Rating History
Dissemination Date Long-Term Rating Short-Term Rating Outlook Action Rating Watch
25-Sep-26 AA- A1 Stable Upgrade -
26-Sep-25 A+ A1 Stable Maintain -
26-Sep-24 A+ A1 Stable Maintain -
26-Sep-23 A+ A1 Stable Maintain -
30-Sep-22 A+ A1 Stable Maintain -
About the Entity

Master Group, established in 1963, is a diversified Pakistani business group with presence across bedding, textiles, engineering, automobiles, retail and energy. Master Wind Energy Limited (MWEL), incorporated in 2005, operates a 52.8MW wind power project in Jhimpir, Sindh, which commenced commercial operations in 2016. The project was financed through a mix of local and foreign debt, which was fully repaid in August 2026. MWEL is led by an experienced management team, with majority representation from the Master Group on its Board.

Rating Rationale

The rating upgrade of Master Wind Energy Limited (“MWEL” or the “Company”) is primarily driven by the complete payoff of its project debt within this period, eliminating long-term leverage obligations and fundamentally strengthening the Company’s balance sheet alongside a robust regulated operating framework. Revenue visibility remains supported by a 20-year Energy Purchase Agreement (“EPA”) with CPPA-G, backed by sovereign guarantees under the Implementation Agreement. The Company has officially signed the amendment agreement with CPPA-G, which will slightly impact overall profitability; however, MWEL is projected to carry healthy margins going forward while benefiting from improved tariff clarity and structured receivable settlements. Wind variability remains an inherent risk, though operational risk is well-managed via a long-term O&M contract with General Electric International Inc. In FY26, net delivered generation rose to 105.14 GWh (FY25: 95.37 GWh), pushing top-line revenue to PKR 4,738mln (FY25: PKR 4,023mln). Plant availability stood at 98.90%, well clear of the contractual benchmark. The Company’s liquidity profile remains solid, backed by healthy internal cash generation, FCFO standing at PKR 3,734mln (FY25: PKR 3,102mln), and non-reliance on short term credit facilities The ratings also draw strength from MWEL’s parentage, the Master Group, which provides ongoing strategic oversight and strong financial backing.

Key Rating Drivers

The ratings remain dependent on the Company's ability to sustain operational performance in line with contractual benchmarks, maintain prudent financial metrics, and ensure continued financial discipline.

Profile
Plant

Master Wind Energy Limited (“MWEL”) was incorporated in Pakistan on May 03, 2005, and subsequently converted into a public limited company on July 01, 2011. The Company operates a wind power project located in Jhimpir, District Thatta, Sindh, on land leased from the Alternative Energy Development Board (AEDB), Government of Pakistan. The project represents the Master Group’s first investment in the energy sector. Initially commissioned with an installed capacity of 49.5 MW, the plant’s capacity was subsequently enhanced to 52.8 MW through software upgrades.


Tariff

The project is being developed under the Upfront Tariff Regime announced by the Government in 2013. Under this framework, the feed-in tariff, along with permitted indexations and escalations, remains applicable throughout the 20-year concession period from the date of commercial operations, backed by sovereign guarantees through the Energy Purchase Agreement and Implementation Agreement. As per NEPRA’s 2013 tariff determination for wind IPPs, MWEL was awarded a levelized tariff of US¢15.1088 (PKR 14.7462) per kWh for years 1–20, with the applicable tariff for July-September FY26 standing at PKR 39.9719 per kWh. Following the Amendment Agreement, the O&M component has been revised, the revised O&M tariff component is applicable from November 24, 2025.


Return on Project

Following the Amendment Agreement, the Company’s ROE component reduced from 17% to 15.725%


Ownership
Ownership Structure

The Company is a wholly owned subsidiary of the Master Group, which is jointly owned by three brothers, with their respective family interests held either directly or through special purpose vehicles (SPVs). MWEL’s shareholding comprises 36.33% held by individual shareholders, while the remaining 63.67% is held through associated companies. The latter includes N.M. Holding Private Ltd. (16.33%), Najeeb Holdings Private Ltd. (17.33%), Procon Engineering Private Ltd. (15%), and Master Textile Mills Ltd. (15%).


