Rating History
Dissemination Date Long-Term Rating Short-Term Rating Outlook Action Rating Watch
28-Aug-26 A+ A1 Stable Maintain -
29-Aug-25 A+ A1 Stable Maintain -
30-Aug-24 A+ A1 Stable Upgrade -
01-Sep-23 A A1 Stable Maintain -
02-Sep-22 A A1 Stable Initial -
About the Entity

TWA incorporated in Pakistan as a private limited company on October 01, 1980. Board consists of eight directors. Mr. Junaid Iqbal is the CEO, while Mr. Saad Muzaffar Waraich is the President of the Company and Mr. Asif Inam is the Deputy CEO & COO, they all have a strong telecom industry profile.

Rating Rationale

Trans World Associates (Pvt.) Limited (“The Company” or “TWA”) is the private sector entity in Pakistan and the only telecom operator that owns and operates a private submarine fiber optic cable system, a distinction that underscores its strategic role in the country’s digital infrastructure. In addition to its proprietary cable system, TWA is also a consortium partner in multiple international submarine cable projects and a landing partner for 2Africa subsea cable system, one of the largest undersea cable projects globally, ensuring enhanced global connectivity and network resilience. The Company owns and manages its own landing station in Pakistan, enabling direct access to international bandwidth. Through its bandwidth distribution and network, TWA delivers reliable connectivity to telecom operators, ISPs, and enterprises nationwide. In Pakistan, there are three submarine cable operators: PTCL, TWA, and Cybernet. These operators handle the internet traffic in Pakistan, delivering bandwidth to cellular mobile operators, ISPs, corporate organizations, and SMEs. The telecom industry in Pakistan is undergoing a structural transformation, driven by rapid digitization across both consumer and enterprise segments. This accelerating digital shift is creating new avenues for telecom operators to diversify beyond traditional connectivity services into data-centric and value-added offerings. Industry dynamics remain broadly supportive: total telecom subscriptions reached 210mln by July 2026 at ~83.35% tele-density, sector revenue rose to PKR 1,075bln in CY25 (+12.3% YoY) on ARPU-led growth, and mobile data usage grew to ~14,153 petabytes (+8.7% YoY), sustaining demand for the international and domestic bandwidth capacity TWA supplies; Pakistan’s installed international bandwidth capacity stood at ~17.2Tbps by mid-2025, of which ~13.0Tbps was activated. The surge in cloud services, artificial intelligence applications, and fintech adoption further supports a structurally high demand outlook for data capacity. To cater to this rising demand, TWA is pursuing multiple initiatives, including continuous expansion of its existing fiber optic capacity, while simultaneously undertaking significant enhancements through long-haul network upgradation and expansion into data centers. These initiatives are poised to strengthen Pakistan’s domestic network backbone, improve service redundancy, and enhance international connectivity, thereby positioning TWA as a critical enabler of the country’s digital ecosystem. During CY25, TWA’s revenue grew to ~PKR 15,713mln (CY24: ~PKR 13,311mln), an increase of 18.0%, driven primarily by the Carrier, Wholesale, and International Business segments. The Company has implemented a robust internal control system across the organization which is complemented by top-notch IT, business insight & intelligence, and financial reporting solutions. The Company’s financial risk profile is considered adequate with modest coverages, adequate cashflows and working capital cycle. Capital structure is leveraged, with borrowings primarily consisting of short- and long-term loans to fund working capital, network, and capacity expansion.

Key Rating Drivers

The ratings are dependent on the Company’s ability to maintain its leadership position in niche markets amid an increasingly capital-intensive operating environment. Consistent revenue growth, improved margins and coverages, and adherence to prudent financial management, as outlined in financial projections, remain critical. As the capital structure becomes leveraged, maintenance of sound financial discipline is imperative to hold.

Profile
Legal Structure

Trans World Associates (Pvt.) Limited (“the Company”/ “Transworld”/ “TWA”) was incorporated in Pakistan as a private limited company on October 01, 1980, under the Companies Act, 1913 (now the Companies Act, 2017). The registered and head office of the Company is situated at 24, Retalia Building, G-6 Markaz, Islamabad.


Background

The Company is a subsidiary of Orastar Limited, which holds a 90% stake. Three companies currently operate under the TWA umbrella: (i) Trans World Enterprise Services (Pvt.) Ltd. (TES), (ii) Trans World Infrastructure Services (Pvt.) Ltd. (TIS), and (iii) TES Media (Pvt.) Ltd. (TMPL).


