Rating History
Dissemination Date Long-Term Rating Short-Term Rating Outlook Action Rating Watch
19-Dec-25 BBB+ A2 Stable Maintain -
20-Dec-24 BBB+ A2 Stable Upgrade -
21-Dec-23 BBB A2 Positive Maintain -
22-Dec-22 BBB A2 Stable Maintain -
22-Dec-21 BBB A2 Stable Initial -
About the Entity

EXIDE was incorporated in Pakistan in 1953 as a private limited company in association with Chloride Group PLC of the United Kingdom and was listed on the Karachi Stock Exchange in 1982. EXIDE's majority stake is held by the Hashwani Family (75.54%) while the financial institutions and mutual funds hold ~16.24% and the remaining ~8.22% is held by the general public. Mr. Arif Hashwani is the Chairman of the Board while Mr. Arshad Shahzada is the Managing Director/CEO of the Company.

Rating Rationale

EXIDE Pakistan Limited (“EXIDE” or “the Company”) is a pioneer in the battery industry in Pakistan. Since its inception in 1953, the Company has maintained a strong presence across the automotive, industrial, and household backup segments through a diversified product portfolio and longstanding market reputation. Demand for the local lead-acid battery sector primarily stems from the replacement market, household backup needs arising from electricity shortages, and sales to Automobile Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs). In recent periods, the battery industry has experienced renewed traction, supported by improved automobile offtake as the macroeconomic environment stabilizes. A more stable exchange rate, easing inflation, and a relatively favorable interest rate outlook have contributed to increased vehicle demand, generating broader room for growth in OEM-related battery sales. Concurrently, rising household and industrial energy consumption, along with recurring load-shedding, has reinforced the need for efficient backup power solutions. Persistently high electricity tariffs have also accelerated the shift toward solar power systems, where batteries serve as an essential storage component, significantly expanding the industry’s demand base. Additionally, the sector is witnessing a technological shift as consumers increasingly transition from conventional lead-acid batteries to lithium-ion solutions, driven by longer life cycles, superior efficiency, and compatibility with modern solar infrastructure. While these factors collectively support a positive growth in industry. However, the sector continues to face some challenges in the form of intensified competition, limiting pricing flexibility, and substantial installed capacities relative to existing demand, creating pressure on industry-wide profitability. During FY25 (March-25), the revenue of the Company recorded a slight decline of ~7%, mainly due to downwards prices adjustments caused by prevailing local market dynamics, however volumes posted a positive growth of ~16%. Profitability margins remained under pressure, with the gross profit margin at ~16.2% (Mar’24: ~18.9%) and net margin at ~2.6% (Mar’24: ~4.9%), reflecting heightened competition and constrained ability to fully pass on cost escalations. During the period under review EXIDE maintained its market share of ~16%. Going forward, the Company remains committed to product modernization and diversification. It has introduced maintenance-free and tubular batteries and is currently importing lithium-ion units, with plans to localize production as market demand strengthens. EXIDE is also expanding its offerings in integrated solar solutions and exploring opportunities in the chemicals segment. The Company’s financial risk profile remains adequate, supported by manageable working capital requirements, satisfactory cash flows, and comfortable coverage metrics. The capital structure is moderately leveraged, with short-term borrowings dominating the debt mix, a trend expected to continue in the absence of major CAPEX plans in the near term.

Key Rating Drivers

Ratings are dependent on the sustainability of the growth trajectory in the topline and profitability matrix while retaining sufficient cash flows, coverages, and market share along with improvement in the sales volumes. However, adherence to maintaining its debt metrics at an adequate level is a prerequisite.

Profile
Legal Structure

Exide Pakistan Limited (the Company) is a limited liability company and is incorporated in Pakistan. The address of its registered office is A-44, Hill Street, Manghopir Road, S.I.T.E, Karachi, Pakistan. The Company is listed on the Pakistan Stock Exchange.


Background

EXIDE Pakistan Limited (“EXIDE” or “the Company”) was incorporated in 1953 as a private limited company in technical collaboration with Chloride Group PLC, United Kingdom, a global battery manufacturer with operations in over 30 countries at that time. The Company commenced local manufacturing with technical support from Chloride Technical and was subsequently listed on the Karachi Stock Exchange (now PSX) in 1982. Over the decades, EXIDE has evolved into one of Pakistan’s leading manufacturers and suppliers of lead-acid batteries, offering diversified power-storage solutions for the automotive, household inverter/backup, industrial, and network segments. In addition to its core battery portfolio, the Company has expanded into complementary segments including chemicals, industrial acids, and integrated solar-energy solutions. EXIDE maintains a strong domestic footprint supported by an extensive distribution network and also caters to select export markets, notably Afghanistan. The Company is primarily owned by the Hashwani family through associated shareholdings, reflecting longstanding sponsor commitment and continuity of strategic direction.


