Rating History
Dissemination Date Long-Term Rating Short-Term Rating Outlook Action Rating Watch
24-Jun-26 BBB+ A2 Stable Maintain -
27-Jun-25 BBB+ A2 Stable Upgrade -
27-Jun-24 BBB A2 Stable Initial -
About the Entity

RCDP is a not-for-profit, public unlisted company incorporated in 2015 under Section 42 of the repealed Companies Ordinance, 1984. Its roots trace back to 1996 through the Rural Community Development Society, reflecting a long-standing commitment to rural development. The Company is governed by an eight-member Board chaired by Ms. Ayesha Gulzar, while Mr. Muhammad Murtaza serves as CEO. Headquartered in Lahore, RCDP operates 252 branches under its SECP license and conducts training programs to strengthen economic resilience within underserved communities.

Rating Rationale

The assigned ratings reflect Rural Community Development Programmes ("RCDP" or "the Company") established franchise within Pakistan's microfinance sector, underpinned by a mission-oriented business model centered on financial inclusion, rural penetration, and women empowerment. The Company's branch footprint expanded to 232 conventional branches and 20 Prime Minister Interest Free Loan (PMIFL) branches as of Mar'26 (Mar'25: 160 conventional and 32 PMIFL branches), supported by an experienced management team and sustained borrower accretion. As of 9MFY26, RCDP's Gross Loan Portfolio increased by 58% to PKR 17,418mln (9MFY25: PKR 11,081mln), reflecting robust portfolio scaling driven by deeper market penetration and persistent demand for microfinance products. The borrower base increased to 340,653 as of Mar'26 (Mar'25: 245,255), with female and rural borrowers representing 98% and 63% of the portfolio, respectively, reinforcing the Company's distinct positioning within the financial inclusion ecosystem. Financial performance remained satisfactory during 9MFY26. Total financial income increased by 20% to PKR 4,545mln (9MFY25: PKR 3,797mln), primarily comprising markup income of PKR 3,875mln, up 19% (9MFY25: PKR 3,245mln), and loan processing fee income of PKR 670mln, up 21% (9MFY25: PKR 551mln). Finance cost increased by 18% to PKR 1,193mln (9MFY25: PKR 1,015mln) owing to higher borrowings mobilized to support portfolio expansion, while provisioning charges rose sharply by 167% to PKR 217mln (9MFY25: PKR 81mln) commensurate with portfolio growth. Operating expenses increased by 39% to PKR 2,758mln (9MFY25: PKR 1,978mln), primarily attributable to branch network expansion and administrative costs associated with increased operating scale. Resultantly, the Company reported a net surplus of PKR 623mln during 9MFY26, down 29% (9MFY25: PKR 882mln). The equity base strengthened to PKR 5,626mln as of 9MFY26, up 18% (9MFY25: PKR 4,778mln), supported by internal capital generation, enhancing loss absorption capacity and financial flexibility. The Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR) stood at 28.36% as of Mar'26 (Mar'25: 38.8%), reflecting higher leverage deployed to fund portfolio growth, while remaining comfortably above the regulatory threshold. RCDP's liquidity profile remains adequate, supported by cash and bank balances of PKR 2,813mln, up 35% (9MFY25: PKR 2,082mln), and a diversified funding mix comprising long-term borrowings and institutional funding lines. The Company continues to maintain a prudent asset-liability management framework to support its expanding operations. Credit risk indicators remain manageable, with established underwriting disciplines, portfolio surveillance mechanisms, and provisioning buffers supporting overall asset quality. The Company has a well-articulated risk management framework and operational control environment. Governance and oversight remain satisfactory. The Board provides strategic direction through established governance structures, while independent Risk Management, Compliance, and Internal Audit functions support effective internal controls and enterprise-wide risk oversight. The Company maintains structured policies and procedures across lending, recovery, and monitoring functions, fostering operational rigor and institutional sustainability.

Key Rating Drivers

The ratings are dependent on the Company's ability to sustain portfolio growth, asset quality, capitalization, profitability, and sound liquidity and leverage management.

Profile
Structure

RCDP was established on November 3, 2015, as a non-profit organization under Section 42 of the Companies Ordinance, 1984. Its core objective is to provide cost-effective microfinance services to underserved individuals, thereby promoting their inclusion in economic activities and contributing to sustainable community development.


