Rating History
Dissemination Date Long-Term Rating Short-Term Rating Outlook Action Rating Watch
26-Mar-26 BBB A2 Stable Maintain -
28-Mar-25 BBB A2 Stable Maintain -
29-Mar-24 BBB A2 Stable Maintain -
30-Mar-23 BBB A2 Stable Maintain -
30-Mar-22 BBB A2 Stable Initial -
About the Entity

Ultra Pack (Pvt.) Limited, incorporated in 2016, is a private limited concern principally engaged in the production & sale of PP bags. During 2017, the Company formally started its operations by installing the latest Extrusion & Bag Conversion technologies. The Company is wholly owned by ANS Capital (Pvt.) Ltd. (~100%) through sponsoring family. Mr. Ibrahim Tanseer Sheikh is the CEO of the Company. He has 14 years of diversified professional experience in cement and paper & packaging sectors. He is assisted by a team of qualified professionals.

Rating Rationale

Ultra Pack (Pvt.) Limited (UPPL) is engaged in the manufacturing of polypropylene (PP) based industrial packaging solutions, primarily catering to the cement sector. The company has an installed production capacity of ~126 million bags per annum and commands an estimated market share of around 21% in the PP bag segment in the North region. A key strength of the company remains its strong business linkage with its affiliated entity, Kohat Cement Company Limited, which provides a stable demand base and supports business continuity even during periods of industry volatility. The operating environment during FY25 and the 1HFY26 has shown gradual improvement following a period of subdued activity and lower capacity utilization across the cement sector. Macroeconomic indicators have begun to stabilize, supported by relative stability in the foreign exchange market and a gradual easing in policy rates and inflation. These developments have contributed to a recovery in domestic construction and infrastructure-related activities. As a result, cement dispatches recorded an increase of ~10% year on year, reaching about 25.8 million tons. The improvement in sector activity has positively influenced demand for cement packaging, allowing UPPL to record higher utilization levels during the 1HFY26. The PP bag manufacturing industry remains dependent on imported polypropylene resin, the pricing of which is closely linked with international crude oil trends. Recently, crude oil prices have exhibited volatility amid ongoing geopolitical tensions and escalations. This exposes manufacturers to potential pressure on input costs, particularly when coupled with exchange rate fluctuations. Such dynamics may affect the company’s ability to sustain margins in the medium term. In addition, elevated raw material prices may indirectly dampen construction activity by increasing overall building costs. In response to these challenges, the company is exploring opportunities to broaden its revenue base. Management is actively pursuing export prospects and undertaking product diversification initiatives. In this regard, the company has started expanding into the stitched bag segment to tap demand from the agricultural supply chain, particularly flour and rice milling sectors, which may provide an additional avenue for growth and reduce reliance on a single end user industry. Financial performance during 1HFY26 reflects an improvement in operational activity. The company’s topline increased by 18% compared to the corresponding period last year, primarily driven by higher sales volumes. Profitability indicators also improved across operating and net levels, supported by better capacity utilization and improved margins. The company’s financial risk profile remains characterized by modest coverages and cash flow generation. The capital structure is leveraged and largely supported by short term borrowings, while the equity base remains relatively modest.

Key Rating Drivers

The ratings remain dependent on UPPL’s ability to sustain its market position amid a challenging industry landscape while enhancing its financial performance. Successful execution of diversification plans, prudent working capital management, and maintaining sufficient cash flows and coverage ratios will be crucial for the company's rating. Any significant decline in profitability and coverage metrics could impact the ratings adversely.

Profile
Legal Structure

Ultra Pack (Pvt.) Limited (‘Ultra Pack’ or ‘the Company’), a subsidiary of ANS Capital is a private limited entity incorporated in 2016.


Background

Ultra Pack (Pvt.) Limited (UPPL) was incorporated in 2016 to provide industrial packaging solutions, primarily catering to the cement sector, including its associated concern, Kohat Cement Company Limited. The Company commenced full commercial operations in 2017 with the installation of modern extrusion and bag conversion technologies. UPPL’s head office is located in Gulberg III, Lahore, while its manufacturing facility is situated at Sunder Industrial Estate, Lahore. Over time, the Company has leveraged the brand strength of its sponsoring group, ANS Capital, enabling it to establish itself as a notable player in the polypropylene (PP) bag manufacturing segment, currently accounting for approximately 21% of the country’s PP bag production capacity.


