Rating History
Dissemination Date Long-Term Rating Short-Term Rating Outlook Action Rating Watch
13-Feb-26 BBB A2 Positive Maintain -
14-Feb-25 BBB A2 Positive Maintain -
16-Feb-24 BBB A2 Positive Maintain -
20-Feb-23 BBB A2 Stable Maintain -
21-Feb-22 BBB A2 Stable Maintain -
About the Entity

Sindh Abadgars Sugar Mills Limited, incorporated in 1984, is a public listed company engaged in the manufacture and sale of sugar and its by-products. Originally owned by the Effendi Group, majority control was acquired by the Essarani Family in 2005, who now hold about 79% of the shares. Other key shareholders include the Islamic Development Bank (~9%) and Financial Institutions (~2.4%), with the balance held by the public. The Company is led by CEO Dr. Tara Chand.

Rating Rationale

The ratings of Sindh Abadgars Sugar Mills Limited (SASML) reflects its presence in the sugar industry and supported by its strategic affiliation with the well-established DM United Group, which provides strategic guidance, and sector expertise. Operationally, the company faced a challenging year (MY2025) as limited sugarcane availability led to a reduction in net crushing days and overall throughput, subsequently lowering sugar production volumes. However, SASML demonstrated financial resilience; despite the volume dip, total revenue grew by 7.5% driven by improved average selling prices coupled with increasing export volumes, which rose to 12% of the sales mix. This topline growth, combined with competitive sugarcane procurement costs, bolstered gross margins. Furthermore, a significant reduction in finance costs, stemming from both a declining policy rate and optimized credit line utilization served as a primary catalyst for a bottom-line turnaround, shifting the net margin from a negative 5.1% in the previous year to a positive 2.3% reflecting in the "Positive Outlook". Furthermore, Capital structure also showed positive movement as leveraging declined to 34.2% from 41.2%. Looking ahead, the operating environment remains challenging. Competitive raw material cost pressures could constrain margins, cash flow generation, and liquidity. Governance and management continue to be critical strengths for the Company. Anchored by the Essarani family’s strategic oversight, the leadership team leverages decades of expertise to steer the Company through evolving industry dynamics.

Key Rating Drivers

The ratings are dependent on the Company’s ability to maintain healthy operating margins and disciplined working capital management. Going forward, any material changes in operating margins, working capital discipline, leveraging, or coverage metrics and market positioning are likely to be reflected in the ratings.

Profile
Legal Structure

Sindh Abadgars Sugar Mills Limited (“SASML” or “the Company”) is a public listed company incorporated in Pakistan on January 28, 1984, under the then-applicable Companies Ordinance, 1984, which was subsequently repealed with the enactment of the Companies Act, 2017, on May 30, 2017. The shares of the Company are listed on the Pakistan Stock Exchange Limited. The principal activity of the Company is the manufacture and sale of white sugar.


Background

The Company was incorporated in Karachi, Pakistan, on January 28, 1984, originally under the ownership of the Effendi Group. In 2005, control of the Company was transferred to the Essarani Family, who have managed its operations and oversight ever since.


Operations

The Company is primarily engaged in the manufacturing and sale of white refined crystal sugar, along with the production of key by products, including bagasse, utilized for energy generation and as a raw material for various industries, and molasses, which is used in the production of ethanol. The Company has an installed sugarcane crushing capacity of 8,000 metric tons per day, and its production facility is located in Tando Mohammed Khan, Sindh. During the MY24-25 crushing season, the Company operated for 95 gross days, compared to 87 gross days in the previous season. Despite the longer crushing period, net crushing days declined to 74 from 85, primarily due to cane availability constraints and operational stoppages. Total sugarcane crushed during the season stood at 405,205 tons, reflecting a decline of ~22% compared to 521,657 tons crushed in the preceding season. Consequently, average daily crushing reduced to 4,265 tons on gross days and 5,452 tons on net days, compared to 5,996 tons and 6,137 tons, respectively, in the previous season. The reduction in throughput primarily reflects lower cane availability and a shorter effective crushing duration.  while sugar recovery decreased to 9.9% percent from 10.9% in the previous season. Molasses production amounted to 18,800 tons, compared to 23,320 tons last season, in line with the decline in cane crushing volumes. Overall, the Company’s operational performance was adversely affected by lower sugarcane availability, resulting in reduced crushing and sugar production volumes.


