Rating History
Dissemination Date Long-Term Rating Short-Term Rating Outlook Action Rating Watch
31-Jul-26 A+ A1 Stable Maintain YES
01-Aug-25 A+ A1 Stable Maintain YES
01-Aug-24 A+ A1 Stable Maintain YES
01-Aug-23 A+ A1 Stable Maintain YES
10-Aug-22 A+ A1 Stable Maintain -
About the Entity

GTR was incorporated in 1963 and was listed on the Karachi Stock Exchange in 1982. It is engaged in the manufacturing & marketing of a extensive range of automotive tyres. The Company is majorly owned by Bibojee Services (Pvt.) Limited and Pak Kuwait Investment Company Limited (PKIC), holding ~28% and ~30% shares, respectively. The CEO is Mr. Hussain Kuli Khan, who has extensive professional experience.

Rating Rationale

Ghandhara Tyre & Rubber Company Limited ("GTR" or "the Company") remains a leading player in Pakistan's automotive tyre manufacturing industry and domestic producer of Passenger Car Radial (PCR) tyres, alongside an established presence across Light Truck/Bus, Agricultural, Off-the-Road, SUV, and two-wheeler segments. This diversified product slate enables the Company to serve both OEMs and the replacement/aftermarket market, supported by a long-standing nationwide dealer network and deep OEM penetration. Product quality continues to be reinforced through GTR's technical collaboration with Shandong Huasheng Rubber Co., Ltd. of China, supporting alignment with international manufacturing standards. The domestic tyre industry remains structurally exposed to imported raw materials, including natural and synthetic rubber, carbon black, and steel cord, leaving margins sensitive to international commodity prices, supply chain disruptions, and PKR/USD parity. Easing inflation, reduced policy rate, and a comparatively stable exchange rate supported improved consumer confidence and financing conditions through FY26, translating into a broad-based automotive sector recovery. As per PAMA statistics, FY26 passenger car sales grew by ~38.7% over FY25, LCV and jeep sales by ~40.9%, and truck and bus sales by ~61%, while two- and three-wheeler sales, the largest driver of tyre offtake, rose by ~29.8%; farm tractor sales declined marginally by ~1.4%. The growth momentum also absorbed the geopolitical tensions and regional escalations during 2HFY26 which contributed to firmer raw material prices and intermittent supply chain disruption. Against this backdrop, GTR's topline moved counter to the broader industry trend, declining by ~9.1% during 9MFY26, following a ~13.3% decline in FY25. This was primarily volumetric, reflecting softer farm tyre and replacement market offtake and a shift in sales mix, with margins coming under further pressure from cost inputs that could not be fully passed through. The Company's ownership and governance framework lends considerable strength and comfort to the assigned ratings and remains the primary anchor supporting the credit assessment. GTR benefits from a financially sound and diversified sponsor base, an actively engaged Board with meaningful independent representation, and an experienced management team, reflecting a mature and well-institutionalized governance structure. The financial risk profile continues to reflect pressure on coverage, internal cash flow generation, working capital, and leverage. However, the Company is undertaking extensive measures to reduce inventory and receivables, which expected to improve the working capital cycle and reliance on short-term borrowings for funding working capital requirements. Rating Watch signifies the elevated business and financial risk arising from the performance trends discussed above, and reflects the Committee's continued close monitoring of the Company's trajectory, pending demonstrated progress on management's well-defined business plan, centered on cost efficiency, planned capacity enhancement in the SUV tyre category, a renewed focus on the replacement market, and export diversification beyond Afghanistan, supported by the recent attainment of DOT certification. These developments will continue to be evaluated as part of the Committee's ongoing assessment of the Company's credit profile.

Key Rating Drivers

The ratings remain dependent on sustained revenue growth, meaningful margin and profitability improvement, and a better-balanced business versus financial risk profile, achieved through prudent financial management amid a challenging industry environment and demonstrated compliance with the Company's business plan.

