Rating History
Dissemination Date Long-Term Rating Short-Term Rating Outlook Action Rating Watch
12-May-26 A- A2 Stable Maintain -
12-May-25 A- A2 Stable Initial -
About the Entity

BF Biosciences Limited (BFBIO) is a publicly listed company operating in Pakistan’s pharmaceutical sector since 2006. The parent company, Ferozsons Laboratories Limited holds ~57.36% and the Bago Group holds a stake of ~14.34% in the Company. The Board of Directors comprises seven members, including four non-executive, two independent (has one casual vacancy after one director resigned which will be filled in due course), and one executive director. Mr. Sebastian Martin Ferrarassi serves as the Chairman, while Mr. Muhammad Farhan Rafiq holds the position of Chief Executive Officer.

Rating Rationale

BF Biosciences Limited (hereafter referred to as “BFBIO” or “the Company”) is Pakistan’s most advanced biotech formulation company and is primarily engaged in the manufacturing, marketing, and distribution of biological and non-biological medicines in both liquid and lyophilized injectable forms. BFBIO distinguishes itself by producing life-saving medicines related to various therapeutic areas, i.e., Hepatology, Chronic Kidney Diseases, Anti-fungal/Oncology, Cardiology, Diabetes/Anti-obesity, Dermatology, Gastroenterology, and Antivirals. The Company operates a state-of-the-art manufacturing facility designed and installed by a leading European firm specializing in the design and installation of Pharmaceutical and Biotech manufacturing facilities, Telstar Projects, in line with the standards of EU, USFDA, and GMP requirements. BFBIO’s product portfolio is further enhanced through its strategic collaboration and partnership with Bago Group, a renowned Argentine multinational conglomerate founded in 1934. Pakistan’s pharmaceutical industry continues to exhibit strong structural growth, supported by non-cyclical demand fundamentals and a rising disease burden, with the market reaching PKR 1,182.6 billion (MAT Jan’26). Despite a fragmented and highly competitive landscape, long-term demand remains underpinned by the increasing prevalence of non-communicable diseases (NCDs), particularly diabetes and oncology, driving a sustained need for chronic and specialty therapies. Within this context, the biopharmaceutical and injectable segment offers relatively stronger growth prospects, supported by high entry barriers and increasing institutional demand. The segment’s expansion is further driven by import substitution, positioning specialized local players to benefit from evolving healthcare needs and procurement dynamics. BFBIO’s product mix is primarily focused on chronic therapies, comprising ~60% biological and ~40% non-biological products. Its leading brands include Icon, Rifaxa, Ferulin, Eritrogen, Vorif, Peg INF, Novapressin, Sematide, Noxane, and Zeptide. During 9MFY26, BFBIO reported revenues of ~PKR 7,236mln, registering a growth of ~71.7% over 9MFY25 (~PKR 4,214mln). This increase is primarily attributable to volume scale-up following the full-scale commercialization and ramp-up of Line-II, materially enhancing the Company’s production capacity and market supply, alongside contributions from new product introductions. In 9MFY26, the Company’s gross margin improved; however, operating and net margins declined. BFBIO’s financial risk profile is characterized by an adequate working capital cycle, cash flow generation, and strong coverage ratios. The capital structure is moderately leveraged, with borrowings primarily consisting of long-term debt to support CAPEX.

Key Rating Drivers

The ratings remain dependent on the Company’s ability to sustain growth in topline revenues, strengthen its standalone market share. The adequacy of operating cash flows, effective management of the working capital cycle, and maintenance of comfortable debt service coverage metrics will continue to be closely monitored. Furthermore, steady progress toward SRA certifications and diversification of export markets will be viewed positively.

Profile
Legal Structure

BF Biosciences Limited (hereafter referred to as “BFBIO” or “the Company”) was incorporated on February 24, 2006, as an unlisted public limited company under the Companies Ordinance 1984 (now Companies Act, 2017). The Company is a joint venture between Ferozsons Laboratories Limited and the Bagó Group of Argentina. In October 2024, the Company was listed on the Pakistan Stock Exchange (PSX). The registered office of the Company is located at 197-A, The Mall, Rawalpindi.