Stability

The Company’s business stability is supported by the long-term contractual arrangement with the power purchaser, which provides visibility and predictability to its revenue and cash flows. This is further complemented by a stable ownership structure, with MWEL being wholly owned by the Master Group and the sponsors’ interests held among the three sponsoring families, either directly or through associated companies. The continuity of the ownership structure reflects the sponsors’ sustained commitment to the Company and their long-term interest in the energy business. The sponsors’ continued expansion within the renewable energy space, including through another venture under the name Master Green Energy, further reinforces their commitment to the sector. Overall, the established ownership structure and continued sponsor involvement provide comfort regarding the Company’s strategic direction and long-term stability.


Business Acumen

The sponsor group possesses extensive business experience across a diversified portfolio spanning foam products, chemicals, textiles, engineering, wind power, home fashion, automobiles, and real estate. The Group’s presence in the automobile sector includes Master Motors Limited, which is engaged in the assembly, manufacturing, and distribution of commercial and passenger vehicles in Pakistan through collaborations with international automotive brands. The Group has also established IMM REIT Management Company Limited, with a focus on residential real estate development. The sponsors’ diversified operations and established presence across multiple sectors demonstrate their experience in managing large-scale businesses and support their ability to provide strategic direction to the Company.


Financial Strength

The sponsors’ financial strength is underpinned by the established and diversified profile of the Master Group, which has a longstanding presence across multiple sectors of the economy. The Group’s diversified business portfolio provides an earnings base across different industries, thereby reducing reliance on any single business segment. The sponsors have also demonstrated the ability to establish and sustain businesses across capital-intensive sectors, reflecting their capacity to mobilize financial resources and manage long-term investments. The Group’s established market position, diversified operations, and track record of business growth provide comfort regarding the sponsors’ ability to support MWEL, particularly in meeting any unforeseen financial or operational requirements. The sponsors’ financial standing, coupled with their continued commitment to the Company and presence in the energy sector, provides an added layer of support to MWEL’s overall credit profile.


Governance
Board Structure

MWEL’s BoD comprises eight members, including the Chairman and Managing Director. Of these, three are executive directors, three are non-executive directors, and two are independent directors. Five board members represent the Master Group, and the Board also includes one female director in line with governance requirements. While the Company is not listed on the Pakistan Stock Exchange (PSX), its Board is fully compliant with the Code of Corporate Governance.


Members’ Profile

The Board is chaired by Mr. Naveed Malik, who brings nearly four decades of experience with the Master Group, having held senior leadership positions across its businesses. The Board also includes Mr. Najeeb Malik, Managing Director of Master Textile Mills Limited, with around three decades of experience and deep involvement in the Group’s companies, and Mr. Nadeem Malik, Managing Director of Procon Engineering and Master Motor Corporation, who contributes over 30 years of expertise in the engineering and automobile sectors. Mr. Shahzad Malik, CEO of MWEL and Managing Director of Master Group, is also leading Dura Industries and Master Green Energy, has approximately 15 years of experience in both the foam and power sectors, reflecting the Group’s diversification into energy. Day-to-day operations are further supported by Mr. Rumman Arshad Dar, Director and Chief Operating Officer of MWEL, has long association with the Compnay and brings extensive expertise in the power sector. Independent oversight is provided by Mr. Aamir Fayyaz Shaikh, a businessman with experience in textiles, and Mr. Shahab A. Khawaja, a former government official, both serving as independent directors for the past 6 years. Female representation is ensured through Ms. Natalia Malik, a businesswoman and sponsor family representative.


Board Effectiveness

The diverse experience of the Board members plays a pivotal role in guiding management toward the development of effective operational and financial policies. Their collective expertise, combining long-standing sponsor leadership with independent oversight, provides strategic direction and strengthens governance to the Company.



