Rating History
Dissemination Date Long-Term Rating Short-Term Rating Outlook Action Rating Watch
18-Feb-26 AA- A1 Positive Maintain -
14-Mar-25 AA- A1 Stable Maintain -
15-Mar-24 AA- A1 Stable Maintain -
17-Mar-23 AA- A1 Stable Maintain -
18-Mar-22 AA- A1 Stable Maintain -
About the Entity

Descon Engineering Limited was established as a private limited company in Pakistan on December 15, 1977, and transitioned to an unquoted public company on November 29, 1997. The majority of the Company's shares, 99.9%, are held by DEL Projects (Private) Limited. Founded by Mr. Abdul Razzak Dawood, a visionary entrepreneur and former CEO of Descon, the Company was built with a strong commitment to creating a lasting institute in the engineering sector. Mr. Dawood's successors, Mr. Taimur Dawood and Mr. Faisal Dawood, continue to uphold this vision, serving on the Company's board as Chairman and Vice Chairman, respectively. The leadership team at Descon is comprised of highly skilled professionals with decades of industry experience. The CEO, Mr. Taimur Saeed, brings over 30 years of expertise to the Company, driving its strategic direction and growth.

Rating Rationale

Descon Engineering Limited (“Descon” or “the Company”) is a leading engineering and construction company in Pakistan, operating across the Oil & Gas, Power, Hydropower, Cement, and Renewable Energy sectors. The Company specializes in Engineering, Procurement, and Construction (EPC) services and is part of the Descon Group of Companies (“the Group”), which brings over four decades of execution experience. In addition to its domestic operations, the Group has established a growing international footprint across the Middle East, South Africa, and the recently added Azerbaijan market, offering the same bouquet of services as in Pakistan. These overseas operations, together with management’s strategic shift toward higher-margin foreign projects and reallocation of resources accordingly, have become a key driver of consolidated revenues and foreign currency–linked cashflows, strengthening earnings resilience, reducing concentration risk, and providing an incremental cushion to overall performance.; and is reflected in the assigned “Positive Outlook”. Domestically the Company’s sizeable engineering backlog underpins multi-year earnings visibility and supports cashflow predictability, while contractual escalation clauses across core projects provide protection against inflation and currency depreciation, supporting margin stability. As of FY25, execution progress on major projects remains satisfactory, including the Mohmand Dam, which continues to translate into certified billings and collections; given its material contribution to overall volumes and working capital requirements, it remains a key monitoring factor. While the domestic order book has moderated, it remains substantial. Financial risk indicators remain adequate, with a significant portion of non-funded obligations representing an inherent requirement and central aspect of EPC operations. Funded lines remain moderate, reflecting moderate leverage, a strengthened equity base, and manageable debt levels. The inherently working capital–intensive nature of the business continues to constrain the risk profile; however, this is partially mitigated by strategic liquid reserves maintained at the Group level. The Group’s centralized resource planning and deployment framework further enables optimal allocation of capital, technical expertise, and operational capacity across geographies, enhancing execution efficiency and reinforcing its competitive advantage.

Key Rating Drivers

The Company benefits from strong sponsor ownership and continued group support, providing operational stability and financial flexibility. A sizable overseas order book, primarily denominated in foreign currency, reduces reliance on domestic cashflows, while milestone-based billings and timely collections—support adequate liquidity. Going forward, timely execution of ongoing projects, coupled with the buildup of the domestic order book and continued support from foreign operations, will remain important to sustaining operational performance and strengthening the overall profile of the Company.

Profile
Legal Structure

Descon Engineering Limited (“DEL” or the “Company”) is an unquoted public limited company, incorporated in 1977 . The Company operates under the regulatory framework applicable to public companies in Pakistan and prepares its financial statements in accordance with IFRS as adopted in Pakistan. DEL’s legal structure supports participation in large-scale public and private sector contracts, particularly those requiring prequalification, bonding capacity, and long-term execution capability, which is evident from its ongoing portfolio and exposure to government-linked awarding entities.


Background

Over several decades, DEL has established itself as a major engineering and construction contractor with experience spanning infrastructure, energy, industrial, and process-related projects. The Company’s operational footprint includes both domestic and international markets, enabling diversification across geographies and client profiles. This long operating history has allowed DEL to develop institutional knowledge, technical depth, and execution systems suited for complex, multi-year projects, which is reflected in its ability to sustain a large backlog while continuing to secure new awards.