Background

In 2006, BFBIO was established following the signing of an agreement between Ferozsons Laboratories Limited, Pakistan (“the Parent Company”), and the Bagó Group of Argentina to establish a “Biotech Pharmaceutical Plant”. The plant was completed, and the Company began operations on July 1, 2009, to manufacture biological medicines for the treatment of Cancer and Hepatitis C for local and export markets. In 2020, BFBIO executed a non-exclusive license agreement with Gilead Sciences, Inc. for the manufacture and sale of Remdesivir, an antiviral drug used in the treatment of COVID-19 patients, under Gilead’s Global Patient Solutions (GPS) Program. This program aimed to improve access to medications for patients worldwide, particularly in developing countries. Agreements were executed with five South Asian manufacturers, and BFBIO was the only company from Pakistan licensed to manufacture Remdesivir for distribution in up to 127 countries. In recognition of its efforts, BFBIO was awarded the PESA Award in 2021 for the export of Remdesivir. Management decided that all the net cash flows generated from the Remdesivir would be invested to increase BFBIO’s production capacity through a brownfield expansion (“Line II”), capable of producing biological and non-biological products. In FY 2020-21, the financial close of state-of-the-art “Line II” expansion comprising a high-speed pre-filled syringes line, 42 square meter lyophilizer, a combi filling line, and other ancillary accessories was achieved. In Oct-24, the Company raised funds by issuing a total of 25 million ordinary shares through an initial public offering (IPO) to meet post-expansion working capital needs, CAPEX to enhance process efficiencies, obtain export certifications (PIC/S & SRA), and new product development, including Glucagon-like Peptide (GLP1).


Operations

BFBIO is primarily engaged in the manufacturing and sales of biological and non-biological medicines, including the treatment of Cancer and Hepatitis C for the local and export markets as well. It has a state-of-the-art manufacturing facility in Sundar Raiwind Road, Lahore, and it is also the most advanced Biopharmaceutical plant of Pakistan. The facility is designed as per the USFDA & EMEA Standards, which are ISO 9001, 45000, and 14001 certified and fully equipped with state-of-the-art manufacturing and testing equipment. It was the first USFDA-compliant pharmaceutical facility in the country. They have also helped Pakistan join the select group of companies that are exporting biotech pharmaceuticals. It produces specialized injectables in vials and prefilled syringes and has currently completed its major capacity expansion (Line-II) in 2024. This expansion was financed through debt (~70%) and internal cash flows (~30%). Notably, a majority of this debt was a subsidized loan obtained under the TERF scheme. During 9MFY26, the company’s production volume has continued to scale following the ramp-up of Line-II. During 1HFY26, total output reached ~3.4 million units, compared to ~3.0 million units produced in all of FY25, as detailed in the table below. This growth in manufacturing output reflects the successful scaling of operations and the immediate utilization of the newly added facility capacity.



Ownership
Ownership Structure

Ferozsons Laboratories Limited, the parent company, owned the majority stake of ~80%, and the Bago Group owned a stake of ~20% in FY24. Post-IPO, the parent company, Ferozsons, now holds a stake of ~57.36%, and the Bago group owns ~14.34% of shares in the Company. The remaining share is held by the general public.


Stability

The ownership structure of the Company is considered stable, as it has remained under the control of the current sponsors since incorporation, with no changes expected in the foreseeable future.


Business Acumen

With over six decades of active engagement in the pharmaceutical sector, the parent company and its sponsoring family have consistently demonstrated strong business acumen. Their core strengths include establishing strategic international partnerships (i.e., Argentine Bagó Group and Gilead Sciences) and developing strategic alliances with leading organizations in the global healthcare industry. The Bagó Group, established in 1934 and recognized as Argentina’s premier pharmaceutical group, further exemplifies this acumen. This influential group comprises diverse companies focused on human health, animal health, and pharmaceutical distribution, driven by continuous therapeutic innovation and consistent investment in R&D. Notably, within the first two years of their partnership, they achieved a position among the top three companies in both the oncology and hepatology segments. The enduring commitment to excellence of both Ferozsons and Bagó has enabled the Company to effectively navigate the complexities of the pharmaceutical landscape, fostering sustained growth and continuous innovation.


