Rating History
Dissemination Date Long-Term Rating Short-Term Rating Outlook Action Rating Watch
24-Jul-26 AA A1+ Stable Maintain -
25-Jul-25 AA A1+ Stable Maintain -
26-Jul-24 AA A1+ Stable Maintain -
27-Jul-23 AA A1+ Stable Maintain -
29-Jul-22 AA A1+ Stable Maintain -
About the Entity

EFERT was incorporated in 2009 as a listed company with the principal objective of manufacturing and marketing urea and other fertilizer products. The Company operates three production facilities: the base plant and EnVen at Daharki with (975,000 MT & 1,300,000 MT capacity), respectively; and an NPK facility at Zarkhez (100,000 MT capacity), while DAP and other phosphatic fertilizers are imported and marketed through an established nationwide distribution network. EFert remains a subsidiary of Engro Holdings through Engro Corporation Limited, which holds approximately 56.27% shareholding. Other significant stakeholders include insurance companies (~10.39%), mutual funds (~3.46%), and the general public (~20.6%). Mr. Ahsan Zafar Syed chairs the Board, while Mr. Imran Ahmed serves as Chief Executive Officer.

Rating Rationale

The assigned ratings reflect Engro Fertilizers Limited's ("EFert" or "the Company") entrenched market position as one of Pakistan's leading fertilizer manufacturers, underpinned by a strong operational footprint, established brand equity, an extensive nationwide distribution network, and the financial strength derived from its association with Engro Holdings Limited, one of Pakistan's leading conglomerates with a diversified business portfolio. During CY25, the Company consolidated its competitive standing, retaining a significant market presence and commanding ~34% share of Pakistan's urea offtake, reflective of its distribution capabilities and brand strength. The fertilizer industry occupies a pivotal position within Pakistan's economy, given its direct linkage to agricultural output, food security, and the income base of a predominantly agrarian population. Demand, nonetheless, continued to be shaped by crop economics, prevailing weather conditions, and farmers' purchasing power. Against this backdrop, EFert delivered an improved financial performance during CY25, supported by higher fertilizer sales, favorable pricing, and sustained operational efficiencies, translating into healthy profitability and robust cash flow generation.
The Company's financial performance strengthened during CY25. On an unconsolidated basis, revenue increased to PKR 193.2bln (CY24: PKR 186.7bln), reflecting continued business momentum. Gross margin improved to ~35.4% in CY25 (CY24: ~33.0%), owing to favorable pricing dynamics and efficient cost management. However, net profit declined to ~PKR 23.8bln (CY24: ~PKR 30.2bln), compressing net margin to ~12.3% (CY24: ~16.2%), mainly due to higher finance costs. During 1QCY26, revenue stood at PKR 26.3bln (+8.2% YoY), while net profit further declined to ~PKR 2.9bln (net margin: ~11.0%) compared to ~PKR 3.9bln in 1QCY25 (net margin: ~16.2%), reflecting elevated finance costs due to higher borrowings. Despite this, the Company's financial risk profile remains strong, underpinned by robust operating cash flows, with FCFO’s reporting at PKR 31.5 bln during CY25from PKR 11.9bln in the preceding year. Working capital requirements remained elevated due to higher inventory holdings and seasonal trade receivables, resulting in greater reliance on short-term borrowings.
The capital structure remains leveraged, with gearing rising to 64.4% during 1QCY26. This increase is primarily attributable to higher long-term borrowings secured to finance the Production Enhancement Facility (PEF) project and maintenance capital expenditure. The PEF project is aimed at improving plant reliability, operational efficiency and production optimization. Short-term borrowings accounted for 32% of the total debt mix, primarily reflecting working capital requirements.

Key Rating Drivers

The ratings remain dependent upon the Company's ability to sustain its strong market position, maintain operational efficiencies and preserve healthy cash flow generation amidst evolving industry dynamics and increasing competitive pressures. Sustained profitability, supported by stable demand fundamentals and effective management of input cost volatility, will continue to support the assigned ratings.

Profile
Legal Structure

Engro Fertilizers Limited (“EFert” or “the Company”) was incorporated in 2009 under the repealed Companies Ordinance, 1984 (now the Companies Act, 2017). The Company is listed on the Pakistan Stock Exchange and has emerged as one of the leading players in Pakistan's fertilizer industry, supported by its extensive production capacity, diversified product portfolio, and well-established nationwide distribution network.


