Rating History
Dissemination Date Long-Term Rating Short-Term Rating Outlook Action Rating Watch
11-Jul-25 AA- A1 Stable Initial -
About the Entity

FESCO, a public limited company incorporated on March 21, 1998, is headquartered in Faisalabad. It took over operations of the former FAEB from WAPDA, including all assets and liabilities. FESCO distributes and supply electricity through 132-kV and 66-kV grid stations across eight Central Punjab districts. FESCO is led by CEO Mr. M Aamer and governed by a Board of Directors, chaired by Mr. Omer Farooq Khan.

Rating Rationale

Faisalabad Electric Supply Company Limited (“FESCO” or “the Company”) is one of the ten government-owned distribution companies (DISCOs). The assigned ratings take comfort from the sovereign ownership of Government of Pakistan (GOP) under the Ministry of Energy – Power Division. The ratings also underpinned by its strategic significance as a key power utility to distribute electricity across Faisalabad and seven surrounding districts in Central Punjab, with its monopoly position within the service territory ensuring insulation from direct competition. As of May 2025, FESCO serves over 5.7 million consumers. The customer base is predominantly domestic, representing approximately 89% of total connections. Commercial consumers account for around 6%, industrial customers make up about 1%, while the remaining 4% falls under other categories. The Company's revenue is solely generated through electricity distribution, with the regulated pricing mechanism resulting in any difference between the allowed tariff and the consumer-end price being billed as a Tariff Differential Subsidy (TDS) borne by government and recorded in FESCO's topline. During FY25, the units sent out by FESCO increased marginally by approximately 1.7%, reaching 14,428 GWh, compared to 14,191 GWh in FY24. Transmission and distribution (T&D) losses improved, declining to 8.89% in FY25 from 9.82% in the previous year. Additionally, the Company’s recovery ratio showed an improvement over FY24 levels. The FESCO’s business risk profile reflects a low to moderate risk, primarily supported by its exposure to government entities and customer segments with reasonable recovery ratios, further backed by security deposits held against connections. The Company’s authority to disconnect the connections in case of non-payment also helps to improve the recoveries. Operational risk is strengthened by FESCO’s extensive network and the absence of alternate electricity distributors within its territory. However, the growing trend of solarization may introduce emerging risks to demand. Liquidity risk on the balance sheet remains low across timing buckets; however, delays in collections particularly from government-backed receivables can introduce some liquidity pressure. This risk is partially offset through netting arrangements or adjustments against government payables for electricity purchases. Pricing risk is considered minimal, as FESCO operates under a well-defined regulatory regime based on the Cost-Plus Tariff model, with end-user tariffs determined by the NEPRA. The Company also benefits from a strong cash conversion cycle, with working capital requirements largely managed through internally generated funds. As of 1HFY25, FESCO held short-term investments of PKR 17,500 million, indicating sound liquidity. The Company has no market-based borrowings on its balance sheet, with its long-term debt comprising relent loans provided by the GOP. The leverage ratio improved significantly to ~5% in 1HFY25, down from around 10% in FY24 and 78% in FY23, supported by asset revaluation reserves and equity infusions from the GOP. The Company continues to take benefit of financial, and managerial support from the government.

Key Rating Drivers

The assigned ratings hinge on FESCO’s ability to maintain sound financial management, ensure timely tariff adjustments, and improve operational performance—particularly by reducing T&D losses. However, revenue may be impacted by delays in tariff revisions and declining demand due to rising electricity costs and increased solar adoption. Additionally, the government's ongoing privatization drive for SOEs, including FESCO, remains a key factor in its future outlook.

Profile
Legal Structure

Faisalabad Electric Supply Company Limited ("FESCO" or "the Company") is a public limited company incorporated on March 21, 1998, under the Companies Ordinance, 1984 (now the Companies Act, 2017). The Company’s registered office is located on West Canal Road, Abdullahpur, Faisalabad. FESCO operates various 132-KV and 66-KV grid stations and maintains offices across eight districts of Central Punjab.


Background

FESCO is established by taking over all properties, rights, assets, liabilities, and obligations of the Faisalabad Area Electricity Board (FAEB), which was previously part of the Pakistan Water and Power Development Authority (WAPDA). The transfer also included other specified assets and liabilities as mutually agreed.