Financial Strength

The Ferozsons Group demonstrates financial strength through its strategic investments in BF Biosciences Limited (a subsidiary) and Farmacia (a partnership). With a group size of PKR 18.9bln as of Jun-25, the Company is well-positioned within the industry, and its prospects are considered strong. Further strengthening its financial standing is its strategic alliance with the Bagó Group, with an extensive portfolio reaching over 47 countries across Latin America, Europe, Asia, Oceania, and Africa, with a direct presence in 22 countries and the remaining markets served through exports. This global reach ensures a diverse range of cutting-edge products, further strengthening the Company’s financial outlook.


Governance
Board Structure

The board comprises seven members: four non-executive directors (including the chairman), two independent directors, and one executive director. This diverse composition ensures compliance with the corporate governance code. Mr. Naveed Kamran Baloch tendered his resignation from the Board with effect from March 3, 2026, creating a casual vacancy. The resulting position on the Board, Audit Committee, and HR & Remuneration Committee will be filled in due course in accordance with applicable regulations.


Members’ Profile

All members of the Board of Directors (BoD) are seasoned professionals with extensive industry experience and long-standing affiliations with the company. The Chairman, Mr. Sebastian Martin Ferrarassi (Non-executive director), possesses over 30 years of enriched experience relating to the pharma industry, which enables him to contribute effectively to the board’s decision-making process. The Board also includes independent director S M Wajeeh Uddin, who brings over three decades of experience across various sectors, including multinational healthcare and pharmaceutical companies. Mr. Naveed Kamran Baloch, previously serving as an independent director, resigned with effect from March 3, 2026. Among the non-executive directors, Mr. Osman Khalid Waheed, Mrs. Amna Piracha Khan, and Mrs. Munize Azhar Paracha further strengthen the Board with their diverse professional backgrounds and extensive expertise.


Board Effectiveness

The board of BFBIO has established two key committees: the Audit Committee and the HR & Remuneration Committee. Each of these is chaired by an independent director, ensuring impartial oversight and robust governance. During the year, multiple board meetings were held. Attendance of board members in these meetings remained strong, and minutes are documented adequately.


Financial Transparency

M/S KPMG Taseer Hadi & Co. Chartered Accountants, which are among the Big-4 and classified in category ‘A’ by SBP with satisfactory QCR rating, are the external auditors of the Company. The firm has expressed an unqualified opinion on the financial statements for the year ended June, 2025.


Management
Organizational Structure

The Company has a clearly defined organizational structure, comprising functional and administrative departments, each with a multilayered hierarchy, and is led by a qualified department head. Each department head reports directly to the CEO. At present, all key positions within the organization are fully staffed.


Management Team

The management team is composed of highly qualified professionals who bring extensive skills and have long-standing associations with the Company. Mr. Farhan Rafiq, the Chief Executive Officer (CEO), is a Chartered Accountant with over 20 years of experience in the pharmaceutical industry. Mr. Abdur Rehman, the Chief Financial Officer (CFO), is also a Chartered Accountant, contributing over 15 years of relevant expertise and a diverse skill set. This leadership is further assisted by a team of experienced professionals, ensuring good governance and strategic direction.


Effectiveness

The Company has established clear reporting lines, further enhanced by the presence of a management committee which includes all chiefs and directors of all departments. Meetings are convened as needed to discuss key operational and strategic matters. Noteworthily, performance reports are prepared and submitted to all department heads on a monthly basis.


MIS

BFBIO has implemented SAP S/4 HANA through Systems Limited, ensuring compliance with global standards for enterprise management systems. It provides a real-time, end-to-end integrated solution for operations across finance, sales & marketing, production, procurement, quality management, and human capital management.


Control Environment

A detailed Management Information System (MIS), featuring key performance indicators, is submitted to the CEO/CFO on a monthly basis, including an income statement, segment-wise and region-wise breakdowns of revenue and profit, efficiency variance reports, as well as receivables, payables, and inventory aging reports, and an operational expenditure summary. The current control environment includes a formally constituted independent internal audit function. This strengthens the third-party assurance on internal controls, process adherence, and risk management adequacy.


