Rating History
Dissemination Date Long-Term Rating Short-Term Rating Outlook Action Rating Watch
19-Dec-25 A- A2 Stable Maintain -
20-Dec-24 A- A2 Stable Initial -
About the Entity

Advance Telecom (Pvt.) Limited (‘ATPL’ or ‘the Company’) was incorporated on March 2, 2016 in Karachi, though the Advance Telecom group has been operating since 1996. The Company commenced commercial operations in November 2020 and is primarily engaged in the nationwide distribution of mobile phones, smart devices, accessories, and related products. ATPL holds distribution agreements for Tecno, Itel, and Nokia. In FY25, the Company expanded its portfolio by entering the solar products segment, adding the trading of solar panels, inverters, and batteries to diversify its revenue base.

Rating Rationale

Advance Telecom (Pvt.) Limited (“ATPL” or “the Company”) retains its position as one of Pakistan’s foremost distributors of mobile handsets, accessories and consumer technology products. The Company’s long standing partnerships with principal brands including Tecno, Itel and Nokia continue to anchor its industry presence by ensuring consistent model availability and reinforcing its commercial franchise in a market characterized by thin spreads, intense price competition and rapid inventory turnover. ATPL’s operational alignment with Enercom Technologies (Pvt.) Ltd., a local assembler, further enhances supply consistency and responsiveness to product diversification. The nationwide distribution footprint remains extensive, covering key urban and semi urban geographies and serving both retail and institutional clientele. The mobile handset sector in FY25 entered a more normalized phase after an exceptionally high FY24. Industry volumes last year were artificially elevated as distributors accelerated handset imports ahead of the implementation of sales tax on mobile devices, resulting in significant pre July stocking and an abnormally high benchmark. With the dissipation of this one off effect, demand reverted to typical replacement driven levels, further challenged by soft consumer purchasing power and a slowdown in wholesale institutional buying. Within this environment, the structural reality of the sector became even more pronounced, where extremely low spreads and tight operating margins limit earnings visibility and restrict organic growth potential for distributors. This margin compressed backdrop has been a significant catalyst for ATPL’s strategic decision to enter the energy value chain by expanding into solar panels, inverters and batteries. The move reflects a deliberate shift toward a segment that offers comparatively better pricing flexibility, higher value retention and a more favorable margin profile relative to handset distribution. ATPL reported revenues of PKR 37 billion in FY25 compared to PKR 51 billion in FY24, reflecting a 27 percent decline from the inflated base. Profitability metrics moderated accordingly, with gross margin at 4.2 percent compared to 4.6 percent, operating margin at 2.8 percent compared to 3.9 percent and PBIT margin at 2.6 percent compared to 3.7 percent. Net margin remained steady at 0.7 percent owing to prudent cost management and operational discipline. Returns softened, with ROA at 3.1 percent and ROE at 13.5 percent. Working capital pressures intensified due to higher inventory levels and elongated receivable cycles, extending the cash conversion cycle. Short term borrowings stood at PKR 4.5 billion compared to PKR 5 billion in FY24, while equity improved marginally to PKR 1.9 billion. Off balance sheet exposures remain sizeable and require continuous oversight. The governance structure continues to be family led with centralized decision making. While management demonstrates strong sectoral insight and execution capability, the absence of independent oversight and an internal audit function constrains governance depth. Sponsor support remains an important credit strength, evidenced historically during periods of operational strain.

Key Rating Drivers

The ratings remain dependent on ATPL’s ability to sustain its market position, restore margin resilience in a low spread operating environment, strengthen governance practices and generate improved liquidity to support its leveraged balance sheet while advancing its diversification into the energy value chain.

Profile
Legal Structure

Advance Telecom (Private) Limited (‘ATPL’ or ‘the Company’) is a private limited company, incorporated on March 2, 2016 under the repealed Companies Ordinance, 1984 (now the Companies Act, 2017). The Company commenced commercial operations in November 2020. Its registered office is located at Amma Tower, M.A. Jinnah Road, Karachi, with additional warehouse facilities in Lahore & Hyderabad.


Background

ATPL, incorporated in 2016, is a prominent mobile phone distributor in Pakistan with a strong nationwide presence. The Company has expanded its footprint through a joint venture with Enercom Technologies (Pvt.) Ltd., a local mobile phone manufacturer, where common directorship exists through Mr. Rizwan, who also holds a 50% equity stake in Enercom. Enercom specializes in producing high-quality smartphones and feature phones, with a daily production capacity exceeding 10,000 devices, and more than 200,000 feature phones and 100,000 smartphones per month. ATPL’s distribution journey began with Nokia. Currently, it holds official distribution agreements for Tecno, Itel, and Nokia.


