Rating History
Dissemination Date Long-Term Rating Short-Term Rating Outlook Action Rating Watch
06-Nov-26 B A4 Negative Maintain YES
08-Nov-25 B A4 Negative Maintain YES
08-Nov-24 B A4 Negative Downgrade YES
28-Jun-24 BB A4 Negative Maintain YES
29-Dec-23 BB A4 Negative Downgrade YES
About the Entity

Pakistan Services Limited was established in 1958 and is quoted on the Pakistan Stock Exchange. It owns and operates Pearl Continental Hotels – the largest hotel chain in the country with 1,200+ rooms. Mr. Bastien Paul Emile Blanc is the CEO of the Company.

Rating Rationale

Pakistan Services Limited ("PSL" or "the Company"), operating under the Pearl Continental brand, continues to reflect the Company's sizable asset base and established presence in Pakistan's hospitality sector. PSL maintained its position as one of the country's prominent hotel operators with a portfolio comprising more than 1,200 rooms across major commercial and tourist destinations. The assigned ratings remain constrained by the Company's prolonged debt burden, liquidity challenges, and dependence on the successful execution of its debt restructuring strategy. Pakistan's hospitality industry has continued its gradual recovery amid improving domestic travel activity and government initiatives aimed at promoting tourism. Industry estimates project Pakistan's tourism market to grow at a double-digit pace over the medium term, supported by ongoing investment in tourism infrastructure and accommodation facilities. Nevertheless, elevated operating costs, energy tariffs, inflationary pressures, and relatively subdued international tourist inflows continue to affect profitability across the hotel sector. PSL's governance framework underwent notable changes during the review period following significant shifts in the Company's ownership structure. Subsequent to FY25, AKD Group Holdings (Private) Limited together with AKD Securities Limited acquired a ~27.95% stake in the Company, followed by the acquisition of ~28% voting shares by Mr. Dawood Jan Mohammad, subsequently a ~28% stake acquired by Thatta Cement Company Limited from Dawood Jan Mohammad. However, as per notice issued on the Pakistan Stock Exchange on November 03, 2026, Fauji Foundation acquired ~19.7% shares of the Company. These transactions constitute a material change in the ownership landscape, the long-term implications of which remain to be observed. However, as of the review period, the Company's Board composition remained unchanged, while the management structure was also broadly intact, except for the appointment of Mr. Adnan Ahmed Saeed as Acting CFO of PSL. The Company's operations remained stable, with its revenue-generating capacity and profitability profile remaining intact. The Company continued to maintain its gross profit and net profit margins, reflecting the resilience of its core operations and its ability to sustain earnings despite prevailing business conditions. PSL's financial risk profile remains stressed due to its significant debt servicing obligations. Since undertaking its deleveraging program, the Company has repaid principal of PKR ~8.5bln and interest of PKR ~10.4bln against total long-term facilities of PKR ~15.3bln. Outstanding principal obligations currently stand at PKR ~6.8bln, including a Sukuk facility of PKR ~4.5bln. The Company's substantial non-current asset base, valued at PKR ~55.5bln as of 9MFY25, continues to provide support against its debt obligations. However, unresolved restructuring negotiations and pending asset divestments warrant close monitoring and constitute the basis for the rating watch. Going forward, the Company's credit profile remains dependent on the timely execution of its debt restructuring plan and successful monetization of identified assets. The recovery trajectory of the hospitality sector, improvement in occupancy levels, maintenance of profitability, and sufficient liquidity generation for meeting debt obligations will remain important considerations. Furthermore, resolution of the material uncertainty related to the Company's going concern status, as highlighted by external auditors, is considered critical for future rating stability.

Key Rating Drivers

The ratings remain dependent upon the successful restructuring of the Company's outstanding debt obligations, including the Sukuk facility, and the generation of sufficient cash flows to support timely repayments. Improvement in liquidity, sustained profitability, and completion of the planned asset disposal program would provide support to the ratings. Additionally, progress in resolving the uncertainties surrounding the Company's going concern status and adherence to the restructuring milestones remain prerequisites for a favorable rating assessment.

