Rating History
Dissemination Date Long-Term Rating Short-Term Rating Outlook Action Rating Watch
26-Mar-26 A- A2 Stable Maintain -
28-Mar-25 A- A2 Stable Maintain -
29-Mar-24 A- A2 Stable Maintain -
30-Mar-23 A- A2 Stable Maintain -
31-Mar-22 A- A2 Stable Maintain -
About the Entity

Sargodha Jute Mills Limited, incorporated in 1981, operates as an unquoted public limited company in Pakistan. The majority shareholding is held by Mr. Parvez Aslam and his family, with operational leadership under Mr. Imran Aslam (Chairman) and Mr. Irfan Aslam (CEO). The Company commenced commercial operations in 1984.

Rating Rationale

The ratings reflect Sargodha Jute Mills Limited’s (SJML) established presence in Pakistan’s jute industry, supported by its long operational history and stable relationships with key institutional customers. The Company manufactures jute products, including sacking bags, hessian cloth, yarn, twines, and related products. Pakistan’s jute industry plays an important role in the packaging of agricultural commodities, particularly wheat procured by government agencies. The sector largely relies on imported raw jute, mainly sourced from Bangladesh due to its superior fiber quality and cost competitiveness. Demand dynamics in the industry are therefore closely linked with government procurement policies, agricultural output, and export demand for jute-based products. Over time, the industry has faced structural challenges, including volatility in raw jute prices, currency fluctuations, and competition from synthetic packaging alternatives such as polypropylene bags. However, increasing global awareness regarding environmentally sustainable and biodegradable packaging materials has gradually strengthened the long-term relevance of jute products. Consequently, manufacturers in the sector continue to focus on improving operational efficiencies, diversifying product applications, and maintaining export linkages to sustain competitiveness. During FY25, the Company reported net sales of ~PKR 3,380mln, compared to ~PKR 5,162mln in FY24, reflecting a decline mainly due to lower demand for government wheat procurement bags, which historically constitute a major portion of the Company’s domestic sales. Export revenues remained relatively stable; however, overall volumes were affected by subdued demand and competitive market dynamics. The decline in margins was mainly attributable to fluctuations in raw jute prices and lower production volumes. Nevertheless, management continued to implement cost rationalization measures and operational efficiencies to support profitability. From a financial risk perspective, SJML maintains a low-leveraged capital structure, with borrowings largely comprising short-term facilities utilized to meet seasonal working capital requirements. The Company maintains a comfortable equity base backed by accumulated profits, while prudent working capital management supports its liquidity profile. The Company also holds a diversified investment portfolio, providing additional financial flexibility.

Key Rating Drivers

Going forward, the ratings incorporate management’s strategy to improve operational efficiencies, maintain cost discipline, and explore downstream product diversification to mitigate dependence on government procurement demand. The ratings remain dependent on the Company’s ability to maintain its market position amid evolving industry dynamics while preserving adequate profitability and a conservative financial risk profile.

Profile
Legal Structure

Sargodha Jute Mills Limited (hereafter referred to as “Sargodha Jute” or “the Company”) was established on February 10, 1981, as an unlisted Public Limited Company under the provisions of the repealed Companies Act, 1913 (now replaced by the Companies Act, 2017). The Company’s registered office is located at 7th Floor office # 702, Tricon Corporate Center, Jail Road, Gulberg-2, Lahore, while its regional office is located at 309 Uni Tower, 3rd Floor, I.I. Chundrigar Road, Karachi.


Background

The Company was founded in 1981 by the late Mian Muhammad Aslam. The group operates one jute mill and one textile mill. Following the founder's tenure, the operations of Sargodha Jute were entrusted to his son, Mian Parvez Aslam. Subsequently, the leadership transitioned to the next generation, with the two sons of Mian Parvez Aslam serving as the Chairman and CEO of the Company.


