Rating History
Dissemination Date Long-Term Rating Short-Term Rating Outlook Action Rating Watch
11-Nov-26 BBB A2 Stable Maintain -
19-Nov-25 BBB A2 Stable Maintain -
29-Nov-24 BBB A2 Stable Upgrade -
21-Dec-23 BBB- A2 Stable Maintain -
21-Dec-22 BBB- A2 Stable Initial -
About the Entity

Swat Agro Chemicals (‘Swat Agro’ or ‘the Business’) was established in 1996 as a partnership concern under the Partnership Act, 1932. Ownership rests with three partners: Mr. Barkat Ali Khan holds the major stake (~50%), while the remaining ~50% is held equally by Ms. Fouzia Nazneen and Mr. Muhammad Alam Khan. Mr. Barkat Ali Khan leads the Business as CEO and is supported by an experienced management team.

Rating Rationale

The assigned ratings of Swat Agro Chemicals (‘Swat Agro’ or ‘the Business’) derive strength from the sponsor’s extensive experience in the pesticide industry and the Business’s established domestic presence, underpinned by a diversified product portfolio spanning insecticides, fertilizers, micronutrients, fungicides, household products, weedicides, adjuvants and agri-equipment. The ratings draw further support from a strategic collaboration with BASF and the successful operation of the Business’s state-of-the-art SC and EC formulation plant, complemented by ongoing expansion into seed development, packaging and real estate. The Business is currently transitioning from a partnership to a corporate structure through two companies, Swat Agro Chemicals (Pvt.) Ltd (‘SAC Pvt.’) and Altiga Agri Solutions (Pvt.) Ltd (‘Altiga’), with operations being gradually shifted from the AOP to these entities. On the governance front, Swat Agro Chemicals is audited by Dilroze Khan & Co., Chartered Accountants, while SAC Pvt. and Altiga have appointed a QCR-rated auditor. The Business has consistently maintained a sustainable risk profile. Its sales mix is led by fertilizers (~30%), insecticides (~28%) and micronutrients (~25%), followed by household products (~10%), fungicides (~6%) and weedicides (~1%). In FY26, the AOP recorded sales of Rs. 3.08bn (FY25: Rs. 7.12bn), SAC Pvt. Rs. 6.02bn (FY25: Rs. 1.05bn) and Altiga Rs. 2.29bn (FY25: Rs. 1.50bn), taking the Group’s aggregate sales to Rs. 11.39bn (FY25: Rs. 9.67bn). The Business sustained healthy gross margins of ~35% (FY25: ~33%), translating into a net profit of Rs. 634mn (FY25: Rs. 1.07bn). At the Group level, gross margin improved to ~36% (FY25: ~33%), while net profit declined to Rs. 1.03bn (FY25: Rs. 1.19bn), owing to higher operating expenses and corporate taxation at the company level. Working capital requirements are met through a mix of internal cash flows and short-term borrowings, some of which are interchangeable between the AOP and the companies. The capital structure remains adequate, with sound coverage metrics, as the Business carries no long-term debt and its borrowings are entirely working capital in nature.

Key Rating Drivers

The ratings depend on Swat Agro’s ability to sustain, and preferably improve, its operational and financial profile, alongside a successful transition to the envisaged corporate structure. Moreover, strengthening the governance framework, enhancing financial transparency and developing effective internal controls remain key to the ratings.

Profile
Legal Structure

Swat Agro Chemicals (“Swat Agro” or “the AOP”) was established in 1996 as a partnership concern under the Partnership Act, 1932, and is principally engaged in the purchase and sale of agrochemicals and allied products.


Background

Mr. Barkat Ali, the founder of Swat Agro, entered the business in the early 1980s by importing pesticides from the UAE for use on his farms in Swat. During the 1990s, he formalized the business operations by establishing Swat Agro and commencing the commercial distribution of pesticides. Initially, Swat Agro’s distribution network was limited to Peshawar; however, it gradually expanded its geographical presence to Balochistan, Punjab, and Sindh. Over time, the business was extended through two incorporated entities, SAC and Altiga, with the AOP investing ~PKR 2.0bln in them.


