Rating History
Dissemination Date Long-Term Rating Short-Term Rating Outlook Action Rating Watch
22-May-26 A A1 Stable Maintain -
22-May-25 A A1 Stable Maintain -
27-May-24 A A1 Stable Upgrade -
20-Jun-23 A- A1 Stable Maintain -
20-Jun-22 A- A1 Stable Maintain -
About the Entity

Olympia Chemicals Limited (the Company) was incorporated in Pakistan on January 01, 1995, as a public unlisted under the Companies Ordinance,1984 (now the Companies Act, 2017). The registered office of the Company is situated at 25-A Davis Road, Lahore, and manufacturing facilities are located at Unit (I) Warcha Tehsil Quaidabad, District Khushab Warcha and Unit (II) 45-KM Multan Road, Tehsil Pattoki, District Kasur. The Company is owned by the Monnoo family and its shareholding is divided among the family of Mr. Hamayun Monnoo (25%), Muhammad Shakil Monnoo and his family (36%) and Muhammad Khurshid Monnoo and his family (19.33%) and Muhammad Nasir Monnoo and his family (19.33%). Muhammad Shakil Monnoo is the CEO of the Company.

Rating Rationale

Olympia Chemicals Limited (“the Company”) is primarily engaged in the manufacturing and marketing of alkaline chemicals, their by-products, and detergents. Its flagship products include Soda Ash (Dense Grade), Soda Ash (Light Grade), and Refined Sodium Bicarbonate, which are produced under stringent quality control standards to meet both domestic and international demand. The Company currently operates with a total production capacity of 1,000 tons per day (TPD), including 160 TPD dedicated to food-grade Sodium Bicarbonate. The assigned ratings take comfort from the Company’s consistent performance which is closely aligned with its well-devised and prudent business strategy. The Company’s management remains focused on product diversification and has successfully entered the production of detergents, a value-added soda ash derivative. This segment is gaining momentum and has delivered double-digit growth, reflecting its potential as a meaningful contributor to future revenues. The soda ash industry in Pakistan is characterized by a duopoly, with Lucky Core Industries holding about ~60% of the market and Olympia Chemicals Ltd. maintaining a strong position with ~30%. The remaining 10% of demand is met through imports, primarily from Turkey and Kenya. Recent anti-dumping duties have provided relief to domestic producers, contributing to margin stabilization and supporting the protection of local market share. Domestic demand for soda ash remains closely linked with key downstream sectors, particularly glass manufacturing, detergents, specialty chemicals, and water treatment, with the glass segment representing the largest share of consumption. Pakistan’s glass industry is currently experiencing subdued growth amid slower construction activity, though demand from beverage and pharmaceutical packaging continues to provide moderate support. The soda ash industry remains strategically important for industrial expansion, while recent anti-dumping measures on imported soda ash are expected to support domestic manufacturers by easing pricing pressure, improving capacity utilization, and stabilizing industry margins over the medium term. The Group has a well-established business legacy, with a diversified portfolio that includes poultry and processed chicken, animal feed, chemical manufacturing, edible oil extraction, agriculture, fruit orchards, carpet weaving, and textile production. The Company’s board primarily consists of close family members, indicating potential for strengthening governance practices. During 1HFY26, the Company’s topline recorded a marginal decline of ~2.2%, primarily due to constrained volumetric growth amid subdued demand conditions. Profitability margins also witnessed slight compression across all levels, reflecting continued pressure on operating dynamics and cost absorption. The Company’s financial risk profile is considered sound, supported by comfortable coverage indicators, healthy cash flow generation, and prudent working capital management. The capital structure remains low leveraged, with borrowings primarily comprising concessionary long-term financing obtained under the TERF.

Key Rating Drivers

The ratings remain contingent upon the Company’s ability to sustain revenue growth and profitability while preserving market share. Ensuring adequate cash flow generation and coverage is essential. However, adherence to maintaining its debt metrics at an adequate level is a prerequisite.

Profile
Legal Structure

Olympia Chemicals Limited (Hereinafter referred to as 'the Company') was incorporated in Pakistan on January 01, 1995, as a public unlisted under the Companies Ordinance,1984 (now the Companies Act, 2017). The Company’s registered office is located at 25-A Davis Road, Lahore, Pakistan. It operates two manufacturing facilities: Unit I, situated in Warcha, Tehsil Quaidabad, District Khushab, and Unit II, located at 45-KM Multan Road, Tehsil Pattoki, District Kasur.