Operations

The Company operates primarily as a distributor under agreements with its principals, dealing in mobile handsets, allied accessories, and after-sales services. Mobile devices are procured from various suppliers, most notably Enercom Technologies (Pvt.) Ltd, its major supplier.  ATPL sells its products through an extensive dealer network to individual retail customers as well as to corporate clients. The Company is an authorized distributor of Tecno, Itel, and Nokia. In line with its diversification strategy, the Company has expanded its portfolio in FY25 by entering the energy products segment, engaging in the import and trading of solar panels, batteries, and inverters. This new segment operates purely on a trading basis, with products imported and sold through the Company’s established distribution channels.


Ownership
Ownership Structure

The ownership structure of ATPL reflects a closely held, family-driven governance model. The Company is jointly owned by Mr. Muhammad Rizwan and Mr. Muhammad Asif, each holding a 50% share. Their father, Mr. Abdul Majid, serves as the Chairman of the Board.


Stability

The ownership structure of the Company is seen as stable as the stake of the Company is held by the members of the family, and no significant changes are expected in the ownership structure of the Company in the foreseeable future.


Business Acumen

Mr. Abdul Majid, the founding figure, provides strategic guidance based on decades of industry experience, laying the foundation for ATPL’s growth and partnerships. His son, Mr. Rizwan, manages daily operations and drives strategic initiatives, including diversification into the solar trading segment, reflecting strong combined business acumen.


Financial Strength

The sponsoring family has demonstrated strong financial backing, contributing to the Company whenever required, particularly during critical periods to support operations and growth.


Governance
Board Structure

The Company’s governance framework is currently limited, with oversight vested in a two-member Board of Directors, consisting solely of the owners: Mr. Muhammad Rizwan and Mr. Muhammad Asif. Mr. Rizwan serves as the Chief Executive Officer (CEO), while Mr. Asif holds the role of President. However, the absence of non-executive and independent directors’ results in a concentrated decision-making structure and limits the Board’s ability to provide objective oversight. Strengthening the Board through the inclusion of independent members would significantly enhance governance quality, improve internal controls, and align the Company with best corporate governance practices.


Members’ Profile

The Company’s executive leadership is spearheaded by Mr. Muhammad Rizwan, Chief Executive Officer (CEO), and Mr. Muhammad Asif, President. Both individuals bring over 30 years of extensive and relevant industry experience, contributing significantly to the Company’s operational direction and market understanding. In addition to their roles at ATPL, they also maintain business interests in other related and successful ventures.


Board Effectiveness

The effectiveness of the Board remains constrained due to its limited size and committee structure. ATPL currently operates with only one Board-level committee, the Human Resource & Remuneration Committee. The absence of other essential committees restricts the Board’s ability to exercise comprehensive oversight across key governance areas. Establishing additional independent committees would substantially enhance governance effectiveness, strengthen oversight, and align the Company with best practices in corporate governance.


Financial Transparency

The Company’s external audit is conducted by M/s Reanda Haroon Zakaria & Company, an audit firm categorized under ‘B’ rating in the SBP Panel of Auditors. The absence of an internal audit function represents a notable gap in the Company’s financial oversight framework.


Management
Organizational Structure

The Company’s organizational structure is functionally segmented, with all department heads reporting directly to the Chief Executive Officer (CEO), ensuring centralized oversight and streamlined decision-making. The main departments of ATPL include HR & Administration, Sales, Finance, Business Control, Marketing, and Logistics. Each department has a well-defined hierarchical structure with multiple management cadres, enabling clear delegation of responsibilities, efficient workflow, and smooth day-to-day operations.


Management Team

ATPL’s management team comprises experienced professionals with long-standing tenure, ensuring continuity and operational stability. Abdul Rehman serves as Company Secretary, Muhammad Anas heads the Finance department, Amir Hameed leads Sales as Country Head, and Muhammad Salman manages Logistics. All report directly to the CEO and have been with the Company since its incorporation, bringing over 30 years of cumulative industry experience. This continuity in leadership across key functions enhances strategic execution, departmental coordination, and day-to-day operational efficiency.


Effectiveness

The Company’s management effectiveness is supported by its principal operational body, the Executive Committee, which oversees the execution of business strategies and monitors operational performance across departments.


MIS

ATPL has implemented an Oracle-based management information system (MIS), acquired in 2010, which generates detailed and frequent reports for senior management. The MIS is closely aligned with business operations, supporting effective and timely decision-making across departments.


