Rating History
Dissemination Date Long-Term Rating Short-Term Rating Outlook Action Rating Watch
26-Dec-25 AA- A1 Stable Maintain -
27-Dec-24 AA- A1 Stable Maintain -
29-Dec-23 AA- A1 Stable Initial -
About the Entity

DEDL was incorporated on July 11, 2013, as a private limited company in Pakistan and is wholly owned by the Abdul Razak Dawood (ARD) Family. Abdul Razak Dawood holds the majority stake at 94.27%, with the remaining shares distributed among family members: Bilquis Dawood (2.86%), Taimur Dawood (1.15%), Faisal Dawood (1.15%), and Mehreen Dawood (0.57%). The Company is governed by a three-member Board of Directors, predominantly represented by the family. Mr. Taimur Dawood, who also serves as CEO, brings over 30 years of experience in engineering, product marketing, project finance, strategy development, and mergers and acquisitions. The Company’s registered office is located at 18-KM, Ferozepur Road, Lahore.

Rating Rationale

DEL Engineering Domestic (Private) Limited (“DEDL” or “the Company”) is one of the keys holding companies of the DESCON Group, a prominent Pakistani multinational operating across a wide range of sectors, including Oil & Gas, Power, Hydro Power, Dams and Barrages, Fertilizer, Renewable Energy, Industrial, Chemical, and Petrochemical industries. The Group maintains a strong international footprint, primarily concentrated in the Middle East, with operations extending to the UAE, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Oman, Iraq, South Africa, and Pakistan. Within this structure, DEDL oversees and manages the Group’s foreign portfolio while providing integrated services encompassing Design Engineering, Procurement, Manufacturing, Construction, Commissioning, Industrial Services, and Operations & Maintenance (O&M). Revenue largely stems from plant maintenance projects in the oil and gas sector, supplemented by construction- and fabrication-related activities. DEDL maintains a strong financial profile underpinned by its debt-free balance sheet, sizeable investment base, and steady profitability across its subsidiary network. Portfolio companies have continued to demonstrate healthy revenues and earnings across GCC markets, supporting long-term value preservation for the holding company. The Company’s business model does not require substantial capital outlays relative to project size; however, non-funded facilities remain essential for project execution. Its balance sheet comprises core investments in unlisted subsidiaries and associates, along with non-strategic short-term placements in Term Deposit Receipts (TDRs) and mutual funds, which together provide a strategic liquidity buffer against unforeseen risks. Income is primarily derived from foreign remittances and dividends from equity holdings, along with returns on short-term investments. However, income predictability remains moderated by irregular dividend timings and the absence of a formal dividend policy across the Group.

Key Rating Drivers

Governance and oversight processes continue to evolve, though the absence of formalized investment and dividend frameworks remains a qualitative constraint. Nonetheless, DEDL’s sound equity base, clean capital structure, and sustained performance of foreign subsidiaries collectively reinforce its creditworthiness. Going forward, ratings will remain dependent on the performance of existing investments, timely execution of strategic initiatives, and the maintenance of a sound project pipeline. Any sizable increase in leverage or prolonged underperformance of invested entities may exert downward pressure. Strengthening governance documentation and enhancing cash flow visibility would further support the Company’s long-term risk profile.

Profile
Background

DEL Engineering Domestic (Private) Limited (DEDL), incorporated on July 11, 2013, is a key holding company of the Descon Group, a leading Pakistani multinational headquartered in Lahore. Established in 1977, the Descon Group has evolved into a diversified engineering and industrial services conglomerate with expertise across Engineering, Procurement and Construction (EPC), construction, maintenance and industrial services, infrastructure development, manufacturing, and automation and control. The Group operates across multiple sectors, including Oil & Gas, Power, Hydro Power, Fertilizer, Chemicals, Cement, and Industrial Services, with a strong international footprint spanning the GCC region, Iraq, Pakistan, and South Africa. DEDL’s primary role is to manage the Group’s foreign portfolio and oversee investments in its subsidiaries, while also providing consultancy and support services across various industrial segments.