Profile
Legal Structure

Ghandhara Tyre and Rubber Company Limited (formerly known as The General Tyre and Rubber Company of Pakistan Limited), hereinafter referred to as 'the Company' or 'GTR', was incorporated in Pakistan on March 7, 1963, as a private limited company under the Companies Act, 1913, and was subsequently converted into a public limited company. The Company is registered and headquartered at H-23/2, Landhi Industrial Trading Estate, Landhi, Karachi, Pakistan. GTR is listed on the Pakistan Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol GTYR. As of June 30, 2025, the Company has a total of 121.933 million shares outstanding held by 5,466 shareholders, with a free float of ~40% of total shares.


Background

The Company was originally established by General Tire International Corporation (GTIC) of the United States in 1963, commencing production in 1964 from a manufacturing plant situated on a 25-acre plot in Landhi, Karachi, with an initial annual production capacity of ~120,000 tyres. The founding investment underpinning the plant construction was valued at USD 4 million. A significant ownership transition took place in 1977 when GTIC divested ~90% of its shareholding to Bibojee Services (Private) Limited, marking the effective transfer of sponsorship to domestic institutional hands. The Company was subsequently listed on the Karachi Stock Exchange in 1982, further broadening its shareholder base. Over the ensuing decades, GTR pursued organic capacity expansions progressively scaling its production capability well beyond its original founding levels. A further milestone in the Company's corporate evolution was its renaming from The General Tyre and Rubber Company of Pakistan Limited to Ghandhara Tyre and Rubber Company Limited, reflecting its transition to fully domestic ownership identity. The Company entered into a technical collaboration arrangement with Shandong Huasheng Rubber of China, providing access to international manufacturing standards and product development expertise.


Operations

The Company is one of Pakistan's leading tyre manufacturers and the only local producer of Passenger Car Radial (PCR) tyres, catering to approximately 75% of the domestic OEM demand in this segment. The Company manufactures and markets a diversified range of tyres, including radial tyres for passenger cars, light commercial vehicles (LCVs), vans, jeeps, pickups, and buses, alongside bias (cross-ply) tyres for trucks, tractors, rickshaws, and motorcycles. This diversified product portfolio enables the Company to serve both the original equipment manufacturer (OEM) and replacement markets. The Company operates an integrated manufacturing facility in Karachi with an installed production capacity of approximately 2.8mln automotive tyres per annum, while its motorcycle tyre plant has an annual production capacity of around 1.6mln tyres. Supported by a well-established nationwide distribution network and long-standing technical collaboration with a foreign technology partner, GTR continues to focus on product quality, manufacturing efficiency, and technological advancement. Operations remain predominantly driven by the domestic market, with exports constituting a relatively small share of total sales. The Company's customer base comprises leading original equipment manufacturers (OEMs), including Pak Suzuki Motors, Honda Atlas Cars, Indus Motor Company, and Al-Ghazi Tractors, alongside an established presence in the replacement market through its nationwide dealer network. During FY25, production stood at ~2mln tyre sets. Going forward, efficient capacity utilization, sustained demand from both OEM and replacement segments, and the Company's ability to maintain competitiveness amid evolving industry dynamics and imported tyre competition will remain key determinants of its operational performance.


Ownership
Ownership Structure

The Company's shareholding structure is anchored by two principal institutional sponsors. Bibojee Services (Private) Limited holds ~27.8% of the total issued shares, while Pakistan Kuwait Investment Company (Private) Limited holds ~30% of the total issued shares. Together, these two sponsors collectively hold ~57.8% of the Company's outstanding shares as of June 30, 2025. The remaining ~40% of shares constitute the public free float, held across ~5,466 shareholders as of June 30, 2025. There is no disclosed foreign shareholder holding a significant direct stake beyond the institutional sponsors. The effective strategic decision-maker at the sponsor level resides with Bibojee Services (Private) Limited, which holds management control and board chairmanship through its nominee directors.


