Rating History
Dissemination Date IFS Rating Outlook Action Rating Watch
23-Oct-25 AA++ (ifs) Stable Maintain -
01-Nov-24 AA++ (ifs) Stable Maintain -
03-Nov-23 AA++ (ifs) Stable Maintain -
03-Nov-22 AA++ (ifs) Stable Maintain -
31-Mar-22 AA++ (ifs) Stable Harmonize -
About the Entity

Jubilee General Insurance Company Limited ("Jubilee General" or "the Company") was incorporated in May-53 as a publicly listed company. Principal activity involves managing non-life insurance through conventional and window Takaful operations in Fire and Property, Marine and Aviation, Accident and Health, and Motor segments. A major stake of the Company lies with the Aga Khan Development Network and the Hashwani Group (~58.58%). The Company's Board is chaired by Mr. Akabarali Pesnani. Lately, Mr. Azfar Arshad has taken up the charge as the CEO. He has been associated with the Company for two decades. They are assisted by a team of experienced professionals.

Rating Rationale

Jubilee General Insurance Company Limited (‘Jubilee Insurance’ or ‘the Company’) holds a considerable standing in Pakistan's general insurance industry. The Company draws strength from Aga Khan Development Network (‘AKDN'), holding a strong presence in the financial industry, through Habib Bank Limited, Jubilee Life Insurance Company Limited, and Jubilee Insurance. A robust governance framework, well aligned with the managerial practices, supports the Company's overall operations; also, it bodes well for the IFS rating. The Company holds a robust business profile with Gross Premium Written (GPW) trickling in majorly (~88%) from conventional operations, with a support of ~12% from window Takaful operations. Within each line of operations, fire and property (~40%) remains the main GPW generating segment, followed by miscellaneous (~19%), accident & health (~15%), motor (~13%), and marine (~9%). GPW's growth of ~18% is mainly driven by conventional (~19%), followed by window Takaful (~17%) operations. This growth remains a factor of increase in the premium pricing, with a modest volume of new policies flowing in. The Company's bottom line remains strong, supported by stable underwriting performance (~PKR 944mln) and considerably strong investment returns (~PKR 4.4bln). The Company's investment strategy (portfolio size of ~PKR 33.3bln) remains inclined to secure avenues, i.e., government securities, along with a diverse mix of blue-chip equity securities. Going forward, the recovery of economic activities and improvements in both the micro and macroeconomic landscape are expected to positively impact the Company's overall performance. On the financial risk front, Jubilee Insurance is supported by substantial risk absorption capacity, underpinned by sufficient liquidity. Additionally, the Company has demonstrated financial stability through consistent dividend payments. Additionally, the presence of internationally recognized and highly rated reinsurers provides confidence in the Company's ability to repay its financial obligations, if any.

Key Rating Drivers

Sustainability of business segments and efficient expense management remain imperative to the financial performance. Moreover, the investment book's performance, which is directed towards high-growth avenues, is crucial for the rating. The rating remains dependent upon the Company's sustained market position and benefiting from the sound Group profile.

Profile
Legal Structure

Jubilee General Insurance Co. Ltd ("Jubilee Insurance" or "the Company") was incorporated as a public limited company in 1953, and became a listed concern in 1955 with a trade symbol of "JGICL" on PSX .



Background

In 1953, New Jubilee Insurance Co. Ltd. began operations with an initial focus on life and general insurance. In 1972, the life insurance business was segregated as per the nationalization orders. Over time, the Company expanded by acquiring Commercial General Union Insurance, and later became the pioneer in accident and health insurance. In 2011, it was renamed as Jubilee General Insurance Co. Ltd. Later, the Company acquired ~19.5% stake in Jubilee Kyrgyzstan Insurance Co. Ltd., and in 2015, the Company began window takaful operations. Today, it's one of the leading insurance companies in the country.


Operations

Jubilee Insurance manages conventional insurance along with a takaful window. Within both, it's mainly engaged in fire, marine, and aviation, motor, and accident/health segments through a network of 34 branches across Pakistan. The operations are managed by 4 zones (South, Lahore, Multan & North), and 2 commercial units.


Ownership
Ownership Structure

Jubilee General is majorly owned by the Aga Khan Development Network ("the Aga Group") and the Hashwani Group (~58.58%). Directors and their spouses hold (~2%). Remaining stake is held by general public (~26%) and others (~13%).