Control Environment

The absence of an internal audit function represents a gap in the internal control framework, limiting continuous monitoring and independent assessment of operational and financial processes. Establishing an internal audit department in the future would further strengthen ATPL’s control environment and risk management capabilities.


Business Risk
Industry Dynamics

The Pakistani mobile‑handset industry in 2025 is witnessing a shifting dynamic: local manufacturing and assembly have become dominant, with domestic plants meeting the bulk of demand while imports shrink in relative share. In the first nine months of 2025 alone, local facilities assembled around 22.78 million handsets, including both smartphones and 2G/feature phones. This surge reflects broader industry trends, demand is increasingly price‑sensitive, and consumers favor affordable locally‑assembled phones. According to recent data, roughly 94–95% of demand in 2025 was fulfilled through local assembly, reversing earlier years when imports played a larger role. However, the sector is also experiencing headwinds. Market wide handset sales in FY 2024–25 dropped by about 12% year on year, with overall volume falling from 34 million to just over 30 million units. Longer replacement cycles (from ~2.5 years to ~3.5 years), limited new product launches, and weakening consumer purchasing power especially in rural areas have contributed to the slowdown. At the same time, smartphone adoption continues to grow: many local assemblers report a rising share of smartphones relative to feature phones, in line with increasing internet penetration and demand for affordable smart devices. In this environment, distributors like ATPL operate in a competitive but evolving industry: success depends on aligning with local‑assembly supply chains, managing cost pressures, responding to shifting consumer demand (between 2G/feature phones and smartphones), and adapting to potentially slower replacement cycles.


Relative Position

ATPL holds an estimated 70% market share of Itel phones, 30% of Tecno phones & 50% of Nokia phones in Pakistan, reflecting a good presence in the mobile distribution sector. The Company is also an emerging player in the solar products market, though its footprint in this segment is still limited compared with established solar distributors.


Revenues

The Company reported revenues of PKR 37 million in FY25, compared with PKR 51 million in FY24, reflecting a 27% year-on-year decline. This decrease was primarily driven by a combination of higher tax imposition on mobile imports, regulatory restrictions, and the absence of bulk sales, which had significantly boosted revenues in FY24, making it an abnormally strong year. While FY24 benefitted from one-off large transactions and favorable import conditions, FY25 reflects a more normalized revenue base, impacted by market-wide cost pressures and import limitations.


Margins

ATPL’s COGS declined from PKR 49 million in FY24 to PKR 36 million in FY25, broadly in line with the decrease in revenues (from PKR 51 million to PKR 37 million). Margins reflected this normalization, with Gross Profit Margin at 4.2% (4.6% in FY24), Operating Profit Margin at 2.8% (3.9%), and PBIT Margin at 2.6% (3.7%). Net Profit Margin remained stable at 0.7%, while the effective tax rate eased to 25.2% from 41.4%. Some moderation in returns was observed, with ROA at 3.1%, ROE at 13.5%, and asset turnover at 460.8%, mainly due to lower revenue levels and asset utilization. Cash conversion efficiency stood at 1.4%, rising to 3.7% when adjusted for working capital movements. Overall, FY25 reflects the impact of industry normalization and shifts in regulatory and market dynamics, suggesting room for continued focus on cost management and operational efficiency.


Sustainability

To enhance product diversity and strengthen long-term business resilience, ATPL ventured into the solar panels market in FY25. This strategic move reflects the Company’s commitment to sustainable and renewable energy solutions, supporting both revenue diversification and alignment with broader environmental trends in Pakistan.


Financial Risk
Working capital

ATPL’s working capital cycle saw some lengthening in FY25, with inventory days at 28 (vs. 12 in FY24) and receivable days at 26 (vs. 15). Payable days increased to 11 from 3 in FY24. As a result, net working capital days increased to 43 compared to 25 previously, while the current ratio remained comfortable at 2.9. The extended cycle highlights an opportunity for enhanced management of inventory and receivables to support stronger liquidity flow.


Coverages

ATPL’s coverage indicators in FY25 show a moderate capacity to meet financial obligations. EBITDA-to-finance cost improved slightly to 1.6x from 1.5x in FY24, reflecting steady operating performance. Cash flow from operations (FCFO) declined by 71.6%, following an exceptional increase in the prior year, leading to FCFO-to-finance cost coverage of 0.8x (vs. 1.4x). When assessed against total short-term borrowings and liabilities, coverage stood at 0.5x, while liquid coverage remained adequate at 1.6x. Overall, the year’s cash flow trends highlight the importance of maintaining strong operational cash generation to support coverage metrics.


