO & family (43.20%) and Associated Companies/related parties (32.16%), while Banks/DFIs/NBFIs held 5.16% and the General Public 7.91%. On June 17, 2025, the Company further issued 33,062,447 Ordinary Class-C shares through a rights issue.


Stability

The ownership structure of MISIL is regarded as stable, with majority shareholding vested in the Mughal family. As the founding sponsors have a longstanding association with the steel business and their sustained commitment significantly reduces the likelihood of any ownership changes in the foreseeable future.


Business Acumen

With over six decades in the business, the sponsoring Mughal family demonstrates extensive experience in the steel and allied industries. Their longstanding presence reflects both resilience and strong market knowledge, positioning them as one of the key players in the sector.


Financial Strength

The financial health of the Company is considered adequate, underpinned by sponsor support. The owners not only provide strategic direction in line with the evolving business environment but have also demonstrated their commitment by injecting funds on an as-and-when-required basis.


Governance
Board Structure

Board Structure The Board comprises seven members, including two executive directors, two independent directors, and three non-executive directors. The executive and non-executive directors represent the sponsoring family, including the Chairman, Mr. Mirza Javed Iqbal, and the CEO. The Board also includes a female nominee director.


Members’ Profile

The Board possesses the requisite skills, knowledge, and experience to provide effective oversight. The Chairman, Mr. Javed Iqbal, brings over four decades of experience in the local steel industry. The Board’s composition reflects the sponsoring family’s significant presence and continuity in leadership, while the inclusion of independent directors, Mr. Shoaib Ahmed Khan and Mr. Muhammad Aslam Bhatti, adds an independent perspective to the Company’s governance framework. Overall, the Board combines extensive industry experience with a longstanding association with the Company.


Board Effectiveness

The Company’s governance framework is supported by an active Board and a committee structure that facilitates oversight of key functions, including financial reporting, human resource management, remuneration, and sustainability. During FY26, the Board held six meetings, with satisfactory attendance and leave duly recorded for absences, reflecting regular engagement in strategic and oversight matters. The Company has three Board committees: the Audit Committee, HR & Remuneration Committee, and Environment, Social and Governance (ESG) Committee, each including an independent director in accordance with applicable SECP requirements. During the year, the Audit Committee held five meetings, the HR & Remuneration Committee held two meetings, and the ESG Committee convened once. Following the election of directors, the committees were reconstituted, with changes in membership and chairmanship to align with the revised Board composition.


Financial Transparency

The Company’s external auditors, are ,M/s. Fazal Mahmood & Co. and M/s. Muniff Ziauddin & Co., expressed an unqualified opinion on the financial statements for the year ended June 30, 2026.


Management
Organizational Structure

The Company follows a streamlined organizational structure with clear roles and significant delegation. The organogram is divided between the CFO and COO, with departments reporting accordingly, while executive directors and the CEO report to the Board. This structure supports effective decision-making and operational efficiency.


Management Team

Mr. Khurram Javed, the CEO, has over a decade of professional experience and holds an MBA from Coventry University. He has enhanced the Company’s HR quality by inducting professionals across diverse fields and also serves as CEO of four group companies: Mughal Energy Limited, Mughal Steel Re-Rolling Industries Limited, Mughal International IMPEX Limited, and Indus Engineering (Pvt.) Limited. He is supported by a skilled and experienced management team. The team also includes Mr. Shakeel Ahmad, Chief Operating Officer, who brings over a decade of experience in strategic market positioning, sales growth, and brand development. Supporting him is Mr. Muhammad Zafar Iqbal, Chief Financial Officer, a Fellow Member of ICAP with extensive expertise in finance, taxation, and strategic planning.


Effectiveness

MISIL does not have formal management committees; instead, departmental heads hold regular meetings to review key performance areas and report to their respective executive directors.


MIS

MIS reports are prepared and customized as per management’s requirements on a daily, weekly, and monthly basis, covering areas such as re-ordering sheets and financial facilities status.


Control Environment

The Company has an Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system in place, which is currently being used for reporting purposes. The system facilitates the integration of key business functions and supports the timely generation of financial and operational information for management. This enhances data accuracy, strengthens internal controls, and improves the reliability of management reporting and decision-making.


