Rating History
Dissemination Date Long-Term Rating Short-Term Rating Outlook Action Rating Watch
12-May-26 A- A2 Stable Initial -
About the Entity

Treet Battery Limited (TBL) is a public limited company, listed on the Pakistan Stock Exchange (PSX) in 2023 following its strategic demerger from First Treet Manufacturing Modaraba (FTMM). The parent company, Treet Corporation Limited, holds ~86.18%, and Treet Holdings Limited holds a stake of ~1.81% in the Company. The Board of Directors comprises eight members, where Syed Shahid Ali serves as the Chairman, while Syed Sheharyar Ali holds the position of CEO.

Rating Rationale

Treet Battery Limited (“TBL” or “the Company”) is engaged in the manufacturing and sale of lead-acid batteries, with a strategic focus on maintenance-free and deep-cycle variants, marketed under the “Daewoo Battery” brand. The Company was established to introduce locally manufactured maintenance-free technology-based batteries, positioning itself as a pioneer in this segment. TBL’s product portfolio is positioned in the premium segment, reflecting a focus on higher performance and reliability compared to conventional offerings. The Company operates a technologically advanced manufacturing facility based on Korean technology, supported by a comprehensive in-house testing and quality control system, ensuring consistent product reliability. The domestic lead-acid battery sector is at an inflection point, shaped by evolving energy consumption patterns, a recovering automobile market, and a gradual shift in storage technologies. Demand remains anchored in the replacement segment, the most consistent source of offtake. Within this, backup power batteries dominate in value terms, reflecting sustained reliance on uninterrupted power across residential and industrial users, while automobile battery replacements account for a higher share in volume, supported by the sizeable on-road vehicle base. The recovery in automobile sales, underpinned by improving macroeconomic conditions, easing inflation, and a more favorable interest rate outlook, is generating incremental demand for OEM-linked sales. At the same time, rising adoption of solar solutions is broadening the demand base, with batteries serving as a critical storage component amid elevated electricity tariffs and shifting consumption patterns. Despite these positive demand drivers, the sector remains characterized by intense competition and relatively high installed capacity, which collectively constrain margins. Additionally, volatility in raw material prices, particularly lead, and exchange rate movements continue to influence cost structures and profitability across industry participants. Currently, the industry is also witnessing a gradual transition from conventional lead-acid to lithium-ion technologies, driven by longer lifecycles, higher efficiency, and compatibility with modern applications. To support this transition, TBL has entered into a strategic partnership with a leading Chinese manufacturer, positioning the Company within the evolving domestic energy storage market, particularly in high-end solar and industrial backup segments. During FY25, the Company’s topline remained stable and recorded at ~PKR 8,844mln in FY25 (FY24: ~PKR 8,733mln). Concurrently, the Company achieved a notable improvement in its profitability profile across all levels, driven by cost efficiencies and lower finance costs. This positive trajectory sustained its momentum into the 1HFY26 as well. The Company’s financial risk profile is categorized by modest coverages, cash flows, and an adequate working capital cycle. While TBL’s capital structure appears highly leveraged, risk is partly mitigated by its debt mix, with ~61% comprising a parent-funded project loan and the remainder short-term working capital facilities. Going forward, the Company is actively pursuing targeted cost-rationalization initiatives and adopting lean operational practices to further improve its profitability profile.

Key Rating Drivers

The ratings remain contingent upon TBL’s ability to sustain its top-line growth trajectory and enhance its market share within a competitive operating environment. Continued improvement in the profitability profile, coverage metrics, and leverage indicators is essential. Compliance with the shared financial projections will continue to be paramount.

Profile
Legal Structure

Treet Battery Limited (hereafter referred to as “TBL” or “the Company”) was incorporated on February 22, 2019, as an unlisted public limited company under the Companies Ordinance 1984 (now Companies Act, 2017), and was subsequently listed on the Pakistan Stock Exchange (PSX) on December 15th, 2023. The registered office of the Company and its holding company is situated at 72-B, Industrial Area, Kot Lakhpat, Lahore.


