Rating History
Dissemination Date Long-Term Rating Short-Term Rating Outlook Action Rating Watch
11-Nov-26 A+ A1 Stable Maintain -
11-Nov-25 A+ A1 Stable Maintain -
15-Nov-24 A+ A1 Stable Maintain -
17-Nov-23 A+ A1 Stable Initial -
About the Entity

Prism Energy (Private) Limited (“PEPL” or “the Company”) was incorporated in Pakistan in June 2019 as a private limited company to invest in, develop and operate solar power projects for the commercial and industrial (C&I) sector. The Company is led by its CEO, Mr. Arooj Asghar, who is supported by a five-member board and a team of qualified professionals.

Rating Rationale

Prism Energy (Private) Limited commenced its solar energy operations in Pakistan in August 2020, operating mainly under Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) and Build-Own-Operate-Transfer (BOOT) models. The Company operates a portfolio of 17 rooftop solar plants with a cumulative capacity of approximately 12.9 MW, serving established industrial and commercial clients including the World Bank Group, Islamabad, IMC Hospital, Chakwal Textile Mills, Dawn Food Corporation, Country Paper & Board Mills, Rustam Towel, Faisalabad Dry Port Trust and may others. Revenues are generated under 10 to 15-year PKR-denominated agreements priced at a discount to grid tariffs, providing visibility over cash flows. O&M is managed in-house, and the plants have maintained performance ratios of over 95%. A 468 kWp project with BESS has been signed and around 1 MW is in the pipeline, all to be funded through equity. Financial performance improved in FY26, with revenues increasing by 31% to PKR 167mln (FY25: PKR 128mln) and gross margins strengthening to 91.2% (FY25: 86.1%). The Company posted a net profit of PKR 67mln in FY26, against a net loss of PKR 26mln in FY25, which stemmed mainly from a one-time revaluation of solar panels. The Company remains debt-free, with shareholders' equity of PKR 1,301mln and cash and short-term investments of PKR 252mln at end-Jun'26, while new projects continue to be funded through sponsor equity and internal cash flows.

Key Rating Drivers

The ratings are dependent on the Company's ability to sustain stable cash flows from its operational solar portfolio and to maintain timely collections from its clients, given the concentration of the portfolio in the textile sector. Lower industrial grid tariffs and the revised net-billing regime may constrain pricing on new contracts, making the conversion of the project pipeline on viable terms important for growth. Maintaining a strong liquidity position and a conservative, equity-based capital structure remains critical. Any significant decline in margins or deterioration in collections would impact the ratings.

Profile
Plant

Prism Energy (Private) Limited operates a portfolio of rooftop solar power plants with a cumulative installed capacity of approximately 12.8 MW across seventeen operational sites, primarily serving commercial and industrial clients. The Company is actively seeking to  develop 40 MW distributed rooftop solar platform that targets financially stable and energy-intensive businesses seeking reliable clean power. Each installation is designed, financed, and maintained by PEPL under a long-term partnership model that guarantees technical reliability and efficiency. The Company’s project pipeline continues to grow, supported by client referrals and industry recognition for consistent delivery performance. PEPL’s operational strategy emphasizes scalability, cost efficiency, and grid independence, aligning with national renewable energy goals.


Tariff

Under PEPL’s business model, tariffs are negotiated directly with clients and offered at a discount to prevailing grid (DISCO) rates. The tariffs, denominated in Pakistani Rupees, are structured to ensure stable, long-term revenue streams under 10–15 year Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs). Payment security is ensured through six-month receivable deposits or bank guarantees from clients, thereby minimizing counterparty risk. The tariff structure considers project size, capital recovery period, and technology specifications to maintain cost competitiveness while safeguarding profit margins. Annual tariff reviews are conducted to adjust for inflation, changes in O&M costs, and currency depreciation. This model ensures predictable returns for the Company while offering clients affordable energy solutions in a high-tariff environment.


Return on Project

PEPL’s projects deliver stable internal rates of return (IRR), depending on project size, location, and contractual tenure, meeting shareholders' expectations. These returns are supported by stable annuity-style cash flows generated through long-term PPAs and BOOT agreements. Capital costs are fully recovered via installment-based reimbursements embedded in client contracts, reducing exposure to credit default. Operational efficiency and reliable solar resource availability have allowed PEPL to maintain consistent plant performance ratios of over 95%. Overall, the project portfolio exhibits a healthy risk-return balance, reinforcing sustainability of earnings and investor confidence.