Capitalization

ATPL’s capital structure continues to show a high reliance on short-term borrowings, which formed 69.7% of total capital in FY25, slightly lower than 73.7% last year. Equity improved modestly to PKR 1.9 billion from PKR 1.8 billion, providing some additional support to the balance sheet. Off-balance sheet exposures increased during the year, reflecting higher operational commitments. While the Company remains dependent on short-term facilities, maintaining prudent liquidity management will be important going forward.


 
 

Dec-25

www.pacra.com


Jun-25
12M
Jun-24
12M
Jun-23
12M
A. BALANCE SHEET
1. Non-Current Assets 326 224 124
2. Investments 0 0 0
3. Related Party Exposure 1,985 0 0
4. Current Assets 6,372 7,484 3,248
a. Inventories 4,097 1,756 125
b. Trade Receivables 1,434 4,039 163
5. Total Assets 8,684 7,708 3,373
6. Current Liabilities 2,186 835 55
a. Trade Payables 2,006 362 0
7. Borrowings 4,508 5,048 1,843
8. Related Party Exposure 0 0 0
9. Non-Current Liabilities 30 21 13
10. Net Assets 1,960 1,805 1,463
11. Shareholders' Equity 1,960 1,805 1,463
B. INCOME STATEMENT
1. Sales 37,767 51,825 12,914
a. Cost of Good Sold (36,167) (49,459) (12,392)
2. Gross Profit 1,600 2,366 523
a. Operating Expenses (555) (342) (223)
3. Operating Profit 1,045 2,023 299
a. Non Operating Income or (Expense) (48) (107) (25)
4. Profit or (Loss) before Interest and Tax 996 1,916 274
a. Total Finance Cost (656) (1,335) (176)
b. Taxation (86) (241) (31)
6. Net Income Or (Loss) 255 341 67
C. CASH FLOW STATEMENT
a. Free Cash Flows from Operations (FCFO) 522 1,838 238
b. Net Cash from Operating Activities before Working Capital Changes (326) 716 52
c. Changes in Working Capital 872 (3,732) 647
1. Net Cash provided by Operating Activities 546 (3,016) 699
2. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Investing Activities (99) (73) (83)
3. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Financing Activities (640) 3,205 (534)
4. Net Cash generated or (Used) during the period (193) 116 82
D. RATIO ANALYSIS
1. Performance
a. Sales Growth (for the period) -27.1% 301.3% -46.9%
b. Gross Profit Margin 4.2% 4.6% 4.0%
c. Net Profit Margin 0.7% 0.7% 0.5%
d. Cash Conversion Efficiency (FCFO adjusted for Working Capital/Sales) 3.7% -3.7% 6.9%
e. Return on Equity [ Net Profit Margin * Asset Turnover * (Total Assets/Shareholders' Equity )] 13.5% 20.8% 4.7%
2. Working Capital Management
a. Gross Working Capital (Average Days) 55 27 41
b. Net Working Capital (Average Days) 43 25 41
c. Current Ratio (Current Assets / Current Liabilities) 2.9 9.0 59.6
3. Coverages
a. EBITDA / Finance Cost 1.6 1.5 1.7
b. FCFO / Finance Cost+CMLTB+Excess STB 0.5 1.4 1.4
c. Debt Payback (Total Borrowings+Excess STB) / (FCFO-Finance Cost) -2.5 0.0 0.0
4. Capital Structure
a. Total Borrowings / (Total Borrowings+Shareholders' Equity) 69.7% 73.7% 55.8%
b. Interest or Markup Payable (Days) 35.9 70.8 89.7
c. Entity Average Borrowing Rate 12.7% 31.1% 8.3%

