Rating History
Dissemination Date Long-Term Rating Short-Term Rating Outlook Action Rating Watch
24-Apr-26 A- A2 Stable Maintain -
25-Apr-25 A- A2 Stable Maintain -
26-Apr-24 A- A2 Stable Maintain -
28-Apr-23 A- A2 Stable Maintain -
29-Apr-22 A- A2 Stable Upgrade -
About the Entity

PSL was incorporated as a private limited company in 1984. In 1987, the Company was converted into a public limited company and was listed on the Pakistan Stock Exchange. The Company provides complete packaging solutions through the production and sale of PET Resin at an installed capacity of 28,000MT per annum, PET Preform at an installed capacity of 52,000 Octabins per annum and Plastic Closures and Metal Crowns at an installed capacity of 558,570 cartons per annum. PSL is primarily owned by the Yaqoob Karim family, which holds ~65.5% stake in the Company. The key shareholders include Mr. Noman Yaqoob (~26.4%) and Mr. Yaqoob Haji Karim (~23.1%), while the remaining shares are held by other family members and the general public.

Rating Rationale

The assigned ratings of Pakistan Synthetics Limited ("PSL" or the "Company") reflects a strong sponsor profile, satisfactory positioning in niche packaging segments, and an adequate financial risk profile. The ratings derive strength from a sound governance architecture, evidenced by an internal control framework and direct Board oversight of the internal audit function, supported by an experienced management team. PSL operates across plastic and crown caps, PET resin, and PET preforms, commanding a leading market share in caps while maintaining a modest presence in PET resin. The rating horizon is tempered by sectoral headwinds, including cost-push inflation in utilities, geopolitical-driven supply chain uncertainties, and working capital pressures linked to reliance on imported PET derivatives. Management has undertaken a strategic redirection of procurement flows toward alternative sourcing destinations, notably the United States, to mitigate supply disruptions. While this ensures availability and diversification, it has extended shipment lead times, resulting in a structural elongation of the working capital cycle and higher reliance on short-term borrowings. Operational performance remained mixed in FY25: caps utilization improved to ~97% (FY24: ~79%), and preforms to ~69% (FY24: ~63%), while PET resin declined to ~81% (FY24: ~95%) due to subdued domestic offtake and pricing pressures. Revenue mix remained stable, led by PET resin (~37%), followed by preforms (~34%) and caps (~29%). Topline grew to PKR 16,872mln (FY24: PKR 13,799mln); however, margins remained constrained, with PAT marginally rising to PKR 367mln (FY24: PKR 348mln). During 6MFY25, the Company recorded a topline of PKR 5.99bln (6MFY24: PKR 6.57bln), with gross profit declining to PKR 786mln (6MFY24: PKR 975mln), reflecting the transmission lag between input costs and pricing. Disciplined cost management provided partial support. PAT improved to PKR 219mln (6MFY24: PKR 169mln), supported by non-operational tailwinds, including ECL reversals and lower finance costs, though equity-accounted losses from an associate (PKR 53.9mln) continue to weigh on profitability. Overall, PSL’s financial risk profile remains adequate, supported by a strengthened equity base (PKR 4.85bln). Coverage metrics have improved but remain sensitive to margin volatility, working capital intensity, and associate losses.

Key Rating Drivers

Going forward, the rating trajectory will hinge on the timely commissioning and ramp-up of the Muridke expansion, with effective conversion of incremental capacity into sustainable revenues and cash flows. Maintaining margin integrity amid input cost volatility will remain critical. Execution risks around demand absorption and pricing discipline will be key sensitivities. Any delays in ramp-up, weaker utilization, or margin dilution may exert pressure on the rating.

