Rating History
Dissemination Date Long-Term Rating Short-Term Rating Outlook Action Rating Watch
23-Jun-26 AAA A1+ Stable Maintain -
23-Jun-25 AAA A1+ Stable Maintain -
22-Jun-24 AAA A1+ Stable Maintain -
23-Jun-23 AAA A1+ Stable Maintain -
25-Jun-22 AAA A1+ Stable Maintain -
About the Entity

National Bank of Pakistan, established in 1949, is majority-owned by the Government of Pakistan through the Ministry of Finance. As a Domestic Systemically Important Bank (D-SIB) and the country's agent bank, NBP operates 1,503 domestic and 14 international branches, employing over 15,000 staff. The Bank offers diversified services spanning retail, corporate, and investment banking, treasury, trade finance, remittances, SME banking, and Islamic banking, supported by subsidiaries in asset management, exchange services, and securities brokerage. Mr. Rehmat Ali Hasnie, with over 27 years in Investment Banking and Risk Management, is the CEO/President since May 2022.

Rating Rationale

The assigned ratings of National Bank of Pakistan (“NBP” or “the Bank”) reflect its preeminent position within Pakistan’s financial system, underpinned by sovereign ownership, systemic importance, and a strong franchise base. The Bank’s credit profile is supported by stable deposit mobilization, improving financial resilience, and sustained operating performance. NBP’s deposit franchise remained a key strength, with total deposits increasing by 14.6% YoY to PKR 4,429.3bln (CY24: PKR 3,865.6bln), reflecting sustained momentum in funding base expansion. Within this, CASA ratio improved slightly to 80.7% (CY24: 79.5%), indicating continued strength in low-cost deposits. Current deposits increased by 11.0% to PKR 2,163bln (CY24: PKR 1,948bln) and represented approximately 48.8% of total deposits (CY25). Customer deposits accounted for 88.5% of total funding base (CY24: 94%), indicating a moderate shift in funding mix while maintaining overall stability. Cost of funds declined sharply to 8.9% (CY24: 15.7%), supporting margin expansion. Net advances decreased to PKR 1,338bln (CY24: PKR 1,405bln), reflecting a contraction across lending portfolios amid prudent risk positioning. Consequently, the ADR remained low at 30.21%, underscoring a highly conservative lending stance and strong liquidity discipline. Asset quality improved during the period, with non-performing loans declining by 17.2% to PKR 223bln (CY24: PKR 269bln), indicating a strengthening credit profile. The NPL coverage ratio improved significantly to 106.4% (CY24: 83.9%), supported by credit loss allowances of PKR 219.7bln, reflecting a strong buffer against potential credit impairments and enhanced resilience in asset quality. The investment portfolio increased by approximately 6.7% to PKR 4,922bln (CY24: PKR 4,612bln), predominantly invested in government securities. The portfolio continues to provide liquidity support, stable income generation, and interest rate risk management benefits. Profitability improved significantly in CY25, driven by strong balance sheet positioning and cost efficiency gains. Net interest income increased to PKR 248.5bln (+45.5% YoY), supported by lower funding costs and a stable deposit base. Capitalization indicators remained sound.
The easing interest rate environment during CY25 resulted in revaluation gains; however, the subsequent 100bps increase in the policy rate during 1QCY26 led to revaluation losses. The impact on capitalization remained manageable, comfortably absorbed within the Bank’s well-established capital buffers and supported by consistent internal capital generation. Shareholders’ equity, excluding revaluation surplus, increased by 19.8% to PKR 405.9bln (CY24: PKR 338.7bln), while total equity stood at PKR 531.4bln. The Capital Adequacy Ratio moderated to 21.70% (CY25: 26.21%; CY24: 27.8%), while CET-1 stood at 19.65%, providing adequate buffers against market volatility. Liquidity remained strong, with the Liquidity Coverage Ratio at 215%, supported by a stable deposit base and a highly liquid sovereign investment portfolio. NBP continued its digital transformation through upgrades to its core banking system, strengthened cybersecurity across 6,000+ network nodes, and expansion of its digital ecosystem, including mobile banking (conventional and Islamic), EMV/contactless cards, Roshan Digital Accounts, Huawei Pay, API integrations, and merchant acquiring solutions. Overall, profitability improved, supported by a strong funding base and enhanced cost efficiency.

