Rating History
Dissemination Date Long-Term Rating Short-Term Rating Outlook Action Rating Watch
14-Jul-26 A- A2 Stable Initial -
About the Entity

Mega Motor Company (Pvt.) Limited was incorporated in May 2024. As the sole authorized BYD distributor in Pakistan, it currently operates under a CBU import model while developing CKD assembly at its Gharo facility. The Company is equally owned by Hub Power Holdings Limited (HPHL) and Mega Conglomerate (Pvt.) Limited. The Board comprises four members, with Mr. Aly Khan serving as both CEO and Chairman.

Rating Rationale

Mega Motor Company (Pvt.) Limited (MMC) holds a distinctive first-mover position within Pakistan’s nascent New Energy Vehicle (NEV) sector as the country’s sole authorized distributor of BYD vehicles, operating under a manufacturing, supply, and distribution arrangement with BYD Auto Industry Company Limited (China), the world’s largest NEV manufacturer by volume. The Company currently operates under a Completely Built Unit (CBU) distribution model and is transitioning to Completely Knocked Down (CKD) assembly of various models upon commissioning its plant at Gharo, District Thatta. The facility, spanning 73 acres of land, is progressing towards a targeted annual capacity of 25,000 units on a double-shift basis, with completion expected by end-CY26. The ratings are anchored by the strength of MMC's strategic sponsorship, its association with BYD, and its positioning within Pakistan's evolving energy and mobility landscape. According to the Pakistan Automotive Manufacturers Association (PAMA), the passenger vehicle segment (cars, jeeps, and LCVs) recorded a strong recovery during 10MFY26, with volumes rising to 166,044 units from 111,518 units in the SPLY. Within this recovery, NEVs are gradually increasing their share of total passenger vehicle sales, supported by structurally improving demand drivers. Elevated fuel prices, rapid expansion of rooftop solar installations, and rising consumer preference for fuel-efficient alternatives are strengthening the NEV value proposition, particularly in urban centers. MMC has benefited from encouraging market response, with vehicle bookings and customer traction ahead of initial projections. Its product portfolio spans Sedans to PHEV models, catering to multiple consumer segments. The BYD franchise provides a competitive edge through proprietary technologies such as Blade Battery and DM-i super hybrid systems, offering differentiation versus both traditional OEMs and emerging Chinese entrants in the local market. MMC has achieved meaningful operational milestones since its inception, building a growing dealership network and after-sales service capabilities consistent with BYD's international service standards. Volumes have scaled materially over the review period, reflecting strong initial market acceptance. Operational scalability is supported by BYD's global supply chain infrastructure, HUBCO's institutional governance and project financing capabilities, and Mega Conglomerate's local execution strength in real estate, shipping, logistics, construction, and facilities management. The combined sponsorship profile provides MMC with financial resources, sectoral depth, and stakeholder credibility exceeding typical benchmarks for an entity at this stage of development. The financial profile reflects an entity in active scale-up, with strong revenue growth and gradually improving operating margins as scale builds. The advance-payment sales model provides structural working capital support by eliminating receivable risk, resulting in adequate liquidity and comfortable coverage indicators. Leverage remains manageable, supported by sponsor equity injections, though it is expected to rise as construction financing is drawn. The Company intends to operate a CKD business in parallel with its existing CBU operations, with some models being marketed on a CBU basis and others under CKD.

Key Rating Drivers

The ratings are dependent upon timely project commissioning within the envisaged capital outlay and financing structure, while maintaining a prudent financial profile as LT borrowings progressively become operational. Sustained sponsor commitment and governance oversight remain integral to the ratings. Successful operational ramp-up and adequate coverage and liquidity indicators will remain important.

Profile
Legal Structure

Mega Motor Company (Private) Limited (hereinafter ‘MMC’ or ‘the Company’) is a private limited company incorporated on May 6, 2024, under the Companies Act, 2017, in Pakistan. The Company’s registered office is located at the 9th Floor, Ocean Tower, Block 9, Main Clifton Road, Karachi. The Company was initially incorporated as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Hub Power Holdings Limited (HPHL). Pursuant to a joint venture agreement executed on December 03, 2024, Mega Conglomerate (Private) Limited acquired a 50% equity stake in MMC first on March 11, 2026, thereby converting the Company into an equal-share 50:50 joint venture.


Background

MMC was established with the primary objective of introducing, assembling, and progressively manufacturing BYD electric and new energy vehicles in Pakistan under a distribution arrangement with BYD Auto Industry Company Limited (China), the world’s largest manufacturer of new energy vehicles (NEVs) by volume. The Company operates as Pakistan’s sole authorized assembler and distributor of BYD vehicles.