Background

RCDP emerged as an independent entity following its separation from the Rural Community Development Society (RCDS), which was established in 1995 under the Societies Registration Act, XXI of 1860, to deliver integrated development services across Punjab. In 2016, RCDS restructured its operations to align with regulatory requirements, leading to the formation of RCDP to oversee microfinance activities, while RCDS continued to focus on social development programs. RCDP now operates under a license from the Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan (SECP) as a Non-Banking Finance Company (NBFC), with its license renewed in October 2022 to continue providing investment finance and microfinance-related services.


Operations

RCDP's core mandate is to provide microfinance services to the underbanked population, with a particular focus on rural communities, to strengthen their economic participation. In addition to financial services, the Company is also committed to offering training and education to its clients, empowering them with the knowledge and skills necessary for sustainable growth. RCDP operates an extensive network of 232 conventional branches and 20 Prime Minister's Interest-Free Loan (PMIFL) branches, serving various districts across Punjab. The product suite remains diversified across microenterprise, agriculture, housing, and social financing segments, including CED, BEL, EDF, SME, livestock financing, PMIFL, ACAG housing finance, PMYBL youth lending, gold loans, and renewable energy products, supporting risk dispersion while enabling deeper penetration into underserved borrower segments. RCDP has also launched a Shariah-compliant financing product based on Murabaha, structured on sale-based principles. Under this arrangement, the customer procures the asset on the Company’s behalf, after which the Murabaha transaction is executed at cost plus an agreed profit margin. The product has been developed with technical assistance from Meezan Bank Limited and is supported by Shariah advisory oversight from Alhamd Shariah Advisory Services. Simultaneously, RCDP is advancing a comprehensive Islamic transition roadmap, with a conversion plan already submitted to the SECP that covers lending, funding, operational workflows, and stakeholder engagements. Dedicated Islamic banking operations have been established in key regions, including Jhelum, Rawalpindi, and Attock, with further branch expansion planned.


Ownership
Ownership Structure

RCDP is incorporated as a company limited by guarantee without share capital, indicating its not-for-profit nature and commitment to reinvesting resources toward its developmental objectives. In the absence of share capital, the Company's capitalization is anchored entirely in accumulated reserves and donor support, including a Loan Revolving Fund, Building Reserve, General Fund, Special Reserve, and Equity Donations, with the Loan Revolving Fund remaining the largest component, reinforcing internal capacity to finance the expanding microfinance portfolio.


Stability

RCDP's stability is underpinned by a highly experienced and diverse Board of Directors, ensuring strong governance and strategic direction. The Board composition has remained stable, with no material changes, resignations, or reconstitution observed over the recent review period, and is in line with SECP requirements for governance structure.


Business Acumen

RCDP demonstrates sound business acumen through its strategic focus on serving underserved and rural populations with tailored microfinance solutions. The management team possesses deep expertise in microfinance operations, regulatory compliance, and social impact initiatives. The organization's decision to restructure as a Non-Banking Finance Company (NBFC) under SECP regulation reflects its forward-looking approach and adaptability to changing regulatory landscapes. RCDP's ability to sustain operations across a wide network of branches, combined with its integration of capacity-building programs for clients and staff, indicates a strong understanding of both financial sustainability and community development. Its balanced approach between financial prudence and social mission underscores effective leadership and sectoral insight, further evidenced by its early-stage transition toward Shariah-compliant financing through a Murabaha-based product developed with technical support from Meezan Bank Limited and Shariah advisory oversight from Alhamd Shariah Advisory Services, alongside a broader Islamic transition roadmap submitted to SECP covering lending, funding, and operational processes.


Financial Strength

While the sponsors possess adequate financial strength, the sustained growth of RCDP is closely tied to their continued ability to mobilize capital through donations and other forms of sponsor support. This capacity to attract external funding remains a critical driver of the organization's expansion and long-term sustainability, complemented by consistent internal capital generation through retained earnings, which has supported a steady increase in the Company's reserve base and provided headroom for continued portfolio growth.


Governance
Board Structure

The Company's Board of Directors (BoD) comprises eight members, including three independent directors, four non-executive directors, and the CEO as an executive director:


