Rating History
Dissemination Date Long-Term Rating Short-Term Rating Outlook Action Rating Watch
12-Mar-26 A- A2 Stable Upgrade -
13-Mar-25 BBB+ A2 Stable Maintain -
13-Mar-24 BBB+ A2 Stable Upgrade -
13-Mar-23 BBB A2 Stable Initial -
About the Entity

Imperium Hospitality (Pvt.) Limited (‘IHPL’ or ‘the Company’) was incorporated in 2016 as a private limited company. In 2019, the Company launched its flagship commercial real estate project, Imperium Tower. IHPL is wholly owned by the sponsoring family. M/s Kaisar Shahzada (Private) Limited holds 36% shareholding, while Mr. Danish Kaisar Monnoo, Mr. Sheraz Jehangir Monnoo, and Mr. Shahbaz Alam Monnoo each hold 21%. Mr. Sheraz Jehangir Monnoo (CEO & Director) brings over 20 years of business experience and leads the Company with the support of a qualified management team, including Mr. Muhammad Shahbaz (CFO), a Chartered Accountant overseeing financial management and controls.

Rating Rationale

Imperium Hospitality (Private) Limited ("IHPL" or "the Company") is primarily engaged in the development of premium commercial real estate. The Company’s flagship project, Imperium Tower, has successfully transitioned from development to operations following the completion of Block B. The ratings upgrade reflects IHPL’s strengthened business profile, supported by the establishment of a recurring rental-based revenue model. IHPL has developed a modern twin corporate tower that has emerged as a prominent landmark in Lahore’s skyline. The ratings derive support from the strong sponsor backing of the Monnoo Group, a diversified business group with established operations across textile, real estate, power, and agriculture, providing financial strength and strategic depth to the Company. Pakistan’s real estate sector is demonstrating gradual stabilization amid improving macroeconomic conditions. Easing inflationary pressures and a relatively softer interest rate environment have supported recovery prospects, particularly in the commercial rental segment, while the broader sector outlook remains stable despite structural challenges. Imperium Tower spans approximately 341,351 square feet and comprises two sections: Block A and Block B, each consisting of four basements, a ground floor, and eighteen upper floors. Block A was handed over to Fauji Fertilizer Company Limited (FFC) in FY24, generating ~PKR 3.7bln and materially strengthening the Company’s equity base. Following the completion of Block B, IHPL has successfully operationalized the tower and secured reputable corporate tenants under long-term lease arrangements. The tower is currently ~97% occupied, reflecting strong demand fundamentals and providing enhanced revenue visibility through contracted rental inflows. The completion and stabilization of the asset have significantly reduced execution risk and strengthened the Company’s overall operating profile. Sponsor commitment remains evident through continued financial support. As of Dec’25, total borrowings declined to approximately PKR 398mln (Jun’25: PKR 416mln). Leverage stood at ~39.9% as of Dec’25, with absolute debt levels trending downward and supported by a strong equity base of ~PKR 2.1bln. Although coverage metrics remained modest during the transition phase, the initiation of recurring rental inflows marks a positive structural shift in the Company’s financial risk profile.

Key Rating Drivers

Going forward, the ratings are contingent upon achieving higher occupancy levels in Block B, further strengthening rental cash flows, and maintaining a prudent capital structure, along with improving coverage indicators.

Profile
Legal Structure

Imperium Hospitality (Private) Limited (“IHPL” or “the Company”) is a private limited entity incorporated in Pakistan on July 12, 2016, under the Companies Ordinance, 1984 (now the Companies Act, 2017). It operates as a subsidiary of the Monnoo Group, with a vision to pioneer a state-of-the-art corporate infrastructure and redefine commercial real estate and business spaces. The Company’s registered office is located in Lahore, Pakistan.


Background

Following Partition, the Monnoo family relocated to East Pakistan and later expanded into the textile industry, establishing five spinning mills—three in West Pakistan and two in East Pakistan. Over the decades, the Monnoo Group has emerged as a leading industrial conglomerate, contributing significantly to Pakistan’s economic growth. The Group’s diversified portfolio includes twelve textile units, agricultural farms, and research units specializing in agricultural products. Monnoo Group has gained global recognition for its expertise in textile and agriculture sectors. In textiles, its product range includes yarns, ecru yarn, fancy/novelty yarns, mélange yarns, and sewing threads, whereas its agricultural operations focus on tissue culture, orchards, and farm development.


