Rating History
Dissemination Date Long-Term Rating Short-Term Rating Outlook Action Rating Watch
19-Mar-26 A A1 Stable Maintain -
20-Mar-25 A A1 Stable Maintain -
20-Mar-24 A A1 Stable Maintain -
20-Mar-23 A A1 Stable Initial -
About the Entity

US Denim Mills (Pvt). Limited is a private limited Company incorporated on January 18, 2005. The Company operates under the umbrella of AJ Holdings (Pvt). Limited. The operational infrastructure comprises a weaving unit with 229 air jet looms and 20 power looms. The overall control of the board rests with ten-members from the sponsoring families. The position of CEO is vested in Mr. M. Irfan Nazir Ahmed. He has twenty-nine years of professional experience and holds an MBA qualification.

Rating Rationale

US Denim Mills (Pvt). Limited (“UDML” or “the Company)” is a recognized name in Pakistan’s weaving industry. Operating within the fabric vertical of the US Group, the Company has established its position as a leading denim fabric manufacturer, catering to the top international clientele. This is underpinned by its cutting-edge production capabilities and stringent quality control measures. Over the years, the Company’s topline has demonstrated steady growth in business volumes, supported by enhanced geographical presence with its offices in the US and Turkey.

Indirect exports remain the primary revenue contributor, with a significant portion derived from inter-group (captive) business. The Company’s revenue base moderated marginally (FY25: PKR 27.8bln; FY24: PKR 29.6bln) primarily due to product pricing challenges, following the imposition of US reciprocal tariffs alongside intense competition from the regional players. While there was upward push in the cost, the market conditions did not allow sale prices to be revised upwards. Strategically, the Company continues to prioritize a profit-centric approach rather than relying solely on volumetric expansion. The gross profit margin was compressed, attributed to an inflated production cost. Key factors impacting the core profitability were expensive cotton procurement, elevated energy tariffs and a revision in wage rate. Deployment of surplus funds in bank deposits augmented the net profitability. However, this benefit was partially offset by the taxation expense, leading to a dilution in the bottom line (FY25: PKR 240mln; FY24: PKR 1.5bln).

The Company finances its working capital requirements primarily through internal cash generation and the subsidized EFS Scheme by the SBP. The sponsors have a conservative stance towards conventional debt, supporting a strong financial risk profile. The working capital cycle and coverages of the Company remain within a manageable range. On the sustainability front, the management intends to improve the operational efficiency through BMR in its existing manufacturing facility.
.

Key Rating Drivers

The ratings are contingent on the Company’s ability to sustain a strong business profile amid current market conditions, while generating adequate cash flows, maintaining a stable topline, and preserving profitability. Any deterioration in the financial risk profile will have a negative impact on the assigned ratings.

Profile
Legal Structure

US Denim Mills (Private). Limited ("UDML" or "the Company") was incorporated on January 18, 2005, as a private Company.


Background

The Company is categorized under the fabric vertical of the US Group. The group established its first manufacturing facility in 1985, and over the years, it strategically expanded its business operations in the textile sector, emerging as a prominent business group. With evolving industry trends, the group shifted its focus to denim jeans in 2008.


Operations

The Company is engaged in the manufacturing and sale of denim fabric. Its registered office and manufacturing facility are located at 3-KM, Defence Raiwind Road, Lahore. UDML has a wholly-owned subsidiary, US Fashion Turkey Tekstil Ticaret Anonim Sirketi. The Company’s manufacturing facility is equipped with 229 air-jet looms and 20 power looms. The total energy requirement of the Company is 706,444 mmBTU, primarily met through natural gas and biomass as the main energy sources. However, secondary sources, including diesel, furnace oil, WAPDA, LPG, and solar power, are on standby to ensure continuity in case of the unavailability of the primary sources.


Ownership
Ownership Structure

UDML is a prominent business venture of two sponsoring families (Mr. Mian Muhammad Ahsan & Mr. Javed Arshad Bhatti) of the US (Umer-Siddique) Group. It is a wholly owned subsidiary of AJ Holdings (Private) Limited. The holding Company exercises its control over the Company’s board by virtue of its 100% stake in the Company.


Stability

The entire ownership is held by the sponsoring group, which primarily oversees investments in subsidiary and associated companies, ensuring the stability of the corporate structure. So, the Company's ownership structure is expected to remain stable in the foreseeable future.


Business Acumen

US Group is recognized as the leading exporter of denim and twill in Pakistan, supported by a rich history of operations in the textile industry. Despite its focus on a single sector, the group has consistently demonstrated resilience and growth through various economic cycles.