Key Rating Drivers

Bank demonstrated significant revenue growth through effective management of its assets, maintaining or improving profit margins will be crucial for sustainable financial health in the future.

Profile
Structure

The National Bank Of Pakistan ("NBP" or the "Bank") was established under the provisions of the NBP Ordinance 1949 as a scheduled bank and is listed on the Pakistan Stock Exchange (PSX).


Background

The National Bank of Pakistan was founded in 1949 following the independence of Pakistan to act as a key national financial institution. Over the years, it has remained committed to strengthening financial stability and supporting the economy through various challenges and changes. The Bank operates a broad network locally and internationally with a workforce exceeding 15,000 employees and strong global banking relationships. It continues to play an important role in the country’s economic progress by offering dependable financial services and contributing to development.


Operations

National Bank of Pakistan (NBP) is the country's premier commercial bank and a Domestic Systemically Important Bank. NBP offers retail, corporate, SME, agriculture, and Islamic banking services through 1,503 domestic and 14 international branches. NBP began Islamic banking in 2005 under the brand "NBP Aitmaad". At end-December 2025, there were 312 Islamic Banking Branches and 350 Islamic Banking Windows, offering Shariah-compliant products like Murabaha and Ijarah. The Bank has approved a plan to convert its entire conventional operations to Islamic banking, with full conversion expected to take effect by the end of 2027 in line with SBP regulatory directives (Page 17). As at Dec-25, Islamic Banking touchpoints reached 662 branches/windows, with total Islamic banking assets growing 87.4% YoY to PKR 625bn. NBP also supports agriculture finance (140,000+ farming families) and has enhanced customer convenience through its Digital App (2.3mln plus users) and a modernized Core Banking system.


Ownership
Ownership Structure

The ownership structure of National Bank of Pakistan (NBP) is dominated by the Federal Government of Pakistan, which holds a controlling stake of 75.20% through the State Bank of Pakistan. The remaining 24.80% is held by a diverse group of shareholders, including Public Sector Companies (4.38%), the General Public – Local (8.19%), Other shareholders comprising mutual funds, insurance companies, and corporate entities (4.55%), Foreign Companies (2.58%), Banks, DFIs, and Financial Institutions (1.25%), Government Ministries (0.40%), the General Public – Foreign (0.08%), and NIT & ICP (0.04%).


Stability

The ownership structure of the Bank is seen as stable, as no ownership changes are expected in the future. The majority stake will rest with the Government of Pakistan.


Business Acumen

NBP demonstrates strong business acumen by balancing commercial profitability with its national mandate. The bank has successfully executed a multi-year turnaround, resolving legacy pension liabilities and achieving record profit after tax of PKR 85.9bln in 2025.


Financial Strength

NBP, being a flagship entity under the umbrella of the Federal Government of Pakistan, benefits from a high willingness of the government to support the Bank in case the need arises, given its status as a Domestic Systemically Important Bank (D-SIB) and its critical role as an agent to the State Bank of Pakistan for treasury operations. This implied government support is further supplemented by the Bank's strong access to domestic and international capital markets.


Governance
Board Structure

The Board comprises seven members including the President/CEO, thereby meeting the minimum regulatory requirement of at least five directors, with the CEO serving as the only executive member on the Board. The Board of the National Bank of Pakistan reflects diversified expertise across banking, public finance, corporate leadership, and multiple industrial sectors, with most directors carrying over two decades of professional experience. The composition brings together seasoned professionals from financial markets, civil services, and large corporate groups, thereby strengthening governance oversight, strategic direction, and risk management capability of the institution.