Background

Initially, Olympia Chemicals Limited began its operations with a production capacity of 120 tons per day (TPD) of soda ash. The Company then planned a series of expansions in different phases. In Phase I, the capacity was increased to 240 TPD. During the second phase, production was further enhanced to 300 TPD, and in the third phase, the Company achieved a capacity of 750 TPD. In the fourth phase of expansion, an additional 250 TPD was added, bringing the total production capacity to 1,000 TPD. This capacity also includes the production of 160 TPD of sodium bicarbonate. Olympia Chemicals Limited is recognized as a pioneer in producing refined sodium bicarbonate in Pakistan.


Operations

Olympia Chemicals Limited is primarily engaged in the manufacturing and marketing of alkaline chemicals, their by-products, and detergents. The Company’s main products include Soda Ash (Dense Grade), Soda Ash (Light Grade), and Refined Sodium Bicarbonate. These operations are supported by strict quality control systems to ensure consistency and compliance with industry standards. Raw material procurement and supply chain management are integral to maintaining uninterrupted production, while engineering and maintenance teams oversee plant efficiency and reliability. Safety, health, and environmental practices are embedded in daily operations, focusing on workplace safety, waste management, and emissions control. Strategic operations emphasize sustainability, digital integration, and continuous improvement, enabling Olympia Chemicals Limited to remain competitive and efficient in its industry.


Ownership
Ownership Structure

Olympia Chemicals Limited is a family-owned enterprise, with its ownership vested in the Monnoo family. The shareholding of the Company is distributed among four family groups. Mr. Hamayun Monnoo and his family hold 25% of the shares, reflecting a significant stake in the Company’s management and strategic direction. The largest portion of ownership, ~36%, belongs to Muhammad Shakil Monnoo and his family, giving them a leading role in the Company’s overall governance. Meanwhile, Muhammad Khurshid Monnoo and his family and Muhammad Nasir Monnoo and his family each hold ~19.33%, ensuring that both groups maintain equal representation in the ownership structure.


Stability

The operations of Olympia Chemicals Limited are predominantly overseen by Muhammad Shakil Monnoo, who has been an integral part of the organization since its inception in 1995. With nearly three decades of continuous association, he has emerged as a central figure in steering the Company’s growth and long-term success. A seasoned entrepreneur, Mr. Monnoo brings with him a wealth of knowledge and expertise, cultivated through years of hands-on experience across diverse industries. His broad skill set, combined with strategic foresight, enables him to address complex business challenges with confidence while simultaneously identifying and capitalizing on emerging opportunities. Renowned for his leadership qualities and visionary approach, Mr. Monnoo continues to play a decisive role in shaping the Company’s future direction. His ability to balance operational efficiency with innovation has been instrumental in maintaining Olympia Chemicals Limited’s competitive edge in the market. Under his guidance, the Company has not only expanded its production capacity but also strengthened its reputation as a pioneer in refined sodium bicarbonate manufacturing in Pakistan.


Business Acumen

The Company’s owners have accumulated decades of experience in the chemicals industry, giving them a strong foundation of technical knowledge and practical insights. Over the years, they have developed a thorough understanding of industry trends, operational challenges, and customer requirements, which has guided the Company’s growth and stability. Their approach emphasizes consistent quality, innovation, and adaptability. This has enabled the Company to respond effectively to market fluctuations, regulatory changes, and technological advancements. By investing in modern manufacturing practices and research initiatives, the Company has maintained competitiveness and ensured that its products meet recognized standards. One of the Company’s notable achievements is its position as the second-largest manufacturer of Soda Ash products in Pakistan. This standing reflects both production capacity and the ability to deliver reliable products that serve diverse applications, including glass manufacturing, detergents, textiles, and other chemical processes. The Company’s output supports both domestic industries and international markets, contributing to wider economic activity. In addition to production, the Company places importance on sustainable practices, workforce development, and customer relationships. These priorities have helped establish its reputation as a dependable participant in the chemicals sector. By combining long-term experience with forward-looking strategies, the Company continues to play a role in the ongoing development of the industry.