Profile
Legal Structure

Pakistan Synthetics Limited ("PSL" or "the Company") is a Pakistan Stock Exchange-listed manufacturer of PET Resin, PET Preform, Plastic Caps, and Metal Crowns, with manufacturing facilities located in Hub, Balochistan, and Port Qasim, Karachi. The Company maintains a strong position in the domestic plastic closures market, while holding a moderate competitive position in the PET Resin and Preform segments. PSL was incorporated on November 18, 1984, as a private company limited by shares, subsequently converted into a public limited company on December 30, 1987, and listed on the Pakistan Stock Exchange on June 27, 1995.


Background

Established as part of the Al-Karam Group — historically one of Pakistan's leading industrial conglomerates with diversified interests spanning textile, financial institutions, and consumer products — PSL has undergone strategic portfolio rationalization over the past decade. The Company discontinued its Polymer Staple Fibre operations in 2015 and, by leveraging the existing plant infrastructure, pivoted toward PET Resin manufacturing, commencing commercial production in October 2016. This downstream migration into the beverage packaging value chain has proven strategically prescient, positioning PSL as a vertically integrated, one-window packaging solutions provider for multinational bottlers and domestic FMCG players.


Operations

PSL's operational footprint comprises two manufacturing sites: Hub Industrial Trading Estate in District Lasbella, Balochistan (where the majority of PET Resin, Preform, and Closures manufacturing is concentrated), and Plot A-5, NWIZ, Port Qasim, Karachi. Installed annual capacities stand at approximately 558,570 cartons for Plastic and Crown Caps, 28,000 metric tonnes for PET Resin, and 52,000 Octabins for PET Preform. During FY2025, the Company incurred capital expenditure of approximately PKR 964 million, a significant acceleration from PKR 132 million in FY2024, directed toward plant and machinery upgrades — including the installation of solar panels — and civil works, signaling management's commitment to BMR-led capacity optimization and energy cost mitigation. In addition, the Company is planning geographical expansion through the establishment of a new facility in Muridke, Punjab, focused on the production of Crown Caps, Plastic Caps, and PET Preforms. This expansion is aimed at strengthening market reach in the northern region, improving customer proximity, and contributing to potential logistics and cost efficiencies.


Ownership
Ownership Structure

The Yaqoob Karim family retains concentrated control over PSL, with the founding family holding approximately 65.5% of total shares as of June 30, 2025, based on disclosed shareholding data in the Annual Report. The two dominant shareholders are Mr. Noman Yaqoob (~26.4%) and Mr. Yaqoob Haji Karim (~23.1%), with Mr. Anis Yaqoob holding approximately 15.9% — the latter representing shares held in the combined family block. The public float accounts for a moderate portion of the outstanding shares, while institutional holders — including insurance companies, mutual funds, and joint stock companies — represent a comparatively small minority. The National Investment Trust (NIT) and related entities hold a nominal stake.


Stability

The concentrated family ownership structure provides a high degree of ownership stability. While concentrated ownership is a governance consideration in certain analytical frameworks, in the context of PSL it is mitigated by the long-tenured, operationally experienced management team and the family's demonstrated commitment to sustained capital investment. We note no evidence of material ownership changes or extraordinary intra-family transactions that would introduce ownership risk to the rating.


Business Acumen

The Yaqoob Karim family brings multi-decade industrial experience, with the CEO, Mr. Yaqoob Haji Karim, holding concurrent board-level roles at Al-Karam Textile Mills (Pvt.) Limited and Amna Industries (Pvt.) Limited, evidencing active cross-sector industrial engagement. The family's track record of adaptive strategy — notably the plant conversion from staple fibre to PET Resin — reflects an ability to reallocate capital decisively in response to structural market shifts. This constrains downside risks from strategic misalignment and is a credit-supportive factor.


Financial Strength

Pakistan Synthetics is owned by a strong business family. The members of the sponsoring family hold shares and directorships of many companies.


Governance
Board Structure

The Company's board is comprised of eight members and is dominated by Haji Karim family. There are three Independent Directors, including one female Director,  three Non-Executive Directors, and two Executive Directors, including the CEO, on the board.


