Rating History
Dissemination Date Long-Term Rating Short-Term Rating Outlook Action Rating Watch
13-Feb-26 BBB- A3 Stable Downgrade -
14-Feb-25 BBB A2 Stable Downgrade YES
16-Feb-24 BBB+ A2 Stable Maintain YES
18-Feb-23 BBB+ A2 Stable Maintain YES
19-Feb-22 BBB+ A2 Stable Maintain -
About the Entity

Maqbool Textile Mills Limited (“MTML” or “the Company”), incorporated in 1989, is a public listed company. The Company has an installed capacity of 82,224 spindles and 576 MVS spindles. MTML is primarily owned by the Maqbool family (75.20%) and others (24.8%). The board comprises ten members. Out of this, four directors are non-executive, three directors occupy executive roles, and three directors are independent. Seven board members represent the Maqbool family. Mr. Mian Tanvir Ahmed Sheikh, the CEO, carries with him extensive experience in the textile sector and is supported by an experienced management team.

Rating Rationale

The rating decision of Maqbool Textile Mills Limited (“MTML” or “the Company”) reflects its weakened business fundamentals, which have negatively affected its financial risk profile. The downgrade is primarily attributable to recurring losses in the preceding years, which have substantially eroded the Company’s equity base, resulting in liquidity pressures. The Company witnessed operational losses during FY25 and 3MFY26 due to elevated input costs. MTML primarily engages in the spinning segment, producing CVC yarn, PC yarn, PV yarn, and PP yarn. With minimal product diversification and diminishing margins, the Company remained vulnerable to market fluctuations, contributing to a decline in its market share in recent years.

MTML encountered significant challenges, resulting in a persistent decline in revenue base over the years, with ~30% decline witnessed during FY26 and ~18% during FY25. The Company’s reliance on short-term borrowings to bridge the funding gap and intake of additional long-term debt during the year resulted in a highly leveraged company profile. The debt and interest coverage witnessed a decline due to an elevated total debt profile and diminished cash flows, despite the monetary easing during the year. The Company continues to face equity pressures, with erosion reaching 34.7% during FY25, while ROE remained deeply negative at -46.8% in 3MFY26 (FY25: -42.2%). Reliance on external funding, including recurring capital injections by sponsors, to operationally support the Company depicts its weakened business profile.

The Company’s interest coverage remained low with a declining trend, indicating the limited ability to meet interest obligations from operating profits. Furthermore, the Company’s financial risk profile remains pressured due to diminishing current ratio and stressed credit quality metrics. Rationalization of funding structures and implementing a strategic plan to strengthen the business fundamentals remain vital.

Key Rating Drivers

The ratings depend on the Company improving its business volumes and core profitability, maintaining capacity utilization, generating sufficient cash flows, and recovering coverage ratios. Improvement in the current debt matrix remains crucial.

Profile
Legal Structure

Maqbool Textile Mills Limited (`MTML' or 'the Company') the flagship company of Maqbool Group — commenced operations in 1989 and is listed on the Pakistan Stock Exchange. With its head office based in Multan, the Company is engaged in cotton ginning, manufacturing, and sale of cotton and polyester yarn.


Background

Maqbool Group started operations in 1958, with the incorporation of a yarn spinning unit Allawasaya Textiles & Finishing Limited. At present, the group has main interests in textile and seed oil extraction businesses. It was set up by the Maqbool family, a well-reputed business family of industrialists in Multan.


Operations

The Company is engaged in cotton ginning, manufacturing, and sale of yarn, cotton seed, and cotton lint. The Company operates with four spinning units installed at Muzaffargarh (Unit I, II, and IV), and Tobatek Singh (Unit III), having a total operational capacity of 82,224 spindles (at Unit 1,2 & 3) and 576 MSV installed spindles (at unit-4) which are equivalent to ~12,000 conventional spindles. The current energy requirement of the Company stood at 7 megawatts, which is primarily met through internally installed solar capacity, and WAPDA. The Company's registered office is located at 2-Industrial Estate Multan, Pakistan


Ownership
Ownership Structure

Maqbool Textile is a public listed company with a majority stake held by Maqbool Group which is directly owned by individuals. Maqbool family holds a 75.2% stake in the Company while the remaining 24.8% stake is held by shareholders.


