Rating History
Dissemination Date Long-Term Rating Short-Term Rating Outlook Action Rating Watch
20-Feb-26 A- A2 Stable Maintain -
21-Feb-25 A- A2 Stable Maintain -
22-Feb-24 A- A2 Stable Maintain -
22-Feb-23 A- A2 Stable Maintain -
22-Feb-22 A- A2 Stable Initial -
About the Entity

Alhamd Corporation (Pvt.) Limited was incorporated in 1983 as a private limited company. The Company operates a manufacturing facility in Dera Ghazi Khan, one of Pakistan’s prominent cotton-growing regions, which provides strategic proximity to key raw material sources. The majority shareholding (~74%) is held by Mr. Sheikh Afzaal Ahmed, while his son, Mr. Asad Imdad Sheikh, holds ~25% of the Company’s equity. The Board comprises three members, including two representatives from the sponsoring family—Mr. Sheikh Afzaal Ahmed and Mr. Asad Imdad Sheikh—while the remaining position is held by an executive director.

Rating Rationale

The ratings of Alhamd Corporation (Pvt.) Limited (“ACL” or “the Company”) reflect its adequate positioning within Pakistan’s spinning industry. The principal activity of the Company entails the manufacturing and sale of various categories of yarn. ACL’s product portfolio includes PC, CVT, CT, and combed yarn. The sales mix remains largely concentrated in the local market, with a relatively modest contribution from exports. ACL operates in a challenging industry environment. Pakistan’s spinning sector continues to operate under a stressed environment characterized by persistent margin compression, elevated energy tariffs, and high cotton procurement costs. Despite a modest recovery in yarn production during FY25, sector profitability has remained negative, with yarn exports declining ~30% YoY basis in PKR value. The withdrawal of concessional energy tariffs and revision in the tax regime have further intensified cost pressures, while elevated leverage and interest coverage below ~2.0x reflect constrained financial flexibility across the segment. Although recent policy rate easing and amendments in import duties may provide gradual relief, the sector remains exposed to raw material price volatility, energy supply disruptions, and intense regional competition, keeping the near-term outlook cautious. Within this backdrop, during FY25 and 1QFY26, the Company sustained its focus on coarser yarn counts in line with prevailing demand dynamics. However, the topline contracted, reflecting a decline of ~11.4% during FY25 and a ~33% in the first quarter of FY26. Lower volumes and pricing pressures translated into a decline in gross margins, resulting in operational contraction during the year and losses for the first quarter of FY26. Sustained Elevation in finance costs, amid a leveraged capital structure and sizable working capital borrowings, continued to weigh on the bottom line. Consequently, the Company reported net losses for year end and the preceding first quarter. Energy and other input costs further constrained margin recovery. The funding mix comprises short-term conventional borrowings, constituting ~40% of total borrowings, while the remaining portfolio includes long-term borrowings from financial institutions and subsidized facilities from SBP, along with sponsor support. The capital structure remains leveraged, with a stretched working capital cycle at ~125 days (1QFY25: ~97 days). The coverages are subdued, with EBITDA to finance cost at ~1.1x. Going forward, management expects gradual improvement in operational performance through stabilization in demand and cost rationalization initiatives, including the planned ~8.5 MW solar project.

Key Rating Drivers

The ratings remain dependent upon the Company’s ability to restore profitability, generate sufficient cash flows, strengthen coverages, and maintain its financial risk profile at an adequate level.

Profile
Legal Structure

The Company was incorporated in 1983 as a public limited Company under the name "Alhamd Textile Mills Limited" or the "ACL". It was listed on the Karachi Stock Exchange and Lahore Stock Exchange in 1988. Afterward, it was voluntarily delisted from the stock exchanges in 2004 and subsequently converted into a private limited Company in 2005.