Members’ Profile

Chairman Mr. Khurshid Akhtar, an independent director, continues in his role, bringing over five years of board-level experience and providing effective leadership to the Board. Mr. Noman Yaqoob, an Executive Director, contributes actively to Board deliberations and plays a significant role across key committees, supporting informed decision-making. Among the remaining members, Mr. Abid Umer, a seasoned Non-Executive Director, offers valuable insight backed by his extensive experience and long-standing association with the Board. Mr. Mubbashr Amin strengthens governance through his active involvement in multiple committees, enhancing oversight functions. Mr. Tayab Rafiq Balagamwala, a Non-Executive Director, brings a fresh perspective and sound professional background to Board discussions. The independent directors, Mr. Faraz Younus Bandukda and Ms. Sadaf Shabbir, further reinforce Board independence and diversity, with Mr. Bandukda contributing through committee participation, including Audit and HR, while Ms. Shabbir supports balanced and inclusive governance practices. Overall, the Board reflects an adequate mix of experience and independence, supporting effective governance.


Board Effectiveness

The Board convened five meetings during FY25 with full attendance by most directors. Four governance committees remain operative — Audit Committee (met four times), HR and Remuneration Committee (met once), Risk Management Committee (met four times), and Nomination Committee (met once) — each functioning in adherence to formally documented terms of reference.


Financial Transparency

BDO Ebrahim & Co., Chartered Accountants, continue as external auditors and have issued an unqualified opinion on the financial statements for the year ended June 30, 2025. The firm is QCR-rated by ICAP and classified in the 'A' Category of SBP's panel of auditors, ensuring audit quality commensurate with a listed manufacturing entity.


Management
Organizational Structure

PSL operates through a structured organizational framework encompassing Procurement, Sales and Marketing, Finance and Accounting, Production, Technical, and Administration. The Company's SAP enterprise resource planning implementation, initiated in the prior year, is now operationally embedded, enabling management to access real-time operational and financial reporting. This transition from legacy systems to SAP is a credit-positive development that enhances management visibility and reduces information asymmetry risk — a concern historically associated with family-controlled, mid-sized manufacturers.


Management Team

Mr. Yaqoob Haji Karim serves as Chief Executive Officer and reports to the Board of Directors. He brings 31 years of overall experience, all of which has been acquired within the group, including 7.5 years in his current leadership role. Mr. Noman Yaqoob is the Executive Director reporting to the CEO. He possesses 25 years of overall industry experience, including 9 years with the group and 9 years in his present position. Mr. Muhammad Imran holds the position of Company Secretary and reports to the CEO. With 33 years of overall experience, he has spent 32 years with the group and has been in the current role for 6 years. Mr. Syed Mazhar is Head of Plant (Port Qasim) and reports to the CEO. He carries 34 years of overall experience, out of which 27 years have been with the group and 13 years in the current position. Mr. Tanveer Mairaj serves as Head of Plant (Hub) and reports to the CEO. He has 37 years of overall experience, including 30 years with the group and 12 years in his present role. Mr. Shahid Yaqoob is the Chief Financial Officer reporting to the CEO. He brings 21 years of overall experience, including 6 years with the group and 5 years in the current position.


Effectiveness

The working combination of an experienced sponsoring family and a professionally grounded management team continues to support PSL's operational resilience amid an evolving and uncertain operating environment. Ongoing geopolitical tensions, along with fluctuations in raw material prices and energy costs, continue to pose challenges, particularly given the Company’s reliance on petrochemical inputs. Despite this, management has demonstrated the ability to navigate volatility through disciplined operational and financial practices. However, management’s effectiveness and efficiency can be ensured through the management committees. At PSL, the absence of management committees indicates room for improvement.


MIS

The full-cycle implementation of SAP across key functional modules represents a material improvement in information infrastructure. Enhanced data-driven decision-making capacity, reduced reporting lags, and standardized financial controls are expected to incrementally improve operational efficiency and financial discipline — outcomes that support sustainable credit quality over the medium term.