Members’ Profile

The Board carries diversified experience including the financial sector, particularly banking, civil services, and other businesses. The majority of the directors have above two decades of experience. The directors having requisite experience and education are exempt from, SECP’s Code of Corporate Governance. Mr. Naved Abid Khan has recently been appointed as Chairman of the Board of the National Bank of Pakistan (NBP). He is a seasoned banker with over 30 years of experience, including senior leadership roles such as President & CEO of Faysal Bank Limited and CEO of ABN AMRO Bank Pakistan. He has also held key positions in major industry bodies, including the Pakistan Banks’ Association (PBA) and the Overseas Investors Chambers of Commerce and Industry (OICCI), and has served on several corporate boards in Pakistan. Mr. Farid Malik, a CFA and LSE graduate, holds nearly 30 years of expertise in infrastructure, corporate finance, and capital markets. He has led organizations like LSE Financial Services and worked with SECP and Tomen Power. Currently, he serves on the boards of NBP and Fauji Akbar Portia Marine Terminals. Mr. Amjad Mahmood, Additional Finance Secretary, brings 32 years of experience in public finance, regulatory affairs, and governance, including advisory roles with ADB and key Pakistani financial institutions. He holds multiple master’s degrees and specializes in public financial management and administration. Mr. Muhammad Sohail Tabba is a seasoned business leader with over three decades of experience across textiles, cement, energy, real estate, and retail, currently holding key leadership positions in major Pakistani conglomerates, including Lucky Cement and Lucky Core Industries. Mr. Navaid Hasib Malik is an experienced corporate leader and entrepreneur with extensive international exposure across hospitality, aviation, real estate, and diversified industrial sectors, having held senior executive and board positions with leading global organisations, airlines, and multinational ventures, and currently serving on multiple corporate boards and committees in Pakistan and abroad. Ms. Aaiza Khan is a finance and risk management professional with over a decade of experience spanning corporate banking, credit policy, risk management, and economic policy advisory, alongside active involvement in entrepreneurship and board leadership roles across financial services, technology, and corporate sectors.


Board Effectiveness

During CY25, "11" Board meetings (CY24: 13) were held; the attendance of directors remained high. Relatively, a large number of meetings reflect continuous monitoring of affairs of overseeing operations


Financial Transparency

The Audit Committee, the internal audit function, includes a review of the annual and interim financial statements of the Bank, before their approval by the Board, focusing on major judgmental areas, significant adjustments resulting from the audit, going concern assumption of any changes in accounting policies and practices, compliance with applicable accounting standards, compliance with regulations and other statutory and regulatory requirements. M/s  BDO Ebrahim & CO Chartered Accountant I M/s. A.F. Ferguson & Co, Chartered Accountants, classified in category 'A' by SBP and having a satisfactory QCR rating, are the external auditors for NBP. They expressed an unqualified opinion on the financial statement for the year ended 31st December 2025.


Management
Organizational Structure

NBP has a lean organizational structure that clearly defines responsibilities, authority, and reporting lines with proper monitoring and compliance mechanism. NBP has divided its functions into 20 departments, each of which reports directly to the President, except the Audit & Inspection, which reports to the Board Audit Committe.


Management Team

NBP’s senior management team comprises experienced bankers. Mr. Rehmat Ali Hasnie is the acting president and CEO of the Bank. He is serving in NBP since 2010 and has been the group chief of the Inclusive Development Group (IDG) since 2019. Mr. Abdul Wahid Sethi is the Chief Financial Officer of the Bank.He is a fellow member of the ICAP and holds an MBA Finance Degree from Imperial College Lahore. He has also served the Bank as SEVP/Chief Internal Auditor of the Bank. Prior to joining NBP in 2009, he worked at senior positions with various reputed Organizations. Mr. Haroon Zameer is Chief Risk officer, he has over three decades of experience of banking and finance in Pakistan, Singapore, Britain, and the Middle East. During his career he has worked in different leadership roles in corporate relationship management, leveraged finance, venture capital, banking operations, and risk management in American, European, Pakistani, and Japanese Organisations. Mr. Ausaf Ahmed has been appointed as Deputy Chief Technology Officer, bringing relevant academic background and professional experience in technology and digital solutions, with a growing track record in IT leadership, systems development, and technology-driven transformation initiatives. Mr. Muhammad Ismail currently serves as Group Cheif treasury and capital markets, Thirty years experienced treasury professional and in his current position, as the Group Chief Treasury & Capital Markets Group, he manages interest rate, foreign exchange and liquidity risks of the Bank. Ismail is an IBA graduate and joined NBP Treasury in 2004.


Effectiveness

NBP has an effective mix of management committees that are established to monitor performance and assure adherence to the policies and procedures. The Committees are 01) Audit Committee, 02)HR & Remuneration Committee, 03) Inclusive Development Committee , 04) Risk & Compliance Committee ,05) Strategy Committee and 06) Technology & Digitalization Committee.