Background

Treet Battery Limited (TBL) represents the formal corporatization of the Treet Group’s battery division, which operates under the internationally recognized Daewoo brand license. Before its listing on the Pakistan Stock Exchange (PSX) in 2023, the battery business operated as a segment under First Treet Manufacturing Modaraba (FTMM). To streamline operations and unlock shareholder value, the battery undertaking, including all assets, liabilities, and operations, was demerged from FTMM and transferred to TBL, a new entity. This transition was executed under a formal Scheme of Arrangement, which received regulatory clearance and was sanctioned by the Honorable Lahore High Court. TBL is a key subsidiary of Treet Corporation Limited (TCL), a prominent and diversified conglomerate listed on the PSX. Since its independent listing, TBL has focused on scaling its production capabilities, specifically in the Maintenance-Free (MF) and Deep Cycle battery segments.


Operations

Treet Battery Limited is a specialized provider of advanced energy storage solutions, operating primarily under the Daewoo brand name. This licensing arrangement provides TBL with a significant competitive advantage, leveraging high consumer brand recall and a reputation for technological reliability within Pakistan’s automotive and renewable energy sectors. The Company’s operational model encompasses the entire value chain, including the manufacturing, assembly, and distribution of diverse battery technologies. Its portfolio is strategically diversified across lead-acid automotive and UPS backup requirements and expanding into advanced technologies like Lithium-Ion batteries, to capture the high-growth solar integration and industrial storage markets. The Company’s manufacturing facility is situated within the Faisalabad Industrial Estate Development and Management Company (FIEDMC) at Sahianwala Interchange. This location provides logistical advantages and access to industrial-grade infrastructure. The Company operates a high-precision and efficient Korean-engineered plant with a total installed capacity of 1.5 million units per annum in FY25 (FY24: 1.2 million). During FY25, the actual production volumes reached ~685k units (FY24: ~646k units), with an improved utilization of ~57% (FY24: ~53.9%). The facility also maintains ISO 9001 and ISO 14001 certifications.


Ownership
Ownership Structure

Treet Corporation Limited (TCL), the parent company, owns a majority stake of ~86.18%, and Treet Holdings Limited owns a stake of ~1.81%. The remaining shares are held by the general public (~10.88%) and others (~1.13%).


Stability

TBL’s ownership structure is considered stable, as the controlling stake is held by Treet Corporation Limited, a well-established entity with over seven decades of presence across multiple industries.


Business Acumen

Treet Corporation is a leading Pakistani conglomerate with a legacy spanning over 70 years. With decades of active engagement in multiple sectors, the parent company and its sponsoring family have consistently demonstrated strong business acumen. Their core strengths include a diversified business portfolio operating under the umbrella of several listed and public companies as subsidiaries or associated companies. The Group is dedicated to driving innovation and setting new benchmarks across various industries, including automotive, personal care, healthcare, packaging, and energy storage.


Financial Strength

TBL derives financial strength from its affiliation with the Treet Group, a prominent and highly diversified industrial conglomerate in Pakistan. Being part of the Treet Group provides TBL with significant competitive advantages, including brand equity, synergies, and financial support, when needed. As of June 2025, the Group’s consolidated asset base stood at PKR 33 billion, reflecting a robust financial footprint across FMCG, Engineering, Healthcare, and specialized manufacturing. The Group’s financial resilience is underpinned by its strategic investments and a sophisticated network of related parties and subsidiaries.


Governance
Board Structure

The Company’s board is overseen by eight members: five non-executive directors (including the chairman), two independent directors, and one executive director who also serves as the CEO. This diverse composition ensures compliance with the corporate governance code.