1. Ms. Ayesha Gulzar (Chairperson / Non-Executive Director)

2. Mr. Muhammad Murtaza (CEO / Executive Director)

3. Ms. Umm-e-Kalsoom (Independent Director)

4. Ms. Arooj Javed (Independent Director)

5. Mr. Muhammad Asim (Independent Director)

6. Mr. Safdar Ali Malik (Non-Executive Director)

7. Mr. Naeem Shahid (Non-Executive Director)

8. Mr. Mubarak Ali Sarwar (Non-Executive Director) 


Members’ Profile

RCDP's Board benefits from the directors' extensive and diverse experience, which offers sharp strategic insight across financial, developmental, and operational domains. Chairperson Ms. Ayesha Gulzar is a management consultant and Master Trainer with two decades of international experience, holding an MIS degree from the University of Connecticut and leadership training from Yale and Oxford University. Independent director Ms. Umm-e-Kalsoom brings 12 years of managerial experience across national and international development organizations, with an M.Phil in Anthropology from Quaid-i-Azam University, while fellow independent director Ms. Arooj Javed has 12 years of experience in educational leadership, currently serving as curriculum coordinator and master trainer at the Progressive Education Network, holding a Master's in Social Sciences from Punjab University. Mr. Muhammad Asim, also an independent director, brings 14 years of grassroots development experience focused on community and women empowerment, having served as District Head for Oxfam GB, Oxfam Hong Kong, and Punjab-based development organizations. Among the non-executive directors, Mr. Safdar Ali Malik is a Chartered Accountant with an MBA in Finance & Accounts, bringing over two decades of financial leadership experience, including nine years as Head of Finance and Accounts in the sugar industry; Mr. Naeem Shahid has an 18-year track record in business execution, holding an MBA in Information Technology from BZU along with specialized certification in Managing Across Cultures; and Mr. Mubarak Ali Sarwar brings nearly three decades of social development experience, having founded AGAHE in 2004, which has delivered over 250 projects across education, health, microfinance, and climate resilience. CEO Mr. Muhammad Murtaza, serving as the Executive Director, brings 30 years of experience and has been with the group since 1998, providing institutional continuity and operational leadership.


Board Effectiveness

To maintain a strong control environment and ensure full compliance with relevant reporting standards, the Company has established three dedicated board committees: (i) the Audit Committee, (ii) the Risk Management Committee, and (iii) the Human Resource and Remuneration Committee. These committees play a vital role in strengthening corporate governance and supporting the board in fulfilling its key oversight responsibilities. Notably, the Audit Committee and the Human Resource and Remuneration Committee are chaired by independent directors.


Transparency

Ilyas Saeed & Company Chartered Accountants are the external auditors of the Company. The firm is in the A Category of SBP's panel of auditors and is also QCR-rated, and has issued an unmodified and unqualified opinion on RCDP's FY25 financial statements with no emphasis-of-matter paragraph noted. Furthermore, the Company also has an internal audit department for a greater control framework. The last onsite review by SECP was conducted in March 2026, with no major findings reported and a satisfactory overall outcome, indicating continued compliance with applicable regulatory requirements and operational standards.


Management
Organizational Structure

The Company has established a well-structured organizational framework. Its key departments include: (i) Risk, (ii) Operations, (iii) Finance, (iv) Internal Audit, (v) IT, (vi) Communication and Research, (vii) HR, (viii) Administration, (ix) Accounts, (x) Business Affairs, and (xi) Compliance. All departmental managers and heads are appointed and report directly to the CEO, except for the Internal Audit department, which reports directly to the Audit Committee.


Management Team

RCDP's management team comprises seasoned professionals with strong expertise across key operational and strategic functions. Led by Founder and CEO Mr. Muhammad Murtaza, who brings over 30 years of development sector experience and holds a Law degree along with Harvard Business School leadership training, the team includes Mr. Muhammad Imran Khokar as Head of Accounts, a co-founder associated with the organization since 2001 with an MBA in Finance. Mr. Rashid Ahmed serves as Head of HR & Company Secretary, bringing over 25 years of experience since joining in 2005, while Mr. Muhammad Imran Malik, a Fellow Member of ICAP, heads the Audit function with over 20 years of experience since 2004. Mr. Usman Malik leads Finance, having progressed from Credit Officer since 2005, and Mr. Shamim Haider heads Risk Management with 19 years of experience since joining in 2008. Mr. Shahid Mehmood, an ACCA member with 22 years in microfinance, heads Operations, while Mr. Asif Hussain, a World Bank certified trainer, leads Compliance since 2016. Mr. Ghulam Haider has headed Business Affairs for over 18 years, and Mr. Shahzad Manzoor leads Trainings and Administration since 2006 and 2014, respectively. Rounding out the team, Mr. Musharaf Mehmood Khan heads Innovation & System Development with over 22 years of microfinance banking experience, and Mr. Muhammad Tahseen Shahzad leads Information Technology, having built RCDP's IT function since joining as a Credit Officer in 2003. Most members have been with the organization for over a decade, ensuring stability, institutional knowledge, and strong operational continuity.