Stability

The sponsors possess an interest in a diversified field of the market and hold a prominent share. The Aga Group has ownership stakes in a number of commercial ventures as well. Similarly, the Hashwani Group possesses a diversified business portfolio, with key significance held by the Pearl-Continental and the Marriott Hotels chain. Considering to aforementioned, the ownership of the Company seems to remain stable.


Business Acumen

The sponsors have witnessed various business cycles over time. Both sponsors hold strong business acumen across diversified business portfolios, thus providing the ownership structure with a requisite support in the long term.


Financial Strength

The Company’s largest sponsor, the Aga Group, holds diversified business interests across various sectors of the country and maintains a strong presence in the domestic market. The second sponsor, the Hashwani Group, is recognized among the leading business conglomerates in Pakistan. Its operations span commodity trading, textiles, real estate, and mining, along with the processing and marketing of products such as Himalayan pink salt and a variety of minerals including onyx, marble, travertine, lead, chrome, barite, and iron ore. The Group also maintains a diversified international footprint, with business interests extending across South Asia, Europe, Africa, and the Middle East.


Governance
Board Structure

Overall control of the Company resides with a 10-member Board (BoD), comprising 6 Non-Executive, 3 Independent and 1 Executive Director. The BoD has an adequate presence of sponsors along with 3 female Director. This bodes well for policy formation and decision making at the BoD level. 


Members’ Profile

Mr. Akbar Ali Pesnani has been chairing the BoD since 2023 and has been associated with the Company since 2002. He holds more than 5 decades of professional experience. Ms. Nausheen Ahmad, an Independent Director, brings over 3 decades of legal expertise. Lately, Ms. Sima Kamil has been appointed as an Independent Director to fill the casual vacancy created by the resignation of Mr. Badruddin Fatehali Vellani as an Independe Director. Ms. Sima holds 35 years of overall experience in comercial banking. All other BoD members also carry diversified experience, thus strengthening the BoD's policy formation process.


Board Effectiveness

During CY24, the BoD has met six times, with adequate attendance. This ensures effective, transparent and independent oversight is maintained by five sub-committees: (i) Audit Committee, (ii) Finance & Investment Committee, (iii) Board Risk & Compliance Committee, (iv) Human Resource Remuneration and (v) Information Technology Steering Committee. These Committees met six times during CY24. Minutes of the BoD and Committee meetings are maintained adequately.


Transparency

External Auditors of the Company; M/S: KPMG Taseer Hadi & Co. (Chartered Accountants) has issued an unqualified audit report pertaining to the annual financial statements for CY24. The firm is QCR rated and in category 'A' of SBPs panel.


Management
Organizational Structure

The Company operates through eight departments - ERM, Compliance & QA, Investments, Operations, Marketing, HR, IT, Finance, and Admin. All departmental Heads report to the CEO, who then reports to the BoD. While the Head of Internal Audit, HR, IT, and Risk functionally reports to the respective BoD committee, and administratively to the CEO. 


Management Team

In Jan-25, Mr. Azfar Arshad took up the charge as the Company's CEO. Earlier, Mr. Hasan Khan was heading as the CEO. Mr. Azfar holds diversified professional experience of more than 3 decades, and has been associated with the Company for two decades. Previously, Mr. Azfar was working as Jubilee Life's Chief Operating Officer (COO). Mr. Syed Ali Adnan took up the charge as the Chief Financial Officer (CFO) of the Company in Apr-24. Mr. Ali holds an experience of more than 3 decades. Overall, the senior management comprises experienced personnels. 


Effectiveness

The management is facilitated by seven committees, (i) Underwriting Committee, (ii) Claims Settlement Committee, (iii) Re-insurance/Co-insurance Committee, (iv) Enterprise Risk Management Committee, (v) Takaful Committee, (vi) Executive Management Committee (MANCOM) and (vii) Assets Allocation Committee. All the Committees are headed by the CEO, and meet on quarterly basis. Minutes of each meeting are adequately documented.


MIS

A web-based real-time ERP solution is in place that generates comprehensive MIS reports covering the operations of all business segments within the Company. Information is periodically reviewed and validated through internal controls as well as annual external audits.