Operations

The Group is engaged in the import, marketing and distribution of crop protection and nutrition products, including pesticides, insecticides, fungicides, weedicides, fertilizers, micronutrients and adjuvants. It operates through the AOP, SAC and Altiga. SAC markets these products to farmers across Pakistan through its sales team, while Altiga, based in Quetta, imports and distributes products sourced from the USA, Japan, Italy and Spain. The AOP is primarily engaged in the marketing and distribution of agricultural and public health products, including plant growth regulators. It has an extensive distribution network, structured into regions, zones, and territories, supported by six supply chain centers across the country. Its formulation and packing facility, located near Kasur, is equipped with high-quality processing units for the production and packaging of SC, EC, and granular pesticides. In addition, the AOP maintains multiple warehouses across Pakistan to facilitate efficient storage and distribution. Its head office is located in Peshawar, while its corporate office is situated in Lahore.


Ownership
Ownership Structure

Swat Agro's ownership is divided among three partners, where Mr. Barkat Ali Khan holds about 50%, Mr. M. Alam Khan about 25% and Ms. Fozia Nazneen about 25%.


Stability

The ownership structure is expected to remain stable going forward, with a significant stake held by Mr. Barkat Ali Khan. Moreover, the gradual induction of the second generation into the Business is expected to further strengthen ownership stability and support continuity.


Business Acumen

Mr. Barkat Ali Khan, the founding partner, possesses approximately three decades of professional experience in the pesticide sector. His extensive exposure to local and international markets as a dealer is expected to provide operational synergies and support the Business’s growth going forward.


Financial Strength

The sponsors possess a sound financial standing and are considered capable of extending financial support to the Business, if required.


Governance
Board Structure

Swat Agro is not regulatory bounded to setup a formal Board of Directors (BoD). However, all the partners of the Business remain responsible for the operation and making pertinent decisions.


Members’ Profile

Swat Agro's partners Mr. Barkat, Mr. Alam, and Mrs. Fauzia are experienced professionals and have been involved in the Business since its inception. Mr. Barkat holds ~3 decades of experience in the pesticides sector.


Board Effectiveness

The partners are assisted by two committees, namely, the Core and Tax committees, for decision-making and policy formation of Swat Agro. The Core committee comprises the CFO and Manager Finance; while the Tax committee comprises the CFO, Head of Tax, Manager Finance. These committees meet as per requirement, while no formal minutes are documented.


Financial Transparency

Dilroze Khan & Co., Chartered Accountants, are the external auditors of the Business. The firm is not QCR rated. Tt has expressed an unqualified opinion on the financial statements as of FY26. The Business has further transitioned two entities, Swat Agro Chemicals (Pvt.) Ltd. and Altiga Agri Solutions (Pvt.) Ltd., whose financial statements for FY25 were audited by RSM Avais Hyder Liaquat Nauman, Chartered Accountants, a QCR-rated audit firm. The firm has expressed unqualified opinions on the financial statements of both entities.


Management
Organizational Structure

Swat Agro operates through four departments: Sales & Marketing, Administration, IT, and Finance & Accounts. The heads of all departments report to the Chief Operating Officer (COO), who, in turn, reports to the Chief Executive Officer (CEO).


Management Team

Mr. Barkat, the CEO, possesses approximately three decades of professional experience in the local and international pesticide markets, primarily as a dealer. Mr. Wajid Gul, the CFO, has nearly two decades of overall professional experience and has been associated with the Business since 2009. The management team comprises experienced professionals with extensive industry knowledge.


Effectiveness

The Business currently operates without formal management-level committees. As part of its ongoing corporate structuring, the establishment of dedicated management committees would help strengthen oversight, streamline decision-making, and enhance management effectiveness.


MIS

The Business prepares detailed Excel-based reports covering individual segment and product performance, which are shared with senior management on a weekly, monthly, and quarterly basis. The reporting framework may be further strengthened through the introduction of real-time performance monitoring tools to facilitate timely tracking of operational and financial performance.


Control Environment

Swat Agro operates a technologically advanced formulation plant certified under ISO 9001:2015 and ISO 17025:2005 standards. However, the Business lacks a formal internal audit function, which is required to strengthen internal controls and enhance monitoring.


