Rating History
Dissemination Date Long-Term Rating Short-Term Rating Outlook Action Rating Watch
13-Feb-26 A A1 Stable Maintain -
14-Feb-25 A A1 Stable Maintain -
16-Feb-24 A A1 Stable Maintain -
17-Feb-23 A A1 Stable Maintain -
17-Feb-22 A A1 Stable Maintain -
About the Entity

Nishat Packaging Ltd was incorporated as a Public Limited Company in 2004. D.G. Khan Cement Company Ltd. (DGKCC) and Shuaiba entered into an agreement on 12th June 2004 for setting up a paper sack plant in Pakistan, but later in June 2008, Nishat acquired the stake from Shuaiba Paper. Now NPL is a backward integration of D.G. Khan Cement Company Ltd. DG Khan cement is the major shareholder with 55% holding, Nishat Mills Ltd holds 25% shares, while the remaining 20% shareholding lies with Mansha Family. Mr. Mian Raza Mansha is the CEO and Chairperson of the Company. He has more than 26 years diversified professional experience in various business sectors. He is associated by an able team.

Rating Rationale

The assigned ratings reflect Nishat Packaging Limited’s (“NPL” or the “Company”) strong sponsor profile, an experienced management team, satisfactory market position and adequate customer profile. The Company specializes in the conversion and manufacturing of paper and polypropylene (PP) bags for the cement industry, hence demand closely tied to cement dispatches. Pakistan’s cement industry is showing clear signs of recovery after a prolonged slowdown, supported by stabilization under the IMF program. Cement industry demand has strengthened, with overall dispatches rising notably in the first quarter of FY26. Domestic sales increased by 17% due to revived private construction activity, improved project execution, and gradually returning consumer confidence. Exports grew by 21%, driven by stronger sea-based shipments and higher dispatches to Afghanistan, though border tensions pose a risk. Looking ahead, FY26 volumes are expected to reach 51–52 million tons, indicating steady progress toward recovery which will also improve the profitability of cement packaging companies. The raw material of the paper and PP bags is majorly imported, hence exposed to exchange rate risk. To manage exchange rate risk, the Company has built sufficient inventory to meet customer demand efficiently and cost-effectively. As of FY25, Nishat Packaging Limited has maintained an aggregate annual production capacity of 250mln bags, including 160mln paper bags and 90mln PP bags. During FY25, paper bag production was recorded at 42mln bags, translating into a capacity utilization of 26%, whereas PP bag production reached 50mln bags, reflecting a utilization level of 56%. Accordingly, the overall plant utilization remained at 37%. During FY25, the revenue of the Company increased due to the production of PP bags and stood at ~PKR 3.3bln (FY24: ~PKR 2.5bln). The Company’s revenue mix remained predominantly driven by paper bag sales, which accounted for more than 70% of the total revenue, while the remaining contribution was generated from polypropylene (PP) bags. The Company reported a net profit of PKR 510mln during FY25 (FY24: PKR -285mln), primarily attributable to an increase in revenue and gains realized from the sale of fixed assets. Moving forward, the Company aims to expand PP bag production, which will optimize utilization and stabilize profitability. Nishat Packaging Limited, benefits from economies of scale, supporting its rating. The Company has a leveraged capital structure, with long-term debt linked to expansion activities and short-term debt rising for working capital management. However, most receivables are from related parties, mitigating credit risk.

Key Rating Drivers

The ratings would remain dependent upon the Company’s ability to sustain its healthy business profile amidst strong competition, herein, effective and prudent management of financial risk indicators remains important. Moreover, upholding of governance framework is vital.

Profile
Legal Structure

Nishat Packaging Ltd ("NPL" or the "Company") is a Public Limited Company incorporated under the repealed Companies Ordinance 1984 (now Companies Act 2017), on 23 July, 2004.


Background

Nishat Packaging Limited was a joint venture project of Nishat with Shuaiba Paper Products Company Ltd. Kuwait (Shuaiba). The primary purpose of the project was to achieve vertical integration in the cement business by supplying paper sacks for cement packaging. D.G. Khan Cement Company Ltd. (DGKCC) and Shuaiba entered into an agreement on 12th June 2004 for setting up a paper sack plant in Pakistan, but later in June 2008, Nishat acquired the stake from Shuaiba Paper. Now, Nishat Packaging Limited is a backward integration of D.G. Khan Cement Company Ltd.