Members’ Profile

All members of the Board of Directors (BoD) are seasoned professionals with extensive industry experience and long-standing affiliations with the company. The Chairman, Syed Shahid Ali (Non-Executive Director), is a seasoned executive with broad management experience and serves on the boards of Packages Limited, IGI Insurance Limited, and Treet Corporation Limited. He has driven organizational growth through strong leadership and remains active in social initiatives. The Board also includes independent directors, Dr. Haroon Latif Khan and Mr. Ahmed Shahid Hussain, who leverage their expertise and strategic insights to contribute to the company’s growth. Among the non-executive directors, Mr. Imran Azim brings over 40 years of experience across financial, asset management, and manufacturing sectors. He serves on multiple boards, including Treet Corporation Limited, Habib Asset Management Limited, Treet Holdings Limited, First Treet Manufacturing Modaraba, and Global Arts Limited. Mr. Muhammad Mohtashim Aftab has over 29 years of experience in financial strategy, business partnering, and revenue growth, with a distinguished career at KAPCO and AF Ferguson & Co. (PwC). He also contributes strategically to Renacon Pharma, Loads Limited, and Hi-Tech Alloy Wheels. Ms. Zunaira Dar brings over 10 years of legal and corporate governance experience and serves as Group Head Legal and Company Secretary at Treet Corporation Limited. She holds an LLB (Hons) from the University of London and has previously worked with Irfan & Irfan, Panasian Group, and AkzoNobel. Mr. Mohammad Majid Munir is an expert in investment banking, M&A, private equity, and corporate strategy. He holds an MBA in Finance from LUMS and a BSc in Finance and International Business from NYU Stern. His career includes roles at Credit Suisse, Arthur D. Little, and Bank Alfalah, and he currently serves as Senior Independent Director at EPL. Together, the Board’s diverse professional backgrounds and extensive expertise strengthen its governance and strategic decision-making.


Board Effectiveness

The board of TBL has established two key committees: the Audit Committee and the HR & Remuneration Committee. Each of these is chaired by an independent director, ensuring impartial oversight and robust governance. During the year, multiple board meetings were held. Attendance of board members in these meetings remained strong.


Financial Transparency

M/s Rahman Sarfaraz Rahim Iqbal Rafiq Chartered Accountants, which are classified in category ‘A’ by SBP with satisfactory QCR rating, are the external auditors of the Company. The firm has expressed an unqualified opinion on the financial statements for the year ended June, 2025.


Management
Organizational Structure

The Company has a clearly defined organizational structure, comprising functional and administrative departments, each with a multilayered hierarchy, and is led by a qualified department head. At present, all key positions within the organization are fully staffed.


Management Team

The management team comprises highly qualified professionals with extensive experience and long-standing associations with the Company. Syed Sheharyar Ali, the CEO, is a dynamic leader with a strong focus on the automotive sector. He began his career at Treet Corporation Limited in 2001, becoming one of its youngest directors. Holding a BBA in Sales and Marketing Operations from Saint Louis University, USA, he is known for his forward-thinking leadership and commitment to continuous improvement. Muhammad Rizwan Qaiser, the CFO, brings over 15 years of experience in financial strategy, business turnarounds, and operational efficiency across local and international markets. Formerly CFO at Descon Oxychem, he led a company turnaround and managed major transactions, including a USD 2 billion CPEC project and a PKR 70 billion financing deal. At Treet Battery, he focuses on working capital optimization, performance improvement, and long-term growth. He holds an MBA from LUMS and a Bachelor’s degree from IBA Karachi. Shoaib Zafar, COO, oversees manufacturing, quality, R&D, and commercial operations. With over 18 years of experience, including senior roles at Unilever, he drives operational transformation, improving plant reliability, output, and efficiency. He holds a Mechanical Engineering degree from UET Lahore and is a certified TPM instructor and continuous improvement leader. This leadership team is supported by a group of experienced professionals, ensuring strong governance and strategic direction.