Prior to the amendment of the NEPRA Act in May 2018, the electricity distribution function encompassed both the physical infrastructure (commonly referred to as the wire business) and the sale of electricity to end-consumers. However, the NEPRA (Amendment) Act, 2018, introduced a structural change by separating the sale of electricity from the distribution function. FESCO currently distributes and supplies electricity to approximately 5.7 million customers within its licensed territory, serving a population of over 26 million.


Operations

The principal activity of the Company is the distribution and supply of electricity to the public within its defined geographical boundaries. This activity is carried out under a Distribution and Electric Supply License granted by the NEPRA in accordance with the Regulation of Generation, Transmission and Distribution of Electric Power Act, 1997 (NEPRA Act). The Company’s geographical service area comprises eight districts of Central Punjab, namely: Faisalabad, Sargodha, Mianwali, Khushab, Jhang, Bhakkar, Toba Tek Singh, and Chiniot.


Ownership
Ownership Structure

FESCO is wholly owned by the Government of Pakistan (GOP) through the Ministry of Energy (Power Division), with its shares registered in the name of the President of Pakistan.


Stability

FESCO has remained under the ownership of the GOP. Despite this continued public ownership, the privatization of FESCO has been part of the government’s broader policy agenda for several decades.

The process was initiated when the Council of Common Interest (CCI) approved the phased privatization of thermal power generation units (GENCOs) and distribution companies (DISCOs) on 12 September 1993. This policy direction was reaffirmed by the Cabinet Committee on Privatization (CCOP) on 17 February 2009 and subsequently ratified by the Federal Cabinet on 06 January 2010. Further support came from the President and Prime Minister of Pakistan during a presentation by the Ministry of Privatization on 22 November 2010, with final ratification by the CCI on 28 April 2011.

In October 2013, CCOP included FESCO among 68 Public Sector Enterprises (PSEs) identified for privatization. Initially, on 02 November 2015, the Privatization Commission (PC) invited Expressions of Interest (EOIs) for a strategic sale of 74% of FESCO's shareholding, along with management control. However, due to strong opposition from various stakeholders, the Government reconsidered its approach, shifting from strategic sale to divestment through capital markets, while retaining management and majority ownership.

Accordingly, in its meeting held on 14 July 2016, CCOP approved the initiation of the Initial Public Offering (IPO) process to list a portion of FESCO’s shares on the stock exchange. The IPO aimed to improve transparency, broaden public ownership, and strengthen corporate governance without compromising Government control.

Later, in light of the financial challenges in the power sector, including circular debt and operational inefficiencies, the Privatization Commission, in its meeting on 02 October 2017, revisited the privatization approach and recommended returning to the strategic sale model.

Most recently, the Ministry of Energy (Power Division) reaffirmed the GOP’s commitment to privatization through notification dated 30 July 2024, and in a subsequent letter dated 28 August 2024, directed FESCO, along with few other distribution companies, to compile preliminary information to facilitate the privatization process. While FESCO remains under full Government ownership, its inclusion in successive privatization agendas reflects an ongoing commitment to reform and restructuring within the energy sector.


Business Acumen

FESCO has established itself as an efficient electricity distribution company, operating since 1998 and supplying power to one of the country’s key urban centers—Faisalabad—along with surrounding districts. Entirely owned by the GOP, FESCO benefits from the State’s extensive experience and institutional financial support.

The GOP is actively working toward the development of a competitive electricity market through the implementation of the CTBCM (Competitive Trading Bilateral Contract Market) model. As this market structure evolves, FESCO is expected to operate with greater independence and efficiency in a liberalized environment, relying less on government support.

Additionally, the privatization process is underway. Once completed, it may open new avenues for FESCO’s business direction and operational approach, depending on the priorities and strategy of the new ownership.