Control Environment

PSL maintains an active internal audit function tasked with proactive risk identification and reporting. The Company holds ISO 9001 quality certification and Halal certification, consistent with its mandate to supply multinational beverage and FMCG clients with high-specification, regulatory-compliant packaging materials. Compliance with the Code of Corporate Governance Regulations 2019 is confirmed, with non-mandatory provisions in respect of Director Training Program completion (6 of 8 directors certified) being addressed in the near term.


Business Risk
Industry Dynamics

The demand for Pakistan’s PET packaging industry remains largely driven by the beverage sector, making it inherently seasonal in nature. PET resin, the primary raw material used in packaging, is a petrochemical derivative and remains closely linked to global crude oil prices and PTA/MEG feedstock movements. Consequently, fluctuations in international oil prices and exchange rates continue to be a key source of cost and margin volatility for the industry. In addition to commodity-linked risks, the operating environment is currently influenced by ongoing geopolitical tensions and regional instability, which have heightened uncertainty in energy markets and global supply chains. These factors can lead to sudden shifts in freight costs, feedstock availability, and import pricing, given Pakistan’s reliance on imported derivatives of PET resin. Despite these challenges, PET remains a widely used packaging material due to its recyclability, lightweight nature, and strong demand across beverages, food, and household segments, supporting medium-term volume stability.


Relative Position

Pakistan Synthetics holds a modest market share in the PET Resin segment. Whereas, in the Plastic Caps and Metal Crowns, the Company is a market leader with an estimated share of ~40% during 6MFY26, respectively.


Revenues

The PET preform segment remained the largest revenue contributor, accounting for ~34% of total revenue in FY25 (FY24: ~42%), albeit with a reduced share compared to the prior year. Metal crowns and plastic caps maintained a stable contribution of ~29% (FY24: ~29%), reflecting consistent demand from the packaging segment. Meanwhile, PET resin gained prominence during the year, increasing its share to ~37% in FY25 from ~29% in FY24, indicating a shift in the revenue mix towards upstream PET trading/production activity. In FY25, the Company's revenue increased by 22.2% and stood at ~PKR 16,872mln (FY23: ~PKR 13,800mln). During 6MFY26, the revenue of the Company declined by 8.9% and was reported at PKR 5,988mln (6MFY25: ~PKR 6,575mln).


Margins

During FY25, the Company’s profitability profile reflected a moderation in margins compared to the prior year. The gross margin stood at ~11.7% (FY24: ~15%), while the operating profit margin was recorded at ~9.4% (FY24: ~11.8%). Consequently, the net profit margin slightly adjusted to ~2.2% (FY24: ~2.5%). The Company reported a PAT of ~PKR 367mln in FY25 compared to ~PKR 348mln in FY24, indicating a marginal improvement in absolute profitability. During 6MFY26, the gross margin declined to ~13.1% (6MFY25: ~14.8%), while the operating profit margin stood at ~11.3% (6MFY25: ~12.4%). The net profit margin increased to ~3.7% (6MFY25: ~2.6%), reflecting improved profitability during the period. The Company posted a PAT of PKR 219mln in 6MFY26 compared to PKR 169mln in 6MFY25.


Sustainability

In recent years, the Company has undergone significant expansion. Going forward, the Company plans to invest in BMR activities to improve operational efficiency and maintain market position. Additionally, the management is focused on consolidating its position in the industry and increasing the capacity utilization of the PET Preform segment


Financial Risk
Working capital

At end-Jun25, Pakistan Synthetics Limited (PSL) reported improved inventory efficiency, with inventory days declining to ~68 days (end-Jun24: ~86 days), reflecting better stock management and normalization from previously elevated inventory levels. Trade payable days also declined to ~38 days (end-Jun24: ~44 days), indicating relatively faster supplier settlements. As a result, net working capital days improved to ~87 days (end-Jun24: ~97 days), reflecting overall better working capital efficiency. At end-Dec25, inventory days remained broadly stable at ~104 days (end-Dec24: ~103 days), while trade payable days declined to ~49 days (end-Dec24: ~58 days). Consequently, net working capital days increased to ~132 days (end-Dec24: ~117 days), driven by sustained inventory levels and lower payable support, indicating higher working capital requirements.


