Rating History
Dissemination Date Long-Term Rating Short-Term Rating Outlook Action Rating Watch
19-Mar-26 BBB+ A2 Stable Maintain -
21-Mar-25 BBB+ A2 Stable Upgrade -
30-Mar-24 BBB A2 Positive Maintain -
03-Apr-23 BBB A2 Stable Initial -
About the Entity

Mount Fuji Textiles Limited (“MFTL” or “the Company”) is a Public (unlisted) Limited Company incorporated in 1986. The major shareholding of the Company is owned by Mr. Ahmed Ashraf (28.57%) and the remaining is distributed between his three sons. The sponsors-dominated board comprised of four members, including the Chairman - Mr. Ahmed Ashraf, and the CEO – Mr. Abdul Latif Ashraf.

Rating Rationale

The ratings of Mount Fuji Textiles Limited (“MFTL” or “the Company”) reflect its sustained business fundamentals, supported by a growing export-led revenue base and a diversified product slate. The Company’s product portfolio primarily comprises garments, including zippers and hoodies, as well as home textile products, primarily bedsheets. The sponsors’ continued focus on operational expansion and cost rationalization bodes well for the assigned ratings. MFTL’s international client base remains diversified across multiple export markets, with Poland, Germany, the United Kingdom, and the United States continuing to be the key destinations. The sales mix registered a shift in favor of domestic markets, with ~60% in exports during the 1HFY26 (FY25: ~80%, FY24: ~83%). The Company generated sales of PKR 10.3bln in FY25 (FY24: PKR 9.6bln). However, it recorded a slight contraction in its gross profit margin, underpinned by elevated input costs. The operating margin improved, reflecting prudent operating efficiency. The net margin ticked down to ~1.1% from ~1.2% in FY24. During 6MFY26, the Company generated sales of PKR 5.9bln, compared with PKR 5.7bln SPLY, indicating continued business traction during the ongoing year. The gross profit margin constricted to ~15.1%, compared with ~19.0% in 6MFY25 and the net margin moderated to ~0.7%, compared with ~1.3% SPLY. The decline in profitability during 6MFY26 is primarily attributable to elevated other expenses and transition towards the normal tax regime. Overall, margins remained under pressure, though the improvement in operating profitability indicates some support from better cost absorption and operational discipline. Finance costs remained contained during the period, aligning with the ongoing monetary easing observed during the review period. To mitigate energy-related pressures and improve efficiency, the Company has undertaken CAPEX, including the installation of solar panels, while further expansion through the approved dyeing facility is expected to support cost optimization over the medium term. The management remains focused on sustaining growth while improving efficiency and profitability. Governance oversight continues to rest with the sponsoring family, who remain actively involved in executive management and provide relevant industry expertise. The Company’s financial risk profile remains adequate, supported by a moderately leveraged capital structure, which is mainly skewed towards a short-term financing mix. As of 6MFY26, working capital management remained comfortable, with improved liquidity and an adequate cushion to support operations. Although profitability remained modest due to margin pressure and higher taxation, the Company continued to post positive earnings and maintain stable operations. Ongoing emphasis on process optimization, internal controls, and cost efficiency is expected to further strengthen the overall control environment. Despite sector-wide margin challenges, the Company has demonstrated resilience through steady volumes and sustained export-led operations.

Key Rating Drivers

The ratings are dependent upon the Company’s prudent management of working capital requirements. Improvement in coverages, sustainability of margin and sufficient generation of cash flows from core operations, while expanding business volumes remain vital. The governance framework of the Company can be improved. Adherence to the debt matrix at an optimal level is a prerequisite for assigned ratings.

Profile
Legal Structure

Mount Fuji Textile Limited (‘Mount Fuji’ or ‘the Company’) is a Public (unlisted) Limited Company. It was incorporated in Karachi, Pakistan on August 12, 1986.


Background

Over the years, Mount Fuji has steadily expanded its operations, diversifying its expertise across multiple stages of the manufacturing process. With a strong foundation in production excellence, the Company has continuously evolved to meet market demands. As part of its growth strategy, Mount Fuji has successfully ventured into the garments segment, further strengthening its presence in the industry and broadening its portfolio of high-quality products.


