Rating History
Dissemination Date Long-Term Rating Short-Term Rating Outlook Action Rating Watch
27-Feb-26 A- A2 Stable Maintain -
28-Feb-25 A- A2 Stable Maintain -
01-Mar-24 A- A2 Stable Maintain -
02-Mar-23 A- A2 Stable Initial -
About the Entity

Poly Pack (Pvt.) Limited was founded as a private limited Company in 1991 and began its operations with the commercial production of Poly Propylene Bags. The Company’s manufacturing plant is located near Raiwind. The Company is wholly owned by the sponsor family with major ownership of ~43.6% residing with Mr. Iftikhar Ahmed, followed by Mr. Aamir, Mr. Bilal, and Mr. Abdullah owns ~15.6% shares respectively while Mrs. Nazia Iftikhar owns ~9.4% shares.

Rating Rationale

The assigned ratings reflect Poly Pack (Pvt.) Limited's (or the “Company”) stable market position, an experienced management team and a strong customer profile. It is entirely family-owned, with sponsors possessing extensive expertise in packaging, having been active in the industry since 1991. The Company’s core business revolves around the production of polypropylene woven bags, complemented by a diversified portfolio that includes polyethylene plain films, polyethylene shrink films, POF shrink films, and flexible packaging products. The raw material of the finished product is mainly imported, hence exposed to exchange rate risk. The demand for the product is derived from various industries including textile, sugar, fertilizer, chemical, edible ghee/oil, beverages and confectionery/FMCG. Pakistan’s paper and packaging industry has faced margin pressures due to rising energy costs and inflationary impact, which increased the cost of sales and impacted profit margins. Despite these challenges, demand for packaging from the FMCG and food sectors is expected to sustain moderate production growth, with the industry outlook remaining stable, supported by sustainability initiatives and recycling trends. Despite economic headwinds, Poly Pack (Pvt.) Limited preserved its market share by prioritizing quality and customer retention, ensuring stability. The Company has an annual production capacity of 60,000 MT, with utilization rising to 89% in FY25 from 74% in FY24. As per management representation, the Company has captured the major share of the PP Woven Bags market. Almost 60% of the Company's total sales are made in the Punjab region in FY25. The Company has installed a BOPP plant of 50,000 MT with an approximate cost of USD 60mln in the Special Economic Zone, Sheikhupura. It is operated as an associated Company of Poly Pack (Pvt.) Limited, named “Poly Pack Films (Pvt.) Limited”. This project features a backward integration model, reserving 10%-15% for in-house use while supplying the remainder to external markets. The project achieved its commercial operations date (COD) in Jan'26. The Company intends to establish a CPP plant within the premises of Poly Pack Films (Pvt.) Limited as part of its ongoing efforts to further diversify its product portfolio.
On the financial profile side, Poly Pack (Pvt.) Limited achieved an increase in topline of 19% and stood at PKR 18,445mln in FY25 (FY24: PKR 15,504mln) driven primarily by higher sales volumes. It stood at PKR 8,473mln at the end of 6MFY26. PP woven bags continue to be the leading revenue contributor, accounting for ~50%. The gross profit margin declined from 7.2% in FY24 to 5.1% in FY25, due to high cost of sales primarily driven by increased raw material consumption. In 6MFY26, it stood at 5%. The bottom-line of the Company clocked in at ~PKR 585mln during FY25 (FY24: PKR 775mln) driven by a reduction in gross profit and other income. Whereas, at the end of 6MFY26, it amounted to PKR 151mln. The Company maintained a low leverage profile which is recorded at 6.8% (FY24: 5.2%), reflecting less reliance on debt to support ongoing capacity expansions. However, by the end of 6MFY26, leverage increased to 16.3%, primarily attributable to a rise in short-term borrowings to manage working capital requirements and business expansion. Most of the Company's leverage is of the non-funded nature. The Company has extended a corporate guarantee of PKR 6bln on behalf of the wholly owned subsidiary. Additionally, it has availed itself of the non-funded lines from banks. The equity of the Company stood at PKR 5,499mln as of 6MFY26 (FY25: PKR 5,495mln).

