Rating History
Dissemination Date Long-Term Rating Short-Term Rating Outlook Action Rating Watch
05-May-26 BBB+ A2 Stable Maintain -
05-May-25 BBB+ A2 Stable Maintain -
14-Jun-24 BBB+ A2 Stable Maintain -
16-Jun-23 BBB+ A2 Stable Maintain -
17-Jun-22 BBB+ A2 Stable Maintain -
About the Entity

AEPL was incorporated as a private limited company in 2018. The Company primarily trades and distributes Diesel, Petrol, Furnace Oil, and Lubricants, while also offering fleet logistics services. The Company is owned by Mr. M. Waris (~34%), Mr. Asif (~33%), and Mr. Rana M. Arif (~33%). Mr. Arif serves as the Chairman & CEO of the Company. He is assisted by a team of experienced professionals.

Rating Rationale

Aslam Energy (Pvt.) Limited (“AEPL” or “the Company”) assigned ratings reflect strong group ecosystem in which it operates, comprising an upstream OMC (Flow Petroleum), petroleum distribution entities, and a planned refinery (TransAsia Refinery Limited), providing procurement security, stable supply access, and greater integration across the value chain. The ratings also incorporate the sponsors’ extensive experience in the oil and gas sector and, benefits from established logistics infrastructure, including approximately 30 owned tankers and 8 leased vehicles, which supports distribution efficiency while generating ancillary carriage income. The OMC sector in Pakistan operates under a regulated, price-controlled framework governed by OGRA, with inherently thin margins and high volumes, where performance is largely driven by operational efficiency, supply chain integration, and market access rather than pricing flexibility. Within this context, AEPL has positioned itself as a bulk fuel distributor with a decent presence in Punjab, supported by a network of approximately 44 retail outlets and direct supply to industrial clients on credit terms. The sector remains concentrated at the top, with a few large players dominating volumes, while mid-tier and emerging OMCs compete on logistics strength, relationships, and supply reliability. AEPL’s operational reflects a cyclical yet overall expanding revenue trajectory, with volatility largely driven by global oil price movements and demand cycles. Revenues increased from PKR 45.6 billion in FY23 to PKR 48.3 billion in FY24, before moderating to PKR 35.8 billion in FY25. In 6MFY26, the Company recorded revenues of PKR 32.2 billion, supported by a shift in sales mix and improved product dynamics. FY25 sales volumes stood at 136 million litres, while 6MFY26 volumes were reported at 119 million litres. Within this, a notable change in product composition was observed, with HSD contributing around 80 million litres in FY25 and 32 million litres in 6MFY26, while MS increased its share from approximately 54.5 million litres in FY25 to around 87 million litres in 6MFY26, reflecting a clear shift in demand towards petrol-driven consumption. Gross margins remained cyclical in the range of 1.08%–3.01% over the review period, improving to 2.27% in 6MFY26 supported by a more favorable product mix and pricing discipline. Net profit margins remained thin at 0.25%–1.69% and continue to remain low compared to peers in the OMC sector. Financial risk indicators remain modest, with sound liquidity and coverage metrics. The working capital is largely funded through supplier credit and, primarily, through related party support, while available bank-funded lines are utilized to meet short-term funding requirements.

Key Rating Drivers

Going forward, management’s strategy focuses on expanding the retail network, improving utilization of logistics and distribution assets, and enhancing vertical integration through investment in TRL, aimed at strengthening supply security and improving pricing efficiency, with timely execution and required regulatory approvals remaining key considerations. Additionally, the FY25 audit is currently in progress and has been delayed due to certain adjustments, with timely completion and issuance of audited financial statements remaining an important consideration going forward.

Profile
Legal Structure

Aslam Energy (Pvt.) Limited (‘AEPL’ or ‘the Company’) was incorporated on July 9, 2018, under the Companies Act, 2017 as a private limited company.


Background

The Company traces its origins to the early 1980s, when it commenced operations as “Aslam Oil Traders,” a sole proprietorship founded by the late Rana Muhammad Aslam. Initially focused on logistics and serving cottage industries, the business gradually expanded to cater to large-scale industrial clients across Pakistan. Over time, the younger generation assumed control, and the business was formally incorporated in 2018 as Aslam Energy (Pvt.) Limited.


Operations

The Company is primarily engaged in the distribution of petroleum (PoL) products and also provides logistics (carriage) services to various OMCs. It operates a fleet of approximately 36 vehicles (including those held through sister concerns) and manages around 44 filling stations as of June 2024. Additionally, the Company offers hospitality services to OMCs. Its product portfolio includes High-Speed Diesel (HSD), Motor Spirit (MS/Petrol), Furnace Oil, Kerosene, Lubricants, LPG, and Coal, serving a diversified industrial client base including textiles, leather, ghee, sugar, cement, power generation, and logistics sectors.