Operations

The principal activity of the Company is the manufacturing and export of garments and home textile products distributed among its three units. The Company has five sectional warping machines of 1000 creels each with a warping capacity of approximately two million meters a month. The Company has a weaving facility of 138 Sulzer and 84 Airjet Looms with a weaving capacity of approximately 3.5mln picks a day. The Company has 15 knitting machines, 2 raising machines, 846 computerized sewing machines & 19 cutting machines. The energy requirement stands at 1.5 MW, primarily met through solar capacity and K-electric. The registered office is located at D-148 Sindh Industrial Estate (S.I.T.E) Karachi.


Ownership
Ownership Structure

The ownership of the Company rests with Mr. Ashraf's family including his sons. The major shareholding is owned by Mr. Ahmed Ashraf (28.57%), while the remaining is equally distributed between his sons, Mr. Abdul Latif Ashraf, Mr. Muhammad Ashraf, and Mr. Shehzad Ashraf.


Stability

The Company was established to facilitate the transfer of technical and business expertise from the first generation to the second generation of the Ashraf family. It integrates the experience and guidance of the founding generation with the leadership of the next generation. While a formal succession plan has not yet been announced, the establishment of the formal family constitution will augment the ownership profile of the Company.


Business Acumen

The directors and management possess extensive expertise and a wealth of experience in the textile industry, having successfully led the organization for 38 years. Committed to its core philosophy, the Company strives for sustainable growth while upholding operational excellence and adhering to industry best practices.


Financial Strength

The sponsoring family has been involved in multiple businesses for more than 20 years. The family is involved in textile & garment manufacturing. This indicates sponsors’ ability to provide support if the need arises.


Governance
Board Structure

Mount Fuji’s board comprises four members, including the Chairman - Mr. Ahmed Ashraf, and the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) – Mr. Abdul Latif Ashraf. There are no independent directors on the board. The board is dominated by sponsor-family members and lacks independent oversight. The inclusion of independent oversight will enhance the governance profile of the Company.


Members’ Profile

Mr. Ahmed Ashraf, the Chairman of the Company, is a distinguished leader in the textile industry with over five decades of extensive experience. His journey in the sector began in the 1960s when he established Ashraf Trading Corporation, earning a reputation for reliability in textile exports. In 1986, he further demonstrated his strategic vision by founding Mount Fuji Textiles Limited, reinforcing his commitment to industry excellence and growth.


Board Effectiveness

No formal board committees have been established by the Company. BOD meetings are held regularly in which discussion on various aspects is recorded in minutes and decisions or actions are referred to the CEO, Mr. Abdul Latif Ashraf. The establishment of sub-committees will augment the board's effectiveness.


Financial Transparency

BDO Ebrahim & Co, Chartered Accountants, is the external auditor of the Company. The auditors fall under the category' A' of SBP’s panel of auditors. The auditor has expressed an unqualified opinion on the financial reports for the year ending 30th June 2025.


Management
Organizational Structure

Mount Fuji Textiles Limited follows a hierarchical structure with the Chairman at the top, followed by the CEO, Managing Director, and COO, ensuring centralized decision-making. Abdul Rasheed Vayani, CFO & Company Secretary, is a seasoned finance professional with over 44 years of experience in financial management, corporate governance, and compliance. A Fellow Cost and Management Accountant (FCMA), he has been associated with the Company since 1996 and has served in his current role for the past 13 years, reporting directly to the CEO. The Company is functionally divided into Marketing & Operations, Production, Weaving, and Hub Management, each led by a General Manager for specialized efficiency. Financial oversight is managed by the CFO, with key roles in Accounts, Treasury, Inventory Management, and Internal Audit, ensuring governance and risk control. A dedicated Procurement, Admin/HR, and Compliance function enhances regulatory adherence and resource management. The presence of Export and Import Managers indicates a focus on international trade. This structure fosters operational efficiency, clear responsibilities, and seamless coordination, making it well-suited for a large manufacturing enterprise.