Business Risk
Industry Dynamics

Pakistan’s pharmaceutical industry has demonstrated sustained structural expansion, with the total market reaching PKR 1,182.6 billion on a MAT basis as of January 2026, reflecting growth of 15.2% and a 5-year MAT CAGR of 17.2%. This consistent double-digit trajectory highlights the sector’s defensive, non-cyclical nature, underpinned by inelastic healthcare demand and rising disease prevalence, making it relatively resilient versus broader macroeconomic volatility. The market remains predominantly a branded-generic structure, comprising over 700 registered manufacturers and more than 70,000 approved formulations. Industry participants are broadly categorized into multinational companies (MNCs), large domestic manufacturers, and a long tail of small-scale generic producers. MNCs account for approximately 25–30% of the market by value, while domestic players dominate volume, reflecting Pakistan’s strong affordability-driven consumption pattern across both public and private healthcare channels. Structurally, the industry is highly competitive and fragmented. Key competitive dynamics include: (i) brand equity and physician engagement through medical detailing in prescription-driven therapies, (ii) persistent pricing pressure from unregistered or substandard products reflecting regulatory enforcement gaps, which industry bodies such as the PPMA continue to advocate against, (iii) reliance on a fragmented wholesale and retail pharmacy distribution network that intensifies price competition, and (iv) increasing contestation in institutional procurement channels, where both domestic manufacturers and importers compete for government and tender-based demand.

Demand-side growth is being structurally reinforced by an increasing disease burden, particularly the rise of non-communicable diseases (NCDs). Pakistan faces a significant metabolic health challenge, with diabetes prevalence estimated at ~33% among adults and a high incidence of overweight and obesity (57% among women and 41% among men per WHO estimates). These epidemiological trends are creating sustained, long-duration demand for anti-diabetic, cardiovascular, and obesity-related therapeutics. Globally, this trend is most visible in the rapid expansion of GLP-1 receptor agonists such as semaglutide and tirzepatide, with the global GLP-1 market projected to exceed USD 100 billion by 2030, underscoring the shift toward high-value metabolic therapies. Oncology and pre-cancer related therapies also represent an increasingly important growth segment. Pakistan continues to witness a rising incidence of cancer cases, driven by population growth, aging demographics, lifestyle risk factors, tobacco consumption, and delayed diagnosis rates. In parallel, greater clinical focus on early screening and pre-cancer conditions is gradually expanding demand for preventive and early-stage interventions. This is supporting higher utilization of chemotherapy agents, targeted therapies, supportive care medicines, and specialty injectables. Given the relatively high cost and technical complexity of oncology treatment, domestic manufacturing and biosimilar development present meaningful import substitution opportunities over the medium term.

Other high-burden therapeutic areas, including nephrology, hepatitis, and infectious diseases, continue to drive demand for specialty pharmaceuticals, particularly injectables and biologics. However, access remains structurally constrained by affordability and system-level limitations, including low insurance penetration and a predominantly out-of-pocket healthcare financing model. From a structural demand perspective, Pakistan’s population of ~240 million, with a median age below 23 years, provides a long-term demographic tailwind supporting volume growth. However, per capita pharmaceutical expenditure remains low at approximately USD 12–14 per annum, indicating significant latent demand that is currently suppressed by income constraints and access barriers.

Against this backdrop, the biopharmaceutical and injectable segment represent a structurally distinct and higher-barrier sub-market within the broader industry. Unlike oral solid dosage (OSD) formulations, biologics and complex injectables require advanced manufacturing capabilities such as aseptic processing, lyophilization, and large-volume parenteral production. These technological and regulatory barriers significantly raise entry thresholds and limit the competitive set.

Historically, Pakistan has been heavily dependent on imports for biologics and specialty injectables, with only a limited number of domestic players developing meaningful capabilities in this space. As a result, the growth of the biotech injectable segment is being driven by: (i) import substitution as local manufacturing gradually replaces high-cost imported therapies, (ii) increasing institutional procurement through public sector tenders and Essential Medicines List (EML) inclusion, particularly in oncology, nephrology, and infectious disease categories, (iii) gradual expansion of hospital formularies incorporating biosimilars and specialty injectables, and (iv) selective export opportunities in comparable emerging markets.