Ownership
Ownership Structure

The Company’s ownership is concentrated among three brothers: Mr. M. Waris (~34%), Mr. M. Asif (~33%), and Mr. M. Arif (~33%).


Stability

Ownership rests with three active directors who are members of the founding family, ensuring governance continuity and aligned strategic interests. The ownership structure has remained unchanged since the Company’s incorporation, reflecting strong stability.


Business Acumen

Aslam Energy is led by experienced professionals from Pakistan’s oil sector, reflecting strong industry expertise and business acumen. This leadership provides the Company with deep operational experience and sector-specific knowledge, supported by the Group’s broader commercial acumen developed over more than three decades of operations.


Financial Strength

The Company benefits from a well-established group structure comprising entities engaged across the petroleum value chain, including oil marketing, refining, distribution, and trading. Key affiliated and group companies include Flow Petroleum (Pvt.) Ltd. (OMC – sister concern), Quality 1 Petroleum (Pvt.) Ltd. (distribution), Flow DMC (distribution and marketing), TRL (TransAsia Refinery Ltd.), and Aslam Sons & Co. (trading). This integrated presence across upstream and downstream segments enhances operational synergies, supports supply chain stability, and strengthens the Group’s overall financial resilience.


Governance
Board Structure

The Board of Directors is composed entirely of the sponsoring family members, namely Mr. M. Waris, Mr. M. Arif, and Mr. M. Asif, reflecting strong sponsor involvement in strategic oversight and decision-making. While the current structure does not include independent or non-executive directors, it provides an opportunity to further strengthen governance practices through enhanced board diversity and independent oversight.


Members’ Profile

The Board of Directors comprises members with extensive experience in the oil sector, providing strong industry insight and strategic oversight. Mr. M. Waris serves as Chairman of the Board and brings over two decades years of relevant experience. The other Board members also possess significant exposure to the oil marketing industry, collectively strengthening the Company’s governance and sector expertise.


Board Effectiveness

The Board of Directors is supported by four sub-committees, namely Audit, Finance, Budgeting, and HR. These committees meet on a regular basis, contributing to structured oversight, effective governance, and timely decision-making across key functional areas.


Financial Transparency

The Company’s External Auditors, M/s PKF FRANTS, are QCR-rated and classified in Category ‘B’ on the SBP panel of auditors. The audit for FY25 is currently pending, subject to the resolution of certain matters, which remains important for ensuring transparency and timely finalization of the financial statements.


Management
Organizational Structure

The Company operates through key functional departments, including Operations & Logistics, Treasury & Finance, HR & Administration, Sales, Accounts & Taxation, Internal Audit, and Safety & Surveillance. Each function is headed by a designated manager who reports to the Chief Operating Officer (COO). The COO, in turn, reports to the Chief Executive Officer (CEO), who is responsible for overall executive oversight and decision-making and reports to the Board of Directors. The structure reflects clearly defined and demarcated responsibilities across functions, with the CEO playing a central role in operational execution and coordination across the organization.


Management Team

Mr. M. Arif, the Chief Executive Officer, brings over 12 years of experience in the retail and oil transportation sector. He has been associated with the business since its inception, contributing to its development and operational growth. He is supported by a team of skilled professionals, while the Group management team also provides additional support to the Company’s operations and offers strategic insight, further strengthening overall execution capacity and decision-making.


Effectiveness

The Company does not have any formal management committees in place. However, management meetings are held as and when required, contributing to the overall decision-making process. The Company is directly overseen by the Board of Directors, which provides strategic direction and guidance to the management.


MIS

The Company has implemented an ERP system that is integrated across all business functions, enabling seamless data flow and operational efficiency. The system is considered adequate for the size and nature of operations, and also facilitates the timely generation of management reports, thereby supporting informed decision-making and effective monitoring.


Control Environment

The Company maintains an in-house internal audit function that strengthens risk management, internal controls, and governance processes. It also contributes to the improvement of business practices through the development and enforcement of standard operating procedures (SOPs), thereby supporting operational discipline and efficiency.


