Rating History
Dissemination Date Long-Term Rating Short-Term Rating Outlook Action Rating Watch
18-Sep-26 AA A1+ Stable Maintain -
19-Sep-25 AA A1+ Stable Maintain -
19-Sep-24 AA A1+ Stable Upgrade -
19-Sep-23 AA- A1 Stable Maintain -
24-Sep-22 AA- A1 Stable Maintain -
About the Entity

SIL is a public listed entity, incorporated in 1957. The Company operates under the brand name of ‘Servis’ across the country. The Group is one of the largest manufacturers of tyres & tubes, and footwear, besides being a prominent export player in the country. The majority stake vests with Directors and the sponsoring family, which collectively holds ~50.47% of shareholding. The Board comprises nine members, with 3 independent directors, 1 executive director and 5 non-executive directors. Mr. Arif Saeed is the CEO of the Company.

Rating Rationale

Service Industries Limited (‘SIL’ or ‘the Company’) sits at the apex of the Service Group as its ultimate holding company, while also functioning as an operating entity through its footwear manufacturing facility in Gujrat. The corporate structure comprises four wholly-owned subsidiaries, Service Tyres (Pvt.) Ltd (STPL) and Service Retail (Pvt.) Ltd (SRPL), SIL Gulf FZE and Service Industries Capital (Private) Limited (SICPL). STPL house the tyre/tube while SRPL deals footwear-retail operations following a structured demerger. SIL also have investment in Service Global Footwear Ltd (SGFL) and Service Long March Tyres Limited (SLM). The Group’s corporatization journey gained further momentum with SLM’s transition to a PSX-listed entity, strengthening transparency and governance, while SIL’s multi-entity investment portfolio continues to provide a broader and more resilient business base. The assigned ratings reflect the Group’s consistently strengthening position in the domestic tyre market, supported by a strategy of identifying market gaps and developing local manufacturing capabilities in segments historically reliant on imports. SLM, already the sole domestic manufacturer of Truck and Bus Radial (TBR) tyres, is now progressing a dedicated Passenger Car Radial (PCR) facility, with IPO proceeds earmarked for the project. This follows the Group’s successful entry into TBR and extends its import-substitution strategy into another major tyre category, with potential to deepen its domestic market position as local production scales up. STPL separately retains a dominant share of the two- and three-wheeler and light commercial vehicle bias tyre categories, underpinning the Group’s overall leadership across the tyre value chain. This is complemented by a continued build-out of the Group’s export portfolio, with SLM, STPL and SGFL together advancing exports to ~30% of consolidated sales in CY25, broadening the revenue base while providing a partial hedge against the Group’s import-linked raw material cost base. In footwear, on the domestic retail side, SIL's 286-outlet network has plateaued, with periodic openings offset by closures, as the Company focuses on product-mix diversification and a growing e-commerce channel, while SGFL, the Group’s export-oriented manufacturing arm, continues to lead Pakistan’s leather footwear export market. A sound governance framework and prudent risk management practices at Group level continue to underpin the ratings. Against a somewhat less accommodative macroeconomic backdrop in 2026, marked by the policy rate rising to 11.5% and inflation approaching 11%, SIL’s consolidated revenue nonetheless grew ~18.7% in CY25 to PKR 148.4bln (CY24: PKR 125.0bln), with net margins improving materially on lower borrowing costs even as gross and operating margins moderated on raw material cost pressures. The ratings incorporate SIL’s improving financial risk profile, adequate working capital management and strengthening coverages. The capital structure remains leveraged, reflecting continued use of concessionary, TERF-linked financing for expansion, including SLM’s planned capacity build-out. Going forward, the sponsors remain committed to enhancing revenue through import substitution and broader export opportunities, while investing in capacity expansion and export-market development to sustain long-term growth.
.

Key Rating Drivers

The ratings are dependent on the sustenance of the Group’s leading position in the tyre and footwear markets, successful execution and ramp-up of SLM’s PCR capacity without a material build-up in consolidated leverage, and continued growth in the export portfolio. Profitability in line with business expansion, prudent working capital management, and maintenance of coverages shall remain imperative, along with sustained dividend flow from the Group’s strategic investments.

Profile
Legal Structure

Service Industries Limited ('SIL' or 'the Company') was incorporated in 1957 under the Companies Act, 1913 (now the Companies Act, 2017), converted into a public limited company on September 23, 1959, and listed on the Pakistan Stock Exchange (PSX) in June 1970. As of Aug'26, the Company's free float stood at ~50.0% of total shares. SIL occupies the position of the ultimate holding and operating platform within the Service Group, maintaining strategic investments , mainly in subsidiary entities across the tyre and footwear segments.


