Rating History
Dissemination Date Long-Term Rating Short-Term Rating Outlook Action Rating Watch
27-Feb-26 BBB A2 Stable Maintain -
28-Feb-25 BBB A2 Stable Maintain -
01-Mar-24 BBB A2 Stable Maintain -
02-Mar-23 BBB A2 Stable Maintain -
02-Mar-22 BBB A2 Stable Upgrade -
About the Entity

Basfa Textile (Pvt.) Ltd (“BTPL” or “the Company”), incorporated and operational since 2006, is engaged in the manufacturing and sale of Cotton and Viscos Yarn. Mr. Babar Jahangir, the CEO/Chairman of the Company holds 44.4% shareholding and the remaining stake vests with Mr. Ahmed Jahangir (30.0%) and Mr. Fahad Jahangir (25.6%). The board comprises three sponsor family members. Mr. Babar Jahangir has been with the Company since 2008. His innovative technological skills in the field of the textile sector bring specialized and comprehensive knowledge to the board.

Rating Rationale

The assigned ratings of Basfa Textile (Pvt.) Limited (“BTPL” or “the Company”) reflect its operating footprint within Pakistan’s spinning sector, underpinned by a moderate production scale and adequate financial flexibility. The Company operates with an installed capacity of 60,156 spindles, primarily producing viscose and cotton-based yarn. BTPL’s demand remained closely linked to the performance of downstream value-added exporters, resulting in intermittent softness in order inflows. A key strength is witnessed in the Company’s energy efficiency strategy, anchored in its solarization initiative to cater to rising energy costs. This initiative is fully funded through internal cash flows only, underscoring the Company’s financial discipline.
During FY25, the Company recorded net revenue of PKR 4.1bln (FY24: PKR 5.9bln), driven by a strategic shift toward finer yarn counts (40s, 52s, and 60s). While this rationalization enhanced margin sustainability, it led to reduced volumetric throughput due to extended processing cycles and higher energy intensity. BTPL successfully commissioned an additional 1.2MW solar capacity, raising aggregate renewable energy capacity to 3.3MW against a sanctioned load of 5.9MW. This structural shift is expected to enhance cost efficiency and strengthen long-term competitiveness, amid persistently elevated grid tariffs. The operational recovery gained momentum in 1HFY26, with revenues augmenting to PKR 2.7bln (1HFY25: PKR 2.3bln), supported by normalization of production cycles and improved energy efficiency.
The Company’s financial risk profile is assessed as adequate, underpinned by working capital discipline and moderate leverage. During FY25, total borrowings declined, resulting in an improved leverage ratio of 34.5% (FY24: 46.9%). However, the first half of FY26 witnessed an uptick in short-term financing to support working capital requirements. The working capital cycle increased to 98 days during FY25 due to elevated inventory days. During 1HFY26, the working capital cycle compressed to 67 days, driven by inventory rationalization and an advance-based sales model. Governance and management practices are considered adequate for the Company’s operating scale, supported by sponsor oversight, long-tenured management, and clear functional segregation. Nonetheless, institutional strengthening through ERP implementation, enhanced board independence, and formalized governance frameworks remains a key medium-term priority. While business concentration persists due to single-line operations, this is partially mitigated by sponsor commitment, operational continuity, and established customer relationships.

Key Rating Drivers

The ratings are dependent upon the management's ability to sustain their capacity utilization, generate sufficient cashflows, and maintain coverages at an optimal level. The corporate governance framework needs improvement. Adherence to the debt matrix at an adequate level is a prerequisite for the assigned rating.

Profile
Legal Structure

Basfa Textile (Pvt.) Limited (“BTPL” or “the Company”), incorporated in 2006, commenced commercial operations in 2008. The Company operates as a privately held limited liability entity, with its corporate head office located at 20-KM Ferozepur Road, Lahore.