Profile
Legal Structure

Pakistan Services Limited (Hereinafter referred to as "PSL" or "the Company") is a Public Limited Company, quoted on the Pakistan Stock Exchange (PSX).


Background

The Company was established in 1958 by the Government of Pakistan and Pakistan International Airlines, initially operating four hotels in Karachi, Lahore, Rawalpindi, and Peshawar. Managed by InterContinental Hotels & Resorts until 1985, the management was then taken over by Hashoo Group, which rebranded the hotels as Pearl Continental Hotels.


Operations

The Company is principally engaged in the hospitality business and owns and manages the six luxury hotels located in Karachi, Lahore, Rawalpindi, Bhurban, Muzaffarabad and PC Legacy Hunza. There are also other PC-branded hotels in locations like Gwadar, Malam Jabba, Skardu and Hyderabad. Collectively, these six hotels offer around ~1,200+ rooms.


Ownership
Ownership Structure

As of 9MFY25, Sponsors, directors, and CEO cumulatively hold ~1.07% directly and ~0.028% through associated Companies. Banks, DFIs, Insurance Companies, Mudarbas, and mutual funds cumulatively hold ~4.9%. Foreign Companies collectively hold ~30%, (each of these having less than ~10% and there exists no consortium between these Companies), hence, these foreign Companies cannot exercise control over PSL. The remaining ~35% shares are held by others, and ~29% by the general public. However, subsequent to year-end FY25, and as per notices issued on the Pakistan Stock Exchange, AKD Group Holdings (Private) Limited, along with its subsidiary AKD Securities Limited, acquired a ~27.95% shareholding in the Company on July 14, 2025. The following day, July 15,2025, Mr. Dawood Jan Mohammad acquired ~28% of the Company’s voting shares, while on October 14, 2025, Thatta Cement Company Limited acquired the stake of ~28% from Dawood Jan Mohammad. However, as per notice issued on the Pakistan Stock Exchange on November 03, 2026, Fauji Foundation acquired ~19.7% shares of the Company. 


Stability

The ownership remained stable for a long time; however, subsequent to the year-end FY25, share acquisitions have resulted in significant changes to the Company’s ownership structure. With a few shareholders now holding sizable stakes, the governance landscape may be influenced in different ways. The impact on corporate governance and control, along with decision-making dynamics, remains uncertain and is yet to be determined as developments continue to unfold. At the reporting date, free float was recorded at ~94.76%.


Business Acumen

Hashoo Group began its hospitality operations in 1978 with the opening of its first hotel. In 1981, the Group added a second property under the Holiday Inn brand, introducing international standards to its operations. Since then, Hashoo Group has expanded its presence through joint ventures and operational improvements. Its hospitality portfolio includes several well-known hotel brands in Pakistan, reflecting its responsiveness to changing market conditions. Over time, the Group has contributed to the development of the hospitality sector in the country. Following recent changes in the Company’s ownership, the entry of new shareholders with different business backgrounds and experience across the diversified sector marks an important transition phase. While the long-standing operational legacy of Hashoo Group remains integral, the involvement of new investors may influence future strategic direction and governance dynamics. The evolving shareholder structure will be pivotal in shaping the Company’s business approach and sustaining its competitive positioning within the hospitality landscape.


Financial Strength

Since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, PSL has faced persistent challenges in obtaining direct financial support from its sponsors. Despite the sponsors’ deemed strong financial standing, underpinned by diversified business interests across hospitality, oil and gas exploration, information technology, minerals, pharmaceuticals, real estate, and commodity trading, such strength has not translated into tangible financial assistance for PSL. Nevertheless, the Company has continued to steer through operational and financial constraints, maintaining business continuity. While the prevailing economic conditions and sector-specific pressures pose challenges, PSL remains focused on sustaining its operations and exploring potential sources of support within the sponsor network and beyond.