Background

SIL traces its origins to the late 1930s in Lahore, where its founders, Ch. Muhammad Saeed, Ch. Nazar Muhammad and Ch. Mohammad Husain, began manufacturing and supplying mosquito nets, minor steel products and leather chappals, subsequently expanding into travel bags, handbags and holdalls made of canvas and leather. The Company was formally incorporated as a private limited entity in 1957. In 1954, SIL installed a shoe manufacturing plant in the Gulberg industrial area of Lahore, commencing large-scale footwear production, alongside the establishment of its first retail outlet on Mall Road, later rebranded as a dedicated Servis store. Expansion into Gujrat saw the development of one of Punjab's largest industrial complexes, encompassing leather and canvas footwear, canvas fabric, and eventually bicycle tyres and tubes. A significant milestone was the formation of Service Long March Tyres Limited, a joint venture with a Chinese technology partner, positioning SIL as the only local manufacturer of Truck and Bus Radial (TBR) tyres. More recently, the Group executed a structured demerger, transferring its tyre and tube operations to STPL and its retail footwear business to SRPL, reinforcing SIL's role as the Group's strategic holding platform while enabling specialized management oversight of each business line.


Operations

SIL directly manages its footwear manufacturing facility in Gujrat, while its tyre/tube, retail and export operations are conducted through subsidiaries and the SLM joint venture. At the consolidated Group level, installed footwear capacity stands at ~4.6mln pairs under Strobel construction and ~3.6mln pairs under lasted construction, supported by a nationwide retail network of 286 outlets operated through SRPL. In the tyre segment, STPL maintains an annual installed capacity of ~23mln tyres and 57mln tubes, complemented by a spare-parts division (chains and sprockets); SLM's TBR capacity has been expanded from 1.3mln to 2mln with a dedicated Passenger Car Radial (PCR) facility under development (commercial operations targeted January 2028; initial capacity of 2mln tyres). Capacity utilization as of CY25 stood at ~75% in footwear, ~75% in tyres and ~83% in tubes. The Group's supply chain draws on natural rubber, synthetic rubber, carbon black, steel cord, nylon fabric and leather, procured through a mix of domestic and import channels.


Ownership
Ownership Structure

The sponsoring family remains the principal shareholder and ultimate decision-making authority of SIL. As per the shareholding pattern as of Aug’26, Directors, the CEO and the sponsoring families collectively held ~50.47%, associated companies/undertakings/related parties ~5.27%, NIT & ICP ~10.05%, and the general public (local and foreign) ~34.21%, with the residual spread across banks, DFIs, insurance companies, modarabas and mutual funds. As of Aug'26, the Company's top-five shareholders were:




Key individual sponsor holdings are led by Mr. Hassan Javed (~19.29%), followed by Mr. Omer Saeed and Mr. Arif Saeed (~10.14% each), Ms. Shereen Hassan (~0.85%) and Ms. Fatima Saeed (~0.79%). Notably, Mr. Shahid Malik, a recently inducted non-executive director, is a >5% shareholder in his individual capacity, though not a member of the sponsoring family or an executive of the Company.


Stability

The ownership structure of SIL is considered stable, anchored by the sponsoring family’s significant combined shareholding and continuous, active leadership across both the holding company and its subsidiaries. With a corporate history spanning over seven decades, SIL has maintained consistent ownership without material disputes or involuntary ownership transitions. A clear succession framework within the founding family, combined with the Group's expanding institutional profile, including SLM’s PSX listing, which introduces a broader external shareholder base at the subsidiary level, further reinforces structural ownership stability and strategic continuity.


Business Acumen

The sponsors of SIL demonstrate substantive business acumen, anchored by decades of hands-on engagement across the footwear and tyre sectors. Strategic foresight is evidenced by the formation of the SLM joint venture with a Chinese technology partner, the establishment of SGFL for export-oriented footwear manufacturing, the structured demerger that created specialized management platforms for each business vertical, and, most recently, the successful execution of SLM's oversubscribed PSX listing, which both crystallized value and broadened the Group's access to capital markets to fund its Passenger Car Radial expansion. The expansion of the Servis brand into a household name, alongside the Group's growing presence across international markets, reflects the sponsors' capacity to build both brand equity and operational scale.