Business Risk
Industry Dynamics

During FY26, Pakistan's long steel (rebar) sector continued to operate in a medium-to-high business risk environment, shaped by cyclicality, imported scrap reliance, and elevated energy costs. The Federal government's PSDP allocation for FY26 was raised to ~PKR 4.2 trillion (FY25: ~PKR 3.68 trillion), up ~15% YoY, and the FY26 budget also eased customs duties on key inputs — additional customs duty on steel scrap was cut from 2% to 0% and on melting scrap from 3% to 0%, while duty on semi-finished products such as billets was halved from 11% to 5% — improving cost competitiveness for local re-rollers. Reconstruction needs following the Jul–Sep 2025 floods across Punjab and Sindh, together with a government mark-up subsidy for construction and housing-sector tax incentives, are expected to support rebar demand, though the extent of translation into higher volumes remains contingent on the pace of public-sector project execution. On the monetary front, after an extended easing cycle through FY25 and 1HFY26 that had brought the policy rate down to 10.5%, the State Bank of Pakistan raised the policy rate by 100bps to 11.5% in April 2026 amid a spike in global oil prices linked to Middle East tensions, and has held it at that level through July 2026 — reversing part of the earlier relief to financing costs and keeping leverage-sensitive sector margins under continued pressure. Meanwhile, the copper segment remains exposed to global trade disruptions, including U.S.–China tariff tensions and regulatory shifts affecting scrap availability and export flows under Pakistan's Export Facilitation Scheme (EFS). Overall, sector profitability is expected to improve gradually, contingent on sustained demand recovery and a stable interest rate environment.


Relative Position

MISIL ranks among the leading long steel manufacturers in Pakistan. The Company benefits from a well-established brand, extensive dealer network, and diversified product portfolio. This diversification supports stable demand across market segments and enhances resilience against cyclical variations. Consistent operational performance, coupled with a sustained focus on quality and efficiency, underpins MISIL’s strong position within the domestic steel industry.


Revenues

During FY26, MISIL reported net sales of Rs. 77,958 million (FY25: Rs. 89,414 million), a moderation of around 12.8%, mainly reflecting lower average selling prices and reduced export volumes. The domestic ferrous segment remained the backbone of the business, with sales volumes increasing over the previous year on the back of stronger local demand, primarily on account of housing and infrastructure requirements. This was reflected in higher production, with output at the melting furnaces rising by around 15.5% to 347,140 MT (FY25: 300,640 MT) and at the rolling mills by around 6.4% to 325,171 MT (FY25: 305,488 MT), against unchanged installed capacities of 590,000 MT and 630,000 MT, respectively. Ferrous sales held broadly steady at Rs. 71,402 million (FY25: Rs. 73,548 million) and contributed around 91.5% of net revenue. Non-ferrous sales declined to Rs. 6,630 million (FY25: Rs. 15,932 million), as operations of the segment have been temporarily suspended in view of prevailing market dynamics, volatility in international commodity markets and associated risks, with management prioritizing the domestic ferrous business.


Margins

During FY26, Mughal's gross margin improved to 11.1% (FY25: 9.1%), with gross profit rising to Rs. 8,657 million (FY25: Rs. 8,138 million) despite the lower topline. Cost of sales declined at a faster pace than net sales, supported by a more favorable sales mix as the Company focused on the domestic ferrous segment, enhanced operational efficiencies and disciplined inventory management. The net profit margin also improved to 3.2% (FY25: 1.08%), largely on account of lower finance costs, which declined to Rs. 3,821 million (FY25: Rs. 5,723 million) amid the easing interest rate environment. The improvement came despite a higher tax charge during the year, and net profit after tax rose to Rs. 2,487 million (FY25: Rs. 966 million).