Effectiveness

The Company has established clear reporting lines, supported by a Management Committee comprising all department chiefs and directors. The committee meets regularly, as needed, to review and discuss key operational and strategic matters, ensuring coordinated decision-making and effective execution across the organization.


MIS

TBL has implemented Oracle EBS R12, ensuring compliance with global standards for enterprise management systems. It is an integrated enterprise system supporting finance, supply chain, manufacturing, HR, and CRM. It provides real-time insights, streamlined workflows, and global compliance for efficient decision-making across the organization.


Control Environment

A detailed Management Information System (MIS), featuring key performance indicators, is submitted to the CEO on a monthly basis, including an income statement, segment-wise and region-wise breakdowns of revenue and profit, efficiency variance reports, as well as receivables, payables, and inventory aging reports, and an operational expenditure summary. Big 4 is the outsourced internal auditor of the Company. In addition to that, the Company has carved out a distinct presence in the market by being recognized as a premium brand, renowned for its unwavering reliability, and a cutting-edge manufacturing facility, which is ISO 9001 & 14001 certified.


Business Risk
Industry Dynamics

The global battery market, estimated at over ~USD 100bn in 2025, is undergoing a structural shift from traditional lead-acid (growing ~3%) toward faster-growing lithium-ion technologies, driven by electric vehicles, renewable energy integration, and energy storage expansion, creating a dual-speed dynamic between stable legacy segments and high-growth new chemistries. In Pakistan, the battery market is relatively smaller (~USD 1.2–1.3bn in 2025–26), still dominated by lead-acid, with lithium-ion emerging (~USD 400mn, ~14% CAGR). Within the automotive segment, lead-acid batteries continue to be the standard for Starting, Lighting, and Ignition (SLI) applications, supported by the large domestic internal combustion engine fleet and, even in EVs, by auxiliary battery requirements driven by cost advantages and a well-established recycling ecosystem. Within this segment, MF batteries are gaining traction over conventional flooded variants, driven by consumer preference for convenience, lower maintenance (no water topping), and reduced corrosion risks; early movers in MF technology have benefited from this shift. However, despite the superior lifecycle and efficiency offered by lithium-ion and MF technologies, broader adoption remains constrained by a significant upfront price premium and the prevalence of an informal ecosystem of unorganized technicians and recyclers, which continues to reinforce demand for lower-cost conventional alternatives.

The local market is broadly segmented into automotive (OEM and replacement), backup power (household UPS and industrial), and a growing solar-linked storage segment. Demand is anchored by (i) automotive growth and vehicle parc expansion sustaining OEM and aftermarket demand, (ii) persistent reliance on backup power due to grid instability across households and industries, and (iii) rising solar adoption amid high electricity tariffs, increasingly favoring lithium-ion for its superior lifecycle economics. The replacement segment remains the largest contributor, given the short 2 to 3-year life of lead-acid batteries, ensuring recurring demand. Recent macroeconomic stabilization, through easing inflation, improving interest rates, recovering auto sales, and softer global commodity prices, has supported demand normalization and improved affordability, particularly for lithium-ion. Going forward, the market is expected to evolve into a hybrid structure, where lead-acid retains dominance in cost-sensitive automotive and UPS segments due to entrenched recycling and distribution advantages, while lithium-ion gains traction in solar, commercial & industrial storage, and emerging applications such as consumer electronics and light mobility.


Relative Position

The domestic battery landscape is characterized by a concentrated group of established players. Within this framework, the Company has successfully carved out a meaningful niche by leveraging its first-mover advantage in MF and Deep-Cycle technologies. Based on management’s representation, the Company commands an estimated ~7% market share within the organized sector (excluding the motorbike segment). A critical pillar of TBL’s market positioning is its successful integration into the primary automotive supply chain. The Company has secured strategic partnerships with leading Automobile OEMs operating in Pakistan to supply its premium MF batteries as original equipment, supporting its market expansion and reinforcing its competitive positioning in the automotive sector.