Financial Strength

SIL's consolidated asset base stood at ~PKR 136.8bln as of Dec'25 (Dec'24: ~PKR 110.6bln), with consolidated shareholders' equity of ~PKR 40.9bln (Dec'24: ~PKR 26.0bln), reflecting meaningful capital accretion during the year. As of Mar'26, consolidated assets moderated to ~PKR 122.4bln, largely reflecting the redemption of short-term mutual fund placements and an active paydown of short-term borrowings, while equity rose further to ~PKR 45.9bln. Beyond the consolidated balance sheet, the Group holds substantial strategic investments in SLM and SGFL, which, following SLM’s PSX listing, now carry an observable market value that provides additional financial depth and flexibility beyond book value.


Governance
Board Structure

The Board of Directors of SIL comprises nine members, reflecting a balanced mix of three independent directors, one executive director, and five non-executive directors, with the Chairman and CEO roles held by separate individuals. As of Aug'26, the Board comprises:




The Board underwent a refresh during the review period, with Mr. Shahid Malik and Mr. Muhammad Asad inducted as non-executive directors in place of the previous cohort, broadening the Board's capital-markets, pharmaceutical/FMCG and asset-management expertise alongside its existing base in regulatory affairs, industrial operations and financial leadership.



Members’ Profile

The Board is chaired by Mr. Hassan Javed, who has also served as CEO of Service Global Footwear, and has chaired the Pakistan Footwear Manufacturers Association and GESCO. Mr. Arif Saeed (CEO) has served as Chairman of Service Global Footwear, the Engineering Development Board, and founding Chairman of major public-sector power companies, in addition to leading APTMA and the Lahore Stock Exchange. Mr. Omar Saeed, previously CEO of SIL (2011–2018), currently serves as CEO of Service Long March Tyres and Servis Foundation, and sits on the boards of Nestlé Pakistan, Systems Limited and Service Global Footwear, also he is the Chairman of Export Development Fund (EDF). Mr. Ahsan Bashir has served as CEO of Suraj Cotton Mills since 1992 and has chaired APTMA. Mr. Muhammad Naeem Khan has served as CEO/MD of Atlas Asset Management, Atlas Investment Bank and Atlas Capital Markets, and currently sits on the boards of Atlas Power and Raaziq International. Mr. Shahid Malik is Group Managing Director of Hilton Pharma (Pvt.) Limited and CEO of Hinucon (Pvt.) Limited, has driven that Group's diversification and international expansion, sits on the boards of Packages Limited and Thal Limited, and holds a degree in Economics & Finance from NYU Stern with executive education from INSEAD, London Business School and IMD. Mr. Muhammad Asad joined National Investment Trust Limited (NITL) as Managing Director in July 2026 for a three-year term, having previously served for 25 years at Al Meezan Investment Management (latterly as Chief Investment Officer, managing funds exceeding ~PKR 700bln), and holds an MBA from IBA, Karachi.


Board Effectiveness

The Board meets regularly with structured agendas to steer strategic direction and monitor management performance, with comprehensive minutes maintained. Two formal subcommittees support oversight: the Audit Committee and the HR & Remuneration Committee, each comprising three members. The Audit Committee oversees financial reporting integrity, internal controls and related-party transactions, while the HR & Remuneration Committee aligns management compensation with performance objectives; the Board's oversight is further reinforced through quarterly reviews of the control environment and internal audit findings.


Financial Transparency

SIL's external audit is conducted by M/s Riaz Ahmad & Co., Chartered Accountants, a category 'A' firm on the SBP panel of auditors. The auditors expressed an unqualified opinion on the standalone financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2025, reflecting compliance with applicable reporting standards and sound financial disclosure practices.


Management
Organizational Structure

SIL is structured into multiple operational entities, each overseen by specialized management teams tailored to their respective functions. Clear reporting lines, defined roles, and accountability mechanisms ensure operational efficiency and effective oversight. The Group also benefits from the stability of having all key positions filled, with senior management experienced in leading both domestic operations and international ventures. This structure reflects a professionalized governance model that enables SIL to balance its role as a holding company with its operating responsibilities.


Management Team

The management team is led by Mr. Arif Saeed, CEO, with 29 years of overall experience. He is supported by Mr. Babar Ali Khan, Chief Financial Officer (Chartered Accountant, 21 years' experience). Other senior team members include specialists in finance, technical operations, human resources, sales, and marketing, many of whom have long tenures with SIL, ensuring both continuity and depth of expertise. The mix of family leadership and professional managers provides a well-rounded foundation for strategic execution.