Stability

The second generation of the family has already been in business, serving in various capacities. No change in the ownership structure is anticipated in the foreseeable future. Furthermore, a formal succession plan will further improve the ownership prole of the Company.


Business Acumen

MTML is one of the longest-established textile houses and has been operating under Mian Tanveer Ahmed Sheikh for over three decades. Over this period, the Company has developed signicant expertise in spinning and successfully expanded its operations, demonstrating resilience and adaptability within the highly competitive textile industry.


Financial Strength

Besides MTML, Maqbool Group has invested in Mehmooda Maqbool Mills Limited. The sponsors of the Company have shown commitment to support Maqbool Textile, in case of need.


Governance
Board Structure

MTML's board comprises ten members. Seven members are from the sponsoring family. Four members are nonexecutive directors, three directors carry the executive role and three are independent directors. Ms. Romana Tanvir Sheikh serves the role of Chairperson. The inclusion of independent oversight has strengthened the governance matrix of the Company


Members’ Profile

Mr. Mian Tanvir Ahmed Sheikh is the Company's Chief Executive Ofcer. Tanvir Ahmad Sheikh is the renowned Industrialist of the Country having a Master‘s Degree in Business Administration from OHIO University, U.S.A. He has been quite successfully running the Complex Industrial Units of his Group since 1981. Mian Anis Ahmad Shiekh and Mian Atta Sha Tanvir Sheikh occupy the executive roles on the board along with the CEO. Both directors have extensive experience in the textile sector.



Board Effectiveness

The Board is supported by two specialized committees: (i) the Audit Committee and (ii) the HR & Remuneration Committee, which provide assistance on relevant governance matters. To ensure effective oversight and decisionmaking, board meetings are held regularly, with formal documentation of meeting minutes maintained.


Financial Transparency

M/s. Yousaf Adil & Co. Chartered Accountants are the external auditors of the Company. The auditors have issued a qualied opinion on the Company's financial statements for the period ending June 30th, 2025.


Management
Organizational Structure

The organizational structure of the Company is divided into ve main functions, namely i) Sales & Marketing, ii) Procurement, iii) Admin & Finance, iv) Production, v) IT. All operational departments report directly to the CEO, while the procurement department reports to the CEO and chairperson simultaneously.


Management Team

The current CEO of the Company, Mr. Mian Tanvir Ahmed Sheikh has been associated with the Company since its inception. Mr. Tanvir is a distinguished industrialist with a Master's degree in Business Administration from Ohio University, USA. He has been successfully managing a group of industrial units since 1981. Mr. Ahsan Raza holds the position of deputy CFO in the Company.


Effectiveness

The management meetings are held daily with follow-up points to resolve or proactively address operational issues, if any, eventually ensuring a smooth ow of operations. However, no management committees exist and the establishment will augment the management prole of the Company.


MIS

The Company's operating environment depends upon an IT Infrastructure supported by an in-house programmed ERP. The IT system is fully integrated into all major departments and ensures proper financial and operational control. Daily reports include cash and bank position, stock consumption, per-spindle cost, receivables, and inventory status while monthly production accounts are also maintained.


Control Environment

Production is completely order-driven to avoid stock pile-ups. There is a quality control department in place to audit the quality of the output. HSE infrastructure seems appropriate and is emphasized. The Company has adequate relevant quality control standards to meet export requirements. The Company has in-house internal audit department. The head of internal audit is reportable to the CFO.


Business Risk
Industry Dynamics

The textile exports of the country reached USD 16.7bln in FY25, a slight increase from USD 16.5bln in the previous year, reecting a growth of 0.93% YoY. The highest contribution came from the composite and garments segment at USD 9.1bln, followed by the weaving segment at USD 6.5bln and the spinning segment at USD 1.0bln. During 5MFY25, the textile exports stood at USD 7.6bln. In FY25, the transition from the final tax regime to the normal tax regime is set to impact the profitability matrix of export-oriented units, with a 29% tax on prfiots and a super tax of up to 10%. The consistent decline in policy rates over the last two quarters, along with the anticipation of further reductions, is expected to provide a cushion in the financial metrics of the industry.


Relative Position

The Maqbool family has been associated with the textile business since 1958. However, as a group and on a standalone basis, their market share in the spinning sector is moderate. The company has installed a capacity of 82,224 spindles along with 576 MVS spindles in its production facilities. Considering the the existing capacity, the Company is considered a mid tier player in the Spinning segment.


