Rating History
Dissemination Date Long-Term Rating Short-Term Rating Outlook Action Rating Watch
07-Aug-26 A- A2 Stable Maintain -
07-Aug-25 A- A2 Stable Maintain -
07-Aug-24 A- A2 Stable Initial -
About the Entity

Sapphire Dairies (Pvt.) Limited was incorporated on January 31, 2008, and is engaged in dairy farming and the production and processing of milk and dairy products. The Company is a subsidiary of Diamond Fabrics Limited (53.755%), with the remaining shareholding held by other Sapphire Group companies. The Board is chaired by Mr. Mian Mohammad Abdullah, founder of the Sapphire Group, while the Company's operations are managed by CEO Mr. Amer Abdullah and an experienced management team.

Rating Rationale

Sapphire Dairies (Pvt.) Limited ("Sapphire Dairies" or "the Company") is one of Pakistan's leading corporate dairy farming enterprises, principally engaged in dairy farming and the production, processing, and sale of fresh milk and value-added dairy products. The Company operates a vertically integrated farm-to-pack business model from its production facility located on Manga Raiwind Road, District Kasur, encompassing dairy farming, milk processing, packaging, and distribution. Sapphire Dairies is a wholly owned subsidiary of the Sapphire Group, one of Pakistan's leading business conglomerates with diversified interests across textiles, energy, real estate, and other sectors. Fresh milk sales continue to constitute the core revenue stream, with Nestlé Pakistan Limited remaining the Company's primary customer under a long-standing commercial relationship. The Company has also diversified its product portfolio through value-added dairy products marketed under the Rivayat, Frutru, and Karak brands, while expanding into cow fattening for meat exports.
The Company maintains a herd of approximately 4,500 imported Holstein-Friesian cattle sourced from Australia and the Netherlands, supported by modern livestock management practices. Operations comprise climate-controlled housing, customized feeding systems, advanced milking parlors, milk chilling infrastructure, and in-house veterinary services. Herd productivity is supported through scientifically formulated nutrient-enriched feed and continuous health monitoring by specialized veterinary professionals. These initiatives contribute to improved milk yields, animal health, and operational efficiency. Furthermore, the Company has expanded its export footprint to the Gulf region, China, the United States, and Singapore, supporting product diversification and broadening revenue streams.
During 9MFY26, the Company generated revenue of approximately PKR 3.7bln (9MFY25: PKR 3.5bln), reflecting moderate topline growth supported by higher sales volumes and continued demand from existing customers. However, gross profit margins contracted to 6.6% (9MFY25: 8.7%), primarily due to elevated feed and other input costs amid geopolitical uncertainties and supply chain disruptions. Consequently, profitability remained under pressure despite revenue growth. Capital expenditure undertaken during the period primarily related to the development of cow-fattening sheds, feed processing facilities, and associated farm infrastructure aimed at supporting future operational expansion. Short-term borrowings increased by approximately 9.7%, mainly to finance the import of replacement heifers, procurement of feed-related raw materials, and incremental working capital requirements.
Going forward, the Company intends to import approximately 400 Holstein-Friesian cattle to strengthen its milking herd and support the expansion of its cow-fattening business. These investments, together with recently completed infrastructure development and increasing penetration into export markets, are expected to enhance production capacity, improve operating efficiencies, and diversify revenue streams over the medium term.

Key Rating Drivers

The ratings remain sensitive to sustained improvement in profitability, maintenance of adequate operating cash flows, and preservation of debt coverage indicators in line with the assigned rating benchmarks. Continued adherence to the prescribed debt matrix will remain a key rating consideration.

Profile
Legal Structure

Sapphire Dairies (Pvt.) Limited ("the Company" or "SDPL") is a private limited company incorporated on January 31, 2008, under the Companies Ordinance, 1984, which has since been repealed with the enactment of the Companies Act, 2017.


