Rating History
Dissemination Date Long-Term Rating Short-Term Rating Outlook Action Rating Watch
11-Mar-26 BBB+ A2 Positive Maintain -
04-Apr-25 BBB+ A2 Stable Maintain -
05-Apr-24 BBB+ A2 Stable Maintain -
05-Apr-23 BBB+ A2 Stable Maintain -
05-Apr-22 BBB+ A2 Stable Maintain -
About the Entity

Jauharabad Sugar Mills Limited “the Company” (formerly known as Kohinoor Sugar Mills Limited), incorporated in 1968, is listed on Pakistan Stock Exchange since 1973. The Company was acquired from Saigol Group in Oct-13 by Cane Processing (Pvt.) Limited. Lately, the Company has increased its operational crushing unit, to 9,500 TCD. The Company is engaged in the manufacturing and sale of refined sugar and its by-products; molasses and bagasse. Jauharabad is majorly owned by a Holding Company - Cane Processing (Pvt.) Limited (~64%) -and individuals of Latif family (~9%). While the Company has a free float of ~34%. The Company's Board is Chaired by Mr. M. Aamir Beg. The production plant is located at Industrial Area Jauharabad City District Khushab in the province of Punjab.

Rating Rationale

The assigned ratings reflect Jauharabad Sugar Mills Limited’s (JSML) established position in Pakistan’s sugar sector and the notable improvement in its financial risk profile during MY25. The "Positive" outlook revision underscores the company’s strengthened margins, enhanced profitability, and a robust improvement in key debt coverage indicators. This upward trajectory is driven by management’s unwavering focus on operational efficiency and cost optimization, further bolstered by the deep business acumen and strategic oversight provided by the company’s sponsors. By aligning disciplined financial management with long-term growth objectives, the organization continues to solidify its market position and credit profile. While the sugar industry remains exposed to cyclical production patterns and raw material price volatility, JSML has demonstrated resilience. Despite a sector-wide contraction in sugar production from 6.5MT to 5.8MT (-10.7%), JSML limited its production decline to a marginal 2.8%, effectively neutralizing broader market volatility and demonstrating a strengthened risk absorption capacity.
The Company operates a sugarcane crushing capacity of 9,500 TCD, with its primary unit producing 63,028 MT of sugar in MY25. Notably, sugar recovery improved to 10.10% (MY24: 9.86%), reflecting enhanced milling efficiency. From a financial perspective, JSML achieved a milestone in revenue growth, with the topline increasing to PKR 10,727mln (MY24: PKR 7,996mln), driven by higher domestic prices and a strategic expansion into export markets. Profitability indicators showed an upward movement; gross profit margins reached 13.8% (MY24: 12.6%) and operating margins rose to 10.8% (MY24: 9.3%). Net income surged to PKR 250mln (MY24: PKR 2mln), primarily due to a 31.5% reduction in finance costs. The Company’s liquidity profile also strengthened, as evidenced by a narrowed working capital cycle of 79 days (MY24: 88 days) and an increase in FCFO to PKR 1,349mln (MY24: PKR 1,054mln). With a debt-to-equity ratio improving to ~31.5% (MY24: ~33.9%), and a growing equity base of PKR 9,323mln, the Company is well-positioned for sustained financial stability.

Key Rating Drivers

Going forward, the Company’s performance is expected to remain stable, supported by consistent domestic demand for sugar, and improved profitability. The ratings are dependent upon the management’s ability to sustain margins, improve performance while maintaining the debt profile.

Profile
Legal Structure

Jauharabad Sugar Mills Limited ('Jauharabad Sugar' or 'the Company') was incorporated as a public limited company and is listed on the Pakistan Stock Exchange since 1973.


Background

The Company was established on build, operate and transfer (BOT) contract by Pakistan Industrial Development Corporation (PIDC) in collaboration with Thal Development Authority (TDA). In 1955, Saigol Group acquired the contract and named the Company, Kohinoor Sugar Mills Limited. In Oct 2013, Cane Processing (Pvt.) Ltd. acquired major stakes (~64%) of Kohinoor Sugar Mills and renamed it to Jauharabad Sugar.