Revenues

During FY25, the Company’s profitability remained under pressure amid weakening revenue and margin compression. Revenue declined to PKR 8.4bln (FY24: PKR 10.3bln 3MFY26: 1.4bln), reflecting subdued business activity during the year. Gross margins deteriorated significantly to 0.7% (FY24: 3.7% 3MFY26: 0.8%), driven by rising cost pressures and limited pricing flexibility. Consequently, the Company slipped into losses with net margin declining to -1.7% (FY24: 0.3% 3MFY26: -4.2%), indicating a reversal in earnings performance. Return indicators also weakened, with ROE worsening to -41.7% (FY24: -27.8% 3MFY26: -42.6%), while ROA declined to 93.5% (FY24: 117.3% 3MFY26: 66.6%), highlighting reduced efficiency in generating returns from shareholders’ equity and asset base.


Margins

During FY25, the company’s gross margins declined to 0.7% (FY24: 3.7% 3MFY26: 0.8%), reflecting continued pressure on profitability amid rising costs and weak pricing power. This translated into a deterioration in overall earnings performance, with net margins slipping into negative territory at -1.7% (FY24: 0.3% 3MFY26: -4.2%), indicating a reversal from profitability in the previous year. Finance cost eased to 6.0% (FY24: 7.3% 3MFY26: 6.0%), providing some relief at the financing level. However, return indicators remained under stress, highlighting weakened efficiency in generating returns for shareholders and from the asset base.


Sustainability

The company is actively pursuing sustainability by enhancing operational efficiency and profitability through regular Balancing, Modernization, and Replacement (BMR) initiatives. Additionally, the Company is strategically reducing its energy costs by transitioning from WAPDA to solar power as energy costs constitute the primary risk factor for the sustainability of the Company’s cost structure, as evidenced by an 83.16% increase in power and fuel expenses, which has a significant impact on profitability.


Financial Risk
Working capital

At the end of 3MFY26, the company’s net working capital cycle increased to 87 days (FY24: 72 days), reflecting a decline in overall working capital efficiency. This decline came amid an increase in inventory days, which stood at 68 days (FY24: 62 days 3MFY26: 72 days), indicating relatively slower inventory turnover during the year. Trade receivable days remained stable at 35 days (FY24: 35 days), suggesting consistent credit management and collection efficiency, However during 3MFY26 there was an uptick of 67 days. Meanwhile, gross working capital days increased to 103 days (FY24: 96 days 3MFY26: 140), highlighting a higher level of funds tied up in current assets, which may exert pressure on short-term liquidity if not managed prudently.


Coverages

During FY25, the Company’s coverage profile weakened, reflecting increased stress on its ability to meet financial obligations. Funds from Cash Operations (FCFO) declined sharply to 77 (FY24: 111 3MFY26: -11), indicating reduced internal cash generation available to service financing needs. Finance cost coverage also deteriorated to 0.3x (FY24: 0.4x 3MFY26: 0.2), highlighting a limited cushion to absorb debt servicing requirements. Moreover, the liquidity position turned negative, standing at -1.7 (FY24: 0.2 3MFY26: -1.5), underscoring mounting pressure on short-term solvency and signaling heightened reliance on external funding or working capital support.


Capitalization

At end-FY25, the Company’s capital structure remained highly leveraged, with total borrowings increasing to PKR 69.1bln (FY24: PKR 60.5bln 3MFY26: 68.2%), reflecting a continued reliance on debt financing. The composition of borrowings shifted in favor of longer-tenure facilities, as short-term borrowings declined to 48.9% of total borrowings (FY24: 82.9% 3MFY26: 50.5%), indicating re-profiling in the maturity profile of the Company’s debt. However, despite this restructuring, the elevated level of leverage continues to pose pressure on the Company’s financial risk profile.