Background

BTPL was founded by Mr. Jahangir Saleem, who previously operated in the automotive coatings and chemical resins segment through Basfa Industries (Pvt.) Limited and Auto Coatings (Pvt.) Limited. Leveraging his industrial experience, the sponsor diversified into the textile spinning sector, establishing BTPL as a dedicated yarn manufacturing enterprise.The Company’s name, “BASFA”, is derived from the initials of the sponsor’s four sons, Mr. Babar Jahangir, Mr. Sajid Jahangir, Mr. Fahad Jahangir, and Mr. Ahmad Jahangir, reflecting the family-owned and operated nature of the business and the long-term generational orientation embedded within the ownership structure.


Operations

The Company is principally engaged in the manufacturing and sale of viscose and cotton yarn, operating with a total installed capacity of 60,156 spindles. The product portfolio comprises viscose yarn marketed under the brand “Super-Diamond” and cotton yarn marketed under the brand “Super-Gold.” Operations are geographically diversified across two production facilities:


Unit 1: Located at 36-KM Ferozepur Road, Lahore, with an installed capacity of 38,136 spindles.

Unit 2: Situated at Feroz Watwan Road, Chandi Kot Stop, Sheikhupura, with an installed capacity of 22,020 spindles.


During the review period, the Company continued to optimize its product mix toward finer yarn counts, in line with its strategy to enhance margin sustainability and cater to higher-value downstream segments. Concurrently, the Company undertook material investments in renewable energy, significantly strengthening operational resilience and cost efficiency.


Ownership
Ownership Structure

BTPL is entirely owned by the Jahangir Saleem family, maintaining 100% sponsor control. The shareholding structure is as follows:


Mr. Babar Jahangir (Chairman / CEO): 44.40%

Mr. Ahmad Jahangir: 30.00%

Mr. Fahad Jahangir: 25.60%


The ownership structure reflects complete sponsor alignment, enabling swift strategic execution, centralized oversight, and long-term business continuity.


Stability

The ownership profile is considered strong and stable, underpinned by documented succession planning and progressive intergenerational transition. The sponsor, Mr. Jahangir Saleem, has proactively distributed ownership among his sons, ensuring clarity in leadership succession, continuity of strategic vision, and organizational stability. This structured transition significantly mitigates key-man risk and enhances long-term business sustainability.


Business Acumen

The sponsors possess diversified industrial experience, spanning automotive coatings, chemical resins, and textile spinning. Mr. Babar Jahangir brings over 19 years of operational and managerial experience, complemented by strong technical orientation and process optimization capabilities. His hands-on leadership style and technological inclination have enabled the Company to successfully modernize its production profile, improve energy efficiency, and optimize operational controls, thereby strengthening competitive positioning within a highly cost-sensitive industry.


Financial Strength

As a single-line business, BTPL inherently carries business concentration risk; however, this is partially mitigated by the sponsors’ demonstrated financial capacity, commitment, and historical support, particularly during cyclical downturns and investment phases. The sponsors’ ability to inject liquidity, absorb earnings volatility, and fund capital investments internally underpins the Company’s adequate financial strength and balance sheet resilience.


Governance
Board Structure

The Board of Directors (“BoD”) comprises three executive members, led by Mr. Babar Jahangir (Chairman & CEO), alongside Mr. Ahmad Jahangir and Mr. Fahad Jahangir, both serving as Directors. The board structure reflects complete sponsor representation, enabling swift decision-making, strong strategic alignment, and execution efficiency. However, the absence of independent representation constrains board-level objectivity, governance depth, and institutional oversight. The inclusion of independent directors with relevant sectoral, financial, or governance expertise would meaningfully strengthen board effectiveness, policy oversight, and risk governance, particularly as the Company continues to scale operations and complexity.


Members’ Profile

Mr. Babar Jahangir holds a UK-based graduate qualification and has been associated with BTPL for over eighteen years, leading the Company through its capacity expansion, product diversification, and operational transformation phases. His long-standing involvement ensures strategic continuity, technical depth, and execution discipline. Mr. Ahmad Jahangir and Mr. Fahad Jahangir, both graduates from reputed universities in the USA and the UK, respectively, have been serving as board members for the past four years. Their involvement has enhanced strategic bandwidth, financial oversight, and commercial direction, supporting the Company’s gradual shift toward higher value-added product segments and improved operational efficiency.