Claim Management System

A centralized claim management framework is in place, supported by documented risk registers and periodic reviews to ensure adequacy of reserves. The process involves active monitoring of Key Risk Indicators, with any tolerance breaches promptly reported along with corrective actions. The Committee oversees the claims to ensure adequate reserves. It gives attention to claims that may give rise to a series of claims, going forward, and determines the circumstances under which such claim disputes shall be brought to attention.


Investment Management Function

The BoD-approved Investment Policy sets out clear guidelines, limits, and benchmarks for managing exposures across key categories. Risk tolerances are defined at both board and management levels, ensuring discipline in decision-making and early escalation of breaches. Regular reviews by the management and the Board Risk and Compliance Committee help maintain alignment with capital capacity, regulatory requirements, and the Company’s long-term objectives.


Risk Management framework

The Company has established an enterprise-wide risk management framework anchored on clearly defined risk appetite statements and tolerance levels, ensuring that risk-taking remains aligned with strategic objectives. Risks are identified through structured protocols such as scenario workshops and external benchmarking, and are evaluated using a universal risk matrix that considers both likelihood and impact. Periodic reviews are carried out with the active involvement of risk owners, with outcomes escalated first to the Enterprise Risk Management Committee and subsequently to the Board Risk and Compliance Committee, thereby ensuring proactive oversight and governance.


Business Risk
Industry Dynamics

Pakistan's general insurance industry reached a total size of ~PKR 218bln in CY24 (CY23: ~PKR 188bln), marking ~17% growth in Gross Premium Written (GPW) from the previous year. The sector's financial performance showed significant improvement, with underwriting results surging by ~67% to PKR 12bln (CY23: ~PKR 7bln). This positive trend was complemented by a ~35% increase in overall investment income, which reached PKR 26bln (CY23: ~PKR 19bln). Going forward, the industry is expected to follow the same trajectory.


Relative Position

The Company is classified as third largest entity in the General Insurance sector with ~14.6% market share in terms of GPW.


Revenue

During CY24, the Company genrated buisness from both Conventional business 88% (~PKR 20.4bln), and Window Takaful business 12% (~PKR 2.6bln). Fire segment was the forte of the Company comprising ~40% of the total GPW, followed by Miscellaneous ~19%, Accident and Health (~15%), Motor (~13%), and Marine, Aviation & Transport (~9%). During CY24, the Company posted a surge of ~18% in consolidated Gross Premium Written (GPW) mainly due to increase in the premium pricing, with a modest volume of new policies flowing in. The GPW stood at ~PKR 23bln (CY23: ~PKR 19.5bln). During 6MCY25, the Company posted a surge of ~18.6% in consolidated Gross Premium Written (GPW). The GPW stood at ~PKR 14.4bln (6MCY24: ~PKR 13.4bln). Looking ahead, the Company's overall performance may improve due to stabilizing economic conditions.


Profitability

The underwriting performance of the Company increased by ~11% (CY24: ~PKR 944mln, CY23: ~PKR 851mln), attributed to higher GPW, increased management expense and stable net claims. Whereas, net profits of the Company were supported by healthy investment income (CY24: ~PKR 4.4bln, CY23: ~PKR 3.2mln). During CY24, consolidated profit after tax of the Company witnessed an increase of ~22% and stood at ~PKR 3.5bln (CY23: 2.9bln) supported by higher investment income. During 6MCY25, the underwriting performance of the Company improved by ~2% and stood at ~PKR 575mln (6MCY24: ~PKR 563mln), attributed to improvement in the net contribution backed by higher GPW. The net profits of the Company were supported by healthy investment income (6MCY25: ~PKR 3.6bln, 6MCY24: ~PKR 2.4mln). During 6MCY25, consolidated profit after tax of the Company witnessed a surge of ~48% and stood at ~PKR 2.6bln (6MCY24: 1.77bln). Going forward, overall profits may increase; however, margins from segmental operations may require attention.


Investment Performance

The Company's proactive investment strategy yielded good returns (CY24: ~PKR 4.4bln, CY23: ~PKR 3.2bln). To manage risk, ~46% of the total investment tilts towards government securities, followed by equity instruments (~40%), cash (~10%),  investment properties (~2%), and debt instruments (~1%). Similarly, during 6MCY25, investment income increased substantially and reported at ~PKR 3.6bln (6MCY24: ~PKR 2.4bln) mainly due to prudent investment approach of the company with investments in fixed income instruments and dividend yielding stocks. Vigilance in the book may support a stable income stream, going forward.