Financial Transparency

A.F. Ferguson & Co., Chartered Accountants, is the external auditor of the Company. The auditor issued an unqualified opinion on the Company’s financial statements for the year ended June 2026, indicating a true and fair view of the financial position. The audit firm is QCR rated and is listed on the State Bank of Pakistan's panel of auditors in Category A, reflecting a satisfactory level of professional standing. The accounting framework applied is consistent with applicable financial reporting standards.


Management
Organizational Structure

MWEL follows a lean organizational structure, with management primarily focused on financial and administrative functions. The operations and maintenance of the plant are outsourced to General Electric International Inc. Ltd. under a long-term O&M contract, ensuring operational efficiency and reliability.


Management Team

Mr. Shahzad Malik, CEO of MWEL and Managing Director of Master Group, leads the Company with direct reporting to the Board, bringing strong Group-level experience and strategic oversight. He is supported by Mr. Rumman Arshad Dar, Chief Operating Officer, who has nearly two decades of professional experience, including a decade with MWEL and six years as COO, contributing sector-specific expertise in power and finance. Plant operations are overseen by Mr. Syed Shahzad Ali, General Manager, who has over two decades of industry experience and nine years with MWEL, and is responsible for coordinating with General Electric International Inc. Ltd. under the O&M contract. Collectively, the management team demonstrates stability, technical competence, and the capability to ensure effective operations within a lean organizational framework.


Effectiveness

The Company’s management demonstrates efficiency through a structured and systematic decision-making process that has contributed to consistent operational outcomes. The team not only provides strategic oversight but also ensures knowledge transfer and capacity building at the plant level by maintaining a dedicated engineering staff. Regular bi-weekly and monthly coordination meetings with GE’s O&M personnel further strengthen technical expertise and operational reliability. This approach reflects management’s commitment to continuous improvement, efficient resource utilization, and long-term sustainability of plant operations.


Control Environment

The Company maintains a sound control environment, supported by an efficient Management Information System (MIS). The MIS provides real-time plant production data, allowing management to closely monitor operations and make timely, informed decisions. This strengthens transparency, facilitates accountability, and ensures effective oversight of day-to-day performance. Beyond MIS, the Company’s lean organizational structure, clear reporting lines, and regular coordination with the O&M contractor further reinforce operational discipline and risk management. Collectively, these practices contribute to a robust control framework, enhancing both efficiency and governance.


Operational Risk
Power Purchase Agreement

MWEL operates under the framework of the Renewable Energy Policy 2006. In line with this policy, the Company achieved its COD in October 2016 and executed a 20-year Energy Purchase Agreement (EPA) with the Central Power Purchasing Agency (Guarantee) Limited (CPPA-G). Under this agreement, all electricity generated is supplied to the national grid. The EPA remains effective until October 2036, providing long-term revenue visibility and stability by securing the Company’s off-take arrangements for the entire concession period. Following the Amendment Agreement, the revised O&M tariff component is applicable from November 24, 2025, with the Company’s ROE component reduced from 17% to 15.725% and exchange-rate indexation on ROE discontinued, while the O&M and insurance cost mechanisms were also revised. The agreement further provides for settlement of PKR 1,246mln in outstanding receivables and reduces delayed payment mark-up to KIBOR +1%. Under the EPA, the Company is required to generate electricity in line with the benchmark generation while maintaining the required efficiency. Any decline in generation due to efficiency shortfalls is not compensated by the power purchaser. However, in the event of curtailment of offtake by CPPA-G, the Company is compensated for the missed volumes, referred to as Non-Project Missed Volumes (NPMV).


Operation and Maintenance

For the initial two years of operations, the O&M services were provided by Zhejiang Huadong Engineering Science & Technology Development Company Ltd., under sub-operation by General Electric (GE). Subsequently, the O&M contract was transitioned to General Electric International Inc., which continues to manage the plant’s operations and maintenance. Under the terms of the contract, GE is responsible for ensuring the efficient performance of the plant. Any decline in generation arising from plant inefficiencies is subject to liquidated damages (LD), which are charged to GE.