Ownership
Ownership Structure

The Essarani Family holds the majority shareholding in Sindh Abadgars Sugar Mills Limited, owning ~79% of the total shares. Financial institutions collectively hold ~2% of the shareholding, while foreign investors, with the Islamic Development Bank being a prominent participant, account for ~9%. The general public holds the remaining ~10% of the Company’s shares.


Stability

The Essarani family’s majority control, combined with the limited presence of outside investors, provides a strong foundation for continuity of operations. This ownership stability supports long-term operational consistency and fosters confidence among key stakeholders. While there is no formalized succession plan, the roles and responsibilities of family members within the Company are clearly defined.


Business Acumen

The Essarani Family brings extensive experience in the agricultural sector, operating under the umbrella of the DM United Group. The Group maintains a diversified portfolio spanning multiple industries, with key assets including Sindh Abadgars Sugar Mills. In addition, the family’s holdings extend to United Ethanol Industries Limited, a significant player in ethanol production, as well as Agro Trade Private Limited, United Agro Chemicals, SGM Sugar Mills (Pvt.) Limited, Ranipur Sugar Mills (Pvt.) Limited, and Synergy Packaging (Pvt.) Limited, further reinforcing the Group’s presence across the agricultural and chemical sectors.


Financial Strength

The Company demonstrates adequate financial strength, supported by its position within the DM United Group and the strong backing of its sponsors. The Essarani Family’s majority ownership provides both strategic guidance and financial support, which enhances the Company’s ability to manage working capital requirements and fund ongoing operations.


Governance
Board Structure

The Board of SASML comprises of ten members with a diverse composition. This includes five non-executive directors, two executive directors, and three independent directors. The Board has nine male members and one female representative. The Essarani Family, as the principal sponsor, exerts significant influence over the Board, holding seven of the ten seats, thereby ensuring strong representation in strategic and operational decision-making. The Board structure combines family oversight with independent and non-executive participation, supporting governance while reflecting the ownership profile of the Company.


Members’ Profile

Mr. Deoo Mal Essarani, Chairman of the Board, also chairs SGM Sugar Mills Limited and United Ethanol Industries Limited. The non-executive directors are Mr. Deoo Mal Essarni, Mr. Dileep Kumar, Mr. Jugdesh Kumar, Mr. Mohan Lal, and Dr. Besham Kumar. The executive directors are Dr. Tara Chand Essarani and Mr. Mahesh Kumar, while the independent directors are Mr. Zafar Ahmed Ghori, Mr. M. Siddiq Khokhar, and Ms. Maheshwari Osha.


Board Effectiveness

The Board of Directors of the Company has established two key sub-committees to strengthen governance and oversight. The Audit Committee is responsible for overseeing the financial reporting process, ensuring the accuracy and integrity of financial statements, reviewing internal controls, and monitoring compliance with legal and regulatory requirements. The HR and Remuneration Committee focuses on the Company’s human resources strategy, including talent management, executive compensation, and organizational development, ensuring that HR practices are aligned with corporate objectives and comply with relevant regulations. Collectively, these committees play a crucial role in promoting transparency, accountability, and strategic alignment within the organization. At present, the Company has not constituted a separate Nomination Committee. Matters relating to nominations, Board composition, and committee structures are addressed directly by the Board on the recommendation of the HR and Remuneration Committee, in line with its approved terms of reference. Similarly, a separate Risk Management Committee has not been established. Oversight of the Company’s risk management framework, including financial, operational, and compliance controls, is currently performed by the Audit Committee in accordance with its approved terms of reference. The Audit Committee regularly evaluates the adequacy and effectiveness of risk management procedures and reports its findings and recommendations to the Board.