Background

The Company was once part of a group of companies led by Sheikh Imdad Ahmed (late). He was the driving force behind the establishment of the Company and served in the capacity of the Chairman. After the death of Sheikh Imdad Ahmed, the Company went through an amicable business settlement between his four sons. As a consequence of this settlement, 99.64% of the Company’s paid-up shares were transferred to Sheikh Afzaal Ahmed and his immediate family in 1998.


Operations

The principal activity of ACL is the manufacturing and sale of cotton/blended yarn. Its operational infrastructure includes two state-of-the-art spinning facilities with a cumulative annual production capacity of ~170,472 spindles (Unit I with 126,696 spindles & Unit II with 43,776 spindles). The Company's registered head office is located at 29-A, Block E1, Gulberg III, Lahore, while the manufacturing facility is situated at Dera Ghazi Khan, which is considered a major cotton cultivation area in Pakistan. The Company fulfills its energy requirements through connections with Gas and WAPDA. To optimize production costs, the management will invest in an 8.5-megawatt solar power project, which will be commissioned by the end of March 2026.


Ownership
Ownership Structure

Alhamd Corporation (Pvt.) Limited is a family-owned business. Mr. Sheikh Afzaal Ahmed holds a 74% stake, while his son, Mr. Asad Imdad Sheikh, owns a 25% stake.


Stability

The Company's ownership is predominantly concentrated within the Sheikh family, with the majority of shares held by key family members. A small portion of the Company’s shares is distributed among a few other individuals, some of whom are also family members. This clear distribution of shareholding, with the Sheikh family maintaining control, indicates a well-defined and structured line of succession, ensuring continuity and stability in leadership for the Company’s future.


Business Acumen

The Sheikh family has a rich history in the textile industry, spanning over three decades, which has equipped them with a wealth of technical expertise and industry insight. Sheikh Afzaal Ahmed, the key figure behind the Company's operations, possesses a deep understanding and sharp acumen in textile spinning, a core area of the business. His extensive experience in the field has played a critical role in ensuring the Company’s operations remain efficient and sustainable. This foundation not only drives the Company’s day-to-day activities but also positions it for long-term success in the competitive landscape.


Financial Strength

The financial strength of the sponsor family is considered adequate. The Company being the only operational Company of the shareholders reflects the sponsor's willingness to support if needed.


Governance
Board Structure

The Board comprises three members, including two representatives from the sponsoring family—Mr. Sheikh Afzaal Ahmed and Mr. Asad Imdad Sheikh—while the remaining member serves as an executive director. Mr. Sheikh Afzaal Ahmed holds the dual role of Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board. The sponsor-dominated composition and relatively small size of the Board indicate potential room for strengthening the Company’s governance framework through broader representation and enhanced independent oversight.


Members’ Profile

Sheikh Afzaal Ahmed, a seasoned businessman, oversees and manages the all operational aspects of the Company. With over 43 years of experience in the industry, he brings invaluable expertise in strategic decision-making. His knowledge of the textile industry has been integral in shaping the Company's direction and maintaining its competitive edge. Mr. Asad Imdad Sheikh, the son of Sheikh Afzaal Ahmed, is a graduate of Duke University in Durham, North Carolina, USA, where he earned a degree in Marketing and Business Management, with a focus on Social Sciences. With a strong academic background, he has been an essential part of the Company for the past 11 years, contributing to a forward-thinking direction.


Board Effectiveness

The Company does not have a board committee in place, which affects the overall effectiveness of the board. During FY25, four BOD meetings were conducted to discuss the Company's performance, and the attendance of the Board of Directors (BOD) remained strong. The meeting minutes have been formally documented. However, the establishment of a board committee will further enhance the effectiveness of the board


Financial Transparency

M/s Shinewing Hameed Chaudhari and Co., Chartered Accountants are the external auditors of the Company. The Company’s auditors are rated in the "B Category" by the SBP panel of auditors. The auditors have expressed an unqualified opinion on the financial reports for the year ended June 2025.