Management Team

Mr. Abdul Latif Ashraf – CEO – holds a Master’s degree and has been in the Textile business for the last two decades. He has been associated with the Company since 2001. Mr. Muhammad Ashraf – the managing director – holds a Master’s Degree from Karachi. He has been in the Textile Business for the last one and a half decades. He looks after all types of Procurement & Marketing and has been associated with the Company since 2007. Mr. Shehzad Ashraf – the executive director – holds a Master’s Degree from the U.K. He is looking at the Finance and Admin department. He has been in the Textile Business for the last five years.


Effectiveness

Mount Fujii does not have established formal management committees. However, various reports pertaining to the Company's sales and inventory movements, as well as purchases and procurement activities, are prepared and submitted to senior management as required.


MIS

The Company has built an in-house ERP to cater to its business needs. The senior management monitors the business performance through certain key MIS reports.


Control Environment

Production is completely order driven, there is a rigorous quality check done on the end product by the QC department. The Company has obtained ISO 9001, ISO 14001, GSV, BICI, OEKO-TEX, WCA, Sedex, & & SQP certifications.


Business Risk
Industry Dynamics

Pakistan’s textile exports rose to USD ~17.9bln in FY25, recording a ~7.4% YoY growth, driven predominantly by value-added segments. Knitwear (USD ~5.0bln), readymade garments (USD ~4.1bln), and bedwear (USD ~3.1bln) collectively contributed over two-thirds of total exports, while cotton yarn and cotton cloth exports continued to decline, reflecting structural inefficiencies and high energy costs. During 5MFY26, export momentum moderated, with ~2.7% YoY growth, led by garments and knitwear. On the supply side, domestic cotton production fell sharply by ~30.7% YoY in FY25, resulting in a ~54.9% YoY surge in textile imports to USD ~4.2bln, primarily due to raw cotton. Import reliance eased in 5MFY26, with raw cotton imports declining by ~31.4% YoY, supported by improved arrivals and the withdrawal of sales tax exemption on imported cotton under the Finance Act 2025. Profitability dynamics weakened following the shift from the Final Tax Regime to the Normal Tax Regime, exposing exporters to a 29% corporate tax and super tax of up to 10%. However, the sharp decline in policy rates to ~10.5% by Dec’25, alongside subsidized export financing, has begun to stabilize margins and improve financial metrics, as reflected in the profitability rebound during 1QFY26. Overall, value-added exports and easing monetary conditions are partially offsetting persistent cost and policy pressures, supporting a cautiously stable industry outlook.


Relative Position

The Company has five sectional warping machines of 1000 creels each with a warping capacity of approximately two million meters a month. The company has also a weaving facility of 138 Sulzer and 84 air jet looms with weaving capacity of approximately 3.5 million picks a day. The Company has 15 knitting machines, 2 raising machines, 846 computerized sewing machines & 19 cutting machines. Considering this, the relative position of the Company is considered a low to mid-tier textile player in the overall textile sector.


Revenues

During ~6MFY26, the Company's revenue stood at ~PKR5.9bln, compared with ~PKR5.7bln in ~6MFY25. In FY25, the Company's revenue stood at ~PKR10.3bln. A significant portion of the revenue continues to be generated from export sales, which stood at ~PKR3.5bln during ~6MFY26. Meanwhile, local sales stood at ~PKR2.3bln during ~6MFY26. The Company maintains a diversified product portfolio, offering home textile products such as curtains, bedsheets, and comforters, along with woven and knitted garments. The Company’s export-oriented operations remain a key driver of its revenue base.


Margins

During ~6MFY26, the Company reported a gross profit of ~PKR888mln, compared with ~PKR1.1bln in ~6MFY25. In FY25, gross profit stood at ~PKR1.7bln. Consequently, the gross profit margin stood at ~15.1% during ~6MFY26, compared with ~19.0% in ~6MFY25, while it stood at ~16.0% in FY25. The operating profit margin stood at ~6.6% during ~6MFY26, compared with ~8.4% in ~6MFY25. In FY25, the operating profit margin stood at ~5.9%. The finance cost of the Company stood at ~PKR143mln during ~6MFY26, compared with ~PKR192mln in ~6MFY25, while it stood at ~PKR388mln in FY25. Thus, the Company’s net profit clocked at ~PKR42mln during ~6MFY26, compared with ~PKR73mln in ~6MFY25. In FY25, net profit stood at ~PKR116mln, while the net profit margin stood at ~0.7% during ~6MFY26, compared with ~1.3% in ~6MFY25 and ~1.1% in FY25, reflecting relatively lower profitability during the current period.


