Rating History
Dissemination Date Long-Term Rating Short-Term Rating Outlook Action Rating Watch
05-May-26 AA A1+ Stable Maintain -
05-May-25 AA A1+ Stable Upgrade -
31-May-24 A+ A1 Developing Maintain YES
01-Jun-23 A+ A1 Stable Maintain -
03-Jun-22 A+ A1 Stable Maintain -
About the Entity

Gas & Oil Pakistan Limited ('GO' or 'the Company') was incorporated as a public unlisted company in 2012 under the repealed Companies Act 2017. The Company obtained the license to operate as an OMC across Pakistan from OGRA in 2019. GO is engaged in POL procurement from the local and international markets and the storage, distribution, and marketing of petroleum products and lubricants. The Company has a ten-member Board; four members represent Aramco, and the other six are nominated by GO. Mr. Shahid Mehmood Khan chairs the Board, while Mr. Khalid Riaz heads the Company as the CEO. To enhance transparency, a few prominent management positions are appointed by Aramco. Other members of the Board and the management are also seasoned professionals.

Rating Rationale

Gas & Oil Pakistan Limited ('GO' or 'the Company') benefits from a strategic partnership with Aramco, which acquired a ~40% stake in the Company. Aramco, a globally significant player in the energy and chemicals sector. This partnership reinforces GO's expanding footprint and strengthening market position within Pakistan's OMC sector. The sponsors are financially stable and possess extensive expertise across the energy supply chain. GO's operational infrastructure reinforces its competitive positioning. The Company maintains a retail network of ~1,329 stations, including ~80 COCO sites. Critically, GO holds the second-largest storage capacity in the sector at ~205,038 MTs, a strategic asset that enhances supply reliability, supports working capital efficiency, and provides a meaningful buffer against procurement and logistics disruptions. Operations span the full POL value chain, procurement, storage, distribution, and marketing — with sourcing across both domestic and international channels. Ancillary hospitality income from retail sites provides an additional, albeit modest, revenue stream.
GO's topline trajectory in CY25 was compelling. Net revenue surged ~89% YoY to PKR 619.6bln (CY24: PKR 327.8bln), driven primarily by volumetric expansion that has firmly established the Company among the top-tier OMCs by both sales volume and retail presence. Despite a decline in margins across all levels, profitability improved on the back of strong sales growth, with scale effects offsetting underlying cost pressures. The Company’s financial risk profile remains stable, underpinned by strong cash flows and high leveraged capital structure. The Company’s trade debts, mainly constituting government entities, corporate customers, and dealers stood at ~PKR 53.4bln (CY24: ~PKR 36.4bln), a growth of ~46.7%, is substantially slower than the annualized revenue growth, reflecting prudent working capital discipline, and is further supported by the implementation of a Board-approved credit policy aimed at maintaining tighter control over receivable cycles going forward. The Company’s working capital requirements are met through conventional means, and now a new stream of commercial borrowing has been added. A substantial supplier credit extended by Aramco provides an additional cushion. Notwithstanding the significant supply chain disruptions stemming from the US-Iran conflict and the effective closure of the Strait of Hormuz, GO's topline and volumetric growth have demonstrated commendable resilience, supported by the Company's robust storage infrastructure and disciplined procurement practices.

Key Rating Drivers

The ratings are dependent on the Company’s ability to sustain its business profile, while maintaining the profitability matrix at optimal level. The sustainability of margins and improvement in coverages while expanding business volumes remain critical. Adherence to the debt matrix at a adequate level is a prerequisite for assigned ratings

Profile
Legal Structure

Gas & Oil Pakistan Limited ('GO' or 'the Company') was incorporated as an unlisted public limited company in 2012 under the erstwhile Companies Ordinance, 1984 (now called the Companies Act, 2017).


Background

The Company acquired an OMC license in 2014 and commenced operations in Punjab in 2015, with subsequent expansions in Sindh, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KPK), Gilgit Baltistan (GB), and Balochistan. The Company began its operations by providing logistics services to other oil marketing companies. It steadily built a strong logistics network that has evolved into a vital service provider for major Oil Marketing Companies (OMCs).


Operations

The Company is primarily engaged in marketing and selling petroleum products (POL). Currently, the Company operates the second largest retail network of ~1,329 stations, including ~80 company-operated company-owned (COCO) sites. To support the constantly growing retail network, the Company maintains numerous storage sites located throughout Pakistan. These sites hold a total storage footprint of ~87.5K MT for HSD and ~81.4K MT for PMG, including a dedicated storage facility at Fauji Trans Terminal Limited, with a capacity of ~36.3K MT. This enables the Company to effectively and efficiently capture its widespread customers. The Company's profile has been uplifted by the induction of Aramco.