Effectiveness

Management has demonstrated consistent execution of strategic priorities, including completion of SLM's second manufacturing phase, its subsequent PSX listing, and the operationalization of STPL and SRPL following the demerger. In the retail segment, management is actively rebalancing the product mix: a cosmetics category and a standalone apparel retail concept, and e-commerce has emerged as a growing, comparatively higher-margin channel. The Group Executive Committee, Business Head Committee and Core Services Committee collectively bridge interdepartmental gaps and align operational priorities with strategic objectives, with minutes properly recorded and reviewed, reflecting a culture of structured accountability.


MIS

SIL has fully deployed an Enterprise Resource Planning system through Oracle E-Business Suite (EBS) Release 12, integrating financing, manufacturing and support functions on a centralized data platform, enabling process standardization, real-time information flow and informed, timely decision-making at both Group and subsidiary level.


Control Environment

SIL maintains a sound internal control framework supported by clearly defined lines of responsibility, authorization and accountability. A dedicated internal audit function, staffed with qualified professionals, evaluates internal controls and reports to the Board's Audit Committee, which reviews the adequacy of the control environment on a quarterly basis, reinforced by robust technological infrastructure across manufacturing and support functions.


Business Risk
Industry Dynamics

Pakistan's tyre and footwear industries together constitute a significant component of the manufacturing sector, closely linked to consumer spending, mobility infrastructure and export competitiveness. In the tyre segment, the domestic market was estimated at ~USD 2.09bln in 2025, projected to grow to ~USD 2.71bln by 2030 (~5.32% CAGR); volumetrically, the market recorded ~26.0mln units in 2025, with projections indicating growth toward ~37.0mln units by 2034. The replacement market dominates demand, typically accounting for 80–90% of total offtake, providing structural demand stability relative to purely OEM-dependent markets; the two/three-wheeler segment remains the single largest vehicle category on affordability and urban-mobility grounds. Demand from the commercial vehicle segment continues to expand, driven by CPEC-linked freight-corridor growth and gradual normalization of light-vehicle production; within the TBR category specifically, demand is supported by regulatory localization policy and import substitution. The agricultural tyre segment saw near-term softness, with tractor sales in FY25 declining ~37% YoY to ~29,000 units (FY24: ~45,911 units), reflecting rural income and mechanization-uptake pressures, though recovery is expected to track agricultural commodity prices and government support. On the competitive landscape, domestic manufacturers General Tyre and Rubber Company (GTYR) and Panther Tyres compete alongside SIL's tyre platforms, while grey-market imports, estimated by management at ~20–25% of the domestic replacement market (having displaced a historical ~70% share held by legacy international brands), continue to pose structural competition; industry replacement capacity is estimated at ~6.5mln tyres, with GTR and Armstrong each holding ~1.5mln units of capacity, and management expects further consolidation around a smaller set of established players (GTR, Armstrong, Long March) as vehicle categories, including the emerging EV segment, evolve. Key sector-wide credit risks include exposure to volatile petrochemical-derived raw material prices (synthetic rubber, carbon black), currency depreciation risk on import-dependent inputs, macro/auto-cycle cyclicality, persistent grey-market competition, and technology-obsolescence risk as radial adoption accelerates relative to bias tyres. In footwear, Pakistan's industry employs over one million people, with the bulk of domestic demand met by the cottage industry and the organized segment served by a small number of large-scale players (BATA, Servis, STYLO, NDURE, BORJAN). On the export side, national footwear exports reached ~USD 176.5mln in FY25 (+8.9% YoY, reversing FY24's ~9.2% decline). Momentum has continued into FY26: exports for the first eight months (Jul'25–Feb'26) reached ~USD 131.75mln, up ~4.23% YoY, with leather footwear, which continues to dominate export revenue, down a modest ~1.5% while 'other footwear' categories expanded ~29.7%, indicating a broadening export product mix; February 2026 alone recorded ~8.9% YoY growth. Key sector credit risks include dependence on imported leather and synthetic materials (creating FX exposure), intense informal-sector price competition, sensitivity to European and US demand conditions, export-market compliance requirements around sustainability and ethical sourcing, and labor-cost inflation in a labor-intensive industry. Across both sectors, the macroeconomic backdrop has turned somewhat less accommodative through 2026: after easing to a low of ~10.5% earlier in the year, the State Bank of Pakistan's policy rate was raised back to 11.5% by mid-2026 and held through its July meeting, with headline inflation running in the ~11% range, still well above the SBP's 5–7% medium-term target, which, together with currency volatility, remains a structural challenge for both import-dependent manufacturing and consumer-facing demand. ESG and climate-related considerations are gaining traction, particularly for export-oriented manufacturers subject to buyer sustainability requirements in developed markets.