Sustainability

MISIL demonstrates a growing commitment to sustainability through operational efficiency, responsible sourcing, and energy conservation. Its production facilities operate on Electric Induction Furnaces and Direct Rolling Technology, significantly reducing thermal energy usage, complemented by European-origin energy-efficient rolling mills and automated load management systems. The Company also utilizes a water treatment plant to recycle process water, reducing freshwater dependency. Supply chain sustainability is supported through the use of verified recycled steel scrap and a shift toward rail-based scrap transportation to minimize logistics emissions. Additionally, MISIL’s circular production model—converting steel scrap into finished products—positions it as a low-carbon steel producer. Additionally, the commencement of operations of the Company’s hybrid power plant and the balancing, modernization and replacement (BMR) of its bar re-rolling mill further support operational efficiency and long-term environmental resilience. On the diversification front, the Company's participation, as part of a larger consortium, in the privatization of Gujranwala Electric Power Company (GEPCO), which has progressed to the due diligence stage, reflects its intent to broaden its business base.


Financial Risk
Working capital

As at end-Jun'26, Mughal's working capital management remained sound, supported by a notable improvement in inventory management and a strong liquidity position. Inventory days improved further to 50 (FY25: 72), mainly on account of the disciplined inventory management and faster stock movement amid higher ferrous sales volumes, alongside the scaling back of non-ferrous operations, which carried higher inventory and price risk. Receivable days increased to 89 (FY25: 53), on account of higher local ferrous sales and a temporary slowdown in the June quarter, with all balances considered good. As a result, the net working capital cycle stood at 121 days (FY25: 110 days), with the longer receivable cycle partly offset by the shorter inventory holding period. The Company funds its working capital through internal cash generation, Sukuk placements and bank lines. Short-term borrowings stood at Rs. 21,616 million (FY25: Rs. 22,885 million), while a long-term facility of Rs. 10,000 million was availed from United Bank Limited to finance permanent working capital requirements. The liquidity profile strengthened, with the current ratio at 10.2x (FY25: 5.6x) and cash and bank balances of Rs. 6,661 million (FY25: Rs. 3,092 million).


Coverages

Free Cash Flows from operations (FCFO) increased sharply to Rs. 8,018 million in FY26 (FY25: Rs. 5,668 million), a growth of 41.5%, following declines of 4.2% in FY25. The increase was supported by higher operating profitability and lower tax outflows during the year. Finance costs eased considerably to Rs. 3,674 million (FY25: Rs. 5,561 million), aided by the declining interest rate environment. As a result, the interest coverage ratio improved to 2.2x (FY25: 1.0x; FY24: 1.0x; FY23: 1.9x). The debt payback period stood at 3.8 years, reflecting the stronger cash generation despite higher borrowings.


Capitalization

As at end-Jun'26, Mughal's leveraging stood at 51.2% (end-Jun'25: 49.3%). Total borrowings increased to Rs. 38,068 million (end-Jun'25: Rs. 28,014 million), mainly on account of fresh long-term financing of Rs. 10.0bln from United Bank Limited for permanent working capital and Rs. 1.96bln from Bank of Punjab for the BMR of the bar re-rolling mill. Short-term borrowings reduced to 56.8% of total borrowings (end-Jun'25: 81.7%), reflecting a shift toward longer-tenor financing, while the Company continued to use short-term Sukuk for working capital needs and timely repaid them on maturity. Shareholders' equity increased to Rs. 36,216 million (end-Jun'25: Rs. 28,819 million), supported by profit retention and a revaluation surplus on fixed assets.


 
 

Oct-26

www.pacra.com


(PKR mln)