Key Rating Drivers

The ratings are dependent upon the management’s ability to improve margins while sustaining its market share. Prudent management of the working capital and maintaining sufficient cash flows and coverages are essential for the ratings. Any significant change in margins and coverages will impact the ratings.

Profile
Legal Structure

Poly Pack (Pvt.) Limited (or the "Company") was incorporated as a private limited Company in 1991.


Background

The Company has begun its operations with the commercial production of polypropylene woven bags. The main sponsor family has utilized his skills and experience to turn Poly Pack (Pvt.) Limited to a competent contender in the PP woven bags.


Operations

Poly Pack (Pvt.) Limited provides different types of Poly Propylene Woven Bags, Polyethylene Plain Films, Polyethylene Shrink films, POF Shrink Films. In addition, the Company has established a dedicated flexible packaging line, enabling in-house printing and customized packaging solutions for large-scale corporate clients. The Company maintains a strong and diversified customer portfolio, serving reputable clients across multiple industries, including textile, sugar, fertilizer, chemicals, edible ghee/oil, beverages, and confectionery/FMCG sectors. The Company has expanded their capacity year by year, from ~34,600 MT/annum to ~60,000 MT/annum tons, with a utilized capacity of 53,147 MT/annum (89%) in FY25.



Ownership
Ownership Structure

Majority stake of Poly Pack (Pvt.) Limited lies with Mr. Iftikhar Ahmed who owns ~43.6% of the total shares. Mr. Aamir, Mr. Bilal, and Mr. Abdullah hold respectively ~15.6% ownership of the Company. Mr. Aamir, Mr. Bilal, and Mr. Abdullah are all brothers, with Mr. Aamir being the eldest, followed by Mr. Bilal and Mr. Abdullah. Mrs. Nazia Iftikhar, wife of Mr. Iftikhar Ahmed, holds 9.42%  stake in Poly Pack (Pvt) Limited.


Stability

The ownership structure remains stable, supported by sponsors who possess extensive experience in the packaging industry and maintain a significant personal stake in the business. The equity injections of PKR 617 million in FY23 and PKR 228 million in FY24 reflect the sponsors’ strong commitment to the Company’s growth and long-term sustainability. Furthermore, their strategic intent to maintain a low-leverage capital structure helps contain financial risk and strengthens the Company’s overall financial stability.


Business Acumen

The sponsors and directors of Poly Pack (Pvt.) Limited bring extensive experience and in-depth industry knowledge, supported by their longstanding family association with the packaging sector. The Company is collectively managed by three brothers under the strategic guidance of their father. Within the management structure, Mr. Bilal oversees finance, taxation, and related compliance matters, while Mr. Aamir and Mr. Abdullah are responsible for supervising and managing the Company’s operational functions.


Financial Strength

The financial strength of the sponsors is sufficient to support the Company in the times of crises. The family has significant resources to finance the Company if the need arises.


Governance
Board Structure

The composition of the Company’s Board of Directors (BoD) is centered around members of the sponsoring family, reflecting a closely held governance structure.There are four directors on the Board, all of them are executive. The addition of independent director would be encouraged.


Members’ Profile

All the Board members are businessmen in the profession and have the relevant skills. Mr. Iftikhar Ahmed - Executive Director also serves as Chief executive Officer of the Company. brings over 47 years of extensive business experience. Under his leadership, the Company has established a stable operational foundation and sustained strategic direction. His long-standing industry exposure enables informed decision-making, corporate governance oversight, and business expansion initiatives. Mr. Aamir Iftikhar - Executive Director holds a Bachelor of Honours degree from the UK and has ~16 years of business experience. He contributes to strategic planning, operational management, and commercial development. His international academic background complements his practical exposure in business operations, enabling him to support growth initiatives and organizational strengthening. Mr. Bilal Iftikhar - Executive Director is an ACCA (UK) qualified professional with around 15 years of experience in business management. Since joining the Board in 2010, he has played a key role in financial oversight, governance compliance, and performance monitoring. Mr. Muhammad Abdullah holds a Bachelor of Honours degree from Canada and possesses approximately 10 years of business experience. He contributes to operational coordination and business development activities. His academic exposure combined with practical involvement strengthens the Company’s management perspective and supports implementation of strategic objectives.