Structural Analysis

DEDL's organizational structure revolves around the management of its diverse portfolio of subsidiaries and associates. As of FY25, the Company holds a long-term investment portfolio of approximately ~PKR 46bln, which consists of equity stakes in subsidiaries and associates across industries like engineering, construction, and power generation. The holding company structure ensures centralized oversight of these investments, providing strategic direction and ensuring operational efficiency across all subsidiaries. The Company’s business model revolves around acquiring technological knowledge and providing comprehensive services such as plant design, construction, commissioning, and ongoing operations.


Ownership
Ownership Structure

DEDL’s ownership remains predominantly concentrated within the Dawood family, which controls approximately 94.27% of the company. The principal shareholder, Abdul Razak Dawood, maintains significant control with other family members, including Taimur Dawood, Faisal Dawood, Bilquis Dawood, and Mehreen Dawood, holding the remainder of the shares. This family-driven ownership structure ensures strategic stability and centralized decision-making, aligning with the long-term vision of the company and the Descon Group as a whole.


Stability

The stability of ownership within DEDL is assured due to the high level of control maintained by the Dawood family, who have been actively involved in the management of the company and the Descon Group for several decades. With the ownership structure firmly in the hands of the family, the company benefits from a stable governance model that ensures the continuity of the strategic direction and operational priorities across generations. This stable ownership also strengthens DEDL’s ability to weather market fluctuations and sustain long-term growth.


Business Acumen

The Descon Group, under the leadership of Abdul Razak Dawood, has demonstrated remarkable business acumen by expanding its operations across the engineering, chemical, and infrastructure sectors. Over the years, the group has made timely investments in key growth markets, particularly in the GCC region, which has allowed it to diversify its revenue streams and reduce reliance on any single market. The group’s leadership is known for its deep industry knowledge, ability to adapt to technological advancements, and expertise in risk assessment, which has greatly contributed to its ongoing success in competitive markets.


Financial Strength

The Descon Group’s financial strength is evidenced by its solid asset base and equity position. As of FY25, the group reported ~46bln long term investments. This strong financial position provides the group, and by extension DEDL, with the flexibility to pursue strategic investments, expand its operational footprint, and support subsidiaries in times of financial need. The financial soundness ensures that the company is well-equipped to navigate challenges in the global business environment.


Governance
Board Structure

DEDL’s governance structure is anchored by a three-member board from the Dawood family, including Taimur Dawood as Chairman and Faisal Dawood as Vice Chairman. The family members’ involvement in strategic decision-making ensures that the Company stays aligned with the Descon Group's long-term goals, while independent directors offer fresh perspectives and contribute to effective governance.


Members’ Profile

The board is chaired by Taimur Dawood, who has over 30 years of diversified experience in engineering, project finance, and strategic management. His leadership has been pivotal in expanding the Descon Group’s operations globally. The other directors possess extensive experience in engineering, finance, and business management, ensuring that DEDL’s strategic decisions are well-informed and grounded in industry expertise. The board’s collective experience strengthens the Company’s governance practices and ensures sound decision-making at the highest level.


Board Effectiveness

The effectiveness of DEDL’s board is supported by the establishment of four key committees: Audit, Human Resource and Remuneration, Corporate Risk Management, and Whistle Blowing. These committees provide structured oversight of the company’s operations and ensure that corporate governance standards are adhered to. The board holds regular meetings, with key performance indicators and strategic reports shared in advance, allowing for well-informed decision-making. This commitment to transparency and accountability enhances the board’s ability to govern the company effectively.


Transparency

Financial transparency is a cornerstone of DEDL’s governance practices. Crowe Hussain Chaudhury & Co., the Company’s external auditors, have consistently issued unqualified opinions on DEDL’s financial statements. This reflects the company's commitment to maintaining high standards of financial reporting, ensuring that stakeholders have access to accurate and reliable financial information.


Management
Organizational Structure

DEDL operates with a well-structured management framework that enables efficient oversight of its subsidiaries and affiliates. Key functional departments such as Finance, Strategy, Legal, and HR are centralized, while subsidiary operations retain a level of autonomy to ensure flexibility and responsiveness in their respective markets. The organizational structure is designed to facilitate collaboration and streamline decision-making across various business units, ensuring alignment with the Company’s overall strategic goals.


