Rating History
Dissemination Date Long-Term Rating Short-Term Rating Outlook Action Rating Watch
06-Mar-26 A- A2 Stable Maintain -
08-Apr-25 A- A2 Stable Maintain YES
08-Apr-24 A- A2 Stable Maintain YES
11-Apr-23 A- A2 Stable Maintain YES
13-Apr-22 A- A2 Stable Upgrade -
About the Entity

Shazad Textile Mills Limited (“Shahzad Textile" or “the Company”) commenced operations in 1979 as a public limited company. Mr. Imran Aslam along with other family members, collectively owns the majority stake (~77.85%) in the Company. The remaining shareholding is held by corporates & related parties (~5.56%), and ~16.59% is held by numerous individuals and institutions. The Board is chaired by Mr. Mian Parvez Aslam. Mr. Imran Aslam heads the Company as the CEO. He is supported by an experienced management team.

Rating Rationale

Shahzad Textile Mills Limited (“Shahzad Textile" or "the Company") has an adequate market presence in specialty yarn, offering a range of products including ring-spun yarn and synthetic blended yarn. The Company manufactures ring-spun cotton and synthetic blended yarns, with a total installed capacity of 70,428 spindles and 187 knitting machines. Over the years, the Company has enhanced its business profile by successfully diversifying into the value-added socks segment. Shahzad Textile remains focused on building long-standing customer relations, both in the local and international markets. During FY25, the Company experienced an increase of ~3.2% in its topline, attributed to both volumetric and value-driven growth. The majority of sales continued to come from yarn, accounting for 87.1% of total revenue, while the socks division contributed 12.9%.
The Company also reported a significant turnaround at the bottom-line, posting a profit of PKR 158mln compared to a loss of PKR 98mln in FY24, underpinned by improved operational efficiency. The Company continues its upward trajectory in 1HFY26, recording a 13.4% increase in topline compared to 6MFY25. During the first half, the Company posted a profit of PKR 125mln, a significant improvement from a loss of PKR 19mln in the same period last year, demonstrating sustained growth momentum and operational resilience. Profitability indicators also improved, with gross margin rising to 8.2% (6MFY25: 5.0%) and net margin turning positive at 2% (6MFY25: -0.3%). Financial risk indicators strengthened, with finance cost coverage increasing to 4.1x (6MFY25: 0.3x) and FCFO rising sharply. The short-term leverage stood at 34.3% (6MFY25: 23.4%), accommodating for a higher working capital requirement. The Company maintains steady growth and a positive momentum heading into the remainder of the financial year.
Pakistan’s textile exports increased to USD ~17.3bln in FY25 (FY24: USD 16.7bln), reflecting a recovery led primarily by value-added segments, including garments and home textiles, while the spinning segment continued to operate under a highly competitive and margin-sensitive environment. The progressive decline in policy rates provided relief to financing costs, improving cash-flow dynamics and offering some cushion to debt-servicing metrics across the sector. In parallel, energy efficiency initiatives, particularly solarization, have emerged as a key structural differentiator, enabling relatively stronger cost positioning and margin resilience for companies with early investments in renewable energy. Overall, industry conditions reflected a gradual shift toward stabilization, with future performance increasingly dependent on product mix optimization, export orientation, energy efficiency, regulatory adaptability, and financial discipline.

Key Rating Drivers

The ratings are dependent upon the management's ability to improve the margins, profitability, and financial profile of the Company. This includes avoiding any asset-liability mismatch that may arise and effectively managing its position in a competitive segment. Any further deterioration in debt coverages and/or subdued profitability will have a negative impact on ratings.

Profile
Legal Structure

Shahzad Textile Mills Limited ('Shahzad Textile' and 'the Company') is a public listed company incorporated in 1978 under the Companies Ordinance 1984 (now called the Companies Act 2017).