Revenues

Following its demerger from FTMM in 2023, TBL underwent an aggressive expansion phase. The Company reported net sales of PKR 8,844mln in FY25, maintaining stability relative to FY24 (PKR 8,733mln) and marking a transformative ~333% increase from the FY23 base of PKR 2,041mln. The exponential growth between 2023 and 2025 primarily reflects a base effect following the successful transition of the battery undertaking into a standalone, listed corporate entity. The subsequent stabilization in FY25 indicates that the business has moved past its initial ramp-up phase and is now consolidating its market position. For the first half of FY26, the Company recorded sales of PKR 3,521mln, representing a ~20.4% year-on-year decline. This contraction is attributed to a cyclical dip in demand for backup power solutions (UPS and Solar) during the winter months. Notably, the battery industry remains highly sensitive to weather patterns and the reliability of the national grid, leading to periodic fluctuations in replacement cycles.


Margins

TBL has demonstrated a notable recovery in its core profitability. After a transitional FY24, the Company’s gross margin stabilized at ~20% in FY25 (FY24: ~19.8%), supported by improved raw material procurement, better capacity utilization, and solarization initiatives. This recovery is more pronounced at the operating margin level, which improved to ~11% in FY25 (FY24: ~9.8%), reflecting enhanced control over administrative and selling expenses. A key highlight of FY25 is the return to a positive bottom line, with a net profit margin of ~0.5%, a significant reversal from the ~4.3% net loss in FY24. The upward trajectory gained momentum in 1HFY26, driven by strategic cost-effectiveness, optimized lead sourcing, and reduced finance cost. Gross margin improved further to ~22.2%, operating margin stood at ~8.2%, and net profit margin was maintained at ~0.6% in 1HFY26..


Sustainability

TBL’s sustainability is underpinned by its continued focus on premium product offerings and its strategic alignment with Pakistan’s evolving energy landscape, particularly the shift toward solar and energy storage solutions. The Company’s positioning is further strengthened by the institutional backing of the Treet Group, which provides financial support, operational synergies, and strategic direction. Moreover, TBL’s investments in technological advancement, quality control, and partnerships with leading international players enhance its competitive resilience and support long-term scalability. Its integration into key OEM supply chains and exposure to high-growth segments, such as automotive and solar energy storage, further reinforces its sustainability profile by ensuring diversified and recurring demand streams. Recognizing the global and domestic shift toward advanced energy storage, TBL has recently entered into a strategic partnership with Highstar Digital Energy Technology (Guangdong) Co., Ltd., a premier Chinese manufacturer. This collaboration positions TBL to lead the import and domestic distribution of Lithium-Ion (Li-ion) battery solutions, significantly diversifying its existing portfolio of MF and Deep Cycle lead-acid batteries. TBL’s move into the Li-ion space is a proactive response to two critical market drivers: Net Metering Transitions and Rising Energy Costs. To ensure its long-term sustainability, the Company also establishes the targets through financial projections, meticulous budgeting plans, and proactive forecasting of procurement requirements. The assigned ratings also incorporate a forward-looking view of the Company’s growth trajectory. A primary credit driver is the projected expansion of the top-line and the gradual improvement in the profitability, as detailed in the shared financial projections.


Financial Risk
Working capital

During FY25, TBL maintained a disciplined approach to its operating cycle. The net working capital cycle saw a marginal improvement, shortening to ~53 days (FY24: ~55 days). This efficiency was primarily driven by a reduction in the gross working capital cycle, which improved to ~67 days (FY24: ~71 days). The Company’s receivables management is considered good, with the average collection period remaining stable and lean at ~17 days (FY24: ~18 days). In the first half of FY26, the working capital dynamics shifted significantly, with the net and gross cycles lengthening to ~73 days and ~94 days, respectively. This extension is a direct consequence of a spike in inventory days, which rose to ~66 days (FY25: ~49 days). This inventory build-up is a deliberate strategic move to prepare for the peak demand period for high-value backup power solutions (UPS and Solar), which traditionally accelerates in the second half of the financial year.