MIS

NBP has continued to strengthen its technology and information security infrastructure, with ongoing enhancements to its cybersecurity framework aimed at improving resilience against evolving digital threats. The Bank is also progressing with the upgrade and phased rollout of its core banking application during 2025, which is expected to further enhance system efficiency, scalability, and service delivery capabilities.


Risk Management Framework

NBP’s risk management framework is overseen by the Risk Management Group (RMG), led by the Chief Risk Officer, Mr. Haroon Zameer. The RMG is responsible for developing and maintaining comprehensive risk management policies, frameworks, and analytical tools in line with SBP guidelines, while ensuring effective implementation across relevant business and control functions. The Group plays a central role in identifying, monitoring, and mitigating credit, market, operational, and liquidity risks, thereby supporting the Bank’s overall risk governance structure and financial stability.


Business Risk
Industry Dynamics

During CY25, Pakistan’s banking sector’s total assets grew by approximately 17.8% YoY, while investments surged by ~31.1% to PKR ~39.1trln (CY24: PKR ~29.8trln). Net advances of the sector declined by ~6% to PKR ~14.9trln (CY24: PKR ~15.8trln). Non-Performing Loans (NPLs) decreased by 9.7% YoY to PKR ~964bln (CY24: PKR ~1,068bln). The Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR) averaged 20.8% (CY24: 20.6%), slightly below historical averages due to higher risk-weighted assets and a shift toward low-yield government securities, yet capitalization remains adequate to absorb potential shocks. While the Advances to Deposit Ratio (ADR) was reported at 37.5% (CY24: 49.7%), which appears higher relative to declining advances, because deposit growth outpaced lending activity. This reflects a cautious lending stance by banks in a challenging macroeconomic environment, where risk-averse behavior and liquidity accumulation resulted in slower credit deployment, pushing the ADR downwards. In a lower policy rate environment, coupled with high operating costs and reduced lending, the sector faced margin pressure, leading to moderated profitability by end-CY25, despite robust capitalization and improving asset quality. (Source: SBP Compendium). Amid this sector-wide trend, NBP broadly aligned with the industry’s risk-averse positioning, with its investment portfolio expanding to PKR 4,922.1bln (CY24: PKR 4,612.0bln), reflecting continued preference for sovereign-backed assets. In contrast, net advances declined to PKR 1,338.1bln (CY24: PKR 1,404.0bln; ~4.7% decline), resulting in an ADR of 30.21%, consistent with the Bank’s conservative lending strategy and liquidity-driven balance sheet posture. In line with the declining interest rate environment, NBP’s top line witnessed some contraction due to asset yield repricing; however, this was more than offset by a significant reduction in interest expense, supported by the Bank’s strong low-cost deposit base. As a result, profitability improved meaningfully, with PAT registering a strong increase, driven by sustained cost discipline and improved funding efficiency despite sector-wide margin pressures.


Relative Position

NBP’s total deposit base increased to PKR 4,429bln in CY25 (CY24: PKR 3,865bln), reflecting a healthy growth trend during the period. Within this, customer deposits rose to PKR 2,188bln (CY24: PKR 1,801bln), indicating an expansion in core deposit mobilisation. The customer deposits constituted a reduced share of total deposits in CY25, while the Bank’s customer deposit market share in the industry declined to 11.08% (CY24: 12.27%), reflecting a slight moderation in relative positioning despite absolute growth in deposits.


Revenues

Mark-up earned contracted to PKR 781.1bln in CY25 (CY24: PKR 1,089.4bln), primarily due to policy rate reductions impacting yields on the investment book. Investment income declined as PIB and T-bill yields moderated following successive SBP rate cuts. Advances income registered PKR 183.1bln (CY24: PKR 233.3bln). Advances yield declined to 12.8% (CY24: 15.7%), and average investments yield declined to 6.3% (CY24: 9.5%).


