Rating History
Dissemination Date Long-Term Rating Short-Term Rating Outlook Action Rating Watch
25-Jul-25 AA A1+ Stable Maintain -
26-Jul-24 AA A1+ Stable Maintain -
27-Jul-23 AA A1+ Stable Maintain -
29-Jul-22 AA A1+ Stable Maintain -
29-Jul-21 AA A1+ Stable Maintain -
About the Entity

EFert was incorporated in 2009 as a listed company with a primary objective of manufacturing and marketing urea and other fertilizers. The Company has three production facilities, with the designed annual capacity of the base plant at 975,000 MT, Enven is 1,300,000 MT, and NPK is 100,000 MT. While DAP is imported. EFert is majorly (~56.3%) owned by Engro Holdings through Engro Corporation Ltd., while insurance companies hold ~8.3%, followed by mutual funds (~2.2%) and financial institutions (~1.8%). The general public holds ~20.9% stake. Mr. Ahsan Zafar Syed chairs the Board, while Mr. Ali Rathore heads the Company as the CEO.

Rating Rationale

Engro Fertilizers Limited's (‘Efert’ or ‘the Company’) ratings reflect strong sponsorship of the company: Engro Holdings, which is one of Pakistan’s leading groups, has a strategically diversified business portfolio. EFert benefits from a strong business model underpinned by the inherent strength of its products and operational efficacy. The ratings incorporate the low business risk profile of the fertilizer industry, reinforced by the growing strategic importance of food security in the evolved global scenario. Urea is one of the major inputs to crops produced in Pakistan, followed by DAP. In CY24, the quarterly sales analysis of the Company depicted a rising trend of turnover and improved margins, especially in 4Q. The 2Q was the lowest in profitability. Nevertheless, the overall profits were maintained in 2024 in an absolute sense. In 1QCY25, reported turnover and margins reflected dilution, attributable to muted demand. The reported inventory levels in 1QCY25 were high, generally across the industry, and more so for EFert. The management has represented that this is a seasonal impact and it would get settled over the next six months, along with the privately placed short-term Sukuk recently issued by the Company. EFert has sustained high operational efficiency through continuous investments in plant optimization, translating into higher utilization capability and extended operational run times. EFert has a sound financial structure, characterized by the fundamental nature of the underlying sector. The strain on the financial metrics in the recent period is noticeable, which, as per management projections, would subside in the coming quarters, based on the anticipated rise in sales. The higher utilization of short-term borrowings is attributed to this phenomenon. The privately placed short-term Sukuk is expected to provide financial flexibility, given the prevailing market conditions. Cash flow generation was very strong in CY24, and with this capability, managing the current fiscal pressure is not a major challenge. Hence, the future anticipated sales pattern remains imperative. Profit margins are largely influenced by the spread between fertilizer prices and natural gas costs, making cost volatility a significant risk factor. EFert's capital structure remains moderately leveraged due to an uptick in long-term borrowings, which is in line with industry dynamics. Hence, the management of short-term debt seems essential.

Key Rating Drivers

The ratings remain dependent upon the Company’s ability to sustain its healthy business profile amidst strong competition; herein, effective and prudent management of financial risk indicators remains important.

Profile
Legal Structure

Engro Fertilizers Limited (“EFert” or “the Company”) is a public listed company, incorporated in 2009.


Background

Continual expansions and diversifications in the Company’s enterprises necessitated a broad restructuring of Engro Chemical Pakistan Ltd., which demerged to form a new Engro subsidiary – Engro Fertilizers Limited. The shareholding was gradually reduced from 100% as part of a strategic realignment to explore new opportunities in other promising sectors.


Operations

EFert, a leading name in the country’s urea producers, is primarily in the business of manufacturing and marketing urea and deals in other fertilizers. The product line of EFert comprises Urea sold under the brand name Engro Urea, NPK – complex fertilizer – as Zarkhez, Phosphate-based products – DAP and MAP as Engro DAP, and Zorawar respectively, and zinc-based fertilizers as Zingro. The Company has three production facilities, out of which two are Urea plants located in Daharki (Base and Enven Plant) and one is an NPK plant in Port Qasim, Karachi. The total designed capacity of EFert’s urea plants – base plant: 975,000 MT per annum and Enven: 1,300,000 MT per annum. NPK has a total capacity of 100,000 MT. DAP is imported. EFert has a strong countrywide distribution network.