Operations

Jauharabad Sugar is engaged in the manufacturing and sale of sugar along with its by-products, including molasses, bagasse, and mud. The Company operates two sugarcane crushing units, Line-I and Line-II, with a combined crushing capacity of 12,500 MT per day. Line-I, with a capacity of 3,000 MT per day, is currently non-operational. Line-II has an enhanced crushing capacity of 9,500 MT per day, increased from 7,500 MT per day. During MY25, the Company produced 63,028 MT of sugar, reflecting a slight decline of approximately 2.85% compared to 64,874 MT produced in MY24. Despite the marginal decrease in production, sugar recovery improved to 10.10% from 9.86%, registering an increase of 2.47%. The improvement in recovery rate indicates enhanced milling efficiency, better cane quality during certain crushing phases, and strengthened operational controls at the plant level. Molasses production declined by 12.07% to 23,258 MT, in line with the lower crushing volume. Furthermore, molasses recovery decreased to 3.73% from 4.02%, reflecting a decline of 7.24%, primarily due to variations in cane quality and sucrose content during the season. The Company operated for 110 crushing days during MY25, reflecting an adequate operational cycle. However, despite the extended working period, total sugarcane crushed decreased by 5.21% to 623,733 MT compared to 657,997 MT in the previous year. Overall, the sugar recovery rate remained stable at approximately 10.10% (MY24: 9.86%), with the improvement largely attributable to favorable moisture levels in the sugarcane crop, which supported improved extraction efficiency and higher yield from the raw material.


Ownership
Ownership Structure

The Company’s majority ownership rests with Cane Processing, a holding company that holds 64% of the shares, while 9% is owned by individuals from the Latif family. Institutional investors, including NIT and ICP, collectively hold 3% of the shares. The remaining 35% constitutes the Company’s free float, allowing for public trading and investor participation. Cane Processing, the principal shareholder, is predominantly controlled by Mrs. Ghazala Amjad, who owns a 99% stake, giving her significant influence over the Company’s strategic direction and decision-making.


Stability

The presence of a holding Company enhances stability by providing long-term strategic direction and financial security. Transferring the entire family stake to the holding company would further consolidate ownership, streamline decision-making, and reinforce the company's structural integrity, ensuring sustained growth and operational efficiency.


Business Acumen

The sponsoring family has a long-standing history in the business world. Mother of Mr. Ahsan Latif (JSML’s Chief Operating Officer), Mrs. Ghazala Amjad hails from the sponsoring family of Kohat Cement. Mr. Ahmad Latif, younger brother of Mr. Ahsan Latif, owns two LPG businesses – named Synergy and Awami.


Financial Strength

The company is primarily owned by Cane Processing, which serves as a strong financial backbone. The sponsors possess sufficient financial strength to support the Company in times of distress, ensuring stability, continuity, and resilience against market fluctuations.


Governance
Board Structure

The Company's Board comprises two Executive Directors, three Independent Directors, and two Non-Executive Directors nominated by Cane Processing. The Board is chaired by an Independent Director, ensuring balanced governance and oversight. Its composition, which emphasizes independence and diverse expertise, strengthens decision-making and enhances strategic direction.


Members’ Profile

The Board's Chairman, Mr. M. Aamir Beg is associated with the Company for 7 years and has a thirty seven years of practical experience in the fields of Marketing and new projects development. He is a qualified M.B.A from Liverpool University, England in 1981. Mr. Ghias-ul-Hasan, Non-executive Director/ CPL Nominee, is an entrepreneur with forty four years’ experience, has led number of businesses in Pakistan including Manufacturing, Trading and Advertising. His work experience and Managerial ability is one of the key success factors for the Company. The Board's experience and skillset is the key success factors for the Company.


Board Effectiveness

During MY25, the Board met four times, with majority attendance, maintaining well documented minutes. The Board has four sub committees: Audit Committee (met 4 times during MY25), Nomination Committee (met 1 time during MY25), Risk Management Committee (met once during MY25) and HR & Remuneration Committee (met once during MY25).