Relative Position

The Service Group occupies a leadership position across Pakistan's tyre, tube and footwear sectors. STPL holds a dominant share of the two/three-wheeler, LCV (bias) and agricultural tyre categories, while SLM is the sole domestic manufacturer of TBR tyres, a structurally unique position reinforced by import-substitution policy and now underpinned by capital-market validation following its PSX listing in June 2026. SLM's TBR capacity has been expanded from 1.3mln to 2mln, and IPO proceeds are earmarked for a new Passenger Car Radial (PCR) facility, a segment historically reliant on imports, targeting commercial operations from January 2028, a meaningful extension of the Group’s import-substitution franchise. In footwear, SRPL and the Servis brand rank among the top five organized retail players. On exports, SGFL leads Pakistan's leather footwear export market. Within the domestic tyre market (including SLM and GTR), SLM holds the largest share, followed by STPL, Panther, General, Diamond, and Ghauri. On exports, SLM leads, followed by STPL. The Group's installed capacity, ~24.5mln tyres, 57mln tubes and ~8.2mln pairs of footwear across construction methods, provides meaningful scale advantages over most domestic peers, reinforced by seven decades of Servis brand equity, a 286-outlet nationwide retail network.


Revenues

Consolidated revenue for the year ended Dec'25 grew ~18.7% to PKR 148.4bln (CY24: PKR 125.0bln), moderating from ~29.5% growth recorded in CY24, supported by higher tyre and tube volumes and improved price realization. Revenue composition has shifted materially toward the tyre and tube segment, which contributed ~71% of consolidated turnover in CY25, against ~26% for footwear and ~3% for spare parts and technical products. This concentration deepened further in 1QCY26: consolidated revenue rose ~30% YoY to PKR 42.2bln, driven by the tyre segment (+45% YoY to PKR 31.4bln), whose share of consolidated topline rose further to ~74% (1QCY25: ~67%), while footwear was broadly flat (-1% YoY to PKR 9.8bln). The revenue base retains adequate product and geographic diversification via SLM, STPL and SGFL's export channels, but the rising and now dominant weight of the tyre segment, and within it, SLM specifically, introduces a growing degree of segment concentration risk, one that is partially mitigated by the structural stability of replacement-driven tyre demand and by SLM's own diversification into the PCR category.


Margins

For CY25, gross margin moderated to 23.6% (CY24: 24.7%), reflecting evolving raw material cost dynamics, natural rubber, synthetic rubber, carbon black, steel cord and leather represent the largest components of cost of sales and are sourced through a mix of domestic and import channels, creating exposure to global commodity cycles and currency movements. Operating margin eased to 13.1% (CY24: 14.4%) on the cost of expanded operations and network growth, while net profit margin improved materially to 10.2% (CY24: 6.3%), aided by a sharp decline in the average borrowing rate to 7.8% (CY24: 12.1%) and a net positive taxation impact of PKR 1.0bln (CY24: a charge of PKR 3.4bln). Momentum carried into 1QCY26, with gross margin expanding to 27.1% and net margin to 12.0% as the average borrowing rate fell further to 5.8%.


Sustainability

The Group’s long-term sustainability rests on several structural pillars. In the tyre segment, SLM's position as the sole domestic TBR manufacturer provides a durable competitive moat, now reinforced by direct capital-market access following its PSX listing: IPO proceeds are earmarked for a dedicated Passenger Car Radial facility (commercial operations targeted January 2028), extending the Group’s import-substitution franchise into a segment historically reliant on imports, and reducing SLM's reliance on Group-level financial support to fund this expansion. In footwear, SRPL's 286-outlet network has plateaued, periodic openings broadly offsetting closures, prompting management to pursue a more active mix-management strategy and scaling e-commerce as a newer, comparatively higher-margin channel, while SGFL sustains its leadership of Pakistan's leather footwear export market. ESG exposure is an increasingly material consideration for both segments given buyer-driven sustainability and ethical-sourcing requirements in European and US export markets. The Group's capital expenditure program, encompassing SLM's PCR project and continued maintenance capex across large-scale manufacturing facilities, is funded through a combination of concessionary (including TERF-linked) financing, IPO proceeds at the SLM level, and internal cash generation. The Group's track record of consistent revenue and profit growth through macroeconomically challenging phases of high inflation and elevated interest rates continues to demonstrate execution resilience.