Ownership
Ownership Structure

PEPL is a joint venture between InfraCo Pakistan Sunrise (holding 95%), a subsidiary of InfraCo Asia, and Albario Engineering (AEPL, holding 4.98%), with nominal individual shareholding.



Stability

PEPL Stability is refelected from steady clientage, consistant cash flows. The management framework minimizes governance risks, enhances investor confidence, and supports future expansion. Prism Management dedicated to advancing Pakistan’s renewable energy transition, PEPL’s steady Cash flows serves as a key credit strength against market volatility.



Business Acumen

PEPL management have proven track records in energy infrastructure, enabling PEPL to leverage best practices in technical, financial, and regulatory management. This combination of international oversight and local execution expertise is a critical differentiator within Pakistan’s emerging renewable market.


Financial Strength

The financial position of PEPL provides substantial comfort to creditors and counterparties. PEPL is financially stable and sustain its operations and new projects from its cash flows keeping the Company debt-free. This robust capitalization allows PEPL to absorb potential revenue delays or project deferrals without strain. Overall, the Company’s funding resilience and access to institutional capital remain key rating positives.   



Governance
Board Structure

PEPL’s Board of Directors comprises five members - four nominated by InfraCo Asia and one by AEPL - ensuring balanced representation of both strategic and operational interests. The board composition reflects a blend of international project finance and local engineering expertise. Directors oversee strategic planning, investment approval, and policy compliance. The structure provides clear segregation of executive and non-executive roles, fostering accountability. Regular board meetings ensure proactive monitoring of performance and financial targets. This governance model aligns with international standards while maintaining local operational agility.



Members’ Profile

The Board members bring decades of cumulative experience in renewable energy, finance, and infrastructure management. Their collective exposure to project development, EPC management, and strategic investment provides depth and continuity to decision-making. Each member contributes specialized oversight - financial governance, technical audit, or stakeholder engagement - ensuring comprehensive control. The board’s diversified expertise supports the Company in balancing commercial viability with sustainability commitments. Attendance levels remain high, reflecting active participation and effective stewardship.


Board Effectiveness

The Board exercises oversight across strategic and operational areas, including project approvals, risk management and compliance monitoring. All decisions are guided by PEPL's internal control framework, ensuring transparency and efficiency. Independent evaluations and quarterly performance reviews further promote accountability and sound governance. Alignment between board directives and management execution has supported consistent project delivery, with approximately 1 MW of additional capacity in the pipeline. The Board's emphasis on prudent financial management and ESG integration supports PEPL's position as a credible and responsible renewable energy developer


Financial Transparency

Financial reporting follows IFRS, and the external auditor, BDO Chartered Accountants, issued an unqualified opinion on the FY25 financial statements. The FY26 audit is in progress. The Company maintains a transparent accounting system supported by InfraCo Asia’s internal audit and compliance checks. Timely submission of regulatory filings and disclosure of related-party transactions reflect strong control practices. PEPL also prepares monthly / quarterly management reports for sponsors, ensuring financial visibility. The consistent audit track record and clean compliance history strengthen credit confidence.


Management
Organizational Structure

PEPL maintains a well-defined, lean, and functionally specialized organizational structure designed for efficient project delivery and oversight. The Company operates through seven key departments—Finance & Administration, Proposal & Design, Business Development, Execution, Operations, Projects & Contracts, and HSE/Environment. Each department is led by a qualified professional with relevant industry experience and clear reporting lines to senior management. The structure emphasizes inter-departmental collaboration, ensuring smooth coordination between project acquisition, engineering, and execution stages. Decision-making authority is decentralized at the operational level but consolidated strategically under the CEO, promoting both agility and control. Regular reporting to the board and sponsors enhances organizational discipline and transparency.


Management Team

The Company is led by Mr. Arooj Asghar, an experienced professional with over two decades in renewable energy, who oversees overall strategy, financial planning, and stakeholder relations. Mr. Arooj Asghar is supported by a core management team including Mr. Abdul Wahab (Financial Controller), Mr. Noman Umar (Chief Financial Officer) and, Mr. Hassan Bilal (Chief Operating Officer). The leadership team combines experience in EPC design, portfolio management, and client servicing, ensuring effective operational control. Around twenty engineers and technicians form the technical backbone of PEPL, ensuring timely installation and maintenance. The management’s composition demonstrates strong alignment between technical expertise and commercial execution


Effectiveness

PEPL’s management demonstrates strong operational efficiency and responsiveness through clear KPIs and standardized reporting mechanisms. Each functional head submits monthly performance dashboards and quarterly progress reports reviewed by the CEO and board. This systematic approach enables early identification of project bottlenecks and cost overruns. The company’s track record of on-schedule project completion and consistent operational uptime (> 98 %) highlights effective leadership. Management decisions are guided by data-driven project evaluation models and robust MIS insights.