Background

Late Mian M. Aslam entered the business arena by setting up spinning units and a jute mill. M. Aslam also held stakes in textile and other ventures operating under the umbrella of Sargodha Group. Later, as the ownership split, Shahzad Textile, Shaheen Cotton (which was later merged with and into the Company), and Sagodha Jute Mills were handed over to Mian Parvez Aslam and passed on to his son (third generation), Mian Imran Aslam.


Operations

The Company operates three spinning units with a current capacity of 70,428 spindles. Unit #1 focuses on PV yarn, while Unit #2 produces polyester cotton yarn. Unit #3 has been replaced with a sock manufacturing unit housing 197 knitting machines. The Company requires ~4.7MW of energy, which is met through a mix of ~8.9MW of renewable (solar) and LESCO's connection (sanctioned limit: 7.2MW). The Company's registered office is situated at Off Zafar Ali Road, Gulberg, Lahore. Three units of the manufacturing facilities are situated in Lahore-Sheikhupura Road, Sheikhupura; while one unit of manufacturing facility is situated in Sheikhupura-Faisalabad Road, Kharianwala.


Ownership
Ownership Structure

Mr. Imran Aslam along with other family members owns the majority (~77.85%) stake in the Company. ~5.56% of the shareholding in the Company is held by corporates. The remaining ~16.59% is distributed among local and foreign investors and institutions.


Stability

The fourth generation of the Aslam family has joined the business. Although there is no formal succession plan but the shareholding and operational roles are equally divided among the family members of Mr. Imran Aslam and Mr. Irfan Aslam.


Business Acumen

The sponsors hold decades of related experience and have witnessed numerous business cycles. This bodes well for the overall decision-making process for the Company.


Financial Strength

Mr. Imran Aslam holds ~28% shareholding in Sargodha Jute Mills Limited. Other than that, on a personal level, he is an active investor in real estate and the stock market. This portrays adequate financial muscles of sponsors to support the Company, if needed.


Governance
Board Structure

The overall control of the Company vests in a seven-member Board. The Board comprises two Executive Directors, three Non-Executive Directors, and two Independent Directors, including a Female Director. The Board holds independence and gender diversity that benefits the decision making process.


Members’ Profile

Mian Parvez Aslam, the Chairman, carries with him over four decades of experience and has been associated with the Board since inception. He looks after the policies and other operational issues of the Company and guides his valuable experience in times of need.


Board Effectiveness

The Board is assissted by two committees: Audit and HR & Remuneration Committee (HR&R). The Audit Committee meets quarterly to approve financial statements prior to Board meetings. HR&R meets at least once in a financial year and may meet more often if requested by the Board. Meanwhile, the Director's attendance has remained strong and meeting minutes have been formally recorded.


Financial Transparency

The External Auditors of the Company, M/S. Crowe Hussain Chaudhury & Co., Chartered Accountants, an 'A' category QCR-rated firm, has expressed an unqualified opinion on financial statements for the period ended FY25.


Management
Organizational Structure

The Company's organizational structure is divided into two main divisions: Head Office and Mills. All departmental Heads report directly to the CEO, who then reports to the BoD. However, the Head of Internal Audit and HR reports administratively to the CEO and functionally to the respective Board Committee.


Management Team

Mr. Imran Aslam heads the Company as the CEO. He is supported by a team of experienced professionals, including Mr. Imran Haider, who is the CFO of the Company. Mr. Imran Haider has been associated with the Company for almost a decade, while having an overall two decades of experience. The senior management has over a decade of relevant experience with a long association with the Company.


Effectiveness

Management's decision-making process is managed through monthly meetings of all departmental Heads. Performance reviews of all units are conducted during these discussions. However. there is no formal management committee in place.


MIS

The Company has in place oracle Oracle-based local ERP system by the name of Wizmen. The Company maintains adequate IT infrastructure and related controls.