Background

SDPL was incorporated in January 2008, representing a deliberate strategic diversification initiative by the Sapphire Group into the dairy sector. Since its establishment, the Company has progressively evolved from a raw milk production unit into a fully vertically integrated dairy enterprise encompassing farm operations, processing, and branded packaging. Key milestones in the Company's evolution include the establishment of processed milk and beverage operations, the development of export capabilities, and the commencement of cow fattening and meat exports, reflecting the Company's continued expansion across the livestock value chain.


Operations

SDPL is principally engaged in the production and processing of milk and dairy products at its dairy farm located on Manga Raiwind Road, District Kasur. During 9MFY26, the Company produced approximately 14.8mln gross liters of milk. The farm currently maintains a herd of around 4500 cattle, of which 2,000 lactating cows, representing nearly 45% of the total herd. The Company's registered/head office is located at 7 A-K, Main Boulevard, Gulberg, Lahore, supporting the efficient management of its production and distribution operations.


Ownership
Ownership Structure

The ultimate effective control of SDPL resides with the Sapphire Group founding family, led by Mr. Mian Mohammad Abdullah, who is the Chairman and Founder of the Sapphire Group of Companies and the principal decision-maker across the group's diversified business interests. SDPL is a subsidiary of Diamond Fabrics Limited, which holds a ~53.755% majority stake in the Company. Sapphire Textile Mills Limited holds a further ~12.946% stake, while Sapphire Fibers Limited holds ~5.509%. The remainder of the shareholding is distributed among other group companies. The entire shareholding base is therefore concentrated within the Sapphire Group corporate structure.


Stability

Ownership stability is considered strong. The Company's long-standing integration within the Sapphire Group's portfolio of businesses reinforces the expectation that the current ownership structure will be maintained in the foreseeable future.


Business Acumen

The sponsors possess demonstrable cross-sectoral business experience accumulated over several decades. The Sapphire Group's operations span textiles, power generation, cement, real estate, and dairy, reflecting a capacity to manage diverse business models and navigate complex operational environments. The group has sustained its growth trajectory through multiple economic cycles characterised by currency depreciation, inflationary pressure, and energy cost volatility, which is indicative of sound strategic judgement and operational discipline.


Financial Strength

The financial strength of SDPL stems from the robust financial backing of its sponsors. This strong sponsorship provides the Company with enhanced financial flexibility, supports future expansion initiatives, and reinforces its ability to withstand industry and economic challenges.


Governance
Board Structure

The Board of Directors of SDPL comprises five members, all of whom belong to the sponsoring group. The Board functions primarily in an advisory capacity, complemented by professional management teams that oversee day-to-day operations. Board meetings are conducted periodically, and financial results are formally presented to the Board for the evaluation of the Company's performance. Minutes of meetings are recorded and maintained.


Members’ Profile

Mr. Mian Mohammad Abdullah serves as Chairman of the Board and is the Founder of the Sapphire Group of Companies. He has been honoured twice with Pakistan's foremost civilian distinction, the Sitara-e-Imtiaz, in recognition of his contributions to the country's business landscape. Mr. Amer Abdullah holds a Master of Business Administration degree from the United States and joined the Sapphire Group in 1990. He has served as a director across various group entities and currently holds the position of Chief Executive Officer of both Diamond Fabrics Limited and Sapphire Dairies (Pvt.) Limited, combining strategic oversight responsibilities across two significant group subsidiaries. Mr. Shahid Abdullah holds a Bachelor of Commerce degree from the University of Karachi and has been associated with the Sapphire Group since 1980, bringing over four decades of group-level experience. He currently serves as Chief Executive Officer of Sapphire Fibres Limited, Amer Cotton Mills (Pvt.) Limited, and Sapphire Electric Company Limited. Mr. Nadeem Abdullah is a graduate of McGill University, Canada, and has served as Chief Executive Officer of Sapphire Textile Mills Limited for sixteen years. He concurrently holds the role of Chief Executive Officer of Sapphire Wind Power Company Limited, providing oversight across the group's textiles and renewable energy interests. Mr. Yousuf Abdullah holds a Master of Business Administration degree from the United Kingdom and serves as Chief Executive Officer of Sapphire Finishing Mills Limited, with additional directorships across other group businesses. He has been a director in various Sapphire Group companies since 1995. Mr. Abdul Sattar Arain is a Fellow Member of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of Pakistan and holds a Master of Commerce degree. He has been with the Sapphire Group since 1981 and has served in key managerial and oversight positions throughout his association with the group. The Board's collective skill set encompasses textiles, energy, finance, and corporate governance, though the composition is concentrated within a single family group, limiting the diversity of independent perspectives.


