Rating History
Dissemination Date Long-Term Rating Short-Term Rating Outlook Action Rating Watch
12-May-26 A A1 Stable Maintain -
12-May-25 A A1 Stable Maintain -
05-Jun-24 A A1 Stable Initial -
About the Entity

Beacon Impex commenced operations in 2005. The majority shareholding lies with the Company's CEO, Mr. Muhammad Shakeel Faridi, the director, Mr. Mudassar Zafar, and other sponsors. The Company has a capacity of ~7.4mln garments per month and knitted products. The Board comprises two BoDs, including the CEO, Mr. Muhammad Shakeel Faridi, and Mr. Mudassar Zafar.

Rating Rationale

Beacon Impex (Pvt.) Limited ("the Company" or "Beacon Impex") has established a focused operational presence within Pakistan's dedicated bodywear segment, approximately spanning over a decade. The Company operates with a vertically integrated manufacturing facility consisting of spinning, knitting, elastic fabrication, dyeing, processing, cutting, and garment assembly. The integrated structure synergizes cost optimization and production consistency through automation of its processes. The Company’s investment in a centralized, KPI-driven monitoring infrastructure supports real-time oversight of operational performance and improves process efficiency. In addition, the adoption of RFID and barcode-based tracking systems enables end-to-end traceability, reinforcing internal controls and reducing operational risk. The product portfolio is majorly concentrated in bodywear, boxers and briefs, with revenue supported by a client base that includes Puma, Hugo Boss, Levi's, and Amazon. These names provide a degree of demand visibility and client retention through quality assurance, albeit with associated concentration risk. FY25 revenues expanded 45.1% to PKR 52,640mln (FY24: PKR 36,274mln), driven by export volume growth. Momentum moderated in 1HFY26 at PKR 24,686mln (1HFY25: PKR 23,479mln), consistent with base normalization. The sales are export-oriented, with Europe as the primary destination, followed by North America and Asia. This geographic mix provides some insulation from the imposed US tariffs and benefits from sourcing diversification by international buyers. While escalating regional tensions have introduced trade route risk across the Arabian Sea, the Company's FOB transactional structure transfers freight and transit risk to the buyer at origin, limiting direct exposure. The financial risk profile is assessed as adequate, supported by stable cash generation. FCFO held at PKR 6,148mln in FY25 (FY24: PKR 6,076mln). EBITDA-based coverage improved to 4.4x in 1HFY26 (FY25: 3.7x), while FCFO-based debt service coverage remained at approximately 2.0x, leaving buffers against adverse movements in working capital or financing costs. Gearing increased to 46.8% as of 1HFY26 (FY25: 44.1%), driven by elevated short-term borrowings necessary for export-oriented working capital requirements. The equity base grew to PKR 19,415mln as of December 2025 (FY25: PKR 18,224mln), and the average borrowing cost upticked to 13.5% in 1HFY26 (FY25: 12.1%). The Company utilizes SBP's LTFF and ERF/EFS concessional financing schemes, providing subsidized borrowings and limiting the cost of borrowings. Headroom within sanctioned borrowing limits provides financial flexibility. Working capital metrics reflected some stretch in 1HFY26, with net working capital days increasing to ~92 (FY25: 63), primarily due to relatively higher inventory and receivables levels, though remaining broadly aligned with the operational profile of the segment. To diversify its funding base, the Company had issued a commercial paper in Sep’25, which was timely paid and redeemed. Alongside, the Company is also in the process of issuing another commercial paper to supplement its working capital requirements.

Key Rating Drivers

The assigned ratings are contingent on the Company's ability to sustain its operating profile while maintaining profitability metrics within the range commensurate with the current rating category. Stabilization and improvement in margin performance, alongside strengthening of cash flow-based coverage ratios, remain central to the credit assessment. Leverage management within moderate parameters is a prerequisite for rating stability. Enhancement of the corporate governance framework through the introduction of independent board oversight would reduce a qualitative constraint currently embedded in the rating.