Control Environment

The control environment within PEPL is anchored in strict compliance with PEPL’s governance framework and Pakistan’s Companies Act 2017. The Company employs internal control systems that include dual-authorization of expenditures, quarterly internal audits, and segregation of financial duties. InfraCo Asia’s audit division periodically reviews operational practices, ensuring adherence to environmental and safety standards. PEPL’s MIS infrastructure enables daily monitoring of cash flows, project status, and procurement activities. Regular staff training on compliance and safety enhances organizational integrity. Collectively, these mechanisms ensure transparency, minimize operational fraud risk, and reinforce internal governance maturity.



Operational Risk
Power Purchase Agreement

PEPL’s core revenue model is anchored in long-term Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs) and Buyout (BOOT) ranging from 10 to 15 years, ensuring stable cash inflows and predictable project economics. These PPAs and BOOT Agreements are denominated in PKR, structured to match client consumption profiles, and include escalation clauses to reflect inflationary movements. Contracts require clients to provide security deposits equivalent to six months of projected billing, significantly reducing counterparty risk. The agreements also outline clear termination rights, default remedies, and energy-delivery obligations. PEPL’s contract portfolio predominantly comprises creditworthy industrial and commercial clients, lowering collection risk. The contractual diversity across sectors—textiles, paper, healthcare—further mitigates concentration risk.


Operation and Maintenance

The O&M services are being managed entirely in-house. This enables greater operational control, improved efficiency, and enhanced quality assurance. The internal operations team oversees preventive maintenance, performance monitoring, and regular inspections to ensure optimal system uptime and reliability. This in-house model allows PEPL to maintain stronger technical oversight while reducing operational costs and ensuring consistent energy generation across its project portfolio.


Resource Risk

Over 95% of Pakistan receives abundant solar radiation averaging 5–7 kWh/m²/day, with the southwestern province of Balochistan and the northeastern region of Sindh recording 2,300–2,700 sunshine hours annually. This positions the country among regions with exceptionally high solar potential. As a solar power producer, PEPL operates within this favorable environment but remains subject to natural variability in solar irradiance and weather conditions that can influence annual energy generation. To mitigate such risks, PEPL benefits from its geographically diversified project portfolio, which reduces exposure to localized climatic fluctuations. The Company employs Tier-1 photovoltaic modules, advanced inverters, and remote monitoring systems to enhance system reliability and minimize yield losses. Regular performance ratio (PR) assessments and irradiance correlation analyses are conducted to validate energy forecasts, while dust and heat-related losses are controlled through automated cleaning systems and structured maintenance protocols.


Insurance Cover

PEPL maintains comprehensive insurance coverage for all operating assets under an “All-Risks” policy that includes protection against fire, flood, theft, terrorism, and machinery breakdown. Policies are renewed annually with reputed insurers, meeting both lender and sponsor requirements. Coverage extends to third-party liabilities and business-interruption losses, ensuring financial protection against unforeseen downtime. Claim procedures are clearly defined, enabling swift compensation in the event of damage or disruption. This extensive coverage significantly reduces residual operational risk.


Performance Risk
Industry Dynamics

Pakistan's distributed solar market has witnessed substantial growth, supported by declining equipment costs, rising grid tariffs and increased adoption of alternative energy solutions. Solar panel imports reached 17.9 GW in FY25, while cumulative installed solar capacity was estimated at 51 GW by March 2026. The growing adoption of distributed solar has also contributed to a decline in grid-based electricity generation. However, the operating environment for new commercial and industrial (C&I) solar projects has become relatively challenging in 2026, primarily due to regulatory changes and declining industrial tariffs. The regulatory framework has shifted from net metering to net billing for new prosumers following the introduction of NEPRA's Prosumer Regulations, 2026, effective February 9, 2026, with a reduced rate for electricity supplied to the grid. Existing consumers were subsequently exempted from the revised arrangement. Meanwhile, industrial electricity tariffs have declined from PKR 49.19/kWh in March 2024 to PKR 34.75/kWh in March 2026, with a further reduction of up to PKR 4.58/kWh implemented in February 2026. The lower grid tariff has reduced the pricing advantage available to third-party solar providers, including PEPL, which typically offer electricity at a discount to grid rates. On the supply side, continued oversupply from Chinese manufacturers has kept solar module prices relatively low, although the introduction of 10% GST on imported panels in 2025 has partly offset the cost benefit. Overall, these developments have increased the attractiveness of self-financed rooftop installations while putting pressure on pricing flexibility and margins for new solar PPAs.