Dec-25

www.pacra.com

Dec-25

www.pacra.com

  1. Rating Team Statements
    1. Rating is just an opinion about the creditworthiness of the entity and does not constitute a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell any security of the entity rated or to buy, hold, or sell the security rated, as the case may be. (Chapter III; 14-3-(x))
    2. Conflict of Interest
      1. The Rating Team or any of their family members have no interest in this rating (Chapter III; 12-2-(j))
      2. PACRA, the analysts involved in the rating process, and members of its rating committee and their family members do not have any conflict of interest relating to the rating done by them (Chapter III; 12-2-(e) & (k))
      3. The analyst is not a substantial shareholder of the customer being rated by PACRA [Annexure F; d-(ii)]
      4. Explanation: for the purpose of the above clause, the term "family members" shall include only those family members who are dependent on the analyst and members of the rating committee.
  2. Restrictions
    1. No director, officer, or employee of PACRA communicates the information acquired by him for use for rating purposes to any other person, except where required under law to do so. (Chapter III; 10-(5))
    2. PACRA does not disclose or discuss with outside parties or make improper use of the non-public information which has come to its knowledge during a business relationship with the customer. (Chapter III; 10-7-(d))
    3. PACRA does not make proposals or recommendations regarding the activities of rated entities that could impact a credit rating of the entity subject to rating. (Chapter III; 10-7-(k))
  3. Conduct of Business
    1. PACRA fulfills its obligations in a fair, efficient, transparent, and ethical manner and renders high standards of services in performing its functions and obligations. (Chapter III; 11-A-(a))
    2. PACRA uses due care in the preparation of this Rating Report. Our information has been obtained from sources we consider to be reliable, but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. PACRA does not, in every instance, independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing this Rating Report. (Clause 11-(A)(p))
    3. PACRA prohibits its employees and analysts from soliciting money, gifts, or favors from anyone with whom PACRA conducts business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(q))
    4. PACRA ensures before the commencement of the rating process that an analyst or employee has not had a recent employment or other significant business or personal relationship with the rated entity that may cause or may be perceived as causing a conflict of interest. (Chapter III; 11-A-(r))
    5. PACRA maintains the principle of integrity in seeking rating business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(u))
    6. PACRA promptly investigates in the event of misconduct or a breach of the policies, procedures, and controls, and takes appropriate steps to rectify any weaknesses to prevent any recurrence, along with suitable punitive action against the responsible employee(s). (Chapter III; 11-B-(m))
  4. Independence & Conflict of Interest
    1. PACRA receives compensation from the entity being rated or any third party for the rating services it offers. The receipt of this compensation has no influence on PACRA’s opinions or other analytical processes. In all instances, PACRA is committed to preserving the objectivity, integrity, and independence of its ratings. Our relationship is governed by two distinct mandates: i) rating mandate - signed with the entity being rated or issuer of the debt instrument, and ii) fee mandate - signed with the payer, which can be different from the entity.
    2. PACRA does not provide consultancy/advisory services or other services to any of its customers or their associated companies and associated undertakings that are being rated or have been rated by it during the preceding three years, unless it has an adequate mechanism in place ensuring that the provision of such services does not lead to a conflict of interest situation with its rating activities. (Chapter III; 12-2-(d))
    3. PACRA discloses that no shareholder directly or indirectly holding 10% or more of the share capital of PACRA also holds directly or indirectly 10% or more of the share capital of the entity which is subject to rating or the entity which issued the instrument subject to rating by PACRA. (Chapter III; 12-2-(f))
    4. PACRA ensures that the rating assigned to an entity or instrument is not affected by the existence of a business relationship between PACRA and the entity or any other party, or the non-existence of such a relationship. (Chapter III; 12-2-(i))
    5. PACRA ensures that the analysts or any of their family members shall not buy, sell, or engage in any transaction in any security which falls in the analyst’s area of primary analytical responsibility. This clause, however, does not apply to investments in securities through collective investment schemes. (Chapter III; 12-2-(l))
    6. PACRA has established policies and procedures governing investments and trading in securities by its employees and for monitoring the same to prevent insider trading, market manipulation, or any other market abuse. (Chapter III; 11-B-(g))
  5. Monitoring and Review
    1. PACRA monitors all the outstanding ratings continuously, and any potential change therein due to any event associated with the issuer, the security arrangement, the industry, etc., is disseminated to the market immediately and in an effective manner after appropriate consultation with the entity/issuer. (Chapter III; 17-(a))
    2. PACRA reviews all the outstanding ratings periodically on an annual basis. Provided that public dissemination of annual review and in an instance of change in rating will be made. (Chapter III; 17-(b))
    3. PACRA initiates an immediate review of the outstanding rating upon becoming aware of any information that may reasonably be expected to result in downgrading of the rating. (Chapter III; 17-(c))
    4. PACRA engages with the issuer and the debt securities trustee to remain updated on all information pertaining to the rating of the entity/instrument. (Chapter III; 17-(d))
  6. Probability of Default
    1. PACRA’s Rating Scale reflects the expectation of credit risk. The highest rating has the lowest relative likelihood of default (i.e., probability). PACRA’s transition studies capture the historical performance behavior of a specific rating notch. Transition behavior of the assigned rating can be obtained from PACRA’s Transition Study available at our website. (www.pacra.com) However, the actual transition of rating may not follow the pattern observed in the past. (Chapter III; 14-3(f)(vii))
  7. Proprietary Information
    1. All information contained herein is considered proprietary by PACRA. Hence, none of the information in this document can be copied or otherwise reproduced, stored, or disseminated in whole or in part in any form or by any means whatsoever by any person without PACRA’s prior written consent.

Dec-25

www.pacra.com