Board Effectiveness

The Board has the strength of all members belonging to the same family, increasing their cohesiveness. The Board met four times during FY25, with the majority attending to discuss matters.


Financial Transparency

M/s PKF F.R.A.N.T.S. are the external auditors of the Company. They have expressed an unqualified opinion on the financial reports for FY25. The firm is QCR rated by ICAP and is in the "B" Category of SBP’s panel of auditors.


Management
Organizational Structure

Poly Pack (Pvt.) Limited has developed a defined organizational structure keeping in mind the Company’s operational needs. The Company operates through Procurement, Sales and Marketing, Finance and Accounting, production and Technical department and Administration Departments.


Management Team

The Company’s management team comprises seasoned professionals with long-standing association and a deep-rooted understanding of the business. The Company’s General Manager (Production), Mr. Mushtaq Anjum Chaudhary has been associated with the Company since its inception. Mr. Mushtaq Anjum Chaudhary has over 48 years of relevant experience and also has special expertise in Polymer/Polyolefins. The Company’s Manager Finance, Mr. Aamir Manzoor, is a CA finalist and has over 30 years of relevant experience. He has been working with the Company for 24 years.


Effectiveness

The experience of the sponsors along with a professional management team has helped the Company to streamline its operations. However, Management’s effectiveness and efficiency can be ensured through the presence of management committees. At Poly Pack (Pvt.) Limited, absence of management committees are indicating the room for improvement.


MIS

The SAP S/4HANA ERP system has been successfully implemented and is fully operational across the organization. It is being utilized to generate timely and accurate MIS and operational reports, enabling improved data visibility, streamlined processes, better decision-making, and enhanced overall operational efficiency. 


Control Environment

The Company has developed an effective mechanism for identification, assessment, and reporting of all types of risk arising out of the business operations because there is an internal audit department in place to ensure operational efficiency which operates under the direct supervision of directors.


Business Risk
Industry Dynamics

Pakistan’s packaging industry consists of four major segments: paper, plastic, tinplate, and glass. Paper and plastic segments occupy the major share of total market. Poly Pack (Pvt.) Limited operates under the plastic segment of the Industry. The demand of the plastic segment is directly correlated with cement, food & consumer products. The Company’s direct costs consist largely of imported raw materials. A major challenge faced by the sector is prices and availability of raw materials specifically polymers such as polypropylene & polyethene (PP) resin. Resin prices are largely a function of global crude oil prices, demand-supply dynamics, and exchange rate volatility. Any volatility in the oil prices and exchange rates is, therefore, a significant source of risk for this segment. However, Pakistan’s paper and packaging industry also faced margin pressures due to rising energy costs, which increased the cost of sales and impacted profit margins. Despite these challenges, demand for packaging from the FMCG and food sectors is expected to sustain moderate production growth, with the industry outlook remaining stable, supported by sustainability initiatives and recycling trends. This has encouraged Companies to explore alternative energy solutions, including solar power, to mitigate the challenge and improve cost efficiency.



Relative Position

As represented by management, the Company has captured the major share of the PP Woven Bags market. Almost 60% of the Company's total sales are made in the Punjab region in FY25. Poly pack (Pvt.) Limited is also becoming a well-known name in the PP films.


Revenues

Poly Pack (Pvt.) Limited achieved an increase in topline of 19% and stood at PKR 18,445mln in FY25 (FY24: PKR 15,504mln) driven primarily by higher sales volumes. It stood at PKR 8,473mln at the end of 6MFY26. PP woven bags continue to be the leading revenue contributor, accounting for ~50%. followed by PE Shrink films of 37%. The Company generates revenue from the sale of  poly propylene woven bags, poly ethylene films and flexible packaging in the local market.


Margins

Raw materials being used for manufacturing Poly Propylene Woven Bags and flexible packaging are imported. So, to maintain the margins, the Company passes on the cost to B2B consumers. In FY25, gross margin and operating profit margin both decreased as compared to FY23. The gross profit margin declined from 7.2% in FY24 to 5.1% in FY25, due to high cost of sales primarily driven by increased raw material consumption. In 6MFY26, it stood at 5%. Whereas, operating profit margin decreased from ~5.9% to ~3.9% whereas in 6MFY26, it stood at 3.7%. Consequently, the net profit margin also decreased from ~5.0% to ~3.2% during the same period whereas in 6MFY26, it stood at 1.8%. The bottom-line of the Company clocked in at ~PKR 585mln during FY25 (FY24: PKR 775mln) driven by a reduction in gross profit and other income. Whereas, at the end of 6MFY26, it amounted to PKR 151mln.