Profile
Legal Structure

Beacon Impex (Pvt.) Limited ("the Company" or "Beacon Impex") was incorporated in Pakistan as a private limited company on December 2nd, 2005 under the Companies Ordinance 1984 (Repealed with the enactment of the Companies Act, 2017).


Background

Beacon Impex (Pvt.) Limited was incorporated in 2005 as an IT service-providing corporation. and has developed itself into a growing vertically integrated unit by setting up conversion and doubling units in 2012 and eventually entered in the garment export business in 2018.


Operations

The principal business activity of the Company is the manufacturing and sale of garments and yarn, and the trading of textile products. The Company's operations are divided into five divisions: Yarn, Elastic, Fabric, Denim, and Apparel. Beacon Impex has established a strong presence in the dedicated bodywear industry for approximately one decade, and a production of ~5.67 million garments each month. The registered office of the Company is situated at P-102 Jail Road, Faisalabad. The Company’s energy requirement stands at 9.3MW, which is primarily met through solar capacity, FESCO, and RLNG.


Ownership
Ownership Structure

The majority of the shareholding is vested with the Company's Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Muhammad Shakeel Faridi, and Director, Mr. Mudassar Zafar, along with other sponsoring shareholders. This concentrated ownership reflects strong sponsor backing and direct involvement of the top management in the strategic and operational direction of the Company.


Stability

The sponsors have a long-term association with the Company and the textile business. The next generation is also engaged in business (Mr. Muhammad Nazir Ahmed). A formal documented succession plan will augment the ownership framework of the Company.


Business Acumen

Mr. Muhammad Nazir Ahmed is considered the man of the last mile. He has been associated with the Company for the last eight years where he is playing a pivotal role in driving organizational growth and operational excellence. His expertise lies in strategic management, supply chain optimization, and fostering innovation within the textile industry.


Financial Strength

The financial strength of the Company primarily divests in a single line of business. The Sponsors of the Company are committed to supporting the Company in times of intricacy


Governance
Board Structure

Beacon Impex’s BoD consists of two members, both occupy executive roles, including the CEO, while Mr. Mudassar Zafar is designated as director. Both directors have more than 20 years of relevant experience and have been associated with the Company for the last 10 years. The inclusion of independent oversight will further improve the governance framework of the Company.


Members’ Profile

Mr. Shakeel Faridi holds a master's degree in computer sciences. The board members carry vast knowledge and extensive experiences in the textile industry. Mr. Mudassar Zafar has vast experience of more than 20 years in the textile industry and is associated with the Company since 2013.


Board Effectiveness

Three committees: Audit Committee, HR Committee, and Risk Committee, are in place to assist the board in relevant matters and ensure proper oversight.


Financial Transparency

Kreston Hyder Bhimji & Co., who are listed as category “A” on the SBP’s panel of auditors, are external auditors of the Company. They have expressed an unqualified opinion on the financial statements of the Company for the year ended June 30, 2025.


Management
Organizational Structure

The organizational structure of the Company is a well-organized, hierarchical system that ensures strong governance, clear accountability, and efficient operations. The Board of Directors exercises oversight through key committees, while the CEO maintains centralized leadership across strategic, operational, financial, and risk areas. The separation between the CSO, MD, and CFO ensures focused leadership in planning, execution, and financial management. Operational units under the MD are specialized by business areas like garments, knitting, and polyester, while support functions like Compliance, IT, and Supply Chain are integrated under the CSO. Overall, the structure promotes clarity and specialization, though maintaining inter-departmental coordination will be key as the organization grows.


Management Team

The management team is headed by the CEO. He is supported by a team of seasoned professionals, who supplement his expertise. Mr. Khalid Mehmood, the CFO, holds a master’s in business administration and has extensive experience of over 11 years under his belt.