Ownership
Ownership Structure

The Company's shareholding was initially divided among Mr. Khalid Riaz and his family and friends. However, lately, Aramco has acquired an ~40% stake in the Company. While GO holds a major stake of ~60%, out of which, Mr. Khalid holds ~51% stake in the Company.


Stability

As Aramco, headquartered in Saudi Arabia with an operational history of more than 90 years, holds a considerable equity stake in the Company, the ownership is expected to remain stable.


Business Acumen

The Company's sponsors have extensive industry experience with a significant concentration in oil & lubricant trading and distribution & transportation to OMCs all across Pakistan. Mr. Khalid, the Company's key sponsor and CEO, possesses over three decades of extensive oil distribution and trading experience. Furthermore, with the introduction of Aramco as a key sponsor and its representation on Board and its strategic management, the Company will, over time, benefit from the vast expertise of the new sponsor, improving the operational capabilities.


Financial Strength

The sponsors have a firm financial footing. Aramco (rated A+ by Fitch) has a strong financial muscle with an annual turnover of ~$ 480.5bln and total assets of ~$646.3bln, providing a comfortable financial strength to the Company.


Governance
Board Structure

The Board of Directors (BoD) comprises ten members, out of which four Directors are the representatives of Aramco. There are two Independent Director on the BoD. Overall composition of the BoD ensures diverse experience and knowledge, along with the requisite independence in the decision-making process.


Members’ Profile

The Chairman of the BoD, Mr. Shahid Mehmmod Khan, has 30+ years of multifaceted experience in the domestic and international corporate sectors. Mr. Nader D. Al Douhan is the Director of DS International Retail at Aramco, and holds over 25 years of experience in downstream, upstream, and corporate services. Other representative Directors of Aramco, Mr. Abdul Aziz, Mr. Usman Hamid and Mr. Davide Crespi also carry diversified experience of more than two decades. The induction of the Directors representing Aramco has strengthen the BoDs strategic oversight and policy formation process.


Board Effectiveness

The BoD meets on a quarterly basis with complete attendance and comprehensive documentation of minutes. Two BoD Committees, namely the Board Audit Committee (BAC) and Board HR and Compensation Committee (BHRCC), monitors the operations effectively. These Committees meet on a quarterly basis with adequate attendance. Minutes of the Committee meetings are recorded and documented adequately.


Financial Transparency

The External Auditors of the Company, M/s. PKF FRANTS has expressed an unqualified opinion on the financial statements for the period ended Dec-25. The firm is QCR-rated and listed on the SBP panel.


Management
Organizational Structure

The Company's operations are divided into three primary functional areas: i) Operations, ii) Finance, and iii) Sales. Each department is managed by a department head who reports directly to the CEO. He then reports to the Board, that makes pertinent decisions. While, the Head of Internal Audit & HR functionally reports to the respective Board Committees, and administratively to the CEO.


Management Team

Mr. Khalid Riaz, the Company's CEO, has been associated with GO for more than a decade. He has an overall experience of over three decades. Lately, Mr. Zahid Zuberi has joined as the Company's CFO, with an overall professional experience of ~3 decades. Mr. Zahid's appointment has been done in consensus with Aramco. Overall, the average experience of the senior management is of around three decades, reflecting a good management profile. The management team comprises seasoned professionals, each bringing a range of expertise in their respective fields.


Effectiveness

GO has constituted two management committees, including i) Procurement and ii) Credit. These Committees meet on a quarterly basis, and the minutes of these meetings are recorded and documented adequately. Anticipating the need for enhanced management efficacy, as Aramco joins in, management-level committees may add-in.


MIS

The senior management receives a daily performance report on operations for optimal monitoring. The Company’s operating environment has now been upgraded to SAP S/4HANA. This has effectively integrated with all the departments and ensures proper financial and operational control.


Control Environment

The Company operates an in-house internal audit department to oversee risk management, control, and governance processes. Furthermore, the quarterly are also reviewed by the external auditor This ultimately enhances business practices by establishing standard operating procedures (SOPs).