Operations

DEL operates as an integrated engineering solutions provider, offering services across the full project lifecycle, including engineering design, procurement, manufacturing, construction, commissioning, and maintenance. The Company’s operations are supported by established manufacturing facilities and site infrastructure, allowing internal control over critical components of project delivery. This vertically integrated operating model enhances execution reliability but also increases exposure to cost control, working capital intensity, and timely client certifications, all of which directly influence profitability and cash flow generation.


Ownership
Ownership Structure

DEL is a family-owned company, with ownership vested in the Dawood family. The sponsors maintain active involvement in strategic oversight and governance, ensuring alignment between ownership objectives and long-term business strategy. The concentrated ownership structure facilitates decision-making efficiency and strategic continuity, particularly important in a capital-intensive and contract-driven business such as engineering and construction.


Stability

Descon Group operates a diversified and resilient engineering platform with over four decades of execution experience across nine geographies, serving sovereign, multinational, and industrial clients. The broad geographic and client base reduces concentration risk and mitigates exposure to localized economic cycles. Beyond EPC operations, the Group maintains complementary investments in chemicals, agriculture, and hospitality, providing recurring cash flows and earnings diversification. This scale, sectoral spread, and operating depth support sustainable business continuity and strengthen the overall stability of the Group’s risk profile.


Business Acumen

The sponsors possess extensive experience across engineering, industrial operations, and large-scale project execution. This business acumen is reflected in DEL’s sustained ability to prequalify for complex projects, manage diversified execution risks, and maintain relationships with public sector entities, multinational clients, and development agencies. Sponsor expertise continues to underpin strategic positioning and risk management across cycles.


Financial Strength

The Group provides tangible financial depth to Descon Engineering Limited through its scaled engineering platform. DEL Domestic recorded 56% year-on-year revenue growth to PKR 139 billion, while the overseas segment maintains a strong capital base with net equity of PKR 36 billion. Combined operations posted 45% revenue growth with continued backlog expansion. Foreign operations exhibit sound liquidity and debt servicing capacity, evidenced by a current ratio of 1.55x and interest coverage of 7.91x. These factors provide measurable balance sheet support and enhance consolidated financial resilience


Governance
Board Structure

The Board composition reflects a balanced governance structure, comprising executive, non-executive, and independent directors, including female representation. This diversity in oversight strengthens transparency, enhances independent judgment, and supports adherence to established corporate governance best practices.


Members’ Profile

Board members collectively bring experience in engineering, finance, corporate management, and strategy. This mix of technical and financial expertise enables informed oversight of project execution risks, capital allocation decisions, and financial performance, which are critical given the scale and complexity of DEL’s operations.


Board Effectiveness

The Board provides structured oversight across operational, financial, and strategic matters, supporting disciplined governance and accountability. The Company’s governance framework is aligned with internationally recognized practices, and periodic independent third-party assessments have reviewed its sustainability and governance systems, with overall outcomes considered satisfactory. This external validation reflects continued strengthening of governance processes and supports institutional confidence in the Company’s oversight environment.


Financial Transparency

Crowe Hussain Chaudhury & Co., Chartered Accountants, act as the external auditors and have issued an unqualified opinion on the Company’s financial statements, reflecting adherence to applicable accounting and reporting standards. In parallel, the internal audit function is outsourced to KPMG Taseer Hadi & Co., Chartered Accountants, which conducts independent, risk-based reviews of internal controls, operational processes, and governance practices. This layered assurance framework strengthens oversight, enhances control reliability, and supports the integrity of financial reporting.


Management
Organizational Structure

DEL operates under a clearly defined organizational structure with functional segregation across finance, strategy, information systems, internal audit, human resources, legal, and corporate affairs. This structure supports operational control, financial discipline, and compliance across geographically dispersed projects and business units.


Management Team

The Company is led by an experienced senior management team with long tenures within the organization and deep familiarity with DEL’s operating model. Management experience spans project execution, manufacturing, marketing, and corporate leadership, enabling continuity in execution and strategic focus.


Effectiveness

Management has demonstrated the ability to execute large-scale, technically complex projects while maintaining operational continuity. The sustained growth in revenues and the ability to manage a sizeable backlog indicate effective execution capability, although margin performance and cash flow volatility highlight ongoing challenges inherent in the sector.