Stability

The current sponsorship arrangement has been in place since 1977, when Bibojee Services (Private) Limited assumed the majority stake from the original founder, General Tire International Corporation. The ownership structure has remained substantively unchanged since that transition, reflecting a high degree of continuity and stability. Pakistan Kuwait Investment Company (Private) Limited has maintained its ~30% shareholding over an extended period, reinforcing the stability of the institutional ownership base. No material ownership disputes, share pledge arrangements, or forced divestiture events have been disclosed. The combined sponsor holding of ~57.8% provides a controlling majority that insulates the Company from hostile changes in strategic direction.


Business Acumen

Bibojee Services (Private) Limited is a conglomerate with diversified interests across Textile, Automobile, Insurance, Tyres and Rubber, and Construction sectors, demonstrating broad industrial and commercial management capability. Under the stewardship of the current sponsors, the Company has evolved from a nascent manufacturer with a capacity of ~120,000 tyres per annum at inception to a multi-segment producer with aggregate annual capacity of ~4.4 million tyres. The achievement of the sole domestic PCR producer status and sustained OEM relationships reflect the sponsors' ability to direct strategic growth and navigate a competitive manufacturing environment. Pakistan Kuwait Investment Company (Private) Limited, as a state-owned joint venture between the Government of Pakistan and the Government of Kuwait, brings institutional credibility and governance depth.


Financial Strength

Bibojee Services (Private) Limited maintains strategic equity interests across sectors including Textile, Insurance, Automobile, and Construction, underpinning a diversified group financial base. Pakistan Kuwait Investment Company (Private) Limited holds ~30% shares in Meezan Bank Limited, ~30% in Al-Meezan Investment Management Limited, and ~17.6% in National Clearing Company of Pakistan Limited, reflecting a portfolio of strategic financial sector investments. The combined financial depth of the two sponsors provides a credible backstop for the entity, and their sustained multi-decade commitment to the Company's equity base is indicative of willingness to support the enterprise through varied economic cycles.


Governance
Board Structure

The Board of Directors comprises 10 members as of 9MFY26, including three independent directors (one of whom is a female), six non-executive directors, and one executive director. The Board is chaired by Lt. Gen. (Retd.) Ali Kuli Khan Khattak, while management control rests with Bibojee Services (Pvt.) Ltd., the Company’s principal sponsor.


Members’ Profile

Lt. Gen. (Retd.) Ali Kuli Khan Khattak, Chairman of the Board, brings extensive leadership experience and strategic insight, particularly within the automotive and allied industries. The Company's Chief Executive Officer and Executive Director, Mr. Hussain Kuli Khan, holds a degree in Business Administration from Gettysburg College, USA, and possesses over 26 years of industry experience, complemented by technical training at Continental AG, Germany. The Board is further supported by experienced professionals from diverse backgrounds, including finance, corporate strategy, and industrial operations. Notably, Mr. Ahmad Kuli Khan Khattak brings over 25 years of experience in the automotive sector and serves on the boards of several associated companies, while Mr. Muhammad Kuli Khan Khattak contributes significant business and industry expertise. The Board's oversight is further strengthened by the presence of three independent directors, including Mrs. Nazia Qureshi, fostering a balanced governance framework and reinforcing sound corporate governance practices.


Board Effectiveness

The Board maintains an effective oversight and control framework through its constituted sub-committees, which discharge their respective mandates on a regular basis. The Audit Committee provides oversight of financial reporting integrity, internal audit findings, and related-party transactions, ensuring that management disclosures are subject to independent scrutiny. The Human Resource and Remuneration Committee supports governance of executive compensation and personnel policies. The formal separation of the Chairman and CEO roles ensures that board oversight of management is structurally independent. Meeting proceedings are documented with maintained minutes, reflecting procedural discipline in governance conduct.


Financial Transparency

An effective Internal Audit department reporting to the Audit Committee is in place. The External Auditor of the Company are M/s ShineWing Hameed Chaudhri & Co - Chartered Accountants. They expressed an unqualified opinion on the financial statements of the Company for the period ended June 30th, 2025.