Within this context, BF Biosciences operates in a structurally high-growth but technically complex segment of the pharmaceutical value chain, where long-term growth is anchored not only in demand expansion but also in manufacturing capability depth and regulatory alignment with institutional healthcare procurement systems.


Relative Position

On a consolidated basis, the Ferozsons Group (including BFBIO) holds an estimated market position of No. 21 in Pakistan’s pharmaceutical industry, with aggregate reported sales of ~PKR 19 billion and a combined market share of approximately 1.7%. The Company’s portfolio covers chronic and specialty care therapeutic areas including diabetes/Anti-obesity, hepatology, Anti-fungal/Oncology, and cardiology. These segments exhibit relatively stable prescription demand. Within its portfolio, BFBIO holds leading positions in select niche molecules, particularly in hepatology and oncology-related injectables.


Revenues

During 9MFY26, the Company reported a topline of ~PKR 7,236mln, reflecting growth of ~71.7% over 9MFY25 (PKR 4,214mln). The growth is primarily volume-led, supported by continued capacity utilization gains following the commercialization of Line-II, alongside incremental contributions from new product introductions and increased penetration of existing brands. In-market generic sales grew by ~61% YoY, while institutional sales expanded by ~141%, reflecting broad-based demand traction across both channels. The revenue trajectory is consistent with the capacity ramp-up and field force investment undertaken since FY24, though sustaining this rate of growth will become progressively more challenging as base effects accumulate.

The revenue mix remains moderately diversified, with biological products contributing ~60% of sales, while non-biological products account for the remaining ~40%, providing a balance between volume-driven and relatively higher-value segments. Geographically, the sales mix remains largely domestic (~98.5%), with exports contributing a modest ~1.5% of net revenues (~PKR 109mln) as of 9MFY26, reflecting continued reliance on local demand dynamics. The Company’s export reached nine markets in 1HFY26 but remains nascent. The closure of the Afghanistan border has been flagged as a near-term constraint on export expansion, limiting near-term diversification of the revenue base.


Margins

Profitability indicators showed recovery in gross margins during 9MFY26. Gross margins improved to ~44.1% in 9MFY26 (9MFY25: ~41.2%; FY25: 39.2%), reflecting better overhead absorption as production volumes scaled through Line II utilization and a favorable product mix shift toward higher-value biological products. At the operating level, margins moderated to ~12.7% (FY25: 13.4%), as selling and distribution expenses rose ~97% year-on-year, driven by ongoing field force expansion and marketing support for new product launches. Administrative expenses also increased by ~PKR 97mln over the nine-month period. Net profit margin moderated to ~6.4% (FY25: 7.7%), with the effective tax rate rising to ~43.3% (FY25: 38.2%). 


Sustainability

BFBIO’s long-term operating sustainability is anchored in its biopharmaceutical manufacturing platform, which provides a differentiated production capability relative to conventional oral solid dosage manufacturers. The Company maintains a defined product development pipeline, including GLP-1/GIP-based molecules (Zeptide®, tirzepatide and Sematide®, semaglutide), targeting the structurally high-demand diabetes and anti-obesity segment. The IPO proceeds continue to fund the Company’s investment plan, with a remaining balance of ~PKR 282mln as of March 2026. Geographic diversification of revenue remains limited, increasing vulnerability to domestic market dynamics. The Company’s medium-term growth strategy is partially dependent on obtaining SRA certifications to access regulated export markets. This process involves significant time, regulatory engagement, and capital. Delays or failures in certification would defer export revenue and limit the return on the biopharmaceutical manufacturing platform. Continued pursuit of PIC/S and SRA certifications is necessary to unlock export market access. BFBIO’s API sourcing is ~85–90% import-dependent, with procurement planning and forward-buying practices used to buffer supply chain disruptions. DRAP GMP compliance is maintained, and the Company monitors regulatory developments affecting pricing and product registration. BFBIO’s entry into the GLP-1/GIP segment (Sematide, Zeptide) places it in competition with multinational originators and multiple domestic manufacturers pursuing the same opportunity. Pricing pressure, formulary competition, and the rapid pace of innovation in this class create execution risks for margin sustainability in the anti-obesity and diabetes portfolio.