 
 

Feb-26

www.pacra.com


(PKR mln)


Sep-25
3M
Jun-25
12M
Jun-24
12M
Jun-23
12M
A. BALANCE SHEET
1. Non-Current Assets 5,420 5,477 5,245 4,472
2. Investments 10 10 10 10
3. Related Party Exposure 0 0 0 0
4. Current Assets 3,359 3,530 3,834 4,019
a. Inventories 1,027 1,318 1,838 1,645
b. Trade Receivables 1,113 1,078 550 1,404
5. Total Assets 8,789 9,017 9,089 8,502
6. Current Liabilities 2,763 3,023 2,254 1,570
a. Trade Payables 809 918 633 720
7. Borrowings 3,518 3,339 3,666 3,632
8. Related Party Exposure 258 223 0 0
9. Non-Current Liabilities 872 882 780 670
10. Net Assets 1,378 1,550 2,389 2,629
11. Shareholders' Equity 1,379 1,550 2,373 2,629
B. INCOME STATEMENT
1. Sales 1,481 8,460 10,314 9,837
a. Cost of Good Sold (1,470) (8,402) (9,934) (9,181)
2. Gross Profit 11 58 380 656
a. Operating Expenses (74) (205) (346) (360)
3. Operating Profit (63) (146) 34 296
a. Non Operating Income or (Expense) 0 (81) (96) 31
4. Profit or (Loss) before Interest and Tax (63) (227) (62) 327
a. Total Finance Cost (90) (513) (767) (633)
b. Taxation (19) (88) 130 (93)
6. Net Income Or (Loss) (171) (827) (698) (399)
C. CASH FLOW STATEMENT
a. Free Cash Flows from Operations (FCFO) (11) 77 111 379
b. Net Cash from Operating Activities before Working Capital Changes (47) (521) (638) (168)
c. Changes in Working Capital (154) 1,095 686 100
1. Net Cash provided by Operating Activities (200) 575 49 (68)
2. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Investing Activities (13) (459) (150) (264)
3. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Financing Activities 214 545 (349) 191
4. Net Cash generated or (Used) during the period 0 661 (450) (141)
D. RATIO ANALYSIS
1. Performance
a. Sales Growth (for the period) -30.0% -18.0% 4.8% -5.2%
b. Gross Profit Margin 0.8% 0.7% 3.7% 6.7%
c. Net Profit Margin -11.6% -9.8% -6.8% -4.1%
d. Cash Conversion Efficiency (FCFO adjusted for Working Capital/Sales) -11.1% 13.9% 7.7% 4.9%
e. Return on Equity [ Net Profit Margin * Asset Turnover * (Total Assets/Shareholders' Equity )] -46.8% -42.2% -27.9% -14.5%
2. Working Capital Management
a. Gross Working Capital (Average Days) 140 103 96 106
b. Net Working Capital (Average Days) 87 70 72 85
c. Current Ratio (Current Assets / Current Liabilities) 1.2 1.2 1.7 2.6
3. Coverages
a. EBITDA / Finance Cost 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.9
b. FCFO / Finance Cost+CMLTB+Excess STB -0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3
c. Debt Payback (Total Borrowings+Excess STB) / (FCFO-Finance Cost) -7.9 -7.1 -3.2 -4.9
4. Capital Structure
a. Total Borrowings / (Total Borrowings+Shareholders' Equity) 73.3% 69.7% 60.7% 58.0%
b. Interest or Markup Payable (Days) 153.9 69.0 87.8 95.7
c. Entity Average Borrowing Rate 9.8% 14.0% 20.5% 15.8%