Governance
Board Structure

As of 9MFY25, PSL comprises ten members and remains compliant with the Code of Corporate Governance. The composition includes three Executive Directors, four Non-Executive Directors, and three Independent Directors, ensuring a balanced representation. Following the notable changes in the Company’s shareholding structure in July 2025, the implications for governance dynamics and board composition are gradually unfolding. The evolving ownership landscape is expected to shape the strategic oversight framework, with its full impact likely to become clearer over time.


Members’ Profile

As of 9MFY25, the Board of Directors (BoD) consists of seasoned professionals from the hospitality industry. Chairman Mr. Sadruddin Hashwani has over four decades of experience. Independent directors are industry experts, while executive directors bring in-depth knowledge. Non-executive directors offer independent perspectives for sound decision-making.


Board Effectiveness

The former board has four key committees, including: 1) Audit, 2) Human Resource, 3) Nomination, and 4) Risk Management, which align with the Corporate Governance Code. During 9MFY25, the Board held three meetings with adequate attendance. Meeting minutes are well-documented to ensure transparency and support the overall governance.


Financial Transparency

KPMG Taseer Hadi & Co., a QCR-rated firm in category "A" of the SBP, is the Company's external auditor. They issued an unqualified opinion on the financial statements for the year ending June 30, 2024. However, the auditors drew attention to the existence of material uncertainty related to going concern which states that, as of FY24, the Company's current liabilities exceed its current assets by PKR ~10.11bn.  Auditors also mentioned about the breaches in long-term borrowing agreements and non-compliance with some covenants. However, Audit of FY25 is in progress and Company has been granted extension in holding its annual general meeting. 


Management
Organizational Structure

PSL operates under a structured organizational framework intended to support its business operations and governance practices. The Chief Executive Officer (CEO) leads the organization and is responsible for guiding its strategic direction and overseeing overall performance. Key functional departments—including Finance, Operations, Human Resources, Marketing, and Information Technology—are each headed by a designated leader who reports directly to the CEO. This reporting structure facilitates coordination and supports the implementation of Company-wide initiatives. Leadership and operational roles are currently staffed, contributing to continuity in management. The organizational setup enables PSL to address market conditions, regulatory obligations, and stakeholder needs. This framework reflects the Company’s approach to maintaining operational consistency and governance standards.


Management Team

PSL has undergone a key leadership transition with the appointment of Mr. Bastien Paul Emile Blanc as Chief Executive Officer. Bringing over 20 years of global experience in the hospitality industry, Mr. Bastien Paul Emile Blanc succeeds Mr. Murtaza Hashwani, and is supported by a highly qualified executive team committed to driving operational excellence and strategic growth. At present, Mr. Adnan Ahmed Saeed is the acting CFO of the Company. 


Effectiveness

To enhance managerial effectiveness, PSL would benefit from the establishment of specialized management committees focused on key operational and strategic areas. These committees can play a pivotal role in strengthening oversight, improving coordination, and ensuring timely execution of day-to-day functions. Currently, the management faces challenges in implementing strategic plans and consistently meeting performance targets,which highlights the need for more accurate forecasting, proactive planning, and cross-functional collaboration. By adopting structured decision-making processes and instituting comprehensive performance monitoring frameworks, PSL can improve accountability, streamline operations, and align departmental efforts with corporate objectives. These measures would not only support better resource allocation and risk management but also empower leadership to respond more effectively to market dynamics and operational pressures, ultimately driving sustainable growth and organizational resilience.


MIS

PSL has adopted an integrated, cloud-based management system tailored specifically for the hospitality sector. This advanced platform enhances operational efficiency, streamlines service delivery, and supports real-time decision-making across its hotel portfolio. By leveraging cloud technology, PSL ensures scalability, data security, and improved coordination among departments, reinforcing its commitment to innovation and service excellence.