Board Effectiveness

The Board currently oversees two key committees:


Audit Committee: Responsible for oversight of financial reporting, statutory audit coordination, and internal control effectiveness. The Internal Audit function operates primarily under this committee, reinforcing compliance, financial discipline, and procedural consistency.


Corporate Performance & Evaluation Committee: Responsible for human resource policy formulation, succession planning for key management roles, and monitoring of organizational performance metrics, thereby strengthening talent continuity, leadership pipeline, and operational accountability.


The committee structure provides a basic yet functional governance framework; however, the formalization of broader board charters, enhanced performance monitoring dashboards, and risk oversight mechanisms could further elevate governance maturity and institutional robustness.


Financial Transparency

HASNAIN ALI Chartered Accountants (QCR rated) are the external auditors of the Company. The auditors have expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company’s financial statements for the year ended June 30, 2025, supporting adequate financial transparency, accounting discipline, and reporting integrity.


Management
Organizational Structure

BTPL operates under a lean yet functionally comprehensive organizational structure, designed to optimize communication efficiency, operational responsiveness, and decision velocity. Core functional departments include: Accounting, Finance, Human Resources, Technical, Operations, Procurement The Finance and Administration Managers report to the CFO, while the CFO, Marketing Manager, General Manager Production, and General Manager Auto Coro (Unit-2) report directly to the CEO. This reporting hierarchy ensures clear accountability, effective functional coordination, and centralized strategic oversight.


Management Team

The management profile is sponsor-led, supported by seasoned professionals with deep sectoral experience. Mr. Babar Jahangir (CEO) leads overall strategy, operational direction, and execution. Mr. Ahmad Jahangir (Director) oversees operations and finance-related functions, contributing to cost management, operational optimization, and financial discipline. Mr. Fahad Jahangir (Director – Commercial) heads commercial operations, driving market engagement, customer relationships, and pricing strategy. The professional management cadre is led by Mr. Abdul Basit (CFO), a Fellow Public Accountant (FPA) and Fellow Cost & Management Accountant (FCMA) with over 33 years of experience, including 19 years with BTPL. His long association ensures institutional memory, financial governance strength, and strategic continuity. Additionally, the General Manager Marketing, possessing nearly 30 years of textile industry experience, significantly strengthens market positioning, customer retention, and revenue stability.


Effectiveness

While the Company does not operate through formalized management committees, senior leadership conducts frequent structured meetings to deliberate on strategic priorities, production efficiency, operational bottlenecks, and financial performance. This hands-on management approach supports high operational responsiveness, swift corrective action, and tight performance monitoring.


MIS

The Company has established a multi-layered Management Information System (MIS) framework. Daily operational dashboards are generated for senior management, enabling real-time monitoring of production efficiency, inventory flows, and dispatch cycles. In parallel, comprehensive monthly MIS packs provide financial, operational, and performance analytics, supporting strategic planning, cost control, and informed decision-making. The Company maintains an adequate IT backbone, utilizing licensed QuickBooks Accounting Edition since 2016 for approximately 10 corporate users, covering core modules including:


- Accounts Payable

- Accounts Receivable

- Inventory Management

- Procurement

- Order Management

- General Ledger

- Fixed Assets

- Cash Management


While the system provides functional coverage and operational support, the implementation of a fully integrated ERP platform remains critical to enhance data integrity, real-time visibility, internal control depth, and scalability, particularly in view of rising operational complexity and scale.


Control Environment

BTPL maintains an adequate control environment, supported by centralized networking architecture, role-based access controls, and structured data management protocols. Dedicated servers ensure data integrity, system continuity, and reliable backup mechanisms. The Audit Committee, supported by the Internal Audit Department, plays a pivotal role in reinforcing governance discipline, procedural compliance, and operational efficiency. The internal audit function conducts regular operational and financial reviews, with reports submitted directly to the Board of Directors, thereby enhancing transparency, accountability, and internal control effectiveness. Notwithstanding existing controls, the formal deployment of a comprehensive ERP system remains a critical enhancement area, essential for strengthening end-to-end process controls, minimizing manual interventions, and improving institutional risk management.