Financial Strength

The Company’s affiliation with the US group demonstrates the strong financial muscle of the sponsors. According to the US Group Sustainability Report CY23, the group size is estimated at USD 356mln. The group includes four additional companies within the industry: (i) US Apparel & Textiles (Pvt). Limited, (ii) Stylers International Limited, (iii) US Workwear and (iv) US Dyeing & Finishing. The sponsors possess a strong financial capacity to support the Company, if needed.


Governance
Board Structure

UDML is a business venture of the US (Umer-Siddique) Group. The overall control of the board rests with ten members from the sponsoring families. The inclusion of an independent director will strengthen the overall governance framework of the Company.


Members’ Profile

The two founders of the U.S Group, Mr. Javed Arshad Bhatti, Chairman of the Board, and Mr. Mian Muhammad Ahsan, have been associated with the Company for over 19 years. All board members have relevant stature and extensive experience, which bodes well for the consistent growth and long-term sustainability of the Company.


Board Effectiveness

The Company has established two committees to oversee key business matters: the Audit Committee and the Performance Assessment Committee. Board meetings are held monthly to review operations and assess the progress toward targets. The discussions on various aspects are formally documented in meeting minutes; however, there is still room for improvement.


Financial Transparency

To uphold high standards of transparency, BDO Ebrahim & Co. Chartered Accountants have been appointed as the external auditors of the Company, rated in "Category A" by the SBP panel of auditors. They expressed an unqualified opinion on the financial statements of the Company for the year ended June 30th, 2025. 


Management
Organizational Structure

The Company maintains a well-defined organizational structure divided into several functional departments, namely: (i) Finance, (ii) Marketing, (iii) Quality Assurance, (iv) Operations, (v) Information Technology, (vi) Supply Chain, and (vii) HR & Admin, and procurement functions. All departments report to their respective GM(s), who are responsible for delivering the bottom line and achieving targets. All the GMs report to the CEO.


Management Team

Mr. Irfan Nazir Ahmad, the CEO, holds an MBA qualification and boasts 29 years of ample experience in the Textile & Apparel Industry, covering Sales & Marketing, General Management, Production Management, and Supply Chain. His tenure includes roles at Reshi Textiles, Azgard Nine Limited, US Denim, and US Apparel, followed by an association with the US group since 2014. Mr. Syed Farrukh Ali, the CFO, has been associated with the group since 2001. He is a Chartered Management Accountant.


Effectiveness

The Company has established two formal management committees: the Purchase Committee and the Waste Management Committee. Regular management meetings are held to discuss and address operational issues, with follow-up actions taken to resolve any challenges proactively. These meetings are led by the Company's CEO.


MIS

The Company’s daily and monthly Management Information System (MIS) includes comprehensive performance reports, which are regularly reviewed by senior management. Acknowledging the importance of robust information systems to ensure operational efficiency, the Company has implemented the Oracle-based ERP solution, Oracle E-Business Suite, Harmony version 4, to streamline processes and enhance decision-making capabilities.


Control Environment

US Denim utilizes management systems as its mechanism for ensuring effective controls. There is clear evidence of these systems being audited and certified externally. Examples of this include ISO 14001, GOTS, C2C at the gold level, AWS, OCS, GRS, RCS, Higg FEM 3.0, SLCP, ICS Environment, BSCI, and Oeko-Tex.


Business Risk
Industry Dynamics

Textile exports reached USD 17.9bln in FY25, a modest rise from USD 16.7bln the previous year, reflecting a 7.2% year-over-year growth. The largest contribution came from the composite and garments segment, at USD 14bln, which included the weaving segment at USD 1.8bln and the spinning segment at USD 0.7bln. The production of cotton cloth in FY25 declined by approximately 0.7% year over year, reaching around 877.1mln square meters. During FY25, about 25.3% of the cotton cloth produced was exported (compared to roughly 27.2% in FY24), with the rest used for the domestic market. The country's fabric exports fell by approximately 4.4% in FY25 (FY24: up about 5.8% YoY), with approximately 23.4% of Pakistan's cotton cloth exports going to Bangladesh (compared to about 19.9% in FY24), followed by the USA with about 8.1% of cotton cloth exports (compared to approximately 7.8% in FY24). In FY25, the transition from the final tax regime to the normal tax regime is expected to affect the profitability of export-oriented units, with a 29% tax on profits and a super tax of up to 10%. The recent removal of GST exemption (Finance Bill, 2025) on textile inputs for exporters registered under the Export Facilitation Scheme (EFS) will offer tax protection and create a level playing field for domestic cotton and yarn producers. Currently, international cotton prices are higher than the price of locally produced cotton. The gap has widened to approximately 9.8 cents per pound (as of July 18, 2025), resulting in an average increase of about USD 36.8 per bale of imported cotton. A greater reliance on imported cotton could lead to higher raw material costs, ultimately impacting yarn prices and profit margins for the sector. Conversely, energy and finance costs are expected to stay within a range, given the projected reduction in interest rates and the absence of any major energy tariff increases. Considering the current climate change, flooding in major cotton regions, and shifting crop patterns, the target of approximately 10.2mln bales for FY26 appears challenging.