Board Effectiveness

The Board operates in a predominantly advisory capacity, with sponsors playing an active executive role and providing ongoing guidance to the management team. Board meetings are convened regularly, and financial performance is presented and reviewed at these meetings, with formal minutes recorded and retained. The roles of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer are held by Mr. Mian Mohammad Abdullah and Mr. Amer Abdullah respectively, maintaining a degree of functional separation at the top governance level. The absence of constituted board committees, including an Audit Committee, means that oversight of related-party transactions and financial controls is exercised directly by the Board rather than through a dedicated committee structure, which represents a governance gap relative to established best practice.


Financial Transparency

The external audit function is performed by M/s ShineWing Hameed Chaudhri & Co., Chartered Accountants. The firm is QCR-rated by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of Pakistan (ICAP) and is classified in Category 'B' on the State Bank of Pakistan's (SBP) Panel of Auditors. The auditors have expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company's financial statements for the year ended June 30, 2025.


Management
Organizational Structure

SDPL's organisational structure is designed around two primary business units, namely SDL Farm and SDL Processing, supported by a centralised shared services function. The Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Amer Abdullah, provides strategic direction at the apex of the hierarchy. Operational authority within each business unit is delegated to dedicated unit heads who report upward through the management hierarchy. The shared services function consolidates cross-cutting support disciplines under a single organisational umbrella, facilitating coordination across business units. Decision-making reflects a moderately centralised model given the sponsoring family's active involvement at the executive level, supplemented by professional management at the functional layer.


Management Team

Mr. Amer Abdullah as Chief Executive Officer of SDPL, has been instrumental in directing the Company's strategic expansion within both the textile and dairy segments. His tenure with the Sapphire Group since 1990 provides him with deep institutional knowledge and a long track record of group-level leadership. Mr. Arslan Ahmad, Deputy General Manager of Accounts and Finance, oversees the Company's financial operations including treasury, reporting, and financial management. Mr. Faizan Elahi, the Business Unit Head since 2014, carries responsibility for leading operational strategy and growth initiatives at the farm and processing level, representing over a decade of continuity in operational leadership.


Effectiveness

Management has made tangible progress in executing the Company's strategic priorities, including the implementation of genetic improvement programmes, enhancement of average herd milk yields, expansion of the processed dairy product portfolio, and commencement of export operations. However, the formal establishment of management committees would further strengthen the governance structure, improve oversight, and enhance overall organizational effectiveness.


MIS

The Company implemented the SAP Business One enterprise resource planning system on January 17, 2018, in partnership with ABACUS, a specialist ERP implementation firm. The SAP B1 platform was adopted to streamline core business processes, enhance financial management, and provide real-time operational insights to support informed decision-making. The system is subject to a formal annual update cycle conducted each December in accordance with the implementation agreement. The ERP system supports the Company's integrated operations spanning farm management, processing, quality control, accounts, inventory, and supply chain functions.


Control Environment

SDPL maintains a structured operational control environment with particular emphasis on herd health and biosecurity. Foreign veterinary experts are engaged to oversee animal health protocols, and comprehensive vaccination programmes are implemented to safeguard herd vitality and mitigate disease risk. Environmental and nutritional management practices are applied to ensure livestock welfare standards, including stress-free housing conditions and nutritionally balanced feed regimes. Stocking density is regulated in accordance with established standards to control herd quality and maintain mortality rates at manageable levels. Breeding optimisation practices are employed to sustain lactation yields within operationally feasible parameters. The organisational structure includes an internal audit function as part of the shared services framework, which provides a degree of independent oversight over financial and operational controls.