Sustainability

The Company intends to follow its growth strategy in the long run, while ensuring enhanced profitability along the way. Continuous enhancement of the Company's business and financial risk profile, aligning with its competitive position in the industry, remains crucial for its credit rating. At the same time, the company's liquidity should keep providing a safety net for its policyholder obligations. It is also imperative to sustain growth in revenue.


Financial Risk
Claim Efficiency

The Company holds an improved risk absorption capacity as reflected by its claims to liquid investments of ~38.4% as of CY24 (CY23: ~30%). Claims efficiency also improved as evidenced by improved outstanding days (CY24: ~361 days, CY23: ~438days). However, during 6MCY25, claims to liquid investment reduced to ~21.8% (6MCY24: ~28.3%).  Whereas, claims efficiency requires attention due to inflated days outstanding (6MCY25: ~656 days, 6MCY24: ~444days). Sustainability in the claim efficiency remains important.


Re-Insurance

The Company holds reinsurance treaties of several other reputed reinsurers, like Swiss Re (AA- by S&P; A+ by AM Best), Hannover Re (AA- by S&P and A+ by AM Best), Deutsche Re (A+ by S&P), and Trans Re (AA+ by S&P), Echo Re (A by S&P), Best Meridian Insurance Company (A- by AM Best), Oman Re (BBB- by Fitch), Malaysian Re (A- by AM Best; A by Fitch), SAVA Re (A by S&P , and AM Best), Volante Syndicate, (A+ by S&P; A by AM Best), Korean Re (A by S&P; A+ by AM Best), Chaucer Syndicate 1084 (A+ by S&P; A by AM Best), Odyssey Re (A+ by S&_; A by AM Best), CNA Hardy Syndicate (A+ by S&P; A by AM Best), Axis Syndicate (A+ by S&P; A by AM Best), Antares Syndicate (A+ by S&P; A by AM Best), Apollo Syndicate (A+ by S&P; A by AM Best), Navium Marine Ltd (A- by S&P; A by AM Best), Everest Insurance (A+ by S&P; A by AM Best), SCOR Re,(A+ by S&P; A by AM Best), Labuan Re (A- by AM Best), Transatlantic Re(A+ by S&P; A by AM Best), Arch Insurance (A+ by S&P), Sirius International (A- by both S&P and AM Best), and HCC International Insurance ((A+ by S&P; A++ by AM Best).


Cashflows & Coverages

The Company’s investment portfolio is primarily liquid investments. The total liquid assets parked with the Company stand at ~PKR 32.4bln as of CY24 (CY23: ~PKR 24bln). Liquid ratio of the Company comparing liquid assets to outstanding claims declined and stood at 2.5x (CY23: 2.9x) due to increased outstanding claims. During 6MCY25, total liquid assets parked with the Company stand at ~PKR 32.7bln (6MCY24: ~PKR 26.8bln). Liquid ratio of the Company, comparing liquid assets to outstanding claims, remained stable at 2.6x (6MCY24: 2.9x). Liquidity is expected to remain stable.


Capital Adequacy

As of CY24, the Company's equity base grew, backed by healthy reserves, to ~PKR 19.7bln (CY23: ~PKR 13.9bln), meeting the statutory capital adequacy requirement of SECP, with a core equity of ~PKR 2bln as of CY24. Similarly, as of 6MCY25, the Company has maintained sufficient equity levels of ~PKR 19.5bln (6MCY24: ~PKR 15bln), depicting an increase of ~26% and remained compliant with SECP’s requirements. The Company witnessed an increase in equity due to an increase in reserves and unappropriated profits. The trend is expected to remain the same.