Sustainability

In line with improving the business environment and mitigating the risk of escalating energy costs, the Company has installed ~1MW of solar capacity. The Company’s energy cost-to-sales ratio stood at ~6.3% (FY25: ~6.3%), which is expected to improve going forward. The rating team further noted that the Company intends to add a dyeing facility to enhance operational efficiency and strengthen its product value chain.


Financial Risk
Working capital

During ~6MFY26, the Company’s net working capital days stood at ~112 days, compared with ~90 days in ~6MFY25. In FY25, net working capital days stood at ~108 days. The inventory days stood at ~82 days during ~6MFY26, compared with ~99 days in ~6MFY25. The receivables days stood at ~66 days during ~6MFY26, compared with ~53 days in ~6MFY25. On the other hand, the Company’s short-term trade leverage stood at ~-6.3% during ~6MFY26, compared with ~13.1% in ~6MFY25. In FY25, short-term trade leverage stood at ~17.2%, reflecting changes in the working capital structure during the period.


Coverages

In ~6MFY26, the FCFO of the Company stood at ~PKR373mln, compared with ~PKR144mln in ~6MFY25. In FY25, FCFO stood at ~PKR158mln, supported by operating cash generation. Consequently, the interest coverage ratio improved to ~3.3x during ~6MFY26, compared with ~0.8x in ~6MFY25, while it stood at ~0.4x in FY25. The debt coverage ratio strengthened to ~2.8x during ~6MFY26, compared with ~0.8x in ~6MFY25, while it stood at ~0.3x in FY25. The finance cost of the Company stood at ~PKR143mln during ~6MFY26, compared with ~PKR192mln in ~6MFY25 and ~PKR388mln in FY25.


Capitalization

During ~6MFY26, the Company’s leverage stood at ~36.4%, compared with ~29.1% in ~6MFY25. In FY25, leverage stood at ~40.2%. Short-term borrowings constituted ~82.3% of total borrowings during ~6MFY26, compared with ~77.3% in ~6MFY25, and stood at ~PKR3.9bln, compared with ~PKR2.7bln in ~6MFY25. In FY25, short-term borrowings stood at ~PKR3.3bln. The overall borrowings of the Company stood at ~PKR4.7bln during ~6MFY26, compared with ~PKR3.4bln in ~6MFY25, while they stood at ~PKR4.3bln in FY25. Meanwhile, the equity base of the Company stood at ~PKR8.4bln during ~6MFY26, compared with ~PKR8.6bln in ~6MFY25, while it stood at ~PKR6.8bln in FY25.


 
 

Mar-26

www.pacra.com


(PKR mln)