Business Risk
Industry Dynamics

Pakistan's OMC sector delivered a meaningful demand recovery in CY25, reversing two consecutive years of contraction. FY25 OMC volumes reached 16.3 million tons, up ~7% YoY. By end-CY25, gasoline, gasoil, and hi-octane sales collectively rose ~10% YoY to approximately 15.4 MMTs, supported by vehicle growth and stable underlying demand. However, volume recovery has masked deepening structural stress. Regulated pricing, persistent discounting, and rising capital requirements continue to strain sector economics, despite solid topline growth. OMC margins remain fixed in nominal terms, while working capital pressures — exacerbated by IDC and sales tax uncertainties — continue to erode real returns. The sector's import dependency was vividly stress-tested by the US-Iran conflict that escalated in early 2026. Pakistan imported nearly two-thirds of its total LNG via the Strait of Hormuz in 2025, making it acutely vulnerable to supply disruptions. As the crisis deepened, fuel shortages emerged across Asian markets, including Pakistan, exposing the sector's thin inventory buffers and absence of strategic reserves. With ~20% of global oil trade transiting the Strait, any prolonged closure structurally threatens Pakistan's import-dependent POL supply chain


Relative Position

The Company captured ~13% market share based on the sale of POL products and is positioned at 2nd among OMCs as of Dec-24. GO is the second biggest OMC in terms of retail networks operating across Pakistan


Revenues

GO Petroleum's revenue base expanded significantly in CY25, with net revenue growing ~89% YoY to PKR 619.7bln (CY24: PKR 327.8bln). The growth was predominantly volume-driven, reflecting the Company's aggressive market share capture in an otherwise margin-compressed sector. Revenue is diversified across HSD (~50%) and MS (~49%), with HOBC contributing a marginal ~1% — a mix that closely mirrors Pakistan's broader white oil demand structure and leaves the Company exposed to any structural shift in transport fuel consumption patterns.


Margins

Despite robust topline growth, margin compression across all levels warrants attention. Gross margins contracted to ~3.5% (CY24: ~5.4%), indicative of elevated procurement costs that the Company was unable to fully pass through under the regulated pricing regime. Operating margins similarly declined to ~2.1% (CY24: ~3.6%), reflecting a disproportionate increase in selling and marketing expenses — suggesting the volume growth came at a meaningful cost to operating efficiency. Net margins thinned further to ~0.8% (CY24: ~1.0%), though absolute net income grew ~39% YoY to PKR 4.6bln (CY24: PKR 3.6bln), underscoring that scale is currently compensating for structural margin erosion.


Sustainability

The Aramco partnership represents the most consequential strategic development for the Company. Beyond brand equity, the alliance has tangibly strengthened GO's supply chain infrastructure and reinforced its balance sheet — critical advantages in a sector where working capital management and procurement reliability are primary competitive differentiators. Aramco's integrated positioning across upstream, midstream, and downstream segments offers GO a structurally superior supply arrangement relative to peers. Looking ahead, the volume growth trajectory appears credible, supported by the Company's distribution expansion and Aramco's commercial backing. However, margin recovery will be the key monitorable — sustained improvement in profitability will depend on procurement cost normalization, disciplined management of operating expenses, and any regulatory revision to OMC margins


Financial Risk
Working capital

The Company's financial risk is gauged through its working capital management, the Company's ability to build a suitable interest cover, and its capital structure. GO has worked on its working capital management as reflected by an improved net working cycle to ~13 days in CY25 (CY24: ~20 days). This improvement primarily stems from a notable decline in trade receivables days from ~35 days in CY24 to ~26 days in CY25, highlighting improved credit terms for product import provided by Aramco The inventory turnover days increased to ~38 days (CY24: ~36 days), it was primarily due to a significant increase in the Company's inventory levels (CY25: ~PKR 78.5bln, CY24: ~PKR 49.1bln) to support its enhanced operations.  The Company’s trade debts, mainly constituting government entities, corporate customers, and dealers stood at ~PKR 53.4bln (CY24: ~PKR 36.4bln), a growth of ~46.7%, is substantially slower than the annualized revenue growth, reflecting prudent working capital discipline, and is further supported by the implementation of a Board-approved credit policy aimed at maintaining tighter control over receivable cycles going forward.


Coverages

As of CY25, the Company reported FCFO at ~PKR 11.6bln, reflecting a decline of ~11.7% (CY24: PKR ~13.2bln). The Company’s interest coverage Ratio improved to ~1.9x in CY25 (CY24: ~1.7x), attributed to declining finance costs amounted to ~PKR 7.5bln (CY24: ~PKR 8.2bln)


Capitalization

The Company reported a significant change in its leverage. As of CY25, the leverage ratio of the Company declined to ~56.5% (CY24: ~49.5%). The Company's total equity rose to ~PKR 38.6bln for CY25 compared to ~PKR 32.4bln for CY24. Likewise, the Company’s borrowing book inclined to ~PKR 50.1bln in CY25 (CY24: ~PKR 31.7bln); majorly concentrated with STBs ~PKR 38.1bln in CY25 (CY24: ~PKR 24.1bln) for working capital management. Capital adequacy of the Company is expected to remain strong, going forward