Financial Strength

The group maintains a broad and diversified business portfolio, with established operations in poultry, animal feeds, and frozen foods. This diversification reflects a deliberate strategy to engage with multiple industries, thereby reducing exposure to sector-specific risks and creating opportunities for sustained growth. Its financial position is recognized as strong, supported by consistent performance and prudent investment practices. This foundation enables the group to maintain ongoing operations, pursue expansion initiatives, and explore new ventures with confidence. The ability to allocate resources effectively across different business areas demonstrates resilience and adaptability in the face of changing market conditions. Its financial position is recognized as strong, supported by consistent performance and prudent investment practices. This foundation enables the group to maintain ongoing operations, pursue expansion initiatives, and explore new ventures with confidence. The ability to allocate resources effectively across different business areas demonstrates resilience and adaptability in the face of changing market conditions. Such financial strength contributes to the group’s long-term stability and enhances its capacity to respond to evolving consumer demands, regulatory requirements, and global industry trends. By balancing diversification with financial discipline, the group continues to reinforce its role as a reliable participant in multiple sectors of the economy.


Governance
Board Structure

The Company’s board is composed of nine members, each contributing varied professional and personal experiences to the leadership structure. A distinctive feature of this board is that all members are close family, which reflects a strong sense of unity, shared values, and collective purpose in guiding the organization’s strategic direction. This family-centered composition has fostered cohesion and alignment in decision-making. At present, the board is chaired by Muhammad Shakil Monnoo, whose leadership underscores the family’s active involvement in shaping the Company’s long-term vision. His role highlights the importance placed on continuity and the preservation of family-led governance traditions. However, the current structure also presents an opportunity for enhancement. The absence of independent directors limits the diversity of perspectives available to the board. Incorporating independent members could strengthen governance practices by introducing external viewpoints, improving oversight, and aligning the Company’s governance framework with internationally recognized best practices. By balancing family unity with independent perspectives, the board could further enhance transparency, accountability, and strategic adaptability, ensuring that its leadership remains resilient and responsive to evolving industry and regulatory demands.


Members’ Profile

Muhammad Shakil Monnoo serves as the Chief Executive Officer, bringing more than three decades of business experience to the organization. His leadership is informed by deep industry knowledge and strategic insight, which guide the Company’s overall direction and long-term planning. The remaining board members are accomplished professionals with diverse backgrounds and expertise across various fields. Collectively, they contribute a wide range of skills, perspectives, and practical knowledge that strengthen the board’s ability to address complex challenges and adapt to changing market conditions. This combination of seasoned leadership and varied professional experience supports a dynamic approach to governance and operations. It enables the group to balance continuity with adaptability, ensuring that decisions are informed by both long-standing industry understanding and fresh perspectives from different disciplines.


Board Effectiveness

During the IHFY26, the board convened on two occasions, reflecting its commitment to governance and strategic oversight. Attendance was strong, with the majority of members actively participating, which demonstrates an organized and engaged leadership approach. These meetings provided a platform for reviewing performance, discussing key initiatives, and ensuring alignment with the Company’s long-term objectives. In addition to its formal sessions, the board has established a management committee known as the Plant Operational Review Committee. This committee is composed of senior operational leaders, including the General Manager of the plant site, the Manager of Mechanical & Maintenance, the Manager of the Powerhouse, the Manager of Production, and the Manager of Administration. The committee’s mandate is to oversee operational excellence, monitor plant performance, and address plant-specific challenges. By involving managers directly responsible for critical functions, the board ensures that operational issues are addressed promptly and effectively. This structure highlights a proactive approach to governance, with a clear emphasis on efficiency, accountability, and seamless plant operations.


Financial Transparency

The Company’s external audit is conducted by UHY Hassan Naeem & Co., Chartered Accountants, a firm that is QCR-rated and holds an “A” category position on the State Bank of Pakistan’s panel of auditors. This classification reflects the firm’s recognized standing and compliance with regulatory standards. For the financial year ended June 30, 2025, the auditors issued an unqualified opinion on the Company’s financial statements.


Management
Organizational Structure

The Company has established a well-defined management structure designed to promote efficiency, clarity, and accountability across its operations. This framework is organized into functional departments, each with specific responsibilities and clearly delineated roles. Such an arrangement ensures that decision-making processes are streamlined, coordination between departments is strengthened, and accountability is maintained at every level. By assigning responsibilities in a structured manner, the Company enables employees to understand their objectives and contributions within the broader organizational context. This clarity supports smoother workflows, reduces duplication of effort, and enhances overall operational effectiveness. The management structure also facilitates better communication and collaboration among departments, allowing the Company to respond more effectively to challenges and adapt to evolving business needs. In doing so, it provides a foundation for consistent performance and supports the long-term sustainability of the organization.