Operations

TWA commenced operations in 2006. Its principal activity is to establish and operate telecommunication systems and provide Long Distance and International (LDI) telecommunication services under the license issued by the Pakistan Telecommunication Authority (PTA). Pakistan currently has three Tier-1 submarine cable operators, Pakistan Telecommunication Company Limited (PTCL), TWA, and Cybernet. TWA wholly owns and operates two submarine cable systems, TW-1 (a ~1,300km Karachi–UAE–Oman link) and SEA-ME-WE-5 (landing station), and is a consortium partner in SEA-ME-WE-6 (SMW6), for which substantial capex has already been incurred. Previously guided for operational readiness by 1QCY27, SMW6’s timeline has since slipped further, the closure of the Strait of Hormuz disrupted construction access to the Gulf Extension’s remaining landing segments (UAE, Bahrain, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Oman), and a specialized cable-laying vessel assigned to the Pakistan segment was disabled in a collision at Karachi Port. Consequently, the previously revised Project Acceptance date of March 30, 2027 is now subject to further uncertainty’ however, the management indicated that KSA-Bahrain crossing has made some progress and the regulatory approvals are almost final and the partial route can be used as the network has been laid by the Company. TWA also serves as the landing partner for the Karachi branch of the 2Africa submarine cable system, 2Africa’s Gulf Extension has similarly been affected by the regional disruption, and a revised completion timeline is uncertain.


Ownership
Ownership Structure

Orastar Limited holds 90% of TWA’s shares; the remaining 10% is held by the heirs of the late Dr. Omar Bin Abdul Muniem Al Zawawi. Orastar is a BVI-incorporated company managed by directors based in Jersey.


Stability

Orastar Limited is an institutional investor focused on private-equity placements, principally in unlisted technology, IT, and power-generation assets. Orastar increased its stake in TWA to 90% in January 2022, reflecting sustained confidence in Pakistan’s telecom and IT sectors; no change in ownership has occurred since.


Business Acumen

The Sponsor’s investment profile spans both local and international jurisdictions, reflecting diversified experience and an ability to navigate complex operating and financing environments, relevant given the geopolitically-driven execution risk TWA is currently managing on SMW6.


Financial Strength

Sponsor financial strength is assessed as adequate to strong, underpinned by Orastar’s institutional private-equity backing. It is worth noting that TWA’s own financing plan (the new bilateral facility and the existing Meezan Bank syndicate facility) is being arranged at the operating-company level rather than through sponsor equity injection.


Governance
Board Structure

The Board comprises eight directors, six non-executive and two executives. Mr. Junaid Iqbal Khan serves as the CEO, while also acting as a non-executive director on the board.


Members’ Profile

The Board continues to combine deep telecom-sector and financial expertise. Mr. Junaid Iqbal Khan is a former senior executive at Zain, Motorola, Jazz, and PTCL. Mr. Iskander Alex Shalaby is the former Chairman & CEO of Mobinil and a former AT&T executive. Syed Bashir Ahmad was formerly Head of Private Banking at ABN AMRO, ING, and Bank of Singapore, and is currently CEO of Halkin Investments. Mr. Iain David Johns is Group Head of Private Client Services at JTC and holds board roles at MAS Singapore and the Jersey FSC. Syed Mukhtar Ahmed is the former EVP International Communications at PTCL and advises Transworld. Mr. Pervez Iftikhar is an independent telecom policy consultant and founding CEO of USF Pakistan. Mr. Khursheed Ashraf holds board/committee roles at Siemens LLC Oman and NEWREST WACASCO. Mr. Nauman Rafique is a seasoned finance and legal professional with nearly 30 years of experience in audit, taxation, and corporate governance. He is a Senior Partner at Suriya Nauman Rehan & Co. (UHY International), served as CFO for the US$800 million Ghazi Barotha Hydropower Project and advising the World Bank, ADB, and GIZ on public sector tax reforms. Collectively, they bring over four decades of leadership experience each, ensuring robust governance and strategic oversight.


Board Effectiveness

The Board operates through three committees, a Finance Committee, an Audit & Tax Committee, and a Technical & Investment Committee. All board members are professionals and have diverse experience in the different market segments related to IT, telecommunication, and banking.


