Rating History
Dissemination Date Long-Term Rating Short-Term Rating Outlook Action Rating Watch
26-Nov-25 A A1 Stable Maintain -
06-Dec-24 A A1 Stable Maintain -
07-Dec-23 A A1 Stable Initial -
About the Entity

Starch Pack (Pvt.) Limited ('Starch Pack' or the 'Company') was incorporated as a private limited company in Jun-21. The Company manufactures and sells corn-based starch products, derivatives, and by-products. Starch Pack is a wholly owned subsidiary of Packages Limited. Its manufacturing plant is located in Kasur, Punjab. Mr. Imran Khalid Niazi chairs the Board, while Mr. Fazeel Ur Rehman heads the Company as the CEO. They are assisted by an experienced management team.

Rating Rationale

The assigned ratings to Starch Pack (Pvt.) Limited ('Starch Pack' or the 'Company') gathers support from its association with Packages Group (the Group), which holds a strong footing across the packaging value chain through Packages Limited and the financial sector through IGI Holdings. Starch Pack is principally involved in the manufacturing and selling of corn-based native/modified starches and derivatives (e.g., Glucose and unrefined Corn Oil). The Company was set up as part of the Group's backward integration vision for Bulleh Shah Packaging (Pvt.) Limited, which manufactures and sells paper, board, and corrugated boxes in Pakistan. This strategic initiative was aimed at creating Group synergies within the packaging value chain. The Company projects to benefit from Pakistan's highly localized corn sector, which holds significant growth opportunities in the value-added segment across both local and international markets. Both native and modified starch variants are considered to be vital inputs for the textile, paper, and packaging sectors. Despite stability in the internal demand from Bulleh Shah Packaging, the Company requires time to overcome the initial operational challenges. The Company's topline has posted growth; however, inflated cost structures have led to persistent losses at the gross and net levels. Developing a cautious strategy to capitalize on the plant's strategic location and achieving economies of scale remains pertinent for the Company. Crucially, the Group's international presence provides an established global footprint for Starch Pack's products. The immediate focus on enhancing local sales, followed by increasing exports of value-added products, remains essential to achieve an operational breakeven. On the financial risk front, the working capital cycle is adequate, while coverages are weak. Moreover, continuous financial support from the Group, which includes an equity injection of ~PKR 3bln as of Dec-24, the latest equity injection of ~PKR 1.4bln as of Oct-25, and another projected equity injection of ~PKR 2bln in 2026 to cover the consistent losses, remains pivotal in sustaining the assigned ratings. This, along with strong sponsor acumen, and a developed governance framework remains paramount. The Company's current lean structure, supported by a well-equipped and experienced management team, bodes well. Moreover, a sound control environment adds the requisite respite.

Key Rating Drivers

The ratings are dependent on continued Group synergies. This, along with the timely and successful materialization of projected initiatives (local and/or international), while keeping the business margins in control, remains critical to the assigned rating. Moreover, enhancing market reach, along with managing the efficiency in the working capital cycle, is crucial.

Profile
Legal Structure

Starch Pack (Pvt.) Limited (‘Starch Pack’ or ‘the Company’) was incorporated as a private limited company in Jun-21 under the repealed Companies Ordinance, 1984 (now called the Companies Act, 2017).


Background

Starch Pack is a recent venture of Packages Group (the 'Group') that holds considerable footing across the packaging value chain through Packages Limited and the financial sector through IGI Holdings. The Company is set up as a part of a backward integration vision of the packaging value chain to create synergies across the Group.


Operations

Starch Pack manufactures and sells corn-based native and modified starches and their derivatives and by-products, such as Glucose and Corn Oil. The grinding capacity of the plant is 250 tons per day. The Company reported the production capacity of its wet milling plant at ~85,000 MT, native starch dryer plant at ~30,600 MT, modified dry starch plant at ~ 8500 MT, and glucose refinery at ~ 20,400 MT. The Company's manufacturing plant is in Kasur, Punjab, while the head office is in Lahore.


Ownership
Ownership Structure

Starch Pack is a wholly owned subsidiary of Packages Limited.


Stability

The Company's ownership structure is expected to remain stable as the Group is among the largest and well-established investment holdings in Pakistan.


Business Acumen

The Sponsors hold a strong acumen in managing interests in paper and paperboard, packaging, financial institutions, education, and real estate sectors. A strong affiliation with international associations suits the Group's investment structure.