Relative Position

With an overall production capacity of 229 air-jet looms and 20 power looms, the Company falls in the mid-tier of the respective universe.


Revenues

A significant portion of the Company’s revenue base is generated from local sales, inclusive of indirect exports. During FY25, the Company’s topline declined to PKR 27.8bln (FY24: PKR 29.6bln), reflecting a contraction of 6.3% year-on-year. The decrease was primarily attributable to the imposition of US reciprocal tariffs and a relatively stable exchange rate environment, which reduced the price competitiveness of the Company’s products in international markets. Consequently, direct exports also depicted a similar trend, standing at PKR 9.4bln compared to PKR 9.7bln in FY24. Indirect sales continue to constitute a sizeable share of the Company’s revenue base, contributing PKR 18.0bln during FY25 (FY24: PKR 19.2bln).


Geographically, the Company maintains a diversified export footprint, with presence in Bangladesh, Egypt, Turkiye, Sri Lanka, Uzbekistan, Jordan, the United Arab Emirates, and several other markets, reflecting low geographic concentration risk. Local sales, however, declined sharply to PKR 353.3mln during FY25 (FY24: PKR 726.4mln), following a minimal contribution from the processing segment. Domestically, the Company supplies to well-established industry players, including Interloop Limited, Nishat Mills Limited, Artistic Garment Industries (Pvt.) Limited, and Soorty Enterprises (Pvt.) Limited, among others. Client concentration remains elevated owing to the predominance of inter-group sales; however, the Group’s longstanding track record and established business relationships provide comfort.


Margins

The Company’s gross profit margin inched down to 11.5% in FY25 (FY24: 12.2%) on the back of elevated production costs. Consequently, the operating margin declined to 3.8% (FY24: 7.8%), primarily due to a notable increase in salaries and wages expenses alongside the customer claims. Owing to minimal reliance on external funding sources, the Company’s finance cost remained relatively low, reported at PKR 69mln (FY24: PKR 52mln), mainly comprising bank and other charges. However, taxation expense increased significantly by ~63% year-on-year to PKR 391mln (FY24: PKR 240mln) following the transition from the Final Tax Regime (FTR) to the Normal Tax Regime (NTR), a trend observed across the industry. As a result, the Company’s bottom line declined sharply to PKR 240mln in FY25 (FY24: PKR 1.5bln). Consequently, the net profit margin reduced to 0.9% compared to 5.1% in the corresponding period last year.


Sustainability

The management remains cognizant of the risks associated with rising energy costs and has implemented proactive measures to mitigate their impact on operations. To reduce dependency on conventional energy sources, the Group has successfully invested in renewable energy initiatives, including fully operational solar and biomass projects, which contribute to cost efficiency. In line with its commitment to sustainability, the management has integrated a robust Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) framework at the Group level, focusing on continuous investment in environment-friendly projects. These initiatives not only support operational resilience but also enhance the Group’s long-term sustainability profile in line with the best global practices.


Financial Risk
Working capital

The Company primarily finances its working capital requirements through internally generated cash flows. As of FY25, the net working capital cycle extended to 43 days (FY24: 36 days), primarily due to a modest elongation in the inventory cycle, which stood at 47 days (FY24: 41 days). The Company retains sufficient borrowing capacity, supported by manageable short-term trade leverage, and maintains an adequate liquidity profile to meet operational and financial obligations.


Coverages

As of FY25, the Company’s free cash flows from operations (FCFO) declined significantly to PKR 474mln (FY24: PKR 1.8bln), primarily due to the contraction in profit before tax. Despite this decline, key coverage metrics, including interest coverage and core operating coverage, remained within a comfortable range. The debt payback period, however, increased to 2.0 years in FY25 (FY24: 0.8 years), indicative of a slightly increased timeframe required for debt retirement.


Capitalization

The Company has maintained a low-leveraged capital structure, with debt primarily comprising interest-free loans from related parties and the subsidized Export Finance Scheme (EFS) from the State Bank of Pakistan (SBP). During FY25, the Company’s total leverage declined to 13.5% (FY24: 17.6%), reflecting the strategic repayment of related-party loans. Concurrently, the Company’s equity base strengthened to PKR 9.7bln (FY24: PKR 8.3bln), supported by the plowback of profits from the previous year. 