Management Team

The Company is supported by a team of experienced professionals who contribute diverse expertise and perspectives to its operations. At the forefront of this team is Mr. Masood Khaliq, the Chief Operating Officer, whose career spans more than five decades. His extensive background reflects versatility and a deep understanding of industry practices, providing continuity and strategic guidance to the organization’s operational framework. Complementing this leadership is Mr. Irfan Majeed Chughtai, a Chartered Accountant with over 44 years of professional experience. His financial expertise and strategic insight strengthen the Company’s financial management and planning, ensuring sound decision-making in areas critical to long-term sustainability. Other members of the management team, each seasoned in their respective fields, contribute meaningfully under the structured guidance of departmental heads, the COO, and the Chief Financial Officer. This collective experience supports effective coordination, accountability, and adaptability across the Company’s operations. The management framework, built on clear leadership roles and professional expertise, reflects the Company’s emphasis on operational discipline and informed decision-making. It provides a foundation for consistent performance and reinforces the organization’s ability to respond to evolving industry demands.


Effectiveness

The Company has established a central management committee to ensure effective coordination across its operations. Serving as the apex decision-making body, the committee is composed of senior management representatives, underscoring its pivotal role in guiding the organization toward its strategic objectives. The committee convenes on a monthly basis under the leadership of the chairman, providing a structured forum to evaluate performance, address critical operational issues, and set priorities for the coming period. These regular meetings reinforce accountability and ensure that strategic decisions are closely aligned with the Company’s long-term goals. Supporting the committee’s work are key functional departments, including Purchase, Finance, and Credit, each tasked with achieving defined monthly targets. This integration of departmental responsibilities into the committee’s oversight framework strengthens operational discipline and ensures that performance objectives are consistently monitored. By combining strategic oversight with departmental accountability, the management committee provides a mechanism for maintaining operational efficiency, enhancing coordination, and ensuring that the Company remains responsive to evolving business demands.


MIS

The Company has integrated Microsoft Dynamics ERP into its operations, reflecting its commitment to utilizing advanced technology for effective information management. This enterprise resource planning system provides a centralized platform that streamlines reporting processes and ensures the smooth flow of information across all levels of the organization. A key feature of the ERP is its ability to generate customized Management Information System (MIS) and dashboard reports tailored to the needs of the board and senior management. These reports deliver timely and relevant data, supporting informed decision-making and enhancing oversight of both strategic and operational matters. Beyond reporting, the ERP’s robust functionalities strengthen internal controls and improve accountability. By standardizing processes and providing real-time visibility into operations, the system enhances efficiency and supports governance standards. This integration of technology into management practices enables the Company to maintain operational discipline while adapting to evolving business requirements.


Control Environment

The Company has established a strong control environment, supported by a robust internal control and quality assurance framework, covering its financial reporting, business planning, and production processes. These controls are designed to ensure accuracy, reliability, and timeliness of information, while promoting operational efficiency and compliance with internal policies and regulatory requirements. The financial reporting and planning functions are subject to structured review and oversight mechanisms, enabling effective monitoring of performance against defined targets and early identification of variances. Similarly, the production processes are governed by well‑defined standard operating procedures (SOPs) and quality checks to maintain consistency, efficiency, and product reliability. In addition, Olympia Chemicals has entered into technical collaboration agreements with internationally recognized firms, which provide access to advanced technologies, best practices, and industry expertise. These collaborations play a key role in ensuring that international quality standards are consistently adhered to, enhancing product quality, process optimization, and overall competitiveness in both domestic and export markets. Collectively, the Company’s strong control environment, disciplined internal processes, and international technical partnerships support effective risk management, operational resilience, and sustainable long‑term performance.