Financial Transparency

The Company’s financial statements for FY2025 were audited by A. F. Ferguson & Co., an auditor categorized in the ‘A’ category under the State Bank of Pakistan (SBP) list of approved auditors. The auditors did not concur with management’s accounting treatment of expensing borrowing costs incurred in connection with the financing of the SMW6 project, with the matter being highlighted in their audit report for the year ended December 31, 2025. Following the completion of the FY2025 audit, the Company appointed KPMG Taseer Hadi & Co., also an ‘A’ category auditor under the SBP list, as its statutory auditor.


Management
Organizational Structure

TWA has a lean organizational structure, and a majority of the senior management has been associated with the Company for a long time. The structure of the Company is divided into different functional departments, namely: (i) Finance, (ii) Engineering, (iii) Commercial, (iv) HR, (v) IT, (vi) Government Relations & Admin, (vii) Internal Audit, and (viii) Governance.


Management Team

The management team of Trans World is well-experienced and led by Mr. Saad Muzaffar Waraich, the President, who is an experienced ICT leader, with a background spanning technology, organizational transformation, and sales operations. He has held senior roles at global and national firms, including Nokia, IBM, Comptel, and Nokia Siemens Networks, as well as major Pakistani telcos like PTCL and Ufone. He is supported by Mr. Aasif Inam, Deputy CEO & COO, who brings extensive telecom-sector experience driving strategic growth and innovation. Mr. Naveed Malik, the CFO, has 30+ years of experience and has been associated with TWA since 2010.


Effectiveness

Currently, TWA has Pricing, Procurement & Investment committees in place, with departmental heads holding regular joint sessions to align on business strategy.


MIS

The Company has strengthened its IT capabilities through an outsourced technology model, enabling access to specialized expertise and scalable IT support. A real-time management information and dashboard system, based on Power BI, supports management oversight and facilitates timely identification and resolution of performance shortfalls. The outsourced IT function provides support across key areas including infrastructure, operations, application development, and ERP & CRM systems.


Control Environment

The Company maintains a stringent control environment, including an independent internal audit function and regular third-party audits, and has an established Cyber Security Framework, relevant given TWA’s role as critical national digital infrastructure. In 2025, TWA established an Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) framework to further strengthen internal controls and risk governance, a positive development that should support more structured monitoring of the geopolitical, execution, and financing risks now facing the Company.


Business Risk
Industry Dynamics

Pakistan’s telecom sector is mature on subscriber metrics, total subscriptions reached 210mln in July 2026 at ~83.35% tele density, but structurally underpenetrated on data infrastructure. Sector revenue rose to PKR 1,075bln in CY25 (CY24: PKR 957bln, +12.3%), driven by ARPU-led growth and data monetization, while mobile data usage grew to ~14,153 petabytes in FY25 (+8.7% YoY), sustaining derived demand for the international and domestic bandwidth capacity TWA supplies. Pakistan’s installed international bandwidth capacity stood at ~17.2Tbps by mid-2025 (~13.0Tbps activated)[MO1] , carried across SMW4, SMW5, IMEWE, AAE-1, PEACE, TW-1, 2Africa and the upcoming SMW6 and Africa1, with landing rights concentrated among PTCL (SMW4, IMEWE, AAE-1, Africa1), TWA (SMW5, TW-1, 2Africa), and Cybernet (PEACE). Regulatory developments, RoW abolition, the National Fiberization/Connectivity Plans, and district-level class licensing, are broadly supportive of continued bandwidth demand, while PTCL’s completed Telenor acquisition (Dec-25) and the finalized Fixed Satellite Services framework (Apr-26, paving the way for Starlink) introduce medium-term competitive and substitution risk. Wholesale bandwidth pricing continues to decline sharply on a per-Mbps basis, a global, capacity-driven trend, requiring TWA and peers to grow volumes and diversify into data centers and managed services to sustain margins. The medium-term industry outlook remains constructive, anchored in structural data-demand growth and supportive regulation, though near-term execution risk on Gulf-corridor cable projects and pricing pressure are the key monitorable.  [MO1]Please include most latest available data for 2026.