Business Risk
Industry Dynamics

Pakistan's dairy sector occupies a significant position within the global milk production landscape. According to the Pakistan Economic Survey 2025-26, total milk production increased to 74.7 billion litres, compared to 72.3 billion litres in FY25, comprising 28.1 billion litres of cow milk, 44.4 billion litres of buffalo milk, and the remainder from goats, camels, and sheep. The livestock sector contributed ~14.4% to total gross value added during FY25 and ~67.2% to agricultural value addition, underscoring its macroeconomic significance. The sector supports the livelihoods of more than 8 million rural families, with 35 to 40 percent of their income derived from livestock activities. Pakistan's scale of production, however, contrasts sharply with its processing and formalisation levels. Approximately 97% of total milk consumption is attributed to fresh or loose milk, with processed UHT milk accounting for ~3% of total consumption. The informal distribution network, dominated by traditional milk vendors, holds a market share estimated between 90% and 95%, driven by lower pricing and established consumer trust relationships rather than hygiene or quality differentiation. The formal packaged milk segment is estimated to be growing at 8% to 12% annually in urban markets, supported by rising health awareness, urbanisation, and expanding modern retail infrastructure, yet overall formal market penetration remains limited. A persistent structural weakness in Pakistan's dairy sector is low average milk yield per cow, significantly below the international benchmark of 45 to 55 litres per day, partly attributable to suboptimal breeding, inadequate nutrition, and disease burden. Disease risks including foot-and-mouth disease and lumpy skin disease represent ongoing systemic threats to herd productivity and overall sector output. Cold chain infrastructure deficiencies across rural and peri-urban geographies impede the transition from informal to formal milk distribution. From a regulatory standpoint, the imposition of general sales tax on packaged dairy products has constrained volume growth for formal processors in recent years, exerting pressure on price competitiveness relative to untaxed loose milk. Feed cost volatility, driven by global commodity price movements and domestic supply constraints, represents a primary input cost risk for organised dairy operators. Climate change introduces additional systemic risks through weather disruptions, yield fluctuations, and heightened disease outbreak frequency. The sector's key endemic credit risks include raw milk price sensitivity, feed cost inflation, disease outbreak exposure, cold chain and infrastructure gaps, and the regulatory and tax asymmetry between formal and informal dairy channels. Barriers to entry in the organised corporate dairy segment are moderately high given the capital intensity of farm construction, herd acquisition, processing facility investment, and the regulatory compliance burden, which tends to favour established integrated operators over new entrants.


Relative Position

SDPL holds a differentiated position within Pakistan's organised dairy sector by virtue of its fully vertically integrated farm-to-pack model, which encompasses cattle rearing, raw milk production, processing, packaging, and branded distribution. The farm maintains a herd of ~4,479 cows, positioning it as one of the larger corporate dairy farms in the country. The Company's adoption of automated milk collection technology, international veterinary expertise, and advanced genetic improvement programmes for breed quality distinguishes it from conventional small-scale operators and places it in a segment of the market targeting institutional buyers and quality-conscious consumers. The Company's primary institutional relationship with Nestle Pakistan Limited as the anchor customer for raw milk provides revenue certainty but also concentrates customer exposure. The Company has extended its competitive footprint through the commencement of export operations, the initiation of the fattening farm project, and the expansion of its branded beverage portfolio, reflecting incremental diversification of its revenue base.


Revenues

The Company's net revenue increased to PKR 3.8bln during 9MFY26 (9MFY25: PKR 3.5bln), reflecting a YoY growth of approximately 7%, primarily supported by sustained business volumes. The majority of sales were generated from the local market. Revenue quality remains concentrated, with raw milk as the principal contributor to the topline and Nestlé Pakistan Limited continuing to be the Company's largest institutional customer. While this customer concentration poses a structural risk, the Company continues to pursue diversification initiatives to broaden its revenue base. Non-core income, mainly from the revaluation of dairy livestock, continues to provide supplementary support to profitability.