Operations

Imperium Hospitality (Private) Limited is primarily engaged in business as builders and developers, focusing on the development, management, and operation of real estate ventures. Currently, the Company is focused on the development and construction of Imperium Tower in Gulberg, Lahore. This architecturally modern twin-tower project consists of four basement levels, a ground floor, and eighteen additional stories. Designed to set new benchmarks in commercial real estate, Imperium Tower aims to combine luxury, functionality, and modern aesthetics.


Ownership
Ownership Structure

Imperium Hospitality (Private) Limited is wholly owned by the sponsoring family, with M/s Kaisar Shahzada (Private) Limited holding a majority stake of 36%. The remaining ownership is equally distributed among Mr. Danish Kaisar Monnoo, Mr. Sheraz Jehangir Monnoo, and Mr. Shahbaz Alam Monnoo, each holding 21% of the shares.


Stability

The Company's ownership structure appears stable, with no anticipated changes in shareholding in the near future. The Monnoo Group, through its investment arm, Kaisar Shahzada (Private) Limited, retains a significant stake, ensuring continuity and strategic direction. However, further strengthening of the structure through a well-defined and streamlined shareholding arrangement among family members, along with a formalized succession plan, would enhance long-term stability. Proper documentation of the succession framework would also provide greater clarity for practical implementation and future leadership transitions.


Business Acumen

The Monnoo family, the principal sponsors of the Group, is widely recognized for its strong business acumen. Having operated in Pakistan for several decades, the Group has successfully expanded into multiple industries, including textiles, real estate, and agriculture. Its extensive industry expertise, strategic vision, and ability to adapt to evolving market dynamics have reinforced its position as a prominent business conglomerate.


Financial Strength

The Monnoo Group’s diversified investment portfolio, spanning textile, power, real estate, and agriculture, reflects its strong financial standing. With multiple entities under its umbrella, the Group is well-positioned to provide financial support to Imperium Hospitality (Private) Limited, should the need arise. Its diversified asset base and stable revenue streams further reinforce the sponsors’ ability to back the Company’s long-term growth and sustainability.


Governance
Board Structure

The Board of Imperium Hospitality (Private) Limited consists of three members, including Chief Executive Officer & Director, Mr. Sheraz Jehangir Monnoo, and two non-executive directors, Mr. Danish Kaisar Monnoo and Mr. Shahbaz Alam Monnoo. The Company does not have any independent directors, and the board is primarily family-dominated. All members have been associated with the board for over two decades, ensuring continuity and strategic alignment with the Group’s long-term vision.


Members’ Profile

The board members are seasoned professionals with extensive industry experience. Mr. Sheraz Jehangir Monnoo, the CEO & Director of the Company, has over twenty years of expertise in the sector. As the driving force behind the development of Imperium Tower, he leads with a visionary approach and also holds director positions in other Monnoo Group companies. His leadership, coupled with the business acumen of the other board members, reinforces the Company’s strategic direction and operational efficiency.


Board Effectiveness

The Company does not have any formal board committees, and all board members concurrently hold director positions in other Group entities. This structure, while ensuring experienced leadership, limits the scope for impartial oversight and enhanced corporate governance. Establishing dedicated board committees, including audit and risk management committees, could improve governance mechanisms and decision-making processes.


Financial Transparency

The Company’s financial statements are audited by M/S Mushtaq & Co., Chartered Accountants, a State Bank of Pakistan (SBP) Category ‘B’ audit firm. For the year ended June 30, 2025, the auditors issued an unqualified audit opinion, affirming that the financial statements present a true and fair view of the Company’s financial position in accordance with applicable reporting standards.


Management
Organizational Structure

Imperium Hospitality (Private) Limited follows a simplified organizational structure, designed to streamline operations and enhance managerial efficiency. The functions reporting to the CEO are categorized into five key areas: Operations, Finance, Sales, Consultants, and In-House Engineers. Each of these functions is further divided into specialized sub-units, ensuring a structured approach to managing the Company’s diverse activities. The entire operational framework falls under the direct oversight of the CEO, facilitating a centralized decision-making process.