Relative Position

TWA remains one of Pakistan’s three Tier-1 international bandwidth providers alongside PTCL and Cybernet, and is the only private-sector operator to wholly own a submarine cable system (TW-1), in addition to its SMW5 landing station and consortium interests in SMW6 and landing partner for 2Africa. PTCL remains the dominant incumbent by scale and balance-sheet depth, a position reinforced by its completed acquisition of Telenor Pakistan (Dec-25) and the Telenor–Ufone merger, raising the prospect of a more vertically-integrated competitor able to bundle mobile, fixed, and wholesale capacity, a development that bears monitoring for its effect on TWA’s carrier/wholesale demand over time. Cybernet (PEACE cable stake, alongside its StormFiber retail business) and SCO (terrestrial Pak-China OFC route) represent smaller alternative capacity sources. On infrastructure footprint, TWA’s network spans its wholly-owned TW-1 cable, SMW5 landing rights, ongoing domestic long-haul/metro network upgrades under its 2023 LDI license, and a newly completed data center at its CLS Building landing station in Karachi (already generating recurring tenant revenue). This route diversity has, however, been tested by disruptions linked to regional conflicts; in response, TWA has upgraded SMW5 and TW-1 to meet rising domestic demand, including 5G readiness, while diversifying domestic backhaul via LDI-licensed long-haul arrangements with Wateen and Jazz. Strategically, the Company continues to pursue cost-saving domestic long-haul initiatives alongside its international capacity build-out, positioning TWA to capture continued wholesale demand growth once SMW6 capacity is eventually commissioned, while its multi-cable, multi-route profile remains a differentiator versus smaller Tier-1/Tier-2 peers.


Revenues

TWA’s revenue increased to ~PKR 15,713mln in CY25 (CY24: ~PKR 13,311mln; CY23: ~PKR 10,618mln), reflecting 18.0% YoY growth (CY24: 25.4%; CY23: 21.4%; 3-year CAGR: 21.6%). By segment, Carrier remained the largest contributor at ~42% of CY25 sales, followed by Wholesale and International Business at ~18% each. Corporate & Other (~8%), LDI Voice (~3%), and inter-company revenue, primarily from related party Transworld Enterprise Services (~11%), accounted for the remaining revenue. Revenue growth moderated further to 9.5% YoY in 1QCY26 (Mar-26).


Margins

Gross margin improved modestly to 47.3% in CY25 (CY24: 46.8%), although it remained below the CY23 level of 52.2%, indicating a lower margin base amid competitive wholesale bandwidth pricing and higher depreciation following the capitalization of capacity upgrades and long-haul network investments. Operating margin moderated further to 33.9% in CY25 (CY24: 36.2%; CY23: 42.1%), partly reflecting a notable increase in selling and marketing expenses. Net margin declined to 11.3% in CY25 from 16.8% in CY24 (CY23: 17.9%), primarily due to a significant increase in finance costs, which rose to PKR 1,796mln in CY25 from PKR 583mln in CY24 (+208%), alongside a higher effective tax rate of 41.6% (CY24: 31.3%). The increase in finance costs largely reflected borrowing costs associated with the 319-day critical path displacement of the SMW6 cable system, which were expensed rather than capitalized as part of CWIP to ensure appropriate presentation of the related asset.


Sustainability

TWA’s growth prospects remain underpinned by structural demand for international and domestic bandwidth, rising data consumption, 5G readiness, and government fiberization targets (tower fiberization of 60% from ~16–18% currently), and by the Company’s multi-cable, multi-route international profile. Network expansion continues on two fronts: internationally, via SMW6 and the 2Africa landing role; and domestically, via LDI-licensed long-haul/metro upgrades, including the Wateen  and Jazz multi-route fiber lease agreements aimed at reducing domestic bandwidth costs, alongside interim SMW5 and TW-1 capacity additions. Strategic diversification into data-center services offers an adjacent, potentially higher-margin and less commoditized revenue stream, following a path also being pursued by domestic peers. Financing for this pipeline includes a planned bilateral long-term facility via Meezan Bank, timely completion of this facility is an important near-term monitorable given the repayment profile of TWA’s existing ~PKR 10.8bln Meezan syndicate facility. Key constraints to sustainable growth include continued geopolitical/execution risk on Gulf-corridor cable projects, secular per-unit bandwidth pricing erosion common to the industry globally and sustained USD-denominated capex exposure amid PKR volatility. On balance, TWA’s growth trajectory appears sustainable provided the Company successfully manages its financing pipeline and near-term debt-repayment bunching alongside continued execution risk on its international cable projects.