Financial Transparency

External auditors, UHY Hassan Naeem & Company, Chartered Accountants, have expressed an unqualified opinion on the financial statements of MY25. The firm has been QCR rated and is in Category 'A' of SBP panel.


Management
Organizational Structure

The Company operates through eight key divisions: Mill, Operations, Power, Cane, Marketing, Human Resources, Internal Audit, and Finance. All functional heads report directly to the Chief Operating Officer (COO), who, in turn, reports to the Chief Executive Officer (CEO). However, to ensure independent oversight, the Head of Internal Audit reports functionally to the Board Audit Committee while maintaining an administrative reporting line to the CEO. This structure promotes operational efficiency, accountability, and robust internal controls.


Management Team

Mr. Syed Anwar Hussain Shahid, the CEO, a renowned Sugar Technologist having a vast experience of forty one years in the erection and commissioning sugar plants, Technical Supervision indecision about plant expansion, equipment selection and project exposure. He is associated with the Company since 2021. He is responsible for overseeing technical matters of JSML sugar operations. Mr. Ahsan Latif, the COO, has work experience of 24 years and is associated with the Company since 2013. The management team has substantial experience in the relevant domain.


Effectiveness

The Company’s management ensures operational effectiveness through a Management Committee, which includes the heads of all divisions. Daily coordination meetings are conducted to facilitate communication, align strategies, and address key operational matters. The minutes of these meetings are systematically documented and circulated to ensure accountability, track progress, and follow up on action items, fostering a structured and efficient decision-making process.


MIS

The Company uses ERP system which is updated on real time basis and generates 15 reports to assist the top management in monitoring and evaluating the performance.


Control Environment

The Internal Audit function is co-sourced with KPMG, ensuring a robust and independent review process. This function plays a vital role in providing support, guidance, and oversight for the internally established Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs). Additionally, KPMG conducts gap analyses of existing systems and policies, identifying areas for improvement and ensuring compliance with best practices, thereby strengthening the company’s internal controls and risk management framework.


Business Risk
Industry Dynamics

The sugar industry in Pakistan operates within a competitive market structure, contributing approximately 0.8% to the nominal GDP and 3.5% to the value added in the agriculture sector as of MY24. Regional dynamics show that production is heavily concentrated in Punjab, which accounted for 68.5% of the province-wide distribution in MY25, followed by Sindh at 24.8% and KPK at 6.7%. The cultivated area for sugarcane remained steady at 1.2 million hectares in MY25 and MY24. Despite the adverse impact of floods, sugar production increased to 6.66 million tonnes in MY25 from 5.8 million tonnes in MY24. The market is dominated by major players, with the JDW Group (combined) holding the largest production share at 11.9% in MY24, followed by Hamza at 6.9% and Tandlianwala (combined) at 5.5%. Local sugar prices have historically been lower than global averages, though they are projected to rise to 450 USD/MT in 3MMY26. Total consumption is steadily growing, reaching an estimated 6.6 million MT in MY25, with per capita consumption at 27.4 kg.


Relative Position

The Company contributed approximately ~0.955% to the total production of sugar produced in Pakistan.


Revenues

In MY25, the company’s total revenue experienced a notable improvement, rising to PKR 10,727 million from PKR 7,996 million in MY24. This growth was driven by a strong performance in both domestic and international markets; local sales climbed to PKR 10,639 million (up from PKR 7,937 million), while export revenue saw a significant surge to PKR 826 million compared to PKR 242 million in the previous year. In addition to core sugar sales, the company’s revenue stream was supported by its by-products, including molasses, bagasse, and press mud. During MY25, bagasse contributed PKR 178.7 million (MY24: PKR 177.1 million), and mud sales increased to PKR 15.8 million (MY24: PKR 10.9 million). Meanwhile, molasses remained a significant contributor at PKR 944.1 million, despite a slight decrease from the PKR 967.6 million reported in MY24. Looking ahead, overall revenue is expected to remain stable, underpinned by consistent domestic demand for sugar and the steady utilization of these secondary product streams.