Effectiveness

The management meetings are held periodically with the follow-up points to resolve or proactively address operational and administrative issues, if any, eventually ensuring a smooth flow of operations. The management is assisted by four committees: Business Development Committee, Corporate Social Responsibility Committee, Financial Management and Compliance Committee, and Operations Planning and Coordination Committee, ensuring strong effectiveness.


MIS

The Company has developed an in-house state-of-the-art integrated ERP system, which is designed in Oracle 6i, enabling it to efficiently monitor and control production, inventory, and quality levels.


Control Environment

Beacon Impex has built an automated and centrally integrated KPIs-based assessment dashboard system to analyze real-time facility performance and address process inefficiencies. The execution of RFID and barcodebased traceback systems has enabled the Company to access final product traceability via a single scan, which escalates the control environment. The Company has an in-house internal audit department with quarterly reporting frequency, and it is directly reportable to the audit committee.


Business Risk
Industry Dynamics

Pakistan’s textile exports improved during FY25, supported by gradual normalization in global demand and easing domestic financial conditions. Sector exports increased to USD ~17.3bln in FY25 (FY24: USD 16.7bln), reflecting a recovery led primarily by value-added segments, including garments and home textiles, while the spinning segment continued to operate under a highly competitive and margin-sensitive environment. Despite the improvement in export volumes, the operating landscape remained structurally constrained by elevated energy tariffs and the full-year impact of the Normal Tax Regime (NTR), which has materially altered post-tax profitability for export-oriented units. The imposition of corporate income tax and super tax under NTR has continued to compress net margins, particularly for low- to mid-tier spinning entities with limited pricing power and scale efficiencies. However, the progressive decline in policy rates during FY25 provided partial relief to financing costs, improving cash-flow dynamics and offering some cushion to debt-servicing metrics across the sector. In parallel, energy efficiency initiatives, particularly solarization, have emerged as a key structural differentiator, enabling relatively stronger cost positioning and margin resilience for companies with early investments in renewable energy. At the global level, evolving trade policies, shifting tariff regimes, and ongoing realignment of supply chains are expected to reshape competitive dynamics within major textile markets, particularly Europe and North America. These developments introduce both risks and selective opportunities for Pakistani exporters. While heightened competition and regulatory compliance requirements may intensify pressure on conventional suppliers, efficient spinning units aligned with quality, traceability, and sustainability standards stand to benefit from supply-chain diversification and buyer risk rebalancing. Overall, industry conditions during FY25 reflected a gradual shift toward stabilization, with future performance increasingly dependent on product mix optimization, export orientation, energy efficiency, regulatory adaptability, and financial discipline.


Relative Position

Beacon Impex has established its footprints in the dedicated bodywear industry over a time of ~01 decade. The Company has production capacity of ~5.67 million garments per month. The relative position of the Company is considered strong in the dedicated bodywear segment.


Revenues

During FY25, the Company’s revenue base witnessed a significant expansion and stood at PKR 52.6bln (FY24: PKR 36.3bln), reflecting strong growth primarily driven by improved product pricing in dollar terms and volumetric expansion in export markets. During 1HFY26, the Company recorded revenue of PKR 24.7bln (1HFY25: PKR 23.5bln), indicating continued growth momentum, albeit at a relatively moderate pace. The revenue base remains dominated by direct export sales of the bodywear segment, followed by yarn. Puma continues to be the Company’s top client, followed by Hugo Boss, Levi’s, and Amazon. Geographically, the revenue mix is led by Europe, followed by North America, Asia, and other regions.


Margins

During FY25, the Company’s profitability metrics experienced pressure, with gross margin declining to ~14.5% (FY24: 18.6%) and net margin to ~5.3% (FY24: 8.0%), primarily due to elevated raw material costs and higher finance charges. In 1HFY26, margins remained broadly stable at these levels, with gross margin at ~15.6% and net margin at ~4.8%. The continued margin compression reflects cost absorption of higher-priced inventory and elevated finance costs, with finance cost remaining a key drag on profitability.