Financial Risk
Working capital

Working-capital management continued to strengthen, with trade receivable days declining to 134 in CY25 (CY24: 145; CY23: 166), while trade payable days remained broadly stable at 83 (CY24: 89; CY23: 84). As a result, net working-capital days improved to 51 in CY25 from 56 in CY24 and 82 in CY23, providing some support to liquidity amid the Company’s ongoing capex-led expansion. The current ratio, however, remained below 1.0x at 0.9x in [MO1] CY25 (CY24: 0.8x; CY23: 1.2x), reflecting the capital-intensive nature of the business and reliance on longer-term funding for investment needs. While this limits the near-term liquidity cushion, the improving working-capital cycle provides some mitigation.  [MO1]This seems to be quite on higher side and does not account for the current portion of long term debts and short term loans. Plz double check.


Coverages

FCFO increased modestly to ~PKR 4,491mln in CY25 (CY24: ~PKR 4,214mln; CY23: ~PKR 3,985mln), representing 6.6% growth and trailing the 18.0% increase in revenue. Accordingly, cash conversion moderated to 28.6% in CY25 (CY24: 31.7%; CY23: 37.5%), reflecting the pressure on operating margins. Coverage metrics also weakened, with EBITDA/Finance Cost declining to 3.2x in CY25 from 9.5x in CY24 (CY23: 11.0x), while FCFO/Finance Cost moderated to 2.5x from 7.2x (CY23: 8.6x), primarily due to the significant increase in finance costs. Core debt coverage declined to 0.6x in CY25 from 1.2x in CY24 (CY23: 2.9x), indicating a more limited capacity of internally generated cash flows to cover financing costs and near-term debt maturities. This was partly driven by the increase in current maturities of long-term borrowings to PKR 3,323mln in CY25 from PKR 812mln in CY24 (+309%). Consequently, debt payback lengthened to 5.4 years (CY24: 3.6 years; CY23: 3.0 years), while liquid cover moderated to 1.3x (CY24: 2.0x; CY23: 10.3x), following the decline in cash reserves. Overall, coverage metrics indicate some tightening in the Company’s financial flexibility, primarily reflecting higher debt servicing requirements associated with the ongoing capacity expansion and SMW6-related funding needs.


Capitalization

Leverage remained broadly stable, increasing moderately to 48.1% in CY25 from 46.9% in CY24 (CY23: 49.5%), before improving to 45.5% by Mar-26. The increase in CY25 was accompanied by higher short-term borrowings of PKR 1,506mln (CY24: ~PKR 640mln; CY23: PKR 759mln), raising their share of total borrowings to 10.9% from 5.5%. Long-term debt nevertheless remained the primary source of funding at PKR 8,815mln in CY25 (CY24: ~PKR 10,166mln; CY23: ~PKR 9,559mln).

Off-balance-sheet exposure increased to 32.8% in CY25 from 27.3% in CY24 (CY23: 41.4%), largely reflecting outstanding capital commitments related to the SMW6 project and data-center investments. Capex remained elevated at PKR 3,360mln in CY25 (CY24: PKR 2,312mln; CY23: PKR 3,636mln), driven by continued SMW5/TW-1 capacity upgrades and data-center build-out. The investment program was supported in part by additional short-term (a short-term sukuk of ~PKR 1.5bln was also issued in April, 2026) and long-term funding, with net long-term borrowings increasing by ~PKR 1,134mln during CY25. Overall, capitalization remains manageable, although the elevated investment cycle and associated funding requirements continue to place some pressure on leverage and funding mix.


 
 

Aug-26

www.pacra.com


(PKR mln)