Operations

Ultra Pack Pvt. Limited (UPPL) is primarily engaged in the manufacturing and distribution of specialized Polypropylene (PP) packaging solutions, operating an installed capacity of ~126 million units per annum through advanced Extrusion and Bag Conversion technologies. The Company’s product portfolio includes Block-Bottom AD-Star Bags for cement, chemicals, and salt; Block-Bottom Open-Mouth Bags for industrial chemicals, animal feed, and agricultural products; Laminated Stitched Bags for the flour, sugar, and rice milling sectors; and Woven PP Fabric for bulk packaging and textile applications. In FY25, UPPL maintained ~50% capacity utilization amid a recovery in domestic infrastructure demand, while strategically expanding its footprint in the agricultural sector to diversify revenues away from the cyclical cement industry. The Company manages a robust import cycle for plastic granules, primarily from Saudi Arabia and the UAE, and operates through a well-defined organizational structure supported by an Oracle-based ERP (R12), facilitating real-time monitoring of production and financial reporting. As of 6MFY26, operations remain on a growth trajectory, supported by increased off-take in the agricultural segment.


Ownership
Ownership Structure

Ultra Pack Pvt. Limited is wholly owned by the sponsoring family through ANS Capital (Pvt.) Limited (~100%), with the majority stakes held by Mr. Nadeem Atta Sheikh (~41.87%) and Mr. Aizaz Mansoor Sheikh (~28.59%), while the remaining ~29.54% is held by other family members. This concentrated ownership ensures strong control and alignment with the long-term strategic interests of the broader group, which includes Kohat Cement Company Limited.


Stability

The Company exhibits a stable ownership structure, with no major changes expected in the near term, as 100% of shares are held by ANS Capital (Pvt.) Limited. Organizational stability is supported by zero turnover in top management over recent years, ensuring continuity in operational knowledge and strategic initiatives. A formalized line of succession and clearly defined family shareholding could further enhance governance clarity. The long-term association of the sponsoring family and consistent oversight by ANS Capital anchor the Company’s strategic direction.


Business Acumen

The Sheikh family, sponsors of UPPL, are considered to possess strong business acumen, with decades of experience across cement, paper, and packaging sectors. Their deep expertise in manufacturing, logistics, and large-scale industrial packaging provides UPPL with operational and strategic advantages. The family’s successful track record with Kohat Cement Company, a leading player in the cement sector, strengthens UPPL’s supply chain management and market positioning, enabling the Company to sustain a ~21% market share in the competitive PP bag segment.


Financial Strength

The financial profile of the flagship entity, Kohat Cement Company, is strong, with substantial access to capital markets. Consequently, the sponsors’ capacity to provide financial support to UPPL, if required, is considered high, reinforcing the Company’s credit and operational stability.


Governance
Board Structure

The Board of Ultra Pack Pvt. Limited comprises three members, all affiliated with the sponsoring family: CEO Mr. Ibrahim Tanseer Sheikh and Executive Directors Mr. Omer Aizaz Sheikh and Mr. Faisal Atta Sheikh. While the absence of independent directors may constrain impartial oversight, the board benefits from seasoned professionals with an average of ~15 years of relevant experience and a consistent association with the company over eight years. The family-led structure, typical of large private limited entities in Pakistan, enables swift decision-making and close coordination with affiliates, including Kohat Cement Company, ANS Capital (Pvt.) Ltd, and Ultra Kraft (Pvt.) Ltd.


Members’ Profile

The board members bring substantial industrial and business experience, complemented by positions in ANS Capital (Pvt.) Ltd and Ultra Kraft (Pvt.) Ltd. CEO Mr. Ibrahim Tanseer Sheikh provides 14 years of leadership, focusing on operational efficiency and market expansion. Executive Director Mr. Omer Aizaz Sheikh contributes 19 years of business experience, representing ANS Capital, while Mr. Faisal Atta Sheikh brings 11 years of experience across Ultra Kraft and ANS Capital. CFO Mr. Haider Abbas, an ACCA member, provides strong financial leadership and professional expertise.