 
 

Oct-25

www.pacra.com


Jun-25
6M
Dec-24
12M
Dec-23
12M
Dec-22
12M
Management Audited Audited Audited
A. BALANCE SHEET
1. Investments 33,665 33,335 24,985 20,752
2. Insurance Related Assets 23,685 17,858 11,927 11,586
3. Other Assets 2,108 1,755 1,497 1,414
4. Fixed Assets 287 295 160 181
5. Window Takaful Operations 0 0 0 0
Total Assets 59,745 53,243 38,570 33,933
1. Underwriting Provisions 11,249 8,762 7,297 6,056
2. Insurance Related Liabilities 21,778 18,953 13,888 13,818
3. Other Liabilities 7,205 6,282 3,861 3,549
4. Borrowings 0 0 0 0
5. Window Takaful Operations 0 0 0 0
Total Liabilities 40,232 33,996 25,046 23,423
Equity/Fund 19,513 19,247 13,524 10,693
B. INCOME STATEMENTS
CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENT
1. Gross Premium Written/Gross Contribution Written 14,398 23,057 19,459 14,798
2. Net Insurance Premium/Net Takaful Contribution 5,574 9,330 8,591 6,965
3. Underwriting Expenses (4,999) (8,386) (7,740) (6,500)
Underwriting Results 575 944 851 465
4. Investment Income 3,632 4,359 3,235 1,683
5. Other Income / (Expense) (45) 537 328 399
Profit Before Tax 4,162 5,841 4,414 2,547
6. Taxes (1,566) (2,296) (1,513) (936)
Profit After Tax 2,596 3,544 2,900 1,611
PARTICIPANTS' TAKAFUL FUND - PTF
1. Gross Contribution Written 2,060 2,670 2,288 1,741
2. Net Takaful Contribution 911 1,160 1,024 740
3. Net Takaful Claims (846) (1,329) (1,185) (731)
4. Direct Expenses Including Re-Takaful Rebate Earned 15 21 18 11
Surplus Before Investment & Other Income/(Expense) 80 (148) (143) 19
5. Investment Income 88 53 27 (7)
6. Other Income/(Expense) 33 118 112 65
Surplus for the Period 201 23 (4) 77
OPERATOR'S TAKAFUL FUND - OTF
1. Wakala Fee Income 506 829 690 537
2. Management, Commission & Other Acquisition Costs (342) (558) (387) (340)
Underwriting Income/(Loss) 164 271 303 197
3. Investment Income 117 122 71 22
4. Other Income/(Expense) 14 67 50 26
Profit Before tax 295 460 424 245
5. Taxes (119) (181) (174) (87)
Profit After tax 176 280 250 158
C. RATIO ANALYSIS
1. Profitability
Loss Ratio - Net Insurance & Takaful Claims / Net Insurance Premium or Takaful Contribution 53.2% 54.2% 58.8% 59.1%
Combined Ratio (Loss Ratio + Expense Ratio) 89.7% 89.9% 90.1% 93.3%
2. Investment Performance
Investment Yield 15.1% 22.6% 15.9% 6.9%
3. Liquidity
(Liquid Assets - Borrowings) / Outstanding Claims Including IBNR 2.6 2.5 2.9 2.5
4. Capital Adequacy
Liquid Investments / Equity (Funds) 167.7% 168.4% 178.0% 186.0%