Operations

The core business activity of the Company revolves around the manufacturing, sale, and distribution of jute products, leveraging efficient machinery to maintain high standards of quality and operational effectiveness. Sargodha Jute Mills Limited offers a diverse product portfolio, which includes yarn, hessian cloth, hessian bags, sacking bags, and twines. Additionally, the Government of Pakistan is a key contributor to the Company’s revenue through substantial procurement of sacking bags. The Company’s installed production capacity is ~30,500 MT/annum (based on 360 operational days), with a utilization rate of ~28.93% in FY25 (FY24: ~38.56%).


Ownership
Ownership Structure

Mr. Parvez Aslam and his family collectively hold a majority ownership stake of ~70% in the Company. Within this, his sons, Mr. Irfan Aslam and Mr. Imran Aslam, each own a 28.31% share. Additionally, Shahzad Textile Mills Limited, an associated company, holds a 24.94% ownership stake in Sargodha Jute.


Stability

While there is currently no formal succession plan in place, the ownership of shares and business roles is evenly divided between the two sons of Mr. Parvez Aslam, Mr. Imran Aslam and Mr. Irfan Aslam. Mr. Irfan Aslam serves as the CEO of Sargodha Jute Mills Limited, while Mr. Imran Aslam holds the position of CEO at Shahzad Textile Mills Limited. Establishing formal documentation for succession planning could significantly enhance the long-term stability and continuity of the Company.


Business Acumen

Mr. Irfan Aslam, serving as the CEO of Sargodha Jute Mills Limited, brings over two decades of extensive experience in overseeing the Company’s operations. His strong strategic acumen and ability to make timely, effective decisions have been instrumental in steering the Company towards sustained growth and stability.


Financial Strength

Mr. Irfan Aslam holds a 24.8% ownership stake in the associated company, Shahzad Textile Mills Limited, which boasts a robust asset base of ~PKR 6.3bln as of Jun’25. In addition to his business interests, Mr. Irfan Aslam demonstrates a strong financial acumen through active investments in diverse sectors, including real estate, the stock market, and foreign exchange markets. The Company is expected to get timely support from its sponsors, if needed.


Governance
Board Structure

The Company's board comprises three members, two of whom belong to the sponsoring family. Mr. Irfan, serving as the CEO, and Mr. Ahsan, acting as the COO, hold executive director positions. Meanwhile, Mr. Imran, who chairs the board, serves as a non-executive director. The compact size of the board, with key leadership roles primarily held within the sponsoring family, reflects a concentrated and efficient decision-making approach. However, an independent oversight could enhance the governance structure, fostering greater transparency and balance in strategic decision-making.


Members’ Profile

Mr. Irfan Aslam, a graduate of a prestigious foreign university, brings over two decades of expertise in the jute industry and currently serves as the CEO of Sargodha Jute Mills Limited. While Mr. Imran Aslam, with a strong foothold in the textile sector, holds the position of CEO at Shahzad Textile Mills Limited. Their extensive experience and leadership have been pivotal in driving the Company’s growth and sustainability.


Board Effectiveness

The board’s overall effectiveness is hindered by its limited size and the significant influence of the sponsoring family, which may affect diverse and balanced decision-making. Additionally, the practice of board meetings held on an “as and when needed” basis reduces the opportunity for structured and regular oversight. Furthermore, the lack of independent directors and the absence of specialized board committees limit the board’s ability to provide robust governance and strategic guidance.


Financial Transparency

Crowe Hussain Chaudhry & Co., Chartered Accountants, a QCR-rated firm and listed in the category ‘A’ on SBP’s panel of auditors, serves as the Company’s external auditors. They have expressed an unqualified opinion on the annual financial statements for the year ended June 30, 2025.


Management
Organizational Structure

The Company’s organizational framework is structured into two primary divisions: the Head Office and the Mills. All key positions within the organization are filled. Major functional departments include (i) Accounts & Finance, (ii) Procurement, and (iii) Production. The Chief Financial Officer (CFO) directly reports to the Chief Executive Officer (CEO), establishing a clear financial oversight hierarchy. Meanwhile, the Purchase Manager and the Manager Commercial from the Head Office, along with the Mill Managers, report to the Chief Operating Officer (COO), fostering streamlined coordination between the operational and managerial divisions.