Management
Organizational Structure

The Company’s organizational structure is designed with distinct functional departments, each led by highly skilled professionals with extensive experience in the textile industry. These department heads bring a wealth of knowledge and expertise, ensuring that each function, whether it be production, marketing, finance, or operations runs efficiently and effectively.


Management Team

Sheikh Afzaal Ahmad is the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of ACL while his son, Mr. Asad Imdad Sheikh, is serving as the Chief Operating Officer (COO). The other two executive directors lead the technical and commercial department. Mr. Mudassar Zubair, the Chief Financial Officer (CFO) has been associated with the Company for over ten years.


Effectiveness

The management meetings are held quarterly to resolve or proactively address any operational issues of the Company.


MIS

To enhance reporting and streamline operations, the Company implemented a fully functional ERP (Enterprise Resource Planning) software in 2021. This system has significantly improved overall efficiency by integrating key business processes across departments, from inventory management to financial reporting. In the coming years, the management intends to install updated dashboards with real-time data access and automated workflows which is expected to facilitate better decision-making, reduce manual errors, and improve communication across the organization.


Control Environment

The Company has maintained a sound quality management system since its inception, with a strong focus on producing premium-quality yarn. To ensure the highest standards, the Company imports raw cotton from reputable sources such as USA and Brazil, among others. Additionally, the Company has an in-house internal audit department for control over its processes and quality standards.


Business Risk
Industry Dynamics

Textile exports of the country reached USD ~681.0mln in FY25 (cotton yarn only), down from USD ~956.0mln in FY24, reflecting a ~28.8% YoY decline in value. In volume terms, yarn exports declined to ~256,000 MT in FY25 from ~353,000 MT in FY24 (~27.5% YoY decrease). China remained the largest export destination, accounting for ~61.9% of total yarn exports in FY25. During FY25, yarn exports contributed ~2.1% to the country’s total exports (FY24: ~3.1%). In FY25, the transition from the final tax regime to the normal tax regime continued to impact export-oriented units, with corporate profits subject to 29% tax along with a super tax of up to 10%, thereby affecting the profitability matrix of the textile value chain.


Relative Position

Alhamd Corporation (Pvt.) Limited is a mid-sized spinning unit and one of textile ventures of the Sheikh family. The total spindles installed in Pakistan's spinning industry are 13.4 mln out of which the Company has 170,472 spindles installed i.e., 1.3%.


Revenues

The Company’s revenue base remains predominantly concentrated in local sales. During FY25, the topline declined to ~PKR 18.5bln from ~PKR 20.9bln in FY24, reflecting a contraction of ~11.4% YoY amid demand rationalization and pricing adjustments. Local sales constituted ~100% of total revenue in FY25 (FY24: ~99.6%), while export sales remained negligible. The Company continues to benefit from a stable customer base in the local market, maintaining long-standing relationships with established textile players, thereby keeping client concentration risk at manageable levels. During 3MFY26, sales were reported at ~PKR 3.1bln, depicting a decline of ~33.4% compared to the corresponding period last year (~PKR 4.6bln in 3MFY25), reflecting subdued volumetric offtake and pricing pressures.


Margins

During FY25, the gross profit margin compressed to ~3.8% (FY24: ~6.7%) due to elevated input costs and pricing constraints. Consequently, PBIT declined sharply to ~PKR 132mln (FY24: ~PKR 822mln). Operating expenses remained largely controlled at ~PKR 713mln (FY24: ~PKR 776mln); however, the impact of lower gross profitability diluted operating performance. Finance costs remained elevated at ~PKR 1.5bln (FY24: ~PKR 1.6bln), keeping pressure on the bottom line. Resultantly, the Company reported a net loss of ~PKR 1.2bln in FY25 compared to a net loss of ~PKR 774mln in FY24. Net profit margin deteriorated to ~-6.4% (FY24: ~-3.7%). During 3MFY26, the Company reported a negative gross margin of ~-1.5% and a net loss of ~PKR217mln, translating into a net margin of ~-7.1%, reflecting continued stress on profitability.