Control Environment

PSL has established a well-structured and independent Internal Audit Department that plays a vital role in strengthening the Company’s governance, risk management, and internal control environment. Reporting directly to the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors, the department ensures transparency, accountability, and alignment with best practices. It operates across three core dimensions: 1) Assurance, 2) Consulting, and 3) Investigation. In its Assurance role, the department evaluates the effectiveness of internal controls, risk management systems, and compliance with regulatory requirements. Through its Consulting function, it advises management on process improvements, internal control enhancements, and operational efficiency. The investigative role involves conducting special audits and forensic reviews in response to suspected irregularities or non-compliance.


Business Risk
Industry Dynamics

Pakistan’s hotel industry operates within the broader travel, tourism, and hospitality sector, which has exhibited steady recovery in recent years driven by growing domestic tourism, business travel, religious tourism, and improving connectivity infrastructure. The accommodation and food services segment contributes approximately 1.5% of Pakistan’s GDP and around 2.6% of the overall services sector, highlighting the sector’s importance within the national economy. The industry is dominated by organized hotel operators concentrated in major commercial centers such as Karachi, Lahore, and Islamabad, alongside emerging tourism destinations in Gilgit-Baltistan, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, and Azad Jammu & Kashmir. Demand is primarily generated through corporate and government travel, diplomatic activities, domestic leisure tourism, overseas Pakistanis, and religious tourism. According to the Pakistan Travel & Tourism Economic Impact Research published by the World Travel & Tourism Council (WTTC), the travel and tourism sector continues to enhance its contribution to economic activity through increasing domestic and international visitor spending, with positive growth forecasts extending through 2036. The sector has also benefited from government initiatives aimed at promoting tourism, improving visa facilitation, and encouraging private-sector investment in hospitality infrastructure. Several international and local hotel chains have announced expansion plans to capitalize on the country's untapped tourism potential, particularly in northern areas where tourist inflows have increased significantly over the last few years. Notwithstanding the favorable long-term outlook, the industry remains vulnerable to macroeconomic challenges, including inflationary pressures, elevated energy tariffs, exchange rate fluctuations, and security-related perceptions, all of which can affect occupancy levels and profit margins. Nevertheless, premium and business-focused hotels generally maintain relatively resilient occupancy levels due to stable corporate, government, and institutional demand. Overall, the outlook for Pakistan’s hotel industry remains stable, supported by expanding tourism activity, ongoing infrastructure development, rising travel demand, and the sector’s increasing contribution to the national economy.


Relative Position

PSL operates within Pakistan’s hospitality industry through its ownership and management of the Pearl Continental (PC) Hotels chain. With properties located in major urban centers and tourist destinations, the Company maintains a presence in the upscale and luxury hotel segment. The Pearl Continental brand is recognized in the market and competes alongside other established names such as Serena Hotels, Marriott, Avari, and Hilton. PSL’s geographic footprint and service model reflect its focus on meeting the expectations of high-end clientele. The Company continues to invest in infrastructure, technology, and service delivery as part of its broader operational strategy.


Revenues

The Company derives its revenue from four primary sources: rooms (the largest contributor), food and beverage, other related services, and shop license fees. During 9MFY25, the Company achieved a revenue growth of ~15% on year-on-year basis, reaching PKR ~12,945mln, compared to PKR ~15,045mln in FY24. This growth is primarily driven by a notable improvement in operational metrics, including a rise in average occupancy rates from ~57% in FY24 to approximately ~55% in 9MFY25. Additionally, higher average daily room rates and a broader market recovery contributed to the positive financial performance.


Margins

During 9MFY25, PSL reported a notable improvement in profitability. The Company’s gross margin increased to ~46.2%, up from ~39.4% in FY24. This enhancement is primarily attributed to higher average daily room rates (ADR) and more efficient operational management. PSL also achieved a significant rise in net profit, recording PKR ~992mln in 9MFY25 compared to PKR ~425mln in FY24. This notable improvement in profitability is primarily attributable to a surge in sales volumes and a reduction in finance costs during the review period. The results reflect heightened market demand and improved occupancy rates across the Company’s hotel portfolio,underscoring PSL’s strengthened operational performance and strategic market positioning.