Management Team

Mr. Irfan Aslam, the CEO, is a graduate of a reputed foreign university and brings over two decades of extensive experience in the jute industry. He holds the authority to make strategic decisions for the Company, ensuring its continued growth and success. Supporting him is Mr. Imran Haider, the CFO, who has been associated with the group for nine years and has served in his current role for one year. Mr. Ahsan Ahmad Khan, the COO, has dedicated 29 years to Sargodha Jute Mills Limited and possesses a wealth of experience in the jute industry, overseeing day-to-day operations. Another key team member is Mr. Ayyaz Ali Shahid, the Manager Commercial, who has been with the Company for the past seven years. He specializes in raw jute procurement from Bangladesh, a critical component of the Company’s supply chain. Additionally, the finance department is primarily headed by Mr. Tahir, the General Manager of Finance, who ensures effective financial management and oversight within the organization.


Effectiveness

With the support of a highly skilled and experienced team of professionals, Sargodha Jute continues to enhance its business capabilities. The management functions are well-defined and supported by a strong IT infrastructure and comprehensive internal controls, enabling effective operational oversight and decision-making. However, the lack of management committees and an internal audit function limits the ability to ensure seamless communication and coordination across various functions.


MIS

Sargodha Jute Mills uses oracle-based ERP system by the name of Wizmen. Regular reporting of sales figures, raw materials positions, payables & receivables, and income statement on a monthly basis is shared with top management. Secondly, the Company uses Kaspersky registered antivirus software to protect the data of the Company. On the other hand, data from the production facility is shared on a real-time basis because point to point link has been developed between the mill and the head office.


Control Environment

The Company is ISO 9001-2015 certified, reflecting its adherence to internationally recognized quality management standards. A dedicated quality control department ensures the consistent delivery of high-quality products to customers. Additionally, the Company has implemented an efficient system for addressing customer complaints and providing prompt resolutions, further enhancing customer satisfaction. However, the establishment of an internal audit function could strengthen transparency and reinforce internal controls, contributing to a more robust governance framework.


Business Risk
Industry Dynamics

Pakistan’s economy continued to face macroeconomic headwinds during FY25, including elevated energy costs, high inflationary pressures, and tight monetary conditions for most of the year. These factors adversely impacted business operations by increasing input costs and constraining end-user demand, particularly in sectors dependent on government procurement. While interest rates were reduced toward the latter part of FY25, economic recovery remained gradual and uneven. During FY25, the domestic market capitalization of the Jute Sector was estimated at ~PKR 49.4bln, reflecting an increase compared to ~PKR 46.4bln in FY24, largely in line with nominal GDP growth and inflationary effects. However, sector fundamentals weakened, as total production of jute goods declined by ~26.8% YoY, falling to ~30,000 MT in FY25 from ~41,000 MT in FY24. Over the last five years (FY21–FY25), sector production has contracted by ~57.2%, underscoring sustained structural challenges. Among product categories, sacking bags remained the dominant segment, contributing ~46.7% of total production at ~14,000 MT, though output declined sharply by ~46.2% YoY. Hessian cloth accounted for ~43.3% of production at ~13,000 MT, while miscellaneous products contributed the remaining ~10.0%. The decline in production was primarily driven by lower government offtake, elevated raw jute prices, and reduced capacity utilization across the sector. The installed production capacity of the five major jute mills remained unchanged at ~114,300 MT in FY25. However, capacity utilization deteriorated further, reflecting subdued demand and cautious production planning. The sector remains highly concentrated, with Thal Limited and Sargodha Jute Mills collectively accounting for ~56% of total installed capacity, reinforcing their dominant position despite overall sector contraction.


Relative Position

Pakistan’s jute industry operates as an oligopolistic market, characterized by a limited number of players and high entry barriers due to capital intensity and reliance on imported raw material. Sargodha Jute Mills Limited remains one of the two largest players in the sector, with an installed production capacity of ~30,500 MT per annum. As per management estimates, Sargodha Jute Mills commands a market share of ~40%, positioning it as a key supplier, particularly for government tenders related to sacking bags. Thal Limited, the largest competitor, holds a marginally higher installed capacity of ~33,800 MT, translating into a slightly larger market share. Together, the two companies dominate the sector in terms of scale, and operational experience. The remainder of the market is fragmented among smaller players, including Indus Jute Mills (~20,000 MT), White Pearl Jute Mills (~15,000 MT), and Madina Jute Mills (~15,000 MT). These players collectively hold a smaller share of production and have limited pricing power compared to the two dominant mills. Given the continued contraction in sector production during FY25, relative positioning has become increasingly important, favouring larger players like Sargodha Jute Mills due to their operational flexibility, balance sheet strength, and established buyer relationships.