Generation

Across its 17 operational sites, PEPL generated around 15.5 GWh during FY26, reflecting stable performance in line with designed capacity. System availability remained above 98%, with downtime primarily due to scheduled maintenance. The Company’s MIS enables real-time monitoring of generation output, inverter efficiency, and module temperature, allowing prompt identification of performance deviations. New projects totaling 1.5–1.8 MW are expected to be commissioned in FY27, further enhancing geographical diversification and capacity. Sustained operational performance underscores PEPL’s technical reliability and strengthens its overall profile.




Performance Benchmark

PEPL’s overall portfolio maintains a performance ratio (PR) over 95%, comparable to global standards for rooftop solar projects in similar climatic zones. Monthly yield variance typically remains within ± 5 % of modeled projections, underscoring operational consistency. Benchmarking is conducted quarterly against EPC design parameters and verified through independent energy audits. O&M KPIs include inverter uptime, irradiation utilization, and degradation factor, all tracked via remote SCADA systems. The company’s preventive-maintenance regime minimizes PR losses due to soiling or component wear. Stable PR trends strengthen revenue predictability and support rating comfort.



Financial Risk
Financing Structure Analysis

Currently, PEPL’s entire capital structure is equity-financed, totaling approximately PKR 1.23 billion, eliminating interest and refinancing risk. The company plans to introduce project-specific debt, under a 70:30 debt-to-equity mix, leveraging its strong equity base. Future debt is expected to be secured through local financial institutions or development partners, backed by stable PPA revenues. The planned financing strategy aims to optimize cost of capital without overstretching leverage. Prior to borrowing, PEPL intends to establish a Debt Service Reserve Account (DSRA) equivalent to two semiannual payments to preserve repayment capacity.


Liquidity Profile

PEPL's liquidity position remains comfortable, supported by cash and TDRs of PKR 252mln at Jun'26 (Jun'25: PKR 177mln) against cash liabilities of approximately PKR 57mln, comprising trade payables and staff gratuity. The reported current ratio of 0.6x is understated due to the inclusion of PKR 191m in unearned finance income, a non-cash accounting balance, under current liabilities. Excluding this amount, the current ratio improves to 2.7x, even before considering PKR 230mln held in TDRs.


Working Capital Financing

PEPL operates with a lean working capital structure, which is funded entirely from internal resources as the Company has no short-term borrowing lines. Gross working capital days declined significantly from 1,558 in FY24 and 598 in FY25 to 140 in FY26, as projects previously held in work-in-progress were completed and collections improved. Trade receivable days fell to 119 in FY26 (FY25: 240; FY24: 459), while net working capital days stood at 41 (FY25: 412). Inventory now comprises only spares of PKR 8mln.


Cash Flow Analysis

PEPL's cash flow generation improved in FY26, supported by the stabilization of its installed solar generation capacity across various sites. FCFO turned positive at PKR 69.5mln, compared to an outflow of PKR 21.8mln in FY25, reflecting 31% revenue growth and a 43% reduction in operating expenses. As the Company remains debt-free, debt servicing and related coverage indicators are not applicable. Other income, mainly comprising profit on TDRs, contributed 24% to pre-tax profit in FY26. This contribution is expected to moderate amid declining interest rates and the planned utilization of cash for upcoming projects.


Capitalization

The Company has maintained a debt-free capital structure, with shareholders' equity of PKR 1,301mln at end-Jun'26, after accounting for accumulated losses of PKR 257mln. Accumulated losses declined from PKR 323mln in Jun'25, supported by FY26 profitability. Going forward, management intends to finance new projects through a mix of equity contributions and project-specific borrowings internally generated cashflows.