Business Risk
Industry Dynamics

During the period under review, the domestic Soda Ash market remained under stress, reflecting weak demand conditions and an adverse macroeconomic environment. Domestic sales declined by ~11% compared to the same period last year (SPLY), mainly due to subdued downstream demand amid reduced purchasing power and lower industrial activity. Export sales declined by ~36% year‑on‑year, as weakening global commodity prices compressed margins and curtailed export volumes. In addition to demand‑side pressures, dumped imports—particularly from Turkey and Kenya—intensified competitive challenges, negatively impacting domestic manufacturers’ pricing power and sales volumes. In response, anti‑dumping duties were imposed in January 2026 on soda ash imports from Turkey (ranging from 3.49% to 5.58%) and Kenya (12.54%), following a preliminary determination that such imports had caused material injury to the local industry. These duties, initially imposed for four months, are expected to provide temporary relief and structural support to domestic producers by restoring pricing discipline and reducing unfair competition. Despite these regulatory measures, the domestic economic environment remained challenging, characterized by high inflation, tight monetary conditions, and weak construction‑sector activity. Consequently, the Soda Ash industry continued to operate below optimal capacity utilization levels. In FY25, total domestic Soda Ash demand declined by around 4% to 590,000 tons, while installed industry capacity stands at 910,000 tons, indicating a sizeable capacity overhang. Soda Ash production depends on key raw materials such as sodium chloride (salt), limestone, coal, and ammonia, exposing producers to energy‑ and input‑cost volatility. Within Pakistan’s Large‑Scale Manufacturing (LSM) index, Soda Ash accounts for around 0.1% of the chemicals segment, reflecting its modest statistical weight, despite being an essential industrial input. Soda Ash is a critical raw material used primarily in the manufacturing of glass, detergents, chemicals, and various industrial products. It is an anhydrous white powder or granular material, produced in light and dense grades, each catering to different industrial applications. Demand for Soda Ash remains closely linked to construction and glass industry performance, which remained weak during the reviewed period. In contrast, demand for sodium bicarbonate (food grade) remained relatively resilient, supported by sustained consumption from the poultry, confectionery, and food processing sectors, partially offsetting weakness in industrial demand. Currently, nearly 90% of domestic Soda Ash demand is met through local production, with imports now reduced to a minimal level following regulatory interventions. Looking ahead, the industry is expected to benefit from export opportunities, as sufficient installed capacity exists to cater to regional and international markets. Should global prices stabilize and anti‑dumping measures remain in force, exports could play a meaningful role in improving capacity utilization, supporting margins, and strengthening the long‑term outlook for domestic Soda Ash manufacturers.


Relative Position

The Soda Ash market in Pakistan is highly concentrated, with Lucky Core Industries holding an estimated ~60% market share, followed by Olympia Chemicals with around ~30%, while the remaining ~10% of domestic demand is met through imports. Within the local manufacturing landscape, Olympia Chemicals ranks as the second‑largest producer of Soda Ash, positioning the Company as a key participant in the industry. In terms of potential new competition, a prominent textile group announced on April 27, 2023 that its wholly‑owned subsidiary, Sapphire Chemicals (Private) Limited, intends to establish a Soda Ash manufacturing facility with an annual capacity of 220,000 tons at a proposed plant in Khushab. The subsidiary’s scope of operations includes the manufacturing, processing, refinement, distribution, import, export, and trading of a wide range of chemical products. However, the proposed project has not yet commenced production. Additionally, the said local business group has obtained approval under the Special Economic Zone (SEZ) framework for the development of a new Soda Ash manufacturing facility, which is expected to become operational within the next three years. Despite regulatory approvals, the project continues to face several execution challenges, most notably water supply constraints in the project area, which may affect timelines and feasibility. Overall, barriers to entry in the Soda Ash industry remain strong, given the requirement for substantial capital investment, long project gestation periods, infrastructure dependencies, and access to critical inputs such as water and energy. These factors limit the threat of rapid new capacity additions and support the competitive positioning of existing players. Furthermore, the export potential for Soda Ash remains strong, supported by steady regional and international demand. This provides an opportunity for established domestic manufacturers to diversify revenue streams, enhance capacity utilization, and pursue growth in international markets, thereby strengthening long‑term industry prospects.


Revenues

During IHFY26, the Company’s top‑line revenue increased moderately, reaching PKR 10,997 million, compared to PKR 22,496 million in FY25. The Company’s revenue base remains well diversified, operating across both business‑to‑business (B2B) and business‑to‑consumer (B2C) segments. Consumer exposure is primarily driven by its detergents business, which provides stability and helps mitigate concentration risk. This diversified mix supports resilience across varying market cycles and enhances the sustainability of earnings. Within the product portfolio, Soda Ash continues to be the largest revenue‑contributing segment. As a critical input for multiple downstream industries, Soda Ash benefits from strong demand fundamentals and broad end‑use applications. Its contribution not only underpins the Company’s top‑line growth but also reinforces its strategic positioning within the industry, serving as a cornerstone of long‑term competitiveness.