Sustainability

Over the past two years, PSL faced significant challenges in meeting its debt obligations, despite maintaining a substantial asset base. In response, the Company undertook a strategic initiative to stabilize its financial position by divesting non-core assets. This approach enabled PSL to retire a considerable portion of its outstanding debt and accrued interest. Since undertaking its deleveraging program, the Company has repaid principal of PKR ~8.5bln and interest of PKR ~10.4bln against total long-term facilities of PKR ~15.3bln. Outstanding principal obligations currently stand at PKR ~6.8bln, including a Sukuk facility of PKR ~4.5bln. The Company's substantial non-current asset base, valued at PKR ~55.5bln as of 9MFY25, continues to provide support against its debt obligations. Recognizing a persistent mismatch between cash inflows and debt servicing requirements, management launched a two-phase debt restructuring plan. The initial phase encountered several challenges, particularly in liquidating designated assets to generate the necessary cash flows. The Company is currently engaged in discussions with its banking partners, aiming to reach an amicable resolution within the current quarter.


Financial Risk
Working capital

During 9MFY25, the Company successfully maintained a strong position in its working capital management, achieving a negative net working capital cycle of -8 days, compared to -12 days in FY24. This performance reflects the Company’s continued focus on operational efficiency and liquidity optimization. The successful execution of initiatives aimed at enhancing cash flows remains critical to addressing the asset-liability mismatch and ensuring long-term financial stability.


Coverages

During 9MFY25, the Company generated free cash flows from operations amounting to PKR 3,338mln, compared to PKR 3,446mln in FY24. While slightly lower year-over-year, the Company demonstrated improved financial efficiency, as reflected in its interest coverage ratio, which rose to ~2.8x in 9MFY25 from ~1.5x in FY24. This improvement indicates enhanced capacity to meet interest obligations, driven by stronger operational cash flows and better cost management.


Capitalization

The Company's debt book primarily consists of short-term borrowings, amounting to PKR ~10,068mln as of 9MFY25. This shift is due to the reclassification of long-term borrowings to the current portion in FY24 following restructuring arrangements. The Company’s proposal to restructure its long-term loan and Sukuk facilities is currently under review. While preliminary approval has been granted based on mutually agreed terms, the process has experienced delays due to ongoing internal approval procedures among the lending institutions. The Company continues to engage with all relevant stakeholders and expects to receive the final term sheets upon completion of the remaining formalities. Total borrowings during 9MFY25 were PKR ~10,382mln, compared to PKR ~10,388mlnin FY24. The gearing ratio for 9MFY25 was recorded at ~18.3% from ~19% in FY24, indicating a modest reduction in financial leverage.


 
 

Nov-26

www.pacra.com


(PKR mln)