Operations

The Company operates in the conversion and production of paper and polypropylene (PP) packaging solutions, maintaining an aggregate annual production capacity of 250 million bags, including 160 million paper bags and 90 million PP bags. The Company’s paper manufacturing unit is located adjacent to the D.G. Khan Cement Kairpur facility in District Chakwal, offering operational efficiency through its close vicinity to prominent cement manufacturers. The PP manufacturing unit is established at the Quaid-e-Azam Business Park Industrial Estate, Sheikhupura, which supports streamlined industrial operations and supply chain accessibility.


Ownership
Ownership Structure

The shareholding structure of NPL is predominantly held by corporate sponsors, with DG Khan Cement holding a majority stake of 55%, followed by Nishat Mills Limited with 25%. The remaining shareholding is distributed among individual investors, including members of the Mansha family. Within the family shareholding, Mrs. Naz Mansha holds a 6% stake, while Mr. Umer Mansha and Mr. Hassan Mansha each hold 4% shareholding in the Company. Nishat Mills Ltd has 31% of shareholding in DG Khan Cement. Thus ultimate shareholding remained with Nishat Group.


Stability

Founded by Mian Muhammad Mansha, Nishat Group ("Group") is recognized as one of the largest and most diversified industrial conglomerates in South Asia. The Group has established a reputable market standing, supported by a robust operational track record, diversified revenue streams, and strong financial backing. Whereas, D.G. Khan Cement Company Limited is among the leading players in Pakistan’s cement sector, supported by a sizeable operational footprint and strong sponsor backing.



Business Acumen

The Nishat Group has a diversified presence across key sectors, including textiles, cement, power generation, financial services, and hospitality. Supported by strong industry experience and sound corporate governance, the sponsors have established a credible position in the packaging industry. Mr. Mian Mansha, the visionary behind the Nishat Group, has a long-standing track record of success, which serves as a strong foundation for Nishat Packaging Ltd. Nishat Group is regarded as being on par with multinational companies operating locally in terms of product quality, services, and management expertise. 


Financial Strength

The financial strength of the sponsors is sufficient to support the Company in times of crisis. D.G. Khan Cement Company Limited holds entity ratings of AA-/A1+, while Nishat Mills Limited is rated AA/A1+ by PACRA. As of Sep'25, D.G. Khan Cement Company Limited reported total assets of PKR 152bln and an equity base of PKR 106bln. Meanwhile, Nishat Mills Limited reported total assets of PKR 272bln and an equity base of PKR 156bln during the same period.



Governance
Board Structure

The Board of Directors (BoD) comprises seven members, including female representation. It includes one executive directors and six non-executive directors, with no independent director currently on the Board. However, the Company operates as a subsidiary of a listed entity, the absence of independent representation is partially mitigated through oversight and governance at the parent company level.


Members’ Profile

The BoD, with the diversified background and expertise of its members, is a key source of oversight and guidance for the management. The Chairperson, Mr. Mian Raza Mansha, holds the position of CEO also. He is a seasoned industrialist with over 26 years of diversified business experience. He plays a pivotal role in providing strategic leadership and operational oversight across Group entities. Mr. Raza Mansha has been associated with the Board for ~19 years, contributing towards long-term strategic planning and strengthening the Company’s operational framework. Mr. Mian Hassan Mansha – Non Executive Director, is an industrialist with around 24 years of business experience. His exposure across various Nishat Group ventures provides valuable industry insight. He has been associated with the Board for nearly four years. Ms. Ammil Raza Mansha – Non Executive Director, is an experienced business professional and industrialist with 22 years of overall experience. Her presence also enhances diversity at the Board level. She has been associated with the Board for about six years. Mr. Mahmood Akhtar – Non Executive Director, is a seasoned professional with approximately 40 years of experience. Holding a Master’s degree, he brings extensive corporate and managerial expertise to the Board. His professional background supports effective oversight, operational guidance, and governance strengthening. He has been associated with the Board for approximately six years. Mr. Aftab Ahmed Khan - Executive Director, is a Chartered Accountant with over 53 years of professional experience. He possesses extensive expertise in finance, accounting, and corporate governance. His strong financial acumen supports the Board in strengthening financial discipline and risk oversight. He has been associated with the Board for nearly 19 years. Dr. Arif Bashir – Non Executive Director, holds a PhD and has ~42 years of professional experience. He brings strong academic, research, and corporate advisory expertise to the Board. His diversified knowledge contributes to strategic guidance and governance oversight. He has been associated with the Board for approximately 12 years. Mr. Farid Fazal – Non Executive Director, is an experienced professional with nearly 49 years of industry exposure. His extensive professional background provides valuable insights into corporate management and governance matters. He has remained associated with the Board for ~18 years, contributing to strategic continuity and oversight.