Margins

During IHFY26, the Company experienced a contraction in profitability margins, largely driven by prevailing cost‑push inflationary pressures. The gross margin declined to ~12.4%, compared to ~17% in FY25, reflecting higher input and operating costs that could not be fully transferred to customers. Similarly, the operating margin fell to around ~9% in IHFY26, down from ~14% in FY25, as elevated raw material prices, utility expenses, and other operating overheads weighed on performance. On the financing side, however, the Company reported a notable improvement. Finance costs decreased significantly to PKR 112 million in IHFY26, compared to PKR 332 million in FY25. This reduction highlights a more efficient financing structure during the period. Consequently, net profit for IHFY26 was recorded at PKR 735 million, compared to PKR 2,177 million in FY25. The year‑on‑year decline in net profitability was primarily attributable to margin compression resulting from inflationary cost pressures, despite the benefit of reduced finance costs.


Sustainability

The Company operates in products that constitute essential raw materials for a wide range of downstream industries, including sectors where continuity of supply is critical for uninterrupted production. This diversified end‑use base reduces dependency on any single industry and provides a strong foundation for business stability, resilience, and long‑term growth, even during periods of economic volatility. Management follows a well‑defined and structured business plan, developed on the basis of realistic market assumptions, demand projections, and operating conditions. The planning framework incorporates prudent risk assessment, alignment with industry trends, and disciplined resource allocation to ensure sustainable performance. To ensure effective execution, the Company has established a robust performance monitoring mechanism, under which actual operating and financial results are reviewed against planned targets on a regular and periodic basis. These reviews are conducted by senior management and focus on key parameters such as volumes, margins, working capital, and cash flows. Any material variances are promptly analyzed, and corrective actions are implemented in a timely manner, thereby strengthening operational control and strategic oversight. Overall, this combination of essential product positioning, diversified end‑market exposure, disciplined planning, and close performance monitoring provides the Company with a strong platform for sustainable growth and effective risk management.


Financial Risk
Working capital

During IHFY26, the Company’s inventory days increased to 62 days, compared to 52 days in FY25, reflecting a buildup in inventory levels during the period. At the same time, trade receivable days improved to 36 days, down from 40 days in FY25, indicating stronger collection efficiency and tighter credit control. As a result of these movements, the Company’s gross working capital days rose to 98 days in IHFY26, compared to 92 days in FY25, primarily driven by higher inventory holding. On the payables side, trade payable days increased to 43 days, up from 40 days in FY25, providing partial offset through improved supplier credit terms. Consequently, net working capital days stood at 55 days in IHFY26, compared to 52 days in FY25, reflecting a modest increase in net funds locked in working capital, largely attributable to elevated inventory levels despite improvements in receivable management and slightly extended payables.


Coverages

The Company reported operating cash flows of PKR 1,223 million during IHFY26, in FY25 it was reported at PKR 3,228 million. Despite the contraction in operating cash flows, the Company’s financial resilience is underscored by its strong interest coverage ratio. The ratio improved significantly to ~10.9x in IHFY26, compared to ~8.2x in FY25. This enhancement demonstrates the Company’s strengthened capacity to meet interest obligations, supported by prudent financial management and operational efficiency. Overall, while cash flow generation has weakened, the improvement in coverage metrics provides comfort regarding the Company’s ability to withstand financial pressures and maintain stability in its debt servicing profile.


Capitalization

The Company’s capital structure remains moderately leveraged. As of IHFY26, overall leveraging stood at ~17.2%, compared to 14.5% in FY25, indicating a gradual increase in financial gearing. A notable development during the period was the significant rise in short‑term borrowings, which escalated to nearly ~34% in IHFY26 from ~10.8% in FY25. This sharp increase reflects greater reliance on short‑term funding sources, thereby heightening liquidity risk and exposing the Company to refinancing pressures. While the leverage position remains moderate, the shift toward short‑term debt underscores the importance of prudent financial management. Sustaining a balanced debt profile and strengthening cash flow generation will be critical to maintaining stability in the Company’s capital structure going forward.