Board Effectiveness

Although formal board committees are not established, the Board demonstrates a high level of engagement and strategic oversight. Board members are generally available and maintain regular participation in board meetings, ensuring that key operational and strategic decisions are deliberated effectively. The sponsors’ direct involvement supports alignment with group strategy, reinforces internal control frameworks, and enables the company to respond proactively to input cost fluctuations and changing market dynamics.


Financial Transparency

Crowe Hussain Chaudhury & Co., Chartered Accountants (QCR-rated), serve as the external auditors of Ultra Pack Pvt. Limited. For the year ended June 30, 2025, the auditors issued an unqualified opinion on the financial statements, reflecting strong adherence to accounting standards and reliable financial reporting. The presence of professional auditors reinforces confidence in the accuracy and integrity of the Company’s financial disclosures.


Management
Organizational Structure

Ultra Pack Pvt. Limited maintains a well-defined organizational structure, ensuring clear reporting lines and effective operational oversight. Key functions reporting to the CEO include Accounting & Finance, Administration & Security, Internal Audit, IT, Marketing & Sales, HRM, Quality Assurance, and Compliance & QHSE, while the Director Operations oversees Supply Chain, Purchasing, and Production. The structure facilitates accountability, streamlined decision-making, and coordination across all business functions.


Management Team

The management team is led by CEO Mr. Ibrahim Tanseer Sheikh, who brings extensive industry experience and long-standing association with the company. He is supported by a team of qualified professionals with specialized expertise, including the CFO, marketing, and plant operations heads. Collectively, the management team provides the necessary technical, financial, and operational oversight to drive strategic objectives and support the company’s expansion across multiple cities in Pakistan.


Effectiveness

With clear roles and responsibilities, the management team demonstrates effectiveness in executing strategic initiatives and operational objectives. The defined functional structure allows the Company to leverage the experience of its personnel to strengthen business operations and enhance market presence.


MIS

The Company utilizes an Oracle-based ERP solution (version R-12), integrating multiple operational modules to monitor daily and monthly performance. This system enables data-driven decision-making across all departments, enhancing efficiency and operational transparency.


Control Environment

Ultra Pack maintains an in-house internal audit function responsible for continuous implementation and monitoring of policies and procedures. This ensures operational efficiency, mitigates risks, and strengthens the internal control environment across all business functions.


Business Risk
Industry Dynamics

The Pakistani packaging industry is a diversified sector dominated by paper, plastic, tinplate, and glass, with paper and plastic maintaining the largest market shares due to their versatility and critical role in industrial applications. For the Company, which specializes in polypropylene (PP) bags, raw material costs are closely linked to international crude oil prices. As of early 2026, the global energy landscape remains volatile due to geopolitical tensions and regional energy deficits, while local industrial energy tariffs further elevate operational costs. Profitability in the sector remains exposed to cost pressures from exchange rate fluctuations and rising energy expenses, which are often difficult to fully pass on to end consumers. Demand for the Company’s products is closely tied to the cement industry, which has shown recovery in FY26, with local dispatches demonstrating strong year-on-year growth, particularly in the North Region where the Company primarily operates. Macroeconomic indicators point to a revival in domestic construction and real estate activity, supporting packaging demand. However, the industry remains sensitive to fiscal policies, such as Federal Excise Duty adjustments, and to supply chain concentration, with significant portions of cost of goods linked to energy (~50%) and raw materials (~12%), underlining the continued exposure of packaging operations to energy tariffs and commodity price movements.


Relative Position

Ultra Pack (Pvt.) Limited manufactures & sells premium quality Polypropylene bags. In the PP bags segment, Syntronics is the largest player in the industry with an installed capacity of ~216mln units followed by Cherat Packaging with capacity of ~180mln units. In polypropylene packaging segment, Ultra Pack holds ~21.4% share in the country’s production capacity.