Mar-25
9M
Jun-24
12M
Jun-23
12M
Jun-22
12M
A. BALANCE SHEET
1. Non-Current Assets 56,851 56,012 47,853 51,090
2. Investments 811 1,485 1,216 1,833
3. Related Party Exposure 1,556 1,627 1,770 2,913
4. Current Assets 3,811 3,145 13,902 10,224
a. Inventories 370 289 306 147
b. Trade Receivables 1,089 880 940 781
5. Total Assets 63,029 62,269 64,742 66,060
6. Current Liabilities 4,437 4,545 4,566 4,105
a. Trade Payables 1,704 1,675 1,712 1,042
7. Borrowings 10,382 10,388 14,053 15,887
8. Related Party Exposure 94 135 65 24
9. Non-Current Liabilities 1,229 1,306 1,119 890
10. Net Assets 46,887 45,895 44,939 45,154
11. Shareholders' Equity 46,887 45,895 44,939 45,154
B. INCOME STATEMENT
1. Sales 12,945 15,045 13,262 11,988
a. Cost of Good Sold (6,970) (9,122) (8,235) (7,026)
2. Gross Profit 5,975 5,923 5,027 4,962
a. Operating Expenses (3,202) (4,080) (3,850) (2,899)
3. Operating Profit 2,773 1,843 1,177 2,064
a. Non Operating Income or (Expense) 127 1,190 816 (58)
4. Profit or (Loss) before Interest and Tax 2,900 3,033 1,992 2,005
a. Total Finance Cost (1,344) (2,464) (1,925) (1,378)
b. Taxation (564) (144) (286) (18)
6. Net Income Or (Loss) 992 425 (218) 609
C. CASH FLOW STATEMENT
a. Free Cash Flows from Operations (FCFO) 3,338 3,446 2,047 3,072
b. Net Cash from Operating Activities before Working Capital Changes 2,632 133 (397) 877
c. Changes in Working Capital (417) 256 494 (90)
1. Net Cash provided by Operating Activities 2,215 389 97 786
2. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Investing Activities (926) 3,045 1,756 427
3. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Financing Activities (351) (3,584) (1,243) (707)
4. Net Cash generated or (Used) during the period 939 (150) 610 507
D. RATIO ANALYSIS
1. Performance
a. Sales Growth (for the period) 14.7% 13.4% 10.6% 0.0%
b. Gross Profit Margin 46.2% 39.4% 37.9% 41.4%
c. Net Profit Margin 7.7% 2.8% -1.6% 5.1%
d. Cash Conversion Efficiency (FCFO adjusted for Working Capital/Sales) 22.6% 24.6% 19.2% 24.9%
e. Return on Equity [ Net Profit Margin * Asset Turnover * (Total Assets/Shareholders' Equity )] 2.9% 0.9% -0.5% 1.3%
2. Working Capital Management
a. Gross Working Capital (Average Days) 28 29 30 28
b. Net Working Capital (Average Days) -8 -12 -8 -3
c. Current Ratio (Current Assets / Current Liabilities) 0.9 0.7 3.0 2.5
3. Coverages
a. EBITDA / Finance Cost 3.1 1.5 1.5 2.8
b. FCFO / Finance Cost+CMLTB+Excess STB 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.5
c. Debt Payback (Total Borrowings+Excess STB) / (FCFO-Finance Cost) 3.7 8.8 43.8 7.3
4. Capital Structure
a. Total Borrowings / (Total Borrowings+Shareholders' Equity) 18.3% 18.7% 23.9% 26.1%
b. Interest or Markup Payable (Days) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
c. Entity Average Borrowing Rate 15.3% 17.1% 11.8% 7.3%