 
 

May-26

www.pacra.com


(PKR mln)


Dec-25
12M
Dec-24
12M
Dec-23
12M
A. BALANCE SHEET
1. Non-Current Assets 43,900 31,460 27,797
2. Investments 0 0 0
3. Related Party Exposure 0 205 1,664
4. Current Assets 156,723 113,264 66,918
a. Inventories 78,480 49,047 16,208
b. Trade Receivables 53,419 36,379 26,383
5. Total Assets 200,623 144,929 96,379
6. Current Liabilities 111,166 80,198 27,630
a. Trade Payables 101,355 72,295 19,054
7. Borrowings 50,095 31,724 49,572
8. Related Party Exposure 0 0 0
9. Non-Current Liabilities 730 649 751
10. Net Assets 38,631 32,357 18,426
11. Shareholders' Equity 38,631 32,357 18,426
B. INCOME STATEMENT
1. Sales 619,919 327,831 240,918
a. Cost of Good Sold (598,367) (310,102) (215,643)
2. Gross Profit 21,552 17,730 25,275
a. Operating Expenses (8,625) (5,799) (5,142)
3. Operating Profit 12,928 11,931 20,133
a. Non Operating Income or (Expense) (12) 302 (6,709)
4. Profit or (Loss) before Interest and Tax 12,916 12,233 13,424
a. Total Finance Cost (7,536) (8,180) (11,273)
b. Taxation (702) (694) (519)
6. Net Income Or (Loss) 4,677 3,359 1,632
C. CASH FLOW STATEMENT
a. Free Cash Flows from Operations (FCFO) 11,631 13,182 13,732
b. Net Cash from Operating Activities before Working Capital Changes 6,034 13,182 13,732
c. Changes in Working Capital (14,321) 16,630 (15,098)
1. Net Cash provided by Operating Activities (8,288) 29,812 (1,366)
2. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Investing Activities (6,940) (4,782) (1,163)
3. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Financing Activities 14,237 (15,023) 1,066
4. Net Cash generated or (Used) during the period (990) 10,007 (1,463)
D. RATIO ANALYSIS
1. Performance
a. Sales Growth (for the period) 89.1% 36.1% -25.8%
b. Gross Profit Margin 3.5% 5.4% 10.5%
c. Net Profit Margin 0.8% 1.0% 0.7%
d. Cash Conversion Efficiency (FCFO adjusted for Working Capital/Sales) -0.4% 9.1% -0.6%
e. Return on Equity [ Net Profit Margin * Asset Turnover * (Total Assets/Shareholders' Equity )] 13.2% 13.2% 9.3%
2. Working Capital Management
a. Gross Working Capital (Average Days) 64 71 67
b. Net Working Capital (Average Days) 13 20 30
c. Current Ratio (Current Assets / Current Liabilities) 1.4 1.4 2.4
3. Coverages
a. EBITDA / Finance Cost 2.3 1.8 1.4
b. FCFO / Finance Cost+CMLTB+Excess STB 1.5 1.5 1.0
c. Debt Payback (Total Borrowings+Excess STB) / (FCFO-Finance Cost) 2.2 1.4 3.4
4. Capital Structure
a. Total Borrowings / (Total Borrowings+Shareholders' Equity) 56.5% 49.5% 72.9%
b. Interest or Markup Payable (Days) 22.4 21.1 86.4
c. Entity Average Borrowing Rate 13.3% 20.4% 24.5%