Business Risk
Industry Dynamics

Pakistan’s pesticides sector recorded revenue of PKR ~55.2 billion in 6MFY26, up ~5.0% YoY (6MFY25: PKR ~52.5 billion). The growth was primarily driven by higher domestic pesticide prices, which increased by ~14.3%, and a rebound in imports, despite relatively stable cotton production at ~7.05 million bales (FY25: ~7.08 million bales). In volumetric terms, pesticide imports stood at ~49,800 MT in FY26 (FY25: ~31,283 MT), while import value increased by ~37.5% YoY to USD ~213 million. Gross margins improved to ~30.6% in 6MFY26 (6MFY25: ~27.5%). Imports of base ingredients for pesticides amounted to PKR ~37,411 million in FY25 (FY24: PKR ~47,700 million). During FY26, Pakistan imported ~53.0% of its pesticides from China, followed by Germany (~6.6%), South Korea (~7.3%), Indonesia (~4.5%), the USA (~4.0%), and France (~3.7%).


Relative Position

The Group holds a market share of ~5% and is among the leading local players in the sector, while international players lead the sector.


Revenues

The AOP’s revenue is primarily derived from fertilizers (~30%), followed by insecticides (~28%), micronutrients (~25%), household products (~10%), fungicides (~6%) and weedicides (~1%). During FY26, the AOP recorded revenue of ~PKR 3.1bln (FY25: ~PKR 7.1bln), reflecting a decline of ~57%, as trading activities shifted towards Swat Agro Chemicals (Pvt.) Limited (“SAC Pvt.”) and Altiga Agri Solutions (Pvt.) Limited (“Altiga”). SAC Pvt. recorded revenue of ~PKR 6.0bln (FY25: ~PKR 1.0bln), while Altiga’s revenue increased by ~53% to ~PKR 2.3bln (FY25: ~PKR 1.5bln). On a combined group basis, revenue increased by ~18% to ~PKR 11.4bln (FY25: ~PKR 9.7bln). Going forward, revenue growth is expected to remain modest in the near term, contingent upon recovery in agricultural demand and stabilization of input costs.


Margins

Margins reflected a mixed trend during FY26. The AOP’s gross margin improved to ~35% (FY25: ~33%), while its operating margin increased to ~22% (FY25: ~15%), supported by lower administrative expenses. At the Group level, gross margin also improved to ~36% (FY25: ~34%); however, operating margin declined to ~11% (FY25: ~13%), mainly due to higher selling and staff costs at the corporate entities.


Sustainability

Going forward, the sponsors are gradually shifting business operations from the AOP to the already incorporated private limited entities, SAC Pvt. and Altiga. This transition is aimed at expanding the corporate structure and supporting diversification into new business lines, including packaging plants, alongside further expansion in the real estate segment. The AOP has invested ~PKR 2.0bln in these entities (~PKR 1.0bln each).


Financial Risk
Working capital

The Group’s working capital position improved during FY26, with net working capital days declining to ~208 days (FY25: ~281 days). At the entity level, the AOP’s inventory days increased significantly to ~526 days (FY25: ~230 days), with inventory of ~PKR 2.9bln remaining against a lower revenue base. However, receivable days improved to ~78 days (FY25: ~145 days). The Group’s current ratio remained adequate at ~4.0x (FY25: ~4.1x), supported by cash and bank balances of ~PKR 344mln (FY25: ~PKR 165mln).


Coverages

The AOP maintained a strong coverage profile during FY26, with interest coverage standing at ~11.9x (FY25: ~13.9x). At the Group level, interest coverage improved slightly to ~15.0x (FY25: ~14.5x), while FCFO remained broadly stable at ~PKR 1.4bln. Total finance cost declined to ~PKR 85mln (FY25: ~PKR 92mln).


Capitalization

The Group maintains a relatively low-leverage capital structure, with a leveraging ratio of ~9% in FY26 (FY25: ~7%). At the entity level, the AOP’s leveraging ratio stood at ~5.0% (FY25: ~8.0%), with total borrowings, including lease liabilities, of ~PKR 344mln (FY25: ~PKR 555mln), of which short-term borrowings were ~PKR 117mln (FY25: ~PKR 420mln). The AOP’s Habib Bank trade lines are interchangeable with SAC, which carried FATR of ~PKR 366mln at end-FY26. Long-term borrowings comprise only vehicle lease liabilities of ~PKR 118mln (FY25: ~PKR 92mln), with a current maturity of ~PKR 109mln (FY25: ~PKR 44mln). Going forward, the Group is expected to maintain a relatively low-leverage profile, supported by its sizeable equity base and limited reliance on borrowings.