Business Risk
Industry Dynamics

Pakistan’s Oil Marketing Company (OMC) sector is a key component of the country’s energy supply chain, responsible for the procurement, storage, and distribution of Petroleum, Oil and Lubricant (POL) products to industrial, commercial, transport, and retail consumers. The sector is regulated by the Oil & Gas Regulatory Authority (OGRA) and operates under a price-controlled regime for key products such as High Speed Diesel (HSD) and Motor Spirit (MS), where OMC margins are fixed by the Government. As of FY25, the market comprises approximately 44 licensed OMCs; however, it remains highly concentrated, with the top three players accounting for around 60% of total volumes, while the top ten and top twenty control approximately 95%. This structure leaves smaller and emerging players, including AEPL, to compete primarily on service quality, customer relationships, and logistics efficiency rather than pricing, given the regulated margin environment. The sector continues to reflect stable demand growth in HSD and MS, offset by a structural decline in Furnace Oil due to the power sector’s transition to alternative fuels. Overall, while the industry faces challenges from thin regulated margins, macroeconomic volatility, and energy transition risks, it also presents opportunities in the industrial B2B segment, where logistics capability and established relationships remain key competitive drivers.


Relative Position

The Company maintains a decent market share in Motor Spirit (PMG) and High Speed Diesel (HSD) within the Punjab region, reflecting a stable and established presence in the distribution and sale of petroleum products. Sales of POL products, though concentrated in a single segment, constitute the major portion of revenue. However, income from the distribution segment, along with retail income from hospitality arrangements, provides a competitive edge and contributes to a more diversified revenue stream, thereby enhancing overall business resilience and stability.


Revenues

The Company’s revenue base is primarily driven by High Speed Diesel (HSD) and Motor Spirit (MS/Petrol), which together contribute around 98.5% of total turnover, broadly aligned with national consumption patterns and AEPL’s positioning in bulk fuel distribution. FY24 reported a topline of PKR 48.31 billion, while FY25 moderated to PKR 35.77 billion, reflecting normalization in volumes and operating activity. The product mix remained stable, with HSD contributing PKR 21.15 billion and MS PKR 14.09 billion, while Furnace Oil and lubricants remained marginal. The carriage and logistics segment added approximately PKR 388 million, providing a modest diversification in revenue streams. For the six-month period ended December 31, 2025 (management accounts), the Company recorded turnover of PKR 32.18 billion, which translates into a significantly higher annualized run-rate compared to FY25, indicating strong momentum in current operations. During the period, MS contributed relatively higher compared to HSD, suggesting a mild shift in demand mix, while overall volumes remained stable.


Margins

Margins remain relatively low compared to other OMCs, primarily due to elevated operational expenses. However, the Company has shown some improvement in 6MFY25, with gradual recovery in profitability indicators. Gross margins stood at approximately 1.2% in FY24 and remained broadly stable in FY25, improving to around 2.3% in 6MFY25. Net profit margin remained modest at approximately 0.3% in FY24 (FY23: ~0.4%), improving to around 1.7% in 6MFY25, reflecting a positive but still developing margin profile.


Sustainability

Going forward, the Company plans to expand its retail outlet network across Pakistan, which is expected to support gradual organic growth by broadening its customer base and strengthening market reach. Additionally, the investment in TransAsia Refinery Limited (TRL) is expected to enhance operational efficiency by improving supply dynamics, thereby enabling more responsive pricing adjustments. However, management’s strategy with reference to TRL needs to further evolve to meaningfully improve the Company’s operational profile over time. The effective utilization of the existing distribution network and hospitality arrangements remains important in this regard, as these continue to represent key differentiators and support incremental revenue generation.


Financial Risk
Working capital

As of FY25 and 6MFY26, the Company’s net working capital cycle remained negative, improving to approximately (5) days (6MFY25: (3) days), reflecting efficient liquidity management supported by supplier credit. Trade receivable days remained stable at around 2 days, indicating strong collection discipline. Trade payable days stood at 7 days in FY25 (6MFY25: 5 days), reflecting reliance on short-term vendor credit. Overall, the working capital position is largely funded through supplier credit and related party support, while the available bank-funded lines are utilized to meet short-term funding requirements.


Coverages

As of FY25, the Company’s interest coverage ratio moderated to approximately 4.5x (FY23: ~7.2x), however it remains adequate to comfortably meet short-term debt servicing requirements. The decline is primarily driven by a reduction in EBITDA alongside higher finance costs during the period. Consequently, lower profitability levels translated into reduced earnings absorption capacity, thereby impacting the interest coverage position.


Capitalization

The Company demonstrates an adequate capital structure, as reflected in its leverage profile. The debt-to-capital ratio stood at approximately 28.6% as of FY25 (6MFY26: ~45.8%), indicating a moderate reliance on external financing. Equity increased to around PKR 3,399 million in FY25 (6MFY26: ~PKR 3,942 million), supported by retained earnings and improved profitability during the interim period.