Management Team

The management team is led by CEO Taimur Dawood, who has over 30 years of experience in engineering, finance, and business strategy. He is supported by a team of experienced professionals, including Abdul Sohail (Company Secretary) and Junaid Asghar (CFO), each of whom brings a wealth of knowledge and expertise in their respective domains. This management team has been instrumental in driving DEDL’s growth and ensuring the successful execution of projects across diverse markets.


Management Effectiveness

DEDL’s management team has proven to be highly effective, with a track record of successfully executing numerous large-scale projects for blue-chip clients in various international markets. The Company’s ability to provide turnkey solutions, like an Engineering, Procurement, Construction, and Commissioning (EPCC) service provider, highlights the team’s operational competence. Their effective management of both technical and financial aspects of projects ensures that DEDL remains competitive and capable of meeting the evolving needs of its clients.


Control Environment

The Control Environment at DEL Engineering Domestic (Private) Limited (DEDL) plays a critical role in ensuring the Company operates within established legal, regulatory, and internal compliance frameworks. The control environment refers to the policies, procedures, and organizational structure in place to ensure efficient operations, reliable financial reporting, and adherence to regulations.


Investment Strategy
Investment Decision-making

DEDL employs a two-pronged approach to investment decision-making, with the Strategy team focused on long-term growth opportunities and the Treasury team managing short-term investments. The Strategy team evaluates new ventures and oversees capital allocation, ensuring that investments align with the company’s long-term goals. The Treasury team manages liquid assets, focusing on low-risk, stable investments such as TDRs and optimizer funds.


Investment Policy

DEDL’s investment policy is conservative, prioritizing stability and low-risk investments. The company’s long-term investment portfolio is concentrated in subsidiaries within the engineering sector, with significant exposure to markets in the GCC, particularly Saudi Arabia, UAE, and Qatar. Short-term investments provide liquidity and flexibility, enabling the company to manage cash flow efficiently.


Investment Committee Effectiveness

The investment team works closely with the Board to assess the performance of existing investments and identify new opportunities. The quarterly reviews conducted by the team ensure that investment decisions remain aligned with the company’s strategic objectives. The Board’s active involvement in investment discussions enhances the overall effectiveness of DEDL’s investment strategy.


Business Risk
Diversification

DEDL’s investment strategy is characterized by geographical diversification, with operations spread across several key markets in the Middle East and South Asia. This diversification reduces the company’s exposure to any single market and mitigates region-specific risks. By maintaining a global portfolio, DEDL can take advantage of growth opportunities in emerging markets while minimizing the impact of local economic downturns.


Portfolio Assessment

The company’s portfolio includes both core investments in subsidiaries and non-strategic short-term investments. This balance allows DEDL to maintain liquidity while also supporting long-term growth through its subsidiary operations. The investment in high-growth sectors like engineering and construction provides stability and supports sustained profitability.


Income Assessment

DEDL’s income profile in FY25 remained primarily investment-driven, supported by dividend income and returns on short-term investments. During FY25, the Company reported total investment income of PKR ~709 mln, reflecting a recovery from the loss position recorded in the previous year. Dividend income of PKR 109 million and profit on term deposit receipts contributed to earnings, while operating expenses remained contained. Income visibility at the holding-company level continues to depend on dividend remittances from subsidiaries, which remain opportunistic rather than structurally predictable


Financial Risk
Coverages

DEDL’s financial risk profile is characterized by its zero debt and minimal reliance on external financing. The Company’s lack of financial liabilities reduces its exposure to interest rate risk and ensures that it is not burdened by debt repayments. The absence of debt provides the Company with significant financial flexibility and allows it to focus on long-term value creation without the constraints of leverage.


Capital Structure

DEDL operates with a robust equity base and zero debt, ensuring financial stability and flexibility. The company’s minimal leverage allows it to retain full control over its financial resources and ensures that it is not exposed to the risks associated with high levels of borrowing. This conservative approach to capital structure supports the company’s long-term growth objectives and reduces financial risk.It is noted that certain portfolio companies operate with leverage at the operating level to support project execution and growth requirements. While this leverage is ring-fenced within subsidiaries and does not translate into direct financial obligations for the holding company, it introduces an indirect exposure to operating and sectoral cycles, which continues to be monitored from a group-risk perspective.