Sustainability

The Company’s new spinning unit (Unit II) is operational with an adequate capacity utilization level. Further, the management plans to install an 8 Mega Watt solar which is expected to become operational by the end of Feb'26.


Financial Risk
Working capital

The Company’s working capital cycle remains a function of inventory and receivable days, with reliance on short-term borrowings. During FY25, the net working capital cycle extended to ~85days compared to ~71 days in FY24, primarily due to higher inventory days (~59 days in FY25 vs ~55 days in FY24) and increased receivable days (~41 days in FY25 vs ~28 days in FY24). In 3MFY26, the net working capital cycle further elongated to ~125 days (FY25: ~85 days), driven by a buildup in inventory (~84 days) and receivables (~62 days), reflecting slower conversion into cash. Short-term trade leverage remained constrained at ~-4.7% in 3MFY26 (FY25: ~-20.5%), highlighting continued dependence on borrowings.


Coverages

During FY25, FCFO declined to ~PKR 805mln from ~PKR 1.4bln in FY24 (~42.7%YoY decline), owing to weaker profitability. Interest coverage (EBITDA/Finance Cost) weakened to ~0.8x (FY24: ~1.1x), while FCFO/Finance Cost stood at ~0.5x (FY24: ~0.9x), indicating stressed debt-servicing capacity. In 3MFY26, coverages remained subdued with EBITDA/Finance Cost at ~1.1x and FCFO/Finance Cost at ~0.8x. Sustained improvement in operating cash flows remains critical for rating stability.


Capitalization

The Company’s debt profile comprises a mix of short-term and long-term borrowings, including conventional facilities and SBP-related schemes. During FY25, total borrowings increased to ~PKR 8.9bln from ~PKR 7.9bln in FY24. Consequently, total leverage rose to ~64.7% (FY24: ~56.7%). Shareholders’ equity declined to ~PKR 5.1bln (FY24: ~PKR 6.3bln) due to accumulated losses. In 3MFY26, total borrowings stood at ~PKR 8.1bln; however, leverage further escalated to ~65.5% owing to erosion in equity (~PKR 4.9bln). The capital structure remains leveraged, with reliance on short-term funding to finance working capital requirements.


 
 

Feb-26

www.pacra.com


(PKR mln)