Financial Risk
Working capital

Gross working capital days stood at 101 days for both Dec'25 and Dec'24, indicating a stable inventory and receivables cycle; net working capital days were similarly stable at 80 days (CY24: 79 days). The current ratio as of Dec'25 was 3.5x, unchanged from Dec'24. Trade receivables rose to PKR 17.0bln as of Dec'25 (Dec'24: PKR 14.1bln) and inventories to PKR 26.5bln (Dec'24: PKR 24.5bln), consistent with higher sales volumes, while trade payables were broadly stable at PKR 8.7bln (Dec'24: PKR 8.5bln). Working capital is funded through a combination of internal cash flows and short-term borrowings. As of Mar'26, gross and net working capital days moderated to 97 and 76 days respectively, the current ratio stood at 3.2x, trade receivables rose to PKR 23.0bln, inventories eased to PKR 22.9bln, and trade payables rose to PKR 10.2bln.


Coverages

For CY25, Net cashflow from operating activities before working capital changes was PKR 15.5bln (CY24: PKR 12.8bln); after working capital movements (a net absorption of PKR 2.1bln in CY25 versus PKR 6.6bln in CY24), net operating cash flow rose to PKR 13.4bln (CY24: PKR 6.2bln), reflecting both higher profitability and a less adverse working-capital swing. The EBITDA-to-finance-cost ratio improved to 4.6x in CY25 (CY24: 3.1x) on the back of lower total finance cost; the core coverage ratio improved to 2.0x (CY24: 1.7x); and the debt payback ratio improved to 1.5x (CY24: 2.0x), indicating a strengthened capacity to retire debt from operating cash flows. Coverage metrics improved further in 1QCY26: the EBITDA-to-finance-cost ratio reached 8.6x, the core coverage ratio strengthened to 3.5x, and the debt payback ratio improved to 0.9x, driven by the sharply reduced average borrowing rate and sustained operating cash generation.


Capitalization

Total borrowings rose to PKR 78.2bln as of Dec'25 (Dec'24: PKR 66.6bln), an increase of ~PKR 11.6bln; however, this was more than offset by growth in shareholders' equity to PKR 40.9bln (Dec'24: PKR 26.0bln), driven by retained earnings and profitability. Consequently, the leveraging ratio improved to 65.6% as of Dec'25 from 71.9% at Dec'24. The deleveraging trend strengthened further in 1QCY26: total borrowings declined ~29% to PKR 55.7bln (largely reflecting a paydown of short-term financing), while equity rose further to PKR 45.9bln, bringing the leveraging ratio down to 54.8%, the lowest level across the Dec'23–Mar'26 analytical window. The average borrowing rate fell to 5.8% in 1QCY26 (CY25: 7.8%), though the SBP's policy rate has since been raised back to 11.5% by Aug'26 (from a low of ~10.5% earlier in the year), an emerging headwind to financing costs for the remainder of CY26 despite the Company's preferential banking terms. Going forward, leverage remains sensitive to the Group’s expansion plans, including the incorporation of Service Tyres International (Pvt.) Limited under Service Tyres (Pvt.) Limited and, particularly, SLM’s PCR capacity build-out and broader capex program. However, pressure on SIL’s consolidated balance sheet is partly mitigated by SLM’s PSX IPO proceeds, which are expected to fund a portion of the planned capex at the subsidiary level, alongside continued access to TERF-linked concessionary financing, reducing reliance on conventional short-term debt. Nevertheless, the scale and pace of the planned investments could result in a gradual increase in debt levels over the medium term.


 
 

Sep-26

www.pacra.com


(PKR mln)