Sustainability

The management remains focused on aligning operational performance with projected growth while continuing its strategic CAPEX cycle across the textile value chain. Over recent years, investments have been directed towards processing, garments, spinning, PET polyester, knitting, and elastic segments, supporting product diversification and vertical integration. Additionally, the Company has undertaken investments in renewable energy initiatives to mitigate energy cost risks. The operationalization of the polyester recycled fiber plant (PEICT) further strengthens the Company’s sustainability profile and positions it favorably in environmentally conscious export markets.


Financial Risk
Working capital

During 1HFY26, the Company’s working capital profile reflects some stretch, with net working capital days increasing to ~92 days (FY25: 63 days; FY24: 66 days). Similarly, gross working capital days rose to ~129 days (FY25: 100 days; FY24: 112 days), primarily due to relatively higher inventory and receivables levels. Inventory levels remain elevated to support export orders and ensure supply continuity. The Company continues to fund its working capital requirements through a mix of short-term borrowings and internally generated cash flows, reflecting ongoing reliance on bank lines.


Coverages

During FY25, the Company’s FCFO remained largely stable at PKR 6.1bln (FY24: PKR 6.1bln), with interest coverage and debt coverage standing at 3.6x and 2.0x, respectively. During 1HFY26, coverage indicators depict a mixed trend, with EBITDA-based coverage improving to ~4.4x (FY25: 3.7x), reflecting stronger operating profitability. However, cash flow-based coverage remains relatively constrained, with FCFO-based coverage hovering around ~2.0x, indicating that debt servicing capacity, while adequate, remains sensitive to finance cost and working capital dynamics.


Capitalization

The Company maintains a leveraged capital structure, with gearing increasing to ~46.1% as of 1HFY26 (FY25: 44.1%, FY24: 42.1%). The debt mix continues to be skewed towards short-term borrowings, reflecting the working capital-intensive nature of operations. Short-term borrowings have increased in line with business expansion, while the equity base has continued to grow, reaching ~PKR 19.4bln as of Dec’25 (FY25: PKR 18.2bln), supported by profit retention. Notably, the Company’s average borrowing cost declined to ~12.1% (FY25: 17.6%), providing relief to the overall financing burden despite higher leverage levels.


 
 

May-26

www.pacra.com


(PKR mln)