Sep-25
3M
Jun-25
12M
Jun-24
12M
Jun-23
12M
A. BALANCE SHEET
1. Non-Current Assets 10,218 10,435 11,297 11,396
2. Investments 0 0 0 0
3. Related Party Exposure 2 1 1 2
4. Current Assets 6,636 7,240 6,652 5,869
a. Inventories 2,589 3,070 2,912 3,391
b. Trade Receivables 1,983 2,225 1,933 1,231
5. Total Assets 16,856 17,677 17,950 17,267
6. Current Liabilities 2,087 2,584 2,353 1,685
a. Trade Payables 600 811 688 665
7. Borrowings 8,127 8,923 7,926 7,270
8. Related Party Exposure 1,200 470 340 0
9. Non-Current Liabilities 535 575 1,026 1,219
10. Net Assets 4,908 5,125 6,305 7,094
11. Shareholders' Equity 4,908 5,125 6,305 7,094
B. INCOME STATEMENT
1. Sales 3,077 18,471 20,850 14,005
a. Cost of Good Sold (3,124) (17,775) (19,443) (13,116)
2. Gross Profit (47) 697 1,407 888
a. Operating Expenses (120) (713) (776) (592)
3. Operating Profit (167) (16) 631 297
a. Non Operating Income or (Expense) 163 148 191 145
4. Profit or (Loss) before Interest and Tax (5) 132 822 441
a. Total Finance Cost (224) (1,499) (1,573) (477)
b. Taxation 12 192 (23) (135)
6. Net Income Or (Loss) (217) (1,175) (774) (171)
C. CASH FLOW STATEMENT
a. Free Cash Flows from Operations (FCFO) 177 805 1,406 448
b. Net Cash from Operating Activities before Working Capital Changes (91) (706) (126) 207
c. Changes in Working Capital 205 (312) (127) 139
1. Net Cash provided by Operating Activities 114 (1,018) (253) 345
2. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Investing Activities (6) (138) (766) (4,527)
3. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Financing Activities (67) 1,127 996 4,192
4. Net Cash generated or (Used) during the period 41 (29) (23) 10
D. RATIO ANALYSIS
1. Performance
a. Sales Growth (for the period) -33.4% -11.4% 48.9% 14.4%
b. Gross Profit Margin -1.5% 3.8% 6.7% 6.3%
c. Net Profit Margin -7.1% -6.4% -3.7% -1.2%
d. Cash Conversion Efficiency (FCFO adjusted for Working Capital/Sales) 12.4% 2.7% 6.1% 4.2%
e. Return on Equity [ Net Profit Margin * Asset Turnover * (Total Assets/Shareholders' Equity )] -17.3% -20.6% -11.5% -2.6%
2. Working Capital Management
a. Gross Working Capital (Average Days) 146 100 83 124
b. Net Working Capital (Average Days) 125 85 71 110
c. Current Ratio (Current Assets / Current Liabilities) 3.2 2.8 2.8 3.5
3. Coverages
a. EBITDA / Finance Cost 1.1 0.8 1.1 1.8
b. FCFO / Finance Cost+CMLTB+Excess STB 0.4 0.3 0.6 0.7
c. Debt Payback (Total Borrowings+Excess STB) / (FCFO-Finance Cost) -33.3 -7.2 -35.5 -150.9
4. Capital Structure
a. Total Borrowings / (Total Borrowings+Shareholders' Equity) 65.5% 64.7% 56.7% 50.6%
b. Interest or Markup Payable (Days) 106.6 74.7 73.9 208.4
c. Entity Average Borrowing Rate 9.2% 15.9% 18.1% 8.0%