Performance

Net mark-up income improved significantly to PKR 248.5bln in CY25 (CY24: PKR 170.9bln), as deposit costs declined sharply following the rate cycle reversal. Deposits cost fell to 6.8% (CY24: 12.2%) while borrowings cost moderated to 13.8% (CY24: 22.2%). Non-mark-up income stood at PKR 63.2bln (CY24: PKR 65.4bln), with fee and commission income at PKR 27.9bln and foreign exchange income recovering to PKR 15.6bln. Non-mark-up expenses declined to PKR 124.8bln in CY25 from PKR 177.4bln in CY24, primarily due to normalization of compensation expenses after the one-off anomaly recorded in CY24. Compensation expenses reduced significantly to PKR 72.8bln in CY25 compared to PKR 136.4bln in CY24, supporting the overall decline in operating expenses. Provisions net charge was PKR 8.0bln (CY24: PKR 2.3bln). Pre-tax profit recovered to PKR 178.9bln (CY24: PKR 56.7bln) and PAT to PKR 85.9bln (CY24: PKR 26.8bln).


Sustainability

CASA ratio stood at approximately 80.7% (Dec-25), comprising 48.8% current deposits and 31.9% savings deposits. The strong CASA franchise provides a structural cost advantage and funding stability for NBP. However, the shift from current to saving deposits (saving deposits: 31.9% vs. 29.1% in CY24) signals an increase in interest-sensitive liabilities. Loan growth remained subdued, with gross advances declining by approximately 3.5% in CY25, consistent with sector-wide caution.


Financial Risk
Credit Risk

NPLs (Stage III) declined to PKR 222.9bln in CY25 (CY24: PKR 269.2bln), a reduction of 17.2% YoY, driven by write-offs and improved recoveries. The impaired loan ratio improved to 13.8% (CY24: 16.1%), though it remains elevated relative to the sector average of approximately 6.5%. Provision coverage strengthened materially to 106.4% (CY24: 83.9%), providing adequate buffer against residual NPL risk. Stage I and Stage II net advances stood at PKR 1,334.9bln (CY24: PKR 1,361.4bln). ADR remained conservative at 30.21%, consistent with the sector's cautious lending posture. Government securities constituted 95.5% of the investment portfolio, minimizing credit risk within the investment book.


Market Risk

Government securities exposure reached PKR 4,701.1bln in CY25 (CY24: PKR 4,369.9bln), comprising predominantly fixed-rate PIBs and T-bills. The significant duration exposure of the fixed-rate portfolio creates mark-to-market sensitivity to interest rate movements; however, the declining rate environment in CY25 generated fair value gains on the FVOCI portfolio. FVOCI unrealized gain on government securities stood at PKR 71.9bln (CY24: PKR 50.0bln). Equity instruments plus subsidiaries/associates relative to equity stood at 34.2% (CY24: 12.0%), reflecting the increase in subsidiaries/associates' valuation to PKR 103.0bln. Market risk-weighted assets to investments ratio was 9.1% (CY24: 3.2%).


Liquidity and Funding

Liquid assets to deposits and borrowings (net of repo) stood at 81.5% (CY24: 77.6%), reflecting a highly liquid balance sheet. The Liquidity Coverage Ratio stood at 215% (CY24: 206%), well above the regulatory minimum. NSFR was 176% (CY24: 174%), indicating robust structural funding. Deposits grew by 14.6% to PKR 4,429bln, driven predominantly by government and public sector entity deposits (PKR 2,158bln; 48.7% of total). The shift in deposit mix toward saving deposits — up from 29.1% to 31.9% — signals incremental interest-rate sensitivity in the funding base. Borrowings from financial institutions remained elevated at PKR 1,655.4bln.


Capitalization

Capital Adequacy Ratio stood at 26.2% in Dec-25 (CY24: 27.8%), well above the SBP minimum requirement and the sector average of 20.8%. Tier I CAR was 19.6% (CY24: 20.5%) and Tier II was 6.6% (CY24: 7.3%). Equity grew to PKR 531.4bln at Dec-25 (CY24: PKR 456.9bln), driven by retained earnings of PKR 301.6bln and positive OCI on investments. The easing interest rate environment during CY25 resulted in revaluation gains; however, the subsequent 100bps increase in the policy rate during 1QCY26 led to revaluation losses. The impact on capitalization remained manageable, comfortably absorbed within the Bank’s well-established capital buffers and supported by consistent internal capital generation. Shareholders’ equity, excluding revaluation surplus, increased by 19.8% to PKR 405.9bln (CY24: PKR 338.7bln), while total equity stood at PKR 531.4bln.