Operations

EXIDE Pakistan Limited operates as a fully integrated manufacturer and supplier of power-storage solutions, with its core activities focused on the production of automotive, industrial, UPS, telecom, and solar-compatible lead-acid batteries, alongside the manufacturing of chemicals and industrial acids. The Company’s operational footprint comprises battery production facilities located at S.I.T.E., Karachi, and Hub, Balochistan, while its chemical and acid plants operate from S.I.T.E. and Bin Qasim, Karachi. EXIDE’s diversified product range supports multiple end-user segments, including vehicles, household backup systems, solar installations, telecom networks, and industrial grid applications. In response to the growing demand for alternative energy, the Company has also expanded into integrated solar-energy solutions for residential, commercial, and industrial customers. Its nationwide dealership and distribution network—complemented by warehouses and service centers in major cities such as Lahore, Rawalpindi, Peshawar, and Multan—provides strong market accessibility and ensures effective warranty and after-sales support. Over decades of operations, EXIDE has built a well-established brand presence, supported by extensive operational infrastructure and a broad customer base across the country.


Ownership
Ownership Structure

EXIDE is majority-owned by the Hashwani Family (~75.54%) while the Financial Institutions and other companiesown about ~16.24% with the general public holding ~8.22% of the company shares


Stability

The ownership structure has remained largely stable over previous years and is expected to remain unchanged in the near future, as it is primarily dominated by the company’s sponsors. The presence of financial institutions further supports the stability of the ownership, providing additional oversight and confidence in the company’s governance framework.


Business Acumen

The business acumen of Exide Pakistan Limited’s leadership, particularly the sponsoring Hashwani family, is considered strong, built over decades of experience. The family has been leading the company since 1991, with key figures such as Arif Hashwani (Chairman) and Altaf Hashwani (Non-Executive Director) guiding strategic initiatives, while Arshad Shahzada (MD/CEO) brings extensive professional experience across industries. The management’s deep understanding of the battery manufacturing business has supported Exide’s sustained market position. The sponsors have also demonstrated their capability through successful diversification into other sectors, notably the textile retail industry with the “Sana Safinaz” brand, providing additional financial strength to support the company. Since its incorporation in 1953 in association with the UK’s Chloride Group PLC, Exide has remained a prominent player in the Pakistani market, receiving multiple Top 25 Companies Awards and Corporate Excellence Awards, and expanding its offerings to include solar energy solutions, reflecting sound professional management and strategic foresight.


Financial Strength

The financial strength of Exide Pakistan Limited is considered good, supported by the robust backing of its main sponsors, the Hashwani family, who possess a strong financial profile with diversified investments across sectors such as textiles, retail, and other businesses. On a consolidated basis, the company reported a topline of PKR 23,895 million and an equity base of PKR 6,822 million as of March 2025. The sponsors’ financial capacity and diversification provide additional stability and support to the company’s operations and growth initiatives, underpinning confidence in its long-term financial resilience.


Governance
Board Structure

The overall control of Exide Pakistan Limited vests with its eight-member Board of Directors, comprising the CEO, CFO, executive directors, and independent directors. The Board is led by Mr. Arif Hashwani (Chairman), a member of the sponsoring family with over 30 years of association, ensuring continuity and strategic oversight. The Hashwani family, holding approximately 75% of the company’s shares, maintains control, with Arshad Shahzada (MD/CEO) managing day-to-day operations, supported by family members and other directors. The Board oversees strategy, governance, and operational performance, balancing family interests with those of financial institutions. Key members include Arif Hashwani (Chairman), Arshad Shahzada (MD/CEO), Syed Haider Mehdi (CFO & Executive Director), along with Altaf Hashwani, Hussain Hashwani, Zaver Hashwani, Mrs. Navin Salim Merchant, and Mr. Amin Manji. The structure reflects strong sponsor control while incorporating independent oversight and professional management.