 
 

May-26

www.pacra.com


(PKR mln)


Dec-25
6M
Jun-25
12M
Jun-24
12M
Jun-23
12M
Management Audited Audited Audited
A. BALANCE SHEET
1. Non-Current Assets 13,635 14,038 14,027 11,576
2. Investments 226 226 823 226
3. Related Party Exposure 3,572 2,302 36 15
4. Current Assets 10,127 10,217 9,137 9,505
a. Inventories 3,412 4,065 2,392 2,343
b. Trade Receivables 2,394 1,947 2,940 1,991
5. Total Assets 27,560 26,783 24,023 21,322
6. Current Liabilities 5,122 5,728 5,827 5,308
a. Trade Payables 2,608 2,552 2,387 1,680
7. Borrowings 3,319 2,582 2,427 2,995
8. Related Party Exposure 194 198 218 218
9. Non-Current Liabilities 1,983 1,947 1,279 1,034
10. Net Assets 16,942 16,329 14,272 11,767
11. Shareholders' Equity 16,942 16,329 14,272 11,767
B. INCOME STATEMENT
1. Sales 10,997 22,496 21,892 18,461
a. Cost of Good Sold (9,630) (18,640) (17,483) (13,539)
2. Gross Profit 1,367 3,856 4,410 4,922
a. Operating Expenses (408) (736) (642) (506)
3. Operating Profit 959 3,119 3,768 4,416
a. Non Operating Income or (Expense) 110 140 (6) (96)
4. Profit or (Loss) before Interest and Tax 1,069 3,259 3,763 4,319
a. Total Finance Cost (112) (332) (396) (103)
b. Taxation (222) (750) (741) (1,012)
6. Net Income Or (Loss) 735 2,177 2,626 3,204
C. CASH FLOW STATEMENT
a. Free Cash Flows from Operations (FCFO) 1,223 3,228 3,272 4,216
b. Net Cash from Operating Activities before Working Capital Changes 1,118 2,941 2,929 4,162
c. Changes in Working Capital 70 (947) 1,938 (1,031)
1. Net Cash provided by Operating Activities 1,187 1,995 4,867 3,132
2. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Investing Activities (1,552) (1,899) (3,635) (4,689)
3. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Financing Activities 615 (406) (870) 2,154
4. Net Cash generated or (Used) during the period 251 (310) 362 597
D. RATIO ANALYSIS
1. Performance
a. Sales Growth (for the period) -2.2% 2.8% 18.6% 0.0%
b. Gross Profit Margin 12.4% 17.1% 20.1% 26.7%
c. Net Profit Margin 6.7% 9.7% 12.0% 17.4%
d. Cash Conversion Efficiency (FCFO adjusted for Working Capital/Sales) 11.8% 10.1% 23.8% 17.3%
e. Return on Equity [ Net Profit Margin * Asset Turnover * (Total Assets/Shareholders' Equity )] 8.8% 14.2% 20.2% 27.2%
2. Working Capital Management
a. Gross Working Capital (Average Days) 98 92 81 86
b. Net Working Capital (Average Days) 55 52 47 52
c. Current Ratio (Current Assets / Current Liabilities) 2.0 1.8 1.6 1.8
3. Coverages
a. EBITDA / Finance Cost 15.2 11.2 13.7 85.9
b. FCFO / Finance Cost+CMLTB+Excess STB 4.4 3.4 4.3 19.6
c. Debt Payback (Total Borrowings+Excess STB) / (FCFO-Finance Cost) 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7
4. Capital Structure
a. Total Borrowings / (Total Borrowings+Shareholders' Equity) 17.2% 14.5% 15.6% 21.4%
b. Interest or Markup Payable (Days) 66.6 27.5 33.9 184.4
c. Entity Average Borrowing Rate 7.0% 13.6% 11.8% 1.6%