Control Environment

The Company places emphasis on the sustainable quality of yarn. For this, it is compliant with the latest version of ISO 9001-2008 Certification. The Company has placed an in-house internal audit funtion to monitor the policy formation and implementation process. This bodes well for the Company


Business Risk
Industry Dynamics

Pakistan’s textile exports reached USD 16.7 billion in FY24, marking a modest increase of 0.93% YoY from USD 16.5 billion in FY23. The largest contribution came from the composite and garments segment at USD 9.1 billion, followed by the weaving segment at USD 6.5 billion and the spinning segment at USD 1.0 billion. During 5MFY25, textile exports stood at USD 7.6 billion, indicating steady momentum despite global market challenges. The sector continues to face profitability pressures, particularly due to the transition from the final tax regime to the normal tax regime in FY25, which introduces a 29% tax on profits along with a super tax of up to 10%, potentially affecting export-oriented units. Input costs, particularly for imported cotton, remain a concern, though the gradual decline in policy rates over the last two quarters, coupled with expectations of further reductions, is expected to ease financing costs and provide relief to the industry’s financial metrics. Sustainable growth in textile exports will depend on enhancing value-added production, improving domestic cotton availability, and maintaining competitive pricing in key international markets, while effectively managing taxation and operational costs.


Relative Position

During FY25, the Company’s yarn production capacity remained stable, with 51,312 spindles installed, the same as FY24. However, operational spindles declined to ~12,056 (FY24: ~19,900), reflecting underutilization of available capacity. When converted to 20s on three shifts per day, the plant’s total capacity remained at ~19,346,188 Kgs, while actual production declined to ~2,087,980 Kgs (FY24: ~3,236,147 Kgs). The lower production during FY25 was primarily attributable to weak demand and the temporary closure of the Company’s Spinning Unit-I. Consequently, despite maintaining full installed capacity, utilization rates fell significantly, highlighting limited operational throughput relative to potential capacity.


Revenues

During FY25, the Company’s revenue grew modestly by approximately 3.2% to PKR 11,371 million (FY24: PKR 11,015 million), reflecting stable sales performance amid prevailing industry conditions, with the majority of sales (~97%) derived from yarn. The growth was primarily supported by higher export proceeds, with export sales rising by ~30.1% to ~PKR 1,436mln compared to ~PKR 1,104mln in FY24, indicating improved penetration in international markets. During 1QFY26, the Company recorded a significant increase in revenue of ~50.6%, reaching ~PKR 3,355mln compared to ~PKR 2,227mln in 1QFY25. The substantial growth during the quarter signals strengthened demand and improved sales momentum at the start of the financial year.


Margins

During FY25, the Company demonstrated a marked improvement in its profitability profile, with the gross profit margin increasing to ~6.1% from ~4.7% in FY24, primarily driven by improved cost efficiencies and better absorption of production overheads. This translated into an enhanced operating margin of ~1.7% compared to ~0.8% in the preceding year. The trickle-down effect of improved operational performance led to a positive net margin of ~1.9% in FY25, reflecting a turnaround from the negative net margin of ~-0.9% recorded in FY24. During 1QFY26, the upward trajectory continued as the gross margin rose to ~8.4% from ~5.2% in 1QFY25, supported by improved pricing and cost management. Consequently, the Company reported a net margin of ~2.0% during 1QFY26, compared to a negative net margin of ~-1.3% in 1QFY25, indicating sustained strengthening in overall profitability.


Sustainability

The Company is focused on strengthening sustainability and competitiveness through strategic investments in technology, process optimization, and market diversification, enhancing its presence in domestic and export markets. Efforts to improve cotton sourcing, upgrade facilities, and produce certified yarns using recycled and synthetic fibers aim to ensure cost efficiency, consistent product quality, and operational efficiency. Additionally, the Company is proactively seeking financing to mitigate high interest rates and cash flow challenges, while expanding its supplier base and exploring international markets. These initiatives support long-term growth, profitability, and value creation for stakeholders.