Jun-26
12M
Jun-25
12M
Jun-24
12M
A. BALANCE SHEET
1. Non-Current Assets 32,110 22,915 19,653
2. Investments 0 0 50
3. Related Party Exposure 3,446 3,624 3,947
4. Current Assets 50,536 41,154 46,544
a. Inventories 9,335 12,082 23,418
b. Trade Receivables 22,855 15,232 10,806
5. Total Assets 86,093 67,693 70,195
6. Current Liabilities 4,974 7,376 5,500
a. Trade Payables 2,658 5,278 2,566
7. Borrowings 38,068 28,014 35,694
8. Related Party Exposure 0 0 0
9. Non-Current Liabilities 6,834 3,484 2,865
10. Net Assets 36,216 28,819 26,135
11. Shareholders' Equity 36,216 28,819 26,135
B. INCOME STATEMENT
1. Sales 77,958 89,414 92,383
a. Cost of Good Sold (69,302) (81,276) (84,665)
2. Gross Profit 8,657 8,138 7,718
a. Operating Expenses (1,416) (1,132) (1,065)
3. Operating Profit 7,241 7,006 6,652
a. Non Operating Income or (Expense) 174 74 331
4. Profit or (Loss) before Interest and Tax 7,415 7,080 6,983
a. Total Finance Cost (3,821) (5,723) (6,364)
b. Taxation (1,106) (392) 1,381
6. Net Income Or (Loss) 2,487 966 2,000
C. CASH FLOW STATEMENT
a. Free Cash Flows from Operations (FCFO) 8,018 5,807 5,920
b. Net Cash from Operating Activities before Working Capital Changes 4,337 (379) 82
c. Changes in Working Capital (8,391) 8,084 (2,597)
1. Net Cash provided by Operating Activities (4,053) 7,705 (2,515)
2. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Investing Activities (1,632) (3,025) (4,311)
3. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Financing Activities 10,049 (4,919) 7,339
4. Net Cash generated or (Used) during the period 4,364 (239) 512
D. RATIO ANALYSIS
1. Performance
a. Sales Growth (for the period) -12.8% -3.2% 37.1%
b. Gross Profit Margin 11.1% 9.1% 8.4%
c. Net Profit Margin 3.2% 1.1% 2.2%
d. Cash Conversion Efficiency (FCFO adjusted for Working Capital/Sales) -0.5% 15.5% 3.6%
e. Return on Equity [ Net Profit Margin * Asset Turnover * (Total Assets/Shareholders' Equity )] 7.6% 3.5% 7.8%
2. Working Capital Management
a. Gross Working Capital (Average Days) 139 126 126
b. Net Working Capital (Average Days) 121 110 118
c. Current Ratio (Current Assets / Current Liabilities) 10.2 5.6 8.5
3. Coverages
a. EBITDA / Finance Cost 2.2 1.4 1.2
b. FCFO / Finance Cost+CMLTB+Excess STB 1.2 0.9 0.6
c. Debt Payback (Total Borrowings+Excess STB) / (FCFO-Finance Cost) 3.8 20.9 -43.0
4. Capital Structure
a. Total Borrowings / (Total Borrowings+Shareholders' Equity) 51.2% 49.3% 57.7%
b. Interest or Markup Payable (Days) 58.5 39.3 72.2
c. Entity Average Borrowing Rate 11.4% 16.7% 21.1%