Management
Organizational Structure

The Company has a comprehensive organizational structure with clearly defined departmental responsibilities and hierarchical reporting lines. The Chief Executive Officer (CEO) leads the organization, supported by departmental heads overseeing key functions including Sales & Marketing, Finance & Accounts, Operations & Manufacturing, Supply Chain, Information Technology, Internal Audit, Human Resources, and Legal & Corporate Affairs. Each department operates under its respective leadership with direct reporting to the CEO, ensuring streamlined communication, operational discipline, and alignment with the Company’s strategic objectives.


Management Team

Mr. Hussain Kuli Khan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, possesses over 25 years of industry experience. He holds a degree in Business Administration from Gettysburg College, USA, and has undergone six months of technical training at Continental AG's tyre manufacturing facilities in Europe. He is supported by a team of experienced professionals across key functional areas, ensuring effective operational and financial oversight. Mr. Amjad Waqar recently assumed the position of Chief Financial Officer (CFO) and brings over 22 years of professional experience in finance and corporate management. Mr. Muhammad Maaz Iqbal serves as the Chief Human Resources Officer, with approximately 18 years of experience in human resource management, while Mr. Ather Ali Khan serves as the Company Secretary, overseeing corporate governance and regulatory compliance. The experienced management team provides continuity in operations and supports the Company's strategic objectives.


Effectiveness

The management committee is headed by CEO, Mr. Hussain Kuli Khan. The committee also includes the Chief Financial Officer, Executive Director Works, Executive Director Corporate Service & HR and Executive Director Marketing. Further, different departments’ heads are responsible for ensuring smooth running of their relevant departments.


MIS

The Company has implemented an all-in-one SAP ERP system comprising nine modules to support its operational and financial processes. The system is utilized across key functional areas, enabling integrated information management and standardized reporting. In addition, the Company has established a comprehensive business continuity plan, encompassing risk assessment procedures and disaster recovery policies. The framework is intended to facilitate business continuity by outlining response mechanisms for potential operational disruptions and supporting the timely recovery of critical business functions.


Control Environment

An independent Internal Audit department is operational within the Company, reporting directly to the Audit Committee of the Board, thereby maintaining structural independence from executive management. This department plays a central role in evaluating compliance with internal policies, assessing control effectiveness across business units, and providing the Audit Committee with independent assurance on governance matters. The Company's control framework is supported by clearly demarcated departmental responsibilities and the SAP-based MIS infrastructure, which facilitates audit trails and transactional controls. No material regulatory penalties or enforcement actions have been disclosed in the reviewed reporting periods.