Effectiveness

The Company has constituted four management committees, namely the (i) Asset and Liability Committee (ALCO), (ii) Portfolio Management Committee (PMC), (iii) HR & Remuneration Committee, and (iv) IT Steering Committee. The Company's management, including the CEO, has a practice of conducting monthly review meetings to assess RCDP's performance and take action on any items highlighted. Internal audit, compliance, and risk departments also present their reports during the meeting, which are deliberated upon, and issues that are highlighted are then addressed.


MIS

RCDP utilizes a Smart MIS system to ensure accuracy, transparency, and real-time tracking throughout the loan process. Once the credit officer submits a completed loan application file, the accounts officer inputs the data into the MIS for initial verification. This centralized system streamlines client information management, supports risk assessment, and enables seamless coordination between departments for appraisals, approvals, disbursement, and follow-ups. On the disbursement and collections side, RCDP operates a digitally controlled X-PIN based mechanism, whereby approved clients receive system-generated codes following final MIS validation, reducing manual cash-handling risk and strengthening maker-checker controls; repayments remain integrated with branchless banking partner channels, enabling structured collection routing and timely reconciliation. The MIS also serves as a reliable tool for monitoring loan performance, with enhanced portfolio dashboards, delinquency aging views, and branch performance tracking that have become increasingly important in managing a scaled network, and is integrated with NADRA for identity verification and with credit bureaus for assessing borrower credit history.


Risk Management framework

The Company has Risk Management and Compliance departments which perform regular ‘surprise’ visits to branches to asses multiple risk and compliance parameters. The risk department targets higher-risk branches with greater frequency than the branches which are low-risk. The product parameters are in place which governs the maximum limit of exposure for a client for each product, and also whether a product may be offered to a new client or not. The Company has a policy of the risk department verifying and approving 100% of cases before disbursements no matter the amount. Furthermore, there is a Risk Management Committee (RMC) at the Board level while a risk management manual is also present.


Technology Infrastructure

RCDP has a software sourced from Generic Solutions which allows for real-time report generation. The software encompasses all relevant areas of the Company, and shows information such as NPLs, at-risk portfolio, number of clients, number of disbursements, outstanding OLPs and overdue clients, among other details. RCDP is in the process of deploying its mobile application to all its branches, enabling centralized monitoring and geo-tagging of customers. The underlying IT infrastructure also includes system access controls, centralized monitoring, data backup protocols, and disaster recovery arrangements, supporting management's gradual transition toward a hybrid model that combines physical outreach with digital enablement to improve operational efficiency and customer experience without eliminating the branch network.


Business Risk
Industry Dynamics

Pakistan's Microfinance Institutions (MFIs) segment exhibited strong growth, with Gross Loan Portfolio (GLP) rising sharply to PKR 204.0bln in FY25 (FY24: PKR 113.4bln), up approximately 80% YoY, and momentum continued into 1HFY26 with GLP reaching PKR 308.0bln, a further 51% increase. This surge was largely driven by higher disbursements in housing finance, supported by Punjab-based government schemes, which also pushed the average loan size up sharply to PKR 60,684 in FY25 (FY24: PKR 40,500) and further to PKR 87,866 in 1HFY26. Despite this rapid portfolio expansion, asset quality remained resilient, with the infection ratio improving to 1.1% in FY25 (FY24: 1.3%) and further declining to 0.9% in 1HFY26, reflecting the structured group-lending model and low-risk rural borrower base typical of MFIs. However, borrowings rose steadily to PKR 61.4bln in FY25 and further to PKR 69.4bln in 1HFY26, underscoring growing reliance on external funding to sustain portfolio growth. Profitability remained healthy, with Operational Self Sufficiency at 107.7% in FY25, though it moderated to 102.2% in 1HFY26, while ROE softened to 15.4% from 23.1% in FY25, reflecting the impact of scaling costs against rapid growth. More broadly, Pakistan's non-banking microfinance sector — comprising standalone MFIs operating alongside microfinance banks, saw its gross loan portfolio expand by approximately 119.5% to PKR 308.0bln in CY25, with the active borrower base rising to 3.6mln (CY24: 3.1mln); sector-wide capital adequacy stood at 17.5%, with PAR >30 days at 6.0%, underscoring a sector that continues to demonstrate strong growth momentum alongside a continued need to monitor asset quality and funding risks at the system level.


Relative Position

As of 9MFY26, RCDP reported a Gross Loan Portfolio (GLP) of approximately PKR 17,418mln, up 58% YoY (9MFY25: PKR 11,081mln), reflecting strong lending operations and growing outreach within the microfinance sector. This positions the Company with an estimated market share of around 3% based on the total GLP of microcredit institutions across the country. RCDP's branch network of 252 branches and active borrower base exceeding 340,000 reflect an operational footprint that compares favourably against peer standalone MFIs, several of which operate on a structured group-lending model; RCDP, by contrast, maintains an entirely individual-based lending model with EMI-based repayment across nearly the full portfolio, a structure that supports more granular credit assessment at the borrower level even as it requires correspondingly more intensive field monitoring as the borrower base scales.