Financial Risk
Working capital

The Company’s working capital cycle elongated modestly during 9MFY26, with gross working capital days rising to ~96 days (FY25: ~88 days). This was driven primarily by an inventory build-up, with total inventory days reaching ~81 days (FY25: ~76 days). The inventory build reflects BFBIO’s strategy of maintaining higher raw material buffers to mitigate supply chain disruptions arising from geopolitical risks and the closure of the Afghanistan border impacting logistics. Trade receivable days increased marginally to ~15 days (FY25: ~12 days), broadly consistent with historical norms for the sector and reflecting the higher institutional sales mix. On the liability side, payable days contracted to ~11 days (FY25: ~18 days), suggesting shorter supplier payment terms or a change in the creditor mix. As a result, net working capital days widened to ~85 days (FY25: ~70 days), representing a modest but monitored deterioration. Operating cash flow was negative at PKR (161mln) during 9MFY26, driven by significant working capital consumption. While the Company maintained liquidity through short-term investments and credit lines, a sustained period of negative operating cash generation could pressure financial flexibility and accelerate reliance on short-term borrowings. The liquid cover ratio declined to approximately 9.9x in 9MFY26 from approximately 11.7x in FY25, due to the drawdown of short-term credit lines to fund working capital requirements.


Coverages

The Company’s coverage profile improved in 9MFY26, driven by EBITDA growth and continued moderation in finance costs. EBITDA expanded to ~PKR 1,167mln over the nine-month period (annualized: ~PKR 1,556mln). The EBITDA-to-finance-cost ratio improved to ~17.6x (FY25: ~8.8x), reflecting both operating earnings growth and declining interest burden as long-term debt amortizes under a declining rate environment. The coverage ratio improved to ~13.4x (FY25: ~5.9x), supported by FCFO of approximately PKR 887mln during the nine months, which represents an ~80.5% increase over FY25 annualized levels. Core debt service coverage improved to ~2.2x (FY25: ~1.2x), and the debt payback period improved to ~1.7x (FY25: ~3.9x). These metrics provide adequate headroom above debt service obligations and reflect the deleveraging trajectory.


Capitalization

The Company’s capital structure remained sound as of 9MFY26, with the leverage ratio at ~28.7% (FY25: ~31.6%; FY24: ~54.0%; FY23: ~62.1%), continuing a multi-year deleveraging trajectory supported by equity accumulation from retained earnings (Equity: PKR 5,127mln at 9MFY26, vs. PKR 4,662mln at FY25) and active long-term debt repayments of ~PKR 282mln during the nine-month period. Total borrowings were broadly stable at PKR 2,068mln (FY25: PKR 2,157mln). A notable shift in 9MFY26 is the increased utilization of short-term borrowings, which rose to ~PKR 216mln (FY25: ~PKR 29mln), representing ~10.4 of total borrowings (FY25: ~1.4%). This reflects the Company’s use of working capital facilities to partially fund the significant inventory and receivables expansion. The remaining IPO proceeds balance of ~PKR 282mln as of March 2026 provides some financial flexibility for the planned cartridge facility and ongoing product development milestones.


 
 

May-26

www.pacra.com


(PKR mln)