Financial Risk
Working capital

The Company continues to meet its working capital requirements primarily through internally generated cash flows and short-term borrowings. As of FY25, the net working capital cycle slightly improved to ~27 days (FY24: ~28 days). The marginal improvement was mainly supported by a reduction in trade receivable days to ~8 days from ~9 days in FY24, reflecting relatively efficient receivables management. However, inventory days increased to ~26 days (FY24: ~24 days), indicating slightly higher inventory holding levels, while trade payable days increased to ~6 days from ~5 days in the preceding year, providing additional supplier credit support. Furthermore, the Company’s short-term trade leverage declined to ~43.4% from ~44.7% in FY24, indicating a relatively lower reliance on short-term borrowings to finance trade assets. Overall, the working capital indicators reflect stable and prudent management of operational liquidity.


Coverages

In FY25, the Company’s FCFO improved significantly to ~PKR 230mln (FY24: ~PKR 62mln), primarily attributable to enhanced operating performance and stronger profitability. Consequently, the interest coverage ratio strengthened to ~4.0x (FY24: ~1.7x), reflecting improved debt servicing capacity on the back of higher cash flow generation. The Company’s debt coverage also improved markedly to ~2.7x compared to ~-3.4x in FY24, indicating a substantial enhancement in its overall financial risk profile. As of 1QFY26, the FCFO of the Company increased to ~PKR 138mln (1QFY25: ~PKR 41mln), attributable to improved earnings generation during the period. Accordingly, the interest coverage ratio improved to ~8.5x (1QFY25: ~1.7x). However, the debt coverage ratio moderated to ~0.8x compared to ~9.9x in 1QFY25, reflecting quarterly variations in debt levels and repayment dynamics.


Capitalization

In FY25, the Company maintained a low-leveraged capital structure, with total borrowings declining slightly to ~PKR 878mln (FY24: ~PKR 893mln) while equity increased to ~PKR 3,533mln (FY24: ~PKR 3,327mln), primarily reflecting retained earnings and revaluation gains. Consequently, the debt-to-capital ratio improved to ~19.9% compared to ~21.2% in FY24, indicating a stronger equity base relative to debt. As of 1QFY26, total borrowings increased to ~PKR 1,129mln (1QFY25: ~PKR 1,011mln), while equity strengthened further to ~PKR 3,599mln (1QFY25: ~PKR 3,298mln). This resulted in a relatively stable leverage position, reflecting the Company’s prudent capital management and sustained focus on maintaining a low-leverage financial profile


 
 

Mar-26

www.pacra.com


(PKR mln)