Board Effectiveness

The Board demonstrates strong oversight and strategic guidance through the diverse experience and expertise of its members. The Board benefits from the long-standing tenure and industry knowledge of its members, ensuring continuity, informed decision-making, and effective governance.


Financial Transparency

M/s KPMG Taseer Hadi & Co. are the external auditors of the Company. They have expressed an unqualified opinion on the financial reports for FY25. The firm is QCR rated by ICAP and is in the A Category of SBP’s panel of auditors.


Management
Organizational Structure

To perform well, NPL has structured and organized its organogram as per the operational needs. The Company operates through Procurement, Sales and Marketing, Finance and Accounting, production and Technical department and Administration Departments.



Management Team

The Company has a set of experienced & professional management. The Company’s CEO, Mian Raza Mansha has more than 26 years diversified professional experience in various business sectors including banking, textile, power, cement, insurance, hotels, properties, natural gas, agriculture, dairy etc. He received his bachelor degree from the University of Pennsylvania, USA. Currently, he is on the Board of ten other companies. Mr. Inayat Ullah Niazi serves as the Chief Financial Officer of Nishat Packaging Limited. He is a finance professional with CA (Inter) qualification and possesses approximately 39 years of overall professional experience, including around 37 years of association with the Nishat Group. Mr. Niazi has been serving in his current role for about 19 years, reflecting strong continuity and institutional knowledge within the Company’s financial management framework.



Effectiveness

Management’s effectiveness and efficiency can be ensured through the presence of management committees. At NPL, management committees are not in place. Thus, indicating a room for improvement.


MIS

NPL's manufacturing facilities in Chakwal and in Sheikhupura are connected with the Company’s Head Office in Lahore through an ERP(Oracle based customized system). To facilitate the management, various reports related to Finance, Sales, HR, Production and Import are generated on daily and monthly basis. Other customized reports can be generated on ad hoc basis. Frequecny of these reports may alter as per the managements requirement.


Control Environment

The Company has an internal audit function in place, with effective mechanism for identification, assessment and reporting of all types of risks arising out of the business operations. This function is necessary to provides support, guidance and monitoring of the internally placed SOPs along with conducting Gap Analysis for evaluating already placed policies and procedures.


Business Risk
Industry Dynamics

Pakistan’s packaging industry consists of four major segments: paper, plastic, tinplate, and glass. Paper and plastic segments occupy the major share of total market. NPL operates under the paper and plastic (Polypropylene) segment of the Industry. The demand of NPL is directly correlated with cement production. The segment’s direct costs consist largely of imported raw materials. Therefore, volatility in exchange rates and international price trends has an impact on costs. Pakistan’s cement industry is showing clear signs of recovery after a prolonged slowdown, supported by stabilization under the IMF program. Cement industry demand has strengthened, with overall dispatches rising notably in the first quarter of FY26. Domestic sales increased by 17% due to revived private construction activity, improved project execution, and gradually returning consumer confidence. Exports grew by 21%, driven by stronger sea-based shipments and higher dispatches to Afghanistan, though border tensions pose a risk. Looking ahead, FY26 volumes are expected to reach 51–52 million tons, indicating steady progress toward recovery which will also improve the profitability of cement packaging companies.