Consolidated Position

While DEDL itself does not engage in operational activities, its subsidiaries generate substantial revenue, contributing significantly to the company’s consolidated financial position. For FY25, consolidated revenue stood at ~PKR 139 bln, a 56% increase from the previous year, with net profit rising by ~23%.Based on entity-level data shared by management, key subsidiaries continue to generate substantial revenues and profits during FY25, supporting the overall economic strength of the group.


 
 

Dec-25

www.pacra.com


Jun-25
12M
Jun-24
12M
Jun-23
12M
Management Audited Audited
A. BALANCE SHEET
1. Investments 1,630 1,019 1,141
2. Related Party Investments 45,043 37,920 33,101
3. Non-Current Assets 0 0 0
4. Current Assets 45 8 268
5. Total Assets 46,718 38,947 34,510
6. Current Liabilities 6 6 11
7. Borrowings 0 0 0
8. Related Party Exposure 0 0 0
9. Non-Current Liabilities 0 0 0
10. Net Assets 46,712 38,941 34,498
11. Shareholders' Equity 46,712 38,941 34,292
B. INCOME STATEMENT
1. Total Investment Income 647 610 657
a. Cost of Investments 0 0 0
2. Net Investment Income 647 610 657
a. Other Income 63 0 0
b. Operating Expenses (36) (592) (2)
4. Profit or (Loss) before Interest and Tax 674 18 656
a. Taxation (25) (38) (24)
6. Net Income Or (Loss) 648 (21) 632
C. CASH FLOW STATEMENT
a. Total Cash Flow 517 (284) 509
b. Net Cash from Operating Activities before Working Capital Changes 517 (284) 509
c. Changes in Working Capital 1 1 0
1. Net Cash provided by Operating Activities 518 (283) 509
2. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Investing Activities (493) 377 (453)
3. Net increase (decrease) in long term borrowings 0 0 0
4. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Financing Activities 0 (150) 0
5. Net Cash generated or (Used) during the period 25 (56) 56
D. RATIO ANALYSIS
1. Performance
a. Asset Concentration (Market Value of Largest Investment / Market Value of Equity Investments) 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
b. Core Investments / Market Value of Equity Investments 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
c. Marketable Investments / Total Investments at Market Value 37.5% 27.3% 29.6%
2. Coverages
a. TCF / Finance Cost 517.2 -283.6 508.6
b. TCF / Finance Cost + CMLTB 517.2 -283.6 508.6
c. Loan to Value (Funding / Market Value of Equity Investments ) 0.0 0.0 0.0
3. Capital Structure (Total Debt/Total Debt+Equity)
a. Leveraging [Funding / (Funding + Shareholders' Equity] 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
b. (Funding + Off Balance Sheet Exposure) / Shareholders' Equity 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
E. NOTES
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