 
 

May-26

www.pacra.com


(PKR mln)


Dec-25
6M
Jun-25
12M
Jun-24
12M
Jun-23
12M
A. BALANCE SHEET
1. Non-Current Assets 2,181 2,135 3,740 3,160
2. Investments 1,523 1,598 0 0
3. Related Party Exposure 455 701 903 961
4. Current Assets 4,599 1,737 1,389 1,204
a. Inventories 355 314 345 280
b. Trade Receivables 506 166 144 179
5. Total Assets 8,757 6,171 6,031 5,325
6. Current Liabilities 1,458 1,390 1,058 1,689
a. Trade Payables 868 873 471 1,227
7. Borrowings 458 395 281 358
8. Related Party Exposure 2,880 968 1,370 144
9. Non-Current Liabilities 19 19 15 8
10. Net Assets 3,942 3,399 3,307 3,127
11. Shareholders' Equity 3,942 3,399 3,307 3,127
B. INCOME STATEMENT
1. Sales 32,179 35,772 48,313 45,618
a. Cost of Good Sold (31,448) (35,331) (47,727) (44,756)
2. Gross Profit 731 442 586 862
a. Operating Expenses (42) (98) (79) (73)
3. Operating Profit 689 344 507 789
a. Non Operating Income or (Expense) 6 (19) (27) 49
4. Profit or (Loss) before Interest and Tax 695 325 480 838
a. Total Finance Cost (24) (84) (87) (43)
b. Taxation (127) (150) (213) (180)
6. Net Income Or (Loss) 543 91 181 615
C. CASH FLOW STATEMENT
a. Free Cash Flows from Operations (FCFO) 653 374 422 474
b. Net Cash from Operating Activities before Working Capital Changes 625 289 344 436
c. Changes in Working Capital (682) (519) 76 1,146
1. Net Cash provided by Operating Activities (58) (229) 420 1,581
2. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Investing Activities (48) 186 (640) (1,909)
3. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Financing Activities 63 113 (83) 28
4. Net Cash generated or (Used) during the period (42) 70 (303) (299)
D. RATIO ANALYSIS
1. Performance
a. Sales Growth (for the period) 79.9% -26.0% 5.9% 119.8%
b. Gross Profit Margin 2.3% 1.2% 1.2% 1.9%
c. Net Profit Margin 1.7% 0.3% 0.4% 1.3%
d. Cash Conversion Efficiency (FCFO adjusted for Working Capital/Sales) -0.1% -0.4% 1.0% 3.6%
e. Return on Equity [ Net Profit Margin * Asset Turnover * (Total Assets/Shareholders' Equity )] 29.6% 2.7% 5.6% 29.4%
2. Working Capital Management
a. Gross Working Capital (Average Days) 2 2 1 2
b. Net Working Capital (Average Days) -3 -5 -5 -7
c. Current Ratio (Current Assets / Current Liabilities) 3.2 1.2 1.3 0.7
3. Coverages
a. EBITDA / Finance Cost 32.9 6.0 10.1 25.2
b. FCFO / Finance Cost+CMLTB+Excess STB 26.0 3.0 1.9 0.6
c. Debt Payback (Total Borrowings+Excess STB) / (FCFO-Finance Cost) 2.3 3.5 4.3 2.2
4. Capital Structure
a. Total Borrowings / (Total Borrowings+Shareholders' Equity) 45.8% 28.6% 33.3% 13.8%
b. Interest or Markup Payable (Days) 7.3 22.4 34.6 20.5
c. Entity Average Borrowing Rate 2.6% 6.6% 4.7% 5.6%