Coverages

In FY25, Pakistan Synthetics Limited (PSL) reported an improvement in Funds from Operations before Working Capital (FCFOs), which increased to ~PKR 1,391mln (FY24: ~PKR 1,047mln), driven by stronger operating cash generation and improved conversion of earnings into cash flows. Accordingly, FCFO/finance cost coverage improved to ~2.1x (FY24: ~1.4x), reflecting enhanced debt servicing capacity. During 6MFY26, FCFOs further increased to ~PKR 760mln (6MFY25: ~PKR 660mln), indicating continued improvement in core operating cash generation. However, finance cost increased to ~PKR 380mln (6MFY25: ~PKR 289mln), resulting in FCFO/finance cost coverage moderating to ~2.7x (6MFY25: ~1.9x), reflecting a relatively higher finance cost burden despite improved cash generation.


Capitalization

At end-Jun25, Pakistan Synthetics Limited (PSL) reported an improvement in leverage metrics, with gearing declining to ~42.2% (Jun24: ~51.8%), primarily driven by a reduction in total borrowings to ~PKR 3,373mln (Jun24: ~PKR 4,595mln). The decline was mainly attributable to a significant reduction in short-term borrowings, which fell to ~PKR 2,417mln (Jun24: ~PKR 3,726mln), reflecting improved working capital management and lower reliance on bank funding. Meanwhile, the equity base strengthened to ~PKR 4,627mln (Jun24: ~PKR 4,260mln), further supporting the reduction in leverage. At end-Dec25, total borrowings increased to ~PKR 5,404mln (Dec24: ~PKR 4,093mln), driven primarily by a rise in short-term borrowings to ~PKR 4,205mln, indicating higher working capital funding requirements. However, the equity base also increased to ~PKR 4,846mln, partially cushioning the impact on leverage. Overall, this suggests a rebuilding of leverage position in the second half, mainly due to higher short-term funding needs.


 
 

Apr-26

www.pacra.com


(PKR mln)