Coverages

The Company has demonstrated a gradual improvement in its ability to service financial obligations. The EBITDA-to-finance cost ratio progressed from 0.7x in FY23 to 1.0x in FY24 and 1.3x in FY25, with a further step-up to 1.9x in 1HFY26. However, this improvement is predominantly policy rate-driven, total finance cost declined from PKR 1,265mln in FY24 to PKR 921mln in FY25 and further to PKR 261mln in the six-month period ending Dec-25, reflecting the impact of monetary policy easing rather than a structural improvement in earnings. FCFO similarly stood at PKR 375mln in 1HFY26, implying annualized generation of ~PKR 750mln, materially below the PKR 1,042mln recorded in FY25, driven by significant working capital consumption of PKR 1,503mln during the period. The core coverage ratio improved to 0.9x in 1HFY26 from 0.4x in both FY25 and FY24, which indicates that free cash flows, even under a low-rate environment, do not fully cover total debt service obligations. The Debt Payback Ratio stood at 17.8x as of Dec-25. Sustained coverage improvement is contingent on continued monetary easing and normalization of working capital cycles, rather than any step-change in core profitability.


Capitalization

The Company’s capital structure remains leveraged, albeit on a gradual deleveraging path. The leverage ratio improved to ~73.9% as of Dec-25, compared to a peak of ~98.3% in FY24, primarily driven by the conversion of ~PKR 2,003mln of related-party debt into ordinary share capital during FY25, which strengthened headline equity metrics. Despite this improvement, absolute indebtedness increased to PKR 6,221 million as of Dec-25 from PKR 5,546 million at Jun-25, largely due to additional short-term borrowings to support working capital requirements. This indicates that while leverage ratios have improved, underlying debt levels have continued to rise. Related-party borrowings, amounting to PKR 3,822mln, constitute a significant ~61.4% of total debt. While such funding provides a degree of financial flexibility, it also introduces concentration and refinancing risk, particularly in the absence of clearly defined terms, maturities, and rollover arrangements. Short-term borrowings stand at PKR 2,399 million, representing ~38.6% of the total debt profile. Going forward, sustained deleveraging will hinge on consistent profitability, prudent working capital management, and a more structured approach toward managing and gradually rationalizing related-party exposures.


 
 

May-26

www.pacra.com


(PKR mln)