Background

The Company traces its origin to the demerger of Engro Chemical Pakistan Limited, a move necessitated by the conglomerate's strategic restructuring and expansion into multiple sectors. The demerger was executed strategically to allow Engro Holdings to allocate capital more efficiently across its diversified portfolio—which now encompasses fertilizers, petrochemicals, energy, telecommunications infrastructure, and food and agriculture businesses. EFERT emerged as the flagship entity for the Group's fertilizer operations, assuming responsibility for manufacturing, marketing, and distribution of a comprehensive range of fertilizer products across Pakistan. This structure has enabled the Group to pursue independent strategic initiatives in each business while maintaining operational and financial synergies through a strong parent company framework.


Operations

EFert, a leading name in the country’s urea producers, is primarily in the business of manufacturing and marketing urea and other fertilizer products.The Company's product portfolio is comprehensive and strategically positioned across multiple segments; Urea products, Marketed under the "Engro Urea" brand, representing the largest revenue contributor and the core driver of the Company's market leadership position. Urea comprises approximately 75-80% of EFERT's revenue and reflects the Company's strategy to dominate the largest fertilizer segment; Complex NPK Fertilizer, Marketed as "Zarkhez," addressing the balanced nutrient requirements of modern agriculture and catering to farmers seeking comprehensive soil enrichment solutions; Phosphate-based Products, Including Diammonium Phosphate (DAP) sold under the "Engro DAP" brand and Monoammonium Phosphate (MAP) marketed as "Zorawar," catering to specialty crop requirements and commanding premium pricing and; Zinc-based Micronutrient Fertilizer, Marketed as "Zingro," addressing trace mineral deficiency in soil and reflecting the Company's commitment to comprehensive agricultural nutrition. The Company has three production facilities, out of which two are Urea plants located in Daharki (Base and Enven Plant) and one is an NPK plant in Port Qasim, Karachi. The total designed capacity of EFert’s urea plants, base plant: 975,000 MT per annum and Enven: 1,300,000 MT per annum. NPK has a total capacity of 100,000 MT. DAP is imported. DAP is sourced through imports. The Company has cultivated a robust countrywide distribution network, supported by extensive dealer relationships, professional sales teams, and integrated logistics infrastructure. This distribution advantage has been instrumental in EFERT's ability to achieve higher urea offtake volumes and maintain strong dealer relationships even during periods of demand softness.


Ownership
Ownership Structure

EFERT is majority-owned by Engro Holdings through Engro Corporation Limited, which holds approximately 56.3% of the Company's issued share capital. The remaining shareholding is distributed across the general public (approximately 20.90%), insurance companies (approximately 8.29%), mutual funds (approximately 2.20%), and financial institutions (approximately 1.81%). This ownership structure, with a dominant institutional sponsor and a broad public float, provides the Company with both strategic direction and market credibility while maintaining transparency through its listing on the Pakistan Stock Exchange. The concentration of ownership with Engro Holdings reflects the strategic importance of the fertilizer business to the overall Group portfolio, while the public float ensures market discipline and governance oversight through minority shareholder engagement.


Stability

The ownership structure is viewed as stable over the foreseeable future, given the unwavering commitment of Engro Holdings to its fertilizer operations. The Dawood Group, the principal shareholder through Engro Holdings, has a long-standing presence in Pakistan's industrial landscape spanning multiple decades, with a demonstrated track record of strategic stewardship and long-term value creation.


Business Acumen

The Group's continued investment in EFERT's operational capacity, evidenced by capex program including the PEF project and sustained capital allocation underscore its commitment to the business. The strategic importance of fertilizers to Pakistan's agricultural economy, combined with EFERT's market leadership position, provides comfort to support the business through commodity cycles and macroeconomic fluctuations.


Financial Strength

The Company's financial strength remains robust, underpinned by a strong equity base of PKR ~42.7bln as at Mar-26 (CY25: PKR ~44.7bln, CY24: PKR ~47.4) and a sizeable asset base of PKR ~204.7bln as at Mar-26 (CY25: PKR ~199.1bln, CY24: PKR ~170.6bln). The expansion in the asset base is primarily attributable to higher inventory levels and increased capital expenditure associated with the Production Enhancement Facility (PEF) project, supported through additional long-term borrowings. The Company's strong capitalization, healthy cash flow generation, and access to diversified funding sources continue to provide financial flexibility to support ongoing growth initiatives while maintaining a comfortable financial risk profile.