Feb-26

www.pacra.com

Feb-26

www.pacra.com

  1. Rating Team Statements
    1. Rating is just an opinion about the creditworthiness of the entity and does not constitute a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell any security of the entity rated or to buy, hold, or sell the security rated, as the case may be. (Chapter III; 14-3-(x))
    2. Conflict of Interest
      1. The Rating Team or any of their family members have no interest in this rating (Chapter III; 12-2-(j))
      2. PACRA, the analysts involved in the rating process, and members of its rating committee and their family members do not have any conflict of interest relating to the rating done by them (Chapter III; 12-2-(e) & (k))
      3. The analyst is not a substantial shareholder of the customer being rated by PACRA [Annexure F; d-(ii)]
      4. Explanation: for the purpose of the above clause, the term "family members" shall include only those family members who are dependent on the analyst and members of the rating committee.
  2. Restrictions
    1. No director, officer, or employee of PACRA communicates the information acquired by him for use for rating purposes to any other person, except where required under law to do so. (Chapter III; 10-(5))
    2. PACRA does not disclose or discuss with outside parties or make improper use of the non-public information which has come to its knowledge during a business relationship with the customer. (Chapter III; 10-7-(d))
    3. PACRA does not make proposals or recommendations regarding the activities of rated entities that could impact a credit rating of the entity subject to rating. (Chapter III; 10-7-(k))
  3. Conduct of Business
    1. PACRA fulfills its obligations in a fair, efficient, transparent, and ethical manner and renders high standards of services in performing its functions and obligations. (Chapter III; 11-A-(a))
    2. PACRA uses due care in the preparation of this Rating Report. Our information has been obtained from sources we consider to be reliable, but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. PACRA does not, in every instance, independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing this Rating Report. (Clause 11-(A)(p))
    3. PACRA prohibits its employees and analysts from soliciting money, gifts, or favors from anyone with whom PACRA conducts business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(q))
    4. PACRA ensures before the commencement of the rating process that an analyst or employee has not had a recent employment or other significant business or personal relationship with the rated entity that may cause or may be perceived as causing a conflict of interest. (Chapter III; 11-A-(r))
    5. PACRA maintains the principle of integrity in seeking rating business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(u))
    6. PACRA promptly investigates in the event of misconduct or a breach of the policies, procedures, and controls, and takes appropriate steps to rectify any weaknesses to prevent any recurrence, along with suitable punitive action against the responsible employee(s). (Chapter III; 11-B-(m))
  4. Independence & Conflict of Interest
    1. PACRA receives compensation from the entity being rated or any third party for the rating services it offers. The receipt of this compensation has no influence on PACRA’s opinions or other analytical processes. In all instances, PACRA is committed to preserving the objectivity, integrity, and independence of its ratings. Our relationship is governed by two distinct mandates: i) rating mandate - signed with the entity being rated or issuer of the debt instrument, and ii) fee mandate - signed with the payer, which can be different from the entity.
    2. PACRA does not provide consultancy/advisory services or other services to any of its customers or their associated companies and associated undertakings that are being rated or have been rated by it during the preceding three years, unless it has an adequate mechanism in place ensuring that the provision of such services does not lead to a conflict of interest situation with its rating activities. (Chapter III; 12-2-(d))
    3. PACRA discloses that no shareholder directly or indirectly holding 10% or more of the share capital of PACRA also holds directly or indirectly 10% or more of the share capital of the entity which is subject to rating or the entity which issued the instrument subject to rating by PACRA. (Chapter III; 12-2-(f))
    4. PACRA ensures that the rating assigned to an entity or instrument is not affected by the existence of a business relationship between PACRA and the entity or any other party, or the non-existence of such a relationship. (Chapter III; 12-2-(i))
    5. PACRA ensures that the analysts or any of their family members shall not buy, sell, or engage in any transaction in any security which falls in the analyst’s area of primary analytical responsibility. This clause, however, does not apply to investments in securities through collective investment schemes. (Chapter III; 12-2-(l))
    6. PACRA has established policies and procedures governing investments and trading in securities by its employees and for monitoring the same to prevent insider trading, market manipulation, or any other market abuse. (Chapter III; 11-B-(g))
  5. Monitoring and Review
    1. PACRA monitors all the outstanding ratings continuously, and any potential change therein due to any event associated with the issuer, the security arrangement, the industry, etc., is disseminated to the market immediately and in an effective manner after appropriate consultation with the entity/issuer. (Chapter III; 17-(a))
    2. PACRA reviews all the outstanding ratings periodically on an annual basis. Provided that public dissemination of annual review and in an instance of change in rating will be made. (Chapter III; 17-(b))
    3. PACRA initiates an immediate review of the outstanding rating upon becoming aware of any information that may reasonably be expected to result in downgrading of the rating. (Chapter III; 17-(c))
    4. PACRA engages with the issuer and the debt securities trustee to remain updated on all information pertaining to the rating of the entity/instrument. (Chapter III; 17-(d))
  6. Probability of Default
    1. PACRA’s Rating Scale reflects the expectation of credit risk. The highest rating has the lowest relative likelihood of default (i.e., probability). PACRA’s transition studies capture the historical performance behavior of a specific rating notch. Transition behavior of the assigned rating can be obtained from PACRA’s Transition Study available at our website. (www.pacra.com) However, the actual transition of rating may not follow the pattern observed in the past. (Chapter III; 14-3(f)(vii))
  7. Proprietary Information
    1. All information contained herein is considered proprietary by PACRA. Hence, none of the information in this document can be copied or otherwise reproduced, stored, or disseminated in whole or in part in any form or by any means whatsoever by any person without PACRA’s prior written consent.

Feb-26

www.pacra.com