Financial Strength

Requisite oversight and financial support from the Group ensure the Company's financial strength. The Group's consolidated assets stand at ~PKR 274bln as of 9MCY25 with an equity base of ~PKR 88bln.


Governance
Board Structure

Overall control of the Company vests with a nine-member Board (BoD) comprising three Executive Directors, three Non-Executive Directors, and three Independent Directors. The BoD has six nominee Directors from Packages Limited and substantial independence in decision-making.


Members’ Profile

The BoD, with a well-diversified background and relative expertise of its members, is a key source of oversight and guidance for the management. The Chairman, Mr. Imran Khalid Niazi, has been associated with the BoD since 16-Jan-23. He is a seasoned professional with technical expertise gained from multinationals. Other BoD members also carry diversified experience, thus strengthening the BoD's policy formation process.


Board Effectiveness

The BoD met twice during the last quarters, with the majority attending, to discuss pertinent matters. While the minutes of the meetings are documented, there is room for improvement concerning the details and clarity of the minutes. To ensure effective governance, three committees assist the BoD, namely i) Audit Committee, ii) Human Resource and Remuneration Committee, and iii) IT Steering Committee. The Audit Committee meet on quarterly basis, while the HR & Remuneration and the IT Steering Committee's meet once a year.


Financial Transparency

Starch Pack has appointed M/s A.F. Ferguson & Co. as the Company's external auditor. The auditor has expressed an unqualified opinion on the financial reports of CY24.


Management
Organizational Structure

The Company operates through i) EHS, ii) Administration and Security, iii) Supply chain, iv) Sales and Marketing, v) Human Resources, and vi) IT. All department Heads report to the respective Group Head, who reports to the CEO. The CEO reports to the BoD. The organizational structure is well-defined, with clear lines of responsibility. The dual reporting framework allows for an enhanced oversight framework.


Management Team

Mr. Fazeel Ur Rehman heads the Company as the CEO. He has been associated with the Group for over two decades and has served as the CEO of OmyaPack. Mr. Ali Wajid, the CFO, has been associated with the Group for over a decade and has worked in many key positions in various Group companies. The management team comprises seasoned professionals, each bringing expertise in their respective fields.


Effectiveness

The Sponsors' experience, along with a professional management team, helps the Company streamline its operations. However, anticipating the need for enhanced management efficacy, there are envisaged plans to add management-level committees in the future.


MIS

A web-based real-time ERP solution is required to generate comprehensive MIS reports covering the operations of all segments within the Company. Starch Pack has been using SAP (ERP ECC6) and its implementation partner has been Excellence Delivered (ExD). The Company has receintly transitioned to SAP S4/HANA as its primary ERP software. The Company gets ERP support from Excellence Delivered Pakistan Limited in line with the Packages Group synergy.


Control Environment

To ensure operational efficiency, the Group has a centralized internal audit function that reports to the BoDs Audit Committee. The Company has set up effective mechanisms for identifying, assessing, and reporting all types of risks arising from the business operations. These risks include strategic, operational, financial, or compliance risks, which may compromise achieving the Group's overall business objectives.


Business Risk
Industry Dynamics

The food and textile industries are fast-paced. The Company’s success depends on understanding customer requirements, anticipating future trends, challenges, and opportunities, and partnering with suppliers and human capital to discover long-term and sustainable solutions for all our stakeholders. The high ination and political uncertainties impacted food ingredient demand, consumption demands, and customer base in the previous year.


Relative Position

The Company is in the early stage of its life cycle and facing entity-related challenges leading to operational losses while other competitors are already established. Sales primarily trickle from the Group companies only, followed by a subsequent market expansion. Thus, the Company's relative position is currently evolving.


Revenues

The Company primarily generates revenue by manufacturing and selling starch variants. Out of these, Native Starch contributes ~40% of total revenue, amounting to ~PKR 2,277mln. Corn-based by-products were the second-largest contributor, making up ~20% of total revenue (~PKR 1,161mln) during 9MCY25. Oxidized Starch, Cationic Starch, and Glucose contributed ~12%, ~11%, and ~16% of revenue, respectively. During 9MCY25, the Company reported revenue of ~PKR 5,698mln, reflecting a ~140% increase compared to SPLY (9MCY24: ~PKR 2,365mln). Starch Pack maintains a well-diversified product base, hedging itself against the risk of a revenue decline in any single stream. However, going forward, the Company needs to develope a cautious strategy to manage consistency in the topline growth.