Ownership
Ownership Structure

EFert is majorly (~56.3%) owned by Engro Holdings through Engro Corporation Ltd., while insurance companies hold ~8.29%, followed by mutual funds (~2.20%) and financial institutions (~1.81%). The general public holds ~20.90%.


Stability

The ownership structure of the Company is seen as stable in the foreseeable future, as the majority of shareholding vests with the sponsors through Engro Holdings.


Business Acumen

EFert's business acumen is characterized by its strategic foresight, operational efficiency, innovation in product development, and commitment to sustainability and corporate responsibility.


Financial Strength

The Company gathers financial strength through a consolidated equity base of ~PKR 47bln (CY23: ~PKR 48bln) with an asset base of ~PKR 170bln (CY23: ~PKR 160bln).


Governance
Board Structure

The control of the Board (BoD) vests with the eight-members, including four Non-Executive Directors, three Independent Directors, including one female Director, and one Executive Director.


Members’ Profile

The Company’s Board is chaired by Mr. Ahsan Zafar Syed. He is the CEO of Engro Corporation Ltd., with an association of over three decades with the Group. Mr. Asad Said Jafar, Non-Executive Director, holds more than three decades of professional experience. He has held the position of the CEO and BoDs chairman of Philips Pakistan Ltd., and has also worked in ICI Pakistan. He currently works as a management consultant. All other members on the BoD have diversified experience and have been associated with the Company's BoD for a long span of time. T


Board Effectiveness

The Board is assisted by the Audit Committee and People Committee. Both committees are chaired by an Independent Director. These committees meet quarterly, and the minutes of these meetings are well documented. 


Financial Transparency

A.F. Ferguson & Co., Chartered Accountants, has given an unqualified opinion on the financial statements for CY24. The auditor is QCR-rated and on SBP panel of 'A' category.


Management
Organizational Structure

The Company has a well-defined organizational structure that is divided into fourteen main departments; (i) Marketing, (ii) Manufacturing, (iii) People Division, (iv) Digital Transformation, (v) Finance & Accounting, (vi) HSE, (vii) Information Technology, (viii) Engro Formulation, (ix) Public Affairs, (x) Central Procurement, (xi) Cenetral Treasury, (xii) Central Payables, (xiii) Operations and (xiv) Technical. Each departmental Head reports to the Chief Executive Officer (CEO), who then reports to the BoD. However, the Head of Internal Audit and HR reports administratively to the CEO and functionally to the respective BoD Committee. The Head of the Board Audit Committee has an indirect reporting line to the Head of Corporate Audit of Engro Holdings.


Management Team

Mr. Ali Rathore was appointed as the CEO of the Company in Apr-24. He has an overall experience of 26 years in financial planning & analysis, business development, operations, and M&A, with a diverse industry background. Mr. M. Imran Khalil, Chief Financial Officer (CFO), has been associated with Engro Group for more than a decade. He is a seasoned finance professional with experience in large-scale digital transformation, risk management, and project management. He is assisted by a team of professionals.


Effectiveness

The management is assisted by four committees, i.e., Management Committee, Pricing Committee, Corporate HSE Committee, and Capex Committee. These committees are chaired by the CEO, and meetings of the committee are held on a periodic basis to ensure efficiency and strategic planning.


MIS

EFert utilizes a completely integrated and real-time ERP solution, developed by SAP AG Malaysia, with technical services provided by IBM Global Services. The ERP enables a high level of integration between functions to ensure smoother data flow amongst related business processes.


Control Environment

EFert maintains an effective control environment with clear reporting lines, predefined authority limits, and well-defined policies and procedures. The review and accountability function runs through the entire organizational structure.


Business Risk
Industry Dynamics

The Fertilizers industry is oligopolistic, dominated by three players, i.e., Fauji (post FFC and FFBL merger in Dec-24). Engro and Fatima. Urea and DAP remain the primary fertilizers by volume. While Pakistan is self-sufficient in Urea, gas shortages necessitate Urea imports (~0.2mln MT in CY24). DAP is largely imported, as FFBL is the only local manufacturer. Total fertilizer production averaged ~9.1mln MT (CY20-24) vs offtake of ~9.9mln MT. In CY24, production rose ~6.9% YoY, while offtake dipped ~1.1% YoY. Urea led production (~53.6%), while Urea and DAP formed ~65.6% and ~16.2% of the total offtake, respectively. DAP imports surged ~80.4% in CY24, likely driven by Punjab’s Kissan Card Scheme of ~PKR 75bln. Overall, the sector's outlook remains stable.