Margins

The Company's cost structure remains primarily driven by animal feed, energy, veterinary expenses, and labour. During 9MFY26, profitability margins weakened as the gross profit margin declined to 5.5% (9MFY25: 8.7%), primarily due to higher raw material costs, which increased to PKR 4.3bln (9MFY25: PKR 2.3bln). Despite the pressure on operating profitability, the net profit margin remained positive at 2.5% (9MFY25: 3.1%), supported by non-core income, including revaluation gains on dairy livestock.


Sustainability

Management's strategic focus is directed at several growth-enabling initiatives intended to enhance long-term earnings quality and revenue diversification. These include the continued roll-out of advanced genetic improvement programmes for dairy breeds, which are expected to progressively increase average milk yields across the herd and improve unit economics. Following the successful pilot of its fattening farm project, the Company is scaling up operations through the import of approximately 300 Holstein-Friesian cattle from the Netherland and the meat is being exported to UAE.


Financial Risk
Working capital

The Company's working capital profile remains supported by the perishable nature of its products, resulting in a short operating cycle. During 9MFY26, the net working capital cycle improved to negative 10 days (9MFY25: positive 3 days), driven by lower trade receivable days of 11 (9MFY25: 17 days) and higher trade payable days of 25 (9MFY25: 16 days), partially offset by an increase in inventory days to 4 (9MFY25: 2 days). Short-term borrowings increased to PKR 1.6bln (9MFY25: PKR 1.5bln) to support working capital requirements, primarily for feed procurement.


Coverages

The Company's debt servicing capacity remained sufficient during 9MFY26. Finance costs decreased slightly to PKR 200mln (9MFY25: PKR 220mln). On the non-cash front, the Company periodically recognizes mark-to-market gains on its biological assets. However, as these gains are non-cash in nature and excluded from operating cash flow, the actual Funds from Core Operations (FCFO) remained relatively muted, limiting the Company's cash-based debt servicing capacity despite the reported accounting gains.


Capitalization

The Company's capital structure remained stable during 9MFY26, with total borrowings largely unchanged at PKR 2.8bln (9MFY25: PKR 2.7bln), comprising PKR 1.6bln in short-term borrowings and PKR 966mln in long-term debt. Shareholders' equity improved to PKR 4.1bln (9MFY25: PKR 3.9bln), resulting in a slight improvement in leverage to 40.3% (9MFY25: 41.1%). The short-term debt continues to support working capital requirements, while long-term borrowings are primarily utilized for capital investments in farm and processing infrastructure.


 
 

Aug-26

www.pacra.com


(PKR mln)