Financial Transparency

The Company's auditors, M/s Rahman Sarfaraz Rahim Iqbal Rafiq, issued an unqualified opinion on the financial statements for MY25. The firm comes under category 'A' as designated by the SBP.


Management
Organizational Structure

The Company’s organizational structure is divided into two main segments: mill operations, overseen by the Resident Director, and head-office administration, managed by the Group Chief Financial Officer (CFO). Both report directly to the Chief Executive Officer (CEO). Specialized departments under the CFO include Administration and Sales, Finance and Tax, Purchase, and Corporate Affairs, all of which report directly to the CFO, ensuring a clear line of authority and streamlined operational and administrative oversight.


Management Team

Dr. Tara Chand, Chief Executive Officer, brings over 17 years of experience in the sugar and allied industries. In addition to his role as CEO of the Company, he also serves as CEO of United Ethanol Industries. Dr. Chand is supported by a competent leadership team, including Mr. Abdul Rahim Mallah, Resident Director Mills, and Mr. Saqib Ghaffar, Group Director Finance. Collectively, the senior management team comprises seasoned professionals with extensive experience in the sugar industry, providing effective leadership and strategic direction to the Company.


Effectiveness

The Company does not currently maintain formally established management committees. However, the management team conducts regular performance discussions to assess and review ongoing activities. These discussions enable the leadership to monitor progress, address operational challenges, and ensure alignment with the Company’s strategic objectives.


MIS

The Company has implemented Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) software from Cosmosoft to streamline its operations and enhance efficiency. This software helps integrate various business processes, providing a centralized system for managing key functions such as inventory, production, finance, and human resources.


Control Environment

The internal audit function is currently centralized at the Group level. Going forward, the Group plans to strengthen its control environment by expanding the internal audit team, adding personnel to enhance oversight, and improving the effectiveness of internal controls across the organization.


Business Risk
Industry Dynamics

Sugar production across Pakistan for the 2025-26 crushing season has commenced nationwide, with initial indicators suggesting an improvement in sucrose recovery compared to the previous season, supported by favorable climatic conditions and enhanced cane quality. Preliminary estimates indicate an upside in average recovery of approximately 0.5%, which could enable the industry to reach the national average recovery level of 10%, driven by higher sucrose content in cane and improved agronomic practices at the farm level. In addition, the area under sugarcane cultivation and yield per acre are projected to improve marginally, and the combined effect of higher recovery rates and increased cane availability is expected to result in higher overall sugar production volumes, potentially surpassing last year’s output. Overall, the industry outlook for the ongoing season remains cautiously optimistic, underpinned by improved operational efficiencies and supportive agricultural inputs.


Relative Position

The Company contributed ~1% to total sugar production in Pakistan, reflecting its modest share in the national industry.


Revenues

The Company’s topline recorded a year-on-year growth of ~7.5%, increasing from ~PKR 5,766 million in MY24 to ~PKR 6,196 million in MY25. This growth was primarily driven by higher average selling prices, which more than offset the impact of largely stable sales volumes. Domestic sales remained the dominant contributor, accounting for ~88% of total revenue, while exports comprised the ~12%. The revenue expansion underscores the Company’s ability to pass on a portion of elevated input costs in a relatively tight domestic supply environment, supported by industry-wide price rationalization during the period. In addition, the Company generated ancillary income from by-products, with bagasse contributing ~PKR 98 million and molasses ~PKR 572 million, providing incremental support to overall revenues and diversifying the income base.


Margins

SASML’s profitability profile improved significantly in MY25, supported by favorable pricing dynamics amid lower sugar production in Pakistan. The gross profit margin expanded to ~9.5%, up from ~3.5% in MY24, translating into a substantial improvement at the operating level. The operating profit margin increased to ~6.4% from ~0.6%, while the PBIT margin strengthened to ~7.8% from ~2.6%, reflecting enhanced operating leverage. Consequently, the Company returned to profitability at the bottom line, with the net profit margin recovering to ~2.3% in MY25 from a net loss margin of ~5.1% in MY24, supported by improved operating performance and relatively contained finance costs. Overall, net income rebounded sharply to ~PKR 140 million, following a net loss of ~PKR 296 million in MY24, marking a significant turnaround in profitability.