Sustainability

In recent years, the Company has undergone through significant expansion while further capital is injected for the planned expansion. The Company has installed a BOPP plant titled as "Poly Pack Film (Pvt.) Limited" in Sheikhupura which will improve the operational efficiency of the Company and also will help to maintain a better position in the market. The Poly Pack Film (Pvt.) Limited is operated as associated Company of Poly Pack (Pvt) Limited. The project achieved its commercial operations date (COD) in Jan'26, with the installed capacity of 50,000 metric tonnes annually with approx. cost of  USD 60mln. The Company also intends to establish a CPP plant within the premises of Poly Pack Films (Pvt.) Limited as part of its ongoing efforts to further diversify its product portfolio.



Financial Risk
Working capital

The Company’s working capital requirements are a function of its inventory, trade receivables, and trade payables which are financed through borrowings and FCFO. Poly Pack (Pvt.) Limited experienced a rise in inventory days, increasing from ~49 days at end of FY24 to ~54 days at end of FY25 wheres it stood at 66 days at the end of 6MFY26. Meanwhile, trade receivable days recoreded a minor dip of ~2 days and stood at 23 days during the same period (FY24: 25 days) wheres it stood at 27 days at the end of 6MFY26. But the trade payable days increased from ~90 days at end FY24 to ~94 days at end FY25 wheres it stood at 104 days at the end of 6MFY26. Consequently, the Company’s net working capital days remained contant at (16) days at the end of FY25 wheres it stood at (11) days at the end of 6MFY26.


Coverages

During FY25, the Company’s FCFOs stood at ~PKR 355mln increasing from ~PKR 762mln in FY24 whereas it stood at PKR 108mln at the end of 6MFY26. During FY25, FCFO/Finance cost stood at ~ 14.0x increased from ~22.2x of coverage during FY24 due to a significant increase in FCFO. Whereas it stood at PKR 5.3x at the end of 6MFY26. The finance cost stood at ~PKR 40mln in FY25 decreased from ~PKR 44mln at the end of FY24 whereas it stood at PKR 27mln at the end of 6MFY26.


Capitalization

The Company has a low leveraged capital structure. Long-term debt is related to expansion activities, whereas short-term debt is related to working capital management. The Company maintained a low leverage profile which is recorded at 6.8% (FY24: 5.2%), reflecting less reliance on debt to support ongoing capacity expansions. However, by the end of 6MFY26, leverage increased to 16.3%, primarily attributable to a rise in short-term borrowings to manage working capital requirements and business expansion. At the end of FY25, the long-term borrowing has increased to ~PKR 400mln from ~PKR 235mln at the end of FY24 whereas it stood at PKR 1,073mln at the end of 6MFY26. Whereas, the equity of the Company stood at PKR 5,499mln as of 6MFY26 (FY25: PKR 5,495mln).



 
 

Feb-26

www.pacra.com


(PKR mln)