Dec-25
6M
Jun-25
12M
Jun-24
12M
Jun-23
12M
Management Audited Audited Audited
A. BALANCE SHEET
1. Non-Current Assets 3,902 3,470 2,953 3,254
2. Investments 5 5 8 4
3. Related Party Exposure 921 975 1,179 1,398
4. Current Assets 7,506 6,748 7,020 4,952
a. Inventories 3,461 2,974 3,336 3,201
b. Trade Receivables 2,458 2,600 2,692 1,428
5. Total Assets 12,334 11,198 11,160 9,608
6. Current Liabilities 2,083 3,198 2,305 3,050
a. Trade Payables 1,275 1,960 1,558 1,780
7. Borrowings 5,404 3,373 4,595 2,432
8. Related Party Exposure 0 0 0 0
9. Non-Current Liabilities 0 0 0 215
10. Net Assets 4,847 4,628 4,261 3,911
11. Shareholders' Equity 4,847 4,628 4,261 3,911
B. INCOME STATEMENT
1. Sales 5,988 16,872 13,800 14,425
a. Cost of Good Sold (5,202) (14,896) (11,725) (11,847)
2. Gross Profit 786 1,976 2,074 2,578
a. Operating Expenses (107) (382) (443) (500)
3. Operating Profit 679 1,594 1,632 2,078
a. Non Operating Income or (Expense) (34) (291) (230) (325)
4. Profit or (Loss) before Interest and Tax 645 1,302 1,402 1,753
a. Total Finance Cost (289) (665) (844) (381)
b. Taxation (137) (270) (210) (574)
6. Net Income Or (Loss) 219 367 348 798
C. CASH FLOW STATEMENT
a. Free Cash Flows from Operations (FCFO) 760 1,391 1,047 1,899
b. Net Cash from Operating Activities before Working Capital Changes 503 740 344 1,592
c. Changes in Working Capital (1,843) 1,460 (2,276) (83)
1. Net Cash provided by Operating Activities (1,341) 2,199 (1,932) 1,508
2. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Investing Activities (704) (956) (223) (1,740)
3. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Financing Activities 278 (482) 886 116
4. Net Cash generated or (Used) during the period (1,766) 761 (1,269) (116)
D. RATIO ANALYSIS
1. Performance
a. Sales Growth (for the period) -29.0% 22.3% -4.3% 0.0%
b. Gross Profit Margin 13.1% 11.7% 15.0% 17.9%
c. Net Profit Margin 3.7% 2.2% 2.5% 5.5%
d. Cash Conversion Efficiency (FCFO adjusted for Working Capital/Sales) -18.1% 16.9% -8.9% 12.6%
e. Return on Equity [ Net Profit Margin * Asset Turnover * (Total Assets/Shareholders' Equity )] 9.2% 8.3% 8.5% 20.4%
2. Working Capital Management
a. Gross Working Capital (Average Days) 181 125 141 117
b. Net Working Capital (Average Days) 132 87 97 72
c. Current Ratio (Current Assets / Current Liabilities) 3.6 2.1 3.0 1.6
3. Coverages
a. EBITDA / Finance Cost 3.4 3.0 2.6 6.5
b. FCFO / Finance Cost+CMLTB+Excess STB 2.0 1.6 1.0 4.0
c. Debt Payback (Total Borrowings+Excess STB) / (FCFO-Finance Cost) 1.3 1.3 3.1 0.7
4. Capital Structure
a. Total Borrowings / (Total Borrowings+Shareholders' Equity) 52.7% 42.2% 51.9% 38.3%
b. Interest or Markup Payable (Days) 18.2 24.3 29.6 25.3
c. Entity Average Borrowing Rate 11.7% 14.5% 19.8% 15.6%