Revenue

As of 9MFY26, RCDP generated total financial income of approximately PKR 4,545mln, up 20% YoY (9MFY25: PKR 3,797mln). This growth was primarily driven by a 39% increase in the active borrower base to 340,653 (9MFY25: 245,225) and the Company's expanded outreach through branch network growth (232 conventional branches as of Mar'26 versus 160 a year earlier). The resulting increase in loan disbursements led to higher markup income, which rose 19% to PKR 3,875mln (9MFY25: PKR 3,245mln), and higher loan processing fee income, which rose 21% to PKR 670mln (9MFY25: PKR 551mln), together forming the core of RCDP's revenue stream. The Credit and Enterprise Development product continued to be the largest contributor to the Gross Loan Portfolio at roughly half of the book, followed by the Business Enhancement Loan and a sharply expanding Apni Chhat Apna Ghar Home Loan portfolio, indicating sustained demand across both core and newer product lines; gold-backed lending and PMYBL youth financing have likewise grown from a negligible base to a combined high single-digit share of GLP over the past two years, reflecting management's calibrated push into secured and socially-oriented products. The Company also introduced Islamic Financing Murabaha during the period, reaching a gross portfolio of PKR 176mln as of 9MFY26, reflecting RCDP's strategic diversification into Shariah-compliant microfinance products to broaden its outreach and product suite, a transition that has been supported by dedicated Islamic operations established in select regions and a formal conversion roadmap submitted to the regulator.


Profitability

As of 9MFY26, RCDP's net surplus stood at PKR 623mln, with the decline from PKR 882mln in 9MFY25 reflecting the Company's continued investment in scaling its operations. Total financial income grew by a healthy 20% YoY to PKR 4,545mln (9MFY25: PKR 3,797mln), driven by strong growth in markup income and loan processing fees on the back of an expanding borrower base and branch network. The moderation in net surplus is largely attributable to higher finance costs (up 18% to PKR 1,193mln) and increased provisioning (up to PKR 217mln), both of which are consistent with the Company's substantial portfolio growth of 58% YoY and its proactive approach to risk coverage amid rapid scale-up. Importantly, Financial Self Sufficiency strengthened to 106.9% (9MFY25: 89.4%), reflecting an improved underlying capacity to cover both financial and operating costs from core operating income. This trajectory supports the view that RCDP's profitability fundamentals remain sound, with near-term cost absorption tied to its expanding outreach, even as rising operating costs linked to branch network expansion, programme scale-up, and inflation-linked overheads are likely to continue exerting pressure over the near term. Notably, the Company's tax-exempt status as a non-profit entity under the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 continues to provide a structural, positive impact on the bottom line that is not available to for-profit microfinance peers.


Sustainability

The Company's sustainability is supported by its planned expansion of the branch network into underserved areas, enhancing outreach and access to financial services. Concurrently, investments in technology such as digital loan processing and data systems are expected to improve operational efficiency and scalability. These initiatives position the organization to sustainably serve a broader population while maintaining its developmental mandate. Over the medium term, revenue generation is anticipated to strengthen further, supported by enhanced access to external funding sources and continued branch footprint expansion; however, as the portfolio grows in size, a sustained focus on asset quality will remain essential to limit delinquency risks and uphold sound credit practices, particularly as operating costs are expected to rise alongside the Company's increasing scale and outreach.


Financial Risk
Credit Risk

RCDP maintains a sound and stable credit risk profile, underpinned by granular exposure, absence of borrower concentration, and prudent risk management practices. As of 9MFY26, the Portfolio at Risk (PAR 30) registered an uptick to 0.8% (9MFY25: 0.4%), reflecting the impact of rapid portfolio growth and a larger borrower base, though it remains at a low absolute level given the scale of expansion undertaken during the period. Non-performing loans (NPLs) stood at PKR 182mln, with write-offs amounting to only PKR 1.1mln as of 9MFY26, highlighting continued effective recovery and collection mechanisms despite the significant scale-up in disbursements. The write-off ratio improved to 0.29% (9MFY25: 0.42%), reinforcing this trend. The portfolio remains substantially unsecured and individual-based, although the secured share has been rising steadily, from near-zero in FY24 to over 15% of GLP by 9MFY26, driven primarily by gold-backed and housing-linked exposures, a development consistent with management's stated objective of building a relatively more secure borrower mix alongside continued portfolio scaling. Overall, the asset quality metrics continue to point to sound underwriting practices and a well-diversified loan book, with no indication of concentration risk or large exposure vulnerabilities, even as the modest uptick in PAR 30 warrants continued monitoring given the pace of growth.