The strategic rationale for MMC’s establishment sits at the intersection of two macroeconomic themes: Pakistan’s imperative to reduce import dependency on fossil fuels through automotive electrification, and HUBCO’s long-term strategic vision of participating in the energy-mobility convergence. As Pakistan’s largest private-sector power utility, HUBCO generates the electricity that EVs will consume, positioning MMC as a natural downstream extension of HUBCO’s energy value chain. Mega Conglomerate, the co-sponsor, brings automotive distribution expertise, shipping & logistics, and real estate infrastructure capabilities. Promotion of green mobility across Pakistan represents a foundational objective underpinning MMC’s establishment, aligning with both sponsors’ long-term environmental and sustainability commitments.


Operations

MMC’s operations transitioned from a pre-revenue startup (May 2024 incorporation) to a commercially active entity recording revenues of PKR 36.9 billion in the nine months ended March 2026. MMC’s business model is structured in three progressive phases. Phase 1 (ongoing, FY25–26) involves importing Completely Built-Up (CBU) and Completely Knocked-Down (CKD) vehicles through authorized dealers, with sales transacted on an advance-payment basis. Phase 2 (planned) targets the assembly of CKD vehicles at its Gharo plant. Phase 3 (planned) targets progressive localization to reduce the effective rate of import levy, which currently represents the single largest constraint on net profitability.

MMC’s product portfolio encompasses the BYD Atto 3 (compact BEV SUV), BYD Seal (sports BEV sedan), BYD Sealion 6 (PHEV SUV with DM-i hybrid system), BYD Shark 6 (PHEV pickup), and the subsequently launched BYD Atto 2 (entry-level BEV SUV) and BYD Sealion 7 (premium BEV SUV). The product lineup is distinguished by BYD’s proprietary Blade Battery technology (lithium iron phosphate chemistry), which offers superior thermal stability in Pakistan’s high-temperature climate, and the DM-i super hybrid system (fuel consumption of approximately 4.4 litres per 100 kilometers), which provides a compelling proposition in a market constrained by limited charging infrastructure and frequent grid power outages.

The Gharo Plant, located on 73 acres of freehold land in District Thatta, Sindh, is under active construction with targeted annual assembly capacity of 25,000 units (double-shift basis) upon full commissioning, expected CY 2026. The equipment supply and installation contract has been awarded to Automotive Engineering Corporation and Jiangsu Sunny Dynamic Intelligent Equipment Co., Ltd.


Ownership
Ownership Structure

MMC is owned on a 50:50 basis by Hub Power Holdings Limited (HPHL) and Mega Conglomerate (Private) Limited. HPHL is a 100% wholly-owned subsidiary of The Hub Power Company Limited (HUBCO), a PSX-listed entity with over three decades of operational history as Pakistan’s largest private-sector power utility. Mega Conglomerate (Pvt.) Limited is a private holding company owned 88% by Mr. Muhammad Habibullah Khan and 12% by Mrs. Nusrat Khan (spouse), with interests spanning real estate development, food processing (Haleeb Foods via Mega Foods), technology, and automotive.


As reflected in the above table, the 50:50 JV structure was formalized on December 03, 2025, and then Mega Conglomerate subscribed to 200 million ordinary shares at par for PKR 2,000 million on March 11, 2026.


Stability

Ownership stability is assessed as adequate, anchored by HUBCO’s institutional credibility as a PSX-listed entity subject to CCG requirements, SECP supervision, and multilateral lender covenants. HPHL’s interest in MMC is held as a strategic diversification investment within HUBCO’s long-term group strategy; involuntary disposition is considered highly unlikely given the public accountability and strategic fit. Mega Group is a diversified conglomerate with strategic investments across several high-growth sectors of Pakistan’s economy. The Mega Group’s substantial real estate and industrial asset base provides a degree of financial anchoring.


Business Acumen

The combined business acumen of the two sponsoring groups is assessed as adequate for the current phase of MMC’s development: HUBCO providing institutional governance and financing capability, and Mega Conglomerate contributing the BYD distribution and supply relationship and physical infrastructure execution.


Financial Strength

MMC’s financial strength is backstopped by two well-capitalized sponsor groups. HUBCO is one of Pakistan’s most financially robust listed entities, with consolidated assets exceeding PKR 100 billion and revenues underpinned by long-term government-backed Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs). Mega Group sponsors have substantial net worth, enabling them to assist the Company during periods of financial distress. Their equity investments in the Company further highlight their commitment, viability, and financial stability.