Relative Position

Nishat Packaging Ltd is one of the main players in the industry. Large market players in the paper segment are Cherat Packing Ltd, Thal Ltd, and Ultra Pack (Pvt) Limited. Nishat Packaging Limited maintains strong business integration with DG Khan Cement Company Limited, to which it sold ~86.5% of its polypropylene (PP) bag production and ~63.63% of its paper bag production to DG Cement during FY25. During FY25, paper bag production was recorded at 42 million bags, translating into a capacity utilization of 26%, whereas PP bag production reached 50 million bags, reflecting a utilization level of 56%. Accordingly, the overall plant utilization remained at 37%. Moving forward, the Company aims to expand PP bag production optimize utilization, and stabilize profitability.


Revenues

The Company generates revenue by selling bags to cement manufacturers. Some of its customers are D.G. Khan Cement, Lucky Cement Ltd. and Maple leaf Cement. The top 3 Customers generated more than 93% of the total revenue. During FY25, the revenue of the Company inclined by 32% YoY and stood at ~PKR 3.3bln (FY24: ~PKR 2.5bln). During FY25, the Company’s revenue mix remained predominantly driven by paper bag sales, which accounted for more than 70% of the total revenue, while the remaining contribution was generated from polypropylene (PP) bags.



Margins

The Company’s gross profit margin improved from approximately 10.2% in FY24 to 13.1% in FY25, primarily due to sales volumes of PP bags. Net Margin inclined to ~15.5% FY25 (FY24: -11.4%) as a result of a significant rise in revenue and gain on sale of one paper plant. The Company has posted a net profit of PKR 510mln during FY25 (FY24: PKR -285mln). 


Sustainability

The Company is a backward integration of D.G. Khan Cement. The main purpose of the Company is to supply packaging material to the related Company. Aligning with the industry's demand pattern and gradual shift towards Polypropylene bags from kraft paper bags, NPL has strategically installed its new PP line with a capacity slightly exceeding the needs of D.G. Khan Cement. Moving forward, the Company aims to expand PP bag production, optimize utilization, and stabilize profitability.


Financial Risk
Working capital

The Company’s working capital requirements are a function of its inventory, trade receivables, and trade payables which are financed through borrowings and FCFO. The inventory days of Nishat Packaging Limited stood at ~148 days during FY25 (FY24: ~170 days) and the receivable days decreased to ~84 days (FY24 ~107 days). Resultantly, the net working capital days decreased to ~226 days during FY25 (FY24: ~275 days).


Coverages

During FY25, NPL’s FCFO’s stood at ~PKR 515mln increasing from ~PKR 216mln in FY24. The FCFO/Finance cost also showed a increase to ~1.3x of coverage during FY25 from ~ 0.4x during FY24 due to incline in FCFO. 



Capitalization

The Company has a leveraged capital structure. Long-term debt is related to expansion activities, whereas short-term debt has increased substantially pursuant to slow movement in receivables. However, the majority of receivables are from the related party which gives comfort to the credit risk. The Company’s gearing ratio increased to ~65.7% in FY25 from ~62.0% in FY24 due to a rise in borrowings from PKR 3.5bln to PKR 5.7bln. This was primarily driven by the installation of a new polypropylene plant, largely financed through debt with a minor equity contribution. The equity of the Company stood at PKR 2.9bln at the end of FY25 (FY24: PKR 2.2bln).



 
 

Feb-26

www.pacra.com


(PKR mln)