Resource Risk

The Company’s revenues are subject to seasonality due to variations in wind speeds, with higher generation typically observed during the March–September period. Resource variability risk, unique to renewable energy IPPs, arises from their reliance on wind as a key resource, making them inherently exposed to wind risk. Under the Upfront Tariff Regime and the Renewable Energy Policy 2006, the Company fully absorbs the risk associated with wind variability. Consequently, the Company’s revenues and cash flows are directly affected by wind speed variations, which impact electricity generation and may result in fluctuations in cash flows. However, as per the Energy Purchase Agreement, if the plant remains available at its contracted capacity and is ready to deliver electricity, CPPA-G is obligated to pay the full tariff irrespective of actual offtake. This arrangement mitigates demand-side risk while providing revenue protection.


Insurance Cover

The Company has sound insurance coverage for property damage and business interruption. The insured values for damages include a property damage cover (up to PKR 0.7bln) & business interruption cover (up to PKR 3bln).


Performance Risk
Industry Dynamics

In Mar'26, Pakistan's total power generation rose to 8,939 GWh, reflecting a strong YoY increase of 6.3% from 8,409 GWh in Mar'25, and a MoM increase of 16.2% from 7,696 GWh in Feb'26 (largely seasonal). For 9MFY26, cumulative generation reached 93,131 GWh, up 3.3% YoY. Generation exceeded the NEPRA reference level during the month attributed to lower industrial tariffs, a shift of industrial consumers back onto the national grid, incremental consumption packages for industrial and agricultural users, and improved economic activity (LSM up 5.9% YoY in 8MFY26) and in fact marked the third-highest March output on record. The generation mix shifted notably: hydel generation surged 62.3% YoY to 2,105 GWh (24% share, up from 15% in Mar'25), driven by higher demand and reduced RLNG/nuclear output; imported coal jumped 126% YoY to 1,234 GWh (14% share, up from 6%); local coal rose 8% YoY to 1,498 GWh (17% share); wind generation increased 34% YoY to 309 GWh (3% share); while RLNG-based generation fell sharply by 67% YoY to just 504 GWh (6% share, down from 18%) amid supply disruptions linked to the US-Iran conflict, with only 2 of 8 scheduled cargoes imported. Nuclear generation declined 11.7% YoY to 1,962 GWh (22% share, down from 26%), likely due to annual technical outages at Chashma-III and KANUPP (K-3). Solar output edged down 12% YoY to 106 GWh (1% share), while RFO output rose sharply (up 23x YoY, from a very low base) and gas rose modestly (+4% YoY to 1,014 GWh). On the cost side, the adjusted fuel cost in Mar'26 stood at PKR 8.26/kWh, slightly above the NEPRA reference cost of PKR 8.00/kWh, resulting in a modest positive Fuel Charges Adjustment (FCA) of PKR 0.27/kWh — kept low by a comparatively favourable energy mix despite elevated oil prices. Notably, the March power generation cost itself was down 14.6% YoY, from PKR 9.46/kWh in Mar'25 to PKR 8.08/kWh in Mar'26. Generation trends from Dec'25–Mar'26 point to improving grid stability and a better outlook for future quarterly tariff adjustments, aided by lower industrial tariffs and higher levies on captive gas, though risks remain from prolonged RLNG disruptions tied to the US-Iran conflict, which could push FCAs and tariffs higher or trigger load shedding. NEPRA projects overall power demand to grow by 1.0% YoY in CY26.


Generation

In FY26, the Company’s net delivered electrical output increased to 105.14 GWh from 95.37 GWh in FY25, reflecting an improvement of approximately 9.2%. The recovery was supported by stronger wind resource availability in several months and higher offtake. Revenue rose correspondingly to PKR 4,738 million from PKR 4,023 million in the prior year. While residual curtailments and seasonal variations continued,the higher generation base contributed to a more robust top-line performance compared with the weaker FY25 outcome.


Performance Benchmark

Under the EPA, MWEL is required to maintain a plant availability of 95%. During FY26, average availability remained high at 98.90%, in line with agreed parameters.Electricity generation increased to 105.14 GWh, compared to the benchmark generation of 142 GWh, resulting in a capacity factor of 22.73% against the benchmark of 31%, with an overall generation efficiency of 72.39%.