Financial Strength

FESCO is currently under sovereign ownership, and given its strategic importance as a major electricity distributor in one of the key regions of the country, the likelihood of continued government support remains high. This support, particularly in the form of financial assistance, has been demonstrated in the past through capital injections when needed.Additionally, FESCO receives subsidies from the Government to facilitate the provision of electricity at discounted rates to low-income consumers. These subsidies include components such as the Tariff Differential Subsidy (TDS), AQTA Subsidy, Zero-Rated Industrial Rebate, and the Kissan Package Subsidy Income.


Governance
Board Structure

The Board of Directors comprises nine members, including five independent directors, three non-executive directors and one executive director, with two female members among the total composition. The Board is appointed by the Ministry of Power in July 2024 for the period of 3 years.


Members’ Profile

The members of the Board are experienced professionals from diverse backgrounds. Mr. Omer Farooq Khan, a businessman, serves as the Chairman of the Board and has been associated with FESCO from July 2024. The remaining members bring expertise in law, public service, and business, collectively supporting FESCO’s strategic direction and governance.


Board Effectiveness

The Board has constituted five committees to support the Company’s operations and provide strategic guidance. These committees are:

  1. Audit, Finance, Investigation, Financial Risk Management & Internal Control Committee
  2. HR, Admin, Legal & HSE Committee
  3. Technical Initiatives, Development, Operational and Procurement Committee
  4. Policy, Strategy, Marketing & Risk Management Committee
  5. Customer Services and IT Initiatives Committee

The Audit and Technical Committees comprise five members each, while the remaining committees consist of six members. Each committee is chaired by a relevant and experienced Board member, and the Terms of Reference (ToR) for each committee are properly documented.

Meetings are convened as required by the Board of Directors. However, in accordance with governance practices, the Audit Committee, Customer Services Committee, and Risk Management Committee are required to meet at least once every quarter. The attendance of Board members in committee meetings during the year remained above satisfactory.


Financial Transparency

Riaz Ahmad & Company, Chartered Accountants, serve as the external auditors of the Company. They have issued an unqualified audit opinion on the financial statements for FY 2024. However, certain matters were highlighted in the Emphasis of Matter paragraph; these did not modify or affect the overall audit opinion.

The Company's financial statements are prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Companies Act, 2017, and applicable International Accounting Standards (IAS). Additionally, the management prepares quarterly accounts to ensure regular financial reporting and oversight.


Management
Organizational Structure

FESCO has a well-defined and properly documented organizational structure designed to support effective governance, operational efficiency, and accountability. At the top of the hierarchy is the Chief Executive Officer (CEO), who is responsible for the overall management and strategic direction of the Company. The CEO, with consolidated input from all functional departments, reports directly to the Board of Directors.

Supporting the CEO are the heads of key departments, including the Chief Financial Officer (CFO), General Managers - Operations, Customer Services, Technical Services, Chief Engineer Planning & Designing (P&D), Dirctor General, HR, Admin, IT, and Chief Internal Auditor (CIA). These departments are led by experienced professionals and are further supported by competent and skilled team members who bring specialized expertise to their respective functions.

Additionally, the Company Secretary and the Chief Internal Auditor maintain independent reporting lines directly to the Board of Directors, ensuring transparency and compliance with corporate governance requirements. Top of FormBottom of Form


Management Team

Mr. Muhammad Aamer, who holds a B.Sc. in Electrical Engineering and an MBA in Finance, serves as the CEO of FESCO. He has been associated with the Company since 1995, bringing decades of industry experience and institutional knowledge to the role. Mr. Nazir Ahmed, the CFO, is a Fellow Public Finance Accountant (FPFA) and a Fellow Chartered Management Accountant (FCMA). He has been with FESCO since 1992.

Mr. Ihtisham Ullah serves as the Chief Internal Auditor. Other key members of the leadership team include Mr. Umer Hayat (GM Operations), Mr. Muhammad Rafique (GM Technical), Mr. Mubashar Hayat Rao (GM Commercial & Customer Services), and Mr. Muzaffar Abbas (Company Secretary)

The leadership team also comprises Mr. Ghulam Mujtaba Khan (Director General HR), Mr. Muhammad Munawar Khan (Director General Admin), Mr. Muhammad Imad Ullah (Director General IT), and Mr. Farrukh Aftab (Director General Law).