Members’ Profile

The Board of Exide Pakistan Limited reflects strong business acumen, combining long-standing family leadership with professional and independent oversight. Mr. Arif Hashwani (Chairman & Non-Executive Director) has led strategic initiatives since 1991, driving growth and diversification. Mr. Altaf Hashwani (Non-Executive Director), appointed in 1991, has expertise in supply chain management and currently serves as CEO of SSFR (Pvt) Limited. Mr. Hussain Hashwani (Non-Executive Director) brings business experience from his long association with Hassanali Sons. Ms. Zaver Hashwani (Non-Executive Director), a Wharton business graduate, serves as director at SSFR (Pvt) Limited. Mr. Arshad Shahzada (MD/CEO) has been associated with Exide since 1986, leading operations post-merger with extensive industry experience and an Electrical Engineering degree from UET Lahore. Mr. Syed Haider Mehdi (CFO & Executive Director), with Exide since 1992 and Executive Director since 2004, is a qualified accountant and corporate secretary. Mrs. Navin Salim Merchant (Independent Director), serving since 2021, is a law graduate, certified director, and senior partner at Merchant Law Associates with multiple board appointments. Mr. Amin Manji (Independent Director), appointed in 2023, brings over 30 years of global experience in financial services and IT, currently serving as SEVP and Group Chief for IT at National Bank of Pakistan. Collectively, the Board combines sponsor control with professional expertise and independent oversight, supporting effective governance and strategic decision-making.


Board Effectiveness

The Board of Exide Pakistan Limited operates with structured oversight, supported by the Audit Committee and the Human Resource Committee (HR Committee) to assist in monitoring operational and financial matters. Board meetings are held regularly, with detailed agendas circulated in advance and comprehensive minutes maintained. Director attendance is robust, reflecting active engagement and commitment to governance, strategic oversight, and effective decision-making.


Financial Transparency

Exide Pakistan Limited’s financial statements for the year ended March 2025 were audited by Yousuf Adil & Co., a firm listed in the “A” category on the SBP’s panel of auditors. The auditors expressed an unqualified opinion, reflecting transparency, adherence to accounting standards, and reliability of the company’s financial reporting.


Management
Organizational Structure

Exide Pakistan Limited operates a multi-tiered organizational structure designed to ensure professional oversight and operational efficiency. The company is led by the Board of Directors, chaired by Mr. Arif Hashwani, and the CEO, Mr. Arshad Shahzada, supported by the management team, including the CFO, Mr. Syed Haider Mehdi. The organization is structured across key functions: Finance & Accounts, Sales & Marketing, Production (Plant), Supply Chain, Information Technology (IT), and Human Resources (HR), with specialized departments and committees, including Audit and HR Committees, providing additional governance. This layered structure supports Exide’s core battery manufacturing and energy solutions operations, ensuring effective decision-making, compliance, and strategic management across all business functions.


Management Team

Exide Pakistan Limited’s management team combines long-standing experience with strong technical and functional expertise. Mr. Arshad Shahzada (CEO/MD), a Bachelor of Engineering, has been associated with the company for over three decades and oversees strategic, operational, and financial decisions. Mr. Syed Haider Mehdi (CFO, FCMA), with over 40 years of experience and 30 years at Exide, manages financial strategy and reporting. Other key members include Mr. Muhammad Arshad Amir (Country Head Sales & Marketing, MBA), responsible for sales and market operations, and Mr. Shahzad Rashid (General Manager Plant, B.Eng.), overseeing production. The management team’s long tenure and technical proficiency support effective decision-making, operational continuity, and strategic execution across the company’s battery manufacturing and energy solutions business.


Effectiveness

Exide Pakistan Limited maintains a well-defined and functional organizational structure, with each department head accountable for departmental operations and reporting directly to the CEO. The management is supported by experienced leadership and integrated IT systems (SAP), which facilitate operational efficiency and decision-making. While the structure is generally effective, formalizing management committees and documenting their meeting minutes could further strengthen inter-departmental coordination and enhance overall management effectiveness.


MIS

EXIDE Pakistan’s core operating software is “SAP Enterprise ECC 6.0 EHP 5” implemented at the head office, allmanufacturing sites. Various modules have been implemented including Sales & Distribution, Materials Management, Production Planning, Financials, Controlling, and Human Resource Management.


Control Environment

The principal business operation of the company is manufacturing batteries, chemicals, and acid. The company deploys state-of-the-art technology for producing batteries while ensuring that the production processes complywith local and international standards.