Business Risk
Industry Dynamics

Pakistan’s textile exports improved during FY25, supported by gradual normalization in global demand and easing domestic financial conditions. Sector exports increased to USD ~17.3bln in FY25 (FY24: USD 16.7bln), reflecting a recovery led primarily by value-added segments, including garments and home textiles, while the spinning segment continued to operate under a highly competitive and margin-sensitive environment. Despite the improvement in export volumes, the operating landscape remained structurally constrained by elevated energy tariffs and the full-year impact of the Normal Tax Regime (NTR), which has materially altered post-tax profitability for export-oriented units. The imposition of corporate income tax and super tax under NTR has continued to compress net margins, particularly for low- to mid-tier spinning entities with limited pricing power and scale efficiencies. However, the progressive decline in policy rates during FY25 provided partial relief to financing costs, improving cash-flow dynamics and offering some cushion to debt-servicing metrics across the sector. In parallel, energy efficiency initiatives, particularly solarization, have emerged as a key structural differentiator, enabling relatively stronger cost positioning and margin resilience for companies with early investments in renewable energy. At the global level, evolving trade policies, shifting tariff regimes, and ongoing realignment of supply chains are expected to reshape competitive dynamics within major textile markets, particularly Europe and North America. These developments introduce both risks and selective opportunities for Pakistani exporters. While heightened competition and regulatory compliance requirements may intensify pressure on conventional suppliers, efficient spinning units aligned with quality, traceability, and sustainability standards stand to benefit from supply-chain diversification and buyer risk rebalancing. Overall, industry conditions during FY25 reflected a gradual shift toward stabilization, with future performance increasingly dependent on product mix optimization, export orientation, energy efficiency, regulatory adaptability, and financial discipline.


Relative Position

BTPL operates as a mid-sized dedicated spinning unit, with an installed capacity of ~60,156 spindles and an estimated annual production of ~11.33mln kgs of yarn, positioning it in the low-to-mid tier segment of the spinning industry. While scale constraints limit procurement leverage and pricing flexibility, the Company benefits from product specialization in viscose yarn, disciplined cost controls, and a structurally strong working capital framework, partially offsetting competitive pressures.


Revenues

During FY25, the Company reported net sales of PKR 4.06bln, reflecting a material contraction of 30.7% YoY (FY24: PKR 5.86bln). The decline was strategic rather than demand-driven, emanating from management’s deliberate shift toward finer yarn counts, including 40s, 52s, and 60s, aimed at enhancing margin quality and product positioning. This strategic transition resulted in longer production cycles, lower daily output, and elevated energy intensity, temporarily compressing volumetric throughput. Additionally, as an indirect exporter, the Company’s demand profile remains closely linked to downstream exporters, whose order flows remained subdued during FY25. Encouragingly, operational normalization is underway, with 1HFY26 revenues rebounding to PKR 2.68bln, reflecting improved capacity utilization, stabilizing energy availability, and gradual downstream demand recovery. Management expects FY26 topline to surpass PKR 5.0bln, supported by normalized production cycles and enhanced energy efficiency.


Margins

Profitability remained thin yet resilient, consistent with sector dynamics characterized by elevated energy costs, cotton price volatility, and full-year impact of NTR taxation. During FY25, gross profit stood at PKR 290mln, translating into a gross margin of 7.1%, while net profit amounted to PKR 37mln, corresponding to a net margin of 0.9%. During 1HFY26, margins moderated temporarily (gross margin: 5.7%; net margin: 1.1%), primarily due to pricing pressures, cost absorption lag, and inventory realignment linked to product mix optimization. However, the evolving product strategy, combined with energy cost rationalization through solarization, is expected to stabilize margin performance over the near-to-medium term.