Financial Risk
Financing Structure Analysis

Project debt originally comprised approximately 75% of the total project cost (USD 99.2 million equivalent), split equally between foreign and local sources. The foreign tranche of USD 49.6 million was provided by the International Development Finance Corporation (IDFC, formerly OPIC), while local financing of PKR 5,456 million was arranged through a consortium led by Meezan Bank, Bank Al Habib, Bank of Punjab and Habib Metropolitan Bank. By 30 June 2026, the vast majority of both facilities had been repaid. At 30 June 2026 only a residual current portion of approximately PKR 975 million remained outstanding, with long-term finances fully extinguished. As of August 2026 the company has fully repiad all of its oustanding debt. 


Liquidity Profile

MWEL continues to benefit from the take-or-pay structure under the EPA, which provides revenue protection against demand-side risk, although cash flows remain partially exposed to plant availability and seasonal wind variations. At year-end FY26, the Company held cash and bank balances of PKR 1,873 million and carried no short-term working capital borrowings. Interest coverage strengthened further as finance costs declined sharply. The strong equity base and continued dividend distributions (PKR 1,318 million in FY26) underscore a healthy liquidity position and the ability to return capital while completing debt amortisation.


Working Capital Financing

MWEL continues to operate with minimal reliance on external working capital lines, funding its operational requirements almost entirely through internal cash generation and has not utilised any short-term borrowings to date. Payments from CPPA-G are contractually due within 30 days and remain secured by a government guarantee under the Implementation Agreement, with delayed payment markup applicable at 3M KIBOR plus 1%. In FY26, receivable days moderated to approximately 161 days from higher levels in the prior year (FY25: 245 days), reflecting some improvement in collections despite ongoing circular debt pressures in the power sector. The Company holds no inventory, so gross working capital days are driven almost entirely by receivables. On the liability side, trade payables remain limited, resulting in short payable days (26 days) and a continued conservative, cash-driven working capital approach. Overall working capital requirements stay modest, eliminating the need for short-term external financing.


Cash Flow Analysis

During FY26, MWEL generated robust operating cash flows, with free cash flows from operations of 3,734 million. Free cash flow generation remained healthy despite a moderated absolute level relative to earlier peak years, supported by improved gross profit of PKR 2,798 million (FY25: PKR 2,069 million). Current maturity of long-term debt declined sharply to PKR 975 million at year end FY26 (FY25: PKR 2,663 million). With all of the outstandig debt fully repaid as of August 2026, the Company’s residual financial obligations are limited. Dividend payments of PKR 1,318 million during FY26 were maintained alongside significant debt reduction, reflecting the Company’s strong financial position.


Capitalization

During FY26, the Company’s leverage declined sharply to approximately 7.1% from 23.3% in FY25, driven by substantial repayments of project-related loans amounting to PKR 2,683 million. Long-term finances were almost fully extinguished, leaving only a residual current portion of approximately PKR 975 million on the balance sheet. The Company did not raise any additional long-term debt, and the remaining borrowings reflect only the final instalments of the original project financing together with a modest lease liability. Shareholders’ equity strengthened to PKR 13,181 million, further supporting the more conservative capital structure.


 
 

Sep-26

www.pacra.com


(PKR mln)