MIS

The Group has initiated the implementation of SAP S/4HANA across both local and overseas engineering operations, marking a transition toward a more integrated and digitally enabled operating platform. The upgraded system is expected to enhance data integrity, provide real-time visibility across projects, automate processes, and strengthen internal control effectiveness. This evolution of the MIS framework supports improved governance, cost monitoring, and informed decision-making across geographically dispersed operations. 


Control Environment

The Company operates under established Quality, Health, Safety, and Environment (QHSE) frameworks and holds internationally recognized certifications, including ISO 9001, ISO 14001, and OHSAS 18001. These systems support compliance with regulatory requirements and mitigate operational and safety risks inherent in engineering and construction activities.


Business Risk
Industry Dynamics

The engineering and construction sector remains closely linked to public sector development spending, infrastructure initiatives, and energy-related investments. Demand conditions are supported by ongoing government-led projects; however, sector dynamics remain sensitive to fiscal constraints, funding availability, and execution delays, which can affect project timelines and cash flows.


Relative Position

DEL is among a limited group of contractors registered in the PEC CA category, allowing participation in large and complex projects. This positioning provides a competitive advantage in bidding for high-value contracts and supports sustained backlog generation, as reflected in the Company’s ongoing project portfolio.


Revenues

During FY25, DEL reported revenue of PKR 42.8 billion, reflecting a year-on-year increase driven by execution of existing projects and partial recognition from newly awarded contracts. As on 31-Dec-2025, the Company’s total project portfolio stood at PKR 188.9 billion, with remaining revenue to be booked at PKR 88.0 billion. Revenue recognized during Jul–Dec 2025 amounted to PKR 18.1 billion, providing visibility into near-term earnings while underscoring dependence on timely execution and client certifications.


Margins

Gross margins remained moderate at 10.5%, consistent with the competitive and fixed-price nature of large-scale EPC contracts, while net profit margin stood at 2.0%. Despite structurally lean sector margins, the Company benefits from a robust enterprise risk management framework that actively monitors project-level execution risks and mitigates potential cost overruns or delays. Furthermore, contractual protections through escalation clauses, variation orders, and claims mechanisms provide a natural hedge against macroeconomic volatility and input cost fluctuations, supporting margin stability and earnings resilience.


Sustainability

The sizeable backlog and diversified project mix provide medium-term revenue visibility. However, sustainability of earnings remains linked to execution efficiency, working capital management, and the ability to protect margins amid inflationary pressures and competitive bidding. Continued order replenishment and disciplined project management are critical to sustaining performance.


Financial Risk
Working capital

DEL’s operations are inherently working-capital intensive, driven by high receivables and inventory requirements. As at Jun-25, trade receivables stood at PKR 13.3 billion, contributing to elevated gross working capital days of 91 days and net working capital days of 57 days. The current ratio of 1.0x indicates tight liquidity, with reliance on short-term borrowings and internal cash flows to fund operational needs.


Coverages

Cash flow coverage metrics weakened during FY25, with FCFO of PKR 4.8 billion and FCFO-to-finance cost of 0.7x, reflecting pressure from working capital movements. EBITDA-to-finance costs remained adequate at 4.4x, while debt payback stood at 1.7 years.


Capitalization

DEL’s capital structure remains moderate and primarily working capital driven, with total borrowings representing 34.4% of capitalization as at Jun-25. Shareholders’ equity stood at PKR 18.3 billion against total assets of PKR 58.0 billion, providing a comfortable equity cushion. The debt profile is largely short-term in nature, with no material long-term obligations or restrictive covenants, thereby preserving financial flexibility and limiting structural refinancing risk. Borrowings are principally utilized to bridge project-related working capital cycles typical of EPC operations. While average borrowing rates reflect the prevailing interest rate environment, the effective financing cost remains manageable at approximately 3% of revenue, indicating contained debt servicing burden.