Governance
Board Structure

MMC’s Board comprises four members, consisting of two members from the sponsoring family and the other two directors are nominated by HPHL (HUBCO). Despite being a private limited company, the small size of the Board and the absence of independent oversight suggest there is room for improvement in its governance framework, particularly given its holding structure.


Members’ Profile

The profiles of the Board of Directors are provided below:

Mr. Aly Khan – Chief Executive Officer & Director (Mega Conglomerate Nominee): Mr. Aly Khan holds a Master of Public Policy (MPP) from Harvard Kennedy School. He serves as the CEO of MMC and is a key-man in the BYD-MMC relationship in Pakistan. His extensive experience in new energy vehicles and sustainable mobility positions him as the primary nexus between MMC, BYD Auto Industry Company Limited, and the Company’s strategic direction.

Ms. Aleeya Khan – Director (Mega Conglomerate Nominee): Ms. Aleeya Khan holds a Master of Architecture (M. Arch) from Columbia University. Her professional background in architecture, urban development, and real estate is directly relevant to the physical infrastructure dimension of MMC’s expansion, including the development of the Gharo manufacturing facility.

Mr. Kamran Kamal – Director (HUBCO Nominee): Mr. Kamran Kamal holds a postgraduate degree from Boston College (MSc). He brings extensive experience in energy-sector project financing and infrastructure management through his association with HUBCO, providing MMC’s Board with institutional governance capability and project execution expertise.

Mr. Muhammad Saqib – Director (HUBCO Nominee): Mr. Muhammad Saqib holds an MBA and is a CFA charter holder from IBA Karachi. He brings financial expertise and capital markets acumen through his HUBCO affiliation, strengthening the Board’s oversight of MMC’s financial reporting, funding structure, and investment decisions.


Board Effectiveness

Given MMC’s early operational stage, the board functions in company-building and strategic oversight mode. One board member, Mr. Saqib has been appointed for reviewing internal matters and an internal audit function has been established. The formation of specialized board committees would strengthen governance architecture. The primary concerns, absence of independent oversight, executive-governance overlap (CEO on board), and absence of functioning committees, are noted as areas for improvement.


Financial Transparency

MMC’s external auditor, A.F. Ferguson & Co. (a Big-4 firm), is listed on the State Bank of Pakistan’s panel of auditors in Category ‘A’. The firm issued an unqualified audit opinion on the Company’s unconsolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2025.


Management
Organizational Structure

MMC operates a functional management structure with the CEO at the apex, supported by eight direct reports each heading a critical business function: Finance & Company Secretarial, Production/Operations/Localization, Sales/Aftersales/Strategy, Projects, Information Technology, Marketing, Supply Chain, and Human Resources. This structure is appropriate for a private entity in the ramp-up phase, providing both functional depth and operational coverage across the key disciplines required to simultaneously manage an import-and-sell operation, a large-scale construction project (Gharo Plant), and an incipient manufacturing setup.


Management Team

The senior management team of MMC comprises experienced professionals with diverse industry backgrounds and strong technical and managerial credentials. Mr. Aly Khan, the CEO and also chairs the board, provides the primary automotive and EV nexus, his instrumental role in establishing the BYD arrangement makes him the de facto anchor of the OEM relationship. Mr. Abdus Salam Bawany serves as CFO and Company Secretary, bringing over 15 years of experience with prior exposure at Laraib Energy, HUBCO, PwC UAE, and KPMG. He is an FCA from ICAP and has been associated with MMC for ~1.6 years. This leadership team is supported by a group of experienced professionals, ensuring strong governance and strategic direction.


Effectiveness

Each department head is responsible for overseeing and managing the affairs of their respective departments. Clearly defined roles and responsibilities within the organization enhance the overall effectiveness of the organizational structure.


MIS

The Company is currently using Oracle Financials for the financial recording. At the same time, the Company is undergoing training and testing for SAP implementation, which is scheduled to go live before June 2026. The SAP system provides integrated management information across financial reporting, supply chain, production planning, and dealer management, enabling the analytical and operational oversight functions required for a complex multi-stakeholder environment.


Control Environment

The Company has established sound internal control and risk management environment through active monitoring by the Chairman and the Board of Directors. This includes overseeing internal control procedures and ensuring compliance, which helps maintain a balance of power within the organization. Risk management framework is primarily anchored through the CEO and monitored at board level, with compliance oversight supported by HPHL’s parent-level governance standards.