 
 

Nov-26

www.pacra.com


(PKR mln)


Jun-26
12M
Jun-25
12M
Jun-24
12M
A. BALANCE SHEET
1. Non-Current Assets 1,183 1,039 754
2. Investments 230 160 239
3. Related Party Exposure 0 0 0
4. Current Assets 136 101 399
a. Inventories 8 8 244
b. Trade Receivables 53 55 113
5. Total Assets 1,549 1,301 1,393
6. Current Liabilities 241 58 128
a. Trade Payables 50 41 90
7. Borrowings 0 0 0
8. Related Party Exposure 0 0 0
9. Non-Current Liabilities 7 7 5
10. Net Assets 1,301 1,235 1,261
11. Shareholders' Equity 1,301 1,235 1,261
B. INCOME STATEMENT
1. Sales 167 128 81
a. Cost of Good Sold (15) (18) (17)
2. Gross Profit 153 110 64
a. Operating Expenses (102) (178) (75)
3. Operating Profit 51 (68) (11)
a. Non Operating Income or (Expense) 16 42 42
4. Profit or (Loss) before Interest and Tax 67 (26) 31
a. Total Finance Cost 0 0 0
b. Taxation 0 0 (5)
6. Net Income Or (Loss) 67 (26) 25
C. CASH FLOW STATEMENT
a. Free Cash Flows from Operations (FCFO) 70 (22) 26
b. Net Cash from Operating Activities before Working Capital Changes 70 (22) 26
c. Changes in Working Capital (137) 45 64
1. Net Cash provided by Operating Activities (67) 23 90
2. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Investing Activities 73 (30) (378)
3. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Financing Activities 0 0 509
4. Net Cash generated or (Used) during the period 6 (7) 222
D. RATIO ANALYSIS
1. Performance
a. Sales Growth (for the period) 30.7% 58.0% 28.4%
b. Gross Profit Margin 91.2% 86.1% 79.1%
c. Net Profit Margin 40.0% -20.1% 31.4%
d. Cash Conversion Efficiency (FCFO adjusted for Working Capital/Sales) -40.1% 18.3% 111.2%
e. Return on Equity [ Net Profit Margin * Asset Turnover * (Total Assets/Shareholders' Equity )] 5.6% -2.0% 2.6%
2. Working Capital Management
a. Gross Working Capital (Average Days) 140 598 1558
b. Net Working Capital (Average Days) 41 412 1315
c. Current Ratio (Current Assets / Current Liabilities) 0.6 1.7 3.1
3. Coverages
a. EBITDA / Finance Cost N/A N/A N/A
b. FCFO / Finance Cost+CMLTB+Excess STB N/A N/A N/A
c. Debt Payback (Total Borrowings+Excess STB) / (FCFO-Finance Cost) 0.0 0.0 0.0
4. Capital Structure
a. Total Borrowings / (Total Borrowings+Shareholders' Equity) 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
b. Interest or Markup Payable (Days) N/A N/A N/A
c. Entity Average Borrowing Rate #DIV/0! 0.0% #DIV/0!