Sustainability

SASML’s profitability profile improved significantly in MY25, supported by favorable pricing dynamics amid lower sugar production in Pakistan. The gross profit margin expanded to ~9.5%, up from ~3.5% in MY24, translating into a substantial improvement at the operating level. The operating profit margin increased to ~6.4% from ~0.6%, while the PBIT margin strengthened to ~7.8% from ~2.6%, reflecting enhanced operating leverage. Consequently, the Company returned to profitability at the bottom line, with the net profit margin recovering to ~2.3% in MY25 from a net loss margin of ~5.1% in MY24, supported by improved operating performance and relatively contained finance costs. Overall, net income rebounded sharply to ~PKR 140 million, following a net loss of ~PKR 296 million in MY24, marking a significant turnaround in profitability.


Financial Risk
Working capital

The Company’s working capital cycle lengthened moderately in MY25, driven by higher inventory holdings and an increase in receivables. Average inventory days rose to ~88 from ~82 in MY24, reflecting elevated stock levels in line with production and sales dynamics. In addition, average trade receivable days increased to ~9 from ~2, indicating a modest elongation in collection cycles. Consequently, average gross working capital days expanded to ~97 in MY25, compared to ~84 in the preceding year. This increase was only partially mitigated by a marginal contraction in supplier credit, with average trade payable days declining slightly to ~16 from ~17. As a result, average net working capital days increased to ~81 in MY25 from ~67 in MY24, pointing to a higher level of capital being tied up in operations and exerting incremental pressure on liquidity during the period.


Coverages

The Company’s debt-servicing capacity improved markedly in MY25, underpinned by a strong recovery in operating performance. EBITDA-to-finance cost coverage increased to ~2.9x in MY25 from a weak ~0.5x in MY24, indicating a materially enhanced ability to service finance charges from operating earnings. This improvement is further supported by a sharp turnaround in cash flow generation, with FCFO growth rebounding to ~1,283.3% in MY25 following a contraction of ~96.6% in MY24. As a result, overall coverage metrics strengthened meaningfully: interest coverage and core operating coverage improved to ~2.1x in MY25 from ~0.1x in MY24, while total operating coverage rose to ~2.2x from ~0.1x. These trends reflect a transition from previously stressed coverage levels to moderate, though still evolving, debt-servicing comfort.


Capitalization

SASML’s capital structure exhibited improvement in MY25, as leverage declined to ~34.2% from ~41.2% in MY24, reflecting a reduction in reliance on debt amid improved profitability and internal cash generation. The composition of borrowings also improved, with short-term borrowings comprising ~65.8% of total debt compared to ~69.7% previously, indicating a gradual shift toward a more balanced maturity profile. Additionally, interest payable days reduced to ~20.9 from ~50.5, highlighting enhanced liquidity management and improved timeliness in servicing finance obligations, which collectively underscore a strengthening capital structure and reduced refinancing risk.


 
 

Feb-26

www.pacra.com


(PKR mln)