Business Risk
Industry Dynamics

The sales and production of batteries in Pakistan are closely linked to energy shortfalls, developments in the automobile sector, and growth in backup power and renewable energy solutions. The organized market is dominated by Exide, Atlas Battery, and Pakistan Accumulators (Volta & Osaka), with significant presence in automotive, industrial, and inverter segments. During FY24, total battery production declined by ~13% YoY to ~8.7 million units, reflecting subdued demand from the automobile sector amid the economic slowdown. However, in 3MFY25, production increased to ~2.4 million units, a YoY rise of ~4.3%, driven by improved macroeconomic indicators and a ~25% YoY rebound in automobile production. Demand for heavy and medium-sized batteries continues to be supported by power shortages, particularly during summer, and the growing adoption of solar energy solutions. Looking ahead, the initiation of Electric Vehicle (EV) assembling projects, including locally assembled Hybrid Electric Vehicles (HEVs) and Battery Electric Vehicles (BEVs), is expected to drive demand for low-maintenance hybrid batteries. Additionally, developments in local lithium mining and battery manufacturing by groups like HUBCO are likely to shape future growth in the lithium-ion segment. Overall, despite macroeconomic volatility, the battery industry demonstrates resilience, supported by replacement demand, renewable energy adoption, and a recovering automotive sector.


Relative Position

EXIDE is one of the big players in the industry. As per the Exide management representation the Company has a market share of ~16% with a slight improvement in margins.


Revenues

During 3MFY26, Exide Pakistan Limited posted net sales of PKR 7,049 million, reflecting an 18% YoY growth . For FY25, annual sales clocked in at PKR 23,895 million, down by ~6.9% YoY compared to PKR 25,668 million in FY24. The topline contraction in FY25 stemmed from reduced automotive battery volumes and muted demand from OEMs, partly offset by modest recovery in the solar and industrial segments.


Margins

The gross profit margin stood at 14.6% in 3MFY26 (FY25: 16.2%; FY24: 18.9%), reflecting continued pressure from elevated raw material and energy costs amid limited pricing flexibility. The operating margin also declined to 8.4% (FY25: 7.9%; FY24: 12.5%), while the net profit margin improved marginally to 3.2% in 3MFY26 (FY25: 2.6%; FY24: 4.9%). The moderation in profitability continues to be driven by higher financing costs and increased competitive pricing in the replacement market.


Sustainability

Exide continues to pursue growth through market and product diversification. The company is expanding its customer base and geographic reach, supported by additions to its product portfolio such as tubular and MF batteries. Management remains focused on closely tracking performance against financial projections to guide uture growth.


Financial Risk
Working capital

The net working capital cycle lengthened to 121 days as of 3MFY26 (FY25: 120 days; FY24: 78 days), driven by higher receivable days (58 days) and sustained inventory buildup (88 days) to support seasonal demand. The current ratio improved to 4.7x (FY25: 3.8x; FY24: 2.5x), reflecting a stronger liquidity buffer amid slower payables turnover (26 days). The Company continues to rely on short-term bank lines to finance its working capital needs.


Coverages

During 3MFY26, EBITDA-to-finance cost deteriorated to (1.4)x (FY25: 4.1x; FY24: 4.8x), reflecting seasonality and front-loaded costs in the initial quarter. Conversely, FCFO-to-finance cost weakened to (2.1)x (FY25: 0.9x; FY24: 2.9x), owing to negative operating cash flows of PKR 384 million in the period. Sustained improvement in operating cash generation and cost optimization will remain key to restoring coverage strength over the coming quarters.


Capitalization

As of June 2025, total borrowings stood at PKR 5,800 million, up from PKR 5,499 million in FY25 and PKR 2,863 million in FY24. Short-term debt comprised ~96.9% of total borrowings, indicating heavy reliance on working capital financing. Consequently, the leverage ratio increased slightly to 45.4% (FY25: 45.6%; FY24: 33.1%). Despite higher gearing, the Company maintains adequate equity backing of PKR 6,969 million, providing moderate financial flexibility. Future debt rationalization and improved operating cash flows will be essential to maintain a stable capital structure.