Revenues

Primarily, the Company derives its revenues from the manufacturing and sale of PP Bags, followed by coated fabric, laminated stitched bags, and woven fabric. During FY25, the Company’s topline stood at PKR 2,201 million, reflecting a decline compared to FY24 (PKR 2,497 million). On an annual basis, the topline declined from PKR 2,668 million in FY23 to PKR 2,497 million in FY24 and further to PKR 2,201 million in FY25, registering a negative growth trend of -6.4% in FY24 and -11.8% in FY25. During 6MFY26, sales stood at PKR 1,300 million, indicating early signs of volume recovery.


Margins

The Company’s gross profit declined to PKR 195 million in FY25 (FY24: PKR 236 million), with the gross margin reducing to ~8.9% (FY24: ~9.5%). Operating profit declined to PKR 24 million in FY25 (FY24: PKR 64 million), resulting in an operating margin of ~1.1% (FY24: ~2.6%). Consequently, the Company reported a net loss of PKR 68 million in FY25, translating into a net margin of ~-3.1%, compared to a net profit of PKR 29 million (net margin: ~1.1%) in FY24. During 6MFY26, the Company reported a net loss of PKR 11 million, reflecting continued margin pressure.


Sustainability

As of March 2026, the sector's sustainability is supported by a recovery in the construction industry and a 13.1% YoY increase in domestic cement dispatches, driven by stabilized macroeconomic conditions and previous monetary easing. While lower interest rates and renewed infrastructure activity bolster revenue prospects, the industry remains vulnerable to geopolitical volatility and regional energy deficits that fluctuate the cost of PP resin. Intense competition and high price sensitivity persist, necessitating a focus on operational efficiency and diversification into agricultural packaging to mitigate the cyclical risks associated with the cement sector.


Financial Risk
Working capital

Ultra Pack’s working capital requirements are met through internal cash flows and borrowings. In FY25, average inventory days improved to 40 days (FY24: 45 days), while gross working capital days remained stable at 93 days (FY24: 94 days). Trade receivable days increased to 53 days (FY24: 49 days), leading to an extension in the net working capital cycle to 61 days (FY24: 54 days). During 6MFY26, net working capital days improved to 28 days, supported by better receivables management.


Coverages

In FY25, the Company generated negative FCFO of PKR 44 million (FY24: PKR 71 million), driven by weaker profitability and working capital pressures. As a result, the FCFO-to-finance cost ratio declined to -0.7x (FY24: 1.8x), while EBITDA-to-finance cost coverage weakened to 1.0x (FY24: 3.2x). During 6MFY26, FCFO improved to PKR 10 million, though coverage metrics remain constrained.


Capitalization

Ultra Pack maintained a leveraged capital structure in FY25, with total borrowings-to-capitalization at ~38.3%, compared to ~39.3% in FY24. Total borrowings declined to PKR 191 million in FY25 from PKR 255 million in FY24, with borrowings primarily utilized for working capital financing. As of 6MFY26, total borrowings stood at PKR 179 million, indicating a slight deleveraging trend.


 
 

Mar-26

www.pacra.com


(PKR mln)