Additionally, Ms. Sadaf Naz, serving as Director General (MIRAD), plays a pivotal role in overseeing FESCO’s strategic initiatives under the DISCOS reform plan, particularly in relation to the implementation of the Competitive Trading Bilateral Contract Market (CTBCM) framework. She also manages tariff preparation and regulatory matters with NEPRA.

All senior management members have had long-standing associations with the Company and are supported by experienced teams under the leadership of the CEO. Clear roles and responsibilities have been formally defined and documented, ensuring structured governance and efficient decision-making across all operational areas.


Effectiveness

FESCO’s management team demonstrates effectiveness in its role, supported by relevant experience, professional qualifications, and a long-standing association with the Company. The team is responsible for overseeing key functional areas, allowing the Company to maintain operational continuity, comply with regulatory requirements, and implement strategic initiatives in an organized and structured manner.

The management’s role is further reinforced by the Board of Directors through its specialized committees, which provide oversight and strategic guidance on critical matters. This governance framework supports informed decision-making and helps ensure alignment with the Company’s overall objectives.


MIS

FESCO has implemented a comprehensive Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system designed to streamline and enhance its core business operations. The ERP system is structured around four major modules:

i) Financial Reporting Module – Enables accurate and timely financial analysis, budgeting, auditing, and regulatory compliance through automated reporting and data consolidation.

ii) Human Resources (HR) Module – Manages the entire employee lifecycle, including recruitment, payroll, attendance, performance evaluations, and benefits administration, contributing to efficient workforce management.

iii) Transaction Module – Handles day-to-day operational transactions such as procurement, inventory management, and service processing, ensuring smooth internal workflows.

iv) Management Module – Provides tools for planning, monitoring, and decision-making at the executive level, supporting strategic management and organizational performance.

In addition to the ERP modules, FESCO employs an integrated billing system for its consumer services. This billing system is fully synchronized with the ERP platform, allowing for real-time data exchange, accurate billing, customer account tracking, and efficient revenue management. The integration ensures transparency, minimizes errors, and enhances customer satisfaction through reliable and timely service delivery.


Control Environment

FESCO maintains an adequate control environment, supported by well-defined policies and procedures. The Company’s internal audit function conducts regular reviews of financial, operational, and compliance controls to ensure adherence to internal standards and regulatory requirements.

In addition to routine audits, dedicated teams have been established to target high-loss areas, aiming to reduce distribution losses and improve efficiency. A comprehensive audit program—distinct from standard financial audits—has also been implemented. This program covers a broad range of operational areas, including human resources, procurement, and quality assurance, with the objective of identifying potential risks, preventing corruption, eliminating ambiguities, and ensuring transparency. These proactive measures are designed to strengthen internal controls and enhance the overall governance of the Company.


Business Risk
Industry Dynamics

Pakistan’s power sector functions under a centralized model, with the Central Power Purchasing Agency Guarantee (CPPA-G) serving as the sole buyer of electricity for the country’s eleven Distribution Companies (DISCOs). These DISCOs are responsible for the distribution and supply of electricity to end consumers, management of infrastructure, billing, and revenue collection. They provide demand forecasts to NEPRA with a copy to CPPA-G and ISMO (Independent System & Market Operator), which procures electricity from both government-owned generation companies (GENCOs) and Independent Power Producers (IPPs).

The National Electric Power Regulatory Authority (NEPRA) oversees the sector’s regulatory framework, including procurement mechanisms and tariff setting, based on the costs of generation, transmission, and distribution. While NEPRA determines cost-reflective tariffs, the government enforces a uniform tariff across all DISCOs to ensure affordability and equity, bridging the cost gap through subsidies.

Despite this structure, the sector faces persistent structural challenges, most notably the accumulation of circular debt. In response, the government and stakeholders are pursuing several reform initiatives aimed at improving efficiency and reducing losses. These include the privatization of DISCOs, enhanced operational management, deployment of Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI), and the installation of Aerial Bundled Cables (ABC) to curb electricity theft and minimize technical losses.