Business Risk
Industry Dynamics

The global automotive industry is undergoing a structural transition from Internal Combustion Engine (ICE) vehicles toward New Energy Vehicles (NEVs), including Battery Electric Vehicles (BEVs), Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles (PHEVs), and Fuel Cell Electric Vehicles (FCEVs). Global NEV sales exceeded 17 million units in 2024, representing nearly 20% of total new vehicle sales, with penetration projected to surpass 40% by 2030. This shift is being driven by declining battery costs (LFP packs approaching USD 75–80/kWh), expanding charging infrastructure, and regulatory mandates such as the EU’s 2035 ICE ban and China’s dual-credit policy.

China occupies a dominant position in the NEV ecosystem as the largest market, manufacturer, and technology exporter. NEV penetration in China’s passenger vehicle market reached 54% in 2025, rising to 56% in Dec-25. BYD sold ~4.6 million NEVs in 2025, including ~2.26 million BEVs, surpassing Tesla in annual BEV sales and maintaining global NEV leadership with 23.1% market share (Tesla: 8.1%). Supported by China’s policy framework and supply-chain subsidies, Chinese OEMs have achieved scale-driven cost advantages. BYD’s Blade Battery, DM-i hybrid system, and e-Platform 3.0 represent technological strengths now being exported to emerging markets, including Pakistan through MMC.

Pakistan’s passenger vehicle market, historically dominated by Japanese ICE assemblers, averages ~200,000–220,000 annual sales. NEV penetration remains below 5% of registrations in FY26, constrained by limited charging infrastructure, price premiums, grid reliability concerns, and low consumer familiarity. Nevertheless, the segment has grown from negligible volumes to an estimated 8,000–10,000 units annually, supported by early adopters and led by BYD through MMC. Penetration reaching 10%–15% over the next 3–5 years appears plausible, contingent upon infrastructure and affordability improvements.

Policy support remains under development. Proposed revisions to the National Electric Vehicle Policy and Automotive Development Policy include concessionary customs duties on NEV imports, GST incentives for localized assembly, battery localization support, and preferential treatment for NEV manufacturing. Separately, FBR is reviewing a levy framework linked to local content rather than CIF value, which could materially reduce effective tax burdens and support established assemblers with localization capability.

Demand fundamentals are strengthening through multiple structural drivers. Pakistan added an estimated 17GW of rooftop and distributed solar capacity during FY24–FY26, improving EV economics through near-zero marginal charging costs. Concurrently, fuel-import reduction objectives, elevated petroleum prices, and geopolitical supply disruptions have widened the operating cost advantage of EVs and PHEVs, supporting adoption.

Charging infrastructure remains the principal near-term constraint. HUBCO Green plans EV charging deployment across urban corridors and motorways, while NEPRA and the Ministry of Energy are finalizing a dedicated EV charging tariff framework to improve commercial viability. In this environment, BYD’s dual BEV-PHEV strategy, including DM-i models such as Sealion 6 and Shark 6, provides a practical bridge by reducing range anxiety and expanding the addressable market. MMC further benefits from BYD’s bundled home chargers and dealer-network charging rollout pending wider public infrastructure development.

Competitive intensity is increasing as Chinese and regional OEMs expand into Pakistan. Chery (Omoda/Jaecoo), SAIC-MG, Haval, and Changan have entered or announced NEV offerings, while Japanese and Korean brands are introducing hybrid and EV variants through local partners. This intensifying landscape may pressure MMC’s pricing and market share over time, particularly in the mid-market segment. Accordingly, MMC’s competitive positioning will increasingly depend on BYD’s technological differentiation, after-sales network strength, localization progress, and cost efficiencies expected from the Gharo Plant.


Relative Position

Within Pakistan’s emerging NEV market, MMC holds a meaningful first-mover advantage as the sole authorized distributor of BYD vehicles, the world’s largest NEV manufacturer. MMC currently offers the broadest BEV and PHEV portfolio in Pakistan, comprising five models across a PKR 7.3 million–19.9 million price range. The BYD arrangement provides access to proprietary technologies, including the Blade Battery and DM-i hybrid platform, alongside a strong global product pipeline and the credibility of an OEM that surpassed Tesla in FY24 to become the world’s largest NEV producer by volume. MMC’s annualized revenue run-rate of approximately PKR 52–55 billion reflects early market acceptance among urban and higher-income consumers.