Sep-25
12M
Sep-24
12M
Sep-23
12M
Audited Audited Audited
A. BALANCE SHEET
1. Non-Current Assets 4,382 4,548 3,018
2. Investments 0 0 0
3. Related Party Exposure 0 0 0
4. Current Assets 2,275 2,248 1,372
a. Inventories 1,239 1,753 842
b. Trade Receivables 244 68 0
5. Total Assets 6,656 6,795 4,390
6. Current Liabilities 1,212 1,057 781
a. Trade Payables 304 251 290
7. Borrowings 923 1,311 146
8. Related Party Exposure 480 480 480
9. Non-Current Liabilities 1,344 1,391 922
10. Net Assets 2,697 2,557 2,061
11. Shareholders' Equity 2,697 2,557 2,061
B. INCOME STATEMENT
1. Sales 6,196 5,766 5,535
a. Cost of Good Sold (5,607) (5,562) (4,401)
2. Gross Profit 589 204 1,133
a. Operating Expenses (189) (171) (151)
3. Operating Profit 399 33 982
a. Non Operating Income or (Expense) 86 119 11
4. Profit or (Loss) before Interest and Tax 485 152 993
a. Total Finance Cost (260) (573) (384)
b. Taxation (85) 124 (236)
6. Net Income Or (Loss) 140 (296) 373
C. CASH FLOW STATEMENT
a. Free Cash Flows from Operations (FCFO) 545 39 1,164
b. Net Cash from Operating Activities before Working Capital Changes 237 (452) 742
c. Changes in Working Capital 456 (702) 426
1. Net Cash provided by Operating Activities 693 (1,154) 1,168
2. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Investing Activities (81) (92) (55)
3. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Financing Activities (136) 673 (655)
4. Net Cash generated or (Used) during the period 476 (574) 458
D. RATIO ANALYSIS
1. Performance
a. Sales Growth (for the period) 7.5% 4.2% 42.9%
b. Gross Profit Margin 9.5% 3.5% 20.5%
c. Net Profit Margin 2.3% -5.1% 6.7%
d. Cash Conversion Efficiency (FCFO adjusted for Working Capital/Sales) 16.2% -11.5% 28.7%
e. Return on Equity [ Net Profit Margin * Asset Turnover * (Total Assets/Shareholders' Equity )] 5.3% -12.8% 19.9%
2. Working Capital Management
a. Gross Working Capital (Average Days) 97 84 73
b. Net Working Capital (Average Days) 81 67 54
c. Current Ratio (Current Assets / Current Liabilities) 1.9 2.1 1.8
3. Coverages
a. EBITDA / Finance Cost 2.9 0.5 3.2
b. FCFO / Finance Cost+CMLTB+Excess STB 2.1 0.1 2.5
c. Debt Payback (Total Borrowings+Excess STB) / (FCFO-Finance Cost) 1.7 -1.1 0.8
4. Capital Structure
a. Total Borrowings / (Total Borrowings+Shareholders' Equity) 34.2% 41.2% 23.3%
b. Interest or Markup Payable (Days) 20.9 50.5 22.7
c. Entity Average Borrowing Rate 10.4% 20.9% 17.3%