Margins

The company's profitability indicators showed significant improvement in MY25, with the Gross Profit (GP) margin rising to 13.8% from 12.6% the previous year. This expansion was primarily driven by a 34.2% surge in sales volume, which effectively offset the rise in Cost of Goods Sold (COGS). This positive momentum flowed down to the operating level, where the operating profit margin increased to 10.8% (up from 9.3% in MY24). Most notably, net profit experienced a substantial turnaround, climbing to PKR 250 million from just PKR 2 million in the prior year, resulting in a Net Profit (NP) margin of 2.3%. This bottom-line growth was largely propelled by a reduction in finance costs, which fell to PKR 650 million from PKR 949 million.


Sustainability

The Company operates bagasse-based power plants with a combined generation capacity of 21.44 MW, including a recently installed 14.44 MW unit and an existing 7 MW unit. Going forward, the Company’s performance is expected to remain stable supported by continued improvement in profitability and financial metrics, while maintaining a prudent capital structure.


Financial Risk
Working capital

The company’s working capital management strengthened in MY25, with the gross working capital cycle shortening to 91 days from 102 days. This improvement was primarily due to more efficient inventory management, as inventory days dropped significantly to 69 days from 101 days. Trade receivable days were recorded at 22 days, while trade payable days saw a slight reduction to 11 days (compared to 15 days in MY24). Consequently, the net working capital cycle also improved, decreasing to 79 days from 88 days, reflecting enhanced operational liquidity.


Coverages

The company’s cash flow generation strengthened during the year, with Free Cash Flow from Operations (FCFO) rising to PKR 1,349 million from PKR 1,054 million in the prior year. This growth, coupled with a significant reduction in finance costs—which fell to PKR 650 million from PKR 949 million—led to a marked improvement in debt servicing capacity. Consequently, the interest coverage ratio climbed to 2.1x (up from 1.1x), while the EBITDA-to-finance cost ratio nearly doubled, reaching 2.4x compared to 1.3x in MY24.


Capitalization

Jauharabad maintains a conservative, low-leveraged capital structure that compares favorably to industry peers, with its debt-to-equity ratio improving to approximately 31.5% in MY25 (down from ~33.9% in MY24). As of MY25, the company’s total debt stood at PKR 2,948 million, primarily comprised of short-term borrowings (66.2%) alongside long-term obligations. Meanwhile, the equity base strengthened significantly, rising to approximately PKR 9,323 million from PKR 7,958 million in the previous year.


 
 

Mar-26

www.pacra.com


(PKR mln)