Market Risk

RCDP maintains a conservative investment strategy, primarily placing funds in short-term bank deposits. As of 9MFY26, total short-term investments stood at PKR 609mln, up 70% YoY (9MFY25: PKR 359mln), reflecting an increase in conservatively placed liquidity alongside the Company's broader balance sheet growth. These placements continue to be held with well-rated commercial banks, including NBP and JS Bank, which helps mitigate credit risk. The short-term nature of these deposits limits exposure to market fluctuations; however, changes in interest rates can influence the income earned from these placements, making interest rate trends an important consideration for future investment decisions, particularly given the prevailing declining interest rate environment, which has already contributed to a moderation in portfolio yield even as funding costs have declined in tandem.


Funding

RCDP's primary source of funding continues to be the Pakistan Microfinance Investment Company (PMIC), with the sanctioned limit further enhanced to PKR 6.1bln as of Mar'26 (Mar'25: PKR 4bln), reflecting growing confidence in the Company's operational and financial performance. As of 9MFY26, total borrowings reached approximately PKR 16,166mln, up 83% YoY (9MFY25: PKR 8,833mln), marking a substantial increase in financial capacity to support the Company's rapid portfolio growth and outreach objectives. The funding base has also diversified during the period, with new facilities added from Triple Jump TF (PKR 1,405mln) and Enabling Qapital (PKR 1,122mln), alongside expanded lines from National Bank of Pakistan, Allied Bank, and JS Bank, reducing reliance on any single institutional source; this growing roster of local and foreign lenders compares favourably against the funding profile typical of standalone MFIs, where reliance on borrowings, in the absence of deposit-taking capability, remains a structural feature of the business model. This notable expansion in borrowings, however, has also resulted in a higher gearing ratio, underscoring the trade-off between funding growth and increased leverage during the period.


Cashflows & Coverages

RCDP’s liquidity profile remained adequate during 9MFY26, supported by cash and bank balances of approximately PKR 2.8bln and short-term investments of PKR 609mln as of Mar’26. The Company continued to maintain a comfortable current ratio of 3.2x (Jun’25: 2.7x), reflecting its ability to meet short-term obligations through a strong stock of liquid assets. Operating cash flows remained negative at PKR 4.2bln during 9MFY26, primarily due to substantial growth in the microfinance loan portfolio, which absorbed liquidity as disbursements outpaced recoveries. Nevertheless, the funding requirement arising from portfolio expansion was adequately supported through fresh borrowings of PKR 5.5bln, enabling the Company to sustain growth while preserving liquidity buffers. Consequently, cash and cash equivalents remained at a healthy level of PKR 3.4bln at period-end. Coverage indicators remained satisfactory despite an increase in funding costs associated with balance sheet expansion. The Company generated operating earnings (before finance costs and provisioning) of approximately PKR 3.35bln against finance costs of PKR 1.19bln during 9MFY26, translating into an interest coverage ratio of around 2.8x. The improvement in earnings generation, driven by higher markup income from an expanding loan portfolio, continued to support debt-servicing capacity and provides comfort regarding the Company’s ability to absorb financing costs while maintaining profitability. Overall, coverage metrics remain commensurate with the Company’s current risk profile and growth trajectory.


Capital Adequacy

RCDP continues to maintain an adequate capitalization profile, providing a sound buffer against potential credit losses and supporting future business growth. As of 9MFY26, the Company's Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR) stood at 28.36% (9MFY25: 38.8%), remaining comfortably above the minimum regulatory requirement despite the substantial expansion in the loan portfolio during the period. The decline in CAR primarily reflects higher risk-weighted assets associated with accelerated portfolio growth rather than any weakening in the Company's capital base. Internal capital generation remained positive, with total funds increasing to PKR 5.6bln as of Mar'26 (Jun'25: PKR 5.0bln), supported by a net surplus of PKR 623mln. Meanwhile, the gearing ratio remained manageable at 1.98x (FY25: 2.03x), indicating a balanced funding structure and a modest reduction in leverage. Capitalization remains anchored almost entirely in accumulated reserves, the Loan Revolving Fund, Building Reserve, General Fund, Special Reserve, and Equity Donations, given the Company's incorporation as a company limited by guarantee without share capital; this reserve-based capital structure has shown consistent growth over years, underpinned by steady accretion of retained earnings. Overall, the Company's capitalization levels continue to provide sufficient capacity to absorb unforeseen losses while supporting its growth objectives and maintaining financial stability.