MMC’s competitive positioning is supported by several structural strengths. The Gharo Plant, involving committed capex on a 73-acre freehold site, represents a significant manufacturing investment that positions the Company to benefit from localization-led cost efficiencies. The advance-payment sales model further enhances revenue visibility through customer-backed order inflows and minimizes receivable risk. Additionally, the 50:50 joint venture between HUBCO and Mega Conglomerate combines energy-sector linkages, institutional governance, and distribution expertise, with potential long-term advantages arising from HUBCO’s energy ecosystem and charging infrastructure capabilities.

However, several challenges remain relevant. The current import levy structure continues to constrain profitability until localization thresholds are achieved, while execution risk associated with the Gharo Plant could delay anticipated cost and margin benefits. Competitive pressure is also increasing as new entrants expand their NEV offerings.

Overall, MMC’s relative position is assessed as strong within the NEV sub-segment, underpinned by its first-mover advantage, superior product depth, manufacturing investment commitment, and sponsorship strength, though it remains vulnerable to policy delays, macroeconomic volatility, and intensifying supply-side competition as the market deepens.


Revenues

MMC’s revenue growth reflects a strong early-stage commercial scale-up. From commencement of operations in May 2024, the Company recorded net revenues of PKR 10.9 billion during its inaugural 14-month period (FY25: May 2024–Jun 2025), which increased to PKR 36.9 billion in 9MFY26, representing a substantial increase on a comparable-period basis. The third quarter of FY26 alone contributed PKR 13.3 billion in revenues, indicating continued sales momentum and an expanding market presence.

The Company’s revenue model is supported by two key structural characteristics. First, MMC operates predominantly on an advance-payment sales model, whereby vehicle purchases are secured through pre-delivery customer payments. This resulted in contract liabilities of PKR 10.3 billion at Mar-26, providing meaningful revenue visibility, strengthening liquidity, and largely eliminating trade receivable exposure. Second, MMC has progressively broadened its product offering to deepen market penetration. The initial portfolio comprising Atto 3, and Seal was expanded with the launch of Shark 6 in Jul-25 and Atto 2 and Sealion 7 in Jan-26, enhancing product diversity across customer segments. Going forward, Atto 2 and Atto 3 are expected to remain key volume drivers and support wider adoption within the domestic EV market. Revenue generation is also expected to remain concentrated in major urban centers, primarily Karachi, Lahore, and Islamabad, where charging infrastructure, consumer purchasing power, and EV adoption trends are relatively more developed.


Margins

MMC’s profitability profile reflects the evolving economics of an early-stage automotive business. Gross margins moderated from 15.9% in FY25 (14 months) to 12.6% in 9MFY26 and 11.7% in Q3 FY26. The comparatively elevated FY25 margin likely benefited from favorable startup dynamics, including a limited model portfolio, early-adopter demand, and potentially advantageous initial inventory pricing. The subsequent moderation appears attributable to a combination of evolving product mix, increasing competitive pricing pressure from new market entrants, exchange-rate-driven cost pressures on imported inventory, and comparatively lower wholesale margins associated with higher sales volumes.

Despite this, operating profitability showed notable improvement as scale increased. Selling and marketing expenses remained sizeable, reflecting ongoing investments in brand development, dealership expansion, and market positioning; however, these costs declined materially as a percentage of revenue, from 14.4% in FY25 to 5.6% in 9MFY26, indicating emerging operating leverage. Consequently, MMC recorded operating profit of PKR 2,102 million in 9MFY26 (5.7% margin), compared to an operating loss of PKR 228 million in FY25. At the net level, profitability continues to be constrained by the import levy, which is charged as a minimum tax on imported vehicles and remains a key structural cost factor under the current CBU model. Nonetheless, the Company recorded net profit of PKR 384 million in 9MFY26 (1.0% margin), representing an important transition toward sustainable profitability.

Looking ahead, the medium-term margin outlook remains closely linked to MMC’s transition toward local assembly. Commencement of operations at the Gharo Plant and increasing localization levels are expected to gradually reduce the levy burden and improve cost economics, supporting margin expansion over time. Accordingly, timely commissioning and operational ramp-up of the Gharo facility remain important determinants of the Company’s future profitability profile.


Sustainability

MMC’s business sustainability is anchored in three interrelated factors: (i) execution of its capital investment program and the resulting cash flow profile; (ii) the transition toward localized assembly and associated cost efficiencies; and (iii) the long-term sustainability of the BYD partnership.