Sustainability

A key structural strength of BTPL is its proactive energy efficiency strategy. The Company has successfully commissioned a 2.1 MW solar power plant and completed installation of an additional ~1.2 MW, raising total solar capacity to ~3.3 MW, against a total sanctioned load of ~5.9 MW. Notably, the entire investment has been funded through internal cash flows, without reliance on bank financing. This initiative materially lowers exposure to grid tariffs, improves cost visibility, and structurally enhances margin sustainability, positioning the Company more favorably within an energy-intensive operating environment.


Financial Risk
Working capital

The Company maintains a tight and structurally efficient working capital framework, anchored in advance-based sales arrangements and nil trade receivables, materially compressing cash conversion cycles and limiting counterparty risk. During FY25, net working capital days increased to 98 days (FY24: 65 days), driven primarily by inventory accumulation linked to finer yarn production, which extended production cycles. However, working capital efficiency improved significantly in 1HFY26, with net working capital days declining to 67 days, supported by inventory rationalization and improved sales momentum. The Company’s current ratio strengthened to 5.2x in 1HFY26 (FY25: 2.3x), reflecting enhanced liquidity buffers and balance sheet flexibility. Working capital requirements continue to be predominantly met through short-term borrowings, which remain adequately managed and aligned with operational cycles.


Coverages

Cashflow generation remains adequate but is sensitive to margin volatility and working capital movements. During FY25, FCFO stood at PKR 331 mln. In 1HFY26, FCFO amounted to PKR 62 mln, reflecting a slower pace of cash generation relative to the prior year, primarily due to lower profitability and inventory adjustments during the period. Consequently, interest coverage moderated to 1.0x in 1HFY26 (FY25: 2.8x), while operating cash flow coverage also softened to 1.0x (FY25: 2.2x). Although short-term coverage metrics appear compressed, expected energy cost savings from solarization and the gradual normalization of operations are anticipated to restore coverage ratios to more comfortable levels over the medium term.


Capitalization

The Company maintains a moderately leveraged capital structure, underpinned by progressive deleveraging and disciplined balance sheet management. Total borrowings declined to PKR 774mln in FY25 (FY24: PKR 1,271mln), resulting in improved leverage of 34.5% (FY24: 46.9%). During 1HFY26, borrowings increased moderately to PKR 959mln, reflecting seasonal working capital build-up, while leverage remained contained at 39.0%. The Company’s equity base strengthened to PKR 1,499mln in 1HFY26, supported by internally generated retained earnings, with no reliance on revaluation surplus, reflecting high-quality capitalization. Management remains committed to maintaining prudent leverage thresholds, with future expansion primarily targeted to be funded through internal cash generation, preserving financial flexibility and rating headroom.


 
 

Feb-26

www.pacra.com


(PKR mln)