 
 

Dec-25

www.pacra.com


Jun-25
3M
Mar-25
12M
Mar-24
12M
Mar-23
12M
Management Audited Audited Audited
A. BALANCE SHEET
1. Non-Current Assets 2,238 2,236 2,120 2,091
2. Investments 0 0 0 0
3. Related Party Exposure 0 0 0 0
4. Current Assets 13,411 14,057 11,960 8,094
a. Inventories 6,542 7,117 5,821 4,637
b. Trade Receivables 4,884 4,107 4,402 482
5. Total Assets 15,649 16,293 14,080 10,186
6. Current Liabilities 2,880 3,746 4,697 2,619
a. Trade Payables 1,719 2,245 3,429 1,015
7. Borrowings 5,800 5,499 2,863 2,217
8. Related Party Exposure 0 225 241 250
9. Non-Current Liabilities 0 0 0 0
10. Net Assets 6,969 6,823 6,280 5,100
11. Shareholders' Equity 6,969 6,823 6,280 5,100
B. INCOME STATEMENT
1. Sales 7,049 23,895 25,668 23,402
a. Cost of Good Sold (6,017) (20,026) (20,816) (20,039)
2. Gross Profit 1,033 3,869 4,852 3,363
a. Operating Expenses (438) (1,976) (1,644) (1,480)
3. Operating Profit 595 1,894 3,208 1,882
a. Non Operating Income or (Expense) (41) (122) (195) (313)
4. Profit or (Loss) before Interest and Tax 553 1,772 3,013 1,570
a. Total Finance Cost (187) (731) (858) (417)
b. Taxation (143) (427) (900) (398)
6. Net Income Or (Loss) 223 614 1,255 755
C. CASH FLOW STATEMENT
a. Free Cash Flows from Operations (FCFO) (384) 660 2,454 1,999
b. Net Cash from Operating Activities before Working Capital Changes (606) (105) 1,760 1,572
c. Changes in Working Capital 0 (1,647) (3,199) 1,289
1. Net Cash provided by Operating Activities (606) (1,752) (1,440) 2,862
2. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Investing Activities (50) (316) (215) (332)
3. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Financing Activities (236) 455 1,296 (1,043)
4. Net Cash generated or (Used) during the period (893) (1,613) (359) 1,488
D. RATIO ANALYSIS
1. Performance
a. Sales Growth (for the period) 18.0% -6.9% 9.7% 62.9%
b. Gross Profit Margin 14.6% 16.2% 18.9% 14.4%
c. Net Profit Margin 3.2% 2.6% 4.9% 3.2%
d. Cash Conversion Efficiency (FCFO adjusted for Working Capital/Sales) -5.5% -4.1% -2.9% 14.1%
e. Return on Equity [ Net Profit Margin * Asset Turnover * (Total Assets/Shareholders' Equity )] 13.0% 9.4% 22.0% 16.9%
2. Working Capital Management
a. Gross Working Capital (Average Days) 147 164 109 86
b. Net Working Capital (Average Days) 121 120 78 72
c. Current Ratio (Current Assets / Current Liabilities) 4.7 3.8 2.5 3.1
3. Coverages
a. EBITDA / Finance Cost -1.4 4.1 4.8 6.5
b. FCFO / Finance Cost+CMLTB+Excess STB -2.0 0.9 2.8 4.6
c. Debt Payback (Total Borrowings+Excess STB) / (FCFO-Finance Cost) -0.1 -7.0 0.3 0.3
4. Capital Structure
a. Total Borrowings / (Total Borrowings+Shareholders' Equity) 45.4% 45.6% 33.1% 32.6%
b. Interest or Markup Payable (Days) 79.9 99.6 101.0 61.9
c. Entity Average Borrowing Rate 13.1% 14.1% 24.7% 15.5%