Relative Position

EFert has been significantly contributing to the urea market (~31%) and is the second largest player in the fertilizer industry.


Revenues

The Company’s urea production stood at ~2,147 KT in CY24 (CY23: ~2,313 KT). In CY24, standalone revenue stood at ~PKR 187bln (CY23: ~PKR 162bln), achieving a sales growth of ~15.5%. This increase is primarily due to price impact as the sales volume of urea decreased to ~2,026 KT (CY23: ~2,327 KT). In 1QCY25, the Company witnessed a sharp decline of ~55% in revenue reported at ~PKR 24.3bln (1QCY24: ~PKR 53.8bln) due to a reduction in demand for fertilizers.


Margins

In CY24, gross profit margins declined to ~33% (CY23: ~37%), due to the treatment of imported urea. Similarly, operating margins declined to ~22% (CY23: 27%) due to a significant increase in selling and marketing expenses. However, the net profit margin improved slightly to ~16.2% (CY23: ~15.9%) due to the inflow of non-operating income along with tax efficiencies. During 1QCY25, gross margin witnessed an improvement reported at ~41% (1QCY24: ~24%). The Company's ability to control marketing and selling expenses resulted in an improved operating margin of ~24% (1QCY24: ~15%). The effect trickled down, and the net profit margin was reported at ~16.2% (1QCY24: ~10.7%).


Sustainability

The Company continues to explore new avenues, particularly in pesticides and agri-farming sectors, which are expected to yield positive results in the long run. Moreover, the Company is actively evaluating alternate sources of gas with the Government to mitigate the risk of depleting gas reserves.


Financial Risk
Working capital

As of CY24, inventory days increased slightly to ~17 days (CY23: ~16 days) due to an increase in finished goods days. Trade receivable days increased to ~8 days (CY23: ~7 days), leading to a gross working capital of ~25 days (CY23: ~22 days). However, net working capital days remained stable at ~6 days (CY23: ~6 days) due to an increase in trade payable days to ~19 days (CY23: ~16 days). However, the borrowing cushion remains stretched. As of 1QCY25, gross working capital days increased significantly to ~86 days (1QCY24: ~15 days), due to an increase in finished goods days reported at ~54 days (1QCY24: ~2 days), demonstrating lower fertilizer demand. In 1QCY25, inventory levels remain elevated across the industry, particularly at EFert. This is attributed to seasonal factors, expecting normalization over the next six months. Consequently, net working capital days were stretched and reported at ~59 days (1QCY24: (1) day).


Coverages

As of CY24, the Company reported FCFO of ~PKR 12bln (CY23: ~PKR 33bln) due to an increase in taxes paid. Consequently, FCFO/Finance Cost cover is reported at ~3x (CY23: ~17.3x). The FCFO stood at ~PKR 3.5bln (1QCY24: ~PKR 2bln-loss), resulting in FCFO/Finance cover of ~3.4x (1QCY24: (~12.3x)).


Capitalization

The leveraging ratio stood at ~42% (CY23: ~12%) due to a significant increase in borrowings reported at ~PKR 34bln (CY23: ~PKR 6bln). Shareholders equity slightly increased to ~PKR 46bln (CY23: ~PKR 45bln) due to profit accumulation. The leverage ratio increased to ~57% (1QCY24: ~13%) due to an uptick in total borrowings reported at ~PKR 53bln (1QCY24: ~PKR 6bln). Increased reliance on short-term borrowings is tied to the inventory build and the related pressure. While long-term leverage remains low, prudent management of short-term debt is essential. The shareholders' equity has reduced slightly to ~PKR 39bln (1QCY24: ~PKR 43bln) due to dividend payout.


 
 