Mar-26
9M
Jun-25
12M
Jun-24
12M
Jun-23
12M
Management Audited Audited Audited
A. BALANCE SHEET
1. Non-Current Assets 5,601 5,546 5,244 5,102
2. Investments 0 0 0 0
3. Related Party Exposure 0 0 0 0
4. Current Assets 2,522 2,033 1,620 1,375
a. Inventories 88 31 29 36
b. Trade Receivables 232 76 201 76
5. Total Assets 8,123 7,579 6,864 6,477
6. Current Liabilities 756 575 525 522
a. Trade Payables 407 293 272 261
7. Borrowings 2,717 2,451 2,141 1,916
8. Related Party Exposure 0 0 0 0
9. Non-Current Liabilities 548 544 366 288
10. Net Assets 4,102 4,009 3,832 3,750
11. Shareholders' Equity 4,102 4,009 3,832 3,750
B. INCOME STATEMENT
1. Sales 3,779 5,033 4,491 3,401
a. Cost of Good Sold (3,570) (4,551) (4,170) (3,297)
2. Gross Profit 209 483 321 104
a. Operating Expenses (261) (311) (83) (65)
3. Operating Profit (52) 171 239 40
a. Non Operating Income or (Expense) 392 465 299 473
4. Profit or (Loss) before Interest and Tax 340 636 538 513
a. Total Finance Cost (200) (288) (323) (216)
b. Taxation (47) (156) (124) (3)
6. Net Income Or (Loss) 93 192 90 295
C. CASH FLOW STATEMENT
a. Free Cash Flows from Operations (FCFO) (61) 295 298 178
b. Net Cash from Operating Activities before Working Capital Changes (255) (4) (9) (22)
c. Changes in Working Capital (105) (337) (247) (705)
1. Net Cash provided by Operating Activities (360) (341) (256) (726)
2. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Investing Activities 238 9 57 124
3. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Financing Activities 243 355 216 501
4. Net Cash generated or (Used) during the period 121 23 17 (102)
D. RATIO ANALYSIS
1. Performance
a. Sales Growth (for the period) 0.1% 12.1% 32.1% 32.2%
b. Gross Profit Margin 5.5% 9.6% 7.2% 3.1%
c. Net Profit Margin 2.5% 3.8% 2.0% 8.7%
d. Cash Conversion Efficiency (FCFO adjusted for Working Capital/Sales) -4.4% -0.8% 1.1% -15.5%
e. Return on Equity [ Net Profit Margin * Asset Turnover * (Total Assets/Shareholders' Equity )] 3.1% 4.9% 2.4% 8.2%
2. Working Capital Management
a. Gross Working Capital (Average Days) 15 12 14 11
b. Net Working Capital (Average Days) -10 -8 -8 -24
c. Current Ratio (Current Assets / Current Liabilities) 3.3 3.5 3.1 2.6
3. Coverages
a. EBITDA / Finance Cost 0.0 1.3 1.1 1.0
b. FCFO / Finance Cost+CMLTB+Excess STB -0.2 0.5 0.6 0.5
c. Debt Payback (Total Borrowings+Excess STB) / (FCFO-Finance Cost) -3.1 192.9 -49.5 -30.8
4. Capital Structure
a. Total Borrowings / (Total Borrowings+Shareholders' Equity) 39.8% 37.9% 35.8% 33.8%
b. Interest or Markup Payable (Days) 85.7 72.0 81.6 103.9
c. Entity Average Borrowing Rate 10.1% 11.5% 14.9% 12.9%