Dec-25
6M
Jun-25
12M
Jun-24
12M
Jun-23
12M
Management Audited Audited Audited
A. BALANCE SHEET
1. Non-Current Assets 2,756 2,725 2,795 2,480
2. Investments 0 0 108 94
3. Related Party Exposure 1,057 1,055 917 859
4. Current Assets 2,959 2,547 2,050 1,712
a. Inventories 1,142 858 755 689
b. Trade Receivables 222 166 302 235
5. Total Assets 6,772 6,328 5,870 5,145
6. Current Liabilities 1,250 1,097 889 877
a. Trade Payables 264 214 157 133
7. Borrowings 1,047 878 893 868
8. Related Party Exposure 321 321 321 0
9. Non-Current Liabilities 499 499 441 390
10. Net Assets 3,655 3,533 3,327 3,011
11. Shareholders' Equity 3,655 3,533 3,327 3,011
B. INCOME STATEMENT
1. Sales 6,190 11,371 11,015 8,399
a. Cost of Good Sold (5,685) (10,676) (10,497) (8,164)
2. Gross Profit 505 695 517 234
a. Operating Expenses (307) (505) (432) (402)
3. Operating Profit 197 191 86 (168)
a. Non Operating Income or (Expense) 48 279 189 116
4. Profit or (Loss) before Interest and Tax 245 469 275 (52)
a. Total Finance Cost (51) (118) (193) (136)
b. Taxation (68) (193) (181) (81)
6. Net Income Or (Loss) 125 158 (99) (269)
C. CASH FLOW STATEMENT
a. Free Cash Flows from Operations (FCFO) 189 221 62 (168)
b. Net Cash from Operating Activities before Working Capital Changes 152 97 (117) (287)
c. Changes in Working Capital (165) 238 (100) 315
1. Net Cash provided by Operating Activities (13) 336 (217) 28
2. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Investing Activities 105 (144) 12 (42)
3. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Financing Activities 169 (15) 346 (61)
4. Net Cash generated or (Used) during the period 261 177 141 (75)
D. RATIO ANALYSIS
1. Performance
a. Sales Growth (for the period) 8.9% 3.2% 31.1% 0.0%
b. Gross Profit Margin 8.2% 6.1% 4.7% 2.8%
c. Net Profit Margin 2.0% 1.4% -0.9% -3.2%
d. Cash Conversion Efficiency (FCFO adjusted for Working Capital/Sales) 0.4% 4.0% -0.3% 1.8%
e. Return on Equity [ Net Profit Margin * Asset Turnover * (Total Assets/Shareholders' Equity )] 7.0% 4.6% -3.1% -8.9%
2. Working Capital Management
a. Gross Working Capital (Average Days) 35 33 33 40
b. Net Working Capital (Average Days) 28 27 28 34
c. Current Ratio (Current Assets / Current Liabilities) 2.4 2.3 2.3 2.0
3. Coverages
a. EBITDA / Finance Cost 5.7 4.0 1.7 0.3
b. FCFO / Finance Cost+CMLTB+Excess STB 1.3 0.8 0.2 -0.5
c. Debt Payback (Total Borrowings+Excess STB) / (FCFO-Finance Cost) 1.2 2.9 -3.4 -1.6
4. Capital Structure
a. Total Borrowings / (Total Borrowings+Shareholders' Equity) 22.3% 19.9% 21.2% 22.4%
b. Interest or Markup Payable (Days) 77.9 62.3 70.8 97.6
c. Entity Average Borrowing Rate 8.7% 10.6% 18.3% 12.5%