Dec-25
6M
Jun-25
12M
Jun-24
12M
Jun-23
12M
Management Audited Audited Audited
A. BALANCE SHEET
1. Non-Current Assets 4,465 4,519 4,483 1,442
2. Investments 50 50 50 0
3. Related Party Exposure 771 449 300 2,490
4. Current Assets 6,399 6,295 5,093 3,741
a. Inventories 3,128 2,984 2,477 1,649
b. Trade Receivables 1,294 1,254 1,087 1,001
5. Total Assets 11,684 11,314 9,925 7,674
6. Current Liabilities 5,055 5,357 4,707 3,401
a. Trade Payables 4,655 5,013 4,450 3,160
7. Borrowings 1,073 400 235 287
8. Related Party Exposure 0 0 34 37
9. Non-Current Liabilities 56 61 45 48
10. Net Assets 5,500 5,495 4,905 3,901
11. Shareholders' Equity 5,500 5,495 4,905 3,901
B. INCOME STATEMENT
1. Sales 8,473 18,445 15,503 15,077
a. Cost of Good Sold (8,046) (17,501) (14,391) (13,795)
2. Gross Profit 427 944 1,113 1,282
a. Operating Expenses (114) (225) (197) (192)
3. Operating Profit 313 719 916 1,091
a. Non Operating Income or (Expense) (17) (38) (40) (48)
4. Profit or (Loss) before Interest and Tax 296 681 876 1,042
a. Total Finance Cost (27) (40) (44) (178)
b. Taxation (117) (56) (57) (93)
6. Net Income Or (Loss) 152 585 775 771
C. CASH FLOW STATEMENT
a. Free Cash Flows from Operations (FCFO) 108 355 762 911
b. Net Cash from Operating Activities before Working Capital Changes 93 317 722 735
c. Changes in Working Capital (976) (382) (223) (971)
1. Net Cash provided by Operating Activities (883) (66) 500 (235)
2. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Investing Activities 3 (88) (688) (285)
3. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Financing Activities 844 181 173 533
4. Net Cash generated or (Used) during the period (35) 27 (15) 13
D. RATIO ANALYSIS
1. Performance
a. Sales Growth (for the period) -8.1% 19.0% 2.8% 0.0%
b. Gross Profit Margin 5.0% 5.1% 7.2% 8.5%
c. Net Profit Margin 1.8% 3.2% 5.0% 5.1%
d. Cash Conversion Efficiency (FCFO adjusted for Working Capital/Sales) -10.2% -0.2% 3.5% -0.4%
e. Return on Equity [ Net Profit Margin * Asset Turnover * (Total Assets/Shareholders' Equity )] 5.5% 11.2% 17.6% 19.8%
2. Working Capital Management
a. Gross Working Capital (Average Days) 93 77 73 64
b. Net Working Capital (Average Days) -11 -16 -16 -12
c. Current Ratio (Current Assets / Current Liabilities) 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.1
3. Coverages
a. EBITDA / Finance Cost 17.9 33.9 30.3 26.8
b. FCFO / Finance Cost+CMLTB+Excess STB 2.8 3.9 6.0 6.6
c. Debt Payback (Total Borrowings+Excess STB) / (FCFO-Finance Cost) 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4
4. Capital Structure
a. Total Borrowings / (Total Borrowings+Shareholders' Equity) 16.3% 6.8% 5.2% 7.7%
b. Interest or Markup Payable (Days) 146.9 88.2 78.7 61.3
c. Entity Average Borrowing Rate 7.5% 9.3% 12.2% 14.3%