Feb-26

www.pacra.com

Feb-26

www.pacra.com

  1. Rating Team Statements
    1. Rating is just an opinion about the creditworthiness of the entity and does not constitute a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell any security of the entity rated or to buy, hold, or sell the security rated, as the case may be. (Chapter III; 14-3-(x))
    2. Conflict of Interest
      1. The Rating Team or any of their family members have no interest in this rating (Chapter III; 12-2-(j))
      2. PACRA, the analysts involved in the rating process, and members of its rating committee and their family members do not have any conflict of interest relating to the rating done by them (Chapter III; 12-2-(e) & (k))
      3. The analyst is not a substantial shareholder of the customer being rated by PACRA [Annexure F; d-(ii)]
      4. Explanation: for the purpose of the above clause, the term "family members" shall include only those family members who are dependent on the analyst and members of the rating committee.
  2. Restrictions
    1. No director, officer, or employee of PACRA communicates the information acquired by him for use for rating purposes to any other person, except where required under law to do so. (Chapter III; 10-(5))
    2. PACRA does not disclose or discuss with outside parties or make improper use of the non-public information which has come to its knowledge during a business relationship with the customer. (Chapter III; 10-7-(d))
    3. PACRA does not make proposals or recommendations regarding the activities of rated entities that could impact a credit rating of the entity subject to rating. (Chapter III; 10-7-(k))
  3. Conduct of Business
    1. PACRA fulfills its obligations in a fair, efficient, transparent, and ethical manner and renders high standards of services in performing its functions and obligations. (Chapter III; 11-A-(a))
    2. PACRA uses due care in the preparation of this Rating Report. Our information has been obtained from sources we consider to be reliable, but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. PACRA does not, in every instance, independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing this Rating Report. (Clause 11-(A)(p))
    3. PACRA prohibits its employees and analysts from soliciting money, gifts, or favors from anyone with whom PACRA conducts business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(q))
    4. PACRA ensures before the commencement of the rating process that an analyst or employee has not had a recent employment or other significant business or personal relationship with the rated entity that may cause or may be perceived as causing a conflict of interest. (Chapter III; 11-A-(r))
    5. PACRA maintains the principle of integrity in seeking rating business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(u))
    6. PACRA promptly investigates in the event of misconduct or a breach of the policies, procedures, and controls, and takes appropriate steps to rectify any weaknesses to prevent any recurrence, along with suitable punitive action against the responsible employee(s). (Chapter III; 11-B-(m))
  4. Independence & Conflict of Interest
    1. PACRA receives compensation from the entity being rated or any third party for the rating services it offers. The receipt of this compensation has no influence on PACRA’s opinions or other analytical processes. In all instances, PACRA is committed to preserving the objectivity, integrity, and independence of its ratings. Our relationship is governed by two distinct mandates: i) rating mandate - signed with the entity being rated or issuer of the debt instrument, and ii) fee mandate - signed with the payer, which can be different from the entity.
    2. PACRA does not provide consultancy/advisory services or other services to any of its customers or their associated companies and associated undertakings that are being rated or have been rated by it during the preceding three years, unless it has an adequate mechanism in place ensuring that the provision of such services does not lead to a conflict of interest situation with its rating activities. (Chapter III; 12-2-(d))
    3. PACRA discloses that no shareholder directly or indirectly holding 10% or more of the share capital of PACRA also holds directly or indirectly 10% or more of the share capital of the entity which is subject to rating or the entity which issued the instrument subject to rating by PACRA. (Chapter III; 12-2-(f))
    4. PACRA ensures that the rating assigned to an entity or instrument is not affected by the existence of a business relationship between PACRA and the entity or any other party, or the non-existence of such a relationship. (Chapter III; 12-2-(i))
    5. PACRA ensures that the analysts or any of their family members shall not buy, sell, or engage in any transaction in any security which falls in the analyst’s area of primary analytical responsibility. This clause, however, does not apply to investments in securities through collective investment schemes. (Chapter III; 12-2-(l))
    6. PACRA has established policies and procedures governing investments and trading in securities by its employees and for monitoring the same to prevent insider trading, market manipulation, or any other market abuse. (Chapter III; 11-B-(g))
  5. Monitoring and Review
    1. PACRA monitors all the outstanding ratings continuously, and any potential change therein due to any event associated with the issuer, the security arrangement, the industry, etc., is disseminated to the market immediately and in an effective manner after appropriate consultation with the entity/issuer. (Chapter III; 17-(a))
    2. PACRA reviews all the outstanding ratings periodically on an annual basis. Provided that public dissemination of annual review and in an instance of change in rating will be made. (Chapter III; 17-(b))
    3. PACRA initiates an immediate review of the outstanding rating upon becoming aware of any information that may reasonably be expected to result in downgrading of the rating. (Chapter III; 17-(c))
    4. PACRA engages with the issuer and the debt securities trustee to remain updated on all information pertaining to the rating of the entity/instrument. (Chapter III; 17-(d))
  6. Probability of Default
    1. PACRA’s Rating Scale reflects the expectation of credit risk. The highest rating has the lowest relative likelihood of default (i.e., probability). PACRA’s transition studies capture the historical performance behavior of a specific rating notch. Transition behavior of the assigned rating can be obtained from PACRA’s Transition Study available at our website. (www.pacra.com) However, the actual transition of rating may not follow the pattern observed in the past. (Chapter III; 14-3(f)(vii))
  7. Proprietary Information
    1. All information contained herein is considered proprietary by PACRA. Hence, none of the information in this document can be copied or otherwise reproduced, stored, or disseminated in whole or in part in any form or by any means whatsoever by any person without PACRA’s prior written consent.

Feb-26

www.pacra.com