 
 

Nov-26

www.pacra.com


(PKR mln)


Jun-26
12M
Jun-25
12M
Jun-24
12M
Audited Audited Audited
A. BALANCE SHEET
1. Non-Current Assets 1,376 1,281 1,185
2. Investments 0 0 0
3. Related Party Exposure 2,000 0 0
4. Current Assets 3,746 6,947 6,328
a. Inventories 3,005 3,892 3,549
b. Trade Receivables 662 2,829 2,454
5. Total Assets 7,122 8,228 7,513
6. Current Liabilities 223 1,327 1,122
a. Trade Payables 195 1,146 1,008
7. Borrowings 344 555 565
8. Related Party Exposure 0 0 0
9. Non-Current Liabilities 0 0 0
10. Net Assets 6,556 6,346 5,826
11. Shareholders' Equity 6,556 6,346 5,826
B. INCOME STATEMENT
1. Sales 3,080 7,119 8,987
a. Cost of Good Sold (1,993) (4,781) (5,063)
2. Gross Profit 1,086 2,338 3,924
a. Operating Expenses (414) (1,254) (1,533)
3. Operating Profit 673 1,084 2,391
a. Non Operating Income or (Expense) 19 69 67
4. Profit or (Loss) before Interest and Tax 691 1,153 2,458
a. Total Finance Cost (58) (83) (60)
b. Taxation 0 0 0
6. Net Income Or (Loss) 634 1,071 2,398
C. CASH FLOW STATEMENT
a. Free Cash Flows from Operations (FCFO) 760 1,163 2,477
b. Net Cash from Operating Activities before Working Capital Changes 760 1,163 2,477
c. Changes in Working Capital 2,038 (465) (2,203)
1. Net Cash provided by Operating Activities 2,798 698 274
2. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Investing Activities (2,221) (189) (197)
3. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Financing Activities (700) (597) (17)
4. Net Cash generated or (Used) during the period (124) (88) 60
D. RATIO ANALYSIS
1. Performance
a. Sales Growth (for the period) -56.7% -20.8% 60.1%
b. Gross Profit Margin 35.3% 32.8% 43.7%
c. Net Profit Margin 20.6% 15.0% 26.7%
d. Cash Conversion Efficiency (FCFO adjusted for Working Capital/Sales) 90.8% 9.8% 3.0%
e. Return on Equity [ Net Profit Margin * Asset Turnover * (Total Assets/Shareholders' Equity )] 9.8% 17.6% 50.3%
2. Working Capital Management
a. Gross Working Capital (Average Days) 616 326 192
b. Net Working Capital (Average Days) 536 271 156
c. Current Ratio (Current Assets / Current Liabilities) 16.8 5.2 5.6
3. Coverages
a. EBITDA / Finance Cost 24.8 45.4 97.8
b. FCFO / Finance Cost+CMLTB+Excess STB 5.4 16.8 76.7
c. Debt Payback (Total Borrowings+Excess STB) / (FCFO-Finance Cost) 0.3 0.1 0.0
4. Capital Structure
a. Total Borrowings / (Total Borrowings+Shareholders' Equity) 5.0% 8.0% 8.8%
b. Interest or Markup Payable (Days) 0.0 0.0 0.0
c. Entity Average Borrowing Rate 6.8% 4.6% 5.9%