Business Risk
Industry Dynamics

The domestic tyre industry remained on a recovery trajectory during FY26, supported by improving macroeconomic fundamentals and a gradual normalization of automotive demand. Easing inflation, a more stable exchange rate, and successive reductions in policy rates improved purchasing power, revived consumer financing, and encouraged higher transportation and commercial activity. These developments translated into stronger demand across most vehicle categories, providing a more favorable operating environment for local tyre manufacturers following the challenging conditions experienced over the preceding two years. The industry's demand profile remains fundamentally supported by the replacement market, which accounts for nearly four-fifths of total tyre consumption, while the remaining demand originates from original equipment manufacturers (OEMs). This demand mix provides a degree of resilience, as replacement demand is driven primarily by the existing vehicle fleet rather than new automobile sales, thereby mitigating the cyclicality associated with vehicle production. Pakistan's tyre manufacturing industry generated estimated revenues of ~PKR 149.9 billion during FY25, compared with PKR 141.9 billion in SPLY, representing annual growth of ~5.6%. The recovery followed a significant contraction recorded in FY23, when elevated financing costs, severe foreign exchange constraints, import restrictions, and production stoppages across automobile assemblers materially weakened sector activity. Despite the improvement in revenue generation, manufacturing capacity remained underutilized. Rated industry participants collectively possess installed production capacity of ~39.9 million tyres annually; however, average utilization remained around 64% as of FY25, reflecting persistent competition from imported tyres, particularly within passenger vehicle and light commercial vehicle categories. Demand indicators during FY26 remained encouraging, especially across the segments served by the Company. Data published by the Pakistan Automotive Manufacturers Association (PAMA) shows that motorcycle and three-wheeler sales increased by ~30% during FY26 to around 1.97 million units, compared with ~1.51 million units during the corresponding period of the previous year. Given that motorcycles constitute the largest contributor to domestic tyre volumes, this growth provides meaningful support to industry demand. Likewise, truck and bus sales expanded by ~63% over the same period, reaching 15,863 units versus 9,676 units a year earlier, reflecting improving freight movement, higher logistics activity, and continued momentum in infrastructure-related projects. Conversely, tractor sales declined by ~1.3% to 28,791 units during FY26, indicating relatively subdued agricultural investment and weaker demand for mechanization. However, this segment represents a comparatively smaller portion of overall tyre demand and is therefore expected to have only a limited impact on the industry's aggregate performance. Despite the favorable demand dynamics, profitability within the tyre industry remains closely linked to imported raw material costs. Approximately three-quarters of manufacturing expenses are attributable to raw materials, including natural rubber, synthetic rubber, carbon black, steel cord, tyre fabric, and specialty chemicals. These inputs are imported largely from China, Malaysia, Thailand, Ivory Coast, and other African sourcing markets, making the industry's cost structure inherently sensitive to international commodity prices and movements in the PKR/USD exchange rate. Consequently, maintaining exchange rate stability remains an important determinant of earnings and margin sustainability for domestic manufacturers.


Relative Position

GTR maintains an established presence in Pakistan's four-wheeler tyre segment, supported by its long-standing manufacturing expertise and diversified product portfolio. The Company remains the only domestic manufacturer of Passenger Car Radial (PCR) tyres and has also built a strong position in the tractor tyre segment. Its four wheeler portfolio further encompasses Light Truck/Bus (LTB) and SUV tyres, enabling it to cater to a broad spectrum of automotive and agricultural applications. In the two- and three-wheeler tyre segment, the Company currently holds a modest market share but continues to strengthen its market presence through ongoing product and distribution initiatives. GTR is also intensifying its focus on the replacement market (RM) while maintaining long-standing relationships with original equipment manufacturers (OEMs), supporting a balanced revenue mix across both channels.


Revenues

During 9MFY26, the Company reported a topline of PKR ~12,132mln. Revenue declined by ~13.3% to PKR ~17,800mln in FY25, compared to PKR ~20,539mln in FY24, primarily reflecting subdued demand and competitive market dynamics. The Company's production mix remained concentrated in Passenger Car Radial (PCR) and Motorcycle tyres, which accounted for 43.1% and 42.6% of total production, respectively. The remaining production comprised Light Truck Radial Tyres (5.3%), Farm Rear Tyres (3.2%), Farm Front Tyres (2.7%), Light Truck Bias Tyres (2.4%), and Truck/Bus Bias Tyres (0.8%). Collectively, PCR and Motorcycle tyres represented 85.7% of total production, underscoring the Company's strategic focus on its core, high-volume product segments.


Margins

The Company's profitability margins deteriorated during 9MFY26, with the gross profit margin declining to 12.1% from 12.8% in FY25 and 16.0% in FY24, indicating higher cost pressures relative to revenue generation. Likewise, the net profit margin weakened to -2.8% 9MFY26, compared with -2.1% in 9MFY25 and 1.1% in 9MFY24, reflecting the combined impact of compressed gross margins, elevated finance costs, and increased pressure on overall profitability.