Nov-26

www.pacra.com

Nov-26

www.pacra.com

  1. Rating Team Statements
    1. Rating is just an opinion about the creditworthiness of the entity and does not constitute a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell any security of the entity rated or to buy, hold, or sell the security rated, as the case may be. (Chapter III; 14-3-(x))
    2. Conflict of Interest
      1. The Rating Team or any of their family members have no interest in this rating (Chapter III; 12-2-(j))
      2. PACRA, the analysts involved in the rating process, and members of its rating committee and their family members do not have any conflict of interest relating to the rating done by them (Chapter III; 12-2-(e) & (k))
      3. The analyst is not a substantial shareholder of the customer being rated by PACRA [Annexure F; d-(ii)]
      4. Explanation: for the purpose of the above clause, the term "family members" shall include only those family members who are dependent on the analyst and members of the rating committee.
  2. Restrictions
    1. No director, officer, or employee of PACRA communicates the information acquired by him for use for rating purposes to any other person, except where required under law to do so. (Chapter III; 10-(5))
    2. PACRA does not disclose or discuss with outside parties or make improper use of the non-public information which has come to its knowledge during a business relationship with the customer. (Chapter III; 10-7-(d))
    3. PACRA does not make proposals or recommendations regarding the activities of rated entities that could impact a credit rating of the entity subject to rating. (Chapter III; 10-7-(k))
  3. Conduct of Business
    1. PACRA fulfills its obligations in a fair, efficient, transparent, and ethical manner and renders high standards of services in performing its functions and obligations. (Chapter III; 11-A-(a))
    2. PACRA uses due care in the preparation of this Rating Report. Our information has been obtained from sources we consider to be reliable, but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. PACRA does not, in every instance, independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing this Rating Report. (Clause 11-(A)(p))
    3. PACRA prohibits its employees and analysts from soliciting money, gifts, or favors from anyone with whom PACRA conducts business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(q))
    4. PACRA ensures before the commencement of the rating process that an analyst or employee has not had a recent employment or other significant business or personal relationship with the rated entity that may cause or may be perceived as causing a conflict of interest. (Chapter III; 11-A-(r))
    5. PACRA maintains the principle of integrity in seeking rating business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(u))
    6. PACRA promptly investigates in the event of misconduct or a breach of the policies, procedures, and controls, and takes appropriate steps to rectify any weaknesses to prevent any recurrence, along with suitable punitive action against the responsible employee(s). (Chapter III; 11-B-(m))
  4. Independence & Conflict of Interest
    1. PACRA receives compensation from the entity being rated or any third party for the rating services it offers. The receipt of this compensation has no influence on PACRA’s opinions or other analytical processes. In all instances, PACRA is committed to preserving the objectivity, integrity, and independence of its ratings. Our relationship is governed by two distinct mandates: i) rating mandate - signed with the entity being rated or issuer of the debt instrument, and ii) fee mandate - signed with the payer, which can be different from the entity.
    2. PACRA does not provide consultancy/advisory services or other services to any of its customers or their associated companies and associated undertakings that are being rated or have been rated by it during the preceding three years, unless it has an adequate mechanism in place ensuring that the provision of such services does not lead to a conflict of interest situation with its rating activities. (Chapter III; 12-2-(d))
    3. PACRA discloses that no shareholder directly or indirectly holding 10% or more of the share capital of PACRA also holds directly or indirectly 10% or more of the share capital of the entity which is subject to rating or the entity which issued the instrument subject to rating by PACRA. (Chapter III; 12-2-(f))
    4. PACRA ensures that the rating assigned to an entity or instrument is not affected by the existence of a business relationship between PACRA and the entity or any other party, or the non-existence of such a relationship. (Chapter III; 12-2-(i))
    5. PACRA ensures that the analysts or any of their family members shall not buy, sell, or engage in any transaction in any security which falls in the analyst’s area of primary analytical responsibility. This clause, however, does not apply to investments in securities through collective investment schemes. (Chapter III; 12-2-(l))
    6. PACRA has established policies and procedures governing investments and trading in securities by its employees and for monitoring the same to prevent insider trading, market manipulation, or any other market abuse. (Chapter III; 11-B-(g))
  5. Monitoring and Review
    1. PACRA monitors all the outstanding ratings continuously, and any potential change therein due to any event associated with the issuer, the security arrangement, the industry, etc., is disseminated to the market immediately and in an effective manner after appropriate consultation with the entity/issuer. (Chapter III; 17-(a))
    2. PACRA reviews all the outstanding ratings periodically on an annual basis. Provided that public dissemination of annual review and in an instance of change in rating will be made. (Chapter III; 17-(b))
    3. PACRA initiates an immediate review of the outstanding rating upon becoming aware of any information that may reasonably be expected to result in downgrading of the rating. (Chapter III; 17-(c))
    4. PACRA engages with the issuer and the debt securities trustee to remain updated on all information pertaining to the rating of the entity/instrument. (Chapter III; 17-(d))
  6. Probability of Default
    1. PACRA’s Rating Scale reflects the expectation of credit risk. The highest rating has the lowest relative likelihood of default (i.e., probability). PACRA’s transition studies capture the historical performance behavior of a specific rating notch. Transition behavior of the assigned rating can be obtained from PACRA’s Transition Study available at our website. (www.pacra.com) However, the actual transition of rating may not follow the pattern observed in the past. (Chapter III; 14-3(f)(vii))
  7. Proprietary Information
    1. All information contained herein is considered proprietary by PACRA. Hence, none of the information in this document can be copied or otherwise reproduced, stored, or disseminated in whole or in part in any form or by any means whatsoever by any person without PACRA’s prior written consent.

Nov-26

www.pacra.com