Oct-25

www.pacra.com

Oct-25

www.pacra.com

  1. Rating Team Statements
    1. Rating is just an opinion about the creditworthiness of the entity and does not constitute a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell any security of the entity rated or to buy, hold, or sell the security rated, as the case may be. (Chapter III; 14-3-(x))
    2. Conflict of Interest
      1. The Rating Team or any of their family members have no interest in this rating (Chapter III; 12-2-(j))
      2. PACRA, the analysts involved in the rating process, and members of its rating committee and their family members do not have any conflict of interest relating to the rating done by them (Chapter III; 12-2-(e) & (k))
      3. The analyst is not a substantial shareholder of the customer being rated by PACRA [Annexure F; d-(ii)]
      4. Explanation: for the purpose of the above clause, the term "family members" shall include only those family members who are dependent on the analyst and members of the rating committee.
  2. Restrictions
    1. No director, officer, or employee of PACRA communicates the information acquired by him for use for rating purposes to any other person, except where required under law to do so. (Chapter III; 10-(5))
    2. PACRA does not disclose or discuss with outside parties or make improper use of the non-public information which has come to its knowledge during a business relationship with the customer. (Chapter III; 10-7-(d))
    3. PACRA does not make proposals or recommendations regarding the activities of rated entities that could impact a credit rating of the entity subject to rating. (Chapter III; 10-7-(k))
  3. Conduct of Business
    1. PACRA fulfills its obligations in a fair, efficient, transparent, and ethical manner and renders high standards of services in performing its functions and obligations. (Chapter III; 11-A-(a))
    2. PACRA uses due care in the preparation of this Rating Report. Our information has been obtained from sources we consider to be reliable, but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. PACRA does not, in every instance, independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing this Rating Report. (Clause 11-(A)(p))
    3. PACRA prohibits its employees and analysts from soliciting money, gifts, or favors from anyone with whom PACRA conducts business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(q))
    4. PACRA ensures before the commencement of the rating process that an analyst or employee has not had a recent employment or other significant business or personal relationship with the rated entity that may cause or may be perceived as causing a conflict of interest. (Chapter III; 11-A-(r))
    5. PACRA maintains the principle of integrity in seeking rating business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(u))
    6. PACRA promptly investigates in the event of misconduct or a breach of the policies, procedures, and controls, and takes appropriate steps to rectify any weaknesses to prevent any recurrence, along with suitable punitive action against the responsible employee(s). (Chapter III; 11-B-(m))
  4. Independence & Conflict of Interest
    1. PACRA receives compensation from the entity being rated or any third party for the rating services it offers. The receipt of this compensation has no influence on PACRA’s opinions or other analytical processes. In all instances, PACRA is committed to preserving the objectivity, integrity, and independence of its ratings. Our relationship is governed by two distinct mandates: i) rating mandate - signed with the entity being rated or issuer of the debt instrument, and ii) fee mandate - signed with the payer, which can be different from the entity.
    2. PACRA does not provide consultancy/advisory services or other services to any of its customers or their associated companies and associated undertakings that are being rated or have been rated by it during the preceding three years, unless it has an adequate mechanism in place ensuring that the provision of such services does not lead to a conflict of interest situation with its rating activities. (Chapter III; 12-2-(d))
    3. PACRA discloses that no shareholder directly or indirectly holding 10% or more of the share capital of PACRA also holds directly or indirectly 10% or more of the share capital of the entity which is subject to rating or the entity which issued the instrument subject to rating by PACRA. (Chapter III; 12-2-(f))
    4. PACRA ensures that the rating assigned to an entity or instrument is not affected by the existence of a business relationship between PACRA and the entity or any other party, or the non-existence of such a relationship. (Chapter III; 12-2-(i))
    5. PACRA ensures that the analysts or any of their family members shall not buy, sell, or engage in any transaction in any security which falls in the analyst’s area of primary analytical responsibility. This clause, however, does not apply to investments in securities through collective investment schemes. (Chapter III; 12-2-(l))
    6. PACRA has established policies and procedures governing investments and trading in securities by its employees and for monitoring the same to prevent insider trading, market manipulation, or any other market abuse. (Chapter III; 11-B-(g))
  5. Monitoring and Review
    1. PACRA monitors all the outstanding ratings continuously, and any potential change therein due to any event associated with the issuer, the security arrangement, the industry, etc., is disseminated to the market immediately and in an effective manner after appropriate consultation with the entity/issuer. (Chapter III; 17-(a))
    2. PACRA reviews all the outstanding ratings periodically on an annual basis. Provided that public dissemination of annual review and in an instance of change in rating will be made. (Chapter III; 17-(b))
    3. PACRA initiates an immediate review of the outstanding rating upon becoming aware of any information that may reasonably be expected to result in downgrading of the rating. (Chapter III; 17-(c))
    4. PACRA engages with the issuer and the debt securities trustee to remain updated on all information pertaining to the rating of the entity/instrument. (Chapter III; 17-(d))
  6. Probability of Default
    1. PACRA’s Rating Scale reflects the expectation of credit risk. The highest rating has the lowest relative likelihood of default (i.e., probability). PACRA’s transition studies capture the historical performance behavior of a specific rating notch. Transition behavior of the assigned rating can be obtained from PACRA’s Transition Study available at our website. (www.pacra.com) However, the actual transition of rating may not follow the pattern observed in the past. (Chapter III; 14-3(f)(vii))
  7. Proprietary Information
    1. All information contained herein is considered proprietary by PACRA. Hence, none of the information in this document can be copied or otherwise reproduced, stored, or disseminated in whole or in part in any form or by any means whatsoever by any person without PACRA’s prior written consent.

Oct-25

www.pacra.com