Oct-26

www.pacra.com

Oct-26

www.pacra.com

  1. Rating Team Statements
    1. Rating is just an opinion about the creditworthiness of the entity and does not constitute a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell any security of the entity rated or to buy, hold, or sell the security rated, as the case may be. (Chapter III; 14-3-(x))
    2. Conflict of Interest
      1. The Rating Team or any of their family members have no interest in this rating (Chapter III; 12-2-(j))
      2. PACRA, the analysts involved in the rating process, and members of its rating committee and their family members do not have any conflict of interest relating to the rating done by them (Chapter III; 12-2-(e) & (k))
      3. The analyst is not a substantial shareholder of the customer being rated by PACRA [Annexure F; d-(ii)]
      4. Explanation: for the purpose of the above clause, the term "family members" shall include only those family members who are dependent on the analyst and members of the rating committee.
  2. Restrictions
    1. No director, officer, or employee of PACRA communicates the information acquired by him for use for rating purposes to any other person, except where required under law to do so. (Chapter III; 10-(5))
    2. PACRA does not disclose or discuss with outside parties or make improper use of the non-public information which has come to its knowledge during a business relationship with the customer. (Chapter III; 10-7-(d))
    3. PACRA does not make proposals or recommendations regarding the activities of rated entities that could impact a credit rating of the entity subject to rating. (Chapter III; 10-7-(k))
  3. Conduct of Business
    1. PACRA fulfills its obligations in a fair, efficient, transparent, and ethical manner and renders high standards of services in performing its functions and obligations. (Chapter III; 11-A-(a))
    2. PACRA uses due care in the preparation of this Rating Report. Our information has been obtained from sources we consider to be reliable, but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. PACRA does not, in every instance, independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing this Rating Report. (Clause 11-(A)(p))
    3. PACRA prohibits its employees and analysts from soliciting money, gifts, or favors from anyone with whom PACRA conducts business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(q))
    4. PACRA ensures before the commencement of the rating process that an analyst or employee has not had a recent employment or other significant business or personal relationship with the rated entity that may cause or may be perceived as causing a conflict of interest. (Chapter III; 11-A-(r))
    5. PACRA maintains the principle of integrity in seeking rating business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(u))
    6. PACRA promptly investigates in the event of misconduct or a breach of the policies, procedures, and controls, and takes appropriate steps to rectify any weaknesses to prevent any recurrence, along with suitable punitive action against the responsible employee(s). (Chapter III; 11-B-(m))
  4. Independence & Conflict of Interest
    1. PACRA receives compensation from the entity being rated or any third party for the rating services it offers. The receipt of this compensation has no influence on PACRA’s opinions or other analytical processes. In all instances, PACRA is committed to preserving the objectivity, integrity, and independence of its ratings. Our relationship is governed by two distinct mandates: i) rating mandate - signed with the entity being rated or issuer of the debt instrument, and ii) fee mandate - signed with the payer, which can be different from the entity.
    2. PACRA does not provide consultancy/advisory services or other services to any of its customers or their associated companies and associated undertakings that are being rated or have been rated by it during the preceding three years, unless it has an adequate mechanism in place ensuring that the provision of such services does not lead to a conflict of interest situation with its rating activities. (Chapter III; 12-2-(d))
    3. PACRA discloses that no shareholder directly or indirectly holding 10% or more of the share capital of PACRA also holds directly or indirectly 10% or more of the share capital of the entity which is subject to rating or the entity which issued the instrument subject to rating by PACRA. (Chapter III; 12-2-(f))
    4. PACRA ensures that the rating assigned to an entity or instrument is not affected by the existence of a business relationship between PACRA and the entity or any other party, or the non-existence of such a relationship. (Chapter III; 12-2-(i))
    5. PACRA ensures that the analysts or any of their family members shall not buy, sell, or engage in any transaction in any security which falls in the analyst’s area of primary analytical responsibility. This clause, however, does not apply to investments in securities through collective investment schemes. (Chapter III; 12-2-(l))
    6. PACRA has established policies and procedures governing investments and trading in securities by its employees and for monitoring the same to prevent insider trading, market manipulation, or any other market abuse. (Chapter III; 11-B-(g))
  5. Monitoring and Review
    1. PACRA monitors all the outstanding ratings continuously, and any potential change therein due to any event associated with the issuer, the security arrangement, the industry, etc., is disseminated to the market immediately and in an effective manner after appropriate consultation with the entity/issuer. (Chapter III; 17-(a))
    2. PACRA reviews all the outstanding ratings periodically on an annual basis. Provided that public dissemination of annual review and in an instance of change in rating will be made. (Chapter III; 17-(b))
    3. PACRA initiates an immediate review of the outstanding rating upon becoming aware of any information that may reasonably be expected to result in downgrading of the rating. (Chapter III; 17-(c))
    4. PACRA engages with the issuer and the debt securities trustee to remain updated on all information pertaining to the rating of the entity/instrument. (Chapter III; 17-(d))
  6. Probability of Default
    1. PACRA’s Rating Scale reflects the expectation of credit risk. The highest rating has the lowest relative likelihood of default (i.e., probability). PACRA’s transition studies capture the historical performance behavior of a specific rating notch. Transition behavior of the assigned rating can be obtained from PACRA’s Transition Study available at our website. (www.pacra.com) However, the actual transition of rating may not follow the pattern observed in the past. (Chapter III; 14-3(f)(vii))
  7. Proprietary Information
    1. All information contained herein is considered proprietary by PACRA. Hence, none of the information in this document can be copied or otherwise reproduced, stored, or disseminated in whole or in part in any form or by any means whatsoever by any person without PACRA’s prior written consent.

Oct-26

www.pacra.com