Dec-25
6M
Jun-25
12M
Jun-24
12M
Jun-23
12M
A. BALANCE SHEET
1. Non-Current Assets 701 672 642 675
2. Investments 0 43 38 27
3. Related Party Exposure 0 0 0 47
4. Current Assets 1,143 913 1,072 1,021
a. Inventories 270 258 231 379
b. Trade Receivables 392 138 497 177
5. Total Assets 1,844 1,629 1,752 1,770
6. Current Liabilities 624 441 436 619
a. Trade Payables 403 253 140 406
7. Borrowings 179 191 255 118
8. Related Party Exposure 292 235 235 229
9. Non-Current Liabilities 73 74 71 78
10. Net Assets 676 687 755 726
11. Shareholders' Equity 676 687 755 726
B. INCOME STATEMENT
1. Sales 1,300 2,201 2,497 2,668
a. Cost of Good Sold (1,167) (2,006) (2,261) (2,369)
2. Gross Profit 132 195 236 300
a. Operating Expenses (128) (171) (172) (142)
3. Operating Profit 4 24 64 158
a. Non Operating Income or (Expense) 42 14 34 (23)
4. Profit or (Loss) before Interest and Tax 46 38 98 135
a. Total Finance Cost (35) (74) (48) (30)
b. Taxation (22) (32) (21) (37)
6. Net Income Or (Loss) (11) (68) 29 67
C. CASH FLOW STATEMENT
a. Free Cash Flows from Operations (FCFO) 10 (44) 71 83
b. Net Cash from Operating Activities before Working Capital Changes (11) (81) 28 51
c. Changes in Working Capital (75) 255 (333) (52)
1. Net Cash provided by Operating Activities (86) 173 (305) (0)
2. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Investing Activities 16 (68) 46 215
3. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Financing Activities 45 (64) 143 (200)
4. Net Cash generated or (Used) during the period (25) 41 (116) 15
D. RATIO ANALYSIS
1. Performance
a. Sales Growth (for the period) 18.1% -11.8% -6.4% 1.2%
b. Gross Profit Margin 10.2% 8.9% 9.5% 11.2%
c. Net Profit Margin -0.8% -3.1% 1.1% 2.5%
d. Cash Conversion Efficiency (FCFO adjusted for Working Capital/Sales) -4.9% 9.6% -10.5% 1.2%
e. Return on Equity [ Net Profit Margin * Asset Turnover * (Total Assets/Shareholders' Equity )] -3.2% -9.4% 3.9% 9.7%
2. Working Capital Management
a. Gross Working Capital (Average Days) 74 93 94 83
b. Net Working Capital (Average Days) 28 61 54 29
c. Current Ratio (Current Assets / Current Liabilities) 1.8 2.1 2.5 1.7
3. Coverages
a. EBITDA / Finance Cost 2.1 1.0 3.2 7.3
b. FCFO / Finance Cost+CMLTB+Excess STB 0.3 -0.7 1.8 3.3
c. Debt Payback (Total Borrowings+Excess STB) / (FCFO-Finance Cost) -6.8 -2.1 7.7 3.9
4. Capital Structure
a. Total Borrowings / (Total Borrowings+Shareholders' Equity) 41.0% 38.3% 39.3% 32.3%
b. Interest or Markup Payable (Days) 341.6 250.1 84.8 57.7
c. Entity Average Borrowing Rate 14.9% 15.5% 10.3% 6.0%