Jul-25

www.pacra.com


Mar-25
3M
Dec-24
12M
Dec-23
12M
Dec-22
12M
Management Audited Audited Audited
A. BALANCE SHEET
1. Non-Current Assets 87,847 88,343 83,834 83,374
2. Investments 3,868 6,006 23,703 10,657
3. Related Party Exposure 8,966 12,370 2,368 9,944
4. Current Assets 70,159 56,203 37,821 35,801
a. Inventories 25,636 12,205 5,364 8,427
b. Trade Receivables 1,627 5,687 2,069 3,772
5. Total Assets 170,839 162,922 147,727 139,775
6. Current Liabilities 75,885 79,785 85,040 63,939
a. Trade Payables 4,315 10,107 9,441 5,105
7. Borrowings 52,877 33,987 6,305 20,496
8. Related Party Exposure 0 0 0 1,053
9. Non-Current Liabilities 2,301 2,621 11,355 11,599
10. Net Assets 39,775 46,529 45,026 42,690
11. Shareholders' Equity 39,775 46,529 45,026 42,690
B. INCOME STATEMENT
1. Sales 24,313 186,709 161,666 96,945
a. Cost of Good Sold (14,261) (125,171) (102,244) (67,544)
2. Gross Profit 10,052 61,538 59,422 29,401
a. Operating Expenses (4,273) (20,602) (15,707) (10,950)
3. Operating Profit 5,778 40,937 43,715 18,451
a. Non Operating Income or (Expense) 1,177 7,865 3,154 6,752
4. Profit or (Loss) before Interest and Tax 6,956 48,802 46,869 25,204
a. Total Finance Cost (1,070) (3,982) (1,885) (2,699)
b. Taxation (1,957) (14,613) (19,306) (7,096)
6. Net Income Or (Loss) 3,929 30,207 25,678 15,408
C. CASH FLOW STATEMENT
a. Free Cash Flows from Operations (FCFO) 3,588 11,906 32,589 16,244
b. Net Cash from Operating Activities before Working Capital Changes 2,102 9,016 29,819 15,749
c. Changes in Working Capital (18,128) (12,159) 25,296 6,327
1. Net Cash provided by Operating Activities (16,026) (3,143) 55,115 22,077
2. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Investing Activities 5,191 5,451 (13,427) (8,840)
3. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Financing Activities (5,206) (8,862) (33,703) (29,267)
4. Net Cash generated or (Used) during the period (16,041) (6,554) 7,984 (16,030)
D. RATIO ANALYSIS
1. Performance
a. Sales Growth (for the period) -47.9% 15.5% 66.8% 7.0%
b. Gross Profit Margin 41.3% 33.0% 36.8% 30.3%
c. Net Profit Margin 16.2% 16.2% 15.9% 15.9%
d. Cash Conversion Efficiency (FCFO adjusted for Working Capital/Sales) -59.8% -0.1% 35.8% 23.3%
e. Return on Equity [ Net Profit Margin * Asset Turnover * (Total Assets/Shareholders' Equity )] 36.4% 66.0% 58.5% 35.0%
2. Working Capital Management
a. Gross Working Capital (Average Days) 86 25 22 37
b. Net Working Capital (Average Days) 59 6 6 17
c. Current Ratio (Current Assets / Current Liabilities) 0.9 0.7 0.4 0.6
3. Coverages
a. EBITDA / Finance Cost 6.5 10.9 28.1 10.7
b. FCFO / Finance Cost+CMLTB+Excess STB 0.4 0.3 1.1 0.5
c. Debt Payback (Total Borrowings+Excess STB) / (FCFO-Finance Cost) 5.4 6.5 1.0 2.9
4. Capital Structure
a. Total Borrowings / (Total Borrowings+Shareholders' Equity) 57.1% 42.2% 12.3% 33.5%
b. Interest or Markup Payable (Days) 66.1 109.2 14.0 90.6
c. Entity Average Borrowing Rate 12.4% 15.9% 12.9% 11.6%