Mar-26
3M
Dec-25
12M
Dec-24
12M
Dec-23
12M
Management Audited Audited Audited
A. BALANCE SHEET
1. Non-Current Assets 55,224 55,340 47,621 41,107
2. Investments 3,014 21,480 9,397 945
3. Related Party Exposure 768 747 681 647
4. Current Assets 63,393 59,241 52,919 43,134
a. Inventories 22,955 26,473 24,524 21,052
b. Trade Receivables 22,975 16,969 14,071 9,717
5. Total Assets 122,399 136,808 110,619 85,833
6. Current Liabilities 19,870 16,921 15,307 13,787
a. Trade Payables 10,243 8,740 8,473 6,698
7. Borrowings 55,737 78,151 66,591 52,189
8. Related Party Exposure 0 0 0 0
9. Non-Current Liabilities 849 829 2,703 886
10. Net Assets 45,943 40,906 26,018 18,970
11. Shareholders' Equity 45,943 40,906 26,018 18,970
B. INCOME STATEMENT
1. Sales 42,238 148,449 125,014 96,521
a. Cost of Good Sold (30,809) (113,393) (94,134) (74,670)
2. Gross Profit 11,428 35,057 30,880 21,850
a. Operating Expenses (4,233) (15,540) (12,807) (9,308)
3. Operating Profit 7,195 19,516 18,073 12,543
a. Non Operating Income or (Expense) (214) 102 461 720
4. Profit or (Loss) before Interest and Tax 6,981 19,619 18,534 13,263
a. Total Finance Cost (992) (5,506) (7,291) (7,547)
b. Taxation (940) 1,003 (3,407) (1,404)
6. Net Income Or (Loss) 5,049 15,115 7,836 4,312
C. CASH FLOW STATEMENT
a. Free Cash Flows from Operations (FCFO) 7,535 20,771 20,119 14,554
b. Net Cash from Operating Activities before Working Capital Changes 6,911 15,496 12,823 7,775
c. Changes in Working Capital (2,422) (2,078) (6,600) (2,363)
1. Net Cash provided by Operating Activities 4,488 13,418 6,223 5,412
2. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Investing Activities 17,132 (21,020) (17,041) (6,533)
3. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Financing Activities (22,540) 9,369 11,938 4,712
4. Net Cash generated or (Used) during the period (920) 1,768 1,120 3,590
D. RATIO ANALYSIS
1. Performance
a. Sales Growth (for the period) 13.8% 18.7% 29.5% 56.5%
b. Gross Profit Margin 27.1% 23.6% 24.7% 22.6%
c. Net Profit Margin 12.0% 10.2% 6.3% 4.5%
d. Cash Conversion Efficiency (FCFO adjusted for Working Capital/Sales) 12.1% 12.6% 10.8% 12.6%
e. Return on Equity [ Net Profit Margin * Asset Turnover * (Total Assets/Shareholders' Equity )] 46.5% 45.2% 34.8% 25.2%
2. Working Capital Management
a. Gross Working Capital (Average Days) 97 101 101 111
b. Net Working Capital (Average Days) 76 80 79 87
c. Current Ratio (Current Assets / Current Liabilities) 3.2 3.5 3.5 3.1
3. Coverages
a. EBITDA / Finance Cost 8.6 4.6 3.1 2.2
b. FCFO / Finance Cost+CMLTB+Excess STB 3.5 2.0 1.7 1.3
c. Debt Payback (Total Borrowings+Excess STB) / (FCFO-Finance Cost) 0.9 1.5 2.0 3.6
4. Capital Structure
a. Total Borrowings / (Total Borrowings+Shareholders' Equity) 54.8% 65.6% 71.9% 73.3%
b. Interest or Markup Payable (Days) 62.1 35.4 40.7 68.2
c. Entity Average Borrowing Rate 5.8% 7.8% 12.1% 15.0%