Relative Position

FESCO is one of the eleven state-owned DISCOs operating under the Ministry of Energy (Power Division) in Pakistan. Among these, FESCO is generally regarded as one of the better-performing DISCOs, consistently maintaining a strong position in terms of operational efficiency, lower transmission and distribution (T&D) losses, and high bill recovery ratios. Compared to other DISCOs, particularly those in high-loss regions such as PESCO, HESCO, SEPCO, and QESCO, FESCO demonstrates more effective financial and operational management, resulting in a relatively lower contribution to the country’s circular debt.

FESCO is typically ranked among the top three DISCOs, alongside Islamabad Electric Supply Company (IESCO) and Gujranwala Electric Power Company (GEPCO). Its service territory includes Faisalabad—one of Pakistan’s major industrial centers—and surrounding districts, adding to its strategic importance within the national electricity distribution network. Given its consistent performance and strong operational framework, FESCO plays a vital role in the government’s broader plans for sectoral reforms and privatization.


Revenues

FESCO’s financial performance over the past three fiscal years reflects a consistent upward trend in revenue, largely driven by tariff adjustments rather than increased electricity demand. In FY 2023, revenue grew by 12.7% compared to FY 2022, reaching PKR 380,864 million, including TDS PKR 50,990 million, while TDS in FY22 stood at PKR 57,945 million with a modest 1.1% increase in units sold, indicating stable consumption patterns and possibly improved recovery efforts. In FY 2024, revenue further increased by 21.0% to PKR 461,024, including TDS PKR 26,249 million substantially lower than previous years, while units sold declined by 3.2%, falling to 14,190.93 GWh. This divergence suggests that revenue growth was primarily influenced by upward revisions in tariff rates and reduced reliance on government subsidies, rather than volume growth.

The decline in units sold is also partly attributed to the increasing shift of consumers toward rooftop solar installations, which has begun to impact grid-based consumption. As more consumers adopt net metering and distributed generation, especially in urban and industrial areas, the trend is likely to continue, leading to further moderation in energy demand from the distribution grid.

The similar trend continues in the first half of FY 2025, where FESCO reported revenue of PKR 273,831 million against units sold of 7,752.520 GWh. In comparison, during the first half of FY 2024, revenue stood at PKR 243,710 million with 8,149.790 GWh of electricity sold. This reflects a 12.4% increase in revenue despite a 4.9% decrease in units sold, indicating that the revenue growth was primarily driven by higher average tariffs rather than increased electricity consumption.

Additionally, TDS from the GOP amounted to PKR 38,893 million in 1HFY25, significantly higher than PKR 14,565 million in 1HFY24.


Margins

In FY24, the Company purchased a total of 15,736.45 GWh of electricity, including 103 GWh through net metering, compared to 16,087.74 GWh in FY23 and 15,984.48 GWh in FY22, reflecting a marginal decline in volumes over the past two years. Despite the slight decrease in units purchased, the average cost of electricity rose significantly, reaching PKR 27.16/kWh in FY24, up from PKR 22.48/kWh in FY23. However, a downward trend in the purchase price was observed in 1HFY25, where the average cost declined to PKR 24.45/kWh, compared to PKR 24.94/kWh in 1HFY24.

The total cost of electricity purchased in 1HFY25 reduced to PKR 200,943 million, down from PKR 217,411 million in the same period last year. For the full year FY24, the cost stood at PKR 424,588 million—significantly higher than PKR 360,599 million in FY23—primarily driven by increased tariffs rather than higher volumes.

As a result of these dynamics, gross margins improved substantially to 26.6% in 1HFY25, up from 7.9% in FY24 and 5.3% in FY23. This expansion reflects lower purchase prices and relatively stable or slightly higher selling prices, supported in part by government subsidies. Net margins followed a similar trajectory, rising to 19.5% in 1HFY25, compared to 0.2% in FY24 and a negative 3.1% in FY23, indicating a marked turnaround in profitability and overall operational efficiency.


Sustainability

FESCO is among the better-performing electricity distribution companies in Pakistan in terms of operational efficiency, characterized by lower distribution losses and a high bill collection rate. Its primary service area is Faisalabad, often referred to as the "Manchester of Pakistan" due to its strong textile industry presence. The Company has been identified by the GOP, along with two other distribution companies, for potential privatization.