Dec-25
6M
Jun-25
12M
Jun-24
12M
Jun-23
12M
Management Audited Audited Audited
A. BALANCE SHEET
1. Non-Current Assets 6,339 6,355 6,424 6,628
2. Investments 0 0 0 0
3. Related Party Exposure 0 670 670 0
4. Current Assets 3,294 2,499 3,061 1,748
a. Inventories 1,546 1,004 1,390 1,141
b. Trade Receivables 635 454 392 451
5. Total Assets 9,633 9,524 10,156 8,377
6. Current Liabilities 1,177 1,804 2,301 1,051
a. Trade Payables 408 420 269 457
7. Borrowings 2,399 2,289 2,209 2,518
8. Related Party Exposure 3,822 3,257 5,513 4,288
9. Non-Current Liabilities 41 0 3 12
10. Net Assets 2,193 2,174 130 507
11. Shareholders' Equity 2,193 2,174 130 507
B. INCOME STATEMENT
1. Sales 3,521 8,844 8,733 2,041
a. Cost of Good Sold (2,741) (7,078) (7,003) (1,556)
2. Gross Profit 781 1,765 1,730 485
a. Operating Expenses (493) (796) (873) (169)
3. Operating Profit 287 969 857 316
a. Non Operating Income or (Expense) 42 112 140 59
4. Profit or (Loss) before Interest and Tax 330 1,081 998 375
a. Total Finance Cost (261) (921) (1,265) (301)
b. Taxation (49) (120) (109) (16)
6. Net Income Or (Loss) 19 40 (377) 58
C. CASH FLOW STATEMENT
a. Free Cash Flows from Operations (FCFO) 375 1,042 1,179 219
b. Net Cash from Operating Activities before Working Capital Changes 116 600 634 108
c. Changes in Working Capital (1,503) 820 (1,471) (358)
1. Net Cash provided by Operating Activities (1,387) 1,420 (838) (249)
2. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Investing Activities 856 (137) (77) (16)
3. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Financing Activities 672 (689) 207 289
4. Net Cash generated or (Used) during the period 142 594 (708) 24
D. RATIO ANALYSIS
1. Performance
a. Sales Growth (for the period) -20.4% 1.3% 328.0% N/A
b. Gross Profit Margin 22.2% 20.0% 19.8% 23.7%
c. Net Profit Margin 0.6% 0.5% -4.3% 2.8%
d. Cash Conversion Efficiency (FCFO adjusted for Working Capital/Sales) -32.0% 21.1% -3.3% -6.8%
e. Return on Equity [ Net Profit Margin * Asset Turnover * (Total Assets/Shareholders' Equity )] 1.8% 3.5% -118.3% N/A
2. Working Capital Management
a. Gross Working Capital (Average Days) 94 67 71 N/A
b. Net Working Capital (Average Days) 73 53 55 N/A
c. Current Ratio (Current Assets / Current Liabilities) 2.8 1.4 1.3 1.7
3. Coverages
a. EBITDA / Finance Cost 1.9 1.3 1.0 0.7
b. FCFO / Finance Cost+CMLTB+Excess STB 0.9 0.4 0.4 0.1
c. Debt Payback (Total Borrowings+Excess STB) / (FCFO-Finance Cost) 17.8 38.9 -84.3 -74.5
4. Capital Structure
a. Total Borrowings / (Total Borrowings+Shareholders' Equity) 73.9% 71.8% 98.3% 93.1%
b. Interest or Markup Payable (Days) 75.1 41.7 39.2 145.2
c. Entity Average Borrowing Rate 7.7% 12.5% 16.9% N/A