Apr-26

www.pacra.com

Apr-26

www.pacra.com

  1. Rating Team Statements
    1. Rating is just an opinion about the creditworthiness of the entity and does not constitute a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell any security of the entity rated or to buy, hold, or sell the security rated, as the case may be. (Chapter III; 14-3-(x))
    2. Conflict of Interest
      1. The Rating Team or any of their family members have no interest in this rating (Chapter III; 12-2-(j))
      2. PACRA, the analysts involved in the rating process, and members of its rating committee and their family members do not have any conflict of interest relating to the rating done by them (Chapter III; 12-2-(e) & (k))
      3. The analyst is not a substantial shareholder of the customer being rated by PACRA [Annexure F; d-(ii)]
      4. Explanation: for the purpose of the above clause, the term "family members" shall include only those family members who are dependent on the analyst and members of the rating committee.
  2. Restrictions
    1. No director, officer, or employee of PACRA communicates the information acquired by him for use for rating purposes to any other person, except where required under law to do so. (Chapter III; 10-(5))
    2. PACRA does not disclose or discuss with outside parties or make improper use of the non-public information which has come to its knowledge during a business relationship with the customer. (Chapter III; 10-7-(d))
    3. PACRA does not make proposals or recommendations regarding the activities of rated entities that could impact a credit rating of the entity subject to rating. (Chapter III; 10-7-(k))
  3. Conduct of Business
    1. PACRA fulfills its obligations in a fair, efficient, transparent, and ethical manner and renders high standards of services in performing its functions and obligations. (Chapter III; 11-A-(a))
    2. PACRA uses due care in the preparation of this Rating Report. Our information has been obtained from sources we consider to be reliable, but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. PACRA does not, in every instance, independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing this Rating Report. (Clause 11-(A)(p))
    3. PACRA prohibits its employees and analysts from soliciting money, gifts, or favors from anyone with whom PACRA conducts business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(q))
    4. PACRA ensures before the commencement of the rating process that an analyst or employee has not had a recent employment or other significant business or personal relationship with the rated entity that may cause or may be perceived as causing a conflict of interest. (Chapter III; 11-A-(r))
    5. PACRA maintains the principle of integrity in seeking rating business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(u))
    6. PACRA promptly investigates in the event of misconduct or a breach of the policies, procedures, and controls, and takes appropriate steps to rectify any weaknesses to prevent any recurrence, along with suitable punitive action against the responsible employee(s). (Chapter III; 11-B-(m))
  4. Independence & Conflict of Interest
    1. PACRA receives compensation from the entity being rated or any third party for the rating services it offers. The receipt of this compensation has no influence on PACRA’s opinions or other analytical processes. In all instances, PACRA is committed to preserving the objectivity, integrity, and independence of its ratings. Our relationship is governed by two distinct mandates: i) rating mandate - signed with the entity being rated or issuer of the debt instrument, and ii) fee mandate - signed with the payer, which can be different from the entity.
    2. PACRA does not provide consultancy/advisory services or other services to any of its customers or their associated companies and associated undertakings that are being rated or have been rated by it during the preceding three years, unless it has an adequate mechanism in place ensuring that the provision of such services does not lead to a conflict of interest situation with its rating activities. (Chapter III; 12-2-(d))
    3. PACRA discloses that no shareholder directly or indirectly holding 10% or more of the share capital of PACRA also holds directly or indirectly 10% or more of the share capital of the entity which is subject to rating or the entity which issued the instrument subject to rating by PACRA. (Chapter III; 12-2-(f))
    4. PACRA ensures that the rating assigned to an entity or instrument is not affected by the existence of a business relationship between PACRA and the entity or any other party, or the non-existence of such a relationship. (Chapter III; 12-2-(i))
    5. PACRA ensures that the analysts or any of their family members shall not buy, sell, or engage in any transaction in any security which falls in the analyst’s area of primary analytical responsibility. This clause, however, does not apply to investments in securities through collective investment schemes. (Chapter III; 12-2-(l))
    6. PACRA has established policies and procedures governing investments and trading in securities by its employees and for monitoring the same to prevent insider trading, market manipulation, or any other market abuse. (Chapter III; 11-B-(g))
  5. Monitoring and Review
    1. PACRA monitors all the outstanding ratings continuously, and any potential change therein due to any event associated with the issuer, the security arrangement, the industry, etc., is disseminated to the market immediately and in an effective manner after appropriate consultation with the entity/issuer. (Chapter III; 17-(a))
    2. PACRA reviews all the outstanding ratings periodically on an annual basis. Provided that public dissemination of annual review and in an instance of change in rating will be made. (Chapter III; 17-(b))
    3. PACRA initiates an immediate review of the outstanding rating upon becoming aware of any information that may reasonably be expected to result in downgrading of the rating. (Chapter III; 17-(c))
    4. PACRA engages with the issuer and the debt securities trustee to remain updated on all information pertaining to the rating of the entity/instrument. (Chapter III; 17-(d))
  6. Probability of Default
    1. PACRA’s Rating Scale reflects the expectation of credit risk. The highest rating has the lowest relative likelihood of default (i.e., probability). PACRA’s transition studies capture the historical performance behavior of a specific rating notch. Transition behavior of the assigned rating can be obtained from PACRA’s Transition Study available at our website. (www.pacra.com) However, the actual transition of rating may not follow the pattern observed in the past. (Chapter III; 14-3(f)(vii))
  7. Proprietary Information
    1. All information contained herein is considered proprietary by PACRA. Hence, none of the information in this document can be copied or otherwise reproduced, stored, or disseminated in whole or in part in any form or by any means whatsoever by any person without PACRA’s prior written consent.

Apr-26

www.pacra.com