Mar-26

www.pacra.com

Mar-26

www.pacra.com

  1. Rating Team Statements
    1. Rating is just an opinion about the creditworthiness of the entity and does not constitute a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell any security of the entity rated or to buy, hold, or sell the security rated, as the case may be. (Chapter III; 14-3-(x))
    2. Conflict of Interest
      1. The Rating Team or any of their family members have no interest in this rating (Chapter III; 12-2-(j))
      2. PACRA, the analysts involved in the rating process, and members of its rating committee and their family members do not have any conflict of interest relating to the rating done by them (Chapter III; 12-2-(e) & (k))
      3. The analyst is not a substantial shareholder of the customer being rated by PACRA [Annexure F; d-(ii)]
      4. Explanation: for the purpose of the above clause, the term "family members" shall include only those family members who are dependent on the analyst and members of the rating committee.
  2. Restrictions
    1. No director, officer, or employee of PACRA communicates the information acquired by him for use for rating purposes to any other person, except where required under law to do so. (Chapter III; 10-(5))
    2. PACRA does not disclose or discuss with outside parties or make improper use of the non-public information which has come to its knowledge during a business relationship with the customer. (Chapter III; 10-7-(d))
    3. PACRA does not make proposals or recommendations regarding the activities of rated entities that could impact a credit rating of the entity subject to rating. (Chapter III; 10-7-(k))
  3. Conduct of Business
    1. PACRA fulfills its obligations in a fair, efficient, transparent, and ethical manner and renders high standards of services in performing its functions and obligations. (Chapter III; 11-A-(a))
    2. PACRA uses due care in the preparation of this Rating Report. Our information has been obtained from sources we consider to be reliable, but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. PACRA does not, in every instance, independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing this Rating Report. (Clause 11-(A)(p))
    3. PACRA prohibits its employees and analysts from soliciting money, gifts, or favors from anyone with whom PACRA conducts business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(q))
    4. PACRA ensures before the commencement of the rating process that an analyst or employee has not had a recent employment or other significant business or personal relationship with the rated entity that may cause or may be perceived as causing a conflict of interest. (Chapter III; 11-A-(r))
    5. PACRA maintains the principle of integrity in seeking rating business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(u))
    6. PACRA promptly investigates in the event of misconduct or a breach of the policies, procedures, and controls, and takes appropriate steps to rectify any weaknesses to prevent any recurrence, along with suitable punitive action against the responsible employee(s). (Chapter III; 11-B-(m))
  4. Independence & Conflict of Interest
    1. PACRA receives compensation from the entity being rated or any third party for the rating services it offers. The receipt of this compensation has no influence on PACRA’s opinions or other analytical processes. In all instances, PACRA is committed to preserving the objectivity, integrity, and independence of its ratings. Our relationship is governed by two distinct mandates: i) rating mandate - signed with the entity being rated or issuer of the debt instrument, and ii) fee mandate - signed with the payer, which can be different from the entity.
    2. PACRA does not provide consultancy/advisory services or other services to any of its customers or their associated companies and associated undertakings that are being rated or have been rated by it during the preceding three years, unless it has an adequate mechanism in place ensuring that the provision of such services does not lead to a conflict of interest situation with its rating activities. (Chapter III; 12-2-(d))
    3. PACRA discloses that no shareholder directly or indirectly holding 10% or more of the share capital of PACRA also holds directly or indirectly 10% or more of the share capital of the entity which is subject to rating or the entity which issued the instrument subject to rating by PACRA. (Chapter III; 12-2-(f))
    4. PACRA ensures that the rating assigned to an entity or instrument is not affected by the existence of a business relationship between PACRA and the entity or any other party, or the non-existence of such a relationship. (Chapter III; 12-2-(i))
    5. PACRA ensures that the analysts or any of their family members shall not buy, sell, or engage in any transaction in any security which falls in the analyst’s area of primary analytical responsibility. This clause, however, does not apply to investments in securities through collective investment schemes. (Chapter III; 12-2-(l))
    6. PACRA has established policies and procedures governing investments and trading in securities by its employees and for monitoring the same to prevent insider trading, market manipulation, or any other market abuse. (Chapter III; 11-B-(g))
  5. Monitoring and Review
    1. PACRA monitors all the outstanding ratings continuously, and any potential change therein due to any event associated with the issuer, the security arrangement, the industry, etc., is disseminated to the market immediately and in an effective manner after appropriate consultation with the entity/issuer. (Chapter III; 17-(a))
    2. PACRA reviews all the outstanding ratings periodically on an annual basis. Provided that public dissemination of annual review and in an instance of change in rating will be made. (Chapter III; 17-(b))
    3. PACRA initiates an immediate review of the outstanding rating upon becoming aware of any information that may reasonably be expected to result in downgrading of the rating. (Chapter III; 17-(c))
    4. PACRA engages with the issuer and the debt securities trustee to remain updated on all information pertaining to the rating of the entity/instrument. (Chapter III; 17-(d))
  6. Probability of Default
    1. PACRA’s Rating Scale reflects the expectation of credit risk. The highest rating has the lowest relative likelihood of default (i.e., probability). PACRA’s transition studies capture the historical performance behavior of a specific rating notch. Transition behavior of the assigned rating can be obtained from PACRA’s Transition Study available at our website. (www.pacra.com) However, the actual transition of rating may not follow the pattern observed in the past. (Chapter III; 14-3(f)(vii))
  7. Proprietary Information
    1. All information contained herein is considered proprietary by PACRA. Hence, none of the information in this document can be copied or otherwise reproduced, stored, or disseminated in whole or in part in any form or by any means whatsoever by any person without PACRA’s prior written consent.

Mar-26

www.pacra.com