Jun-26
12M
Jun-25
12M
Jun-24
12M
Audited Audited Audited
A. BALANCE SHEET
1. Non-Current Assets 10,109 11,081 11,874
2. Investments 0 0 0
3. Related Party Exposure 0 0 0
4. Current Assets 4,696 5,137 7,239
a. Inventories 0 0 0
b. Trade Receivables 2,492 1,685 3,721
5. Total Assets 14,805 16,218 19,113
6. Current Liabilities 708 583 653
a. Trade Payables 334 337 205
7. Borrowings 1,005 3,648 5,988
8. Related Party Exposure 0 0 0
9. Non-Current Liabilities 6 3 1
10. Net Assets 13,086 11,984 12,471
11. Shareholders' Equity 13,086 11,984 12,471
B. INCOME STATEMENT
1. Sales 4,738 4,023 6,116
a. Cost of Good Sold (1,940) (1,954) (1,937)
2. Gross Profit 2,798 2,069 4,179
a. Operating Expenses (116) (119) (91)
3. Operating Profit 2,681 1,949 4,088
a. Non Operating Income or (Expense) 54 (549) 182
4. Profit or (Loss) before Interest and Tax 2,735 1,401 4,270
a. Total Finance Cost (281) (619) (1,072)
b. Taxation (33) (69) (88)
6. Net Income Or (Loss) 2,421 712 3,111
C. CASH FLOW STATEMENT
a. Free Cash Flows from Operations (FCFO) 3,734 3,102 5,242
b. Net Cash from Operating Activities before Working Capital Changes 3,452 2,457 4,162
c. Changes in Working Capital (704) 1,343 (311)
1. Net Cash provided by Operating Activities 2,748 3,800 3,852
2. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Investing Activities 36 (100) (52)
3. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Financing Activities (4,058) (3,610) (3,573)
4. Net Cash generated or (Used) during the period (1,274) 90 226
D. RATIO ANALYSIS
1. Performance
a. Sales Growth (for the period) 17.8% -34.2% 42.7%
b. Gross Profit Margin 59.0% 51.4% 68.3%
c. Net Profit Margin 51.1% 17.7% 50.9%
d. Cash Conversion Efficiency (FCFO adjusted for Working Capital/Sales) 64.0% 110.5% 80.6%
e. Return on Equity [ Net Profit Margin * Asset Turnover * (Total Assets/Shareholders' Equity )] 17.7% 5.5% 24.6%
2. Working Capital Management
a. Gross Working Capital (Average Days) 161 245 218
b. Net Working Capital (Average Days) 135 221 204
c. Current Ratio (Current Assets / Current Liabilities) 6.6 8.8 11.1
3. Coverages
a. EBITDA / Finance Cost 14.6 4.9 4.9
b. FCFO / Finance Cost+CMLTB+Excess STB 3.0 1.0 1.5
c. Debt Payback (Total Borrowings+Excess STB) / (FCFO-Finance Cost) 0.3 1.5 1.4
4. Capital Structure
a. Total Borrowings / (Total Borrowings+Shareholders' Equity) 7.1% 23.3% 32.4%
b. Interest or Markup Payable (Days) 17.5 29.3 37.7
c. Entity Average Borrowing Rate 10.2% 11.9% 14.1%