Jul-25

www.pacra.com

Jul-25

www.pacra.com

  1. Rating Team Statements
    1. Rating is just an opinion about the creditworthiness of the entity and does not constitute a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell any security of the entity rated or to buy, hold, or sell the security rated, as the case may be. (Chapter III; 14-3-(x))
    2. Conflict of Interest
      1. The Rating Team or any of their family members have no interest in this rating (Chapter III; 12-2-(j))
      2. PACRA, the analysts involved in the rating process, and members of its rating committee and their family members do not have any conflict of interest relating to the rating done by them (Chapter III; 12-2-(e) & (k))
      3. The analyst is not a substantial shareholder of the customer being rated by PACRA [Annexure F; d-(ii)]
      4. Explanation: for the purpose of the above clause, the term "family members" shall include only those family members who are dependent on the analyst and members of the rating committee.
  2. Restrictions
    1. No director, officer, or employee of PACRA communicates the information acquired by him for use for rating purposes to any other person, except where required under law to do so. (Chapter III; 10-(5))
    2. PACRA does not disclose or discuss with outside parties or make improper use of the non-public information which has come to its knowledge during a business relationship with the customer. (Chapter III; 10-7-(d))
    3. PACRA does not make proposals or recommendations regarding the activities of rated entities that could impact a credit rating of the entity subject to rating. (Chapter III; 10-7-(k))
  3. Conduct of Business
    1. PACRA fulfills its obligations in a fair, efficient, transparent, and ethical manner and renders high standards of services in performing its functions and obligations. (Chapter III; 11-A-(a))
    2. PACRA uses due care in the preparation of this Rating Report. Our information has been obtained from sources we consider to be reliable, but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. PACRA does not, in every instance, independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing this Rating Report. (Clause 11-(A)(p))
    3. PACRA prohibits its employees and analysts from soliciting money, gifts, or favors from anyone with whom PACRA conducts business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(q))
    4. PACRA ensures before the commencement of the rating process that an analyst or employee has not had a recent employment or other significant business or personal relationship with the rated entity that may cause or may be perceived as causing a conflict of interest. (Chapter III; 11-A-(r))
    5. PACRA maintains the principle of integrity in seeking rating business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(u))
    6. PACRA promptly investigates in the event of misconduct or a breach of the policies, procedures, and controls, and takes appropriate steps to rectify any weaknesses to prevent any recurrence, along with suitable punitive action against the responsible employee(s). (Chapter III; 11-B-(m))
  4. Independence & Conflict of Interest
    1. PACRA receives compensation from the entity being rated or any third party for the rating services it offers. The receipt of this compensation has no influence on PACRA’s opinions or other analytical processes. In all instances, PACRA is committed to preserving the objectivity, integrity, and independence of its ratings. Our relationship is governed by two distinct mandates: i) rating mandate - signed with the entity being rated or issuer of the debt instrument, and ii) fee mandate - signed with the payer, which can be different from the entity.
    2. PACRA does not provide consultancy/advisory services or other services to any of its customers or their associated companies and associated undertakings that are being rated or have been rated by it during the preceding three years, unless it has an adequate mechanism in place ensuring that the provision of such services does not lead to a conflict of interest situation with its rating activities. (Chapter III; 12-2-(d))
    3. PACRA discloses that no shareholder directly or indirectly holding 10% or more of the share capital of PACRA also holds directly or indirectly 10% or more of the share capital of the entity which is subject to rating or the entity which issued the instrument subject to rating by PACRA. (Chapter III; 12-2-(f))
    4. PACRA ensures that the rating assigned to an entity or instrument is not affected by the existence of a business relationship between PACRA and the entity or any other party, or the non-existence of such a relationship. (Chapter III; 12-2-(i))
    5. PACRA ensures that the analysts or any of their family members shall not buy, sell, or engage in any transaction in any security which falls in the analyst’s area of primary analytical responsibility. This clause, however, does not apply to investments in securities through collective investment schemes. (Chapter III; 12-2-(l))
    6. PACRA has established policies and procedures governing investments and trading in securities by its employees and for monitoring the same to prevent insider trading, market manipulation, or any other market abuse. (Chapter III; 11-B-(g))
  5. Monitoring and Review
    1. PACRA monitors all the outstanding ratings continuously, and any potential change therein due to any event associated with the issuer, the security arrangement, the industry, etc., is disseminated to the market immediately and in an effective manner after appropriate consultation with the entity/issuer. (Chapter III; 17-(a))
    2. PACRA reviews all the outstanding ratings periodically on an annual basis. Provided that public dissemination of annual review and in an instance of change in rating will be made. (Chapter III; 17-(b))
    3. PACRA initiates an immediate review of the outstanding rating upon becoming aware of any information that may reasonably be expected to result in downgrading of the rating. (Chapter III; 17-(c))
    4. PACRA engages with the issuer and the debt securities trustee to remain updated on all information pertaining to the rating of the entity/instrument. (Chapter III; 17-(d))
  6. Probability of Default
    1. PACRA’s Rating Scale reflects the expectation of credit risk. The highest rating has the lowest relative likelihood of default (i.e., probability). PACRA’s transition studies capture the historical performance behavior of a specific rating notch. Transition behavior of the assigned rating can be obtained from PACRA’s Transition Study available at our website. (www.pacra.com) However, the actual transition of rating may not follow the pattern observed in the past. (Chapter III; 14-3(f)(vii))
  7. Proprietary Information
    1. All information contained herein is considered proprietary by PACRA. Hence, none of the information in this document can be copied or otherwise reproduced, stored, or disseminated in whole or in part in any form or by any means whatsoever by any person without PACRA’s prior written consent.

Jul-25

www.pacra.com