Mar-26

www.pacra.com

Mar-26

www.pacra.com

  1. Rating Team Statements
    1. Rating is just an opinion about the creditworthiness of the entity and does not constitute a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell any security of the entity rated or to buy, hold, or sell the security rated, as the case may be. (Chapter III; 14-3-(x))
    2. Conflict of Interest
      1. The Rating Team or any of their family members have no interest in this rating (Chapter III; 12-2-(j))
      2. PACRA, the analysts involved in the rating process, and members of its rating committee and their family members do not have any conflict of interest relating to the rating done by them (Chapter III; 12-2-(e) & (k))
      3. The analyst is not a substantial shareholder of the customer being rated by PACRA [Annexure F; d-(ii)]
      4. Explanation: for the purpose of the above clause, the term "family members" shall include only those family members who are dependent on the analyst and members of the rating committee.
  2. Restrictions
    1. No director, officer, or employee of PACRA communicates the information acquired by him for use for rating purposes to any other person, except where required under law to do so. (Chapter III; 10-(5))
    2. PACRA does not disclose or discuss with outside parties or make improper use of the non-public information which has come to its knowledge during a business relationship with the customer. (Chapter III; 10-7-(d))
    3. PACRA does not make proposals or recommendations regarding the activities of rated entities that could impact a credit rating of the entity subject to rating. (Chapter III; 10-7-(k))
  3. Conduct of Business
    1. PACRA fulfills its obligations in a fair, efficient, transparent, and ethical manner and renders high standards of services in performing its functions and obligations. (Chapter III; 11-A-(a))
    2. PACRA uses due care in the preparation of this Rating Report. Our information has been obtained from sources we consider to be reliable, but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. PACRA does not, in every instance, independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing this Rating Report. (Clause 11-(A)(p))
    3. PACRA prohibits its employees and analysts from soliciting money, gifts, or favors from anyone with whom PACRA conducts business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(q))
    4. PACRA ensures before the commencement of the rating process that an analyst or employee has not had a recent employment or other significant business or personal relationship with the rated entity that may cause or may be perceived as causing a conflict of interest. (Chapter III; 11-A-(r))
    5. PACRA maintains the principle of integrity in seeking rating business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(u))
    6. PACRA promptly investigates in the event of misconduct or a breach of the policies, procedures, and controls, and takes appropriate steps to rectify any weaknesses to prevent any recurrence, along with suitable punitive action against the responsible employee(s). (Chapter III; 11-B-(m))
  4. Independence & Conflict of Interest
    1. PACRA receives compensation from the entity being rated or any third party for the rating services it offers. The receipt of this compensation has no influence on PACRA’s opinions or other analytical processes. In all instances, PACRA is committed to preserving the objectivity, integrity, and independence of its ratings. Our relationship is governed by two distinct mandates: i) rating mandate - signed with the entity being rated or issuer of the debt instrument, and ii) fee mandate - signed with the payer, which can be different from the entity.
    2. PACRA does not provide consultancy/advisory services or other services to any of its customers or their associated companies and associated undertakings that are being rated or have been rated by it during the preceding three years, unless it has an adequate mechanism in place ensuring that the provision of such services does not lead to a conflict of interest situation with its rating activities. (Chapter III; 12-2-(d))
    3. PACRA discloses that no shareholder directly or indirectly holding 10% or more of the share capital of PACRA also holds directly or indirectly 10% or more of the share capital of the entity which is subject to rating or the entity which issued the instrument subject to rating by PACRA. (Chapter III; 12-2-(f))
    4. PACRA ensures that the rating assigned to an entity or instrument is not affected by the existence of a business relationship between PACRA and the entity or any other party, or the non-existence of such a relationship. (Chapter III; 12-2-(i))
    5. PACRA ensures that the analysts or any of their family members shall not buy, sell, or engage in any transaction in any security which falls in the analyst’s area of primary analytical responsibility. This clause, however, does not apply to investments in securities through collective investment schemes. (Chapter III; 12-2-(l))
    6. PACRA has established policies and procedures governing investments and trading in securities by its employees and for monitoring the same to prevent insider trading, market manipulation, or any other market abuse. (Chapter III; 11-B-(g))
  5. Monitoring and Review
    1. PACRA monitors all the outstanding ratings continuously, and any potential change therein due to any event associated with the issuer, the security arrangement, the industry, etc., is disseminated to the market immediately and in an effective manner after appropriate consultation with the entity/issuer. (Chapter III; 17-(a))
    2. PACRA reviews all the outstanding ratings periodically on an annual basis. Provided that public dissemination of annual review and in an instance of change in rating will be made. (Chapter III; 17-(b))
    3. PACRA initiates an immediate review of the outstanding rating upon becoming aware of any information that may reasonably be expected to result in downgrading of the rating. (Chapter III; 17-(c))
    4. PACRA engages with the issuer and the debt securities trustee to remain updated on all information pertaining to the rating of the entity/instrument. (Chapter III; 17-(d))
  6. Probability of Default
    1. PACRA’s Rating Scale reflects the expectation of credit risk. The highest rating has the lowest relative likelihood of default (i.e., probability). PACRA’s transition studies capture the historical performance behavior of a specific rating notch. Transition behavior of the assigned rating can be obtained from PACRA’s Transition Study available at our website. (www.pacra.com) However, the actual transition of rating may not follow the pattern observed in the past. (Chapter III; 14-3(f)(vii))
  7. Proprietary Information
    1. All information contained herein is considered proprietary by PACRA. Hence, none of the information in this document can be copied or otherwise reproduced, stored, or disseminated in whole or in part in any form or by any means whatsoever by any person without PACRA’s prior written consent.

Mar-26

www.pacra.com