Revenues

During FY25, Sargodha Jute Mills Limited’s revenue declined sharply to ~PKR 3,380mln from ~PKR 5,162mln in FY24, reflecting a contraction of ~34.5%. The decline was primarily driven by a significant reduction in both local and export sales. Local sales reduced to ~PKR 3,337mln (FY24: ~PKR 3,380mln), while export revenues declined to ~PKR 569mln (FY24: ~PKR 581mln). The subdued performance reflects the absence of government procurement volumes and continued pressure on export competitiveness amid elevated input costs.


Margins

Profitability moderated during FY25 following the elevated margins observed in FY24. The gross margin declined to ~11.0% (FY24: ~16.7%), mainly due to higher raw material and energy costs amid lower sales volumes. Consequently, the operating margin reduced to ~4.6% (FY24: ~12.1%). However, the net profit margin improved to ~9.7% (FY24: ~5.2%), largely supported by sizeable non-operating income, including gains from disposal of assets and investment-related income.


Sustainability

The Company remains proactive in addressing challenges by implementing strategic measures to mitigate adverse impacts. To reduce escalating energy costs, the Company has invested in renewable energy solutions, completing its full solar installation by 30 June 2025. Prior to FY2024-25, the Company had 300 KW of solar capacity already in place. During the FY2024-25, an additional 1940 KW was installed, bringing the total installed solar capacity to approximately 2.2 MW.  This milestone demonstrates the Company's commitment to sustainability and long-term cost efficiency. Jute bags remain the Company's flagship product, valued for their environmentally friendly and biodegradable properties. With growing social awareness and a global shift towards eco-friendly products, jute bags are well-positioned to become the preferred choice among consumers, further enhancing the Company's market appeal and long-term sustainability.


Financial Risk
Working capital

The Company’s working capital position weakened in FY25, with gross working capital days increasing to ~227 days (FY24: ~139 days) and net working capital days rising to ~218 days (FY24: ~134 days). The deterioration was primarily driven by elevated inventory levels, particularly raw material and finished goods, as sales volumes remained subdued, resulting in a stretched cash conversion cycle.


Coverages

Free cash flows from operations declined significantly to ~PKR 122mln in FY25 (FY24: ~PKR 621mln), mainly due to adverse working capital movements. Finance costs reduced to ~PKR 80mln (FY24: ~PKR 323mln) following lower borrowings, resulting in an EBITDA coverage of ~5.3x (FY24: ~2.7x). The Company maintained a strong liquidity cushion through its investment portfolio comprising ~PKR 402mln in TDRs and ~PKR 836mln in listed equity investments. 


Capitalization

The Company’s leverage remained low and manageable, with total borrowings at ~PKR 509mln in FY25, translating into a leverage of ~10.7% (FY24: ~10.0%). The debt profile remained entirely short-term, utilized to meet working capital requirements. Equity levels remained healthy, supported by retained earnings and revaluation surplus.


 
 

Mar-26

www.pacra.com


(PKR mln)