Aug-26

www.pacra.com

Aug-26

www.pacra.com

  1. Rating Team Statements
    1. Rating is just an opinion about the creditworthiness of the entity and does not constitute a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell any security of the entity rated or to buy, hold, or sell the security rated, as the case may be. (Chapter III; 14-3-(x))
    2. Conflict of Interest
      1. The Rating Team or any of their family members have no interest in this rating (Chapter III; 12-2-(j))
      2. PACRA, the analysts involved in the rating process, and members of its rating committee and their family members do not have any conflict of interest relating to the rating done by them (Chapter III; 12-2-(e) & (k))
      3. The analyst is not a substantial shareholder of the customer being rated by PACRA [Annexure F; d-(ii)]
      4. Explanation: for the purpose of the above clause, the term "family members" shall include only those family members who are dependent on the analyst and members of the rating committee.
  2. Restrictions
    1. No director, officer, or employee of PACRA communicates the information acquired by him for use for rating purposes to any other person, except where required under law to do so. (Chapter III; 10-(5))
    2. PACRA does not disclose or discuss with outside parties or make improper use of the non-public information which has come to its knowledge during a business relationship with the customer. (Chapter III; 10-7-(d))
    3. PACRA does not make proposals or recommendations regarding the activities of rated entities that could impact a credit rating of the entity subject to rating. (Chapter III; 10-7-(k))
  3. Conduct of Business
    1. PACRA fulfills its obligations in a fair, efficient, transparent, and ethical manner and renders high standards of services in performing its functions and obligations. (Chapter III; 11-A-(a))
    2. PACRA uses due care in the preparation of this Rating Report. Our information has been obtained from sources we consider to be reliable, but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. PACRA does not, in every instance, independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing this Rating Report. (Clause 11-(A)(p))
    3. PACRA prohibits its employees and analysts from soliciting money, gifts, or favors from anyone with whom PACRA conducts business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(q))
    4. PACRA ensures before the commencement of the rating process that an analyst or employee has not had a recent employment or other significant business or personal relationship with the rated entity that may cause or may be perceived as causing a conflict of interest. (Chapter III; 11-A-(r))
    5. PACRA maintains the principle of integrity in seeking rating business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(u))
    6. PACRA promptly investigates in the event of misconduct or a breach of the policies, procedures, and controls, and takes appropriate steps to rectify any weaknesses to prevent any recurrence, along with suitable punitive action against the responsible employee(s). (Chapter III; 11-B-(m))
  4. Independence & Conflict of Interest
    1. PACRA receives compensation from the entity being rated or any third party for the rating services it offers. The receipt of this compensation has no influence on PACRA’s opinions or other analytical processes. In all instances, PACRA is committed to preserving the objectivity, integrity, and independence of its ratings. Our relationship is governed by two distinct mandates: i) rating mandate - signed with the entity being rated or issuer of the debt instrument, and ii) fee mandate - signed with the payer, which can be different from the entity.
    2. PACRA does not provide consultancy/advisory services or other services to any of its customers or their associated companies and associated undertakings that are being rated or have been rated by it during the preceding three years, unless it has an adequate mechanism in place ensuring that the provision of such services does not lead to a conflict of interest situation with its rating activities. (Chapter III; 12-2-(d))
    3. PACRA discloses that no shareholder directly or indirectly holding 10% or more of the share capital of PACRA also holds directly or indirectly 10% or more of the share capital of the entity which is subject to rating or the entity which issued the instrument subject to rating by PACRA. (Chapter III; 12-2-(f))
    4. PACRA ensures that the rating assigned to an entity or instrument is not affected by the existence of a business relationship between PACRA and the entity or any other party, or the non-existence of such a relationship. (Chapter III; 12-2-(i))
    5. PACRA ensures that the analysts or any of their family members shall not buy, sell, or engage in any transaction in any security which falls in the analyst’s area of primary analytical responsibility. This clause, however, does not apply to investments in securities through collective investment schemes. (Chapter III; 12-2-(l))
    6. PACRA has established policies and procedures governing investments and trading in securities by its employees and for monitoring the same to prevent insider trading, market manipulation, or any other market abuse. (Chapter III; 11-B-(g))
  5. Monitoring and Review
    1. PACRA monitors all the outstanding ratings continuously, and any potential change therein due to any event associated with the issuer, the security arrangement, the industry, etc., is disseminated to the market immediately and in an effective manner after appropriate consultation with the entity/issuer. (Chapter III; 17-(a))
    2. PACRA reviews all the outstanding ratings periodically on an annual basis. Provided that public dissemination of annual review and in an instance of change in rating will be made. (Chapter III; 17-(b))
    3. PACRA initiates an immediate review of the outstanding rating upon becoming aware of any information that may reasonably be expected to result in downgrading of the rating. (Chapter III; 17-(c))
    4. PACRA engages with the issuer and the debt securities trustee to remain updated on all information pertaining to the rating of the entity/instrument. (Chapter III; 17-(d))
  6. Probability of Default
    1. PACRA’s Rating Scale reflects the expectation of credit risk. The highest rating has the lowest relative likelihood of default (i.e., probability). PACRA’s transition studies capture the historical performance behavior of a specific rating notch. Transition behavior of the assigned rating can be obtained from PACRA’s Transition Study available at our website. (www.pacra.com) However, the actual transition of rating may not follow the pattern observed in the past. (Chapter III; 14-3(f)(vii))
  7. Proprietary Information
    1. All information contained herein is considered proprietary by PACRA. Hence, none of the information in this document can be copied or otherwise reproduced, stored, or disseminated in whole or in part in any form or by any means whatsoever by any person without PACRA’s prior written consent.

Aug-26

www.pacra.com