The Company’s customer base is predominantly domestic, accounting for ~89% of total consumers, followed by commercial (6%), industrial (1%), and other categories (4%).

In line with the Competitive Trading and Bilateral Contracting Market (CTBCM) framework and the National Electricity Policy aimed at market liberalization, FESCO has set up a Market Implementation and Regulatory Affairs Department (MIRAD). This unit serves as the company’s interface with the evolving power market and regulatory environment, supporting functions such as power procurement planning, contract management, compliance, and coordination with NEPRA and other sector entities. MIRAD plays a key role in ensuring FESCO’s readiness for competitive market operations and regulatory obligations.


Financial Risk
Working capital

The business model of electricity distribution companies typically does not involve significant inventory, except for minimal store items used for maintenance and repairs. Their working capital cycle primarily consists of receivables from consumers against electricity sales, subsidy receivables from the government, and payables to CPPA-G for power purchases. FESCO's recovery ratio remained strong at 97% in FY24, reflecting efficient cash collection and effective receivables management.

Receivables stood at PKR 60,758 million in 1HFY25, compared to PKR 76,116 million in FY24. On the other hand, payables amounted to PKR 52,168 million in 1HFY25 and PKR 123,578 million in FY24, including outstanding payments to CPPA-G of PKR 20,312 million and PKR 89,103 million, respectively. The Company typically manages its working capital by utilizing customer collections to meet operational needs and often delays payments to CPPA-G. Notably, it does so without relying on short-term borrowings, demonstrating strong internal cash flow management.


Coverages

In 1HFY25 and FY24, the Company demonstrated a strong debt coverage ratio, driven by a significant improvement in Free Cashflows from Operations (FCFO). FCFO rose sharply to PKR 50,554 million in 1HFY25, compared to PKR 9,194 million in FY24 and PKR 1,420 million in FY23. This notable increase is primarily attributed to improved profitability, including the recognition of a substantial portion of Tariff Differential Subsidy claims related to customer tariff adjustments, which were booked during the current period. Additionally, the Company maintains healthy liquidity on its balance sheet in the form of short-term investments and cash reserves, further strengthening its financial flexibility.


Capitalization

In 1HFY25, the Company reported a notable improvement in its capitalization profile. The gearing ratio improved to 5.1%, down from 10.1% in FY24 and 78.3% in FY23. This positive shift in capitalization metrics was primarily driven by an increase in the equity base, which included a revaluation reserve of approximately PKR 49 billion recognized in FY24, along with consistent equity injections by the GOP. As a result, the Company’s paid-up share capital increased from PKR 34 billion in FY22 to PKR 46 billion in 1HFY25. Additionally, the Company has no short-term borrowings and only minimal long-term debt, which consists of concessional loans obtained from the government, further reflecting its strong capital structure and low reliance on external financing.


 
 