Dec-25
6M
Jun-25
12M
Jun-24
12M
Jun-23
12M
A. BALANCE SHEET
1. Non-Current Assets 19,448 20,077 18,557 13,035
2. Investments 144 145 148 148
3. Related Party Exposure 226 214 157 118
4. Current Assets 24,723 22,900 17,890 14,392
a. Inventories 8,171 7,018 7,328 4,412
b. Trade Receivables 9,930 9,708 4,704 5,719
5. Total Assets 44,542 43,336 36,752 27,693
6. Current Liabilities 6,556 8,131 8,042 6,136
a. Trade Payables 4,424 5,502 5,042 4,050
7. Borrowings 17,090 15,614 12,282 8,813
8. Related Party Exposure 0 0 0 0
9. Non-Current Liabilities 1,482 1,368 853 612
10. Net Assets 19,415 18,224 15,576 12,133
11. Shareholders' Equity 19,415 18,224 15,576 12,133
B. INCOME STATEMENT
1. Sales 24,686 52,640 36,274 29,413
a. Cost of Good Sold (20,836) (45,016) (29,510) (22,422)
2. Gross Profit 3,850 7,624 6,764 6,991
a. Operating Expenses (1,194) (2,110) (1,617) (1,669)
3. Operating Profit 2,656 5,514 5,147 5,321
a. Non Operating Income or (Expense) 314 293 337 (309)
4. Profit or (Loss) before Interest and Tax 2,970 5,807 5,484 5,013
a. Total Finance Cost (1,229) (1,966) (1,951) (923)
b. Taxation (550) (1,060) (621) (449)
6. Net Income Or (Loss) 1,191 2,781 2,912 3,641
C. CASH FLOW STATEMENT
a. Free Cash Flows from Operations (FCFO) 3,277 6,148 6,076 5,517
b. Net Cash from Operating Activities before Working Capital Changes 2,066 4,138 4,339 4,857
c. Changes in Working Capital (3,225) (4,475) (1,663) (3,452)
1. Net Cash provided by Operating Activities (1,159) (337) 2,675 1,405
2. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Investing Activities 160 (2,600) (5,708) (4,472)
3. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Financing Activities 1,313 3,222 3,142 3,154
4. Net Cash generated or (Used) during the period 314 286 109 88
D. RATIO ANALYSIS
1. Performance
a. Sales Growth (for the period) -6.2% 45.1% 23.3% 45.6%
b. Gross Profit Margin 15.6% 14.5% 18.6% 23.8%
c. Net Profit Margin 4.8% 5.3% 8.0% 12.4%
d. Cash Conversion Efficiency (FCFO adjusted for Working Capital/Sales) 0.2% 3.2% 12.2% 7.0%
e. Return on Equity [ Net Profit Margin * Asset Turnover * (Total Assets/Shareholders' Equity )] 12.7% 16.5% 21.0% 35.3%
2. Working Capital Management
a. Gross Working Capital (Average Days) 129 100 112 126
b. Net Working Capital (Average Days) 92 63 66 84
c. Current Ratio (Current Assets / Current Liabilities) 3.8 2.8 2.2 2.3
3. Coverages
a. EBITDA / Finance Cost 3.6 4.4 3.7 7.4
b. FCFO / Finance Cost+CMLTB+Excess STB 1.9 2.0 2.1 3.6
c. Debt Payback (Total Borrowings+Excess STB) / (FCFO-Finance Cost) 1.1 1.3 1.3 0.9
4. Capital Structure
a. Total Borrowings / (Total Borrowings+Shareholders' Equity) 46.8% 46.1% 44.1% 42.1%
b. Interest or Markup Payable (Days) 36.7 46.1 68.9 109.1
c. Entity Average Borrowing Rate 13.5% 12.1% 19.6% 11.7%