Governance
Board Structure

The Company's Board of Directors comprises eight members, providing a balanced governance structure designed to ensure effective oversight and strategic direction. The Board composition includes four Non-Executive Directors, one Executive Director, and three Independent Directors, including one female director, enhancing diversity and providing independent scrutiny of management decisions. This composition reflects contemporary governance best practices and ensures a healthy balance between executive leadership and independent oversight.


Members’ Profile

The Board is chaired by Mr. Ahsan Zafar Syed, the Chief Executive Officer of Engro Corporation Limited and a seasoned professional with an association spanning over three decades with the Engro Group. Mr. Syed has held several key leadership roles across the organization, including CEO of Engro Fertilizers and Engro Energy, and has been instrumental in spearheading major strategic initiatives such as the development of the EnVen fertilizer plant and the Thar coal power project. His appointment as Board Chair of EFERT underscores the strategic importance of the fertilizer business to the overall Group. Other Board members include Mr. Asad Said Jafar, a Non-Executive Director with extensive corporate leadership experience (former CEO and Board Chairman of Philips Pakistan Limited) and over three decades of professional experience. The Independent Directors bring diverse expertise and contribute to robust governance oversight.


Board Effectiveness

The Board is supported by two principal committees: the Audit Committee and the People Committee, both chaired by Independent Directors. These committees meet on a quarterly basis, with comprehensive documentation of minutes and deliberations maintained for audit and regulatory purposes. The quarterly meeting schedule ensures timely deliberation of material matters and enables the Board to respond proactively to emerging risks and opportunities. The comprehensive documentation of committee deliberations provides transparency and accountability to external stakeholders.


Financial Transparency

A.F. Ferguson & Co., Chartered Accountants, a QCR-rated audit firm on the State Bank of Pakistan's "A" category panel, has issued an unqualified opinion on the Company's financial statements for CY25. The audit firm's high rating and SBP panel status provide confidence in the reliability and integrity of the financial reporting framework.


Management
Organizational Structure

The Company has a well-defined organizational structure that is divided into fourteen main departments; (i) Marketing, (ii) Manufacturing, (iii) People Division, (iv) Digital Transformation, (v) Finance & Accounting, (vi) HSE, (vii) Information Technology, (viii) Engro Formulation, (ix) Public Affairs, (x) Central Procurement, (xi) Cenetral Treasury, (xii) Central Payables, (xiii) Operations and (xiv) Technical. Each departmental Head reports to the Chief Executive Officer (CEO), who then reports to the BoD. However, the Head of Internal Audit and HR reports administratively to the CEO and functionally to the respective BoD Committee. The Head of the Board Audit Committee has an indirect reporting line to the Head of Corporate Audit of Engro Holdings.


Management Team

Mr. Imran Ahmed was appointed as Chief Executive Officer in May 2026, following the resignation of Mr. Ali Rathore, who had assumed the position in April 2024. Mr. Ahmed brings substantial experience from his tenure within the Engro Group, having held various management positions across the organization. He is responsible for executing the Board's strategic directives and overseeing the day-to-day operations of the Company, with particular focus on navigating the current working capital challenges and executing the strategic capex program. Mr. M. Imran Khalil serves as the Chief Financial Officer, bringing over a decade of association with the Engro Group and extensive expertise in large-scale digital transformation, risk management, and project management. He is responsible for all financial, treasury, and accounting functions, as well as coordination of financial strategy with the Board and senior management team. His experience in managing complex financial transformations and optimizing capital structures is critical during the current period of elevated leverage and working capital strain. The management team's long association with the Company and the Engro Group, barring few new positions, bodes well for overall growth and continuity. The depth of experience within the management team provides confidence in the Company's ability to navigate current challenges and execute the strategic capex program.


Effectiveness

The management is assisted by four committees, i.e., Management Committee, Pricing Committee, Corporate HSE Committee, and Capex Committee. These committees are chaired by the CEO and meet on a periodic basis to ensure operational efficiency, strategic alignment, and compliance with internal policies and external regulations. The committee structure ensures that material decisions receive appropriate scrutiny and that implementation is monitored closely.


MIS

EFERT utilizes a fully integrated, real-time Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) solution developed by SAP AG Malaysia, with technical support services provided by IBM Global Services. This enterprise system enables seamless integration across functional departments, ensuring efficient data flow and informed decision-making across the organization. The ERP system provides real-time visibility into production, inventory, sales, and financial positions, enabling management to respond quickly to market changes and operational challenges.