Jun-25
12M
Jun-24
12M
Jun-23
12M
A. BALANCE SHEET
1. Non-Current Assets 1,968 2,191 2,287
2. Investments 1,238 702 511
3. Related Party Exposure 0 0 0
4. Current Assets 2,971 2,650 2,849
a. Inventories 1,528 1,095 1,200
b. Trade Receivables 803 770 869
5. Total Assets 6,177 5,543 5,647
6. Current Liabilities 990 1,003 880
a. Trade Payables 62 87 51
7. Borrowings 509 410 909
8. Related Party Exposure 0 0 0
9. Non-Current Liabilities 448 454 414
10. Net Assets 4,230 3,676 3,443
11. Shareholders' Equity 4,230 3,676 3,443
B. INCOME STATEMENT
1. Sales 3,380 5,162 8,113
a. Cost of Good Sold (3,007) (4,300) (7,063)
2. Gross Profit 373 862 1,050
a. Operating Expenses (216) (239) (300)
3. Operating Profit 157 623 751
a. Non Operating Income or (Expense) 340 97 (76)
4. Profit or (Loss) before Interest and Tax 497 720 675
a. Total Finance Cost (80) (323) (327)
b. Taxation (90) (129) (171)
6. Net Income Or (Loss) 328 269 178
C. CASH FLOW STATEMENT
a. Free Cash Flows from Operations (FCFO) 122 621 658
b. Net Cash from Operating Activities before Working Capital Changes 35 295 325
c. Changes in Working Capital (287) 410 33
1. Net Cash provided by Operating Activities (253) 705 358
2. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Investing Activities 133 (107) (119)
3. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Financing Activities 99 (499) (350)
4. Net Cash generated or (Used) during the period (21) 99 (111)
D. RATIO ANALYSIS
1. Performance
a. Sales Growth (for the period) -34.5% -36.4% 24.5%
b. Gross Profit Margin 11.0% 16.7% 12.9%
c. Net Profit Margin 9.7% 5.2% 2.2%
d. Cash Conversion Efficiency (FCFO adjusted for Working Capital/Sales) -4.9% 20.0% 8.5%
e. Return on Equity [ Net Profit Margin * Asset Turnover * (Total Assets/Shareholders' Equity )] 8.3% 7.5% 5.8%
2. Working Capital Management
a. Gross Working Capital (Average Days) 227 139 94
b. Net Working Capital (Average Days) 218 134 92
c. Current Ratio (Current Assets / Current Liabilities) 3.0 2.6 3.2
3. Coverages
a. EBITDA / Finance Cost 5.3 2.7 3.0
b. FCFO / Finance Cost+CMLTB+Excess STB 2.0 2.1 2.2
c. Debt Payback (Total Borrowings+Excess STB) / (FCFO-Finance Cost) 0.0 0.0 0.0
4. Capital Structure
a. Total Borrowings / (Total Borrowings+Shareholders' Equity) 10.7% 10.0% 20.9%
b. Interest or Markup Payable (Days) 69.6 27.0 30.3
c. Entity Average Borrowing Rate 13.0% 26.7% 19.8%