Management Team

The Company’s leadership is spearheaded by Mr. Sheraz Jehangir Monnoo, who has been associated with the Monnoo Group since its inception. Holding a bachelor’s degree from the University of Boston, USA, he brings a strategic vision and deep industry expertise to the organization. Supporting him is a team of qualified professionals, each bringing relevant industry experience. A key member of this team is Mr. Muhammad Shahbaz, the Chief Financial Officer (CFO), who is a Chartered Accountant and has been associated with Monnoo Group for several years. His financial expertise plays a crucial role in ensuring the Company’s fiscal discipline and long-term financial sustainability.


Effectiveness

Backed by an experienced management team, IHPL continues to strengthen its position and expand its footprint in Pakistan’s real estate industry. The well-defined functional roles within the Company ensure that operational objectives are effectively aligned with its strategic vision. By leveraging its expertise, the management team is driving growth, operational efficiency, and business expansion.


MIS

The Company has deployed an Oracle-based ERP solution, which integrates multiple operational modules to track daily and monthly reports. This technology-driven system enables real-time monitoring and data-driven decision-making, ensuring that management maintains a high level of operational oversight and efficiency.


Control Environment

To maintain operational efficiency and strong internal controls, the Company has implemented a robust oversight mechanism. It has an in-house team of engineers, supplemented by an outsourced design development team, project managers, construction consultants, and contractors. This integrated framework allows the Company to identify, assess, and manage risks associated with the construction and development of high-rise buildings. Through this proactive risk management approach, IHPL ensures that all projects are executed with precision, compliance, and quality assurance.


Business Risk
Industry Dynamics

Pakistan’s real estate sector operates in a moderately improving macroeconomic environment, though structural challenges persist. The sector contributed approximately 3.7% to national GDP in FY24, with an estimated market size of PKR ~3.7 trillion, registering ~10.1% YoY growth. However, growth momentum moderated to ~5.9% YoY in 1HFY25, reflecting elevated construction costs, taxation measures, and subdued consumer financing activity. Inflationary pressures have eased materially, with headline inflation declining sharply during FY25, enabling the State Bank of Pakistan to initiate a monetary easing cycle, reducing the policy rate to ~11–12% by May’25. This is expected to gradually support real estate activity, particularly in the commercial and rental segments, where demand fundamentals remain relatively resilient. Despite easing monetary conditions, high transaction taxes, elevated construction input costs (cement and steel), and reduced availability of consumer housing finance continue to constrain sector-wide activity. Consumer financing for house building declined by ~4% YoY during 2QFY25, though expectations of further rate cuts and potential tax rationalization in upcoming budgets may support a gradual recovery. Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) into the sector increased significantly in FY24, rising to USD ~70 million, indicating renewed investor interest. However, sector growth remains uneven, with rental and commercial real estate demonstrating greater stability relative to speculative residential developments. Overall, the sector outlook is assessed as stable, supported by improving macro indicators, though recovery is expected to remain gradual.


Relative Position

As a relatively new entrant, Imperium Hospitality (Private) Limited is in the process of establishing its market presence within Pakistan’s commercial real estate segment. The Company’s flagship development, Imperium Tower, anchors its positioning strategy, with a focus on corporate-oriented, rental-based real estate rather than speculative sales. The successful sale of Block A to Fauji Fertilizer Company Limited represents a key milestone, validating asset quality and strengthening credibility among institutional counterparties. With the completion of Tower B and commencement of rental operations, IHPL’s business model has transitioned toward recurring income generation, aligning it more closely with stable rental real estate dynamics observed across the sector.   In the competitive landscape, established commercial developments such as Tricon Tower and Askari Tower continue to demonstrate high occupancy levels, indicating sustained demand for well-located, quality office space. While IHPL remains smaller in scale relative to these peers, the absence of vacant space in competing towers supports favorable demand dynamics for newly operational, comparable assets.