Sustainability

The Company's strategic focus on increasing export volumes, strengthening its presence in the SUV OEM segment, and expanding its replacement market dealer network provides clear avenues for revenue diversification and long-term growth. Management is also evaluating the expansion of its passenger vehicle tyre portfolio by extending manufacturing capabilities to produce SUV tyres ranging from 18 to 22 inches, enabling the Company to cater to the growing demand for higher-specification vehicles. On the export front, the Company aims to deepen its footprint in the Middle East while further strengthening its position in the U.S. market through the attainment and maintenance of Department of Transportation (DOT) certification, which supports access to export opportunities. In addition, the ongoing expansion of the Company's solar energy project represents a tangible step towards reducing energy cost exposure, enhancing conversion cost efficiency, and improving overall operating margins over the medium term.


Financial Risk
Working capital

The Company's working capital cycle lengthened during 9MFY26, with gross working capital days increasing to 227 days, compared to 196 days in FY25 and 147 days in FY24, primarily reflecting higher inventory and receivable holding periods. Consequently, net working capital days rose to 177 days in 9MFY26, from 149 days in FY25 and 106 days in FY24, indicating relatively slower cash conversion and increased working capital requirements. While the increase in working capital days warrants continued monitoring, maintaining efficient inventory and receivable management will remain important to contain reliance on short-term borrowings and preserve financial flexibility.


Coverages

Coverage indicators continued to weaken, with FCFO-to-finance cost declining to 1.1x in 9MFY26 from 1.6x in the corresponding period last year (FY25: 1.2x; FY24: 1.7x). The persistent erosion in coverage is primarily attributable to the continued decline in the Company's free cash flows from operations (FCFO), which fell to PKR ~932mln in 9MFY26 (FY25: PKR ~1,634mln; FY24: PKR ~2,713mln). This deterioration occurred despite a reduction in finance costs following the easing of interest rates, indicating that weaker operating cash generation more than offset the benefit of lower borrowing costs. Sustained pressure on cash flow generation may continue to constrain debt servicing capacity and remains a key consideration for the Company's financial risk profile.


Capitalization

The Company’s capital structure remains leveraged, with total borrowings of PKR ~9,498 million as of (FY25: PKR ~9,088 million). The gearing ratio rose slighty to ~59.8% in 9MFY26 (FY25: ~57.4%), largely due to short-term debt, which makes up ~95.9% of total borrowings (FY25: ~94.7%). The predominance of short-term financing reflects the Company's working capital-intensive operations and exposes it to refinancing and interest rate risks. Going forward, prudent working capital management and a gradual reduction in reliance on short-term debt will remain important for improving the Company's financial risk profile


 
 

Jul-26

www.pacra.com


(PKR mln)