Margins

In 9MCY25, the Company posted a gross loss of ~PKR (3)mln, compared to a gross loss of ~PKR (143)mln in SPLY. However, the Company’s gross losses has reduced by ~97%, reflecting improved cost absorption resulting from a ~140% increase in sales during the period. While, the operating losses for the Company during 9MCY25 stood at ~PKR (424)mln, compared to ~PKR (377)mln in SPLY, reflected an increase of ~12%. This was mainly due to increased selling and admin expenses. At the net level, the Company booked a loss of ~PKR (1,059)mln in 9MCY25 compared to ~PKR (1,066)mln in SPLY. The Company is currently facing initial gestation operational and competitive challenges. Going forward, the Company projects to become a profitable venture by the end of 2026, both at gross and net level. Keeping economic viability under concer, adherence to the same remains pertinent. 


Sustainability

The Group has a well-established mark in the packaging segment. Starch Pack is striving to strengthen its footprint along with a capacity expansion that streamlines the utilization levels and conversion costs. The Company must instill flexible plans to overcome the current challenges. Moreover, continuous financial support from the Group, which includes an equity injection of ~PKR 3bln as of Dec-24, the latest equity injection of ~PKR 1.4bln as of Oct-25, and another projected equity injection of ~PKR 2bln in 2026 to cover the consistent losses, remains pivotal in sustaining the assigned ratings.


Financial Risk
Working capital

Starch Pack’s working capital requirements are a function of its inventory, trade receivables, and trade payables financed through short-term borrowings. The Company is managing its receivables on cash with a minimal inventory holding period. The Company's credit term falls within 30 days. Payment discipline is required. The acquisition of raw materials (corn grains) will be divided into 10-12 months cycles (12 months total). Except for raw material (corn), payables are cleared within 30 to 45 days. In 9MCY25, the Company’s net working capital cycle stood at 119 days, compared to 79 days in 9MCY24. The primary factor contributing to this decline was the increase in days to receive sales, which rose sharply from 1 day in 9MCY24 to 48 days in 9MCY25, while days to inventory and payables remained largely unchanged. The Company holds a stressed  borrowing cushion on its balance sheet. As the Company grows out from its initial gestation phase, working capital related challenges are expected to be streamlined.


Coverages

In 9MCY25, the Company’s interest coverage ratio stood at (2.0)x, compared to (0.1)x in SPLY, primarily due to FCFO which deteriorated sharply to PKR (1,961)mln in 9MCY25, from PKR (74)mln in 9MCY24. This is mainly due to persistent losses on the net level. Going forward, coverage improvements are essential for increasing overall efficiency. 


Capitalization

The Company’s equity declined from ~PKR 1,246mln in 9MCY24 to ~PKR 271mln in 9MCY25. Share-capital of the Company remained stable at ~PKR 3,900mln during 9MCY25 compared to SPLY. This gathered support from an equity injection of ~PKR 3bln in Dec-24 by the parent company. The erosion of equity was primarily driven by an increase in accumulated losses [9MCY25: ~PKR 3,629mln, 9MCY24: ~PKR 1,904mln ]. Equity levels are expected to stabilize in response to the conversion of ~PKR 1bln worth of debt into equity and a recent equity injection amounting to ~PKR 1.4bln. Leverage for the Company stands at ~98% in 9MCY25 from ~86% in 9MCY24 resulting from increase (~36%) in borrowings [9MCY25: ~PKR 10,713mln , 9MCY24 : ~PKR 7,854mln]. This uptake in borrowing is driven by a ~17% increase in long-term borrowings [9MCY25: ~PKR 6,163mln, 9MCY24 ~PKR 5,267mln] and a ~47% increase in short-term borrowings [9MCY25: ~PKR 3,446mln, 9MCY24 ~PKR 2,351mln]. These were obtained to manage the CAPEX and working capital requirement of the Company, respectively. Going forward, profit generation remains crucial to prevent further equity erosion. Moreover, continuous financial support from the parent company, which includes another projected equity injection of ~PKR 2bln in 2026 to cover the consistent losses, remains important.