Revenues

During FY25, Imperium Hospitality (Private) Limited did not record any material project-based sales. However, the Company achieved a key operational milestone with the completion of Tower B, enabling a strategic shift from a development-led revenue model toward recurring rental income generation. While revenue contribution during the year remained limited due to initial leasing and occupancy ramp-up, the completion of the tower significantly improved future revenue visibility. In comparison, FY24 revenue amounted to approximately PKR 3.7 billion, largely stemming from the one-off handover of Block A, which involved the transfer of ownership rights and interests to FFC. Revenue during FY24 was therefore transaction-driven and non-recurring in nature, with no contribution from operating rental assets. During 6MFY26 (Dec’25), the Company recorded rental income of PKR 18 million, reflecting the commencement of rental operations from the completed tower. Several lease agreements were finalized during the period, while additional tenants remain at advanced stages of negotiation, indicating improving revenue traction.


Margins

In FY25, profitability margins remained subdued as the Company transitioned into the operational phase. Operating expenses related to asset readiness, maintenance, and administrative overheads were incurred, while rental income contribution remained modest due to partial occupancy levels, resulting in comparatively weak margins. In contrast, FY24 margins were supported by the one-off revenue recognition from Block A, translating into relatively strong operating and net margins. However, these margins were not representative of sustainable operating performance, given the absence of recurring income streams. During 6MFY26 (Dec’25), margins reflect the early stabilization phase of rental operations, with fixed operating costs impacting profitability. As occupancy levels improve and leasing stabilizes, margins are expected to strengthen on a sustainable basis.


Sustainability

As of FY25, the Company’s sustainability profile improved materially following the successful completion of Tower B, significantly reducing execution and construction-related risks. While cash flow contribution during the year remained limited, the completion of the asset laid the foundation for stable, long-term rental income. In comparison, FY24 sustainability was relatively weaker, as the business model remained reliant on project execution and asset disposal, with Tower B still under construction and no recurring income stream in place. During 6MFY26 (Dec’25), the commencement of rental inflows enhanced business sustainability, marking a transition toward predictable and recurring cash flows, thereby strengthening the Company’s long-term operating resilience.


Financial Risk
Working capital

During FY25, the Company managed its working capital requirements through a mix of internally generated funds, interest-free sponsor support, and long-term borrowings. Total borrowings stood at approximately PKR 416 million, reflecting a decline from prior levels and indicating prudent liquidity management. In comparison, FY24 total borrowings amounted to PKR 497 million, with funding requirements largely linked to project completion activities. Working capital during the year remained manageable but was more dependent on sponsor support and project-related cash flows. As of 6MFY26 (Dec’25), borrowings further declined to PKR 398 million. The initiation of rental inflows is expected to support working capital requirements on a more sustainable basis going forward.


Coverages

In FY25, coverage indicators weakened due to the absence of large-scale revenue recognition and limited rental income contribution during the transition phase. Nonetheless, finance costs remained largely stable, partially mitigating pressure on coverage metrics. In contrast, FY24 recorded FCFO of approximately PKR 508 million, driven by project-related cash inflows, resulting in strong coverage indicators for the year. During 6MFY26 (Dec’25), coverage metrics remain constrained, reflecting the early stage of rental operations. However, improving occupancy levels and stable finance costs are expected to support gradual improvement in coverage ratios.


Capitalization

As of FY25, the Company maintained a leveraged capital structure, with leverage recorded at approximately 39.6%, reflecting earnings moderation during the transition toward rental operations. In comparison, FY24 leverage stood lower at 30.3%, supported by strong equity levels following the Block A transaction and reduced debt exposure. As of 6MFY26 (Dec’25), leverage remained largely stable at 39.9%, with absolute debt levels continuing to decline. The capitalization profile remains supported by a strong equity base and improving business stability.


 
 

Mar-26

www.pacra.com


(PKR mln)