Mar-26
9M
Jun-25
12M
Jun-24
12M
Jun-23
12M
Management Audited Audited Audited
A. BALANCE SHEET
1. Non-Current Assets 8,323 8,549 7,344 7,709
2. Investments 0 0 0 0
3. Related Party Exposure 69 50 34 25
4. Current Assets 12,462 12,827 11,470 10,540
a. Inventories 6,952 6,662 5,078 4,812
b. Trade Receivables 2,830 3,671 3,693 2,941
5. Total Assets 20,853 21,426 18,848 18,275
6. Current Liabilities 4,077 4,837 4,839 4,697
a. Trade Payables 1,881 2,534 2,082 2,541
7. Borrowings 9,498 9,088 7,303 7,119
8. Related Party Exposure 0 0 0 0
9. Non-Current Liabilities 884 763 710 705
10. Net Assets 6,394 6,738 5,995 5,754
11. Shareholders' Equity 6,394 6,738 5,995 5,754
B. INCOME STATEMENT
1. Sales 12,132 17,800 20,539 15,019
a. Cost of Good Sold (10,659) (15,528) (17,261) (12,727)
2. Gross Profit 1,472 2,272 3,278 2,292
a. Operating Expenses (924) (1,185) (1,218) (938)
3. Operating Profit 548 1,086 2,060 1,353
a. Non Operating Income or (Expense) 103 114 116 (255)
4. Profit or (Loss) before Interest and Tax 651 1,201 2,176 1,098
a. Total Finance Cost (881) (1,351) (1,674) (1,292)
b. Taxation (113) (216) (267) 26
6. Net Income Or (Loss) (344) (366) 235 (167)
C. CASH FLOW STATEMENT
a. Free Cash Flows from Operations (FCFO) 932 1,634 2,713 1,431
b. Net Cash from Operating Activities before Working Capital Changes 38 186 1,046 336
c. Changes in Working Capital (412) (1,528) (950) 391
1. Net Cash provided by Operating Activities (375) (1,342) 95 727
2. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Investing Activities (108) (129) (149) (223)
3. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Financing Activities 552 1,443 (103) (2,025)
4. Net Cash generated or (Used) during the period 70 (28) (156) (1,521)
D. RATIO ANALYSIS
1. Performance
a. Sales Growth (for the period) -9.1% -13.3% 36.8% -19.2%
b. Gross Profit Margin 12.1% 12.8% 16.0% 15.3%
c. Net Profit Margin -2.8% -2.1% 1.1% -1.1%
d. Cash Conversion Efficiency (FCFO adjusted for Working Capital/Sales) 4.3% 0.6% 8.6% 12.1%
e. Return on Equity [ Net Profit Margin * Asset Turnover * (Total Assets/Shareholders' Equity )] -7.0% -5.8% 4.0% -3.5%
2. Working Capital Management
a. Gross Working Capital (Average Days) 227 196 147 189
b. Net Working Capital (Average Days) 177 149 106 138
c. Current Ratio (Current Assets / Current Liabilities) 3.1 2.7 2.4 2.2
3. Coverages
a. EBITDA / Finance Cost 1.4 1.4 1.7 1.4
b. FCFO / Finance Cost+CMLTB+Excess STB 0.6 0.8 1.4 0.7
c. Debt Payback (Total Borrowings+Excess STB) / (FCFO-Finance Cost) 11.7 3.5 0.6 7.6
4. Capital Structure
a. Total Borrowings / (Total Borrowings+Shareholders' Equity) 59.8% 57.4% 54.9% 55.3%
b. Interest or Markup Payable (Days) 85.4 77.9 86.6 108.5
c. Entity Average Borrowing Rate 12.0% 15.6% 21.8% 16.4%