May-26

www.pacra.com

May-26

www.pacra.com

  1. Rating Team Statements
    1. Rating is just an opinion about the creditworthiness of the entity and does not constitute a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell any security of the entity rated or to buy, hold, or sell the security rated, as the case may be. (Chapter III; 14-3-(x))
    2. Conflict of Interest
      1. The Rating Team or any of their family members have no interest in this rating (Chapter III; 12-2-(j))
      2. PACRA, the analysts involved in the rating process, and members of its rating committee and their family members do not have any conflict of interest relating to the rating done by them (Chapter III; 12-2-(e) & (k))
      3. The analyst is not a substantial shareholder of the customer being rated by PACRA [Annexure F; d-(ii)]
      4. Explanation: for the purpose of the above clause, the term "family members" shall include only those family members who are dependent on the analyst and members of the rating committee.
  2. Restrictions
    1. No director, officer, or employee of PACRA communicates the information acquired by him for use for rating purposes to any other person, except where required under law to do so. (Chapter III; 10-(5))
    2. PACRA does not disclose or discuss with outside parties or make improper use of the non-public information which has come to its knowledge during a business relationship with the customer. (Chapter III; 10-7-(d))
    3. PACRA does not make proposals or recommendations regarding the activities of rated entities that could impact a credit rating of the entity subject to rating. (Chapter III; 10-7-(k))
  3. Conduct of Business
    1. PACRA fulfills its obligations in a fair, efficient, transparent, and ethical manner and renders high standards of services in performing its functions and obligations. (Chapter III; 11-A-(a))
    2. PACRA uses due care in the preparation of this Rating Report. Our information has been obtained from sources we consider to be reliable, but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. PACRA does not, in every instance, independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing this Rating Report. (Clause 11-(A)(p))
    3. PACRA prohibits its employees and analysts from soliciting money, gifts, or favors from anyone with whom PACRA conducts business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(q))
    4. PACRA ensures before the commencement of the rating process that an analyst or employee has not had a recent employment or other significant business or personal relationship with the rated entity that may cause or may be perceived as causing a conflict of interest. (Chapter III; 11-A-(r))
    5. PACRA maintains the principle of integrity in seeking rating business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(u))
    6. PACRA promptly investigates in the event of misconduct or a breach of the policies, procedures, and controls, and takes appropriate steps to rectify any weaknesses to prevent any recurrence, along with suitable punitive action against the responsible employee(s). (Chapter III; 11-B-(m))
  4. Independence & Conflict of Interest
    1. PACRA receives compensation from the entity being rated or any third party for the rating services it offers. The receipt of this compensation has no influence on PACRA’s opinions or other analytical processes. In all instances, PACRA is committed to preserving the objectivity, integrity, and independence of its ratings. Our relationship is governed by two distinct mandates: i) rating mandate - signed with the entity being rated or issuer of the debt instrument, and ii) fee mandate - signed with the payer, which can be different from the entity.
    2. PACRA does not provide consultancy/advisory services or other services to any of its customers or their associated companies and associated undertakings that are being rated or have been rated by it during the preceding three years, unless it has an adequate mechanism in place ensuring that the provision of such services does not lead to a conflict of interest situation with its rating activities. (Chapter III; 12-2-(d))
    3. PACRA discloses that no shareholder directly or indirectly holding 10% or more of the share capital of PACRA also holds directly or indirectly 10% or more of the share capital of the entity which is subject to rating or the entity which issued the instrument subject to rating by PACRA. (Chapter III; 12-2-(f))
    4. PACRA ensures that the rating assigned to an entity or instrument is not affected by the existence of a business relationship between PACRA and the entity or any other party, or the non-existence of such a relationship. (Chapter III; 12-2-(i))
    5. PACRA ensures that the analysts or any of their family members shall not buy, sell, or engage in any transaction in any security which falls in the analyst’s area of primary analytical responsibility. This clause, however, does not apply to investments in securities through collective investment schemes. (Chapter III; 12-2-(l))
    6. PACRA has established policies and procedures governing investments and trading in securities by its employees and for monitoring the same to prevent insider trading, market manipulation, or any other market abuse. (Chapter III; 11-B-(g))
  5. Monitoring and Review
    1. PACRA monitors all the outstanding ratings continuously, and any potential change therein due to any event associated with the issuer, the security arrangement, the industry, etc., is disseminated to the market immediately and in an effective manner after appropriate consultation with the entity/issuer. (Chapter III; 17-(a))
    2. PACRA reviews all the outstanding ratings periodically on an annual basis. Provided that public dissemination of annual review and in an instance of change in rating will be made. (Chapter III; 17-(b))
    3. PACRA initiates an immediate review of the outstanding rating upon becoming aware of any information that may reasonably be expected to result in downgrading of the rating. (Chapter III; 17-(c))
    4. PACRA engages with the issuer and the debt securities trustee to remain updated on all information pertaining to the rating of the entity/instrument. (Chapter III; 17-(d))
  6. Probability of Default
    1. PACRA’s Rating Scale reflects the expectation of credit risk. The highest rating has the lowest relative likelihood of default (i.e., probability). PACRA’s transition studies capture the historical performance behavior of a specific rating notch. Transition behavior of the assigned rating can be obtained from PACRA’s Transition Study available at our website. (www.pacra.com) However, the actual transition of rating may not follow the pattern observed in the past. (Chapter III; 14-3(f)(vii))
  7. Proprietary Information
    1. All information contained herein is considered proprietary by PACRA. Hence, none of the information in this document can be copied or otherwise reproduced, stored, or disseminated in whole or in part in any form or by any means whatsoever by any person without PACRA’s prior written consent.

May-26

www.pacra.com