Dec-25
6M
Jun-25
12M
Jun-24
12M
Jun-23
12M
A. BALANCE SHEET
1. Non-Current Assets 29 24 14 14
2. Investments 3,660 3,523 3,093 2,099
3. Related Party Exposure 0 0 0 0
4. Current Assets 385 200 252 2,545
a. Inventories 0 0 0 2,078
b. Trade Receivables 33 0 0 0
5. Total Assets 4,074 3,747 3,358 4,658
6. Current Liabilities 364 180 219 2,684
a. Trade Payables 145 154 134 39
7. Borrowings 398 416 497 633
8. Related Party Exposure 1,047 1,011 475 1,046
9. Non-Current Liabilities 135 9 8 5
10. Net Assets 2,129 2,131 2,159 290
11. Shareholders' Equity 2,129 2,131 2,159 290
B. INCOME STATEMENT
1. Sales 18 0 3,715 0
a. Cost of Good Sold 0 0 (3,016) 0
2. Gross Profit 18 0 699 0
a. Operating Expenses (23) (41) (55) (48)
3. Operating Profit (5) (41) 644 (48)
a. Non Operating Income or (Expense) 4 2 15 6
4. Profit or (Loss) before Interest and Tax (2) (39) 659 (41)
a. Total Finance Cost (0) (1) (1) (2)
b. Taxation 0 12 (2) (21)
6. Net Income Or (Loss) (2) (28) 655 (64)
C. CASH FLOW STATEMENT
a. Free Cash Flows from Operations (FCFO) (2) (41) 508 (59)
b. Net Cash from Operating Activities before Working Capital Changes (2) (55) 486 (68)
c. Changes in Working Capital 0 17 (232) (322)
1. Net Cash provided by Operating Activities (2) (38) 254 (390)
2. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Investing Activities 0 (414) (979) (483)
3. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Financing Activities 0 455 (707) 975
4. Net Cash generated or (Used) during the period (2) 2 (1,432) 103
D. RATIO ANALYSIS
1. Performance
a. Sales Growth (for the period) #DIV/0! N/A #DIV/0! N/A
b. Gross Profit Margin 100.0% N/A 18.8% N/A
c. Net Profit Margin -11.1% N/A 17.6% N/A
d. Cash Conversion Efficiency (FCFO adjusted for Working Capital/Sales) -11.1% N/A 7.4% N/A
e. Return on Equity [ Net Profit Margin * Asset Turnover * (Total Assets/Shareholders' Equity )] -0.2% N/A 53.5% N/A
2. Working Capital Management
a. Gross Working Capital (Average Days) 339 N/A 204 N/A
b. Net Working Capital (Average Days) -1193 N/A 196 N/A
c. Current Ratio (Current Assets / Current Liabilities) 1.1 1.1 1.1 0.9
3. Coverages
a. EBITDA / Finance Cost -18.1 -64.5 730.8 -58.3
b. FCFO / Finance Cost+CMLTB+Excess STB -0.0 -0.7 5.1 -0.2
c. Debt Payback (Total Borrowings+Excess STB) / (FCFO-Finance Cost) -338.9 -33.8 1.9 -29.9
4. Capital Structure
a. Total Borrowings / (Total Borrowings+Shareholders' Equity) 39.9% 39.6% 30.3% 85.0%
b. Interest or Markup Payable (Days) 12083.1 10967.1 5552.1 11949.9
c. Entity Average Borrowing Rate 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0%