Control Environment

The review and accountability function runs through the entire organizational structure, with regular monitoring by the internal audit function, which reports to the Board Audit Committee. This comprehensive control framework provides confidence in the reliability of financial reporting and the effectiveness of risk management.


Business Risk
Industry Dynamics

The Fertilizers industry is oligopolistic, now comprising four major players - Fauji (FFC, post the FFC-FFBL merger in Dec-24), Engro, Fatima, and Agritech. Urea and DAP remain the primary fertilizers by volume. Sector revenue grew ~10.1% YoY to ~PKR 846bln in CY25 (CY24: ~PKR 769bln), though its contribution to GDP held steady at ~0.8%. Fertilizer production eased slightly to ~9.3mln MT in CY25 (CY24: ~9.4mln MT), while offtake declined to ~9.3mln MT (CY24: ~10.0mln MT) amid softer phosphatic demand; imports fell sharply to ~0.5mln MT (CY24: ~1.2mln MT), and closing stocks rose to ~1.0mln MT (CY24: ~0.9mln MT). Urea's share of sector production moderated to ~65.6% (CY24: ~70.8%). While Pakistan remains self-sufficient in Urea, gas shortages had necessitated Urea imports in prior years; on a standalone basis, domestic urea production stood at ~6.6mln MT against offtake of ~6.7mln MT in CY25, leaving closing inventories of ~0.3mln MT and keeping reliance on imports (~0.06mln MT) minimal. Local urea prices eased ~2% YoY to ~PKR 4,448/bag (CY24: ~PKR 4,552/bag), even as import prices firmed to ~PKR 7,237/bag, preserving a wide local-import price gap. DAP remains largely import-dependent, with FFC the only major local manufacturer; ~56.5% of CY25 DAP availability was met through local production and ~36.3% through imports, with local DAP prices rising ~6% YoY to ~PKR 13,045/bag, tracking firmer international prices (~USD 701/MT, +26.8% YoY). Sector-wide working capital days stretched sharply to ~114 days (CY24: ~51 days) on a build-up in inventory (~117 days), while sector borrowings rose ~28.1% YoY to ~PKR 247bln, with the mix shifting toward long-term financing (~46.0% vs ~36.5% SPLY); interest coverage moderated to ~8.1x (CY24: ~11.9x) on the higher borrowing base. Overall, the sector's outlook remains stable, supported by recent government approval of indigenous gas allocation to select plants (FFC, Fatima, Agritech) and a planned ~USD 1.1bn coal-to-urea project in Thar (~0.7mln MT capacity), though a proposed cess on fertilizer companies remains a key regulatory risk.


Relative Position

EFert significantly strengthened its urea offtake position in CY25, achieving a share of ~34% (CY24: ~31%), translating into volumes of ~2,314mln MT against total industry urea offtake of ~6.7mln MT. EFert ranks as the second-largest urea player by offtake, though notably achieving the highest single-site throughput in the industry from its Daharki complex. In terms of urea production capacity, EFert holds ~31.9% (CY24: ~32.2%), behind FFC's ~45.4%, while Fatima accounts for the balance alongside Agritech. On an overall fertilizer basis (including DAP and other products, where EFert has no local manufacturing presence), EFert's share stood at ~20% on offtake and ~25% on production in CY25, positioning it as the second-largest player in the sector after FFC (~34% offtake, ~39% production), ahead of Fatima (~30% offtake, ~21% production) and Agritech (~5% each).


Revenues

During CY25, EFERT reported revenue of PKR 193.2bln, representing growth of 3.5% year-on-year (CY24: PKR 186.7bln), supported by higher urea offtake volumes, the Company achieved market-leading urea offtake share of ~34% in CY25 (CY24: ~31%), translating into volumes of ~2.5mln MT. Gross margin improved to ~35.4% in CY25 (CY24: ~33.0%), reflecting better cost absorption on higher production volumes and stable feedstock gas pricing at PKR 580/MMBTU. However, net profit declined to ~PKR 23.8bln (CY24: ~PKR 30.2bln), compressing net margin to ~12.3% (CY24: ~16.2%). In 1QCY26, revenue stood at PKR 26.3bln (+8.2% YoY), but net profit further compressed to ~PKR 2.9bln (net margin: ~11.0%) compared to ~PKR 3.9bln in 1QCY25 (net margin: ~16.2%), reflecting elevated finance costs (up ~31% YoY in 1QCY26) on the higher borrowing base.