 
 

Feb-26

www.pacra.com


(PKR mln)


Jun-25
12M
Jun-24
12M
Jun-23
12M
A. BALANCE SHEET
1. Non-Current Assets 23,096 24,133 19,367
2. Investments 3,265 3,780 1,391
3. Related Party Exposure 2,391 2,084 3,322
4. Current Assets 29,241 24,635 20,963
a. Inventories 2,060 1,645 1,793
b. Trade Receivables 13,314 4,277 4,889
5. Total Assets 57,994 54,631 45,043
6. Current Liabilities 28,516 25,712 20,515
a. Trade Payables 4,537 3,429 4,143
7. Borrowings 9,587 8,422 6,056
8. Related Party Exposure 710 342 360
9. Non-Current Liabilities 926 2,571 3,611
10. Net Assets 18,254 17,583 14,501
11. Shareholders' Equity 18,254 17,583 14,501
B. INCOME STATEMENT
1. Sales 42,775 35,222 27,690
a. Cost of Good Sold (38,268) (31,208) (25,332)
2. Gross Profit 4,506 4,014 2,358
a. Operating Expenses (1,845) (1,469) (1,590)
3. Operating Profit 2,662 2,545 768
a. Non Operating Income or (Expense) 1,206 1,151 1,580
4. Profit or (Loss) before Interest and Tax 3,868 3,696 2,348
a. Total Finance Cost (1,633) (1,750) (1,527)
b. Taxation (1,362) (1,000) (875)
6. Net Income Or (Loss) 873 946 (55)
C. CASH FLOW STATEMENT
a. Free Cash Flows from Operations (FCFO) 4,762 4,372 2,639
b. Net Cash from Operating Activities before Working Capital Changes 3,273 2,879 1,400
c. Changes in Working Capital (6,771) 279 (1,517)
1. Net Cash provided by Operating Activities (3,498) 3,158 (117)
2. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Investing Activities (42) (3,084) 485
3. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Financing Activities 736 1,899 (616)
4. Net Cash generated or (Used) during the period (2,804) 1,973 (248)
D. RATIO ANALYSIS
1. Performance
a. Sales Growth (for the period) 21.4% 27.2% 42.3%
b. Gross Profit Margin 10.5% 11.4% 8.5%
c. Net Profit Margin 2.0% 2.7% -0.2%
d. Cash Conversion Efficiency (FCFO adjusted for Working Capital/Sales) -4.7% 13.2% 4.1%
e. Return on Equity [ Net Profit Margin * Asset Turnover * (Total Assets/Shareholders' Equity )] 4.9% 5.9% -0.4%
2. Working Capital Management
a. Gross Working Capital (Average Days) 91 65 81
b. Net Working Capital (Average Days) 57 26 30
c. Current Ratio (Current Assets / Current Liabilities) 1.0 1.0 1.0
3. Coverages
a. EBITDA / Finance Cost 4.4 3.4 2.5
b. FCFO / Finance Cost+CMLTB+Excess STB 0.7 0.7 0.6
c. Debt Payback (Total Borrowings+Excess STB) / (FCFO-Finance Cost) 1.7 2.1 3.3
4. Capital Structure
a. Total Borrowings / (Total Borrowings+Shareholders' Equity) 34.4% 32.4% 29.5%
b. Interest or Markup Payable (Days) 61.6 75.8 91.6
c. Entity Average Borrowing Rate 14.2% 20.8% 20.8%