Feb-26

www.pacra.com

Feb-26

www.pacra.com

  1. Rating Team Statements
    1. Rating is just an opinion about the creditworthiness of the entity and does not constitute a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell any security of the entity rated or to buy, hold, or sell the security rated, as the case may be. (Chapter III; 14-3-(x))
    2. Conflict of Interest
      1. The Rating Team or any of their family members have no interest in this rating (Chapter III; 12-2-(j))
      2. PACRA, the analysts involved in the rating process, and members of its rating committee and their family members do not have any conflict of interest relating to the rating done by them (Chapter III; 12-2-(e) & (k))
      3. The analyst is not a substantial shareholder of the customer being rated by PACRA [Annexure F; d-(ii)]
      4. Explanation: for the purpose of the above clause, the term "family members" shall include only those family members who are dependent on the analyst and members of the rating committee.
  2. Restrictions
    1. No director, officer, or employee of PACRA communicates the information acquired by him for use for rating purposes to any other person, except where required under law to do so. (Chapter III; 10-(5))
    2. PACRA does not disclose or discuss with outside parties or make improper use of the non-public information which has come to its knowledge during a business relationship with the customer. (Chapter III; 10-7-(d))
    3. PACRA does not make proposals or recommendations regarding the activities of rated entities that could impact a credit rating of the entity subject to rating. (Chapter III; 10-7-(k))
  3. Conduct of Business
    1. PACRA fulfills its obligations in a fair, efficient, transparent, and ethical manner and renders high standards of services in performing its functions and obligations. (Chapter III; 11-A-(a))
    2. PACRA uses due care in the preparation of this Rating Report. Our information has been obtained from sources we consider to be reliable, but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. PACRA does not, in every instance, independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing this Rating Report. (Clause 11-(A)(p))
    3. PACRA prohibits its employees and analysts from soliciting money, gifts, or favors from anyone with whom PACRA conducts business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(q))
    4. PACRA ensures before the commencement of the rating process that an analyst or employee has not had a recent employment or other significant business or personal relationship with the rated entity that may cause or may be perceived as causing a conflict of interest. (Chapter III; 11-A-(r))
    5. PACRA maintains the principle of integrity in seeking rating business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(u))
    6. PACRA promptly investigates in the event of misconduct or a breach of the policies, procedures, and controls, and takes appropriate steps to rectify any weaknesses to prevent any recurrence, along with suitable punitive action against the responsible employee(s). (Chapter III; 11-B-(m))
  4. Independence & Conflict of Interest
    1. PACRA receives compensation from the entity being rated or any third party for the rating services it offers. The receipt of this compensation has no influence on PACRA’s opinions or other analytical processes. In all instances, PACRA is committed to preserving the objectivity, integrity, and independence of its ratings. Our relationship is governed by two distinct mandates: i) rating mandate - signed with the entity being rated or issuer of the debt instrument, and ii) fee mandate - signed with the payer, which can be different from the entity.
    2. PACRA does not provide consultancy/advisory services or other services to any of its customers or their associated companies and associated undertakings that are being rated or have been rated by it during the preceding three years, unless it has an adequate mechanism in place ensuring that the provision of such services does not lead to a conflict of interest situation with its rating activities. (Chapter III; 12-2-(d))
    3. PACRA discloses that no shareholder directly or indirectly holding 10% or more of the share capital of PACRA also holds directly or indirectly 10% or more of the share capital of the entity which is subject to rating or the entity which issued the instrument subject to rating by PACRA. (Chapter III; 12-2-(f))
    4. PACRA ensures that the rating assigned to an entity or instrument is not affected by the existence of a business relationship between PACRA and the entity or any other party, or the non-existence of such a relationship. (Chapter III; 12-2-(i))
    5. PACRA ensures that the analysts or any of their family members shall not buy, sell, or engage in any transaction in any security which falls in the analyst’s area of primary analytical responsibility. This clause, however, does not apply to investments in securities through collective investment schemes. (Chapter III; 12-2-(l))
    6. PACRA has established policies and procedures governing investments and trading in securities by its employees and for monitoring the same to prevent insider trading, market manipulation, or any other market abuse. (Chapter III; 11-B-(g))
  5. Monitoring and Review
    1. PACRA monitors all the outstanding ratings continuously, and any potential change therein due to any event associated with the issuer, the security arrangement, the industry, etc., is disseminated to the market immediately and in an effective manner after appropriate consultation with the entity/issuer. (Chapter III; 17-(a))
    2. PACRA reviews all the outstanding ratings periodically on an annual basis. Provided that public dissemination of annual review and in an instance of change in rating will be made. (Chapter III; 17-(b))
    3. PACRA initiates an immediate review of the outstanding rating upon becoming aware of any information that may reasonably be expected to result in downgrading of the rating. (Chapter III; 17-(c))
    4. PACRA engages with the issuer and the debt securities trustee to remain updated on all information pertaining to the rating of the entity/instrument. (Chapter III; 17-(d))
  6. Probability of Default
    1. PACRA’s Rating Scale reflects the expectation of credit risk. The highest rating has the lowest relative likelihood of default (i.e., probability). PACRA’s transition studies capture the historical performance behavior of a specific rating notch. Transition behavior of the assigned rating can be obtained from PACRA’s Transition Study available at our website. (www.pacra.com) However, the actual transition of rating may not follow the pattern observed in the past. (Chapter III; 14-3(f)(vii))
  7. Proprietary Information
    1. All information contained herein is considered proprietary by PACRA. Hence, none of the information in this document can be copied or otherwise reproduced, stored, or disseminated in whole or in part in any form or by any means whatsoever by any person without PACRA’s prior written consent.

Feb-26

www.pacra.com