Dec-25
6M
Jun-25
12M
Jun-24
12M
Jun-23
12M
A. BALANCE SHEET
1. Non-Current Assets 8,099 8,001 8,315 3,824
2. Investments 538 17 100 121
3. Related Party Exposure 0 0 0 0
4. Current Assets 5,597 6,820 5,736 3,784
a. Inventories 1,562 3,737 2,882 1,660
b. Trade Receivables 2,445 1,814 1,730 1,406
5. Total Assets 14,234 14,837 14,150 7,728
6. Current Liabilities 981 2,180 2,770 1,631
a. Trade Payables 663 1,696 2,358 1,373
7. Borrowings 4,732 4,331 3,196 2,645
8. Related Party Exposure 88 262 235 235
9. Non-Current Liabilities 0 1,221 1,221 65
10. Net Assets 8,434 6,844 6,727 3,153
11. Shareholders' Equity 8,434 6,844 6,727 3,153
B. INCOME STATEMENT
1. Sales 5,878 10,328 9,645 6,732
a. Cost of Good Sold (4,990) (8,674) (7,940) (5,847)
2. Gross Profit 888 1,654 1,705 886
a. Operating Expenses (502) (1,045) (936) (708)
3. Operating Profit 386 609 769 178
a. Non Operating Income or (Expense) (136) (62) (111) 339
4. Profit or (Loss) before Interest and Tax 251 547 658 517
a. Total Finance Cost (143) (388) (434) (292)
b. Taxation (66) (42) (110) (101)
6. Net Income Or (Loss) 42 116 114 124
C. CASH FLOW STATEMENT
a. Free Cash Flows from Operations (FCFO) 373 158 956 28
b. Net Cash from Operating Activities before Working Capital Changes 373 158 450 351
c. Changes in Working Capital 0 0 (647) 119
1. Net Cash provided by Operating Activities 373 158 (197) 471
2. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Investing Activities 0 0 (189) (79)
3. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Financing Activities 0 0 551 (527)
4. Net Cash generated or (Used) during the period 373 158 166 (135)
D. RATIO ANALYSIS
1. Performance
a. Sales Growth (for the period) 13.8% 7.1% 43.3% 0.0%
b. Gross Profit Margin 15.1% 16.0% 17.7% 13.2%
c. Net Profit Margin 0.7% 1.1% 1.2% 1.8%
d. Cash Conversion Efficiency (FCFO adjusted for Working Capital/Sales) 6.3% 1.5% 3.2% 2.2%
e. Return on Equity [ Net Profit Margin * Asset Turnover * (Total Assets/Shareholders' Equity )] 1.1% 1.7% 2.3% 3.9%
2. Working Capital Management
a. Gross Working Capital (Average Days) 148 180 219 N/A
b. Net Working Capital (Average Days) 112 108 148 2
c. Current Ratio (Current Assets / Current Liabilities) 5.7 3.1 2.1 2.3
3. Coverages
a. EBITDA / Finance Cost 3.3 0.4 2.7 0.5
b. FCFO / Finance Cost+CMLTB+Excess STB 2.8 0.3 1.6 0.1
c. Debt Payback (Total Borrowings+Excess STB) / (FCFO-Finance Cost) 1.8 -5.2 2.1 -5.3
4. Capital Structure
a. Total Borrowings / (Total Borrowings+Shareholders' Equity) 36.4% 40.2% 33.8% 47.7%
b. Interest or Markup Payable (Days) 0.0 90.3 111.1 92.6
c. Entity Average Borrowing Rate 6.1% 9.4% 13.1% 9.0%