May-26

www.pacra.com

May-26

www.pacra.com

  1. Rating Team Statements
    1. Rating is just an opinion about the creditworthiness of the entity and does not constitute a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell any security of the entity rated or to buy, hold, or sell the security rated, as the case may be. (Chapter III; 14-3-(x))
    2. Conflict of Interest
      1. The Rating Team or any of their family members have no interest in this rating (Chapter III; 12-2-(j))
      2. PACRA, the analysts involved in the rating process, and members of its rating committee and their family members do not have any conflict of interest relating to the rating done by them (Chapter III; 12-2-(e) & (k))
      3. The analyst is not a substantial shareholder of the customer being rated by PACRA [Annexure F; d-(ii)]
      4. Explanation: for the purpose of the above clause, the term "family members" shall include only those family members who are dependent on the analyst and members of the rating committee.
  2. Restrictions
    1. No director, officer, or employee of PACRA communicates the information acquired by him for use for rating purposes to any other person, except where required under law to do so. (Chapter III; 10-(5))
    2. PACRA does not disclose or discuss with outside parties or make improper use of the non-public information which has come to its knowledge during a business relationship with the customer. (Chapter III; 10-7-(d))
    3. PACRA does not make proposals or recommendations regarding the activities of rated entities that could impact a credit rating of the entity subject to rating. (Chapter III; 10-7-(k))
  3. Conduct of Business
    1. PACRA fulfills its obligations in a fair, efficient, transparent, and ethical manner and renders high standards of services in performing its functions and obligations. (Chapter III; 11-A-(a))
    2. PACRA uses due care in the preparation of this Rating Report. Our information has been obtained from sources we consider to be reliable, but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. PACRA does not, in every instance, independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing this Rating Report. (Clause 11-(A)(p))
    3. PACRA prohibits its employees and analysts from soliciting money, gifts, or favors from anyone with whom PACRA conducts business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(q))
    4. PACRA ensures before the commencement of the rating process that an analyst or employee has not had a recent employment or other significant business or personal relationship with the rated entity that may cause or may be perceived as causing a conflict of interest. (Chapter III; 11-A-(r))
    5. PACRA maintains the principle of integrity in seeking rating business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(u))
    6. PACRA promptly investigates in the event of misconduct or a breach of the policies, procedures, and controls, and takes appropriate steps to rectify any weaknesses to prevent any recurrence, along with suitable punitive action against the responsible employee(s). (Chapter III; 11-B-(m))
  4. Independence & Conflict of Interest
    1. PACRA receives compensation from the entity being rated or any third party for the rating services it offers. The receipt of this compensation has no influence on PACRA’s opinions or other analytical processes. In all instances, PACRA is committed to preserving the objectivity, integrity, and independence of its ratings. Our relationship is governed by two distinct mandates: i) rating mandate - signed with the entity being rated or issuer of the debt instrument, and ii) fee mandate - signed with the payer, which can be different from the entity.
    2. PACRA does not provide consultancy/advisory services or other services to any of its customers or their associated companies and associated undertakings that are being rated or have been rated by it during the preceding three years, unless it has an adequate mechanism in place ensuring that the provision of such services does not lead to a conflict of interest situation with its rating activities. (Chapter III; 12-2-(d))
    3. PACRA discloses that no shareholder directly or indirectly holding 10% or more of the share capital of PACRA also holds directly or indirectly 10% or more of the share capital of the entity which is subject to rating or the entity which issued the instrument subject to rating by PACRA. (Chapter III; 12-2-(f))
    4. PACRA ensures that the rating assigned to an entity or instrument is not affected by the existence of a business relationship between PACRA and the entity or any other party, or the non-existence of such a relationship. (Chapter III; 12-2-(i))
    5. PACRA ensures that the analysts or any of their family members shall not buy, sell, or engage in any transaction in any security which falls in the analyst’s area of primary analytical responsibility. This clause, however, does not apply to investments in securities through collective investment schemes. (Chapter III; 12-2-(l))
    6. PACRA has established policies and procedures governing investments and trading in securities by its employees and for monitoring the same to prevent insider trading, market manipulation, or any other market abuse. (Chapter III; 11-B-(g))
  5. Monitoring and Review
    1. PACRA monitors all the outstanding ratings continuously, and any potential change therein due to any event associated with the issuer, the security arrangement, the industry, etc., is disseminated to the market immediately and in an effective manner after appropriate consultation with the entity/issuer. (Chapter III; 17-(a))
    2. PACRA reviews all the outstanding ratings periodically on an annual basis. Provided that public dissemination of annual review and in an instance of change in rating will be made. (Chapter III; 17-(b))
    3. PACRA initiates an immediate review of the outstanding rating upon becoming aware of any information that may reasonably be expected to result in downgrading of the rating. (Chapter III; 17-(c))
    4. PACRA engages with the issuer and the debt securities trustee to remain updated on all information pertaining to the rating of the entity/instrument. (Chapter III; 17-(d))
  6. Probability of Default
    1. PACRA’s Rating Scale reflects the expectation of credit risk. The highest rating has the lowest relative likelihood of default (i.e., probability). PACRA’s transition studies capture the historical performance behavior of a specific rating notch. Transition behavior of the assigned rating can be obtained from PACRA’s Transition Study available at our website. (www.pacra.com) However, the actual transition of rating may not follow the pattern observed in the past. (Chapter III; 14-3(f)(vii))
  7. Proprietary Information
    1. All information contained herein is considered proprietary by PACRA. Hence, none of the information in this document can be copied or otherwise reproduced, stored, or disseminated in whole or in part in any form or by any means whatsoever by any person without PACRA’s prior written consent.

May-26

www.pacra.com