Feb-26

www.pacra.com

Feb-26

www.pacra.com

  1. Rating Team Statements
    1. Rating is just an opinion about the creditworthiness of the entity and does not constitute a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell any security of the entity rated or to buy, hold, or sell the security rated, as the case may be. (Chapter III; 14-3-(x))
    2. Conflict of Interest
      1. The Rating Team or any of their family members have no interest in this rating (Chapter III; 12-2-(j))
      2. PACRA, the analysts involved in the rating process, and members of its rating committee and their family members do not have any conflict of interest relating to the rating done by them (Chapter III; 12-2-(e) & (k))
      3. The analyst is not a substantial shareholder of the customer being rated by PACRA [Annexure F; d-(ii)]
      4. Explanation: for the purpose of the above clause, the term "family members" shall include only those family members who are dependent on the analyst and members of the rating committee.
  2. Restrictions
    1. No director, officer, or employee of PACRA communicates the information acquired by him for use for rating purposes to any other person, except where required under law to do so. (Chapter III; 10-(5))
    2. PACRA does not disclose or discuss with outside parties or make improper use of the non-public information which has come to its knowledge during a business relationship with the customer. (Chapter III; 10-7-(d))
    3. PACRA does not make proposals or recommendations regarding the activities of rated entities that could impact a credit rating of the entity subject to rating. (Chapter III; 10-7-(k))
  3. Conduct of Business
    1. PACRA fulfills its obligations in a fair, efficient, transparent, and ethical manner and renders high standards of services in performing its functions and obligations. (Chapter III; 11-A-(a))
    2. PACRA uses due care in the preparation of this Rating Report. Our information has been obtained from sources we consider to be reliable, but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. PACRA does not, in every instance, independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing this Rating Report. (Clause 11-(A)(p))
    3. PACRA prohibits its employees and analysts from soliciting money, gifts, or favors from anyone with whom PACRA conducts business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(q))
    4. PACRA ensures before the commencement of the rating process that an analyst or employee has not had a recent employment or other significant business or personal relationship with the rated entity that may cause or may be perceived as causing a conflict of interest. (Chapter III; 11-A-(r))
    5. PACRA maintains the principle of integrity in seeking rating business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(u))
    6. PACRA promptly investigates in the event of misconduct or a breach of the policies, procedures, and controls, and takes appropriate steps to rectify any weaknesses to prevent any recurrence, along with suitable punitive action against the responsible employee(s). (Chapter III; 11-B-(m))
  4. Independence & Conflict of Interest
    1. PACRA receives compensation from the entity being rated or any third party for the rating services it offers. The receipt of this compensation has no influence on PACRA’s opinions or other analytical processes. In all instances, PACRA is committed to preserving the objectivity, integrity, and independence of its ratings. Our relationship is governed by two distinct mandates: i) rating mandate - signed with the entity being rated or issuer of the debt instrument, and ii) fee mandate - signed with the payer, which can be different from the entity.
    2. PACRA does not provide consultancy/advisory services or other services to any of its customers or their associated companies and associated undertakings that are being rated or have been rated by it during the preceding three years, unless it has an adequate mechanism in place ensuring that the provision of such services does not lead to a conflict of interest situation with its rating activities. (Chapter III; 12-2-(d))
    3. PACRA discloses that no shareholder directly or indirectly holding 10% or more of the share capital of PACRA also holds directly or indirectly 10% or more of the share capital of the entity which is subject to rating or the entity which issued the instrument subject to rating by PACRA. (Chapter III; 12-2-(f))
    4. PACRA ensures that the rating assigned to an entity or instrument is not affected by the existence of a business relationship between PACRA and the entity or any other party, or the non-existence of such a relationship. (Chapter III; 12-2-(i))
    5. PACRA ensures that the analysts or any of their family members shall not buy, sell, or engage in any transaction in any security which falls in the analyst’s area of primary analytical responsibility. This clause, however, does not apply to investments in securities through collective investment schemes. (Chapter III; 12-2-(l))
    6. PACRA has established policies and procedures governing investments and trading in securities by its employees and for monitoring the same to prevent insider trading, market manipulation, or any other market abuse. (Chapter III; 11-B-(g))
  5. Monitoring and Review
    1. PACRA monitors all the outstanding ratings continuously, and any potential change therein due to any event associated with the issuer, the security arrangement, the industry, etc., is disseminated to the market immediately and in an effective manner after appropriate consultation with the entity/issuer. (Chapter III; 17-(a))
    2. PACRA reviews all the outstanding ratings periodically on an annual basis. Provided that public dissemination of annual review and in an instance of change in rating will be made. (Chapter III; 17-(b))
    3. PACRA initiates an immediate review of the outstanding rating upon becoming aware of any information that may reasonably be expected to result in downgrading of the rating. (Chapter III; 17-(c))
    4. PACRA engages with the issuer and the debt securities trustee to remain updated on all information pertaining to the rating of the entity/instrument. (Chapter III; 17-(d))
  6. Probability of Default
    1. PACRA’s Rating Scale reflects the expectation of credit risk. The highest rating has the lowest relative likelihood of default (i.e., probability). PACRA’s transition studies capture the historical performance behavior of a specific rating notch. Transition behavior of the assigned rating can be obtained from PACRA’s Transition Study available at our website. (www.pacra.com) However, the actual transition of rating may not follow the pattern observed in the past. (Chapter III; 14-3(f)(vii))
  7. Proprietary Information
    1. All information contained herein is considered proprietary by PACRA. Hence, none of the information in this document can be copied or otherwise reproduced, stored, or disseminated in whole or in part in any form or by any means whatsoever by any person without PACRA’s prior written consent.

Feb-26

www.pacra.com