Dec-25
6M
Jun-25
12M
Jun-24
12M
Jun-23
12M
A. BALANCE SHEET
1. Non-Current Assets 1,406 1,506 1,538 1,661
2. Investments 0 0 0 0
3. Related Party Exposure 0 0 0 0
4. Current Assets 1,501 1,571 1,627 1,340
a. Inventories 1,023 1,196 1,217 1,009
b. Trade Receivables 0 0 0 0
5. Total Assets 2,907 3,077 3,165 3,001
6. Current Liabilities 287 672 453 611
a. Trade Payables 80 185 57 73
7. Borrowings 959 774 1,271 996
8. Related Party Exposure 0 0 0 0
9. Non-Current Liabilities 2 5 3 7
10. Net Assets 1,659 1,627 1,438 1,388
11. Shareholders' Equity 1,499 1,470 1,438 1,388
B. INCOME STATEMENT
1. Sales 2,679 4,059 5,860 5,524
a. Cost of Good Sold (2,525) (3,769) (5,447) (5,094)
2. Gross Profit 153 290 413 430
a. Operating Expenses (27) (52) (53) (48)
3. Operating Profit 127 238 360 382
a. Non Operating Income or (Expense) 0 0 (8) (10)
4. Profit or (Loss) before Interest and Tax 127 238 352 372
a. Total Finance Cost (64) (150) (232) (202)
b. Taxation (33) (51) (73) (68)
6. Net Income Or (Loss) 29 37 46 102
C. CASH FLOW STATEMENT
a. Free Cash Flows from Operations (FCFO) 62 331 511 547
b. Net Cash from Operating Activities before Working Capital Changes 62 164 293 347
c. Changes in Working Capital 0 362 (477) 277
1. Net Cash provided by Operating Activities 62 525 (185) 624
2. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Investing Activities 0 (142) (103) (76)
3. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Financing Activities 0 (367) 275 (573)
4. Net Cash generated or (Used) during the period 62 17 (13) (25)
D. RATIO ANALYSIS
1. Performance
a. Sales Growth (for the period) 32.0% -30.7% 6.1% 18.7%
b. Gross Profit Margin 5.7% 7.1% 7.1% 7.8%
c. Net Profit Margin 1.1% 0.9% 0.8% 1.8%
d. Cash Conversion Efficiency (FCFO adjusted for Working Capital/Sales) 2.3% 17.1% 0.6% 14.9%
e. Return on Equity [ Net Profit Margin * Asset Turnover * (Total Assets/Shareholders' Equity )] 3.9% 2.5% 3.3% 7.7%
2. Working Capital Management
a. Gross Working Capital (Average Days) 76 109 69 78
b. Net Working Capital (Average Days) 67 98 65 72
c. Current Ratio (Current Assets / Current Liabilities) 5.2 2.3 3.6 2.2
3. Coverages
a. EBITDA / Finance Cost 1.0 2.8 2.6 3.0
b. FCFO / Finance Cost+CMLTB+Excess STB 1.0 2.2 1.3 1.6
c. Debt Payback (Total Borrowings+Excess STB) / (FCFO-Finance Cost) -50.9 1.0 1.1 1.4
4. Capital Structure
a. Total Borrowings / (Total Borrowings+Shareholders' Equity) 39.0% 34.5% 46.9% 41.8%
b. Interest or Markup Payable (Days) 0.0 0.0 60.4 46.8
c. Entity Average Borrowing Rate 13.8% 17.9% 19.9% 14.8%