May-26

www.pacra.com

May-26

www.pacra.com

  1. Rating Team Statements
    1. Rating is just an opinion about the creditworthiness of the entity and does not constitute a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell any security of the entity rated or to buy, hold, or sell the security rated, as the case may be. (Chapter III; 14-3-(x))
    2. Conflict of Interest
      1. The Rating Team or any of their family members have no interest in this rating (Chapter III; 12-2-(j))
      2. PACRA, the analysts involved in the rating process, and members of its rating committee and their family members do not have any conflict of interest relating to the rating done by them (Chapter III; 12-2-(e) & (k))
      3. The analyst is not a substantial shareholder of the customer being rated by PACRA [Annexure F; d-(ii)]
      4. Explanation: for the purpose of the above clause, the term "family members" shall include only those family members who are dependent on the analyst and members of the rating committee.
  2. Restrictions
    1. No director, officer, or employee of PACRA communicates the information acquired by him for use for rating purposes to any other person, except where required under law to do so. (Chapter III; 10-(5))
    2. PACRA does not disclose or discuss with outside parties or make improper use of the non-public information which has come to its knowledge during a business relationship with the customer. (Chapter III; 10-7-(d))
    3. PACRA does not make proposals or recommendations regarding the activities of rated entities that could impact a credit rating of the entity subject to rating. (Chapter III; 10-7-(k))
  3. Conduct of Business
    1. PACRA fulfills its obligations in a fair, efficient, transparent, and ethical manner and renders high standards of services in performing its functions and obligations. (Chapter III; 11-A-(a))
    2. PACRA uses due care in the preparation of this Rating Report. Our information has been obtained from sources we consider to be reliable, but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. PACRA does not, in every instance, independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing this Rating Report. (Clause 11-(A)(p))
    3. PACRA prohibits its employees and analysts from soliciting money, gifts, or favors from anyone with whom PACRA conducts business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(q))
    4. PACRA ensures before the commencement of the rating process that an analyst or employee has not had a recent employment or other significant business or personal relationship with the rated entity that may cause or may be perceived as causing a conflict of interest. (Chapter III; 11-A-(r))
    5. PACRA maintains the principle of integrity in seeking rating business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(u))
    6. PACRA promptly investigates in the event of misconduct or a breach of the policies, procedures, and controls, and takes appropriate steps to rectify any weaknesses to prevent any recurrence, along with suitable punitive action against the responsible employee(s). (Chapter III; 11-B-(m))
  4. Independence & Conflict of Interest
    1. PACRA receives compensation from the entity being rated or any third party for the rating services it offers. The receipt of this compensation has no influence on PACRA’s opinions or other analytical processes. In all instances, PACRA is committed to preserving the objectivity, integrity, and independence of its ratings. Our relationship is governed by two distinct mandates: i) rating mandate - signed with the entity being rated or issuer of the debt instrument, and ii) fee mandate - signed with the payer, which can be different from the entity.
    2. PACRA does not provide consultancy/advisory services or other services to any of its customers or their associated companies and associated undertakings that are being rated or have been rated by it during the preceding three years, unless it has an adequate mechanism in place ensuring that the provision of such services does not lead to a conflict of interest situation with its rating activities. (Chapter III; 12-2-(d))
    3. PACRA discloses that no shareholder directly or indirectly holding 10% or more of the share capital of PACRA also holds directly or indirectly 10% or more of the share capital of the entity which is subject to rating or the entity which issued the instrument subject to rating by PACRA. (Chapter III; 12-2-(f))
    4. PACRA ensures that the rating assigned to an entity or instrument is not affected by the existence of a business relationship between PACRA and the entity or any other party, or the non-existence of such a relationship. (Chapter III; 12-2-(i))
    5. PACRA ensures that the analysts or any of their family members shall not buy, sell, or engage in any transaction in any security which falls in the analyst’s area of primary analytical responsibility. This clause, however, does not apply to investments in securities through collective investment schemes. (Chapter III; 12-2-(l))
    6. PACRA has established policies and procedures governing investments and trading in securities by its employees and for monitoring the same to prevent insider trading, market manipulation, or any other market abuse. (Chapter III; 11-B-(g))
  5. Monitoring and Review
    1. PACRA monitors all the outstanding ratings continuously, and any potential change therein due to any event associated with the issuer, the security arrangement, the industry, etc., is disseminated to the market immediately and in an effective manner after appropriate consultation with the entity/issuer. (Chapter III; 17-(a))
    2. PACRA reviews all the outstanding ratings periodically on an annual basis. Provided that public dissemination of annual review and in an instance of change in rating will be made. (Chapter III; 17-(b))
    3. PACRA initiates an immediate review of the outstanding rating upon becoming aware of any information that may reasonably be expected to result in downgrading of the rating. (Chapter III; 17-(c))
    4. PACRA engages with the issuer and the debt securities trustee to remain updated on all information pertaining to the rating of the entity/instrument. (Chapter III; 17-(d))
  6. Probability of Default
    1. PACRA’s Rating Scale reflects the expectation of credit risk. The highest rating has the lowest relative likelihood of default (i.e., probability). PACRA’s transition studies capture the historical performance behavior of a specific rating notch. Transition behavior of the assigned rating can be obtained from PACRA’s Transition Study available at our website. (www.pacra.com) However, the actual transition of rating may not follow the pattern observed in the past. (Chapter III; 14-3(f)(vii))
  7. Proprietary Information
    1. All information contained herein is considered proprietary by PACRA. Hence, none of the information in this document can be copied or otherwise reproduced, stored, or disseminated in whole or in part in any form or by any means whatsoever by any person without PACRA’s prior written consent.

May-26

www.pacra.com