 
 

Nov-25

www.pacra.com


Sep-25
9M
Dec-24
12M
Dec-23
12M
Dec-22
12M
A. BALANCE SHEET
1. Non-Current Assets 7,968 7,824 6,930 3,663
2. Investments 0 0 0 322
3. Related Party Exposure 3 10 58 12
4. Current Assets 5,403 4,774 2,210 849
a. Inventories 2,757 1,786 1,146 191
b. Trade Receivables 1,607 399 12 0
5. Total Assets 13,374 12,609 9,198 4,846
6. Current Liabilities 2,294 1,030 696 145
a. Trade Payables 1,207 373 185 66
7. Borrowings 10,713 9,894 5,642 1,641
8. Related Party Exposure 57 18 85 184
9. Non-Current Liabilities 39 27 345 0
10. Net Assets 271 1,639 2,430 2,876
11. Shareholders' Equity 271 1,639 2,431 2,877
B. INCOME STATEMENT
1. Sales 5,698 3,599 52 0
a. Cost of Good Sold (5,701) (3,896) (225) 0
2. Gross Profit (3) (297) (172) 0
a. Operating Expenses (421) (373) (46) (28)
3. Operating Profit (424) (670) (218) (28)
a. Non Operating Income or (Expense) 5 15 10 37
4. Profit or (Loss) before Interest and Tax (419) (655) (208) 8
a. Total Finance Cost (934) (1,278) 88 (13)
b. Taxation 293 483 80 0
6. Net Income Or (Loss) (1,059) (1,450) (40) (5)
C. CASH FLOW STATEMENT
a. Free Cash Flows from Operations (FCFO) (1,961) (520) (216) (43)
b. Net Cash from Operating Activities before Working Capital Changes (2,952) (2,025) (538) (43)
c. Changes in Working Capital (3) (623) (1,319) (535)
1. Net Cash provided by Operating Activities (2,955) (2,647) (1,857) (578)
2. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Investing Activities (357) (827) (2,729) (3,278)
3. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Financing Activities 1,612 4,209 3,596 3,014
4. Net Cash generated or (Used) during the period (1,699) 735 (989) (843)
D. RATIO ANALYSIS
1. Performance
a. Sales Growth (for the period) 111.1% 6763.9% N/A N/A
b. Gross Profit Margin -0.0% -8.3% -328.2% N/A
c. Net Profit Margin -18.6% -40.3% -75.9% N/A
d. Cash Conversion Efficiency (FCFO adjusted for Working Capital/Sales) -34.5% -31.8% -2927.4% N/A
e. Return on Equity [ Net Profit Margin * Asset Turnover * (Total Assets/Shareholders' Equity )] -147.9% -71.2% 7.7% -0.7%
2. Working Capital Management
a. Gross Working Capital (Average Days) 157 170 8494 N/A
b. Net Working Capital (Average Days) 119 141 7621 N/A
c. Current Ratio (Current Assets / Current Liabilities) 2.4 4.6 3.2 5.9
3. Coverages
a. EBITDA / Finance Cost -1.9 -0.3 2.0 0.9
b. FCFO / Finance Cost+CMLTB+Excess STB -1.0 -0.3 2.5 -3.2
c. Debt Payback (Total Borrowings+Excess STB) / (FCFO-Finance Cost) -2.0 -3.5 -39.2 -29.2
4. Capital Structure
a. Total Borrowings / (Total Borrowings+Shareholders' Equity) 97.5% 85.8% 69.9% 36.3%
b. Interest or Markup Payable (Days) 106.8 121.1 -1872.7 1939.7
c. Entity Average Borrowing Rate 12.6% 17.1% -2.8% 0.8%