Margins

Gross margin improved to ~35.4% in CY25 (CY24: ~33.0%), reflecting better cost absorption on higher volumes. Net profit nonetheless reporting at ~PKR 23.8bln (CY24: ~PKR 30.2bln), with net margin easing to ~12.3% (CY24: ~16.2%) on a higher effective tax incidence and lower non-operating income. Reflecting the softer bottom line, the full-year cash dividend was reduced to PKR 15/share (CY24: PKR 21.5/share), a cut of ~30%. In 1QCY26, standalone net profit stood at ~PKR 2.9bln (1QCY25: ~PKR 3.9bln), with net margin at ~11.0% (1QCY25: ~16.2%), even as a dividend of PKR 2.0/share was declared (1QCY25: PKR 2.25/share).


Sustainability

The Company continues to explore new avenues, particularly in pesticides and agri-farming sectors, which are expected to yield positive results in the long run. On the gas front, EFert is executing a Pressure Enhancement Facility (PEF) project at its Daharki plants, part of a broader ~USD 300mln capex program to stabilize and enhance gas pressure from the Mari gas field; Phase 1 is expected to complete by CY26, with Phase 2 progressing alongside planned outlays of ~PKR 12bln in 1QCY26.


Financial Risk
Working capital

The gross working capital cycle elongated to 105 days during Mar-26 (41 days during CY25 & 25 days during CY24). Inventory kept building through CY25, reaching ~PKR 11.2bln by Dec-25. Following an exceptionally strong Dec-25 quarter, dealer inventories built up further, and by Mar-26 the Company's standalone inventory stood at ~PKR 24.2bln, reporting the average inventory days at 61 days during Mar-26 (CY25: 22 days, CY24: 17 days). Correspondingly, standalone cash and short-term investments declined to ~PKR 17bln by Mar-26 (Dec-25: ~PKR 23bln), underscoring the continued strain on the borrowing cushion. However, trade payable days remained stable at 5 days during Mar-26 (CY25: 3 days, CY24: 3 days). Resultantly, net working capital days stood at 99 days during Mar-26 (39 days during the full year as compared to 22 days in the previous year).


Coverages

As of CY25, the Company reported FCFO of ~PKR 32bln (CY24: ~PKR 12bln). Consequently, FCFO/Finance Cost cover is reported at ~5.2x (CY24: ~3.0x). Finance costs rose further through CY25 and into 1QCY26 (up ~40% YoY in 4QCY25 and ~31% YoY in 1QCY26) on the back of higher borrowings, which is likely to have kept coverage metrics under some pressure; nonetheless, the Company's operating cash generation continues to provide reasonable headroom over debt servicing obligations.


Capitalization

EFert has a moderately-to-higher leveraged capital structure with a leveraging ratio of ~64.5% in Mar-26 (CY25: ~60% & CY24: ~42.2%) due to a significant increase in borrowings. Borrowings rose further to ~PKR 67bln by Dec-25 (CY24: ~PKR 34bln), an increase of ~97% YoY, largely to fund the elevated inventory position and ongoing capex, including the PEF project. Total standalone borrowings increased a further ~15% QoQ to ~PKR 77bln by Mar-26 (Dec-25: ~PKR 67bln), reflecting continued reliance on short-term debt to manage the seasonal inventory build. While the Company's long-term leverage remains comparatively higher, prudent management of short-term debt continues to be essential.


 
 

Jul-26

www.pacra.com


(PKR mln)