 
 

Jun-26

www.pacra.com


(PKR mln)


Dec-25
12M
Dec-24
12M
Dec-23
12M
A. BALANCE SHEET
1. Stage I | Advances - net 1,125,119 1,286,080 1,384,887
2. Stage II | Advances - net 227,269 86,833 0
3. Stage III | Non-Performing Advances 222,984 269,289 220,826
4. Stage III | Impairment Provision (237,286) (237,335) (207,636)
5. Investments in Government Securities 4,701,106 4,358,337 4,193,233
6. Other Investments 220,994 253,997 210,131
7. Other Earning Assets 102,939 86,653 248,676
8. Non-Earning Assets 703,856 640,223 602,590
Total Assets 7,066,981 6,744,078 6,652,707
6. Deposits 4,429,265 3,865,565 3,674,359
7. Borrowings 1,697,679 1,945,787 2,186,008
8. Other Liabilities (Non-Interest Bearing) 408,618 475,775 409,584
Total Liabilities 6,535,562 6,287,127 6,269,952
Equity 531,419 456,951 382,756
B. INCOME STATEMENT
1. Mark Up Earned 781,113 1,089,415 1,024,658
2. Mark Up Expensed (532,601) (918,527) (855,910)
3. Non Mark Up Income 63,233 65,426 40,606
Total Income 311,745 236,314 209,354
4. Non-Mark Up Expenses (124,816) (177,379) (93,632)
5. Provisions/Write offs/Reversals (8,015) (2,258) (14,469)
Pre-Tax Profit 178,914 56,677 101,253
6. Taxes (93,001) (29,811) (49,413)
Profit After Tax 85,912 26,866 51,840
C. RATIO ANALYSIS
1. Performance
Net Mark Up Income / Avg. Assets 3.6% 2.6% 2.8%
Non-Mark Up Expenses / Total Income 40.0% 75.1% 44.7%
ROE 17.4% 6.4% 15.2%
2. Capital Adequacy
Equity / Total Assets (D+E+F) 7.5% 6.8% 5.8%
Capital Adequacy Ratio 26.2% 27.8% 25.5%
3. Funding & Liquidity
Liquid Assets / (Deposits + Borrowings Net of Repo) 81.5% 77.9% 66.9%
Net Financial Assets to Deposits Ratio [(Total Finances - net + Non-Performing Finances - net) / Deposits] 30.21% 36.34% 38.05%
Current Deposits / Deposits 48.8% 51.2% 53.6%
Saving Deposits / Deposits 31.9% 28.5% 25.2%
4. Credit Risk
Impaired Loan Ratio | [Stage III | Non-Performing Advances / Gross Advances] 13.8% 16.1% 13.5%