Mar-26

www.pacra.com

Mar-26

www.pacra.com

  1. Rating Team Statements
    1. Rating is just an opinion about the creditworthiness of the entity and does not constitute a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell any security of the entity rated or to buy, hold, or sell the security rated, as the case may be. (Chapter III; 14-3-(x))
    2. Conflict of Interest
      1. The Rating Team or any of their family members have no interest in this rating (Chapter III; 12-2-(j))
      2. PACRA, the analysts involved in the rating process, and members of its rating committee and their family members do not have any conflict of interest relating to the rating done by them (Chapter III; 12-2-(e) & (k))
      3. The analyst is not a substantial shareholder of the customer being rated by PACRA [Annexure F; d-(ii)]
      4. Explanation: for the purpose of the above clause, the term "family members" shall include only those family members who are dependent on the analyst and members of the rating committee.
  2. Restrictions
    1. No director, officer, or employee of PACRA communicates the information acquired by him for use for rating purposes to any other person, except where required under law to do so. (Chapter III; 10-(5))
    2. PACRA does not disclose or discuss with outside parties or make improper use of the non-public information which has come to its knowledge during a business relationship with the customer. (Chapter III; 10-7-(d))
    3. PACRA does not make proposals or recommendations regarding the activities of rated entities that could impact a credit rating of the entity subject to rating. (Chapter III; 10-7-(k))
  3. Conduct of Business
    1. PACRA fulfills its obligations in a fair, efficient, transparent, and ethical manner and renders high standards of services in performing its functions and obligations. (Chapter III; 11-A-(a))
    2. PACRA uses due care in the preparation of this Rating Report. Our information has been obtained from sources we consider to be reliable, but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. PACRA does not, in every instance, independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing this Rating Report. (Clause 11-(A)(p))
    3. PACRA prohibits its employees and analysts from soliciting money, gifts, or favors from anyone with whom PACRA conducts business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(q))
    4. PACRA ensures before the commencement of the rating process that an analyst or employee has not had a recent employment or other significant business or personal relationship with the rated entity that may cause or may be perceived as causing a conflict of interest. (Chapter III; 11-A-(r))
    5. PACRA maintains the principle of integrity in seeking rating business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(u))
    6. PACRA promptly investigates in the event of misconduct or a breach of the policies, procedures, and controls, and takes appropriate steps to rectify any weaknesses to prevent any recurrence, along with suitable punitive action against the responsible employee(s). (Chapter III; 11-B-(m))
  4. Independence & Conflict of Interest
    1. PACRA receives compensation from the entity being rated or any third party for the rating services it offers. The receipt of this compensation has no influence on PACRA’s opinions or other analytical processes. In all instances, PACRA is committed to preserving the objectivity, integrity, and independence of its ratings. Our relationship is governed by two distinct mandates: i) rating mandate - signed with the entity being rated or issuer of the debt instrument, and ii) fee mandate - signed with the payer, which can be different from the entity.
    2. PACRA does not provide consultancy/advisory services or other services to any of its customers or their associated companies and associated undertakings that are being rated or have been rated by it during the preceding three years, unless it has an adequate mechanism in place ensuring that the provision of such services does not lead to a conflict of interest situation with its rating activities. (Chapter III; 12-2-(d))
    3. PACRA discloses that no shareholder directly or indirectly holding 10% or more of the share capital of PACRA also holds directly or indirectly 10% or more of the share capital of the entity which is subject to rating or the entity which issued the instrument subject to rating by PACRA. (Chapter III; 12-2-(f))
    4. PACRA ensures that the rating assigned to an entity or instrument is not affected by the existence of a business relationship between PACRA and the entity or any other party, or the non-existence of such a relationship. (Chapter III; 12-2-(i))
    5. PACRA ensures that the analysts or any of their family members shall not buy, sell, or engage in any transaction in any security which falls in the analyst’s area of primary analytical responsibility. This clause, however, does not apply to investments in securities through collective investment schemes. (Chapter III; 12-2-(l))
    6. PACRA has established policies and procedures governing investments and trading in securities by its employees and for monitoring the same to prevent insider trading, market manipulation, or any other market abuse. (Chapter III; 11-B-(g))
  5. Monitoring and Review
    1. PACRA monitors all the outstanding ratings continuously, and any potential change therein due to any event associated with the issuer, the security arrangement, the industry, etc., is disseminated to the market immediately and in an effective manner after appropriate consultation with the entity/issuer. (Chapter III; 17-(a))
    2. PACRA reviews all the outstanding ratings periodically on an annual basis. Provided that public dissemination of annual review and in an instance of change in rating will be made. (Chapter III; 17-(b))
    3. PACRA initiates an immediate review of the outstanding rating upon becoming aware of any information that may reasonably be expected to result in downgrading of the rating. (Chapter III; 17-(c))
    4. PACRA engages with the issuer and the debt securities trustee to remain updated on all information pertaining to the rating of the entity/instrument. (Chapter III; 17-(d))
  6. Probability of Default
    1. PACRA’s Rating Scale reflects the expectation of credit risk. The highest rating has the lowest relative likelihood of default (i.e., probability). PACRA’s transition studies capture the historical performance behavior of a specific rating notch. Transition behavior of the assigned rating can be obtained from PACRA’s Transition Study available at our website. (www.pacra.com) However, the actual transition of rating may not follow the pattern observed in the past. (Chapter III; 14-3(f)(vii))
  7. Proprietary Information
    1. All information contained herein is considered proprietary by PACRA. Hence, none of the information in this document can be copied or otherwise reproduced, stored, or disseminated in whole or in part in any form or by any means whatsoever by any person without PACRA’s prior written consent.

Mar-26

www.pacra.com