Dec-25
3M
Sep-25
12M
Sep-24
12M
Sep-23
12M
Management Audited Audited Audited
A. BALANCE SHEET
1. Non-Current Assets 11,482 11,489 10,278 9,818
2. Investments 88 88 15 15
3. Related Party Exposure 0 0 0 0
4. Current Assets 5,336 3,779 4,052 2,404
a. Inventories 2,312 1,153 2,902 1,525
b. Trade Receivables 976 1,237 53 6
5. Total Assets 16,905 15,356 14,344 12,237
6. Current Liabilities 796 809 1,398 1,075
a. Trade Payables 154 158 516 122
7. Borrowings 4,514 2,948 2,704 1,279
8. Related Party Exposure 1,272 1,346 1,384 875
9. Non-Current Liabilities 963 931 901 1,018
10. Net Assets 9,360 9,323 7,958 7,990
11. Shareholders' Equity 9,360 9,323 7,958 7,990
B. INCOME STATEMENT
1. Sales 2,054 10,727 7,996 6,926
a. Cost of Good Sold (1,792) (9,246) (6,987) (5,852)
2. Gross Profit 262 1,482 1,009 1,074
a. Operating Expenses (85) (325) (262) (241)
3. Operating Profit 177 1,157 747 833
a. Non Operating Income or (Expense) (3) (50) 168 (6)
4. Profit or (Loss) before Interest and Tax 174 1,106 916 826
a. Total Finance Cost (68) (650) (949) (560)
b. Taxation (69) (207) 35 (54)
6. Net Income Or (Loss) 37 250 2 212
C. CASH FLOW STATEMENT
a. Free Cash Flows from Operations (FCFO) 237 1,349 1,054 1,039
b. Net Cash from Operating Activities before Working Capital Changes 135 684 125 520
c. Changes in Working Capital (1,015) (229) (1,118) 88
1. Net Cash provided by Operating Activities (881) 456 (993) 608
2. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Investing Activities (77) (270) (765) (603)
3. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Financing Activities (77) (78) 473 (83)
4. Net Cash generated or (Used) during the period (1,035) 107 (1,285) (78)
D. RATIO ANALYSIS
1. Performance
a. Sales Growth (for the period) -23.4% 34.2% 15.5% 33.7%
b. Gross Profit Margin 12.8% 13.8% 12.6% 15.5%
c. Net Profit Margin 1.8% 2.3% 0.0% 3.1%
d. Cash Conversion Efficiency (FCFO adjusted for Working Capital/Sales) -37.9% 10.4% -0.8% 16.3%
e. Return on Equity [ Net Profit Margin * Asset Turnover * (Total Assets/Shareholders' Equity )] 1.6% 2.9% 0.0% 2.7%
2. Working Capital Management
a. Gross Working Capital (Average Days) 126 91 102 82
b. Net Working Capital (Average Days) 119 79 88 77
c. Current Ratio (Current Assets / Current Liabilities) 6.7 4.7 2.9 2.2
3. Coverages
a. EBITDA / Finance Cost 4.0 2.4 1.3 2.1
b. FCFO / Finance Cost+CMLTB+Excess STB 3.3 2.1 1.1 1.9
c. Debt Payback (Total Borrowings+Excess STB) / (FCFO-Finance Cost) 2.0 2.0 12.2 1.8
4. Capital Structure
a. Total Borrowings / (Total Borrowings+Shareholders' Equity) 38.2% 31.5% 33.9% 21.2%
b. Interest or Markup Payable (Days) 89.4 57.3 45.9 66.4
c. Entity Average Borrowing Rate 4.5% 11.3% 19.0% 16.0%