Mar-26
3M
Dec-25
12M
Dec-24
12M
Dec-23
12M
Management Audited Audited Audited
A. BALANCE SHEET
1. Non-Current Assets 107,858 97,236 88,343 83,834
2. Investments 18,348 18,661 6,006 23,703
3. Related Party Exposure 10,713 20,998 12,370 2,368
4. Current Assets 62,640 62,973 56,203 37,821
a. Inventories 24,236 11,229 12,435 5,402
b. Trade Receivables 10,869 14,200 5,687 2,069
5. Total Assets 199,560 199,868 162,922 147,727
6. Current Liabilities 78,164 87,331 70,617 77,766
a. Trade Payables 1,392 1,776 939 2,167
7. Borrowings 77,093 67,200 33,987 6,305
8. Related Party Exposure 0 0 9,168 7,274
9. Non-Current Liabilities 1,793 377 2,621 11,355
10. Net Assets 42,510 44,960 46,529 45,026
11. Shareholders' Equity 42,510 44,960 46,529 45,026
B. INCOME STATEMENT
1. Sales 26,339 193,248 186,709 161,666
a. Cost of Good Sold (16,236) (124,899) (125,171) (102,244)
2. Gross Profit 10,103 68,349 61,538 59,422
a. Operating Expenses (4,154) (24,124) (20,602) (15,707)
3. Operating Profit 5,949 44,225 40,937 43,715
a. Non Operating Income or (Expense) 228 1,563 7,865 3,154
4. Profit or (Loss) before Interest and Tax 6,177 45,788 48,802 46,869
a. Total Finance Cost (1,394) (6,050) (3,982) (1,885)
b. Taxation (1,892) (15,968) (14,613) (19,306)
6. Net Income Or (Loss) 2,891 23,771 30,207 25,678
C. CASH FLOW STATEMENT
a. Free Cash Flows from Operations (FCFO) 5,416 31,488 11,906 32,589
b. Net Cash from Operating Activities before Working Capital Changes 3,825 25,221 9,016 29,819
c. Changes in Working Capital (19,601) 4,434 (12,159) 25,296
1. Net Cash provided by Operating Activities (15,776) 29,655 (3,143) 55,115
2. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Investing Activities (999) (33,400) 5,451 (13,427)
3. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Financing Activities 9,823 12,362 (8,862) (33,703)
4. Net Cash generated or (Used) during the period (6,952) 8,617 (6,554) 7,984
D. RATIO ANALYSIS
1. Performance
a. Sales Growth (for the period) -45.5% 3.5% 15.5% 66.8%
b. Gross Profit Margin 38.4% 35.4% 33.0% 36.8%
c. Net Profit Margin 11.0% 12.3% 16.2% 15.9%
d. Cash Conversion Efficiency (FCFO adjusted for Working Capital/Sales) -53.9% 18.6% -0.1% 35.8%
e. Return on Equity [ Net Profit Margin * Asset Turnover * (Total Assets/Shareholders' Equity )] 26.4% 52.0% 66.0% 58.5%
2. Working Capital Management
a. Gross Working Capital (Average Days) 105 41 25 24
b. Net Working Capital (Average Days) 99 39 22 16
c. Current Ratio (Current Assets / Current Liabilities) 0.8 0.7 0.8 0.5
3. Coverages
a. EBITDA / Finance Cost 5.1 8.1 10.9 28.1
b. FCFO / Finance Cost+CMLTB+Excess STB 0.5 0.6 0.4 1.5
c. Debt Payback (Total Borrowings+Excess STB) / (FCFO-Finance Cost) 4.6 2.9 5.4 0.7
4. Capital Structure
a. Total Borrowings / (Total Borrowings+Shareholders' Equity) 64.5% 59.9% 42.2% 12.3%
b. Interest or Markup Payable (Days) 77.7 84.5 109.2 14.0
c. Entity Average Borrowing Rate 8.6% 10.7% 15.9% 12.9%