May-26

www.pacra.com

May-26

www.pacra.com

  1. Rating Team Statements
    1. Rating is just an opinion about the creditworthiness of the entity and does not constitute a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell any security of the entity rated or to buy, hold, or sell the security rated, as the case may be. (Chapter III; 14-3-(x))
    2. Conflict of Interest
      1. The Rating Team or any of their family members have no interest in this rating (Chapter III; 12-2-(j))
      2. PACRA, the analysts involved in the rating process, and members of its rating committee and their family members do not have any conflict of interest relating to the rating done by them (Chapter III; 12-2-(e) & (k))
      3. The analyst is not a substantial shareholder of the customer being rated by PACRA [Annexure F; d-(ii)]
      4. Explanation: for the purpose of the above clause, the term "family members" shall include only those family members who are dependent on the analyst and members of the rating committee.
  2. Restrictions
    1. No director, officer, or employee of PACRA communicates the information acquired by him for use for rating purposes to any other person, except where required under law to do so. (Chapter III; 10-(5))
    2. PACRA does not disclose or discuss with outside parties or make improper use of the non-public information which has come to its knowledge during a business relationship with the customer. (Chapter III; 10-7-(d))
    3. PACRA does not make proposals or recommendations regarding the activities of rated entities that could impact a credit rating of the entity subject to rating. (Chapter III; 10-7-(k))
  3. Conduct of Business
    1. PACRA fulfills its obligations in a fair, efficient, transparent, and ethical manner and renders high standards of services in performing its functions and obligations. (Chapter III; 11-A-(a))
    2. PACRA uses due care in the preparation of this Rating Report. Our information has been obtained from sources we consider to be reliable, but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. PACRA does not, in every instance, independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing this Rating Report. (Clause 11-(A)(p))
    3. PACRA prohibits its employees and analysts from soliciting money, gifts, or favors from anyone with whom PACRA conducts business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(q))
    4. PACRA ensures before the commencement of the rating process that an analyst or employee has not had a recent employment or other significant business or personal relationship with the rated entity that may cause or may be perceived as causing a conflict of interest. (Chapter III; 11-A-(r))
    5. PACRA maintains the principle of integrity in seeking rating business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(u))
    6. PACRA promptly investigates in the event of misconduct or a breach of the policies, procedures, and controls, and takes appropriate steps to rectify any weaknesses to prevent any recurrence, along with suitable punitive action against the responsible employee(s). (Chapter III; 11-B-(m))
  4. Independence & Conflict of Interest
    1. PACRA receives compensation from the entity being rated or any third party for the rating services it offers. The receipt of this compensation has no influence on PACRA’s opinions or other analytical processes. In all instances, PACRA is committed to preserving the objectivity, integrity, and independence of its ratings. Our relationship is governed by two distinct mandates: i) rating mandate - signed with the entity being rated or issuer of the debt instrument, and ii) fee mandate - signed with the payer, which can be different from the entity.
    2. PACRA does not provide consultancy/advisory services or other services to any of its customers or their associated companies and associated undertakings that are being rated or have been rated by it during the preceding three years, unless it has an adequate mechanism in place ensuring that the provision of such services does not lead to a conflict of interest situation with its rating activities. (Chapter III; 12-2-(d))
    3. PACRA discloses that no shareholder directly or indirectly holding 10% or more of the share capital of PACRA also holds directly or indirectly 10% or more of the share capital of the entity which is subject to rating or the entity which issued the instrument subject to rating by PACRA. (Chapter III; 12-2-(f))
    4. PACRA ensures that the rating assigned to an entity or instrument is not affected by the existence of a business relationship between PACRA and the entity or any other party, or the non-existence of such a relationship. (Chapter III; 12-2-(i))
    5. PACRA ensures that the analysts or any of their family members shall not buy, sell, or engage in any transaction in any security which falls in the analyst’s area of primary analytical responsibility. This clause, however, does not apply to investments in securities through collective investment schemes. (Chapter III; 12-2-(l))
    6. PACRA has established policies and procedures governing investments and trading in securities by its employees and for monitoring the same to prevent insider trading, market manipulation, or any other market abuse. (Chapter III; 11-B-(g))
  5. Monitoring and Review
    1. PACRA monitors all the outstanding ratings continuously, and any potential change therein due to any event associated with the issuer, the security arrangement, the industry, etc., is disseminated to the market immediately and in an effective manner after appropriate consultation with the entity/issuer. (Chapter III; 17-(a))
    2. PACRA reviews all the outstanding ratings periodically on an annual basis. Provided that public dissemination of annual review and in an instance of change in rating will be made. (Chapter III; 17-(b))
    3. PACRA initiates an immediate review of the outstanding rating upon becoming aware of any information that may reasonably be expected to result in downgrading of the rating. (Chapter III; 17-(c))
    4. PACRA engages with the issuer and the debt securities trustee to remain updated on all information pertaining to the rating of the entity/instrument. (Chapter III; 17-(d))
  6. Probability of Default
    1. PACRA’s Rating Scale reflects the expectation of credit risk. The highest rating has the lowest relative likelihood of default (i.e., probability). PACRA’s transition studies capture the historical performance behavior of a specific rating notch. Transition behavior of the assigned rating can be obtained from PACRA’s Transition Study available at our website. (www.pacra.com) However, the actual transition of rating may not follow the pattern observed in the past. (Chapter III; 14-3(f)(vii))
  7. Proprietary Information
    1. All information contained herein is considered proprietary by PACRA. Hence, none of the information in this document can be copied or otherwise reproduced, stored, or disseminated in whole or in part in any form or by any means whatsoever by any person without PACRA’s prior written consent.

May-26

www.pacra.com