Jun-25
12M
Jun-24
12M
Jun-23
12M
Audited Audited Audited
A. BALANCE SHEET
1. Non-Current Assets 4,651 1,941 1,155
2. Investments 0 0 0
3. Related Party Exposure 1,369 1,047 528
4. Current Assets 4,817 3,798 3,915
a. Inventories 1,917 730 1,598
b. Trade Receivables 1,129 388 1,072
5. Total Assets 10,837 6,785 5,597
6. Current Liabilities 1,916 746 696
a. Trade Payables 104 10 17
7. Borrowings 5,749 3,593 2,754
8. Related Party Exposure 0 0 0
9. Non-Current Liabilities 176 244 179
10. Net Assets 2,997 2,203 1,968
11. Shareholders' Equity 2,997 2,203 1,968
B. INCOME STATEMENT
1. Sales 3,294 2,497 3,092
a. Cost of Good Sold (2,859) (2,242) (2,611)
2. Gross Profit 435 254 480
a. Operating Expenses (37) (32) (59)
3. Operating Profit 398 222 421
a. Non Operating Income or (Expense) 663 149 (222)
4. Profit or (Loss) before Interest and Tax 1,061 371 199
a. Total Finance Cost (415) (537) (462)
b. Taxation (135) (118) 86
6. Net Income Or (Loss) 510 (285) (177)
C. CASH FLOW STATEMENT
a. Free Cash Flows from Operations (FCFO) 515 216 100
b. Net Cash from Operating Activities before Working Capital Changes 515 (302) (291)
c. Changes in Working Capital 75 18 (618)
1. Net Cash provided by Operating Activities 590 (284) (909)
2. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Investing Activities (2,251) (538) (338)
3. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Financing Activities 1,252 1,226 (230)
4. Net Cash generated or (Used) during the period (409) 404 (1,476)
D. RATIO ANALYSIS
1. Performance
a. Sales Growth (for the period) 31.9% -19.2% 0.0%
b. Gross Profit Margin 13.2% 10.2% 15.5%
c. Net Profit Margin 15.5% -11.4% -5.7%
d. Cash Conversion Efficiency (FCFO adjusted for Working Capital/Sales) 17.9% 9.4% -16.8%
e. Return on Equity [ Net Profit Margin * Asset Turnover * (Total Assets/Shareholders' Equity )] 19.6% -13.6% -9.0%
2. Working Capital Management
a. Gross Working Capital (Average Days) 233 277 315
b. Net Working Capital (Average Days) 226 275 313
c. Current Ratio (Current Assets / Current Liabilities) 2.5 5.1 5.6
3. Coverages
a. EBITDA / Finance Cost 1.2 0.5 0.4
b. FCFO / Finance Cost+CMLTB+Excess STB 1.3 0.3 0.1
c. Debt Payback (Total Borrowings+Excess STB) / (FCFO-Finance Cost) 29.9 -4.9 -0.9
4. Capital Structure
a. Total Borrowings / (Total Borrowings+Shareholders' Equity) 65.7% 62.0% 58.3%
b. Interest or Markup Payable (Days) 289.1 92.9 94.9
c. Entity Average Borrowing Rate 8.9% 17.6% 17.4%