Jul-26

www.pacra.com

Jul-26

www.pacra.com

  1. Rating Team Statements
    1. Rating is just an opinion about the creditworthiness of the entity and does not constitute a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell any security of the entity rated or to buy, hold, or sell the security rated, as the case may be. (Chapter III; 14-3-(x))
    2. Conflict of Interest
      1. The Rating Team or any of their family members have no interest in this rating (Chapter III; 12-2-(j))
      2. PACRA, the analysts involved in the rating process, and members of its rating committee and their family members do not have any conflict of interest relating to the rating done by them (Chapter III; 12-2-(e) & (k))
      3. The analyst is not a substantial shareholder of the customer being rated by PACRA [Annexure F; d-(ii)]
      4. Explanation: for the purpose of the above clause, the term "family members" shall include only those family members who are dependent on the analyst and members of the rating committee.
  2. Restrictions
    1. No director, officer, or employee of PACRA communicates the information acquired by him for use for rating purposes to any other person, except where required under law to do so. (Chapter III; 10-(5))
    2. PACRA does not disclose or discuss with outside parties or make improper use of the non-public information which has come to its knowledge during a business relationship with the customer. (Chapter III; 10-7-(d))
    3. PACRA does not make proposals or recommendations regarding the activities of rated entities that could impact a credit rating of the entity subject to rating. (Chapter III; 10-7-(k))
  3. Conduct of Business
    1. PACRA fulfills its obligations in a fair, efficient, transparent, and ethical manner and renders high standards of services in performing its functions and obligations. (Chapter III; 11-A-(a))
    2. PACRA uses due care in the preparation of this Rating Report. Our information has been obtained from sources we consider to be reliable, but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. PACRA does not, in every instance, independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing this Rating Report. (Clause 11-(A)(p))
    3. PACRA prohibits its employees and analysts from soliciting money, gifts, or favors from anyone with whom PACRA conducts business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(q))
    4. PACRA ensures before the commencement of the rating process that an analyst or employee has not had a recent employment or other significant business or personal relationship with the rated entity that may cause or may be perceived as causing a conflict of interest. (Chapter III; 11-A-(r))
    5. PACRA maintains the principle of integrity in seeking rating business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(u))
    6. PACRA promptly investigates in the event of misconduct or a breach of the policies, procedures, and controls, and takes appropriate steps to rectify any weaknesses to prevent any recurrence, along with suitable punitive action against the responsible employee(s). (Chapter III; 11-B-(m))
  4. Independence & Conflict of Interest
    1. PACRA receives compensation from the entity being rated or any third party for the rating services it offers. The receipt of this compensation has no influence on PACRA’s opinions or other analytical processes. In all instances, PACRA is committed to preserving the objectivity, integrity, and independence of its ratings. Our relationship is governed by two distinct mandates: i) rating mandate - signed with the entity being rated or issuer of the debt instrument, and ii) fee mandate - signed with the payer, which can be different from the entity.
    2. PACRA does not provide consultancy/advisory services or other services to any of its customers or their associated companies and associated undertakings that are being rated or have been rated by it during the preceding three years, unless it has an adequate mechanism in place ensuring that the provision of such services does not lead to a conflict of interest situation with its rating activities. (Chapter III; 12-2-(d))
    3. PACRA discloses that no shareholder directly or indirectly holding 10% or more of the share capital of PACRA also holds directly or indirectly 10% or more of the share capital of the entity which is subject to rating or the entity which issued the instrument subject to rating by PACRA. (Chapter III; 12-2-(f))
    4. PACRA ensures that the rating assigned to an entity or instrument is not affected by the existence of a business relationship between PACRA and the entity or any other party, or the non-existence of such a relationship. (Chapter III; 12-2-(i))
    5. PACRA ensures that the analysts or any of their family members shall not buy, sell, or engage in any transaction in any security which falls in the analyst’s area of primary analytical responsibility. This clause, however, does not apply to investments in securities through collective investment schemes. (Chapter III; 12-2-(l))
    6. PACRA has established policies and procedures governing investments and trading in securities by its employees and for monitoring the same to prevent insider trading, market manipulation, or any other market abuse. (Chapter III; 11-B-(g))
  5. Monitoring and Review
    1. PACRA monitors all the outstanding ratings continuously, and any potential change therein due to any event associated with the issuer, the security arrangement, the industry, etc., is disseminated to the market immediately and in an effective manner after appropriate consultation with the entity/issuer. (Chapter III; 17-(a))
    2. PACRA reviews all the outstanding ratings periodically on an annual basis. Provided that public dissemination of annual review and in an instance of change in rating will be made. (Chapter III; 17-(b))
    3. PACRA initiates an immediate review of the outstanding rating upon becoming aware of any information that may reasonably be expected to result in downgrading of the rating. (Chapter III; 17-(c))
    4. PACRA engages with the issuer and the debt securities trustee to remain updated on all information pertaining to the rating of the entity/instrument. (Chapter III; 17-(d))
  6. Probability of Default
    1. PACRA’s Rating Scale reflects the expectation of credit risk. The highest rating has the lowest relative likelihood of default (i.e., probability). PACRA’s transition studies capture the historical performance behavior of a specific rating notch. Transition behavior of the assigned rating can be obtained from PACRA’s Transition Study available at our website. (www.pacra.com) However, the actual transition of rating may not follow the pattern observed in the past. (Chapter III; 14-3(f)(vii))
  7. Proprietary Information
    1. All information contained herein is considered proprietary by PACRA. Hence, none of the information in this document can be copied or otherwise reproduced, stored, or disseminated in whole or in part in any form or by any means whatsoever by any person without PACRA’s prior written consent.

Jul-26

www.pacra.com