 
 

Mar-26

www.pacra.com


(PKR mln)


Jun-25
12M
Jun-24
12M
Jun-23
12M
Audited Audited Audited
A. BALANCE SHEET
1. Non-Current Assets 4,489 4,854 4,938
2. Investments 0 0 0
3. Related Party Exposure 1,483 618 363
4. Current Assets 10,107 10,327 9,325
a. Inventories 3,457 3,648 3,071
b. Trade Receivables 4,309 4,883 4,633
5. Total Assets 16,079 15,799 14,626
6. Current Liabilities 4,772 5,643 5,382
a. Trade Payables 4,340 5,372 5,077
7. Borrowings 713 350 0
8. Related Party Exposure 854 1,459 837
9. Non-Current Liabilities 0 0 0
10. Net Assets 9,740 8,347 8,407
11. Shareholders' Equity 9,740 8,347 8,407
B. INCOME STATEMENT
1. Sales 27,812 29,684 22,059
a. Cost of Good Sold (24,615) (26,053) (17,664)
2. Gross Profit 3,197 3,630 4,395
a. Operating Expenses (2,135) (1,318) (1,056)
3. Operating Profit 1,062 2,312 3,339
a. Non Operating Income or (Expense) (362) (519) (253)
4. Profit or (Loss) before Interest and Tax 700 1,793 3,086
a. Total Finance Cost (69) (52) (36)
b. Taxation (391) (240) (175)
6. Net Income Or (Loss) 240 1,502 2,876
C. CASH FLOW STATEMENT
a. Free Cash Flows from Operations (FCFO) 474 1,844 3,354
b. Net Cash from Operating Activities before Working Capital Changes 474 1,844 3,354
c. Changes in Working Capital (427) (36) (85)
1. Net Cash provided by Operating Activities 47 1,808 3,269
2. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Investing Activities (874) (258) (31)
3. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Financing Activities 1,080 (1,296) (3,356)
4. Net Cash generated or (Used) during the period 253 254 (118)
D. RATIO ANALYSIS
1. Performance
a. Sales Growth (for the period) -6.3% 34.6% -4.6%
b. Gross Profit Margin 11.5% 12.2% 19.9%
c. Net Profit Margin 0.9% 5.1% 13.0%
d. Cash Conversion Efficiency (FCFO adjusted for Working Capital/Sales) 0.2% 6.1% 14.8%
e. Return on Equity [ Net Profit Margin * Asset Turnover * (Total Assets/Shareholders' Equity )] 2.7% 17.9% 35.0%
2. Working Capital Management
a. Gross Working Capital (Average Days) 107 100 126
b. Net Working Capital (Average Days) 43 36 43
c. Current Ratio (Current Assets / Current Liabilities) 2.1 1.8 1.7
3. Coverages
a. EBITDA / Finance Cost 17.1 46.5 112.4
b. FCFO / Finance Cost+CMLTB+Excess STB 7.0 36.8 97.7
c. Debt Payback (Total Borrowings+Excess STB) / (FCFO-Finance Cost) 2.0 0.8 0.2
4. Capital Structure
a. Total Borrowings / (Total Borrowings+Shareholders' Equity) 13.5% 17.6% 8.8%
b. Interest or Markup Payable (Days) 0.0 0.0 0.0
c. Entity Average Borrowing Rate 4.1% 4.3% 3.7%