May-26

www.pacra.com

May-26

www.pacra.com

  1. Rating Team Statements
    1. Rating is just an opinion about the creditworthiness of the entity and does not constitute a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell any security of the entity rated or to buy, hold, or sell the security rated, as the case may be. (Chapter III; 14-3-(x))
    2. Conflict of Interest
      1. The Rating Team or any of their family members have no interest in this rating (Chapter III; 12-2-(j))
      2. PACRA, the analysts involved in the rating process, and members of its rating committee and their family members do not have any conflict of interest relating to the rating done by them (Chapter III; 12-2-(e) & (k))
      3. The analyst is not a substantial shareholder of the customer being rated by PACRA [Annexure F; d-(ii)]
      4. Explanation: for the purpose of the above clause, the term "family members" shall include only those family members who are dependent on the analyst and members of the rating committee.
  2. Restrictions
    1. No director, officer, or employee of PACRA communicates the information acquired by him for use for rating purposes to any other person, except where required under law to do so. (Chapter III; 10-(5))
    2. PACRA does not disclose or discuss with outside parties or make improper use of the non-public information which has come to its knowledge during a business relationship with the customer. (Chapter III; 10-7-(d))
    3. PACRA does not make proposals or recommendations regarding the activities of rated entities that could impact a credit rating of the entity subject to rating. (Chapter III; 10-7-(k))
  3. Conduct of Business
    1. PACRA fulfills its obligations in a fair, efficient, transparent, and ethical manner and renders high standards of services in performing its functions and obligations. (Chapter III; 11-A-(a))
    2. PACRA uses due care in the preparation of this Rating Report. Our information has been obtained from sources we consider to be reliable, but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. PACRA does not, in every instance, independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing this Rating Report. (Clause 11-(A)(p))
    3. PACRA prohibits its employees and analysts from soliciting money, gifts, or favors from anyone with whom PACRA conducts business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(q))
    4. PACRA ensures before the commencement of the rating process that an analyst or employee has not had a recent employment or other significant business or personal relationship with the rated entity that may cause or may be perceived as causing a conflict of interest. (Chapter III; 11-A-(r))
    5. PACRA maintains the principle of integrity in seeking rating business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(u))
    6. PACRA promptly investigates in the event of misconduct or a breach of the policies, procedures, and controls, and takes appropriate steps to rectify any weaknesses to prevent any recurrence, along with suitable punitive action against the responsible employee(s). (Chapter III; 11-B-(m))
  4. Independence & Conflict of Interest
    1. PACRA receives compensation from the entity being rated or any third party for the rating services it offers. The receipt of this compensation has no influence on PACRA’s opinions or other analytical processes. In all instances, PACRA is committed to preserving the objectivity, integrity, and independence of its ratings. Our relationship is governed by two distinct mandates: i) rating mandate - signed with the entity being rated or issuer of the debt instrument, and ii) fee mandate - signed with the payer, which can be different from the entity.
    2. PACRA does not provide consultancy/advisory services or other services to any of its customers or their associated companies and associated undertakings that are being rated or have been rated by it during the preceding three years, unless it has an adequate mechanism in place ensuring that the provision of such services does not lead to a conflict of interest situation with its rating activities. (Chapter III; 12-2-(d))
    3. PACRA discloses that no shareholder directly or indirectly holding 10% or more of the share capital of PACRA also holds directly or indirectly 10% or more of the share capital of the entity which is subject to rating or the entity which issued the instrument subject to rating by PACRA. (Chapter III; 12-2-(f))
    4. PACRA ensures that the rating assigned to an entity or instrument is not affected by the existence of a business relationship between PACRA and the entity or any other party, or the non-existence of such a relationship. (Chapter III; 12-2-(i))
    5. PACRA ensures that the analysts or any of their family members shall not buy, sell, or engage in any transaction in any security which falls in the analyst’s area of primary analytical responsibility. This clause, however, does not apply to investments in securities through collective investment schemes. (Chapter III; 12-2-(l))
    6. PACRA has established policies and procedures governing investments and trading in securities by its employees and for monitoring the same to prevent insider trading, market manipulation, or any other market abuse. (Chapter III; 11-B-(g))
  5. Monitoring and Review
    1. PACRA monitors all the outstanding ratings continuously, and any potential change therein due to any event associated with the issuer, the security arrangement, the industry, etc., is disseminated to the market immediately and in an effective manner after appropriate consultation with the entity/issuer. (Chapter III; 17-(a))
    2. PACRA reviews all the outstanding ratings periodically on an annual basis. Provided that public dissemination of annual review and in an instance of change in rating will be made. (Chapter III; 17-(b))
    3. PACRA initiates an immediate review of the outstanding rating upon becoming aware of any information that may reasonably be expected to result in downgrading of the rating. (Chapter III; 17-(c))
    4. PACRA engages with the issuer and the debt securities trustee to remain updated on all information pertaining to the rating of the entity/instrument. (Chapter III; 17-(d))
  6. Probability of Default
    1. PACRA’s Rating Scale reflects the expectation of credit risk. The highest rating has the lowest relative likelihood of default (i.e., probability). PACRA’s transition studies capture the historical performance behavior of a specific rating notch. Transition behavior of the assigned rating can be obtained from PACRA’s Transition Study available at our website. (www.pacra.com) However, the actual transition of rating may not follow the pattern observed in the past. (Chapter III; 14-3(f)(vii))
  7. Proprietary Information
    1. All information contained herein is considered proprietary by PACRA. Hence, none of the information in this document can be copied or otherwise reproduced, stored, or disseminated in whole or in part in any form or by any means whatsoever by any person without PACRA’s prior written consent.

May-26

www.pacra.com