Jul-25

www.pacra.com


Dec-24
6M
Jun-24
12M
Jun-23
12M
Jun-22
12M
A. BALANCE SHEET
1. Non-Current Assets 236,246 231,033 161,841 144,105
2. Investments 17,500 17,500 19,000 23,500
3. Related Party Exposure 11,216 12,547 12,082 11,495
4. Current Assets 112,557 133,981 125,911 130,791
a. Inventories 6,542 6,625 5,005 3,366
b. Trade Receivables 60,758 76,116 68,480 82,644
5. Total Assets 377,519 395,061 318,834 309,891
6. Current Liabilities 37,720 40,282 30,662 23,771
a. Trade Payables 929 1,181 846 869
7. Borrowings 5,541 5,541 5,541 5,541
8. Related Party Exposure 21,116 89,764 91,623 97,859
9. Non-Current Liabilities 210,033 210,399 189,476 171,351
10. Net Assets 103,109 49,075 1,532 11,369
11. Shareholders' Equity 103,109 49,075 1,532 11,369
B. INCOME STATEMENT
1. Sales 273,831 461,024 380,864 337,812
a. Cost of Good Sold (200,943) (424,588) (360,600) (316,040)
2. Gross Profit 72,888 36,436 20,265 21,772
a. Operating Expenses (20,879) (41,942) (36,782) (26,162)
3. Operating Profit 52,009 (5,506) (16,518) (4,390)
a. Non Operating Income or (Expense) 5,831 12,767 9,354 6,125
4. Profit or (Loss) before Interest and Tax 57,841 7,261 (7,163) 1,735
a. Total Finance Cost (441) (882) (882) (470)
b. Taxation (3,895) (5,381) (3,861) (3,249)
6. Net Income Or (Loss) 53,505 998 (11,907) (1,985)
C. CASH FLOW STATEMENT
a. Free Cash Flows from Operations (FCFO) 50,554 9,194 1,420 16,887
b. Net Cash from Operating Activities before Working Capital Changes 50,553 9,192 1,417 16,884
c. Changes in Working Capital (49,860) (3,582) 1,486 (14,911)
1. Net Cash provided by Operating Activities 693 5,609 2,903 1,974
2. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Investing Activities (6,175) (16,326) (18,934) (11,927)
3. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Financing Activities 5,110 8,054 10,974 12,538
4. Net Cash generated or (Used) during the period (372) (2,663) (5,056) 2,585
D. RATIO ANALYSIS
1. Performance
a. Sales Growth (for the period) 18.8% 21.0% 12.7% N/A
b. Gross Profit Margin 26.6% 7.9% 5.3% 6.4%
c. Net Profit Margin 19.5% 0.2% -3.1% -0.6%
d. Cash Conversion Efficiency (FCFO adjusted for Working Capital/Sales) 0.3% 1.2% 0.8% 0.6%
e. Return on Equity [ Net Profit Margin * Asset Turnover * (Total Assets/Shareholders' Equity )] 140.6% 3.9% -184.6% -17.5%
2. Working Capital Management
a. Gross Working Capital (Average Days) 50 62 76 93
b. Net Working Capital (Average Days) 49 61 76 92
c. Current Ratio (Current Assets / Current Liabilities) 3.0 3.3 4.1 5.5
3. Coverages
a. EBITDA / Finance Cost 154.1 34.6 20.1 65.2
b. FCFO / Finance Cost+CMLTB+Excess STB 27.8 2.5 0.4 6.4
c. Debt Payback (Total Borrowings+Excess STB) / (FCFO-Finance Cost) 0.1 0.7 10.2 0.3
4. Capital Structure
a. Total Borrowings / (Total Borrowings+Shareholders' Equity) 5.1% 10.1% 78.3% 32.8%
b. Interest or Markup Payable (Days) 2711.4 2535.9 2170.9 3377.1
c. Entity Average Borrowing Rate 15.9% 15.9% 15.9% 8.5%