Mar-26

www.pacra.com

Mar-26

www.pacra.com

  1. Rating Team Statements
    1. Rating is just an opinion about the creditworthiness of the entity and does not constitute a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell any security of the entity rated or to buy, hold, or sell the security rated, as the case may be. (Chapter III; 14-3-(x))
    2. Conflict of Interest
      1. The Rating Team or any of their family members have no interest in this rating (Chapter III; 12-2-(j))
      2. PACRA, the analysts involved in the rating process, and members of its rating committee and their family members do not have any conflict of interest relating to the rating done by them (Chapter III; 12-2-(e) & (k))
      3. The analyst is not a substantial shareholder of the customer being rated by PACRA [Annexure F; d-(ii)]
      4. Explanation: for the purpose of the above clause, the term "family members" shall include only those family members who are dependent on the analyst and members of the rating committee.
  2. Restrictions
    1. No director, officer, or employee of PACRA communicates the information acquired by him for use for rating purposes to any other person, except where required under law to do so. (Chapter III; 10-(5))
    2. PACRA does not disclose or discuss with outside parties or make improper use of the non-public information which has come to its knowledge during a business relationship with the customer. (Chapter III; 10-7-(d))
    3. PACRA does not make proposals or recommendations regarding the activities of rated entities that could impact a credit rating of the entity subject to rating. (Chapter III; 10-7-(k))
  3. Conduct of Business
    1. PACRA fulfills its obligations in a fair, efficient, transparent, and ethical manner and renders high standards of services in performing its functions and obligations. (Chapter III; 11-A-(a))
    2. PACRA uses due care in the preparation of this Rating Report. Our information has been obtained from sources we consider to be reliable, but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. PACRA does not, in every instance, independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing this Rating Report. (Clause 11-(A)(p))
    3. PACRA prohibits its employees and analysts from soliciting money, gifts, or favors from anyone with whom PACRA conducts business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(q))
    4. PACRA ensures before the commencement of the rating process that an analyst or employee has not had a recent employment or other significant business or personal relationship with the rated entity that may cause or may be perceived as causing a conflict of interest. (Chapter III; 11-A-(r))
    5. PACRA maintains the principle of integrity in seeking rating business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(u))
    6. PACRA promptly investigates in the event of misconduct or a breach of the policies, procedures, and controls, and takes appropriate steps to rectify any weaknesses to prevent any recurrence, along with suitable punitive action against the responsible employee(s). (Chapter III; 11-B-(m))
  4. Independence & Conflict of Interest
    1. PACRA receives compensation from the entity being rated or any third party for the rating services it offers. The receipt of this compensation has no influence on PACRA’s opinions or other analytical processes. In all instances, PACRA is committed to preserving the objectivity, integrity, and independence of its ratings. Our relationship is governed by two distinct mandates: i) rating mandate - signed with the entity being rated or issuer of the debt instrument, and ii) fee mandate - signed with the payer, which can be different from the entity.
    2. PACRA does not provide consultancy/advisory services or other services to any of its customers or their associated companies and associated undertakings that are being rated or have been rated by it during the preceding three years, unless it has an adequate mechanism in place ensuring that the provision of such services does not lead to a conflict of interest situation with its rating activities. (Chapter III; 12-2-(d))
    3. PACRA discloses that no shareholder directly or indirectly holding 10% or more of the share capital of PACRA also holds directly or indirectly 10% or more of the share capital of the entity which is subject to rating or the entity which issued the instrument subject to rating by PACRA. (Chapter III; 12-2-(f))
    4. PACRA ensures that the rating assigned to an entity or instrument is not affected by the existence of a business relationship between PACRA and the entity or any other party, or the non-existence of such a relationship. (Chapter III; 12-2-(i))
    5. PACRA ensures that the analysts or any of their family members shall not buy, sell, or engage in any transaction in any security which falls in the analyst’s area of primary analytical responsibility. This clause, however, does not apply to investments in securities through collective investment schemes. (Chapter III; 12-2-(l))
    6. PACRA has established policies and procedures governing investments and trading in securities by its employees and for monitoring the same to prevent insider trading, market manipulation, or any other market abuse. (Chapter III; 11-B-(g))
  5. Monitoring and Review
    1. PACRA monitors all the outstanding ratings continuously, and any potential change therein due to any event associated with the issuer, the security arrangement, the industry, etc., is disseminated to the market immediately and in an effective manner after appropriate consultation with the entity/issuer. (Chapter III; 17-(a))
    2. PACRA reviews all the outstanding ratings periodically on an annual basis. Provided that public dissemination of annual review and in an instance of change in rating will be made. (Chapter III; 17-(b))
    3. PACRA initiates an immediate review of the outstanding rating upon becoming aware of any information that may reasonably be expected to result in downgrading of the rating. (Chapter III; 17-(c))
    4. PACRA engages with the issuer and the debt securities trustee to remain updated on all information pertaining to the rating of the entity/instrument. (Chapter III; 17-(d))
  6. Probability of Default
    1. PACRA’s Rating Scale reflects the expectation of credit risk. The highest rating has the lowest relative likelihood of default (i.e., probability). PACRA’s transition studies capture the historical performance behavior of a specific rating notch. Transition behavior of the assigned rating can be obtained from PACRA’s Transition Study available at our website. (www.pacra.com) However, the actual transition of rating may not follow the pattern observed in the past. (Chapter III; 14-3(f)(vii))
  7. Proprietary Information
    1. All information contained herein is considered proprietary by PACRA. Hence, none of the information in this document can be copied or otherwise reproduced, stored, or disseminated in whole or in part in any form or by any means whatsoever by any person without PACRA’s prior written consent.

Mar-26

www.pacra.com