Feb-26

www.pacra.com

Feb-26

www.pacra.com

  1. Rating Team Statements
    1. Rating is just an opinion about the creditworthiness of the entity and does not constitute a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell any security of the entity rated or to buy, hold, or sell the security rated, as the case may be. (Chapter III; 14-3-(x))
    2. Conflict of Interest
      1. The Rating Team or any of their family members have no interest in this rating (Chapter III; 12-2-(j))
      2. PACRA, the analysts involved in the rating process, and members of its rating committee and their family members do not have any conflict of interest relating to the rating done by them (Chapter III; 12-2-(e) & (k))
      3. The analyst is not a substantial shareholder of the customer being rated by PACRA [Annexure F; d-(ii)]
      4. Explanation: for the purpose of the above clause, the term "family members" shall include only those family members who are dependent on the analyst and members of the rating committee.
  2. Restrictions
    1. No director, officer, or employee of PACRA communicates the information acquired by him for use for rating purposes to any other person, except where required under law to do so. (Chapter III; 10-(5))
    2. PACRA does not disclose or discuss with outside parties or make improper use of the non-public information which has come to its knowledge during a business relationship with the customer. (Chapter III; 10-7-(d))
    3. PACRA does not make proposals or recommendations regarding the activities of rated entities that could impact a credit rating of the entity subject to rating. (Chapter III; 10-7-(k))
  3. Conduct of Business
    1. PACRA fulfills its obligations in a fair, efficient, transparent, and ethical manner and renders high standards of services in performing its functions and obligations. (Chapter III; 11-A-(a))
    2. PACRA uses due care in the preparation of this Rating Report. Our information has been obtained from sources we consider to be reliable, but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. PACRA does not, in every instance, independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing this Rating Report. (Clause 11-(A)(p))
    3. PACRA prohibits its employees and analysts from soliciting money, gifts, or favors from anyone with whom PACRA conducts business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(q))
    4. PACRA ensures before the commencement of the rating process that an analyst or employee has not had a recent employment or other significant business or personal relationship with the rated entity that may cause or may be perceived as causing a conflict of interest. (Chapter III; 11-A-(r))
    5. PACRA maintains the principle of integrity in seeking rating business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(u))
    6. PACRA promptly investigates in the event of misconduct or a breach of the policies, procedures, and controls, and takes appropriate steps to rectify any weaknesses to prevent any recurrence, along with suitable punitive action against the responsible employee(s). (Chapter III; 11-B-(m))
  4. Independence & Conflict of Interest
    1. PACRA receives compensation from the entity being rated or any third party for the rating services it offers. The receipt of this compensation has no influence on PACRA’s opinions or other analytical processes. In all instances, PACRA is committed to preserving the objectivity, integrity, and independence of its ratings. Our relationship is governed by two distinct mandates: i) rating mandate - signed with the entity being rated or issuer of the debt instrument, and ii) fee mandate - signed with the payer, which can be different from the entity.
    2. PACRA does not provide consultancy/advisory services or other services to any of its customers or their associated companies and associated undertakings that are being rated or have been rated by it during the preceding three years, unless it has an adequate mechanism in place ensuring that the provision of such services does not lead to a conflict of interest situation with its rating activities. (Chapter III; 12-2-(d))
    3. PACRA discloses that no shareholder directly or indirectly holding 10% or more of the share capital of PACRA also holds directly or indirectly 10% or more of the share capital of the entity which is subject to rating or the entity which issued the instrument subject to rating by PACRA. (Chapter III; 12-2-(f))
    4. PACRA ensures that the rating assigned to an entity or instrument is not affected by the existence of a business relationship between PACRA and the entity or any other party, or the non-existence of such a relationship. (Chapter III; 12-2-(i))
    5. PACRA ensures that the analysts or any of their family members shall not buy, sell, or engage in any transaction in any security which falls in the analyst’s area of primary analytical responsibility. This clause, however, does not apply to investments in securities through collective investment schemes. (Chapter III; 12-2-(l))
    6. PACRA has established policies and procedures governing investments and trading in securities by its employees and for monitoring the same to prevent insider trading, market manipulation, or any other market abuse. (Chapter III; 11-B-(g))
  5. Monitoring and Review
    1. PACRA monitors all the outstanding ratings continuously, and any potential change therein due to any event associated with the issuer, the security arrangement, the industry, etc., is disseminated to the market immediately and in an effective manner after appropriate consultation with the entity/issuer. (Chapter III; 17-(a))
    2. PACRA reviews all the outstanding ratings periodically on an annual basis. Provided that public dissemination of annual review and in an instance of change in rating will be made. (Chapter III; 17-(b))
    3. PACRA initiates an immediate review of the outstanding rating upon becoming aware of any information that may reasonably be expected to result in downgrading of the rating. (Chapter III; 17-(c))
    4. PACRA engages with the issuer and the debt securities trustee to remain updated on all information pertaining to the rating of the entity/instrument. (Chapter III; 17-(d))
  6. Probability of Default
    1. PACRA’s Rating Scale reflects the expectation of credit risk. The highest rating has the lowest relative likelihood of default (i.e., probability). PACRA’s transition studies capture the historical performance behavior of a specific rating notch. Transition behavior of the assigned rating can be obtained from PACRA’s Transition Study available at our website. (www.pacra.com) However, the actual transition of rating may not follow the pattern observed in the past. (Chapter III; 14-3(f)(vii))
  7. Proprietary Information
    1. All information contained herein is considered proprietary by PACRA. Hence, none of the information in this document can be copied or otherwise reproduced, stored, or disseminated in whole or in part in any form or by any means whatsoever by any person without PACRA’s prior written consent.

Feb-26

www.pacra.com