Sep-26

www.pacra.com

Sep-26

www.pacra.com

  1. Rating Team Statements
    1. Rating is just an opinion about the creditworthiness of the entity and does not constitute a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell any security of the entity rated or to buy, hold, or sell the security rated, as the case may be. (Chapter III; 14-3-(x))
    2. Conflict of Interest
      1. The Rating Team or any of their family members have no interest in this rating (Chapter III; 12-2-(j))
      2. PACRA, the analysts involved in the rating process, and members of its rating committee and their family members do not have any conflict of interest relating to the rating done by them (Chapter III; 12-2-(e) & (k))
      3. The analyst is not a substantial shareholder of the customer being rated by PACRA [Annexure F; d-(ii)]
      4. Explanation: for the purpose of the above clause, the term "family members" shall include only those family members who are dependent on the analyst and members of the rating committee.
  2. Restrictions
    1. No director, officer, or employee of PACRA communicates the information acquired by him for use for rating purposes to any other person, except where required under law to do so. (Chapter III; 10-(5))
    2. PACRA does not disclose or discuss with outside parties or make improper use of the non-public information which has come to its knowledge during a business relationship with the customer. (Chapter III; 10-7-(d))
    3. PACRA does not make proposals or recommendations regarding the activities of rated entities that could impact a credit rating of the entity subject to rating. (Chapter III; 10-7-(k))
  3. Conduct of Business
    1. PACRA fulfills its obligations in a fair, efficient, transparent, and ethical manner and renders high standards of services in performing its functions and obligations. (Chapter III; 11-A-(a))
    2. PACRA uses due care in the preparation of this Rating Report. Our information has been obtained from sources we consider to be reliable, but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. PACRA does not, in every instance, independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing this Rating Report. (Clause 11-(A)(p))
    3. PACRA prohibits its employees and analysts from soliciting money, gifts, or favors from anyone with whom PACRA conducts business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(q))
    4. PACRA ensures before the commencement of the rating process that an analyst or employee has not had a recent employment or other significant business or personal relationship with the rated entity that may cause or may be perceived as causing a conflict of interest. (Chapter III; 11-A-(r))
    5. PACRA maintains the principle of integrity in seeking rating business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(u))
    6. PACRA promptly investigates in the event of misconduct or a breach of the policies, procedures, and controls, and takes appropriate steps to rectify any weaknesses to prevent any recurrence, along with suitable punitive action against the responsible employee(s). (Chapter III; 11-B-(m))
  4. Independence & Conflict of Interest
    1. PACRA receives compensation from the entity being rated or any third party for the rating services it offers. The receipt of this compensation has no influence on PACRA’s opinions or other analytical processes. In all instances, PACRA is committed to preserving the objectivity, integrity, and independence of its ratings. Our relationship is governed by two distinct mandates: i) rating mandate - signed with the entity being rated or issuer of the debt instrument, and ii) fee mandate - signed with the payer, which can be different from the entity.
    2. PACRA does not provide consultancy/advisory services or other services to any of its customers or their associated companies and associated undertakings that are being rated or have been rated by it during the preceding three years, unless it has an adequate mechanism in place ensuring that the provision of such services does not lead to a conflict of interest situation with its rating activities. (Chapter III; 12-2-(d))
    3. PACRA discloses that no shareholder directly or indirectly holding 10% or more of the share capital of PACRA also holds directly or indirectly 10% or more of the share capital of the entity which is subject to rating or the entity which issued the instrument subject to rating by PACRA. (Chapter III; 12-2-(f))
    4. PACRA ensures that the rating assigned to an entity or instrument is not affected by the existence of a business relationship between PACRA and the entity or any other party, or the non-existence of such a relationship. (Chapter III; 12-2-(i))
    5. PACRA ensures that the analysts or any of their family members shall not buy, sell, or engage in any transaction in any security which falls in the analyst’s area of primary analytical responsibility. This clause, however, does not apply to investments in securities through collective investment schemes. (Chapter III; 12-2-(l))
    6. PACRA has established policies and procedures governing investments and trading in securities by its employees and for monitoring the same to prevent insider trading, market manipulation, or any other market abuse. (Chapter III; 11-B-(g))
  5. Monitoring and Review
    1. PACRA monitors all the outstanding ratings continuously, and any potential change therein due to any event associated with the issuer, the security arrangement, the industry, etc., is disseminated to the market immediately and in an effective manner after appropriate consultation with the entity/issuer. (Chapter III; 17-(a))
    2. PACRA reviews all the outstanding ratings periodically on an annual basis. Provided that public dissemination of annual review and in an instance of change in rating will be made. (Chapter III; 17-(b))
    3. PACRA initiates an immediate review of the outstanding rating upon becoming aware of any information that may reasonably be expected to result in downgrading of the rating. (Chapter III; 17-(c))
    4. PACRA engages with the issuer and the debt securities trustee to remain updated on all information pertaining to the rating of the entity/instrument. (Chapter III; 17-(d))
  6. Probability of Default
    1. PACRA’s Rating Scale reflects the expectation of credit risk. The highest rating has the lowest relative likelihood of default (i.e., probability). PACRA’s transition studies capture the historical performance behavior of a specific rating notch. Transition behavior of the assigned rating can be obtained from PACRA’s Transition Study available at our website. (www.pacra.com) However, the actual transition of rating may not follow the pattern observed in the past. (Chapter III; 14-3(f)(vii))
  7. Proprietary Information
    1. All information contained herein is considered proprietary by PACRA. Hence, none of the information in this document can be copied or otherwise reproduced, stored, or disseminated in whole or in part in any form or by any means whatsoever by any person without PACRA’s prior written consent.

Sep-26

www.pacra.com