Mar-26
3M
Dec-25
12M
Dec-24
12M
Dec-23
12M
Management Audited Audited Audited
A. BALANCE SHEET
1. Non-Current Assets 31,201 31,060 26,677 22,752
2. Investments 72 0 5 14
3. Related Party Exposure 2,774 2,774 2,717 2,264
4. Current Assets 7,835 7,814 5,625 7,103
a. Inventories 1 1 1 1
b. Trade Receivables 6,874 6,416 5,106 5,455
5. Total Assets 41,881 41,647 35,023 32,134
6. Current Liabilities 8,670 8,581 6,986 6,138
a. Trade Payables 3,976 3,510 3,618 2,869
7. Borrowings 12,985 13,644 11,619 11,218
8. Related Party Exposure 154 159 4 0
9. Non-Current Liabilities 4,358 4,358 3,278 3,318
10. Net Assets 15,714 14,905 13,136 11,461
11. Shareholders' Equity 15,714 14,905 13,136 11,461
B. INCOME STATEMENT
1. Sales 4,300 15,713 13,311 10,618
a. Cost of Good Sold (2,189) (8,280) (7,076) (5,080)
2. Gross Profit 2,111 7,433 6,235 5,538
a. Operating Expenses (599) (2,107) (1,410) (1,067)
3. Operating Profit 1,512 5,325 4,825 4,471
a. Non Operating Income or (Expense) 11 (249) (711) (420)
4. Profit or (Loss) before Interest and Tax 1,523 5,076 4,114 4,050
a. Total Finance Cost (218) (2,035) (850) (656)
b. Taxation (497) (1,265) (1,023) (1,498)
6. Net Income Or (Loss) 809 1,776 2,241 1,897
C. CASH FLOW STATEMENT
a. Free Cash Flows from Operations (FCFO) 1,195 4,491 4,214 3,985
b. Net Cash from Operating Activities before Working Capital Changes 460 2,713 1,582 2,209
c. Changes in Working Capital 279 (451) 1,188 (709)
1. Net Cash provided by Operating Activities 739 2,262 2,770 1,500
2. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Investing Activities (520) (3,565) (2,679) (3,790)
3. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Financing Activities (428) 934 (368) (528)
4. Net Cash generated or (Used) during the period (210) (370) (277) (2,818)
D. RATIO ANALYSIS
1. Performance
a. Sales Growth (for the period) 9.5% 18.0% 25.4% 21.4%
b. Gross Profit Margin 49.1% 47.3% 46.8% 52.2%
c. Net Profit Margin 18.8% 11.3% 16.8% 17.9%
d. Cash Conversion Efficiency (FCFO adjusted for Working Capital/Sales) 34.3% 25.7% 40.6% 30.9%
e. Return on Equity [ Net Profit Margin * Asset Turnover * (Total Assets/Shareholders' Equity )] 21.1% 12.7% 18.2% 18.0%
2. Working Capital Management
a. Gross Working Capital (Average Days) 141 134 145 166
b. Net Working Capital (Average Days) 62 51 56 82
c. Current Ratio (Current Assets / Current Liabilities) 0.9 0.9 0.8 1.2
3. Coverages
a. EBITDA / Finance Cost 8.6 3.2 9.5 11.0
b. FCFO / Finance Cost+CMLTB+Excess STB 0.8 0.6 1.2 2.9
c. Debt Payback (Total Borrowings+Excess STB) / (FCFO-Finance Cost) 3.5 5.4 3.6 3.0
4. Capital Structure
a. Total Borrowings / (Total Borrowings+Shareholders' Equity) 45.5% 48.1% 46.9% 49.5%
b. Interest or Markup Payable (Days) 169.7 74.6 284.6 429.4
c. Entity Average Borrowing Rate 6.0% 14.4% 5.1% 4.8%