From a capital investment perspective, the Gharo Plant remains the centerpiece of MMC’s long-term strategy, with construction work-in-progress of PKR 17.6 billion at Mar-26 funded through a combination of sponsor equity and long-term financing. Targeted for commissioning by end-2026, the facility is expected to provide annual assembly capacity of approximately 25,000 units on a double-shift basis. While the scale of investment reflects a long-term growth commitment, the associated recovery profile will depend on successful commercialization, sustained sales momentum, and the Company’s ability to generate stable operating cash flows through the ramp-up phase. Continued sponsor support and disciplined execution will remain important during this transition.

A second determinant of sustainability is MMC’s planned migration from CBU imports toward localized assembly. Under Pakistan’s EV policy framework, increasing local content provides a structural pathway for improving cost competitiveness through gradual reduction in import-related levy exposure. Accordingly, the Company’s progression from CBU imports to CKD assembly and eventually greater localization is expected to support margin enhancement and strengthen operating economics over time. However, the pace of this transition will depend on supplier ecosystem development, localization capability, regulatory continuity, and successful transfer of technical expertise, introducing execution and timing considerations.

Equally important is the durability of MMC’s relationship with BYD, which remains central to the Company’s business model and competitive positioning. The partnership benefits from visible long-term commitment, reflected through investment in local manufacturing infrastructure, a steadily expanding product pipeline, and technical support for plant development and operations. This alignment provides MMC with access to globally recognized technology, product innovation, and brand equity, supporting the sustainability of its market position as Pakistan’s EV ecosystem continues to evolve.


Financial Risk
Working capital

MMC’s working capital position strengthened during the review period, with the current ratio improving from 1.0x at Jun-25 to 1.2x at Mar-26, supported by higher customer advances and the equity rights issuance. Cash and bank balances also increased, providing improved near-term liquidity. Nonetheless, certain working capital considerations warrant continued monitoring. Sales tax recoverable increased materially, primarily due to the input tax credit mechanism applicable to imported vehicles, under which sales tax paid on imports is adjusted against output tax on sales. Inventory management also remains a key consideration. While inventory days improved during the period, reflecting stronger turnover, the CBU import model inherently carries foreign exchange exposure due to USD/CNY-linked procurement costs. Combined raw material and finished goods inventory of ~PKR 8.1 billion at Mar-26 remains significant relative to 9M COGS of PKR 32.2 billion, indicating an efficient but relatively lean inventory position that may limit operational flexibility during supply chain disruptions.

Net working capital requirements continue to be funded primarily through customer advances, providing a capital-efficient funding source and supporting a manageable cash conversion cycle of ~42 days, excluding sales tax recoverable.


Coverages

Coverage indicators improved in 9MFY26 compared to the FY25 period, supported by stronger operating profitability and a relatively contained finance cost burden. EBITDA-to-finance cost coverage stood at 43.6x in 9MFY26, compared to comparatively lower levels in FY25, reflecting the increase in EBITDA from PKR 202 million to PKR 2,793 million, while finance costs remained relatively stable at PKR 154 million (FY25: PKR 145 million). FCFO coverage of finance cost also improved, recovering from negative levels in FY25 to 13.3x in 9MFY26, indicating improved internal cash generation and debt-servicing capacity. Debt payback of 6.6 years at Mar-26 reflects the long-tenor USD and PKR-denominated financing obtained for the Gharo Plant and remains broadly aligned with project-finance structures typically associated with manufacturing expansion.

However, current coverage metrics should be viewed in the context of the Company’s evolving capital structure. Finance costs in 9MFY26 remain relatively low compared to the overall debt burden, suggesting that coverage indicators may moderate as the remaining long-term facilities are drawn, full debt servicing commences, and amortization of the USD-denominated facility begins in FY26 and FY27. Accordingly, sustained operating cash flow generation following plant commercialization will remain important to maintaining coverage adequacy over the medium term.


Capitalization

The Company’s capitalization structure has evolved materially during the review period, reflecting a balanced mix of equity infusion and long-term debt mobilization to finance the Gharo Plant construction. Paid-up share capital increased from PKR 4,000 million at FY25 inception to PKR 17,200 million at Mar-26, following aggregate rights injections of PKR 13,200 million by HPHL and Mega Conglomerate during 9MFY26. After accounting for accumulated losses of PKR 585 million, representing FY25 losses partially offset by profitability in 9MFY26, total equity stood at PKR 16,615 million. Simultaneously, total borrowings increased to ~PKR 7,045 million at Mar-26 (FY25: ~PKR 1,525 million), primarily reflecting drawdowns of long-term facilities linked to project development. In Mar'26, the Company's leverage ratio stood at ~29.8%, which remains manageable and broadly commensurate with the Company’s current expansion phase and equity-supported capital structure.