Dec-25

www.pacra.com

Dec-25

www.pacra.com

  1. Rating Team Statements
    1. Rating is just an opinion about the creditworthiness of the entity and does not constitute a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell any security of the entity rated or to buy, hold, or sell the security rated, as the case may be. (Chapter III; 14-3-(x))
    2. Conflict of Interest
      1. The Rating Team or any of their family members have no interest in this rating (Chapter III; 12-2-(j))
      2. PACRA, the analysts involved in the rating process, and members of its rating committee and their family members do not have any conflict of interest relating to the rating done by them (Chapter III; 12-2-(e) & (k))
      3. The analyst is not a substantial shareholder of the customer being rated by PACRA [Annexure F; d-(ii)]
      4. Explanation: for the purpose of the above clause, the term "family members" shall include only those family members who are dependent on the analyst and members of the rating committee.
  2. Restrictions
    1. No director, officer, or employee of PACRA communicates the information acquired by him for use for rating purposes to any other person, except where required under law to do so. (Chapter III; 10-(5))
    2. PACRA does not disclose or discuss with outside parties or make improper use of the non-public information which has come to its knowledge during a business relationship with the customer. (Chapter III; 10-7-(d))
    3. PACRA does not make proposals or recommendations regarding the activities of rated entities that could impact a credit rating of the entity subject to rating. (Chapter III; 10-7-(k))
  3. Conduct of Business
    1. PACRA fulfills its obligations in a fair, efficient, transparent, and ethical manner and renders high standards of services in performing its functions and obligations. (Chapter III; 11-A-(a))
    2. PACRA uses due care in the preparation of this Rating Report. Our information has been obtained from sources we consider to be reliable, but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. PACRA does not, in every instance, independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing this Rating Report. (Clause 11-(A)(p))
    3. PACRA prohibits its employees and analysts from soliciting money, gifts, or favors from anyone with whom PACRA conducts business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(q))
    4. PACRA ensures before the commencement of the rating process that an analyst or employee has not had a recent employment or other significant business or personal relationship with the rated entity that may cause or may be perceived as causing a conflict of interest. (Chapter III; 11-A-(r))
    5. PACRA maintains the principle of integrity in seeking rating business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(u))
    6. PACRA promptly investigates in the event of misconduct or a breach of the policies, procedures, and controls, and takes appropriate steps to rectify any weaknesses to prevent any recurrence, along with suitable punitive action against the responsible employee(s). (Chapter III; 11-B-(m))
  4. Independence & Conflict of Interest
    1. PACRA receives compensation from the entity being rated or any third party for the rating services it offers. The receipt of this compensation has no influence on PACRA’s opinions or other analytical processes. In all instances, PACRA is committed to preserving the objectivity, integrity, and independence of its ratings. Our relationship is governed by two distinct mandates: i) rating mandate - signed with the entity being rated or issuer of the debt instrument, and ii) fee mandate - signed with the payer, which can be different from the entity.
    2. PACRA does not provide consultancy/advisory services or other services to any of its customers or their associated companies and associated undertakings that are being rated or have been rated by it during the preceding three years, unless it has an adequate mechanism in place ensuring that the provision of such services does not lead to a conflict of interest situation with its rating activities. (Chapter III; 12-2-(d))
    3. PACRA discloses that no shareholder directly or indirectly holding 10% or more of the share capital of PACRA also holds directly or indirectly 10% or more of the share capital of the entity which is subject to rating or the entity which issued the instrument subject to rating by PACRA. (Chapter III; 12-2-(f))
    4. PACRA ensures that the rating assigned to an entity or instrument is not affected by the existence of a business relationship between PACRA and the entity or any other party, or the non-existence of such a relationship. (Chapter III; 12-2-(i))
    5. PACRA ensures that the analysts or any of their family members shall not buy, sell, or engage in any transaction in any security which falls in the analyst’s area of primary analytical responsibility. This clause, however, does not apply to investments in securities through collective investment schemes. (Chapter III; 12-2-(l))
    6. PACRA has established policies and procedures governing investments and trading in securities by its employees and for monitoring the same to prevent insider trading, market manipulation, or any other market abuse. (Chapter III; 11-B-(g))
  5. Monitoring and Review
    1. PACRA monitors all the outstanding ratings continuously, and any potential change therein due to any event associated with the issuer, the security arrangement, the industry, etc., is disseminated to the market immediately and in an effective manner after appropriate consultation with the entity/issuer. (Chapter III; 17-(a))
    2. PACRA reviews all the outstanding ratings periodically on an annual basis. Provided that public dissemination of annual review and in an instance of change in rating will be made. (Chapter III; 17-(b))
    3. PACRA initiates an immediate review of the outstanding rating upon becoming aware of any information that may reasonably be expected to result in downgrading of the rating. (Chapter III; 17-(c))
    4. PACRA engages with the issuer and the debt securities trustee to remain updated on all information pertaining to the rating of the entity/instrument. (Chapter III; 17-(d))
  6. Probability of Default
    1. PACRA’s Rating Scale reflects the expectation of credit risk. The highest rating has the lowest relative likelihood of default (i.e., probability). PACRA’s transition studies capture the historical performance behavior of a specific rating notch. Transition behavior of the assigned rating can be obtained from PACRA’s Transition Study available at our website. (www.pacra.com) However, the actual transition of rating may not follow the pattern observed in the past. (Chapter III; 14-3(f)(vii))
  7. Proprietary Information
    1. All information contained herein is considered proprietary by PACRA. Hence, none of the information in this document can be copied or otherwise reproduced, stored, or disseminated in whole or in part in any form or by any means whatsoever by any person without PACRA’s prior written consent.

Dec-25

www.pacra.com