 
 

Jun-26

www.pacra.com


(PKR mln)


Mar-26
9M
Jun-25
12M
Jun-24
12M
Jun-23
12M
Management Audited Audited Audited
A. BALANCE SHEET
1. Total Finances 18,066 12,279 9,439 8,142
2. Investments 609 637 300 400
3. Other Earning Assets 1,644 913 374 161
4. Non-Earning Assets 3,147 3,154 1,073 899
5. Non-Performing Finances (648) (566) (459) (395)
Total Assets 22,818 16,417 10,727 9,207
6. Deposits 0 0 0 0
7. Borrowings 16,316 10,474 6,235 5,802
8. Other Liabilities (Non-Interest Bearing) 875 940 596 365
Total Liabilities 17,192 11,414 6,832 6,167
Equity 5,620 5,003 3,896 3,040
B. INCOME STATEMENT
1. Mark Up Earned 3,875 4,341 3,767 3,505
2. Mark Up Expensed (1,193) (1,195) (1,524) (1,239)
3. Non Mark Up Income 918 1,150 966 108
Total Income 3,599 4,296 3,208 2,373
4. Non-Mark Up Expenses (2,758) (3,044) (2,269) (1,624)
5. Provisions/Write offs/Reversals (218) (144) (91) (274)
Pre-Tax Profit 623 1,107 849 475
6. Taxes 0 0 0 0
Profit After Tax 623 1,107 849 475
C. RATIO ANALYSIS
1. Performance
Portfolio Yield 39.7% 46.3% 50.7% 43.6%
Minimum Lending Rate 36.4% 40.0% 43.8% 37.6%
Operational Self Sufficiency (OSS) 109.0% 121.0% 114.8% 113.2%
Return on Equity 15.6% 24.9% 24.5% 17.1%
Cost per Borrower Ratio 12,063.4 11,319.8 11,090.6 8,360.6
2. Capital Adequacy
Net NPL/Equity -11.5% -11.3% -11.8% -13.0%
Equity / Total Assets (D+E+F) 24.6% 30.5% 36.3% 33.0%
Tier I Capital / Risk Weighted Assets 28.4% 36.1% 39.1% 35.7%
Capital Adequacy Ratio 28.4% 36.1% 39.1% 35.7%
Capital Formation Rate [(Profit After Tax - Cash Dividend ) / Equity] 16.6% 28.4% 27.9% 18.9%
3. Funding & Liquidity
Liquid Assets as a % of Deposits & Short term Borrowings N/A N/A N/A N/A
Demand Deposit Coverage Ratio N/A N/A N/A N/A
Liquid Assets/Top 20 Depositors N/A N/A N/A N/A
Funding Diversification (Deposits/(Deposits+Borrowings+Grants)) 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Net Advances to Deposits Ratio N/A N/A N/A N/A
4. Credit Risk
Top 20 Advances / Advances 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
PAR 30 Ratio 0.8% 0.1% 0.1% 0.2%
Write Off Ratio 0.0% 0.3% 0.0% 2.8%
True Infection Ratio 0.8% 0.4% 0.1% 2.8%
Risk Coverage Ratio (PAR 30) 522.7% 3210.0% 3495.7% 3129.8%