Nov-26

www.pacra.com

Nov-26

www.pacra.com

  1. Rating Team Statements
    1. Rating is just an opinion about the creditworthiness of the entity and does not constitute a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell any security of the entity rated or to buy, hold, or sell the security rated, as the case may be. (Chapter III; 14-3-(x))
    2. Conflict of Interest
      1. The Rating Team or any of their family members have no interest in this rating (Chapter III; 12-2-(j))
      2. PACRA, the analysts involved in the rating process, and members of its rating committee and their family members do not have any conflict of interest relating to the rating done by them (Chapter III; 12-2-(e) & (k))
      3. The analyst is not a substantial shareholder of the customer being rated by PACRA [Annexure F; d-(ii)]
      4. Explanation: for the purpose of the above clause, the term "family members" shall include only those family members who are dependent on the analyst and members of the rating committee.
  2. Restrictions
    1. No director, officer, or employee of PACRA communicates the information acquired by him for use for rating purposes to any other person, except where required under law to do so. (Chapter III; 10-(5))
    2. PACRA does not disclose or discuss with outside parties or make improper use of the non-public information which has come to its knowledge during a business relationship with the customer. (Chapter III; 10-7-(d))
    3. PACRA does not make proposals or recommendations regarding the activities of rated entities that could impact a credit rating of the entity subject to rating. (Chapter III; 10-7-(k))
  3. Conduct of Business
    1. PACRA fulfills its obligations in a fair, efficient, transparent, and ethical manner and renders high standards of services in performing its functions and obligations. (Chapter III; 11-A-(a))
    2. PACRA uses due care in the preparation of this Rating Report. Our information has been obtained from sources we consider to be reliable, but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. PACRA does not, in every instance, independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing this Rating Report. (Clause 11-(A)(p))
    3. PACRA prohibits its employees and analysts from soliciting money, gifts, or favors from anyone with whom PACRA conducts business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(q))
    4. PACRA ensures before the commencement of the rating process that an analyst or employee has not had a recent employment or other significant business or personal relationship with the rated entity that may cause or may be perceived as causing a conflict of interest. (Chapter III; 11-A-(r))
    5. PACRA maintains the principle of integrity in seeking rating business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(u))
    6. PACRA promptly investigates in the event of misconduct or a breach of the policies, procedures, and controls, and takes appropriate steps to rectify any weaknesses to prevent any recurrence, along with suitable punitive action against the responsible employee(s). (Chapter III; 11-B-(m))
  4. Independence & Conflict of Interest
    1. PACRA receives compensation from the entity being rated or any third party for the rating services it offers. The receipt of this compensation has no influence on PACRA’s opinions or other analytical processes. In all instances, PACRA is committed to preserving the objectivity, integrity, and independence of its ratings. Our relationship is governed by two distinct mandates: i) rating mandate - signed with the entity being rated or issuer of the debt instrument, and ii) fee mandate - signed with the payer, which can be different from the entity.
    2. PACRA does not provide consultancy/advisory services or other services to any of its customers or their associated companies and associated undertakings that are being rated or have been rated by it during the preceding three years, unless it has an adequate mechanism in place ensuring that the provision of such services does not lead to a conflict of interest situation with its rating activities. (Chapter III; 12-2-(d))
    3. PACRA discloses that no shareholder directly or indirectly holding 10% or more of the share capital of PACRA also holds directly or indirectly 10% or more of the share capital of the entity which is subject to rating or the entity which issued the instrument subject to rating by PACRA. (Chapter III; 12-2-(f))
    4. PACRA ensures that the rating assigned to an entity or instrument is not affected by the existence of a business relationship between PACRA and the entity or any other party, or the non-existence of such a relationship. (Chapter III; 12-2-(i))
    5. PACRA ensures that the analysts or any of their family members shall not buy, sell, or engage in any transaction in any security which falls in the analyst’s area of primary analytical responsibility. This clause, however, does not apply to investments in securities through collective investment schemes. (Chapter III; 12-2-(l))
    6. PACRA has established policies and procedures governing investments and trading in securities by its employees and for monitoring the same to prevent insider trading, market manipulation, or any other market abuse. (Chapter III; 11-B-(g))
  5. Monitoring and Review
    1. PACRA monitors all the outstanding ratings continuously, and any potential change therein due to any event associated with the issuer, the security arrangement, the industry, etc., is disseminated to the market immediately and in an effective manner after appropriate consultation with the entity/issuer. (Chapter III; 17-(a))
    2. PACRA reviews all the outstanding ratings periodically on an annual basis. Provided that public dissemination of annual review and in an instance of change in rating will be made. (Chapter III; 17-(b))
    3. PACRA initiates an immediate review of the outstanding rating upon becoming aware of any information that may reasonably be expected to result in downgrading of the rating. (Chapter III; 17-(c))
    4. PACRA engages with the issuer and the debt securities trustee to remain updated on all information pertaining to the rating of the entity/instrument. (Chapter III; 17-(d))
  6. Probability of Default
    1. PACRA’s Rating Scale reflects the expectation of credit risk. The highest rating has the lowest relative likelihood of default (i.e., probability). PACRA’s transition studies capture the historical performance behavior of a specific rating notch. Transition behavior of the assigned rating can be obtained from PACRA’s Transition Study available at our website. (www.pacra.com) However, the actual transition of rating may not follow the pattern observed in the past. (Chapter III; 14-3(f)(vii))
  7. Proprietary Information
    1. All information contained herein is considered proprietary by PACRA. Hence, none of the information in this document can be copied or otherwise reproduced, stored, or disseminated in whole or in part in any form or by any means whatsoever by any person without PACRA’s prior written consent.

Nov-26

www.pacra.com