Aug-26

www.pacra.com

Aug-26

www.pacra.com

  1. Rating Team Statements
    1. Rating is just an opinion about the creditworthiness of the entity and does not constitute a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell any security of the entity rated or to buy, hold, or sell the security rated, as the case may be. (Chapter III; 14-3-(x))
    2. Conflict of Interest
      1. The Rating Team or any of their family members have no interest in this rating (Chapter III; 12-2-(j))
      2. PACRA, the analysts involved in the rating process, and members of its rating committee and their family members do not have any conflict of interest relating to the rating done by them (Chapter III; 12-2-(e) & (k))
      3. The analyst is not a substantial shareholder of the customer being rated by PACRA [Annexure F; d-(ii)]
      4. Explanation: for the purpose of the above clause, the term "family members" shall include only those family members who are dependent on the analyst and members of the rating committee.
  2. Restrictions
    1. No director, officer, or employee of PACRA communicates the information acquired by him for use for rating purposes to any other person, except where required under law to do so. (Chapter III; 10-(5))
    2. PACRA does not disclose or discuss with outside parties or make improper use of the non-public information which has come to its knowledge during a business relationship with the customer. (Chapter III; 10-7-(d))
    3. PACRA does not make proposals or recommendations regarding the activities of rated entities that could impact a credit rating of the entity subject to rating. (Chapter III; 10-7-(k))
  3. Conduct of Business
    1. PACRA fulfills its obligations in a fair, efficient, transparent, and ethical manner and renders high standards of services in performing its functions and obligations. (Chapter III; 11-A-(a))
    2. PACRA uses due care in the preparation of this Rating Report. Our information has been obtained from sources we consider to be reliable, but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. PACRA does not, in every instance, independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing this Rating Report. (Clause 11-(A)(p))
    3. PACRA prohibits its employees and analysts from soliciting money, gifts, or favors from anyone with whom PACRA conducts business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(q))
    4. PACRA ensures before the commencement of the rating process that an analyst or employee has not had a recent employment or other significant business or personal relationship with the rated entity that may cause or may be perceived as causing a conflict of interest. (Chapter III; 11-A-(r))
    5. PACRA maintains the principle of integrity in seeking rating business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(u))
    6. PACRA promptly investigates in the event of misconduct or a breach of the policies, procedures, and controls, and takes appropriate steps to rectify any weaknesses to prevent any recurrence, along with suitable punitive action against the responsible employee(s). (Chapter III; 11-B-(m))
  4. Independence & Conflict of Interest
    1. PACRA receives compensation from the entity being rated or any third party for the rating services it offers. The receipt of this compensation has no influence on PACRA’s opinions or other analytical processes. In all instances, PACRA is committed to preserving the objectivity, integrity, and independence of its ratings. Our relationship is governed by two distinct mandates: i) rating mandate - signed with the entity being rated or issuer of the debt instrument, and ii) fee mandate - signed with the payer, which can be different from the entity.
    2. PACRA does not provide consultancy/advisory services or other services to any of its customers or their associated companies and associated undertakings that are being rated or have been rated by it during the preceding three years, unless it has an adequate mechanism in place ensuring that the provision of such services does not lead to a conflict of interest situation with its rating activities. (Chapter III; 12-2-(d))
    3. PACRA discloses that no shareholder directly or indirectly holding 10% or more of the share capital of PACRA also holds directly or indirectly 10% or more of the share capital of the entity which is subject to rating or the entity which issued the instrument subject to rating by PACRA. (Chapter III; 12-2-(f))
    4. PACRA ensures that the rating assigned to an entity or instrument is not affected by the existence of a business relationship between PACRA and the entity or any other party, or the non-existence of such a relationship. (Chapter III; 12-2-(i))
    5. PACRA ensures that the analysts or any of their family members shall not buy, sell, or engage in any transaction in any security which falls in the analyst’s area of primary analytical responsibility. This clause, however, does not apply to investments in securities through collective investment schemes. (Chapter III; 12-2-(l))
    6. PACRA has established policies and procedures governing investments and trading in securities by its employees and for monitoring the same to prevent insider trading, market manipulation, or any other market abuse. (Chapter III; 11-B-(g))
  5. Monitoring and Review
    1. PACRA monitors all the outstanding ratings continuously, and any potential change therein due to any event associated with the issuer, the security arrangement, the industry, etc., is disseminated to the market immediately and in an effective manner after appropriate consultation with the entity/issuer. (Chapter III; 17-(a))
    2. PACRA reviews all the outstanding ratings periodically on an annual basis. Provided that public dissemination of annual review and in an instance of change in rating will be made. (Chapter III; 17-(b))
    3. PACRA initiates an immediate review of the outstanding rating upon becoming aware of any information that may reasonably be expected to result in downgrading of the rating. (Chapter III; 17-(c))
    4. PACRA engages with the issuer and the debt securities trustee to remain updated on all information pertaining to the rating of the entity/instrument. (Chapter III; 17-(d))
  6. Probability of Default
    1. PACRA’s Rating Scale reflects the expectation of credit risk. The highest rating has the lowest relative likelihood of default (i.e., probability). PACRA’s transition studies capture the historical performance behavior of a specific rating notch. Transition behavior of the assigned rating can be obtained from PACRA’s Transition Study available at our website. (www.pacra.com) However, the actual transition of rating may not follow the pattern observed in the past. (Chapter III; 14-3(f)(vii))
  7. Proprietary Information
    1. All information contained herein is considered proprietary by PACRA. Hence, none of the information in this document can be copied or otherwise reproduced, stored, or disseminated in whole or in part in any form or by any means whatsoever by any person without PACRA’s prior written consent.

Aug-26

www.pacra.com