Feb-26

www.pacra.com

Feb-26

www.pacra.com

  1. Rating Team Statements
    1. Rating is just an opinion about the creditworthiness of the entity and does not constitute a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell any security of the entity rated or to buy, hold, or sell the security rated, as the case may be. (Chapter III; 14-3-(x))
    2. Conflict of Interest
      1. The Rating Team or any of their family members have no interest in this rating (Chapter III; 12-2-(j))
      2. PACRA, the analysts involved in the rating process, and members of its rating committee and their family members do not have any conflict of interest relating to the rating done by them (Chapter III; 12-2-(e) & (k))
      3. The analyst is not a substantial shareholder of the customer being rated by PACRA [Annexure F; d-(ii)]
      4. Explanation: for the purpose of the above clause, the term "family members" shall include only those family members who are dependent on the analyst and members of the rating committee.
  2. Restrictions
    1. No director, officer, or employee of PACRA communicates the information acquired by him for use for rating purposes to any other person, except where required under law to do so. (Chapter III; 10-(5))
    2. PACRA does not disclose or discuss with outside parties or make improper use of the non-public information which has come to its knowledge during a business relationship with the customer. (Chapter III; 10-7-(d))
    3. PACRA does not make proposals or recommendations regarding the activities of rated entities that could impact a credit rating of the entity subject to rating. (Chapter III; 10-7-(k))
  3. Conduct of Business
    1. PACRA fulfills its obligations in a fair, efficient, transparent, and ethical manner and renders high standards of services in performing its functions and obligations. (Chapter III; 11-A-(a))
    2. PACRA uses due care in the preparation of this Rating Report. Our information has been obtained from sources we consider to be reliable, but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. PACRA does not, in every instance, independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing this Rating Report. (Clause 11-(A)(p))
    3. PACRA prohibits its employees and analysts from soliciting money, gifts, or favors from anyone with whom PACRA conducts business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(q))
    4. PACRA ensures before the commencement of the rating process that an analyst or employee has not had a recent employment or other significant business or personal relationship with the rated entity that may cause or may be perceived as causing a conflict of interest. (Chapter III; 11-A-(r))
    5. PACRA maintains the principle of integrity in seeking rating business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(u))
    6. PACRA promptly investigates in the event of misconduct or a breach of the policies, procedures, and controls, and takes appropriate steps to rectify any weaknesses to prevent any recurrence, along with suitable punitive action against the responsible employee(s). (Chapter III; 11-B-(m))
  4. Independence & Conflict of Interest
    1. PACRA receives compensation from the entity being rated or any third party for the rating services it offers. The receipt of this compensation has no influence on PACRA’s opinions or other analytical processes. In all instances, PACRA is committed to preserving the objectivity, integrity, and independence of its ratings. Our relationship is governed by two distinct mandates: i) rating mandate - signed with the entity being rated or issuer of the debt instrument, and ii) fee mandate - signed with the payer, which can be different from the entity.
    2. PACRA does not provide consultancy/advisory services or other services to any of its customers or their associated companies and associated undertakings that are being rated or have been rated by it during the preceding three years, unless it has an adequate mechanism in place ensuring that the provision of such services does not lead to a conflict of interest situation with its rating activities. (Chapter III; 12-2-(d))
    3. PACRA discloses that no shareholder directly or indirectly holding 10% or more of the share capital of PACRA also holds directly or indirectly 10% or more of the share capital of the entity which is subject to rating or the entity which issued the instrument subject to rating by PACRA. (Chapter III; 12-2-(f))
    4. PACRA ensures that the rating assigned to an entity or instrument is not affected by the existence of a business relationship between PACRA and the entity or any other party, or the non-existence of such a relationship. (Chapter III; 12-2-(i))
    5. PACRA ensures that the analysts or any of their family members shall not buy, sell, or engage in any transaction in any security which falls in the analyst’s area of primary analytical responsibility. This clause, however, does not apply to investments in securities through collective investment schemes. (Chapter III; 12-2-(l))
    6. PACRA has established policies and procedures governing investments and trading in securities by its employees and for monitoring the same to prevent insider trading, market manipulation, or any other market abuse. (Chapter III; 11-B-(g))
  5. Monitoring and Review
    1. PACRA monitors all the outstanding ratings continuously, and any potential change therein due to any event associated with the issuer, the security arrangement, the industry, etc., is disseminated to the market immediately and in an effective manner after appropriate consultation with the entity/issuer. (Chapter III; 17-(a))
    2. PACRA reviews all the outstanding ratings periodically on an annual basis. Provided that public dissemination of annual review and in an instance of change in rating will be made. (Chapter III; 17-(b))
    3. PACRA initiates an immediate review of the outstanding rating upon becoming aware of any information that may reasonably be expected to result in downgrading of the rating. (Chapter III; 17-(c))
    4. PACRA engages with the issuer and the debt securities trustee to remain updated on all information pertaining to the rating of the entity/instrument. (Chapter III; 17-(d))
  6. Probability of Default
    1. PACRA’s Rating Scale reflects the expectation of credit risk. The highest rating has the lowest relative likelihood of default (i.e., probability). PACRA’s transition studies capture the historical performance behavior of a specific rating notch. Transition behavior of the assigned rating can be obtained from PACRA’s Transition Study available at our website. (www.pacra.com) However, the actual transition of rating may not follow the pattern observed in the past. (Chapter III; 14-3(f)(vii))
  7. Proprietary Information
    1. All information contained herein is considered proprietary by PACRA. Hence, none of the information in this document can be copied or otherwise reproduced, stored, or disseminated in whole or in part in any form or by any means whatsoever by any person without PACRA’s prior written consent.

Feb-26

www.pacra.com