Feb-26

www.pacra.com

Feb-26

www.pacra.com

  1. Rating Team Statements
    1. Rating is just an opinion about the creditworthiness of the entity and does not constitute a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell any security of the entity rated or to buy, hold, or sell the security rated, as the case may be. (Chapter III; 14-3-(x))
    2. Conflict of Interest
      1. The Rating Team or any of their family members have no interest in this rating (Chapter III; 12-2-(j))
      2. PACRA, the analysts involved in the rating process, and members of its rating committee and their family members do not have any conflict of interest relating to the rating done by them (Chapter III; 12-2-(e) & (k))
      3. The analyst is not a substantial shareholder of the customer being rated by PACRA [Annexure F; d-(ii)]
      4. Explanation: for the purpose of the above clause, the term "family members" shall include only those family members who are dependent on the analyst and members of the rating committee.
  2. Restrictions
    1. No director, officer, or employee of PACRA communicates the information acquired by him for use for rating purposes to any other person, except where required under law to do so. (Chapter III; 10-(5))
    2. PACRA does not disclose or discuss with outside parties or make improper use of the non-public information which has come to its knowledge during a business relationship with the customer. (Chapter III; 10-7-(d))
    3. PACRA does not make proposals or recommendations regarding the activities of rated entities that could impact a credit rating of the entity subject to rating. (Chapter III; 10-7-(k))
  3. Conduct of Business
    1. PACRA fulfills its obligations in a fair, efficient, transparent, and ethical manner and renders high standards of services in performing its functions and obligations. (Chapter III; 11-A-(a))
    2. PACRA uses due care in the preparation of this Rating Report. Our information has been obtained from sources we consider to be reliable, but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. PACRA does not, in every instance, independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing this Rating Report. (Clause 11-(A)(p))
    3. PACRA prohibits its employees and analysts from soliciting money, gifts, or favors from anyone with whom PACRA conducts business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(q))
    4. PACRA ensures before the commencement of the rating process that an analyst or employee has not had a recent employment or other significant business or personal relationship with the rated entity that may cause or may be perceived as causing a conflict of interest. (Chapter III; 11-A-(r))
    5. PACRA maintains the principle of integrity in seeking rating business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(u))
    6. PACRA promptly investigates in the event of misconduct or a breach of the policies, procedures, and controls, and takes appropriate steps to rectify any weaknesses to prevent any recurrence, along with suitable punitive action against the responsible employee(s). (Chapter III; 11-B-(m))
  4. Independence & Conflict of Interest
    1. PACRA receives compensation from the entity being rated or any third party for the rating services it offers. The receipt of this compensation has no influence on PACRA’s opinions or other analytical processes. In all instances, PACRA is committed to preserving the objectivity, integrity, and independence of its ratings. Our relationship is governed by two distinct mandates: i) rating mandate - signed with the entity being rated or issuer of the debt instrument, and ii) fee mandate - signed with the payer, which can be different from the entity.
    2. PACRA does not provide consultancy/advisory services or other services to any of its customers or their associated companies and associated undertakings that are being rated or have been rated by it during the preceding three years, unless it has an adequate mechanism in place ensuring that the provision of such services does not lead to a conflict of interest situation with its rating activities. (Chapter III; 12-2-(d))
    3. PACRA discloses that no shareholder directly or indirectly holding 10% or more of the share capital of PACRA also holds directly or indirectly 10% or more of the share capital of the entity which is subject to rating or the entity which issued the instrument subject to rating by PACRA. (Chapter III; 12-2-(f))
    4. PACRA ensures that the rating assigned to an entity or instrument is not affected by the existence of a business relationship between PACRA and the entity or any other party, or the non-existence of such a relationship. (Chapter III; 12-2-(i))
    5. PACRA ensures that the analysts or any of their family members shall not buy, sell, or engage in any transaction in any security which falls in the analyst’s area of primary analytical responsibility. This clause, however, does not apply to investments in securities through collective investment schemes. (Chapter III; 12-2-(l))
    6. PACRA has established policies and procedures governing investments and trading in securities by its employees and for monitoring the same to prevent insider trading, market manipulation, or any other market abuse. (Chapter III; 11-B-(g))
  5. Monitoring and Review
    1. PACRA monitors all the outstanding ratings continuously, and any potential change therein due to any event associated with the issuer, the security arrangement, the industry, etc., is disseminated to the market immediately and in an effective manner after appropriate consultation with the entity/issuer. (Chapter III; 17-(a))
    2. PACRA reviews all the outstanding ratings periodically on an annual basis. Provided that public dissemination of annual review and in an instance of change in rating will be made. (Chapter III; 17-(b))
    3. PACRA initiates an immediate review of the outstanding rating upon becoming aware of any information that may reasonably be expected to result in downgrading of the rating. (Chapter III; 17-(c))
    4. PACRA engages with the issuer and the debt securities trustee to remain updated on all information pertaining to the rating of the entity/instrument. (Chapter III; 17-(d))
  6. Probability of Default
    1. PACRA’s Rating Scale reflects the expectation of credit risk. The highest rating has the lowest relative likelihood of default (i.e., probability). PACRA’s transition studies capture the historical performance behavior of a specific rating notch. Transition behavior of the assigned rating can be obtained from PACRA’s Transition Study available at our website. (www.pacra.com) However, the actual transition of rating may not follow the pattern observed in the past. (Chapter III; 14-3(f)(vii))
  7. Proprietary Information
    1. All information contained herein is considered proprietary by PACRA. Hence, none of the information in this document can be copied or otherwise reproduced, stored, or disseminated in whole or in part in any form or by any means whatsoever by any person without PACRA’s prior written consent.

Feb-26

www.pacra.com