Nov-25

www.pacra.com

Nov-25

www.pacra.com

  1. Rating Team Statements
    1. Rating is just an opinion about the creditworthiness of the entity and does not constitute a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell any security of the entity rated or to buy, hold, or sell the security rated, as the case may be. (Chapter III; 14-3-(x))
    2. Conflict of Interest
      1. The Rating Team or any of their family members have no interest in this rating (Chapter III; 12-2-(j))
      2. PACRA, the analysts involved in the rating process, and members of its rating committee and their family members do not have any conflict of interest relating to the rating done by them (Chapter III; 12-2-(e) & (k))
      3. The analyst is not a substantial shareholder of the customer being rated by PACRA [Annexure F; d-(ii)]
      4. Explanation: for the purpose of the above clause, the term "family members" shall include only those family members who are dependent on the analyst and members of the rating committee.
  2. Restrictions
    1. No director, officer, or employee of PACRA communicates the information acquired by him for use for rating purposes to any other person, except where required under law to do so. (Chapter III; 10-(5))
    2. PACRA does not disclose or discuss with outside parties or make improper use of the non-public information which has come to its knowledge during a business relationship with the customer. (Chapter III; 10-7-(d))
    3. PACRA does not make proposals or recommendations regarding the activities of rated entities that could impact a credit rating of the entity subject to rating. (Chapter III; 10-7-(k))
  3. Conduct of Business
    1. PACRA fulfills its obligations in a fair, efficient, transparent, and ethical manner and renders high standards of services in performing its functions and obligations. (Chapter III; 11-A-(a))
    2. PACRA uses due care in the preparation of this Rating Report. Our information has been obtained from sources we consider to be reliable, but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. PACRA does not, in every instance, independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing this Rating Report. (Clause 11-(A)(p))
    3. PACRA prohibits its employees and analysts from soliciting money, gifts, or favors from anyone with whom PACRA conducts business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(q))
    4. PACRA ensures before the commencement of the rating process that an analyst or employee has not had a recent employment or other significant business or personal relationship with the rated entity that may cause or may be perceived as causing a conflict of interest. (Chapter III; 11-A-(r))
    5. PACRA maintains the principle of integrity in seeking rating business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(u))
    6. PACRA promptly investigates in the event of misconduct or a breach of the policies, procedures, and controls, and takes appropriate steps to rectify any weaknesses to prevent any recurrence, along with suitable punitive action against the responsible employee(s). (Chapter III; 11-B-(m))
  4. Independence & Conflict of Interest
    1. PACRA receives compensation from the entity being rated or any third party for the rating services it offers. The receipt of this compensation has no influence on PACRA’s opinions or other analytical processes. In all instances, PACRA is committed to preserving the objectivity, integrity, and independence of its ratings. Our relationship is governed by two distinct mandates: i) rating mandate - signed with the entity being rated or issuer of the debt instrument, and ii) fee mandate - signed with the payer, which can be different from the entity.
    2. PACRA does not provide consultancy/advisory services or other services to any of its customers or their associated companies and associated undertakings that are being rated or have been rated by it during the preceding three years, unless it has an adequate mechanism in place ensuring that the provision of such services does not lead to a conflict of interest situation with its rating activities. (Chapter III; 12-2-(d))
    3. PACRA discloses that no shareholder directly or indirectly holding 10% or more of the share capital of PACRA also holds directly or indirectly 10% or more of the share capital of the entity which is subject to rating or the entity which issued the instrument subject to rating by PACRA. (Chapter III; 12-2-(f))
    4. PACRA ensures that the rating assigned to an entity or instrument is not affected by the existence of a business relationship between PACRA and the entity or any other party, or the non-existence of such a relationship. (Chapter III; 12-2-(i))
    5. PACRA ensures that the analysts or any of their family members shall not buy, sell, or engage in any transaction in any security which falls in the analyst’s area of primary analytical responsibility. This clause, however, does not apply to investments in securities through collective investment schemes. (Chapter III; 12-2-(l))
    6. PACRA has established policies and procedures governing investments and trading in securities by its employees and for monitoring the same to prevent insider trading, market manipulation, or any other market abuse. (Chapter III; 11-B-(g))
  5. Monitoring and Review
    1. PACRA monitors all the outstanding ratings continuously, and any potential change therein due to any event associated with the issuer, the security arrangement, the industry, etc., is disseminated to the market immediately and in an effective manner after appropriate consultation with the entity/issuer. (Chapter III; 17-(a))
    2. PACRA reviews all the outstanding ratings periodically on an annual basis. Provided that public dissemination of annual review and in an instance of change in rating will be made. (Chapter III; 17-(b))
    3. PACRA initiates an immediate review of the outstanding rating upon becoming aware of any information that may reasonably be expected to result in downgrading of the rating. (Chapter III; 17-(c))
    4. PACRA engages with the issuer and the debt securities trustee to remain updated on all information pertaining to the rating of the entity/instrument. (Chapter III; 17-(d))
  6. Probability of Default
    1. PACRA’s Rating Scale reflects the expectation of credit risk. The highest rating has the lowest relative likelihood of default (i.e., probability). PACRA’s transition studies capture the historical performance behavior of a specific rating notch. Transition behavior of the assigned rating can be obtained from PACRA’s Transition Study available at our website. (www.pacra.com) However, the actual transition of rating may not follow the pattern observed in the past. (Chapter III; 14-3(f)(vii))
  7. Proprietary Information
    1. All information contained herein is considered proprietary by PACRA. Hence, none of the information in this document can be copied or otherwise reproduced, stored, or disseminated in whole or in part in any form or by any means whatsoever by any person without PACRA’s prior written consent.

Nov-25

www.pacra.com