Sep-26

www.pacra.com

Sep-26

www.pacra.com

  1. Rating Team Statements
    1. Rating is just an opinion about the creditworthiness of the entity and does not constitute a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell any security of the entity rated or to buy, hold, or sell the security rated, as the case may be. (Chapter III; 14-3-(x))
    2. Conflict of Interest
      1. The Rating Team or any of their family members have no interest in this rating (Chapter III; 12-2-(j))
      2. PACRA, the analysts involved in the rating process, and members of its rating committee and their family members do not have any conflict of interest relating to the rating done by them (Chapter III; 12-2-(e) & (k))
      3. The analyst is not a substantial shareholder of the customer being rated by PACRA [Annexure F; d-(ii)]
      4. Explanation: for the purpose of the above clause, the term "family members" shall include only those family members who are dependent on the analyst and members of the rating committee.
  2. Restrictions
    1. No director, officer, or employee of PACRA communicates the information acquired by him for use for rating purposes to any other person, except where required under law to do so. (Chapter III; 10-(5))
    2. PACRA does not disclose or discuss with outside parties or make improper use of the non-public information which has come to its knowledge during a business relationship with the customer. (Chapter III; 10-7-(d))
    3. PACRA does not make proposals or recommendations regarding the activities of rated entities that could impact a credit rating of the entity subject to rating. (Chapter III; 10-7-(k))
  3. Conduct of Business
    1. PACRA fulfills its obligations in a fair, efficient, transparent, and ethical manner and renders high standards of services in performing its functions and obligations. (Chapter III; 11-A-(a))
    2. PACRA uses due care in the preparation of this Rating Report. Our information has been obtained from sources we consider to be reliable, but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. PACRA does not, in every instance, independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing this Rating Report. (Clause 11-(A)(p))
    3. PACRA prohibits its employees and analysts from soliciting money, gifts, or favors from anyone with whom PACRA conducts business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(q))
    4. PACRA ensures before the commencement of the rating process that an analyst or employee has not had a recent employment or other significant business or personal relationship with the rated entity that may cause or may be perceived as causing a conflict of interest. (Chapter III; 11-A-(r))
    5. PACRA maintains the principle of integrity in seeking rating business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(u))
    6. PACRA promptly investigates in the event of misconduct or a breach of the policies, procedures, and controls, and takes appropriate steps to rectify any weaknesses to prevent any recurrence, along with suitable punitive action against the responsible employee(s). (Chapter III; 11-B-(m))
  4. Independence & Conflict of Interest
    1. PACRA receives compensation from the entity being rated or any third party for the rating services it offers. The receipt of this compensation has no influence on PACRA’s opinions or other analytical processes. In all instances, PACRA is committed to preserving the objectivity, integrity, and independence of its ratings. Our relationship is governed by two distinct mandates: i) rating mandate - signed with the entity being rated or issuer of the debt instrument, and ii) fee mandate - signed with the payer, which can be different from the entity.
    2. PACRA does not provide consultancy/advisory services or other services to any of its customers or their associated companies and associated undertakings that are being rated or have been rated by it during the preceding three years, unless it has an adequate mechanism in place ensuring that the provision of such services does not lead to a conflict of interest situation with its rating activities. (Chapter III; 12-2-(d))
    3. PACRA discloses that no shareholder directly or indirectly holding 10% or more of the share capital of PACRA also holds directly or indirectly 10% or more of the share capital of the entity which is subject to rating or the entity which issued the instrument subject to rating by PACRA. (Chapter III; 12-2-(f))
    4. PACRA ensures that the rating assigned to an entity or instrument is not affected by the existence of a business relationship between PACRA and the entity or any other party, or the non-existence of such a relationship. (Chapter III; 12-2-(i))
    5. PACRA ensures that the analysts or any of their family members shall not buy, sell, or engage in any transaction in any security which falls in the analyst’s area of primary analytical responsibility. This clause, however, does not apply to investments in securities through collective investment schemes. (Chapter III; 12-2-(l))
    6. PACRA has established policies and procedures governing investments and trading in securities by its employees and for monitoring the same to prevent insider trading, market manipulation, or any other market abuse. (Chapter III; 11-B-(g))
  5. Monitoring and Review
    1. PACRA monitors all the outstanding ratings continuously, and any potential change therein due to any event associated with the issuer, the security arrangement, the industry, etc., is disseminated to the market immediately and in an effective manner after appropriate consultation with the entity/issuer. (Chapter III; 17-(a))
    2. PACRA reviews all the outstanding ratings periodically on an annual basis. Provided that public dissemination of annual review and in an instance of change in rating will be made. (Chapter III; 17-(b))
    3. PACRA initiates an immediate review of the outstanding rating upon becoming aware of any information that may reasonably be expected to result in downgrading of the rating. (Chapter III; 17-(c))
    4. PACRA engages with the issuer and the debt securities trustee to remain updated on all information pertaining to the rating of the entity/instrument. (Chapter III; 17-(d))
  6. Probability of Default
    1. PACRA’s Rating Scale reflects the expectation of credit risk. The highest rating has the lowest relative likelihood of default (i.e., probability). PACRA’s transition studies capture the historical performance behavior of a specific rating notch. Transition behavior of the assigned rating can be obtained from PACRA’s Transition Study available at our website. (www.pacra.com) However, the actual transition of rating may not follow the pattern observed in the past. (Chapter III; 14-3(f)(vii))
  7. Proprietary Information
    1. All information contained herein is considered proprietary by PACRA. Hence, none of the information in this document can be copied or otherwise reproduced, stored, or disseminated in whole or in part in any form or by any means whatsoever by any person without PACRA’s prior written consent.

Sep-26

www.pacra.com