Jul-26

www.pacra.com

Jul-26

www.pacra.com

  1. Rating Team Statements
    1. Rating is just an opinion about the creditworthiness of the entity and does not constitute a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell any security of the entity rated or to buy, hold, or sell the security rated, as the case may be. (Chapter III; 14-3-(x))
    2. Conflict of Interest
      1. The Rating Team or any of their family members have no interest in this rating (Chapter III; 12-2-(j))
      2. PACRA, the analysts involved in the rating process, and members of its rating committee and their family members do not have any conflict of interest relating to the rating done by them (Chapter III; 12-2-(e) & (k))
      3. The analyst is not a substantial shareholder of the customer being rated by PACRA [Annexure F; d-(ii)]
      4. Explanation: for the purpose of the above clause, the term "family members" shall include only those family members who are dependent on the analyst and members of the rating committee.
  2. Restrictions
    1. No director, officer, or employee of PACRA communicates the information acquired by him for use for rating purposes to any other person, except where required under law to do so. (Chapter III; 10-(5))
    2. PACRA does not disclose or discuss with outside parties or make improper use of the non-public information which has come to its knowledge during a business relationship with the customer. (Chapter III; 10-7-(d))
    3. PACRA does not make proposals or recommendations regarding the activities of rated entities that could impact a credit rating of the entity subject to rating. (Chapter III; 10-7-(k))
  3. Conduct of Business
    1. PACRA fulfills its obligations in a fair, efficient, transparent, and ethical manner and renders high standards of services in performing its functions and obligations. (Chapter III; 11-A-(a))
    2. PACRA uses due care in the preparation of this Rating Report. Our information has been obtained from sources we consider to be reliable, but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. PACRA does not, in every instance, independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing this Rating Report. (Clause 11-(A)(p))
    3. PACRA prohibits its employees and analysts from soliciting money, gifts, or favors from anyone with whom PACRA conducts business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(q))
    4. PACRA ensures before the commencement of the rating process that an analyst or employee has not had a recent employment or other significant business or personal relationship with the rated entity that may cause or may be perceived as causing a conflict of interest. (Chapter III; 11-A-(r))
    5. PACRA maintains the principle of integrity in seeking rating business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(u))
    6. PACRA promptly investigates in the event of misconduct or a breach of the policies, procedures, and controls, and takes appropriate steps to rectify any weaknesses to prevent any recurrence, along with suitable punitive action against the responsible employee(s). (Chapter III; 11-B-(m))
  4. Independence & Conflict of Interest
    1. PACRA receives compensation from the entity being rated or any third party for the rating services it offers. The receipt of this compensation has no influence on PACRA’s opinions or other analytical processes. In all instances, PACRA is committed to preserving the objectivity, integrity, and independence of its ratings. Our relationship is governed by two distinct mandates: i) rating mandate - signed with the entity being rated or issuer of the debt instrument, and ii) fee mandate - signed with the payer, which can be different from the entity.
    2. PACRA does not provide consultancy/advisory services or other services to any of its customers or their associated companies and associated undertakings that are being rated or have been rated by it during the preceding three years, unless it has an adequate mechanism in place ensuring that the provision of such services does not lead to a conflict of interest situation with its rating activities. (Chapter III; 12-2-(d))
    3. PACRA discloses that no shareholder directly or indirectly holding 10% or more of the share capital of PACRA also holds directly or indirectly 10% or more of the share capital of the entity which is subject to rating or the entity which issued the instrument subject to rating by PACRA. (Chapter III; 12-2-(f))
    4. PACRA ensures that the rating assigned to an entity or instrument is not affected by the existence of a business relationship between PACRA and the entity or any other party, or the non-existence of such a relationship. (Chapter III; 12-2-(i))
    5. PACRA ensures that the analysts or any of their family members shall not buy, sell, or engage in any transaction in any security which falls in the analyst’s area of primary analytical responsibility. This clause, however, does not apply to investments in securities through collective investment schemes. (Chapter III; 12-2-(l))
    6. PACRA has established policies and procedures governing investments and trading in securities by its employees and for monitoring the same to prevent insider trading, market manipulation, or any other market abuse. (Chapter III; 11-B-(g))
  5. Monitoring and Review
    1. PACRA monitors all the outstanding ratings continuously, and any potential change therein due to any event associated with the issuer, the security arrangement, the industry, etc., is disseminated to the market immediately and in an effective manner after appropriate consultation with the entity/issuer. (Chapter III; 17-(a))
    2. PACRA reviews all the outstanding ratings periodically on an annual basis. Provided that public dissemination of annual review and in an instance of change in rating will be made. (Chapter III; 17-(b))
    3. PACRA initiates an immediate review of the outstanding rating upon becoming aware of any information that may reasonably be expected to result in downgrading of the rating. (Chapter III; 17-(c))
    4. PACRA engages with the issuer and the debt securities trustee to remain updated on all information pertaining to the rating of the entity/instrument. (Chapter III; 17-(d))
  6. Probability of Default
    1. PACRA’s Rating Scale reflects the expectation of credit risk. The highest rating has the lowest relative likelihood of default (i.e., probability). PACRA’s transition studies capture the historical performance behavior of a specific rating notch. Transition behavior of the assigned rating can be obtained from PACRA’s Transition Study available at our website. (www.pacra.com) However, the actual transition of rating may not follow the pattern observed in the past. (Chapter III; 14-3(f)(vii))
  7. Proprietary Information
    1. All information contained herein is considered proprietary by PACRA. Hence, none of the information in this document can be copied or otherwise reproduced, stored, or disseminated in whole or in part in any form or by any means whatsoever by any person without PACRA’s prior written consent.

Jul-26

www.pacra.com