Jul-25

www.pacra.com

Jul-25

www.pacra.com

  1. Rating Team Statements
    1. Rating is just an opinion about the creditworthiness of the entity and does not constitute a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell any security of the entity rated or to buy, hold, or sell the security rated, as the case may be. (Chapter III; 14-3-(x))
    2. Conflict of Interest
      1. The Rating Team or any of their family members have no interest in this rating (Chapter III; 12-2-(j))
      2. PACRA, the analysts involved in the rating process, and members of its rating committee and their family members do not have any conflict of interest relating to the rating done by them (Chapter III; 12-2-(e) & (k))
      3. The analyst is not a substantial shareholder of the customer being rated by PACRA [Annexure F; d-(ii)]
      4. Explanation: for the purpose of the above clause, the term "family members" shall include only those family members who are dependent on the analyst and members of the rating committee.
  2. Restrictions
    1. No director, officer, or employee of PACRA communicates the information acquired by him for use for rating purposes to any other person, except where required under law to do so. (Chapter III; 10-(5))
    2. PACRA does not disclose or discuss with outside parties or make improper use of the non-public information which has come to its knowledge during a business relationship with the customer. (Chapter III; 10-7-(d))
    3. PACRA does not make proposals or recommendations regarding the activities of rated entities that could impact a credit rating of the entity subject to rating. (Chapter III; 10-7-(k))
  3. Conduct of Business
    1. PACRA fulfills its obligations in a fair, efficient, transparent, and ethical manner and renders high standards of services in performing its functions and obligations. (Chapter III; 11-A-(a))
    2. PACRA uses due care in the preparation of this Rating Report. Our information has been obtained from sources we consider to be reliable, but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. PACRA does not, in every instance, independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing this Rating Report. (Clause 11-(A)(p))
    3. PACRA prohibits its employees and analysts from soliciting money, gifts, or favors from anyone with whom PACRA conducts business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(q))
    4. PACRA ensures before the commencement of the rating process that an analyst or employee has not had a recent employment or other significant business or personal relationship with the rated entity that may cause or may be perceived as causing a conflict of interest. (Chapter III; 11-A-(r))
    5. PACRA maintains the principle of integrity in seeking rating business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(u))
    6. PACRA promptly investigates in the event of misconduct or a breach of the policies, procedures, and controls, and takes appropriate steps to rectify any weaknesses to prevent any recurrence, along with suitable punitive action against the responsible employee(s). (Chapter III; 11-B-(m))
  4. Independence & Conflict of Interest
    1. PACRA receives compensation from the entity being rated or any third party for the rating services it offers. The receipt of this compensation has no influence on PACRA’s opinions or other analytical processes. In all instances, PACRA is committed to preserving the objectivity, integrity, and independence of its ratings. Our relationship is governed by two distinct mandates: i) rating mandate - signed with the entity being rated or issuer of the debt instrument, and ii) fee mandate - signed with the payer, which can be different from the entity.
    2. PACRA does not provide consultancy/advisory services or other services to any of its customers or their associated companies and associated undertakings that are being rated or have been rated by it during the preceding three years, unless it has an adequate mechanism in place ensuring that the provision of such services does not lead to a conflict of interest situation with its rating activities. (Chapter III; 12-2-(d))
    3. PACRA discloses that no shareholder directly or indirectly holding 10% or more of the share capital of PACRA also holds directly or indirectly 10% or more of the share capital of the entity which is subject to rating or the entity which issued the instrument subject to rating by PACRA. (Chapter III; 12-2-(f))
    4. PACRA ensures that the rating assigned to an entity or instrument is not affected by the existence of a business relationship between PACRA and the entity or any other party, or the non-existence of such a relationship. (Chapter III; 12-2-(i))
    5. PACRA ensures that the analysts or any of their family members shall not buy, sell, or engage in any transaction in any security which falls in the analyst’s area of primary analytical responsibility. This clause, however, does not apply to investments in securities through collective investment schemes. (Chapter III; 12-2-(l))
    6. PACRA has established policies and procedures governing investments and trading in securities by its employees and for monitoring the same to prevent insider trading, market manipulation, or any other market abuse. (Chapter III; 11-B-(g))
  5. Monitoring and Review
    1. PACRA monitors all the outstanding ratings continuously, and any potential change therein due to any event associated with the issuer, the security arrangement, the industry, etc., is disseminated to the market immediately and in an effective manner after appropriate consultation with the entity/issuer. (Chapter III; 17-(a))
    2. PACRA reviews all the outstanding ratings periodically on an annual basis. Provided that public dissemination of annual review and in an instance of change in rating will be made. (Chapter III; 17-(b))
    3. PACRA initiates an immediate review of the outstanding rating upon becoming aware of any information that may reasonably be expected to result in downgrading of the rating. (Chapter III; 17-(c))
    4. PACRA engages with the issuer and the debt securities trustee to remain updated on all information pertaining to the rating of the entity/instrument. (Chapter III; 17-(d))
  6. Probability of Default
    1. PACRA’s Rating Scale reflects the expectation of credit risk. The highest rating has the lowest relative likelihood of default (i.e., probability). PACRA’s transition studies capture the historical performance behavior of a specific rating notch. Transition behavior of the assigned rating can be obtained from PACRA’s Transition Study available at our website. (www.pacra.com) However, the actual transition of rating may not follow the pattern observed in the past. (Chapter III; 14-3(f)(vii))
  7. Proprietary Information
    1. All information contained herein is considered proprietary by PACRA. Hence, none of the information in this document can be copied or otherwise reproduced, stored, or disseminated in whole or in part in any form or by any means whatsoever by any person without PACRA’s prior written consent.

Jul-25

www.pacra.com