Mar-26
9M
Jun-25
12M
Jun-24
12M
Jun-23
12M
A. BALANCE SHEET
1. Non-Current Assets 4,562 4,322 4,183 4,076
2. Investments 544 1,167 39 147
3. Related Party Exposure 0 0 0 0
4. Current Assets 4,075 2,670 1,638 1,444
a. Inventories 2,623 1,645 779 769
b. Trade Receivables 596 184 205 94
5. Total Assets 9,181 8,159 5,860 5,667
6. Current Liabilities 1,620 1,089 640 364
a. Trade Payables 243 321 269 176
7. Borrowings 2,068 2,157 2,770 3,236
8. Related Party Exposure 47 63 42 79
9. Non-Current Liabilities 319 187 48 14
10. Net Assets 5,127 4,662 2,360 1,974
11. Shareholders' Equity 5,127 4,662 2,360 1,974
B. INCOME STATEMENT
1. Sales 7,236 5,837 3,659 1,810
a. Cost of Good Sold (4,047) (3,550) (2,126) (1,360)
2. Gross Profit 3,189 2,288 1,533 450
a. Operating Expenses (2,270) (1,506) (757) (161)
3. Operating Profit 919 782 775 289
a. Non Operating Income or (Expense) (22) 70 (42) 67
4. Profit or (Loss) before Interest and Tax 898 851 733 356
a. Total Finance Cost (77) (128) (151) (153)
b. Taxation (355) (277) (196) (53)
6. Net Income Or (Loss) 465 447 385 149
C. CASH FLOW STATEMENT
a. Free Cash Flows from Operations (FCFO) 887 655 725 204
b. Net Cash from Operating Activities before Working Capital Changes 827 543 563 84
c. Changes in Working Capital (1,048) (355) (60) (402)
1. Net Cash provided by Operating Activities (221) 188 503 (318)
2. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Investing Activities 271 (1,335) (14) (724)
3. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Financing Activities (293) 1,513 (321) 761
4. Net Cash generated or (Used) during the period (243) 365 168 (281)
D. RATIO ANALYSIS
1. Performance
a. Sales Growth (for the period) 65.3% 59.5% 102.2% 19.0%
b. Gross Profit Margin 44.1% 39.2% 41.9% 24.8%
c. Net Profit Margin 6.4% 7.7% 10.5% 8.2%
d. Cash Conversion Efficiency (FCFO adjusted for Working Capital/Sales) -2.2% 5.1% 18.2% -10.9%
e. Return on Equity [ Net Profit Margin * Asset Turnover * (Total Assets/Shareholders' Equity )] 12.7% 12.7% 17.8% 7.8%
2. Working Capital Management
a. Gross Working Capital (Average Days) 96 88 92 126
b. Net Working Capital (Average Days) 85 70 70 93
c. Current Ratio (Current Assets / Current Liabilities) 2.5 2.5 2.6 4.0
3. Coverages
a. EBITDA / Finance Cost 17.6 8.8 5.7 2.2
b. FCFO / Finance Cost+CMLTB+Excess STB 2.2 1.2 1.3 0.3
c. Debt Payback (Total Borrowings+Excess STB) / (FCFO-Finance Cost) 1.7 3.9 4.2 45.3
4. Capital Structure
a. Total Borrowings / (Total Borrowings+Shareholders' Equity) 28.7% 31.6% 54.0% 62.1%
b. Interest or Markup Payable (Days) 70.4 54.0 87.9 111.7
c. Entity Average Borrowing Rate 4.1% 4.4% 4.7% 5.3%