Mar-26

www.pacra.com

Mar-26

www.pacra.com

  1. Rating Team Statements
    1. Rating is just an opinion about the creditworthiness of the entity and does not constitute a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell any security of the entity rated or to buy, hold, or sell the security rated, as the case may be. (Chapter III; 14-3-(x))
    2. Conflict of Interest
      1. The Rating Team or any of their family members have no interest in this rating (Chapter III; 12-2-(j))
      2. PACRA, the analysts involved in the rating process, and members of its rating committee and their family members do not have any conflict of interest relating to the rating done by them (Chapter III; 12-2-(e) & (k))
      3. The analyst is not a substantial shareholder of the customer being rated by PACRA [Annexure F; d-(ii)]
      4. Explanation: for the purpose of the above clause, the term "family members" shall include only those family members who are dependent on the analyst and members of the rating committee.
  2. Restrictions
    1. No director, officer, or employee of PACRA communicates the information acquired by him for use for rating purposes to any other person, except where required under law to do so. (Chapter III; 10-(5))
    2. PACRA does not disclose or discuss with outside parties or make improper use of the non-public information which has come to its knowledge during a business relationship with the customer. (Chapter III; 10-7-(d))
    3. PACRA does not make proposals or recommendations regarding the activities of rated entities that could impact a credit rating of the entity subject to rating. (Chapter III; 10-7-(k))
  3. Conduct of Business
    1. PACRA fulfills its obligations in a fair, efficient, transparent, and ethical manner and renders high standards of services in performing its functions and obligations. (Chapter III; 11-A-(a))
    2. PACRA uses due care in the preparation of this Rating Report. Our information has been obtained from sources we consider to be reliable, but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. PACRA does not, in every instance, independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing this Rating Report. (Clause 11-(A)(p))
    3. PACRA prohibits its employees and analysts from soliciting money, gifts, or favors from anyone with whom PACRA conducts business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(q))
    4. PACRA ensures before the commencement of the rating process that an analyst or employee has not had a recent employment or other significant business or personal relationship with the rated entity that may cause or may be perceived as causing a conflict of interest. (Chapter III; 11-A-(r))
    5. PACRA maintains the principle of integrity in seeking rating business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(u))
    6. PACRA promptly investigates in the event of misconduct or a breach of the policies, procedures, and controls, and takes appropriate steps to rectify any weaknesses to prevent any recurrence, along with suitable punitive action against the responsible employee(s). (Chapter III; 11-B-(m))
  4. Independence & Conflict of Interest
    1. PACRA receives compensation from the entity being rated or any third party for the rating services it offers. The receipt of this compensation has no influence on PACRA’s opinions or other analytical processes. In all instances, PACRA is committed to preserving the objectivity, integrity, and independence of its ratings. Our relationship is governed by two distinct mandates: i) rating mandate - signed with the entity being rated or issuer of the debt instrument, and ii) fee mandate - signed with the payer, which can be different from the entity.
    2. PACRA does not provide consultancy/advisory services or other services to any of its customers or their associated companies and associated undertakings that are being rated or have been rated by it during the preceding three years, unless it has an adequate mechanism in place ensuring that the provision of such services does not lead to a conflict of interest situation with its rating activities. (Chapter III; 12-2-(d))
    3. PACRA discloses that no shareholder directly or indirectly holding 10% or more of the share capital of PACRA also holds directly or indirectly 10% or more of the share capital of the entity which is subject to rating or the entity which issued the instrument subject to rating by PACRA. (Chapter III; 12-2-(f))
    4. PACRA ensures that the rating assigned to an entity or instrument is not affected by the existence of a business relationship between PACRA and the entity or any other party, or the non-existence of such a relationship. (Chapter III; 12-2-(i))
    5. PACRA ensures that the analysts or any of their family members shall not buy, sell, or engage in any transaction in any security which falls in the analyst’s area of primary analytical responsibility. This clause, however, does not apply to investments in securities through collective investment schemes. (Chapter III; 12-2-(l))
    6. PACRA has established policies and procedures governing investments and trading in securities by its employees and for monitoring the same to prevent insider trading, market manipulation, or any other market abuse. (Chapter III; 11-B-(g))
  5. Monitoring and Review
    1. PACRA monitors all the outstanding ratings continuously, and any potential change therein due to any event associated with the issuer, the security arrangement, the industry, etc., is disseminated to the market immediately and in an effective manner after appropriate consultation with the entity/issuer. (Chapter III; 17-(a))
    2. PACRA reviews all the outstanding ratings periodically on an annual basis. Provided that public dissemination of annual review and in an instance of change in rating will be made. (Chapter III; 17-(b))
    3. PACRA initiates an immediate review of the outstanding rating upon becoming aware of any information that may reasonably be expected to result in downgrading of the rating. (Chapter III; 17-(c))
    4. PACRA engages with the issuer and the debt securities trustee to remain updated on all information pertaining to the rating of the entity/instrument. (Chapter III; 17-(d))
  6. Probability of Default
    1. PACRA’s Rating Scale reflects the expectation of credit risk. The highest rating has the lowest relative likelihood of default (i.e., probability). PACRA’s transition studies capture the historical performance behavior of a specific rating notch. Transition behavior of the assigned rating can be obtained from PACRA’s Transition Study available at our website. (www.pacra.com) However, the actual transition of rating may not follow the pattern observed in the past. (Chapter III; 14-3(f)(vii))
  7. Proprietary Information
    1. All information contained herein is considered proprietary by PACRA. Hence, none of the information in this document can be copied or otherwise reproduced, stored, or disseminated in whole or in part in any form or by any means whatsoever by any person without PACRA’s prior written consent.

Mar-26

www.pacra.com