Going forward, capitalization metrics will require close monitoring as the remaining long-term facilities are drawn, project capex reaches completion, and debt amortization commences. The sustainability of the current leverage profile will remain dependent on timely project commissioning, commercialization of the Gharo Plant, and the Company’s ability to translate the expanded asset base into stable operating cash flows.


 
 

Jul-26

www.pacra.com


(PKR mln)


Mar-26
9M
Jun-25
12M
Management Audited
A. BALANCE SHEET
1. Non-Current Assets 21,272 5,297
2. Investments 0 0
3. Related Party Exposure 0 0
4. Current Assets 17,108 5,812
a. Inventories 8,076 3,808
b. Trade Receivables 0 0
5. Total Assets 38,381 11,109
6. Current Liabilities 14,282 5,913
a. Trade Payables 352 194
7. Borrowings 7,045 125
8. Related Party Exposure 0 1,446
9. Non-Current Liabilities 437 547
10. Net Assets 16,615 3,078
11. Shareholders' Equity 16,615 3,078
B. INCOME STATEMENT
1. Sales 36,871 10,870
a. Cost of Good Sold (32,222) (9,142)
2. Gross Profit 4,649 1,728
a. Operating Expenses (2,547) (1,956)
3. Operating Profit 2,102 (228)
a. Non Operating Income or (Expense) 311 76
4. Profit or (Loss) before Interest and Tax 2,413 (152)
a. Total Finance Cost (154) (145)
b. Taxation (1,875) (584)
6. Net Income Or (Loss) 384 (882)
C. CASH FLOW STATEMENT
a. Free Cash Flows from Operations (FCFO) 850 (507)
b. Net Cash from Operating Activities before Working Capital Changes 514 (508)
c. Changes in Working Capital 874 918
1. Net Cash provided by Operating Activities 1,388 410
2. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Investing Activities (15,945) (4,831)
3. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Financing Activities 19,950 3,857
4. Net Cash generated or (Used) during the period 5,394 (563)
D. RATIO ANALYSIS
1. Performance
a. Sales Growth (for the period) 352.3% N/A
b. Gross Profit Margin 12.6% 15.9%
c. Net Profit Margin 1.0% -8.1%
d. Cash Conversion Efficiency (FCFO adjusted for Working Capital/Sales) 4.7% 3.8%
e. Return on Equity [ Net Profit Margin * Asset Turnover * (Total Assets/Shareholders' Equity )] 5.2% N/A
2. Working Capital Management
a. Gross Working Capital (Average Days) 44 N/A
b. Net Working Capital (Average Days) 42 N/A
c. Current Ratio (Current Assets / Current Liabilities) 1.2 1.0
3. Coverages
a. EBITDA / Finance Cost 43.6 4.3
b. FCFO / Finance Cost+CMLTB+Excess STB 13.3 -1.9
c. Debt Payback (Total Borrowings+Excess STB) / (FCFO-Finance Cost) 6.6 -2.9
4. Capital Structure
a. Total Borrowings / (Total Borrowings+Shareholders' Equity) 29.8% 33.1%
b. Interest or Markup Payable (Days) 471.6 N/A
c. Entity Average Borrowing Rate 2.0% N/A