Nov-26

www.pacra.com

Nov-26

www.pacra.com

  1. Rating Team Statements
    1. Rating is just an opinion about the creditworthiness of the entity and does not constitute a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell any security of the entity rated or to buy, hold, or sell the security rated, as the case may be. (Chapter III; 14-3-(x))
    2. Conflict of Interest
      1. The Rating Team or any of their family members have no interest in this rating (Chapter III; 12-2-(j))
      2. PACRA, the analysts involved in the rating process, and members of its rating committee and their family members do not have any conflict of interest relating to the rating done by them (Chapter III; 12-2-(e) & (k))
      3. The analyst is not a substantial shareholder of the customer being rated by PACRA [Annexure F; d-(ii)]
      4. Explanation: for the purpose of the above clause, the term "family members" shall include only those family members who are dependent on the analyst and members of the rating committee.
  2. Restrictions
    1. No director, officer, or employee of PACRA communicates the information acquired by him for use for rating purposes to any other person, except where required under law to do so. (Chapter III; 10-(5))
    2. PACRA does not disclose or discuss with outside parties or make improper use of the non-public information which has come to its knowledge during a business relationship with the customer. (Chapter III; 10-7-(d))
    3. PACRA does not make proposals or recommendations regarding the activities of rated entities that could impact a credit rating of the entity subject to rating. (Chapter III; 10-7-(k))
  3. Conduct of Business
    1. PACRA fulfills its obligations in a fair, efficient, transparent, and ethical manner and renders high standards of services in performing its functions and obligations. (Chapter III; 11-A-(a))
    2. PACRA uses due care in the preparation of this Rating Report. Our information has been obtained from sources we consider to be reliable, but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. PACRA does not, in every instance, independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing this Rating Report. (Clause 11-(A)(p))
    3. PACRA prohibits its employees and analysts from soliciting money, gifts, or favors from anyone with whom PACRA conducts business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(q))
    4. PACRA ensures before the commencement of the rating process that an analyst or employee has not had a recent employment or other significant business or personal relationship with the rated entity that may cause or may be perceived as causing a conflict of interest. (Chapter III; 11-A-(r))
    5. PACRA maintains the principle of integrity in seeking rating business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(u))
    6. PACRA promptly investigates in the event of misconduct or a breach of the policies, procedures, and controls, and takes appropriate steps to rectify any weaknesses to prevent any recurrence, along with suitable punitive action against the responsible employee(s). (Chapter III; 11-B-(m))
  4. Independence & Conflict of Interest
    1. PACRA receives compensation from the entity being rated or any third party for the rating services it offers. The receipt of this compensation has no influence on PACRA’s opinions or other analytical processes. In all instances, PACRA is committed to preserving the objectivity, integrity, and independence of its ratings. Our relationship is governed by two distinct mandates: i) rating mandate - signed with the entity being rated or issuer of the debt instrument, and ii) fee mandate - signed with the payer, which can be different from the entity.
    2. PACRA does not provide consultancy/advisory services or other services to any of its customers or their associated companies and associated undertakings that are being rated or have been rated by it during the preceding three years, unless it has an adequate mechanism in place ensuring that the provision of such services does not lead to a conflict of interest situation with its rating activities. (Chapter III; 12-2-(d))
    3. PACRA discloses that no shareholder directly or indirectly holding 10% or more of the share capital of PACRA also holds directly or indirectly 10% or more of the share capital of the entity which is subject to rating or the entity which issued the instrument subject to rating by PACRA. (Chapter III; 12-2-(f))
    4. PACRA ensures that the rating assigned to an entity or instrument is not affected by the existence of a business relationship between PACRA and the entity or any other party, or the non-existence of such a relationship. (Chapter III; 12-2-(i))
    5. PACRA ensures that the analysts or any of their family members shall not buy, sell, or engage in any transaction in any security which falls in the analyst’s area of primary analytical responsibility. This clause, however, does not apply to investments in securities through collective investment schemes. (Chapter III; 12-2-(l))
    6. PACRA has established policies and procedures governing investments and trading in securities by its employees and for monitoring the same to prevent insider trading, market manipulation, or any other market abuse. (Chapter III; 11-B-(g))
  5. Monitoring and Review
    1. PACRA monitors all the outstanding ratings continuously, and any potential change therein due to any event associated with the issuer, the security arrangement, the industry, etc., is disseminated to the market immediately and in an effective manner after appropriate consultation with the entity/issuer. (Chapter III; 17-(a))
    2. PACRA reviews all the outstanding ratings periodically on an annual basis. Provided that public dissemination of annual review and in an instance of change in rating will be made. (Chapter III; 17-(b))
    3. PACRA initiates an immediate review of the outstanding rating upon becoming aware of any information that may reasonably be expected to result in downgrading of the rating. (Chapter III; 17-(c))
    4. PACRA engages with the issuer and the debt securities trustee to remain updated on all information pertaining to the rating of the entity/instrument. (Chapter III; 17-(d))
  6. Probability of Default
    1. PACRA’s Rating Scale reflects the expectation of credit risk. The highest rating has the lowest relative likelihood of default (i.e., probability). PACRA’s transition studies capture the historical performance behavior of a specific rating notch. Transition behavior of the assigned rating can be obtained from PACRA’s Transition Study available at our website. (www.pacra.com) However, the actual transition of rating may not follow the pattern observed in the past. (Chapter III; 14-3(f)(vii))
  7. Proprietary Information
    1. All information contained herein is considered proprietary by PACRA. Hence, none of the information in this document can be copied or otherwise reproduced, stored, or disseminated in whole or in part in any form or by any means whatsoever by any person without PACRA’s prior written consent.

Nov-26

www.pacra.com