May-26

www.pacra.com

May-26

www.pacra.com

  1. Rating Team Statements
    1. Rating is just an opinion about the creditworthiness of the entity and does not constitute a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell any security of the entity rated or to buy, hold, or sell the security rated, as the case may be. (Chapter III; 14-3-(x))
    2. Conflict of Interest
      1. The Rating Team or any of their family members have no interest in this rating (Chapter III; 12-2-(j))
      2. PACRA, the analysts involved in the rating process, and members of its rating committee and their family members do not have any conflict of interest relating to the rating done by them (Chapter III; 12-2-(e) & (k))
      3. The analyst is not a substantial shareholder of the customer being rated by PACRA [Annexure F; d-(ii)]
      4. Explanation: for the purpose of the above clause, the term "family members" shall include only those family members who are dependent on the analyst and members of the rating committee.
  2. Restrictions
    1. No director, officer, or employee of PACRA communicates the information acquired by him for use for rating purposes to any other person, except where required under law to do so. (Chapter III; 10-(5))
    2. PACRA does not disclose or discuss with outside parties or make improper use of the non-public information which has come to its knowledge during a business relationship with the customer. (Chapter III; 10-7-(d))
    3. PACRA does not make proposals or recommendations regarding the activities of rated entities that could impact a credit rating of the entity subject to rating. (Chapter III; 10-7-(k))
  3. Conduct of Business
    1. PACRA fulfills its obligations in a fair, efficient, transparent, and ethical manner and renders high standards of services in performing its functions and obligations. (Chapter III; 11-A-(a))
    2. PACRA uses due care in the preparation of this Rating Report. Our information has been obtained from sources we consider to be reliable, but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. PACRA does not, in every instance, independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing this Rating Report. (Clause 11-(A)(p))
    3. PACRA prohibits its employees and analysts from soliciting money, gifts, or favors from anyone with whom PACRA conducts business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(q))
    4. PACRA ensures before the commencement of the rating process that an analyst or employee has not had a recent employment or other significant business or personal relationship with the rated entity that may cause or may be perceived as causing a conflict of interest. (Chapter III; 11-A-(r))
    5. PACRA maintains the principle of integrity in seeking rating business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(u))
    6. PACRA promptly investigates in the event of misconduct or a breach of the policies, procedures, and controls, and takes appropriate steps to rectify any weaknesses to prevent any recurrence, along with suitable punitive action against the responsible employee(s). (Chapter III; 11-B-(m))
  4. Independence & Conflict of Interest
    1. PACRA receives compensation from the entity being rated or any third party for the rating services it offers. The receipt of this compensation has no influence on PACRA’s opinions or other analytical processes. In all instances, PACRA is committed to preserving the objectivity, integrity, and independence of its ratings. Our relationship is governed by two distinct mandates: i) rating mandate - signed with the entity being rated or issuer of the debt instrument, and ii) fee mandate - signed with the payer, which can be different from the entity.
    2. PACRA does not provide consultancy/advisory services or other services to any of its customers or their associated companies and associated undertakings that are being rated or have been rated by it during the preceding three years, unless it has an adequate mechanism in place ensuring that the provision of such services does not lead to a conflict of interest situation with its rating activities. (Chapter III; 12-2-(d))
    3. PACRA discloses that no shareholder directly or indirectly holding 10% or more of the share capital of PACRA also holds directly or indirectly 10% or more of the share capital of the entity which is subject to rating or the entity which issued the instrument subject to rating by PACRA. (Chapter III; 12-2-(f))
    4. PACRA ensures that the rating assigned to an entity or instrument is not affected by the existence of a business relationship between PACRA and the entity or any other party, or the non-existence of such a relationship. (Chapter III; 12-2-(i))
    5. PACRA ensures that the analysts or any of their family members shall not buy, sell, or engage in any transaction in any security which falls in the analyst’s area of primary analytical responsibility. This clause, however, does not apply to investments in securities through collective investment schemes. (Chapter III; 12-2-(l))
    6. PACRA has established policies and procedures governing investments and trading in securities by its employees and for monitoring the same to prevent insider trading, market manipulation, or any other market abuse. (Chapter III; 11-B-(g))
  5. Monitoring and Review
    1. PACRA monitors all the outstanding ratings continuously, and any potential change therein due to any event associated with the issuer, the security arrangement, the industry, etc., is disseminated to the market immediately and in an effective manner after appropriate consultation with the entity/issuer. (Chapter III; 17-(a))
    2. PACRA reviews all the outstanding ratings periodically on an annual basis. Provided that public dissemination of annual review and in an instance of change in rating will be made. (Chapter III; 17-(b))
    3. PACRA initiates an immediate review of the outstanding rating upon becoming aware of any information that may reasonably be expected to result in downgrading of the rating. (Chapter III; 17-(c))
    4. PACRA engages with the issuer and the debt securities trustee to remain updated on all information pertaining to the rating of the entity/instrument. (Chapter III; 17-(d))
  6. Probability of Default
    1. PACRA’s Rating Scale reflects the expectation of credit risk. The highest rating has the lowest relative likelihood of default (i.e., probability). PACRA’s transition studies capture the historical performance behavior of a specific rating notch. Transition behavior of the assigned rating can be obtained from PACRA’s Transition Study available at our website. (www.pacra.com) However, the actual transition of rating may not follow the pattern observed in the past. (Chapter III; 14-3(f)(vii))
  7. Proprietary Information
    1. All information contained herein is considered proprietary by PACRA. Hence, none of the information in this document can be copied or otherwise reproduced, stored, or disseminated in whole or in part in any form or by any means whatsoever by any person without PACRA’s prior written consent.

May-26

www.pacra.com