Jul-26

www.pacra.com

Jul-26

www.pacra.com

  1. Rating Team Statements
    1. Rating is just an opinion about the creditworthiness of the entity and does not constitute a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell any security of the entity rated or to buy, hold, or sell the security rated, as the case may be. (Chapter III; 14-3-(x))
    2. Conflict of Interest
      1. The Rating Team or any of their family members have no interest in this rating (Chapter III; 12-2-(j))
      2. PACRA, the analysts involved in the rating process, and members of its rating committee and their family members do not have any conflict of interest relating to the rating done by them (Chapter III; 12-2-(e) & (k))
      3. The analyst is not a substantial shareholder of the customer being rated by PACRA [Annexure F; d-(ii)]
      4. Explanation: for the purpose of the above clause, the term "family members" shall include only those family members who are dependent on the analyst and members of the rating committee.
  2. Restrictions
    1. No director, officer, or employee of PACRA communicates the information acquired by him for use for rating purposes to any other person, except where required under law to do so. (Chapter III; 10-(5))
    2. PACRA does not disclose or discuss with outside parties or make improper use of the non-public information which has come to its knowledge during a business relationship with the customer. (Chapter III; 10-7-(d))
    3. PACRA does not make proposals or recommendations regarding the activities of rated entities that could impact a credit rating of the entity subject to rating. (Chapter III; 10-7-(k))
  3. Conduct of Business
    1. PACRA fulfills its obligations in a fair, efficient, transparent, and ethical manner and renders high standards of services in performing its functions and obligations. (Chapter III; 11-A-(a))
    2. PACRA uses due care in the preparation of this Rating Report. Our information has been obtained from sources we consider to be reliable, but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. PACRA does not, in every instance, independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing this Rating Report. (Clause 11-(A)(p))
    3. PACRA prohibits its employees and analysts from soliciting money, gifts, or favors from anyone with whom PACRA conducts business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(q))
    4. PACRA ensures before the commencement of the rating process that an analyst or employee has not had a recent employment or other significant business or personal relationship with the rated entity that may cause or may be perceived as causing a conflict of interest. (Chapter III; 11-A-(r))
    5. PACRA maintains the principle of integrity in seeking rating business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(u))
    6. PACRA promptly investigates in the event of misconduct or a breach of the policies, procedures, and controls, and takes appropriate steps to rectify any weaknesses to prevent any recurrence, along with suitable punitive action against the responsible employee(s). (Chapter III; 11-B-(m))
  4. Independence & Conflict of Interest
    1. PACRA receives compensation from the entity being rated or any third party for the rating services it offers. The receipt of this compensation has no influence on PACRA’s opinions or other analytical processes. In all instances, PACRA is committed to preserving the objectivity, integrity, and independence of its ratings. Our relationship is governed by two distinct mandates: i) rating mandate - signed with the entity being rated or issuer of the debt instrument, and ii) fee mandate - signed with the payer, which can be different from the entity.
    2. PACRA does not provide consultancy/advisory services or other services to any of its customers or their associated companies and associated undertakings that are being rated or have been rated by it during the preceding three years, unless it has an adequate mechanism in place ensuring that the provision of such services does not lead to a conflict of interest situation with its rating activities. (Chapter III; 12-2-(d))
    3. PACRA discloses that no shareholder directly or indirectly holding 10% or more of the share capital of PACRA also holds directly or indirectly 10% or more of the share capital of the entity which is subject to rating or the entity which issued the instrument subject to rating by PACRA. (Chapter III; 12-2-(f))
    4. PACRA ensures that the rating assigned to an entity or instrument is not affected by the existence of a business relationship between PACRA and the entity or any other party, or the non-existence of such a relationship. (Chapter III; 12-2-(i))
    5. PACRA ensures that the analysts or any of their family members shall not buy, sell, or engage in any transaction in any security which falls in the analyst’s area of primary analytical responsibility. This clause, however, does not apply to investments in securities through collective investment schemes. (Chapter III; 12-2-(l))
    6. PACRA has established policies and procedures governing investments and trading in securities by its employees and for monitoring the same to prevent insider trading, market manipulation, or any other market abuse. (Chapter III; 11-B-(g))
  5. Monitoring and Review
    1. PACRA monitors all the outstanding ratings continuously, and any potential change therein due to any event associated with the issuer, the security arrangement, the industry, etc., is disseminated to the market immediately and in an effective manner after appropriate consultation with the entity/issuer. (Chapter III; 17-(a))
    2. PACRA reviews all the outstanding ratings periodically on an annual basis. Provided that public dissemination of annual review and in an instance of change in rating will be made. (Chapter III; 17-(b))
    3. PACRA initiates an immediate review of the outstanding rating upon becoming aware of any information that may reasonably be expected to result in downgrading of the rating. (Chapter III; 17-(c))
    4. PACRA engages with the issuer and the debt securities trustee to remain updated on all information pertaining to the rating of the entity/instrument. (Chapter III; 17-(d))
  6. Probability of Default
    1. PACRA’s Rating Scale reflects the expectation of credit risk. The highest rating has the lowest relative likelihood of default (i.e., probability). PACRA’s transition studies capture the historical performance behavior of a specific rating notch. Transition behavior of the assigned rating can be obtained from PACRA’s Transition Study available at our website. (www.pacra.com) However, the actual transition of rating may not follow the pattern observed in the past. (Chapter III; 14-3(f)(vii))
  7. Proprietary Information
    1. All information contained herein is considered proprietary by PACRA. Hence, none of the information in this document can be copied or otherwise reproduced, stored, or disseminated in whole or in part in any form or by any means whatsoever by any person without PACRA’s prior written consent.

Jul-26

www.pacra.com