Jun-26

www.pacra.com

Jun-26

www.pacra.com

  1. Rating Team Statements
    1. Rating is just an opinion about the creditworthiness of the entity and does not constitute a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell any security of the entity rated or to buy, hold, or sell the security rated, as the case may be. (Chapter III; 14-3-(x))
    2. Conflict of Interest
      1. The Rating Team or any of their family members have no interest in this rating (Chapter III; 12-2-(j))
      2. PACRA, the analysts involved in the rating process, and members of its rating committee and their family members do not have any conflict of interest relating to the rating done by them (Chapter III; 12-2-(e) & (k))
      3. The analyst is not a substantial shareholder of the customer being rated by PACRA [Annexure F; d-(ii)]
      4. Explanation: for the purpose of the above clause, the term "family members" shall include only those family members who are dependent on the analyst and members of the rating committee.
  2. Restrictions
    1. No director, officer, or employee of PACRA communicates the information acquired by him for use for rating purposes to any other person, except where required under law to do so. (Chapter III; 10-(5))
    2. PACRA does not disclose or discuss with outside parties or make improper use of the non-public information which has come to its knowledge during a business relationship with the customer. (Chapter III; 10-7-(d))
    3. PACRA does not make proposals or recommendations regarding the activities of rated entities that could impact a credit rating of the entity subject to rating. (Chapter III; 10-7-(k))
  3. Conduct of Business
    1. PACRA fulfills its obligations in a fair, efficient, transparent, and ethical manner and renders high standards of services in performing its functions and obligations. (Chapter III; 11-A-(a))
    2. PACRA uses due care in the preparation of this Rating Report. Our information has been obtained from sources we consider to be reliable, but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. PACRA does not, in every instance, independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing this Rating Report. (Clause 11-(A)(p))
    3. PACRA prohibits its employees and analysts from soliciting money, gifts, or favors from anyone with whom PACRA conducts business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(q))
    4. PACRA ensures before the commencement of the rating process that an analyst or employee has not had a recent employment or other significant business or personal relationship with the rated entity that may cause or may be perceived as causing a conflict of interest. (Chapter III; 11-A-(r))
    5. PACRA maintains the principle of integrity in seeking rating business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(u))
    6. PACRA promptly investigates in the event of misconduct or a breach of the policies, procedures, and controls, and takes appropriate steps to rectify any weaknesses to prevent any recurrence, along with suitable punitive action against the responsible employee(s). (Chapter III; 11-B-(m))
  4. Independence & Conflict of Interest
    1. PACRA receives compensation from the entity being rated or any third party for the rating services it offers. The receipt of this compensation has no influence on PACRA’s opinions or other analytical processes. In all instances, PACRA is committed to preserving the objectivity, integrity, and independence of its ratings. Our relationship is governed by two distinct mandates: i) rating mandate - signed with the entity being rated or issuer of the debt instrument, and ii) fee mandate - signed with the payer, which can be different from the entity.
    2. PACRA does not provide consultancy/advisory services or other services to any of its customers or their associated companies and associated undertakings that are being rated or have been rated by it during the preceding three years, unless it has an adequate mechanism in place ensuring that the provision of such services does not lead to a conflict of interest situation with its rating activities. (Chapter III; 12-2-(d))
    3. PACRA discloses that no shareholder directly or indirectly holding 10% or more of the share capital of PACRA also holds directly or indirectly 10% or more of the share capital of the entity which is subject to rating or the entity which issued the instrument subject to rating by PACRA. (Chapter III; 12-2-(f))
    4. PACRA ensures that the rating assigned to an entity or instrument is not affected by the existence of a business relationship between PACRA and the entity or any other party, or the non-existence of such a relationship. (Chapter III; 12-2-(i))
    5. PACRA ensures that the analysts or any of their family members shall not buy, sell, or engage in any transaction in any security which falls in the analyst’s area of primary analytical responsibility. This clause, however, does not apply to investments in securities through collective investment schemes. (Chapter III; 12-2-(l))
    6. PACRA has established policies and procedures governing investments and trading in securities by its employees and for monitoring the same to prevent insider trading, market manipulation, or any other market abuse. (Chapter III; 11-B-(g))
  5. Monitoring and Review
    1. PACRA monitors all the outstanding ratings continuously, and any potential change therein due to any event associated with the issuer, the security arrangement, the industry, etc., is disseminated to the market immediately and in an effective manner after appropriate consultation with the entity/issuer. (Chapter III; 17-(a))
    2. PACRA reviews all the outstanding ratings periodically on an annual basis. Provided that public dissemination of annual review and in an instance of change in rating will be made. (Chapter III; 17-(b))
    3. PACRA initiates an immediate review of the outstanding rating upon becoming aware of any information that may reasonably be expected to result in downgrading of the rating. (Chapter III; 17-(c))
    4. PACRA engages with the issuer and the debt securities trustee to remain updated on all information pertaining to the rating of the entity/instrument. (Chapter III; 17-(d))
  6. Probability of Default
    1. PACRA’s Rating Scale reflects the expectation of credit risk. The highest rating has the lowest relative likelihood of default (i.e., probability). PACRA’s transition studies capture the historical performance behavior of a specific rating notch. Transition behavior of the assigned rating can be obtained from PACRA’s Transition Study available at our website. (www.pacra.com) However, the actual transition of rating may not follow the pattern observed in the past. (Chapter III; 14-3(f)(vii))
  7. Proprietary Information
    1. All information contained herein is considered proprietary by PACRA. Hence, none of the information in this document can be copied or otherwise reproduced, stored, or disseminated in whole or in part in any form or by any means whatsoever by any person without PACRA’s prior written consent.

Jun-26

www.pacra.com