Mar-26

www.pacra.com

Mar-26

www.pacra.com

  1. Rating Team Statements
    1. Rating is just an opinion about the creditworthiness of the entity and does not constitute a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell any security of the entity rated or to buy, hold, or sell the security rated, as the case may be. (Chapter III; 14-3-(x))
    2. Conflict of Interest
      1. The Rating Team or any of their family members have no interest in this rating (Chapter III; 12-2-(j))
      2. PACRA, the analysts involved in the rating process, and members of its rating committee and their family members do not have any conflict of interest relating to the rating done by them (Chapter III; 12-2-(e) & (k))
      3. The analyst is not a substantial shareholder of the customer being rated by PACRA [Annexure F; d-(ii)]
      4. Explanation: for the purpose of the above clause, the term "family members" shall include only those family members who are dependent on the analyst and members of the rating committee.
  2. Restrictions
    1. No director, officer, or employee of PACRA communicates the information acquired by him for use for rating purposes to any other person, except where required under law to do so. (Chapter III; 10-(5))
    2. PACRA does not disclose or discuss with outside parties or make improper use of the non-public information which has come to its knowledge during a business relationship with the customer. (Chapter III; 10-7-(d))
    3. PACRA does not make proposals or recommendations regarding the activities of rated entities that could impact a credit rating of the entity subject to rating. (Chapter III; 10-7-(k))
  3. Conduct of Business
    1. PACRA fulfills its obligations in a fair, efficient, transparent, and ethical manner and renders high standards of services in performing its functions and obligations. (Chapter III; 11-A-(a))
    2. PACRA uses due care in the preparation of this Rating Report. Our information has been obtained from sources we consider to be reliable, but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. PACRA does not, in every instance, independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing this Rating Report. (Clause 11-(A)(p))
    3. PACRA prohibits its employees and analysts from soliciting money, gifts, or favors from anyone with whom PACRA conducts business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(q))
    4. PACRA ensures before the commencement of the rating process that an analyst or employee has not had a recent employment or other significant business or personal relationship with the rated entity that may cause or may be perceived as causing a conflict of interest. (Chapter III; 11-A-(r))
    5. PACRA maintains the principle of integrity in seeking rating business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(u))
    6. PACRA promptly investigates in the event of misconduct or a breach of the policies, procedures, and controls, and takes appropriate steps to rectify any weaknesses to prevent any recurrence, along with suitable punitive action against the responsible employee(s). (Chapter III; 11-B-(m))
  4. Independence & Conflict of Interest
    1. PACRA receives compensation from the entity being rated or any third party for the rating services it offers. The receipt of this compensation has no influence on PACRA’s opinions or other analytical processes. In all instances, PACRA is committed to preserving the objectivity, integrity, and independence of its ratings. Our relationship is governed by two distinct mandates: i) rating mandate - signed with the entity being rated or issuer of the debt instrument, and ii) fee mandate - signed with the payer, which can be different from the entity.
    2. PACRA does not provide consultancy/advisory services or other services to any of its customers or their associated companies and associated undertakings that are being rated or have been rated by it during the preceding three years, unless it has an adequate mechanism in place ensuring that the provision of such services does not lead to a conflict of interest situation with its rating activities. (Chapter III; 12-2-(d))
    3. PACRA discloses that no shareholder directly or indirectly holding 10% or more of the share capital of PACRA also holds directly or indirectly 10% or more of the share capital of the entity which is subject to rating or the entity which issued the instrument subject to rating by PACRA. (Chapter III; 12-2-(f))
    4. PACRA ensures that the rating assigned to an entity or instrument is not affected by the existence of a business relationship between PACRA and the entity or any other party, or the non-existence of such a relationship. (Chapter III; 12-2-(i))
    5. PACRA ensures that the analysts or any of their family members shall not buy, sell, or engage in any transaction in any security which falls in the analyst’s area of primary analytical responsibility. This clause, however, does not apply to investments in securities through collective investment schemes. (Chapter III; 12-2-(l))
    6. PACRA has established policies and procedures governing investments and trading in securities by its employees and for monitoring the same to prevent insider trading, market manipulation, or any other market abuse. (Chapter III; 11-B-(g))
  5. Monitoring and Review
    1. PACRA monitors all the outstanding ratings continuously, and any potential change therein due to any event associated with the issuer, the security arrangement, the industry, etc., is disseminated to the market immediately and in an effective manner after appropriate consultation with the entity/issuer. (Chapter III; 17-(a))
    2. PACRA reviews all the outstanding ratings periodically on an annual basis. Provided that public dissemination of annual review and in an instance of change in rating will be made. (Chapter III; 17-(b))
    3. PACRA initiates an immediate review of the outstanding rating upon becoming aware of any information that may reasonably be expected to result in downgrading of the rating. (Chapter III; 17-(c))
    4. PACRA engages with the issuer and the debt securities trustee to remain updated on all information pertaining to the rating of the entity/instrument. (Chapter III; 17-(d))
  6. Probability of Default
    1. PACRA’s Rating Scale reflects the expectation of credit risk. The highest rating has the lowest relative likelihood of default (i.e., probability). PACRA’s transition studies capture the historical performance behavior of a specific rating notch. Transition behavior of the assigned rating can be obtained from PACRA’s Transition Study available at our website. (www.pacra.com) However, the actual transition of rating may not follow the pattern observed in the past. (Chapter III; 14-3(f)(vii))
  7. Proprietary Information
    1. All information contained herein is considered proprietary by PACRA. Hence, none of the information in this document can be copied or otherwise reproduced, stored, or disseminated in whole or in part in any form or by any means whatsoever by any person without PACRA’s prior written consent.

Mar-26

www.pacra.com