Jun-26

www.pacra.com

Jun-26

www.pacra.com

  1. Rating Team Statements
    1. Rating is just an opinion about the creditworthiness of the entity and does not constitute a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell any security of the entity rated or to buy, hold, or sell the security rated, as the case may be. (Chapter III; 14-3-(x))
    2. Conflict of Interest
      1. The Rating Team or any of their family members have no interest in this rating (Chapter III; 12-2-(j))
      2. PACRA, the analysts involved in the rating process, and members of its rating committee and their family members do not have any conflict of interest relating to the rating done by them (Chapter III; 12-2-(e) & (k))
      3. The analyst is not a substantial shareholder of the customer being rated by PACRA [Annexure F; d-(ii)]
      4. Explanation: for the purpose of the above clause, the term "family members" shall include only those family members who are dependent on the analyst and members of the rating committee.
  2. Restrictions
    1. No director, officer, or employee of PACRA communicates the information acquired by him for use for rating purposes to any other person, except where required under law to do so. (Chapter III; 10-(5))
    2. PACRA does not disclose or discuss with outside parties or make improper use of the non-public information which has come to its knowledge during a business relationship with the customer. (Chapter III; 10-7-(d))
    3. PACRA does not make proposals or recommendations regarding the activities of rated entities that could impact a credit rating of the entity subject to rating. (Chapter III; 10-7-(k))
  3. Conduct of Business
    1. PACRA fulfills its obligations in a fair, efficient, transparent, and ethical manner and renders high standards of services in performing its functions and obligations. (Chapter III; 11-A-(a))
    2. PACRA uses due care in the preparation of this Rating Report. Our information has been obtained from sources we consider to be reliable, but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. PACRA does not, in every instance, independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing this Rating Report. (Clause 11-(A)(p))
    3. PACRA prohibits its employees and analysts from soliciting money, gifts, or favors from anyone with whom PACRA conducts business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(q))
    4. PACRA ensures before the commencement of the rating process that an analyst or employee has not had a recent employment or other significant business or personal relationship with the rated entity that may cause or may be perceived as causing a conflict of interest. (Chapter III; 11-A-(r))
    5. PACRA maintains the principle of integrity in seeking rating business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(u))
    6. PACRA promptly investigates in the event of misconduct or a breach of the policies, procedures, and controls, and takes appropriate steps to rectify any weaknesses to prevent any recurrence, along with suitable punitive action against the responsible employee(s). (Chapter III; 11-B-(m))
  4. Independence & Conflict of Interest
    1. PACRA receives compensation from the entity being rated or any third party for the rating services it offers. The receipt of this compensation has no influence on PACRA’s opinions or other analytical processes. In all instances, PACRA is committed to preserving the objectivity, integrity, and independence of its ratings. Our relationship is governed by two distinct mandates: i) rating mandate - signed with the entity being rated or issuer of the debt instrument, and ii) fee mandate - signed with the payer, which can be different from the entity.
    2. PACRA does not provide consultancy/advisory services or other services to any of its customers or their associated companies and associated undertakings that are being rated or have been rated by it during the preceding three years, unless it has an adequate mechanism in place ensuring that the provision of such services does not lead to a conflict of interest situation with its rating activities. (Chapter III; 12-2-(d))
    3. PACRA discloses that no shareholder directly or indirectly holding 10% or more of the share capital of PACRA also holds directly or indirectly 10% or more of the share capital of the entity which is subject to rating or the entity which issued the instrument subject to rating by PACRA. (Chapter III; 12-2-(f))
    4. PACRA ensures that the rating assigned to an entity or instrument is not affected by the existence of a business relationship between PACRA and the entity or any other party, or the non-existence of such a relationship. (Chapter III; 12-2-(i))
    5. PACRA ensures that the analysts or any of their family members shall not buy, sell, or engage in any transaction in any security which falls in the analyst’s area of primary analytical responsibility. This clause, however, does not apply to investments in securities through collective investment schemes. (Chapter III; 12-2-(l))
    6. PACRA has established policies and procedures governing investments and trading in securities by its employees and for monitoring the same to prevent insider trading, market manipulation, or any other market abuse. (Chapter III; 11-B-(g))
  5. Monitoring and Review
    1. PACRA monitors all the outstanding ratings continuously, and any potential change therein due to any event associated with the issuer, the security arrangement, the industry, etc., is disseminated to the market immediately and in an effective manner after appropriate consultation with the entity/issuer. (Chapter III; 17-(a))
    2. PACRA reviews all the outstanding ratings periodically on an annual basis. Provided that public dissemination of annual review and in an instance of change in rating will be made. (Chapter III; 17-(b))
    3. PACRA initiates an immediate review of the outstanding rating upon becoming aware of any information that may reasonably be expected to result in downgrading of the rating. (Chapter III; 17-(c))
    4. PACRA engages with the issuer and the debt securities trustee to remain updated on all information pertaining to the rating of the entity/instrument. (Chapter III; 17-(d))
  6. Probability of Default
    1. PACRA’s Rating Scale reflects the expectation of credit risk. The highest rating has the lowest relative likelihood of default (i.e., probability). PACRA’s transition studies capture the historical performance behavior of a specific rating notch. Transition behavior of the assigned rating can be obtained from PACRA’s Transition Study available at our website. (www.pacra.com) However, the actual transition of rating may not follow the pattern observed in the past. (Chapter III; 14-3(f)(vii))
  7. Proprietary Information
    1. All information contained herein is considered proprietary by PACRA. Hence, none of the information in this document can be copied or otherwise reproduced, stored, or disseminated in whole or in part in any form or by any means whatsoever by any person without PACRA’s prior written consent.

Jun-26

www.pacra.com