Mar-26

www.pacra.com

Mar-26

www.pacra.com

  1. Rating Team Statements
    1. Rating is just an opinion about the creditworthiness of the entity and does not constitute a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell any security of the entity rated or to buy, hold, or sell the security rated, as the case may be. (Chapter III; 14-3-(x))
    2. Conflict of Interest
      1. The Rating Team or any of their family members have no interest in this rating (Chapter III; 12-2-(j))
      2. PACRA, the analysts involved in the rating process, and members of its rating committee and their family members do not have any conflict of interest relating to the rating done by them (Chapter III; 12-2-(e) & (k))
      3. The analyst is not a substantial shareholder of the customer being rated by PACRA [Annexure F; d-(ii)]
      4. Explanation: for the purpose of the above clause, the term "family members" shall include only those family members who are dependent on the analyst and members of the rating committee.
  2. Restrictions
    1. No director, officer, or employee of PACRA communicates the information acquired by him for use for rating purposes to any other person, except where required under law to do so. (Chapter III; 10-(5))
    2. PACRA does not disclose or discuss with outside parties or make improper use of the non-public information which has come to its knowledge during a business relationship with the customer. (Chapter III; 10-7-(d))
    3. PACRA does not make proposals or recommendations regarding the activities of rated entities that could impact a credit rating of the entity subject to rating. (Chapter III; 10-7-(k))
  3. Conduct of Business
    1. PACRA fulfills its obligations in a fair, efficient, transparent, and ethical manner and renders high standards of services in performing its functions and obligations. (Chapter III; 11-A-(a))
    2. PACRA uses due care in the preparation of this Rating Report. Our information has been obtained from sources we consider to be reliable, but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. PACRA does not, in every instance, independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing this Rating Report. (Clause 11-(A)(p))
    3. PACRA prohibits its employees and analysts from soliciting money, gifts, or favors from anyone with whom PACRA conducts business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(q))
    4. PACRA ensures before the commencement of the rating process that an analyst or employee has not had a recent employment or other significant business or personal relationship with the rated entity that may cause or may be perceived as causing a conflict of interest. (Chapter III; 11-A-(r))
    5. PACRA maintains the principle of integrity in seeking rating business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(u))
    6. PACRA promptly investigates in the event of misconduct or a breach of the policies, procedures, and controls, and takes appropriate steps to rectify any weaknesses to prevent any recurrence, along with suitable punitive action against the responsible employee(s). (Chapter III; 11-B-(m))
  4. Independence & Conflict of Interest
    1. PACRA receives compensation from the entity being rated or any third party for the rating services it offers. The receipt of this compensation has no influence on PACRA’s opinions or other analytical processes. In all instances, PACRA is committed to preserving the objectivity, integrity, and independence of its ratings. Our relationship is governed by two distinct mandates: i) rating mandate - signed with the entity being rated or issuer of the debt instrument, and ii) fee mandate - signed with the payer, which can be different from the entity.
    2. PACRA does not provide consultancy/advisory services or other services to any of its customers or their associated companies and associated undertakings that are being rated or have been rated by it during the preceding three years, unless it has an adequate mechanism in place ensuring that the provision of such services does not lead to a conflict of interest situation with its rating activities. (Chapter III; 12-2-(d))
    3. PACRA discloses that no shareholder directly or indirectly holding 10% or more of the share capital of PACRA also holds directly or indirectly 10% or more of the share capital of the entity which is subject to rating or the entity which issued the instrument subject to rating by PACRA. (Chapter III; 12-2-(f))
    4. PACRA ensures that the rating assigned to an entity or instrument is not affected by the existence of a business relationship between PACRA and the entity or any other party, or the non-existence of such a relationship. (Chapter III; 12-2-(i))
    5. PACRA ensures that the analysts or any of their family members shall not buy, sell, or engage in any transaction in any security which falls in the analyst’s area of primary analytical responsibility. This clause, however, does not apply to investments in securities through collective investment schemes. (Chapter III; 12-2-(l))
    6. PACRA has established policies and procedures governing investments and trading in securities by its employees and for monitoring the same to prevent insider trading, market manipulation, or any other market abuse. (Chapter III; 11-B-(g))
  5. Monitoring and Review
    1. PACRA monitors all the outstanding ratings continuously, and any potential change therein due to any event associated with the issuer, the security arrangement, the industry, etc., is disseminated to the market immediately and in an effective manner after appropriate consultation with the entity/issuer. (Chapter III; 17-(a))
    2. PACRA reviews all the outstanding ratings periodically on an annual basis. Provided that public dissemination of annual review and in an instance of change in rating will be made. (Chapter III; 17-(b))
    3. PACRA initiates an immediate review of the outstanding rating upon becoming aware of any information that may reasonably be expected to result in downgrading of the rating. (Chapter III; 17-(c))
    4. PACRA engages with the issuer and the debt securities trustee to remain updated on all information pertaining to the rating of the entity/instrument. (Chapter III; 17-(d))
  6. Probability of Default
    1. PACRA’s Rating Scale reflects the expectation of credit risk. The highest rating has the lowest relative likelihood of default (i.e., probability). PACRA’s transition studies capture the historical performance behavior of a specific rating notch. Transition behavior of the assigned rating can be obtained from PACRA’s Transition Study available at our website. (www.pacra.com) However, the actual transition of rating may not follow the pattern observed in the past. (Chapter III; 14-3(f)(vii))
  7. Proprietary Information
    1. All information contained herein is considered proprietary by PACRA. Hence, none of the information in this document can be copied or otherwise reproduced, stored, or disseminated in whole or in part in any form or by any means whatsoever by any person without PACRA’s prior written consent.

Mar-26

www.pacra.com