Dec-25

www.pacra.com

Dec-25

www.pacra.com

  1. Rating Team Statements
    1. Rating is just an opinion about the creditworthiness of the entity and does not constitute a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell any security of the entity rated or to buy, hold, or sell the security rated, as the case may be. (Chapter III; 14-3-(x))
    2. Conflict of Interest
      1. The Rating Team or any of their family members have no interest in this rating (Chapter III; 12-2-(j))
      2. PACRA, the analysts involved in the rating process, and members of its rating committee and their family members do not have any conflict of interest relating to the rating done by them (Chapter III; 12-2-(e) & (k))
      3. The analyst is not a substantial shareholder of the customer being rated by PACRA [Annexure F; d-(ii)]
      4. Explanation: for the purpose of the above clause, the term "family members" shall include only those family members who are dependent on the analyst and members of the rating committee.
  2. Restrictions
    1. No director, officer, or employee of PACRA communicates the information acquired by him for use for rating purposes to any other person, except where required under law to do so. (Chapter III; 10-(5))
    2. PACRA does not disclose or discuss with outside parties or make improper use of the non-public information which has come to its knowledge during a business relationship with the customer. (Chapter III; 10-7-(d))
    3. PACRA does not make proposals or recommendations regarding the activities of rated entities that could impact a credit rating of the entity subject to rating. (Chapter III; 10-7-(k))
  3. Conduct of Business
    1. PACRA fulfills its obligations in a fair, efficient, transparent, and ethical manner and renders high standards of services in performing its functions and obligations. (Chapter III; 11-A-(a))
    2. PACRA uses due care in the preparation of this Rating Report. Our information has been obtained from sources we consider to be reliable, but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. PACRA does not, in every instance, independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing this Rating Report. (Clause 11-(A)(p))
    3. PACRA prohibits its employees and analysts from soliciting money, gifts, or favors from anyone with whom PACRA conducts business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(q))
    4. PACRA ensures before the commencement of the rating process that an analyst or employee has not had a recent employment or other significant business or personal relationship with the rated entity that may cause or may be perceived as causing a conflict of interest. (Chapter III; 11-A-(r))
    5. PACRA maintains the principle of integrity in seeking rating business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(u))
    6. PACRA promptly investigates in the event of misconduct or a breach of the policies, procedures, and controls, and takes appropriate steps to rectify any weaknesses to prevent any recurrence, along with suitable punitive action against the responsible employee(s). (Chapter III; 11-B-(m))
  4. Independence & Conflict of Interest
    1. PACRA receives compensation from the entity being rated or any third party for the rating services it offers. The receipt of this compensation has no influence on PACRA’s opinions or other analytical processes. In all instances, PACRA is committed to preserving the objectivity, integrity, and independence of its ratings. Our relationship is governed by two distinct mandates: i) rating mandate - signed with the entity being rated or issuer of the debt instrument, and ii) fee mandate - signed with the payer, which can be different from the entity.
    2. PACRA does not provide consultancy/advisory services or other services to any of its customers or their associated companies and associated undertakings that are being rated or have been rated by it during the preceding three years, unless it has an adequate mechanism in place ensuring that the provision of such services does not lead to a conflict of interest situation with its rating activities. (Chapter III; 12-2-(d))
    3. PACRA discloses that no shareholder directly or indirectly holding 10% or more of the share capital of PACRA also holds directly or indirectly 10% or more of the share capital of the entity which is subject to rating or the entity which issued the instrument subject to rating by PACRA. (Chapter III; 12-2-(f))
    4. PACRA ensures that the rating assigned to an entity or instrument is not affected by the existence of a business relationship between PACRA and the entity or any other party, or the non-existence of such a relationship. (Chapter III; 12-2-(i))
    5. PACRA ensures that the analysts or any of their family members shall not buy, sell, or engage in any transaction in any security which falls in the analyst’s area of primary analytical responsibility. This clause, however, does not apply to investments in securities through collective investment schemes. (Chapter III; 12-2-(l))
    6. PACRA has established policies and procedures governing investments and trading in securities by its employees and for monitoring the same to prevent insider trading, market manipulation, or any other market abuse. (Chapter III; 11-B-(g))
  5. Monitoring and Review
    1. PACRA monitors all the outstanding ratings continuously, and any potential change therein due to any event associated with the issuer, the security arrangement, the industry, etc., is disseminated to the market immediately and in an effective manner after appropriate consultation with the entity/issuer. (Chapter III; 17-(a))
    2. PACRA reviews all the outstanding ratings periodically on an annual basis. Provided that public dissemination of annual review and in an instance of change in rating will be made. (Chapter III; 17-(b))
    3. PACRA initiates an immediate review of the outstanding rating upon becoming aware of any information that may reasonably be expected to result in downgrading of the rating. (Chapter III; 17-(c))
    4. PACRA engages with the issuer and the debt securities trustee to remain updated on all information pertaining to the rating of the entity/instrument. (Chapter III; 17-(d))
  6. Probability of Default
    1. PACRA’s Rating Scale reflects the expectation of credit risk. The highest rating has the lowest relative likelihood of default (i.e., probability). PACRA’s transition studies capture the historical performance behavior of a specific rating notch. Transition behavior of the assigned rating can be obtained from PACRA’s Transition Study available at our website. (www.pacra.com) However, the actual transition of rating may not follow the pattern observed in the past. (Chapter III; 14-3(f)(vii))
  7. Proprietary Information
    1. All information contained herein is considered proprietary by PACRA. Hence, none of the information in this document can be copied or otherwise reproduced, stored, or disseminated in whole or in part in any form or by any means whatsoever by any person without PACRA’s prior written consent.

Dec-25

www.pacra.com